Andres Bonifacio Biographical Notes Part
Andres Bonifacio Biographical Notes Part
Andres Bonifacio Biographical Notes Part
BONIFACIO
Biographical notes
Bonifacio decrees that the rank bestowed upon Jacinto must be respected
by all subjects of the “Government of the Revolution” (“Pamahalaan nang
Panghihimagsik”). This is another term not found on earlier documents,
and it asserts in effect that a new government is not needed, because one
already exists – a government whose authority should be acknowledged
and obeyed by every citizen.1
Mid- Bonifacio meets the leaders of the recently formed Regional Government
April of Batangas, most likely at their base “in exile” in Indang, Cavite, about 20
kilometers southeast of Naic.2 The Batangueños tell Bonifacio about their
plans to launch simultaneous attacks on the Spanish garrisons in eight
towns in their province, and he agrees to send 40 of his own troops under
the command of General Artemio Ricarte to support them. 3
16 Apr Bonifacio writes to Jacinto to tell him about the Tejeros convention, “the
1897 turmoil here,” and the military defeats. In Cavite, he notes sadly, the
unity and fortitude that formerly prevailed [has] now been lost”. He
worries the same might happen in central Luzon, where he fears a local
leader named Mamerto Natividad will soon “be doing there what he did
here [in Cavite]: slander us” (“gawin sa dakong iyan ang ginawa niya ditong
paninira sa atin”).
2
Bonifacio is uncertain about his own plans.
If the Batangueños have the good fortune
to take the town of Lipa, he says, they will
invite him to go there and establish a base
from which the revolution could be
expanded southwards into the Camarines.
But he wonders too whether he should head north, and go together with
Jacinto to Bulacan and Nueva Ecija. The Katipuneros who had gone to
Cavite from the Manila region, he says, desperately want now to return
home. They are begging him to help them get away, and to take them
“back there, to our place” (“ang lahat halos (ng mga K) ay naglulumuhod sa
akin, na silay ilayas ko na at dalhin diyan sa atin”).
And yet, Bonifacio tells Jacinto, he feels he cannot accede to their request,
“because I pity the great number of innocent citizens [in the Cavite towns
not yet captured by the Spaniards] who will be facing the most dreadful
troubles and slaughter” (“datapua’t hindi ko payagan ito sa pagkat ako’y
naaawa sa makapal na taong bayan na walang kasalanan ay siyang aabutin ng
katakot takot na pagkaligalig at kamatayan.”) He is also reluctant to leave
Cavite immediately because he still wants to wait for the expected
shipment of weapons to arrive from Hong Kong.
Bonifacio seems torn. He wants to be gone from Cavite, but also feels
obliged to stay a while longer. He asks Jacinto to advise him where he is
needed most.6
c. 19 Bonifacio had another, still more compelling, reason for delaying his
Apr departure. Convinced that the revolution was being betrayed, he wanted
to depose Aguinaldo from his leadership position, whether that be War
President of the Magdalo council (the title Aguinaldo was still using) or
President-elect of the Philippine Republic (which had not yet been
proclaimed and which Bonifacio and the Magdiwang “loyalists” rejected
as illegitimate).
3
allegiance to an army headed by commanders who remained steadfast to
the cause. If the Magdalo army could be won over, they visualized,
Aguinaldo would be discredited and isolated, and the forces of the
revolution would be united in their determination to fight on.
Bonifacio and his associates must have discussed the meeting in advance,
both among themselves and with the Magdalo commanders they had
invited. They had persuaded the Magdalo commanders to bring their
troops with them to the estate house on the promise that they would be
served “delicious food” (“masarap na rancho”). It is therefore difficult to
imagine that the meeting could have been kept secret, but it was held
behind closed doors, and guards were posted with orders to stop anyone
who had not been invited from entering.
Bonifacio took the chair, and presented the case against Aguinaldo.8 He
looked back to before the Tejeros convention, when Aguinaldo had
signalled his willingness to enter peace negotiations with the Spaniards.
He then mentioned the surrender, a week previously, of Daniel Tirona,
José del Rosario, Juan Cailles and other Magdalo leaders, which
Aguinaldo had failed to prevent or instantly condemn. At about the same
time, Bonifacio alleged, Aguinaldo had agreed to release the three
Spanish prisoners of war, and had authorized the Magdalo minister of
finance, Cayetano Topacio, to escort them safely to the Spanish
authorities in Tanza. When he, Bonifacio, had found out about the release,
he had ordered his men to detain Topacio and the prisoners. Topacio had
been court-martialed (“pinaghatulan sa Sangunian Digma”), but had not
been punished.9 “Favoritismo” had prevailed, and “people covered up for
each other”.10
And now, Bonifacio claimed, the full extent of Aguinaldo’s treachery had
been revealed. He too was planning to surrender – not just himself alone,
but every weapon the revolutionists had in Cavite. He wanted the entire
revolutionary army to be disarmed and disbanded. Bonifacio showed the
meeting an anonymous letter. It disclosed, he said, that the release of the
Spanish prisoners had been part of Aguinaldo’s plan. One of the
prisoners, Domingo Martinez, was to deliver to acting Governor General
José Lachambre a letter from Aguinaldo confirming the terms of the
surrender. This underhand betrayal, Bonifacio added, was the reason
4
Aguinaldo had been lying low in recent days, pretending to be sick
(“nagsasakit-sakitan”).11
As Bonifacio hoped, the meeting agreed that the forces of the revolution
should be reorganized under a single command in which Aguinaldo
would have no part. Forty-two leaders and commanders signed a
document, later known as the Naic Military Agreement, which declares
that “certain chiefs” – meaning, but not naming, Emilio Aguinaldo and
others – had committed treason (“kataksilan”) by coming to an agreement
with the Spanish enemy (“pag ayon sa kaauay na Kastila”) and by
destroying the strength that comes from unity (“pag sira ng matibay na
pagkakaisa”). All officers and troops, the signatories affirm, will be unified,
“by persuasion or force,” in a single army under the command of General
Pio del Pilar. “We shall recognize no authority,” they pledge, “other than
justice, and …steadfast leaders who from the beginning and until now
have not committed Treason….”12
But the success was momentary; it slipped away even before it could be
grasped. Lazaro Makapagal, a Magdalo major (comandante) who had
gone to the casa hacienda upon Pio del Pilar’s orders with 60 riflemen, felt
uneasy after his troops had been taken upstairs, and he had been left in
compound below with Bonifacio’s brother Ciriaco watching over him.
