Saab Ja-37 Viggen Performance Assessment: John Mciver B.Eng. (Aero) Temporal Images
Saab Ja-37 Viggen Performance Assessment: John Mciver B.Eng. (Aero) Temporal Images
Saab Ja-37 Viggen Performance Assessment: John Mciver B.Eng. (Aero) Temporal Images
Performance Assessment
Prepared by
Temporal Images
1. Overview
The SAAB JA-37 Viggen is a Swedish single seat multi-role fighter. The aircraft is a delta wing design with a canard. Viggen
is Swedish for "Thunderbolt". The aircraft has been built in several versions, as follows;
The first flight of the AJ-37 (attack) version was on the 2nd of February, 1967. For the JA-37 (air defence) version, the
prototype first flew in June 1974, followed by the first production prototype on the 15th of December 1975, and the first
production JA-37 on the 4th of November 1977.
This document is intended to record all the known, freely available weight and dimensional data about the Viggen, then use
this information to produce a performance estimate for the aircraft.
2. Dimensions
The following figures represent the best data available for the leading dimensions of the aircraft. Note that most dimensions
and weights are provided in metric units, then converted to imperial units.
www.temporal.com.au Page 1
Total Lifting Area 52.20 square metres 561.88 sq.ft (including foreplanes)
Gross Wing Area 46.00 square metres 495.16 sq.ft (wing alone)
Foreplane Area 6.20 square metres 66.74 sq.ft (nett)
Note: the gross wing area is the area of the main wing, including that portion which carries across the fuselage. The foreplane
area is the area of the lifting surfaces, not including the portion which carries through the fuselage. The "total wing area"
defined in some areas is the sum of the gross wing area and nett foreplane area, and can be misleading.
3. Weights
Only limited weight data (in metric units) has been provided for the aircraft. The following is my best estimate for the actual
weights of the aircraft and its component parts.
The cannon has 150 rounds, at 0.36 kg (0.79 lbs) per round for a total weight of 54 kg.
www.temporal.com.au Page 2
Weight Breakdown
Assuming the figure of 12,200 kg for a clean, empty aircraft is approximately correct, we can now check one of the other
weights to see if it corresponds. An empty aircraft is the condition of the aircraft being fully equipped but with no fuel,
pilot or external stores. We have a value for a normal loaded aircraft, which gives us a weight of 17,000 kg when fitted with
4 air-to-air missiles. If we add weights for a pilot and full internal fuel, plus four Rb-24 missiles (AIM-9L), we get the
following;
This corresponds approximately to the weight expected. So we can now propose a weight breakdown for the aircraft and its
component parts.
www.temporal.com.au Page 3
4. Ordnance
The aircraft is typically configured to have up to seven (7) external pylons. These are located as follows (with estimated
load limits at each location);
A typical air defence loading would include 2 x Rb 72 Skyflash and 2 or 4 x Rb 24 Sidewinder (AIM-9L) missiles. The aircraft
is fitted with a single 30 mm Oerlikon KCA cannon. This has 150 rounds available.
5. Engine
The aircraft is fitted with a Volvo Flygmotor RM-8 turbofan engine. This is based on the Pratt & Whitney JT-8D-22 engine, with
a Volvo designed afterburner fitted. The engine has two versions. The RM-8A is fitted to all except the JA version of the
aircraft. The JA is fitted with the RM-8B engine; a slightly more powerful version of the engine.
Thrust
Fuel Consumption
www.temporal.com.au Page 4
Dimensions
For comparison purposes the key performance data for the JT-8 engine are provided here. This is a non-afterburning engine.
6. Performance
The following performance and mission profile data is the best estimate from the various sources of data found.
Max Speed at Seal Level (4 x AAM) 838 mph 1350 kmh Mach 1.10
Max Speed at 11,000 metres 1365 mph 2195 kmh Mach 2.1 (at 36,090 ft)
Approach Speed 119 knots 137 mph 220 kmh
www.temporal.com.au Page 5
Mission Profiles
Tactical Radius
For external load of 4 x 1000 lbs (454 kg) bombs and fuel
Tactical Radius
7. Take-Off
The aircraft was initially designed to operate from narrow 500 m long runways (1640 feet). Tha actual take-off run is
approximately 400 metres (1310 feet). The key points in the aircraft take-off are as follows;
After lift-off the undercarriage is retracted and the aircraft accelerates at a 2 to 3 degree climb angle
to 367 knots (680 kmh).
Below 190 knots (350 kmh) the aircraft is very sensitive in roll.
