Finnish Corporate Governance Code
Finnish Corporate Governance Code
Finnish Corporate Governance Code
Governance Code
2010
Finnish Corporate Governance Code
N.B. This is an unofficial translation. In case of any discrepancy between the Finnish version
and the English version, the Finnish version shall prevail.
The Securities Market Association is a cooperation body established in December 2006 by the Confederation of Finnish Industries
EK, the Central Chamber of Commerce of Finland and NASDAQ OMX Helsinki Ltd (hereinafter “Helsinki exchange”). The aim
of the association is to ensure, through more efficient self-regulation, that companies operating in the securities market observe
uniform and transparent operating principles and rules. The mission of the association is, among others, to promote good Corporate
Governance and to administer the Finnish Corporate Governance Code (hereinafter the “Code”).
Corporate Governance practices develop constantly. The Securities Market Association monitors domestic and international deve-
lopment and updates the Code when necessary. For additional information about the association, see www.cgfinland.fi.
In June 2009, the Board of the Securities Market Association appointed a working group to update the Code regarding recommen-
dations on remuneration of directors. The need to update the Code resulted from the changes that took place in the capital market in
connection with the financial crisis as well as the development of regulation on remuneration of directors, above all the Commission
recommendation on the remuneration of directors of listed companies issued on 30 April 2009. The working group was also given
the task to find out if the implementation of the directive on the exercise of certain rights of shareholders in the Finnish Limited
Liability Companies Act gave rise to amendments to the Code.
The secretariat of the working group consisted of Anne Horttanainen, Legal Counsel, Anna Santti, Legal Counsel, and Hannu
Ylänen, Advisor.
The working group convened 16 times and prepared proposals for amendments to the Code, in accordance with its assignment. The
group also heard authorities, experts and various market parties extensively. In addition, the working group publicly requested for
comments and received more than 20 comments.
The Board of the Securities Market Association has issued this Corporate Governance Code in June 2010. The Code will replace the
Corporate Governance Code issued in 2008.
In October 2008, the Board of the Securities Market Association issued a Corporate Governance Code, which replaced the Corpo-
rate Governance Recommendation for Listed Companies issued in 2003. The new Code took into account changes in regulation
and international development. The Code improved the opportunities of international investors to get information on the Finnish
Corporate Governance system as a whole and, above all, the rights of shareholders.
The Chairman of the working group that prepared the Code was Anne Leppälä-Nilsson, General Counsel, Legal Affairs.
The members of the working group were Ilona Ervasti-Vaintola, Group Chief Counsel, Group Executive Vice President, Jyrki
Kurkinen, Senior Vice President, Legal Affairs, Leena Linnainmaa, Director, Timo Löyttyniemi, Managing Director, Jaakko
Raulo, Assistant General Counsel, and Kaarina Ståhlberg, Assistant General Counsel. Tytti Peltonen, Chief Policy Advisor, was
permanent advisor to the working group.
The secretariat of the working group consisted of Anne Horttanainen, Legal Counsel, Anna Santti, Legal Counsel, Sanna Suni,
Legal Counsel, Ari Syrjäläinen, Legal Counsel, and Piia Vuoti, Advisor.
In December 2003, Hex Plc (at present NASDAQ OMX Helsinki Ltd), the Central Chamber of Commerce and the Confederation
of Finnish Industry and Employers (at present the Confederation of Finnish Industries EK) issued a Corporate Governance Recom-
mendation for Listed Companies. The recommendation greatly increased the openness of Finnish listed companies and included,
among others, a recommendation on the independence of directors.
The Chairman of the working group that prepared the recommendation was Pekka Merilampi, Lagman.
The members of the working group were Lars Blomqvist, B.Sc. (Econ.), APA, Ilona Ervasti-Vaintola, Chief Counsel, Executive
Vice President, Jyrki Kurkinen, Senior Vice President, Legal Affairs, Anne Leppälä-Nilsson, Vice President, Legal Affairs El-
mar Paananen, Executive Vice Chairman Ursula Ranin, Vice President, General Counsel, Jukka Ruuska, President, and Matti
Vuoria, Executive Chairman.