Makapagal suspected that his men were being detained, and might be
ordered to surrender their rifles. He made a break for it whilst Ciriaco
was looking the other way. He jumped over the compound wall and ran
off to tell Aguinaldo was happening.13
5
Ordering the others to remain in the compound, and only to follow if they
heard him fire a single shot, Aguinaldo went into the building and crept
up the stairs. Through a small crack in the door he saw the meeting in
progress, and listened to what Bonifacio was saying. Procopio Bonifacio
caught him eavesdropping, and ushered him into the room. “Everybody
was amazed (“nangagulantang ng lahat”), Aguinaldo recounts, but
Bonifacio invited him to join them. Aguinaldo politely declined, and went
to search for the Magdalo troops who had been confined in other rooms
and bodegas. It was not just Makapagal’s 60 riflemen who had been
detained, it seems, but also the troops brought to the casa hacienda by Pio
del Pilar, Mariano Noriel and other Magdalo commanders. Aguinaldo
says that all his riflemen (“lahat nang aking mga kawal na barilan”) had been
locked up. The men he had deployed around the perimeter of the house
had been sandatahan or kawal na gulukan, armed only with blades.16
The memoirs by Aguinaldo and Makapagal are plainly partisan and self-
congratulatory. As always, due allowance must be made. Bonifacio and
his allies, regrettably, never told their side of the story. Bonifacio did not
mention the Naic meeting in the letter he wrote a few days later to
Jacinto, and neither did Santiago Alvarez or Artemio Ricarte – two other
prominent participants – in their respective memoirs. Gregoria de Jesus
mentioned the meeting, but only in a few words: “Pio del Pilar and other
leaders went upstairs and appealed for the troops to be brought together
under a single command, in order to more effective, and in fact
everybody endorsed and signed an agreement to that effect.”19
c.20 Apr Before dawn, Bonifacio leaves Naic together with his wife, his brothers
Procopio and Ciriaco, and about 40 Balara men, some of whom have their
families with them. Gregoria de Jesus is reportedly seen walking directly
behind two Balara men who are carrying a cash box or safe (“caja de
caudales”).21
6
They go to the neighboring town of Indang, where it seems they initially
took up quarters in the población – possibly at the barracks previously
occupied by the Guardia Civil.22
c.20-22 Soon after they arrived in Indang, Gregoria de Jesus recalls, “trouble
Apr started because they [the town council] did not want to feed the soldiers,”
or would only give them unpolished rice (“bigas na pinawa”). One day, she
says, the Balara men went out reconnoitering. When they came back, they
were told there was no dinner, and they would have to starve until the
morning. But then there was no breakfast either. The cook said the town
president, Severino de las Alas, had given him an order: if the soldiers
wanted food, they should be told to ask their relations. This was not
realistic advice. Hungry and angry, the men went to see Bonifacio, and he
went to see the town president to protest.23
That day, Bonifacio’s intervention worked, and the men were able to eat.
But the basic problem was not solved, and the relationship between
Bonifacio’s group and the town’s leaders and citizens became very tense.
c. 22-23 The frictions worsened. The town president flatly refused to give any
Apr more food to Bonifacio’s men. Their arrival in Indang, he told a squad
Bonifacio had sent to the Tribunal, had overburdened the town’s limited
resources. If they came again to ask for help, he threatened, “something
might happen” (“binantaan pa na may mangyayari kapag umulit na humingi
ng abuloy.”)25
When the men reported back, Bonifacio flew into a rage. “Those brethren
are traitors! … Here we are ready to offer our blood and life itself for the
cause of freedom, and what do we get in return? Threats! Tell me, what
do we do in the face of such behavior? Burn the town! No mercy!
(“walang patawarin!”). Begin with the convent and church, so they know
what retribution is fitting for those who deny sympathy and succor to the
needs of the Motherland! (“ang ganti ng katwiran sa ayaw magmasakit at
tumulong sa pangangailangan ng Inang Bayan!”).26
7
fast, Alvarez says, that Bonifacio had ordered his men to burn the whole
town. His men burnt nothing; they took his words not as commands but
as curses. The people of Indang, however, were frightened, and angry.27
The town’s leaders positioned cannon (falconete) in the plaza, and
deployed troops with bolos at key points, ready if necessary to confront
Bonifacio’s men.28
c. 22-23 Bonifacio and his group leave Indang población and move to the barrio of
Apr Limbon, about three kilometers to the east, where they constructed a
fortified encampment beside a small creek.
Obtaining food for their own needs became less of a problem. They were
slightly better off than in the town, Gregoria de Jesus recalled, because
people in the barrio had given them rice that was not unpolished (“bigas
na hindi pinawa”).29 Rice and other essentials were also obtained from
barrios further afield, in San Francisco de Malabon.30
The supplies, however, were far too limited to meet the demands of
another, much larger group that had arrived in the same vicinity. The
sources tell us very little about who these people were, or where they
came from. “Together with us,” Bonifacio wrote to Jacinto, is “a crowd of
about a thousand bolomen” (“Kaakbay rin naman namin ang makapal na
sandatahan na may mga isang libo...”).31 Alvarez, though, says the multitude
also included women, children and elderly people.32 The majority, it
might be surmised, were Katipuneros and their relatives who had gone to
Cavite to seek refuge from Spanish repression in and around Manila.
Most had probably been living in the towns of northern Cavite. When the
Spaniards had retaken those towns, the people had retreated with the
revolutionary armies to the south, but they now just wanted to go back
home.
c.19-22 In the aftermath of the fateful meeting at the casa hacienda in Naic,
Apr meanwhile, Aguinaldo moved decisively and adroitly to assert his
leadership. He spoke that same night to the two Magdalo generals who
8
had attended the meeting, Mariano Noriel and Pio del Pilar. They had
remained in estate house when Bonifacio and the Magdiwang leaders
had suddenly departed. The allegations made by Bonifacio, Aguinaldo
assured them, were lies. He forgave the generals. He bore no grudges
against them, he said, and would not punish them in any way, not even
strip them of their rank.34 Relieved and thankful, they returned ardently
to his side.
23 Apr Exactly a month after they had joined Andres Bonifacio in signing the
“Acta de Tejeros” nullifying the Tejeros convention, Magdiwang
president Mariano Alvarez and secretary Jacinto Lumbreras make a total
volte face. Aguinaldo’s election as “Presidente,” they accept, had been
legitimate after all.
