Difference Between Bluetooth and Wifi

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Difference between Bluetooth and wifi

Bluetooth® and WiFi® are both wireless technologies that use radio frequency (RF) waves to create networks, but they’re
used for fundamentally different purposes. Bluetooth®’s main purpose is to temporarily link an individual’s personal
devices together over short distances, while WiFi’s purpose is to link multiple computers together over longer distances.

Although Bluetooth® and WiFi both create networks, Bluetooth® creates a Personal Area Network (PAN) by generating
low frequency radio waves that all Bluetooth®-enabled devices in the immediate area can join to be interoperable. You
might think of this as a “shroud” surrounding an individual user. A Bluetooth® headset, for example, allows hands-free
cell phone use for driving or working. Other types of personal devices can swap files, synchronize data and even share
access to the Internet through an Internet-enabled laptop, cell phone, personal digital assistant (PDA) or iPod®.

Ads by Google
Outdoor Mesh Technology
Quality of Service (QoS) Enabling Voice, Video and E-class Security
www.proxim.com
Outdoor WiFi Beam Forming
GoNet Systems WiFi smart anttenna BST Combined with Dual radio Mesh
www.gonetworks.com

A Bluetooth® network can also be used to send files from your laptop to your desktop, or from your laptop to your printer.
If a machine does not come with Bluetooth® capability built-in, adapters are available. Most adapters make use of a
Universal Serial Bus (USB) port, but other types of adapters are also available.

WiFi also uses radio frequency (RF) waves, but its protocols are designed to connect multiple computers. In the case of a
business, WiFi allows many computers to communicate with each other without stringing cable between them, saving
considerable money and time in the installation process. Computers operating over the WiFi LAN can share databases,
files, programs and resources including printers, scanners and fax machines. The computers might also share Internet
access, though this isn’t a requirement of a LAN.

A home WiFi network is almost always setup to share Internet access among all computers in the household, while it may
or may not be configured to share files and resources. Between Bluetooth® and WiFi, Bluetooth® is much easier to use
for swapping files between computers at home, and even for sending files to a nearby printer. There is virtually no setup
involved in establishing a Bluetooth® network, while a LAN requires some configuration and know-how to allow sharing
of files and resources.

Since Bluetooth® works with battery operated devices, it most commonly uses a low-powered Class 2 radio to broadcast
the RF network, generating a weak signal that doesn’t extend effectively beyond 30 feet (~10 meters) or so. Class 1
Bluetooth® can reach 10x further, geared towards connecting home devices powered by electricity. WiFi also comes in
different flavors and architectures, currently meeting or exceeding the 300-foot (~100m) range.

Bluetooth® and WiFi each follow specific protocols and standards that make it easy for manufacturers to design and
market Bluetooth® and WiFi products that will be interoperable with other brands and products that support the same
standards. For example, as of winter 2008 the current Bluetooth® standard is 2.0 and the newest available WiFi standard is
802.11n, faster than the previous standard, 802.11g. When shopping for network-capable devices, be sure they support the
desired standard and version.

Another way that Bluetooth® and WiFi differ is that WiFi is supported by modems and routers, while a near-infinite range
of products might support Bluetooth®. Personal devices and home entertainment products are forever evolving, making
interoperability a highly desired feature. Perhaps the biggest commonality between Bluetooth® and WiFi is that both
technologies are incredibly useful and widespread; in homes, businesses, government, and in virtually every aspect of life.
Difference between Bluetooth and zigbee

Bluetooth and ZigBee have much in common. Both are types of IEEE 802.15 "wireless personal-
area networks," or WPANs. Both run in the 2.4-GHz unlicensed frequency band, and both use
small form factors and low power.

At the Wireless Communications Alliance's February meeting in Silicon Valley, Bhupender


Virk, president and CEO of WPAN components maker CompXs, sorted out the application and
technical differences between Bluetooth (IEEE 802.15.1) and the ZigBee specification (based on
IEEE 802.15.4), which was ratified in December.

Mobility Management for Dummies: Download now

ZigBee protocols define a type of sensor network for residential and commercial applications
such as heating, air conditioning and lighting control. It combines IEEE 802.15.4, which defines
the physical and MAC protocol layers, with network, security and application software layers as
specified by the ZigBee Alliance, a consortium of technology companies.

Imagine the freedom if light switches were to become wireless, eliminating the electrical cabling
through your walls, for example.

Related Content

 Sensor networks: Who's in charge?BLOG


 ZigBee spec on deckBLOG
 Mitsubishi preps ZigBee for enterprise security apps
 Discover the Security Capabilities in a Modern Wi-Fi SolutionWHITE PAPER
 ZigBee group OKs spec for wireless sensor nets

View more related content


Get Daily News by Email

Bluetooth, as you likely know, eliminates cabling between electronic products and accessories,
such as between computers and printers or between phones and headsets. Bluetooth users with
handhelds or laptops can exchange files, business cards and calendar appointments. Bluetooth is
more oriented toward user mobility and eliminating short-distance cabling; ZigBee aims more
for grand-scale automation and remote control.

The first ZigBee products are now in interoperability testing through April, says Virk, who
expects alliance-certified products to be available in the third quarter (when he says CompXs
will ship a ZigBee protocol analyzer). Industry reports imply that, eventually, ZigBee might be
built into mobile phones via dual-function ZigBee-Bluetooth chips for remote control of nearly
anything you can think of and for buying items from vending machines.

Finally, for the geeks among us, Virk pointed out some technical differences between the two
protocols:
* Modulation technique
Bluetooth: Frequency Hopping Spread Spectrum (FHSS)
ZigBee: Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum (DSSS)

* Protocol stack size


Bluetooth: 250K bytes
ZigBee: 28K bytes

* Battery
Bluetooth: Intended for frequent recharging
ZigBee: Not rechargeable (one reason batteries will last for up to 10 years)

* Maximum network speed:


Bluetooth: 1M bit/sec
ZigBee:  250K bit/sec

* Network range:
Bluetooth: 1 or 100 meters, depending on radio class
ZigBee: Up to 70 meters

* Typical network join time


Bluetooth: 3 seconds
ZigBee: 30 milliseconds

Read more about wireless & mobile in Network World's Wireless & Mobile section.

You might also like