The secretaries of the working group were Jaakko Raulo, Director, Tiina Kairinen, Legal Counsel, and Leena Linnainmaa,
Deputy Director.
Corporate Governance Recommendation by the Central Chamber of Commerce and the Confederation of Finnish Industry
and Employers of 1997
The first Corporate Governance recommendation in Finland was issued in February 1997 by the Central Chamber of Commerce
and the Confederation of Finnish Industry and Employers (at present the Confederation of Finnish Industries EK). The aim was
to clarify the practices applied by Finnish companies and provide investors with better information on the Corporate Governance
practices applied by companies.
The Chairman of the working group that prepared the recommendation was Juhani Erma, Managing Director.
The members of the working group were Lars Blomqvist, B.Sc. (Econ.), APA, Ari Heiniö, Managing Director, Ahti Hirvonen,
PhD (Econ.) h.c., Olli-Pekka Kallasvuo, Director, Ilmo Korpelainen, Legal Counsel, Timo Lehto, Legal Counsel, Pekka Me-
rilampi, Attorney-at-law, Heikki Niskakangas, Professor, Markku Talonen, Managing Director, and Matti Vuoria, Secretary
General.
The secretaries of the working group were Marianna Uotinen-Tarkoma, Master of Laws, and Petri Vainio, Master of Laws.
1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 6
3. BOARD ................................................................................................................................................ 10
4. BOARD COMMITTEES........................................................................................................................ 13
Nomination committee...................................................................................................................................... 15
Recommendation 28 - Establishment of the nomination committee................................................................. 15
Recommendation 29 - Members of the nomination committee......................................................................... 15
Recommendation 30 - Duties of the nomination committee............................................................................. 16
Remuneration committee.................................................................................................................................. 16
Recommendation 31 - Establishment of the remuneration committee............................................................. 16
Recommendation 32 - Members of the remuneration committee..................................................................... 16
Recommendation 33 - Duties of the remuneration committee.......................................................................... 16
7. REMUNERATION................................................................................................................................. 18
Information on remuneration............................................................................................................................. 21
Recommendation 47 - Remuneration Statement.............................................................................................. 21
9. INSIDER ADMINISTRATION................................................................................................................ 23
11. COMMUNICATIONS........................................................................................................................... 25
The Code uses the terms “disclose”, “report” and “make avai- Shareholder’s rights
lable” to describe the dissemination of information to sharehol-
ders. Unless otherwise provided, the company shall present the The Finnish Limited Liability Companies Act contains provi-
information on the company website in all such cases. The term sions on share-related rights, e.g. exercising voting rights, the
disclosure to the public means the distribution of information in shareholder’s right to ask questions, the right of shareholders
the form of a stock exchange release. to put items on the agenda of a general meeting, as well as on
participation in a general meeting and the way of giving notice
of a general meeting.
Application of the Code The Act also contains the requirement on the equal treatment of
shareholders. All shares carry equal rights in a company, unless
The Code is aimed at companies listed on the Helsinki exchan- otherwise provided in the articles of association. The general
ge, provided that it is not in conflict with compelling regulations meeting, board of directors and managing director do not have
applicable in the domicile of the company. In the recommenda- the right to make a decision that could give undue benefit to a
tions, the term company is used for listed companies. shareholder or another person at the expense of the company or
another shareholder.
Governance model
Proxy document and proxy representative
As a rule, Finnish listed companies use a so-called one-tier
A shareholder may authorise a proxy representative to act on his governance model, which, in addition to the general meeting,
or her behalf at a general meeting. If the shares are nominee- comprises the board of directors and the managing director. Ac-
registered, the proxy representative may be, e.g. the custodian cording to the Limited Liability Companies Act, a company may
bank. The proxy representative shall produce a proxy document also have a supervisory board. Very few listed companies have
or otherwise provide reliable evidence of the right to represent supervisory boards.
the shareholder.