9
Riego de Dios as Director de Guerra; and Artemio Ricarte as General en
Jefe), so in total the Magdiwang filled seven of the nine key posts in the
new government. Only the two Aguinaldos (Emilio as Presidente and
Baldomero as Director de Hacienda) had been members of the Magdalo
council.
Just a few days earlier, Trias, Ricarte, Mariano Alvarez, Lumbreras and
De las Alas had sworn before God to implement the “Naic Military
Agreement”. They had plotted to depose Aguinaldo. Now they were
ready to swear before God to serve Aguinaldo, their “Illustrious and
Distinguished President (“Marilag at Dakilang Presidente”).37
24 Apr Mariano Alvarez and the other new ministers swear their oaths of office,
and the cabinet holds its first session.38
24 Apr Aguinaldo receives reports from Indang president Severino de las Alas
and others that Bonifacio and his followers are causing distress and
turmoil in the town.42
Bonifacio, the reports say, had threatened to burn down the población
because his troops had been refused food. Now he was in barrio Limbon,
with a thousand people or more. He had told the multitude he could not
feed them, and they were getting their own food by whatever means they
could. Having little or no money, many either had to starve or to steal.
They had raided palay stores, thieved fruit and vegetables, and taken
away carabao and other farm animals to slaughter for their meat. The poor
farmers and townspeople were distraught, one prominent citizen wrote;
10
their livelihoods were being devastated by banditry (“buhay tulisan”) and
disorder (“kagulo”).43
To put a stop to the abuses, Aguinaldo recalls, Severino de las Alas asked
him to send troops “to fight the Supremo” (“humingi ng tropa upang
bakahin ang Supremo dahil sa masama niyang ginawa sa taong bayan”).44
24 Apr Bonifacio knows his life is in serious danger - not so much from the
Spanish enemy, he confides in a letter to Jacinto, as from the “leaders
here, most of whom have wicked intentions” (“hindi lamang sa kaaway na
Kastila nanganganib ang amin buhay kun di lalo’t higit pa sa mga pinuno dito
na ang karamiha’y may masasamang kilos”). “We urgently want to get out of
this place” (“pagpupumilit na mapaalis dito”), he writes.
24 Apr Bonifacio sends a similar letter to Julio Nakpil, asking him to send
Antonino Guevara back to Cavite immediately, “so that we can take the
necessary action as soon as possible (“upang magawa sa madaling panahon
ang nararapat.”)
The revolutionists in the north, Bonifacio tells Nakpil, should not let their
spirits be broken by the Spanish victories in Cavite. His own mood is still
optimistic. Overall, he says, the revolution in the south “is spreading and
getting much stronger due to the towns of Batangas and Laguna crossing
over (“tumawid”), and perhaps Tayabas, Mindoro and Camarines will
cross over too.”48
Aguinaldo orders that Bonifacio and his group be arrested and brought to
Naic. Their lawlessness in Indang, he felt, was not just unacceptable, it
also showed their contempt for the new government’s authority. They
were traitors. His ministers and leading advisers, he says, all took the
same view.
11
To implement the arrest order, Aguinaldo assigns three Magdalo colonels
to proceed to Limbon with half a battalion of troops – about 300 men. He
is anxious about sending such a large force, because the men might be
needed at any moment to defend Naic against Spanish attack. But it is
Bonifacio’s capture, he decides, that must be his priority.
27 Apr Bonifacio sends a brief note to the man who had first invited him to
Cavite some six months earlier, his wife’s relative, Mariano Alvarez.
Seemingly unaware that Alvarez had now abandoned his opposition to
the republic, and had accepted a seat in Aguinaldo’s cabinet, Bonifacio
beseeches Alvarez to send food supplies to him and his men – “the loyal
soldiers of the Mother Country” - without delay, in keeping with a
promise he had given a week or so earlier when Bonifacio had left Naic in
a state of disquiet (“bilang katuparan nang pangako niniyong tulong sa aking
balisang pag alis.”)
c.27 Apr Bonifacio is said to have issued an order declaring null and void all
appointments of Katipunan leaders in Cavite except Diego Mojica, Santos
Nocon, Artemio Ricarte, Silvestre Domingo and a few others.51 It seems
unlikely that this order was ever circulated.
27 Apr Bonifacio and his close associates were in peril. So why was he still in
Cavite, on April 27? Why had he not headed off to Balara, or anywhere
else that might have been less dangerous?
On April 24, we noted above, Bonifacio had written to Jacinto and Nakpil
saying that he was waiting for his emissary Antonino Guevara to report
back to him on whether they thought it would be possible to mount
attacks in Laguna. Very soon after Bonifacio had sent those letters,
however, perhaps the same day, Guevara did arrive in Limbon, almost
certainly bringing the news that Jacinto and Nakpil were not able to send
troops to Laguna at that time.53
12
But still Bonifacio did not leave. He was now waiting for guides
(“magtuturo ng daan”) who knew a safe route to the north.54 This further
delay was to cost him his life.
Colonel Bonzon and his companions stayed for a while to eat. They
pretended they were going off on a reconnaissance mission, and when
they left, Bonifacio later recalled, he gave them some packs of cigarettes.
Everything seemed fine – “naghiualay sila ng mahusay”.58
But soon afterwards Bonifacio got reports that the troops had disarmed
and detained some of his men, and had closed the exit from the
encampment. Guards had now been posted at the exit, with orders not to
allow any member of the family or soldier of Bonifacio to pass, on pain of
death.59 Bonifacio repeatedly sent word to the troops’ commanders
demanding an explanation, but his protests were ignored.60
28 Apr “At dawn they started shooting,” Gregoria de Jesus related, “and there
was more gunfire away on the other side. I woke him [Bonifacio] up, and
when he went downstairs he met a soldier who told him that the
commotion had been caused by advancing troops, who he said were
already near…[Bonifacio went outside and] ordered our soldiers not to
return their fire…. and all our people shouted out [to the troops]:
“Brothers, don’t shoot; let us talk in peace about what you want.”
(“…nating kasamahang mga kapatid huag kayong puputok at magusap usap
tayong mahusay kung ano ang inyong gusto”).61
13
“and when they were close they fired a volley at him [Bonifacio].” He was
hit in the left arm. When he fell, one of the officers stabbed him in the
throat (“lalamunan”) and he was beaten with rifle butts. His brother
Ciriaco, who reportedly started firing back at the troops, was shot dead.