Afterburner is cut out at 270 knots (500 kmh) due primarily to noise abatement requirements.
Over 30 degrees AOA the aircraft will enter into a "super stall", but is easily recoverable.
www.temporal.com.au Page 6
8. Landing
Landing Run approx 500 m
Landing Speed 220 kmh
The aircraft crosses the runway threshold at 130 knots (240 kmh).
www.temporal.com.au Page 7
9. References
Jane's All the World's Aircraft 1985-86
Attack Aircraft
by Roy Braybrook
Haynes Publishing Group 1990
www.temporal.com.au Page 8
10. Conversion Factors
The following conversion factors between metric and Imperial units were used at various places in this document.
www.temporal.com.au Page 9
Appendix A: Calculated Aircraft Dimensions
The following dimensions and areas have been determined by scanning a 3-view drawing of the Viggen, then importing it into a
CAD program, scaling it appropriately and measuring the specific values shown here. Many of these values will be required for
a theoretical drag estimation of the aircraft and other aspects of the performance assessment.
No specific wing section data has been found so the values shown are estimates only, based on standard design assumptions.
Wing
Root Chord 24.9 feet Tip Chord 1.8 feet Taper Ratio 0.07
Foreplane
Root Chord 1.0 feet Tip Chord 2.2 feet Taper Ratio 0.20
Vertical Fin
Root Chord 13.6 feet Tip Chord 1.6 feet Taper Ratio 0.12
www.temporal.com.au Page 10
Fuselage
www.temporal.com.au Page 11
Appendix B: Calculated Aerodynamic Data
Calculation of Maximum Lift Coefficient
It is possible to make an estimate of the maximum lift coefficient for the aircraft. Available data states the aircraft
approach speed is 119 knots, which will be a speed just above the stall speed of the aircraft.
Assuming 119 knots is the aircraft stall speed, we know the wing area and air density, and can approximate the aircraft weight,
and so find the lift coefficient for this condition.
We will assume the atmospheric conditions are for sea level and standard ISA conditions. This gives an air mass density of
0.002378 slugs per cubic foot. Also, 119 knots is equal to 201 feet per second.
We have a gross wing area of 562 square feet. Because the aircraft is of canard configuration, the foreplanes generate lift
as well as the main wing, so both contribute to the total aircraft lift.
We will assume a standard weight condition for the aircraft for all subsequent analysis. Much of the tactical radius data
obtained is for an aircraft in an air defence configuration, carrying 4 air to air missiles. We will assume this is for two
short range ((AIM-9L) and two long range (SkyFlash) missiles. It is also normal practice to assume a 50% fuel load for
performance analysis such as this, so we will assume a 50% internal fuel load and no external fuel.
In practice the actual lift coefficient will be probably be somewhere between 1.25 and 1.30 but a value of 1.23 (based on a
reference wing area of 562 square feet) is a safe value for controlled flight at a minimum speed.
www.temporal.com.au Page 12
Appendix C: Performance Analysis
Based on the data presented here, a performance estimate for the Viggen has been prepared. This was generated using the suite
of computer programs produced by Mr Sidney A Powers, called "BASIC Aircraft Performance" (Kern International, Inc. Copyright
1984).
This suit of programs includes routines to predict aircraft drag, format engine data and determine various aircraft
performance parameters, including mission analysis and flight performance at varying altitudes.
DRAG ESTIMATE
These routines were used to iteratively obtain a likely drag for the Viggen aircraft, then to determine other data, including
flight envelopes at various load factors, turning performance and mission performance for varying stores configurations.
In obtaining a drag estimate for the aircraft it is always necessary to define this in relation to the aircraft's engine
performance. The engine performance (thrust and fuel flow, and their variation with speed and altitude) was estimated based
on the best data available, but cannot be guaranteed to truly represent the Viggen engine. So the drag data presented is that
which corresponds to the engine data used here. If another engine computer model is used to generate engine performance then
the drag values may need to be adjusted to suit.
Drag is presented in the typical way for computer analysis, as a profile drag coefficient and a wing spanwise efficiency
factor. Together these will define the drag polar for the aircraft. These values have been provided at a range of aircraft
speeds, to allow for the relative effects of subsonic, transonic and supersonic flow. That is,
CD = CDo + CDi
Initially a set of drag coefficients was obtained using one of the routines provided in the "BASIC Aircraft Performance" suite.
Prior use of this program had indicated it provided only a very approximately correct value, and then only at lower speeds.