The general meeting shall be organised in a man- A person proposed for the first time as director
ner that permits shareholders to exercise their ow- shall participate in the general meeting that deci-
nership rights effectively. des on his or her election unless there are well-
founded reasons for the absence.
The board is responsible for the administration and the proper The board shall conduct an annual evaluation of
organisation of the operations of the company. The board super- its operations and working methods.
vises and controls the operative management of the company,
appoints and dismisses the managing director, approves the stra-
tegic goals and the principles of risk management for the compa- To ensure the efficiency of board work, the board shall evaluate
ny and ensures the proper operation of the management system. its operations and working methods regularly. This may be done
According to good corporate governance, the board also ensures as internal self-evaluation or by using an external evaluator.
that the company has duly endorsed the corporate values applied
to its operations.
In this Code, the operative management shall mean the mana- Recommendation 8 - Election of directors
ging director and the other executives, as defined in section 6.
The duty of the board is to promote the best interest of the com- The general meeting shall elect the directors.
pany and all its shareholders. A director does not represent the
interests of the parties who have proposed his or her election as
director. By electing the directors, the shareholders contribute to the ad-
ministration of the company, and thereby to the operations of the
The boards of Finnish listed companies mainly consist of non- entire company, directly and efficiently. The recommendation is
executive directors. A non-executive director is a person with no also applicable when the company has a supervisory board.
employment relationship or service contract with the company.
In some companies, the managing director is a member of the
board.
Recommendation 9 - Number, composition and
The recommendations regarding the board are also applied to competence of the directors
any deputy members.
The presentation of biographical details about the candidates on The majority of the directors shall be independent
the company website promotes the possibility of the sharehol- of the company. In addition, at least two of the di-
ders to take a stand on the election, especially with regard to rectors representing this majority shall be inde-
new director candidates. In this connection, the company may pendent of significant shareholders of the compa-
also present information on the independence of the candidates, ny.
if such information can be presented in an appropriate manner.
d) the director belongs to the operative manage- The above-mentioned criteria are divided into three categories.
ment of another company, and the two companies The existence of even one of the circumstances cited in sub-
have, or have had in the past year, a customer, sections a) to f) above means that the director cannot be regar-
supplier or cooperation relationship significant to ded as being independent of the company. Sub-sections g) to h)
the other company; present the criteria based on which a director is determined not
to be independent of a significant shareholder of the company.
e) the director belongs to the operative manage- Sub-sections i) to l) deal with issues based on which the board
ment of a company whose director is a member of may, after an overall evaluation, determine that the director is
the operative management of the first-mentioned not independent of the company or a significant shareholder.
company (interlocking control relationship); or
Even if a party was obliged to make a flagging announcement,
f) the director is, or has been in the past three such a party is not regarded as a significant shareholder referred
years, the auditor of the company, a partner or an to in sub-section h) above, if the significance criteria according
employee of the present auditor, or the director is to section h) are not fulfilled for its part.
a partner or an employee in an audit firm that has
been the company's auditor in the past three years. Companies belonging to the same group as the company are con-
sidered equal with the company. A company and another person
A director is not independent of a significant sha- are deemed related parties, if the person is able to exercise signi-
reholder, if ficant influence in the company's decision-making regarding its
finances and business operations.
g) the director exercises control in the company
or the director is a board member or has a rela-
tionship such as referred to in sub-sections a) to
b) above to a party who exercises control in the
company; or
The company shall report the following biographi- The proper function of the corporate governance of a company
cal details and information on the holdings of requires that board work be organised as efficiently as possible.
directors: The establishment of board committees may enhance the effi-
• name cient preparation of matters within the competence of the board.
• year of birth The directors on the committees can concentrate on the matters
• education delegated to the committee more extensively than the entire board.