Procopio was beaten and hogtied.62
Aguinaldo refers the report back to Noriel, and orders him to appoint an
officer with the rank of colonel to investigate the case, interrogate
witnesses, including the accused, and then make a recommendation as to
whether Andres and Procopio Bonifacio should be put on trial before a
Council of War. Noriel appoints Colonel Pantaleon Garcia as the
investigator (juez instructor). 65
29 Apr Aguinaldo’s troops take Bonifacio and his wife from Indang to Naic.67
On the first day, Garcia questions two prisoners - Benito Torres (a Balara
comandante) and Procopio Bonifacio.68
29 Apr Ariston Villanueva, Diego Mojica and other Magdiwang leaders who had
not joined Aguinaldo’s government meet in barrio Malainin, Naic to
discuss how to rescue the Bonifacio brothers. They agree that a large force
of bolomen (“gulukan”) should go to the Naic estate house – where the
brothers were being held – on the pretense that they had been sent to
reinforce the infantry on guard there. At a given signal, the bolomen
would attack the infantrymen, capture their weapons, take control of the
14
building, and free the prisoners (“at sa isang hudyat ay magsasabay-sabay ng
biglang pagkilos, pag-agaw ng mga baril, ng mga kuta at pagliligtas sa Supremo
Bonifacio”).
The plan is said to have been abandoned because Naic came under
Spanish attack in the next few days. But perhaps there were other reasons
too. A plot that pitted bolomen against riflemen, the plotters may have
been concluded, had very little chance of success. They may also have
feared, as Alvarez did, that a rescue attempt could raise the specter of
“guerra civil,” of “brother fighting brother, when our blood and our lives
should be consecrated to no other purpose than the Liberty of the
Motherland.” 69
30 Apr Colonel Garcia interrogates ten more of Bonifacio’s troops. Each of them
was asked more or less the same questions – “Did you know there was a
revolutionary government and army in the province?”; “Did Bonifacio
have authority from the government to have an army?; and “What
meetings did Bonifacio have whilst he was in Limbon?” Most of the
soldiers replied that they did know a government and army existed, and
that they did not know of any authority Bonifacio had been given to
organize an army. Some of them said Bonifacio had met the Magdiwang
leaders Diego Mojica and Santos Nocon, amongst others.70
The most senior of the soldiers, with the rank of lieutenant colonel, was
Pedro Giron.71 He testified that Bonifacio had given him 10 pesos to kill
Emilio Aguinaldo if the latter did not agree to submit himself to
Bonifacio’s authority.72
1 May The lull in the Spanish offensive ends. The Lachambre division as
originally constituted had been dissolved following the fall of Imus,
Noveleta and San Francisco de Malabon, but on May 1 the new governor
general, Fernando Primo de Rivera, set up his headquarters with a
brigade in Silang to augment the brigade based in San Francisco de
Malabon.73
Naic, for the past three weeks the “revolutionary capital,” was evidently
to be the Spaniards’ next objective. Aguinaldo prepares to defend the
town, and orders non-combatants to withdraw to Maragondon, about six
kilometers to the southwest. The investigation into Andres and Procopio
Bonifacio’s alleged crimes is suspended, and the prisoners are transferred
from Naic to Maragondon.
3 May Spanish forces attack and capture Naic, with 400 defenders reportedly
killed. The survivors, including Aguinaldo, retreat to join the
revolutionists already in Maragondon – their last stronghold.74
15
Bonifacio is described in the record as “President of the Revolution and
head (“puno”) of the Katipunan”. Asked whether he knows that a
government had been formed, and that Aguinaldo had sworn his oath of
office as president, he replies that the decisions taken at the Tejeros
convention had been annulled, and that he had heard nothing about
another government (“iba pang Pamahalaan”) having been formed since
that time. That being the case, he had not informed any “government”
about gathering (“pagtitipon”) his troops in Limbon. And, he stressed,
they were his own troops, who he had brought to Cavite in the first place.
The Magdiwang council, he said, was aware he was preparing to leave
the province with his troops.
Bonifacio was also questioned about the firearms his troops had with
them in Limbon. On the first day of the investigation, Garcia had asked
for these guns to be inventoried, and they comprised 14 Remington rifles,
2 Mauser rifles, and 12 less powerful weapons, mostly shotguns. On two
of the rifles the “Magdalo” mark was visible. Bonifacio replied that he
believed the weapons were all his, but in any event he had brought many
more rifles into the province – about 50 – than his riflemen carried when
they were intending to leave.
4 May Garcia calls as his final witness Gregoria de Jesus. He asks her whether
she knew there was a President of the archipelago (“sangkapuluan”), and
she answers “No”.
16
pinapapanaog na lahat ang tao at ipinapapanhik ang nagsasaysay…”)77
Garcia specifically reiterates Pedro Giron’s claim that Bonifacio had given
him 10 pesos to assassinate Aguinaldo – a claim that General Noriel had
omitted from the list of charges he put to the Consejo on May 6, perhaps
because he considered it implausible.
The Council first asks the secretary to the investigation, Major Lazaro
17
Macapagal, to read out (“binasa ng buong lacas”) the witness statements
and other documents. This must have taken quite a long time.84
José Elises then makes the case for the prosecution. Andres Bonifacio, he
says, planned to overthrow the revolutionary government; induced Pedro
Giron to assassinate the president; and ordered his soldiers to be ready to
open fire on government troops. Procopio was his accomplice. They were
traitors (“tacsil”). They deserved to be shot, he specified in precise detail,
“by musketry in a public place, five rounds for each of the brothers at a
distance of ten paces in accordance with the gravity of their crimes”.
(“…ipa baril sa isang lansangan hayag hangang limang putoc bauat isa sa mag
capatid, layong sampung hacbang sang ayon sa bigat ng canilang casalanan”.)85
6 May The Council of War meets to discuss its judgment. General Noriel asks
his colleagues a series of questions about the charges against the
defendants. They respond, unanimously, as follows:
18
• Andres Bonifacio did not have permission from the government to
assemble soldiers, to hold firearms, or to detain people in the
barrio of Limbon.