Using this as a starting point these drag data were revised using an iterative procedure. The drag values would be used to
generate a flight envelope, then this envelope would be compared with the quoted aircraft performance (stall speed, maximum
speed at low level, maximum speed at altitude and service ceiling). The drag data would then be adjusted as required to better
match the known performance of the aircraft.
www.temporal.com.au Page 13
Table 1 shows the geometric data input into the analysis program, and used to obtain the initial drag estimate for the
aircraft. Table 2 shows the final drag data obtained after interation, and used for the final performance assessments. Table
3 shows the typical output for one velocity for the "BASIC Aircraft Performance" drag prediction routine, while Table 4 shows
the engine data which was used for this analysis.
Figure 1 shows the estimated variation of the aircraft profile drag coefficient with speed, while Figure 2 shows the
corresponding wing spanwise efficiency factor and its variation with speed.
BASIC DATA========================================
ZERO FUEL WEIGHT = 27120
FUEL WEIGHT = 9790
NUMBER OF ENGINES = 1
THRUST MULTIPLIER = 1
FUEL FLOW MULTIPLIER = 1
CL(MAX) = 1.25
WING==============================================
THEORETICAL AREA = 495.16
ASPECT RATIO = 2.45
TAPER RATIO = 0.07
SWEEP OF X/C = 42.0
X/C = 0.25
(T/C)MAX = 0.04
X/C LOC OF (T/C)MAX = 0.4
AIRFOIL RN/C = 1.76304E-03
HORIZONTAL TAIL===FLAPPED=========================
EXPOSED AREA = 70.0
EXPOSED ASPECT RATIO = 0.8
EXPOSED TAPER RATIO = 0.2
SWEEP OF X/C = 50.0
X/C = 0.25
(T/C)MAX = 0.06
X/C LOC OF (T/C)MAX = 0.4
VERTICAL TAIL===SINGLE/FLAPPED====================
SINGLE FIN AREA = 68.7
GEOMETRIC ASPECT RATIO = 1.20
EXPOSED TAPER RATIO = 0.12
SWEEP OF X/C = 43.0
www.temporal.com.au Page 14
X/C = 0.25
(T/C)MAX = 0.05
X/C LOC OF (T/C)MAX = 0.4
FUSELAGE==========================================
WETTED AREA = 880
LENGTH = 50.0
WIDTH = 8.25
HEIGHT = 7.0
MISCELLANEOUS=====================================
DELTA CD0 = 0.02
DELTA F = 0.0
MISC FACTOR = 0.25
www.temporal.com.au Page 15
******** REVIEW WING E TABLE *********
RN/FT = 4.26E+06
REFERENCE WING AREA = 495.2
FORM INTERF
COMPONENT SWET LENGTH RN FACTOR CF FACTOR CDW CD0 F
--------- ------- ------ -------- ----- ------- ------ ------- ------- -----
WING 609.2 13.91 5.93E+07 1.048 0.00217 1.143 0.00000 0.00319 1.580
HORIZONTAL 143.2 10.74 4.58E+07 1.073 0.00225 1.351 0.00000 0.00094 0.467
VERTICAL 140.0 9.12 3.89E+07 1.060 0.00231 1.340 0.00000 0.00093 0.459
FUSELAGE 880.0 50.00 2.13E+08 1.227 0.00181 1.015 0.00000 0.00400 1.980
MISC. 0.0 0.00 0.00E+00 0.000 0.00000 0.000 0.00000 0.00866 4.290
------ ------- -----
TOTAL 1,772.3 0.01772 8.776
CFE = 0.00495
www.temporal.com.au Page 16
Table 4 FILE :FN)RM8B
IDENTIFIER :VOLVO FLYGMOTOR RM-8B TURBOFAN
NO OF ALTITUDES : 7
ALTITUDE : 0 FEET
MACH THRUST FUEL FLOW
---- ------ ---------
0.000 22,650 57,078
14,164 9,065
8,758 5,342
www.temporal.com.au Page 17
0.800 23,740 59,825
9,120 5,837
5,120 3,123
www.temporal.com.au Page 18
1.800 41,742 %105,190
0 0
www.temporal.com.au Page 19
1.000 8,953 22,561
3,097 1,982
1,578 963
www.temporal.com.au Page 20
0 0
PERFORMANCE ESTIMATE
Once a specific set of drag and thrust data has been defined, for a particular aircraft geometric configuration, it is possible
to determine the aircraft's performance. The most useful initial performance data is the aircraft flight envelope. For the
Viggen. this has been estimated for a number of load factors. Table 5 shows the flight envelope data generated by the
performance analysis program, while Figure 3 presents the flight envelope in a graphical form. The flight envelope
approximates to the published performance values for the aircraft in terms of maximum speeds, stall speed and expected service
ceiling.