• main occupation
• primary working experience The recommendations on board committees are applicable only
• date of commencement of board membership if the company establishes a committee. If a company establis-
• key positions of trust hes a committee and departs from an individual recommendati-
• shares and share-based rights of the director on on the committee, the company shall disclose and explain the
and corporations over which he or she exercises departure. However, a company shall establish an audit commit-
control in the company and in companies belon- tee, if the extent of the company’s business requires it (recom-
ging to the same group as the company. mendation 24). In addition, even companies that do not establish
an audit committee shall carry out the duties assigned for the
audit committee in recommendation 27.
Shareholders can, on the basis of information obtained about the
board members, evaluate the operating preconditions of the di-
rectors and their relationship with the company.
Recommendation 18 - Establishment of a
The key positions of trust mean a director’s present and former committee
key positions of trust.
The extent of the company’s business may require that some di-
The information on the number of committee meetings and at- rectors concentrate particularly on matters pertaining to financial
tendance of the members permits the shareholders to evaluate reporting and control. The audit committee has better possibili-
how active the committee has been and subsequently also the ties than the entire board to review questions pertaining to com-
efficiency of board work. The attendance of the members at pany finances and control and take care of the contacts with the
committee meetings may be reported as attendance of individual auditors and the internal audit function.
members or as the average attendance of the members.
The board shall define the duties of the nomination The majority of the members of the remuneration
committee in the charter of the committee. committee shall be independent of the company.
The managing director or other executives of the
company may not be appointed to the remunerati-
The duties of the nomination committee shall be defined in the on committee.
charter confirmed for the committee and they shall reflect the
requirements of the company. The duties of the nomination com-
mittee may include, e.g.: Due to the nature of the matters that the remuneration committee
• the preparation of the proposal for the appointment of direc- deals with, neither the managing director nor executive directors
tors to be presented to the general meeting may be members of the committee.
• the preparation of the proposal to the general meeting on
matters pertaining to the remuneration of directors
• looking for prospective successors for the directors
• presentation of the proposal on the directors to the general Recommendation 33 - Duties of the remunerati-
meeting. on committee
The duties of the nomination committee shall be disclosed in The duties of the remuneration committee shall be defined in the
accordance with recommendation 20. charter confirmed for the committee, and they shall reflect the
requirements of the company. The duties of the remuneration
committee may include, e.g.:
• preparation of matters pertaining to the appointment of the
Remuneration committee managing director and the other executives as well as the
identification of their possible successors
Recommendation 31 - Establishment of the re- • preparation of matters pertaining to the remuneration and
muneration committee other financial benefits of the managing director and other
executives
• preparation of matters pertaining to the remuneration
The board may establish a remuneration commit- schemes of the company
tee to improve the efficient preparation of matters • evaluation of the remuneration of the managing director and
pertaining to the appointment and remuneration of the other executives as well as seeing to it that the remunera-
the managing director and other executives of the tion schemes are appropriate
company as well as the remuneration schemes of • answering questions related to the remuneration statement
the personnel. at the general meeting.
The managing director is a corporate body that is in charge of the The managing director shall not be elected chair-
day-to-day management of the company in accordance with the man of the board.
instructions and orders issued by the board. The board appoints
and discharges the managing director and supervises his or her
operations. The election of the managing director as chairman of the board
has been restricted, as it is the duty of the board to supervise the
The managing director may undertake acts which, considering managing director.
the scope and nature of the operations of the company, are unu-
sual or extensive, only with the authorisation of the board. The The company should clearly divide the areas of responsibility
managing director is responsible for ensuring that the company of the managing director and the chairman of the board to en-
accounting practices comply with the law and that the financial sure that all the decision-making powers of the company are, in
matters are handled in a reliable manner. practice, not vested in a single individual. Generally, this means
that the managing director cannot be elected board chairman.
The recommendations of the Code shall be applied to the deputy However, some special circumstances, such as the business area
managing director, when he or she actually takes care of the du- of the company, the extent or development phase of the opera-
ties of the managing director. tions or the ownership structure may justify the combination of
these two roles.