• Andres Bonifacio and his brothers Procopio and Ciriaco did order
their soldiers to be prepared to fire on government troops.89
Most historians agree that Andres Bonifacio and his brother were not
given a fair hearing. The Council of War, says Teodoro Kalaw, “could be
charged with partiality because it was composed of men of only one
side.”91 Two of its members - Mariano Noriel, its president, and Tomas
Mascardo - were senior Magdalo generals, and had probably been among
the generals who, Aguinaldo recalls, believed the Bonifacio brothers
should have been shot without trial. The other members of the Consejo
were mostly prominent citizens of Maragondon, a town that was
nominally in the Magdiwang zone but whose Katipunan leaders had
switched their allegiance to Aguinaldo long before the Republic had been
proclaimed on April 24.
19
The Bonifacio brothers were not given a proper opportunity to challenge
or refute the allegations. The Consejo adopted Spanish military rules and
conventions, which meant the Bonifacio brothers were not allowed to
confront or cross-examine the witnesses.95 Placido Martinez, the counsel
assigned to Andres Bonifacio, was hopeless. His appeal, in Justice
Sarmiento’s words, “was not only in violation of [a lawyer’s] sworn duty
to ‘serve his client with competence and diligence,’ it was an act that came
on the edge of bad faith.96 And as Quirino points out, Martinez’s
designation as a defense counsel when he was actually a member of the
Consejo de Guerra was, “to say the least, anomalous”.97 Even the counsel
assigned to Procopio, the trial record suggests, did nothing more than
flatly deny the charges against his client.
That was still the case, Bonifacio could have said, when he left the town of
Naic on April 20 or thereabouts. It was therefore still the case in the days
prior to his departure, when he had persuaded some of the army officers
then in Naic to “switch sides”.
Bonifacio could have opened this can of worms, had he been given the
chance. If his plan to unite the Katipunan army had been treasonous, he
might have asked, why had figures like Noriel, Trias, Ricarte been
20
involved? Were they traitors too? If so, why weren’t they also on trial for
their lives? But no, Bonifacio could have argued, they were not traitors,
because they knew, just as he knew, that the government discussed at
Tejeros and Tanza had not come into being.
By the time of his trial, if not sooner, Bonifacio must have learned that on
April 24 the Republic had been proclaimed and Aguinaldo had
announced his assumption of presidential powers. With the assent of the
Magdiwang leaders, Aguinaldo had revalidated the Tejeros elections he
had previously declared void. Bonifacio, of course, believed Tejeros had
been consigned to oblivion for all time, never to be resurrected. But the
fact that Aguinaldo had not assumed office until April 24, he might have
argued in his defense, proved there had been no government before then.
How could treason be committed against a government that did not
exist? By the time the government had been formed, Bonifacio could have
said, he and his brothers were already encamped peaceably with their
group in Limbon, waiting only for the arrival of guides who could lead
them safely out of Cavite.
7 May The documents of the investigation and the Council of War’s judgment
are transmitted to Emilio Aguinaldo, and he in turn transmits them to the
auditor, his cousin Baldomero Aguinaldo.100
8 May Baldomero Aguinaldo, like Council of War president Mariano Noriel and
member Tomas Mascardo, was a senior Magdalo general, and he too had
probably been among the generals who, his cousin Emilio recalls,
believed the Bonifacio brothers should have been shot without trial.
When “auditing” the case documents, he added a little embroidery of his
own. Andres and Procopio Bonifacio, he says, had assembled soldiers in
Limbon in order to overthrow the government and kill the president. This
had been confirmed, he lied, by Bonifacio’s “own men, Pedro Giron,
Benito Torres, Bibiano Rojas and others whose names are too numerous
to mention here.” In truth, these allegations had been made by a single
witness – Pedro Giron, the self-purported non-assassin.
Emilio Aguinaldo says in his memoirs that he pitied the condemned men.
He also wanted the stain (“dungis”) of disunity in revolutionary ranks to
be concealed, and he thought their deaths would serve no purpose
(“walang kapararakan”).102 He accordingly decided “to pardon Andres
Bonifacio and Procopio Bonifacio from the penalty of death and to change
the sentence to indefinite exile, “to be served in a suitable place where
they will be guarded by prison officials and not allowed to talk to each
other and likewise to other persons....”103
21
Lazaro Makapagal formally notifies the Bonifacio brothers that their
death sentence has been commuted.104
Andres and Procopio Bonifacio were not told that the commutation order
had been rescinded.
8-9 May Gregoria de Jesus wasn’t told either, but she had a foreboding the death
sentence might be reinstated, and she was extremely anxious. She asked
various chiefs (“ibang pinuno”) what was to happen, and they told her not
to worry.
On the evening of May 9, whilst she was at the house where her husband
and brother-in-law were detained, a detachment of troops arrived with
orders to take the two prisoners away. Gregoria beseeched the comandante
– Lazaro Makapagal – to wait until the morning because it was teeming
with rain and her husband was sick. Makapagal said he had to follow his
orders. She persisted. The only way she could get the order changed, she
was told, was to make her plea to Aguinaldo himself. In that case, she
said, she would try. With two women companions she walked and
scrambled through the darkness and rain to Aguinaldo’s house.
When she got there, Aguinaldo’s staff told her she couldn’t see him. They
told her he was unwell and sleeping, but that was a lie. She could hear
Aguinaldo talking to someone in his room. Anyway, she was told,
22
Makapagal’s orders would not be changed. She was placed under guard
and taken first to the Tribunal, and then to the town president’s house. To
prevent her from causing any further trouble, she was kept there under
house arrest until the following afternoon.108
10 May Early in the morning, General Mariano Noriel summoned Major Lazaro
Makapagal and ordered him to get four riflemen from the barracks.
Makapagal and the riflemen were then to collect the Bonifacio brothers
and take them, with the aid of a guide, to the foot of Mount Tala to the
south of Maragondon. Noriel gave the major a sealed envelope which he
said contained further instructions, but which was not to be opened until
the group had reached “Maytala”. Makapagal was then to read the note
aloud, so the prisoners could hear. 109
After they had walked for an hour or so, the brothers asked to rest for a
while, and the group sat down at the foot of a hill. Andres Bonifacio then
asked Makapagal to open the sealed envelope. Makapagal agreed, and
read the note out loud. Andres and Procopio Bonifacio, it said, were to be
shot to death, as decided by the Council of War. It ordered Makapagal to
carry out the sentence, and warned him he would be court-martialed if he
did not. It was signed by General Mariano Noriel.
Procopio was shot first, and then Andres. They were buried in shallow
graves dug with bolos and bayonets, and covered with soil and twigs.