www.temporal.com.au Page 21
LOAD FACTOR = 1
<-----MINIMUM-----> <-----MAXIMUM----->
ALTITUDE M KTAS KEAS M KTAS KEAS
-------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
0 0.187 124 124 1.136 752 752
5,000 0.205 133 124 1.123 730 678
10,000 0.225 144 124 1.091 696 599
15,000 0.249 156 124 1.173 735 583
20,000 0.275 169 124 1.485 912 667
25,000 0.306 184 124 1.635 984 660
30,000 0.342 202 124 1.762 %1039 637
35,000 0.396 228 127 1.919 %1106 618
40,000 0.494 283 141 2.099 %1204 599
45,000 0.599 344 152 1.981 %1136 502
50,000 0.729 418 164 1.018 584 229
51,000 0.753 432 165 0.997 572 219
52,000 0.778 446 167 0.983 564 211
53,000 0.807 463 169 0.969 556 203
54,000 0.844 484 172 0.951 545 194
55,000 0.888 509 177 0.915 525 183
LOAD FACTOR = 2
<-----MINIMUM-----> <-----MAXIMUM----->
ALTITUDE M KTAS KEAS M KTAS KEAS
-------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
0 0.264 175 175 1.131 748 748
5,000 0.290 188 175 1.113 724 672
10,000 0.318 203 175 1.068 682 586
15,000 0.351 220 175 1.123 703 558
20,000 0.397 244 178 1.311 805 589
25,000 0.484 291 195 1.504 906 607
30,000 0.584 344 211 1.594 939 576
35,000 0.726 419 234 1.003 578 323
40,000 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0
www.temporal.com.au Page 22
LOAD FACTOR = 3
<-----MINIMUM-----> <-----MAXIMUM----->
ALTITUDE M KTAS KEAS M KTAS KEAS
-------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
0 0.324 214 214 1.123 743 743
5,000 0.356 232 215 1.058 688 639
10,000 0.415 265 228 1.036 661 568
15,000 0.492 309 245 1.049 657 522
20,000 0.588 361 264 1.051 646 472
25,000 0.700 422 283 1.006 606 406
30,000 0.845 498 305 0.952 561 344
35,000 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0
LOAD FACTOR = 4
<-----MINIMUM-----> <-----MAXIMUM----->
ALTITUDE M KTAS KEAS M KTAS KEAS
-------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
0 0.413 273 273 0.989 654 654
5,000 0.476 309 287 1.000 650 603
10,000 0.554 354 304 1.000 638 549
15,000 0.653 409 325 0.990 620 492
20,000 0.765 470 343 0.968 594 434
25,000 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0
LOAD FACTOR = 5
<-----MINIMUM-----> <-----MAXIMUM----->
ALTITUDE M KTAS KEAS M KTAS KEAS
-------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
0 0.517 342 342 0.000 0 0
5,000 0.598 389 361 0.976 635 589
10,000 0.692 442 380 0.968 618 531
15,000 0.810 507 403 0.939 589 467
20,000 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0
www.temporal.com.au Page 23
LOAD FACTOR = 6
<-----MINIMUM-----> <-----MAXIMUM----->
ALTITUDE M KTAS KEAS M KTAS KEAS
-------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
0 0.626 414 414 0.000 0 0
5,000 0.721 469 435 0.949 617 573
10,000 0.846 540 464 0.917 586 503
15,000 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0
LOAD FACTOR = 7
<-----MINIMUM-----> <-----MAXIMUM----->
ALTITUDE M KTAS KEAS M KTAS KEAS
-------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
0 0.744 492 492 0.933 617 617
5,000 0.898 584 542 0.902 586 545
10,000 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0
In an attempt to verify the performance data estimated here with the published performance figures a ferry mission was defined.
Table 6 shows the specific legs making up this ferry mission, while Figure 4 displays the results obtained from the analysis
program. The published figures indicate a ferry range for the aircraft of 1250 miles (2000 kilometres). The computer
prediction gives calculated a ferry range of 1088 miles (945 nautical miles).