The operative management of the company is based on the ma- Properly-functioning and competitive remuneration is an es-
nagement organisation adopted for the company. The manage- sential tool for recruiting the best possible management for the
ment organisation is an important element of the company’s company. This in turn contributes to the financial success of the
corporate governance system. The organisation often comprises company and the implementation of good corporate governance.
a management team, which assists the managing director in the Another aim of remuneration is to increase the commitment of
performance of his or her duties. The management team has no the board, the managing director and other executives to pro-
official statutory position but, in practice, it has a significant role mote the interests of the company and its shareholders. The re-
in the organisation of the company management. muneration policy adopted supports the implementation of the
goals set by the company and company strategy as well as its
The term other executives refers to the members of the company long-term results.
management team or, if the company has no management team,
to the executives specified by the company. The transparency of remuneration policy and its principles al-
lows the shareholders to evaluate the appropriateness of the
company’s remuneration policy and its effectiveness in achie-
ving the goals. Open access to information also facilitates the
Recommendation 37 - Management organisation comparison of remuneration practices.
The general meeting shall decide on the remunera- The payments by all companies belonging to the same group as
tion payable for board and committee work as well the company are included in the remuneration and other finan-
as the basis for its determination. The board of cial benefits.
directors shall decide on the remuneration of the
managing director as well as other compensation The information on the remuneration and benefits of the di-
payable to him or her. The company shall disclose rectors permits the shareholders to evaluate the amount of re-
the decision-making process for the remunerati- muneration in relation to the contribution of the board to the
on of the company’s managing director and other achievement of the company goals. Open communication also
executives. facilitates comparison with the remuneration and other benefits
paid by different companies.
The company may require that a director retain the shares or part
of the shares received as remuneration as long as he or she is a
director.
Recommendation 45 - Principles for the remune- The company may require that the managing director retain the
ration schemes of the managing director and ot- shares or part of the shares received as remuneration during the
her executives term of the service contract.
The disclosure shall include The termination payment and other possible compensation pa-
• the division of the remuneration into non-variable yable due to the termination of the managing director’s service
and variable components, and contract may not, in general, exceed an aggregate amount cor-
• main information on responding to the non-variable salary for two years.
• the determination of the variable components
of the remuneration,
• share and share-based remuneration sche-
mes, and
• additional pensions, if any.
The auditor has an important role as a controlling body ap- The company shall report the fees of the auditor
pointed by the shareholders. The audits give shareholders an in- for the financial period. If the auditor has received
dependent opinion on how the financial statements and report by fees for non-audit services, such fees shall be re-
the board of directors of the company have been drawn up and ported separately.
the accounting and administration of the company have been
managed. Placing the audit under competition may increase the The information on the fees of the auditor permits the sharehol-
efficiency and independence of the audit. ders to evaluate the operations of the auditor. Since the auditor
controls the company on behalf of the shareholders, the share-
holders must also be given information on fees paid to the audi-
tor for non-audit services.
Recommendation 52 - Information on auditor
candidates Companies belonging to the same group or chain as the audit
firm as well as companies controlled by the auditor are conside-
red equal with the auditor.
The proposal for the auditor by the audit commit-
tee or board shall be included in the notice of the The fees paid by all companies belonging to the same group as
general meeting. The same applies to a proposal the company are reported as fees.
made by shareholders with at least 10 % of the vo-
tes carried by the company shares, provided that
the candidate has given his or her consent to the
election and the company has received informa-
tion on the proposal sufficiently in advance so
that it may be included in the notice of the general
meeting. If the board is not aware of a prospective
auditor when the notice is published, a candidate
proposed in corresponding order shall be disclo-
sed to the public separately.
When electing the auditor, it must be taken into account that the
aggregate duration of the consecutive terms of an auditor may
not exceed seven years. The seven-year rule applies only to the
auditor with main responsibility, not to an audit firm.
By presenting the Corporate Governance Statement as a sepa- The company shall keep the statement on its website at least five
rate report, the company may emphasise the information given years.
to shareholders and other investors. The information can also
easily be found in a separate report.