10 May Gregoria de Jesus was released from house arrest in Maragondon at about
the same time as her husband and brother-in-law were killed. She
hurried off immediately in the direction they had been taken, and met
Makapagal and the riflemen as they were coming back. Together with
them was one of Aguinaldo’s advisers, Clemente José Zulueta, and a
Spanish prisoner, a cazador named Juan Marinio, who was carrying her
husband’s clothes and shoes.110
She asked them what had happened. They told her they had left the
brothers in the mountains, in the house of a teniente del barrio. She asked
them why they were carrying her husband’s clothes. They told her that he
wanted her to bring them to him.111
23
Bonifacio’s executioners were not even able to tell her what they had
done. They left her with the false hope that he was still alive, and let her
roam for days and weeks in the mountains, vainly searching for him.112
Gregoria wrote about the tragedy whilst her pain was still fresh and raw.
“Ay my brothers! Just think, brothers, whether or not there was justice in
the cruelty they committed against us.” (“Ay mga kapd. kaya isipin ninyo
mga kapd. kung katoiran o hindi ang kanilang ginagawa pag api sa amin.”)113
Jim Richardson
Revised April 2021
24
CAVITE, 1897
Detail from “Provincia de Cavite y Region Limitrofe” (1897) [Biblioteca Virtual de Defensa]
PICTURE SOURCES
1 Andres Bonifacio, Notice of appointment, April 15, 1897, in Teodoro A. Agoncillo, The Revolt of the Masses:
The story of Bonifacio and the Katipunan (Quezon City: University of the Philippines, 1956), 187.
2 Glenn Anthony May, Battle for Batangas: A Philippine province at war (New Haven and London: Yale
University Press, 1991), 58; Doroteo Abaya and Bernard Karganilla, Miguel Malvar and the Philippine
Revolution (Manila [?]: Miguel Malvar (MM) Productions, 1998), 51; 69.
3 Artemio Ricarte confirms he went to Batangas around this time, but it seems he did not leave Cavite until
a few days after the April 16 date of Bonifacio’s letter – he was a signatory to the “Naic Military
Agreement,” which according to Aguinaldo was written on April 19. Artemio Ricarte, Himagsikan nang
manga Pilipino laban sa Kastila. (Yokohama: Karihan Café, 1927), 68-9; Emilio Aguinaldo, Mga gunita ng
himagsikan (Manila: Cristina Aguinaldo Suntay, 1964), 206.
4 Andres Bonifacio, Letter to Emilio Jacinto, April 16, 1897, in Adrian E. Cristobal, The Tragedy of the
Microfilm reel 84]; Miguel Malvar, Letter to Emilio Aguinaldo, April 17, 1897 [Philippine Revolutionary
Records, P7] cited in May, Battle for Batangas, 58–9; Santiago Rillo de Leon, Letter to Emilio Aguinaldo,
April 14, 1897 [Philippine Insurgent Records, Books A.4; Microfilm reel 83].
6 Andres Bonifacio, Letter to Emilio Jacinto, April 16, 1897, in Cristobal, Tragedy of the Revolution, 146-7.
7 Andres Bonifacio, Letter to Julio Nakpil, April 24, 1897 [Archivo General Militar de Madrid: Caja 5677,
leg.1.129].
8 The essence of Bonifacio’s case has been paraphrased here from an unsympathetic source – Emilio
Aguinaldo’s own memoirs. Aguinaldo’s recollection is nevertheless compatible with what we know from
other sources about Bonifacio’s thoughts and feelings in mid-April 1897. Aguinaldo, Mga gunita, 201.
9 The declaration Cayetano Topacio made when the case was investigated is kept in the Madrid military
archives, but none of the other case papers. The formal outcome of the investigation is not known.
Cayetano Topacio, Declaration dated April 10, 1897 [Archivo General Militar de Madrid: Caja 5677,
leg.1.129].
10 Bonifacio, Letter to Emilio Jacinto, April 24, 1897, in Cristobal, Tragedy of the Revolution, 146-7.
11 Aguinaldo, Mga gunita, 201.
12 Andres Bonifacio and others, Declaration, c. April 19, 1897 (“The Naic Military Agreement”). [Private
collection]. Isagani Medina includes a more-or-less accurate version of the Tagalog text in his edition of
Carlos Ronquillo’s memoir, but he modernizes its orthography – “binago ko ang pagbaybay.” Carlos
Ronquillo, Ilang talata tungkol sa paghihimagsik nang 1896-1897, edited by Isagani R. Medina (Quezon City:
University of the Philippines Press, 1996), 109-12.
13 Lazaro Makapagal, Untitled memoir in Tagalog, c.1930s, in Pedro S. de Achutegui SJ and Miguel A.
Bernad SJ, Aguinaldo and the Revolution of 1896: A documentary history (Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila,
1972), Achutegui and Bernad, 198–205. It is Aguinaldo’s account that says the meeting was held on April
19.
14 From the memoirs of Makapagal and Aguinaldo it is not entirely clear what the conspirators at the casa
hacienda hoped to achieve by detaining the Magdalo soldiers – perhaps they intended that General Pio del
Pilar would shortly address them all, and convince them to join the ranks of the new army under his
command.
15 Aguinaldo, Mga gunita, 200.
16 Ibid., 201-2; Lazaro Makapagal, Untitled memoir, as cited, 367; 370; Lazaro Makapagal, “Biografía de
Ocampo from a photocopy of the document, appended to his “Andres Bonifacio: Mito o Realidad?” First
Annual Andres Bonifacio/ Parian Lectures, Bulwagang Katipunan, Manila City Hall, November 29, 1989
(mimeograph), n.pp.
20 In 1907, Aguinaldo hinted at a financial explanation. Bonifacio, he wrote, “held the revolutionary funds,
which then amounted to P18,000 pesos, with the result that the soldiers in his section of the country received
their scant pay with some regularity while Magdalo, almost without funds, could only pay its men at irregular
intervals. The fighting men were therefore eager to serve under Bonifacio.” Aguinaldo did not repeat this
assertion in his later memoirs, and corroboration has not been found in other sources. In the absence of
26
alternative explanations, however, it is possible that funds were a critical factor. “Statement of Emilio
Aguinaldo regarding the revolutionary movement in Cavite and the death of Andres Bonifacio,” November 9,
1907, in Memoirs of General Artemio Ricarte, Manila: National Heroes Commission, 1963), 225.
21 Makapagal, “Biografía de Andrés Bonifacio,“ as cited.
22 Antonino Guevara, “Unang Bugso ng Panghihimagsik,” in Dalomag [Emilio Aguinaldo], “Sa
Carolina S. Malay (Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press, 1992), 332.
26 Ibid.
27 Ibid.
28 Aguinaldo, Mga gunita, 209.
29 De Bonifacio, “Kasulatan,” as cited.
30 Julian Aguila and Domingo San Juan, Declarations dated April 30, 1897 in The Trial of Andres Bonifacio:
The original documents in Tagalog text and English translation, translated by Virginia Palma-Bonifacio (Manila:
Ateneo de Manila, 1963), 15A; 24-24A (page numbers refer to the original documents, which are
reproduced in the appendix).
31 Bonifacio, Letter to Emilio Jacinto, April 24, 1897, as cited.
32 Alvarez, The Katipunan and the Revolution, 331.
33 Ibid., 331-2.
34 Aguinaldo, Mga gunita, 204-5.
35 Antonio Virata, Letter to Mariano Noriel, April 22, 1897 [Philippine Insurgent Records, AGO 460111-145.
(Microfilm reel 84)]. Written exactly one month after the Tejeros convention, this letter still refers to
Aguinaldo as the “Pangulong Digma sa Magdalo,” not as “Presidente”.
36 M.A. Mainam (Mariano Alvarez) and others, Declaration dated Naic, April 23, 1897 [Philippine
Insurgent Records, AGO 460111-125 (Microfilm reel 84)]. The other signatories were Vice-President-elect
Mariano Trias (who as member of the Magdiwang Council himself may have acted as a mediator on
Aguinaldo’s behalf), Jacinto Lumbreras, Pascual Alvarez, Cornelio Magsarili, and Ambrosio Mojica.
37 Signed oaths of office dated Naic, April 24, 1897 [Philippine Insurgent Records, AGO 460111-173
(Mariano Alvarez); AGO 460111-174 (Emiliano Riego de Dios); AGO 460111-176 (Pascual Alvarez); and
AGO 460111-177 (Jacinto Lumbreras). (All on Microfilm reel 84)]. Severino de las Alas took his oath of
office two days later.
38 Draft minutes of cabinet meeting, April 24, 1897 [Philippine Insurgent Records, AGO 460111-190
AGO 460111-63 (Microfilm reel 84)]. The document bears the date “24-3-97,” but this must be an error.
44 Aguinaldo, Mga gunita ng himagsikan, 209.
45 Bonifacio, Letter to Emilio Jacinto, April 24, 1897, as cited. In the body of his letter, Bonifacio says he is
“Halang,” but above his signature he gives his location as “Limbon”. This could conceivably mean he
started the letter in one place and finished it in another, but in any event the two barrios are only a couple
of kilometers apart.
46 Bonifacio, Letter to Emilio Jacinto, April 24, 1897, as cited; Bonifacio, Letter to Julio Nakpil, April 24,
1897, as cited. The letter to Jacinto refers only in general terms to “what we are planning,” but the letter to
Nakpil refers specifically to “our planned attack in Silangan,” meaning Laguna.
47 Once again, the exact sequence of events here is uncertain, and puzzling. The letter Bonifacio gave to
Guevara to take to Jacinto is dated “Naik, April 16, 1897,” but Guevara might not have left Naic for Pasig
until a few days later. Guevara was one of the signatories to the “Naic Military Agreement,” which most
historians say (following Aguinaldo) was drawn up on the evening of April 19. If Guevara did not leave
Naic until April 20, however, the “delay” in his return that worried Bonifacio can only have been brief. In
his own memoir, Guevara gives a very interesting account of his trip to Pasig, but his chronology, alas, is
confused to the point of being self-contradictory. The best guess we can make is that Guevara reached
27
Limbon and reported back on his mission very soon after Bonifacio had despatched his follow-up letter to
Jacinto on April 24, perhaps that same day. Guevara, “Unang Bugso ng Panghihimagsik,” as cited.
48 Bonifacio, Letter to Julio Nakpil, April 24, 1897, as cited.
49 Aguinaldo, Mga gunita, 209.
50 Andres Bonifacio, Note to Mariano Alvarez, April 27, 1897, in José P. Santos, Si Bonifacio at ang himagsikan
(Manila: n.pub, 1935), 26. This note has to be regarded with a little caution because neither the original nor
photographs can now be found. Its content, however, does not give any reason to doubt its authenticity.
51 Antonino Guevara, Letter to Emilio Jacinto, May 3, 1897, quoted in Epifanio de los Santos, “Andres
Bonifacio” [Spanish version], Philippine Review (Revista Filipina), II:11 (November 1917), 74. The full text of
this letter has regrettably never been published, and the letter’s present whereabouts are unknown. It was
sold at an auction held by the Bayanihan Collectors Club in 2011.
52 De los Santos, “Andres Bonifacio,” 74.
53 Guevara, “Unang Bugso ng Panghihimagsik,” as cited.
54 Procopio Bonifacio, Declaration dated April 29, 1897; and Andres Bonifacio, Declaration dated May 4,
1897, in The Trial of Andres Bonifacio, 8A and 27A. Procopio specifies in his declaration that the guides were
to lead the group to Balara.
55 Aguinaldo, Mga gunita, 209.
56 Benito Torres, Declaration dated April 29, 1897, in The Trial of Andres Bonifacio: The original documents, 6.
57 Antonino Guevara, Letter to Emilio Jacinto, May 3, 1897, as cited.
58 Andres Bonifacio, Declaration dated May 4, 1897, in The Trial of Andres Bonifacio: The original documents,
29.
59 De Bonifacio, “Kasulatan,” as cited.
60 Andres Bonifacio, Declaration dated May 4, 1897, in The Trial of Andres Bonifacio: The original documents,
29.
61 De Bonifacio,” “Kasulatan,” as cited.
62 Ibid.; Andres Bonifacio, Declaration dated May 4, 1897, in The Trial of Andres Bonifacio: The original
documents, 30a. Colonel Bonzon’s version of events was very different – Bonifacio, he said, had “acted in
the hostile manner of an enemy, and ordered his men to fire. Our men were forced to fire back…” Three of
Bonifacio’s group (Benito Torres, Pedro Giron and Bibiano Rojas) later testified that Ciriaco Bonifacio had
been the first to fire, but two others (Antonino Guevara and Francisco Carreon) recalled it had been
Aguinaldo’s troops. Testimonies of Benito Torres (April 29), Bibiano Rojas (April 30) and Pedro Giron
(April 30) in The Trial of Andres Bonifacio: The original documents, 5a, 19, 22a; Antonino Guevara, Letter to
Emilio Jacinto, May 3, 1897, as cited; and Francisco Carreon, “Maikling salaysay ng aking buhay” (ms; n.d)
cited in Agoncillo, Revolt of the Masses, 240.
63 Mariano Noriel, Note to Emilio Aguinaldo, April 28, 1897, in The Trial of Andres Bonifacio: The original
documents, 1-2.
64 Ibid.
65 Emilio Aguinaldo, Order dated April 28, 1897, in ibid., 2a; Mariano Noriel, Note dated April 28, 1897, in
ibid., 3-3a.
66 Aguinaldo, Mga gunita, 212-5.
67 De Bonifacio, “Kasulatan,” as cited; Pantaleon Garcia, Maikling kasaysayan ng himagsikan sa Pilipinas
29, 1897, in ibid., 8; Julian Aguila, Declaration dated April 30, 1897, in ibid., 15a.
72 Pedro Giron, Declaration dated April 30, 1897, in ibid., 21. Gregoria de Jesus alleges that Pedro Giron
was bribed to testify against Bonifacio and threatened with execution if he did not. De Bonifacio,
“Kasulatan,” as cited.
73 Marconi M. Dioso, A Trilogy of Wars, (Pittsburgh: Dorrance Publishing Co., 2004), 192-3.
74 Ibid., 199-200.
75 De Bonifacio, “Kasulatan,” as cited.
76 Andres Bonifacio, Declaration dated May 4, 1897, in The Trial of Andres Bonifacio: The original documents,
27-31.
77 Gregoria de Jesus, Declaration dated May 4, 1897, in ibid., 32a-33a.
78 Consejo de Guerra, Record of Proceedings, May 5, 1897, in ibid., 38.
28
79 Pantaleon Garcia, Note to Emilio Aguinaldo dated May 4, 1897, in ibid., 35-35a.
80 Carlos Quirino, “Historical Introduction,” in ibid., 25.
81 Pantaleon Garcia, Note to Emilio Aguinaldo dated May 4, 1897, in ibid., 35.
82 Emilio Aguinaldo, Note dated May 4, 1897 in ibid., 36.
83 Mariano Noriel, Note dated May 4, 1897 in ibid., 36.
84 Consejo de Guerra, Record of Proceedings, May 5, 1897, in ibid., 37.
85 Ibid., 37a.
86 Ibid., 38.
87 Ibid., 39a-40.
88 Ibid., 40.
89 It was not alleged that Andres and Procopio themselves had fired at the troops. Not one bullet, Andres
testified, had been spent from his revolver Andres Bonifacio, Declaration dated May 4, 1897, in The Trial of
Andres Bonifacio: The original documents, 31.
90 Ibid., 40a-41a.
91 The court martial of Andres Bonifacio, with prefatory note by Teodoro M. Kalaw and translated into English
from the original Tagalog by Paz Policarpio, (Manila: Manila Book Co., 1926), xii.
92 Agoncillo, Revolt of the Masses, 300-1.
93 Quirino, “Historical Introduction,” as cited, 26.
94 Abraham F. Sarmiento, The Trial of Andres Bonifacio: The appeal (Quezon City: University of the
31a.
99 Trias, Letter to the President in Mapagibig (Amadeo), as cited.
100 Mariano Noriel, Note to Emilio Aguinaldo, May 7, 1897, in The Trial of Andres Bonifacio: The original
documents, 43a.
101 Baldomero Aguinaldo, Letter to Emilio Aguinaldo, May 8, 1897, in ibid., 44-45a.
102 Aguinaldo, Mga gunita, 225-6.
103 Pangulohan ng Sangkatagalugan at sa Hokbo, Decision dated May 8, 1897, in The Trial of Andres
Masses, 292.
106 Epifanio de los Santos, “Andrés Bonifacio” [English version], Philippine Review (Revista Filipina), III:1-2
30-3. [Also published in translation as “How We Executed Bonifacio,” Philippines Free Press, November 29,
1929.] Makapagal told the sad story on a few occasions. His accounts vary in detail, but not on the date,
place and basic sequence of events. See also, for example, “Bonifacio’s Execution – Told by his
Executioner,” Philippines Free Press, December 1, 1928; Extracts from an account Makapagal wrote for the
Veteranos de la Revolución (translated from the Spanish) in José P. Santos, Ang mahiwagang pagkapatay kay
Andres Bonifacio (Manila [?]: n.pub, 1935), 17-8; and Lazaro Makapagal, “Biografía de Andres Bonifacio,“ in
Dalomag [Emilio Aguinaldo], “Sa pinakamahalagang kabuhayan ng ama ng Katipunan, dakilang Andres
Bonifacio,” unpublished typescript, 1948, n.pp.
110 Gregoria de Jesus, Letter to José P. Santos, June 2, 1929 in Tenepe [José P. Santos, Teresita Santos and
Nena Santos], “Si Andres Bonifacio at ang Katipunan,” unpublished manuscript, 1948, 168. De Jesus says
Zulueta was involved in the execution - “Ang nagsiganap sa pagbaril ay si Lazaro Makapagal na katulong si Jose
Zulueta - and other sources say explicitly that he was present. Makapagal does not name the riflemen in
any of his accounts, and Zulueta was perhaps one of them. Others in the squad were later said to have been
Isidro Concepcion and Leon Ramirez, both from Bacoor, and Leon Novenario from Pateros. Epifanio de
los Santos, “Andrés Bonifacio” [English version], 51; José P. Santos, Ang mahiwagang pagkapatay kay Andres
Bonifacio (Manila [?]: n.pub, 1935), 18; and José P. Bantug, Letter to José P. Santos, April 12, 1928, in José P.
Santos, Mga kasulatang lumiliwanag sa pagkakapatay kay Andres Bonifacio (Manila [?]: n.pub. 1935), 39.
29
111 De Bonifacio, “Kasulatan,” as cited. Makapagal also recalled the encounter. He told her a lie, he
admitted, “but out of pity I had to lie, realizing that the truth at that moment would kill her. What else
could I have told her when I pitied her so?” Lazaro Makapagal, Letter to José P. Santos, June 27, 1929, as
cited.
112 De Bonifacio, “Kasulatan,” as cited.
113 Ibid.
--------------
Responsibility for errors in these notes is not entirely mine. Many of the errors are embedded in the sources.
30