SEG DESCRIPTION
--- -----------
1 ALLOW FUEL FOR 1 MIN AT FULL THROTTLE
5 MIN AT IDLE THRUST
2 ACCELERATE TO CLIMB SPEED
3 CLIMB TO 35000 FEET AT MAX R/C
**** RANGE BALANCE FOLLWING SEGMENT
4 CRUISE FOR 1200 NM AT BEST NM/LB
5 DESCEND TO 0 FEET WITH NO CREDIT
6 ALLOW FUEL FOR 1 MIN AT FULL THROTTLE
5 MIN AT IDLE THRUST
www.temporal.com.au Page 24
Further checking of the drag data estimated here was carried out by comparing a climb to altitude. This information was
provided in the published data for the aircraft, with a climb to 32,810 feet (10,000 metres) quoted as taking 1.4 minutes (84
seconds), for an aircraft loaded with four AAM stores plus 50% internal fuel, and climb performed at maximum afterburner. The
analysis program indicated a time to 32,000 feet, for the same aircraft configuration, would take 1.7 minutes (102 seconds).
The program output for this climb is presented in Table 7, with Figure 5 showing the actual, and estimated, time to climb in
a graphical format.
FUEL
TIME ALT RANGE WEIGHT FUEL TAS EAS R/C SR FLOW
MIN FT NM LBS LBS KTS KTS MACH FT/MIN NM/LB CL CD0 LB/HR THRUST E L/D
----- ------ ------ ------- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ----- ------ ----- -----
0.0 0 0 36,910 9,790 0.0 0.0 0.000 0 0.0000 0.000 0.00000 0 0 0.000 0.0
CLIMB TO 32810 FEET AT BEST R/C
0.0 0 0 36,910 9,790 555.4 555.4 0.840 29,327 0.0074 0.071 0.01921 74,654 29,625 0.764 3.6
0.1 2,000 1 36,826 9,706 551.3 535.4 0.839 28,660 0.0076 0.077 0.01919 72,181 28,604 0.764 3.8
0.1 4,000 1 36,742 9,622 551.0 519.3 0.845 27,906 0.0079 0.081 0.01940 69,826 27,654 0.764 4.0
0.2 6,000 2 36,659 9,539 551.5 504.4 0.851 27,077 0.0082 0.086 0.01966 67,391 26,691 0.764 4.1
0.3 8,000 3 36,576 9,456 552.5 490.0 0.859 26,182 0.0085 0.091 0.01995 64,872 25,711 0.764 4.3
0.4 10,000 3 36,493 9,373 553.7 476.1 0.867 25,231 0.0089 0.096 0.02026 62,284 24,716 0.764 4.4
0.4 12,000 4 36,411 9,291 555.5 462.8 0.877 24,146 0.0093 0.101 0.02062 59,696 23,660 0.764 4.5
0.5 14,000 5 36,329 9,209 541.5 436.9 0.861 22,869 0.0096 0.114 0.02002 56,196 22,260 0.764 5.1
0.6 16,000 6 36,247 9,127 537.1 419.5 0.861 21,663 0.0101 0.123 0.02001 53,257 21,097 0.764 5.4
0.7 18,000 7 36,165 9,045 536.8 405.7 0.867 20,524 0.0106 0.131 0.02025 50,574 20,046 0.764 5.7
0.8 20,000 7 36,082 8,962 538.1 393.3 0.876 19,419 0.0112 0.139 0.02058 48,005 19,050 0.764 5.8
0.9 22,000 8 35,999 8,879 538.6 380.5 0.884 18,105 0.0119 0.148 0.02088 45,221 17,927 0.764 6.0
1.0 24,000 9 35,916 8,796 528.6 360.8 0.875 16,615 0.0126 0.165 0.02053 41,977 16,633 0.764 6.5
1.2 26,000 11 35,831 8,711 525.0 345.9 0.876 15,295 0.0134 0.179 0.02058 39,178 15,524 0.764 6.9
1.3 28,000 12 35,745 8,625 525.8 334.2 0.884 14,120 0.0143 0.191 0.02091 36,717 14,556 0.764 7.0
1.4 30,000 13 35,657 8,537 524.8 321.7 0.891 12,945 0.0153 0.205 0.02114 34,271 13,599 0.764 7.3
1.6 32,000 14 35,566 8,446 514.4 303.9 0.881 11,104 0.0168 0.230 0.02076 30,600 12,185 0.764 7.7
1.7 32,810 15 35,529 8,409 513.0 298.5 0.881 10,462 0.0175 0.238 0.02079 29,332 11,697 0.764 7.8
1381<---- DELTA FUEL
www.temporal.com.au Page 25
As there was a discrepancy with the actual and calculated ferry ranges (1250 miles compared with 1088 miles), a little further
investigation was carried out. The actual ferry range was at an unspecified cruising altitude, so the ferry mission was run
for a range of different cuise altitudes. The results of this analysis are shown in Figure 6. This indicated a maximum
achievable range of about 960 nautical miles (1105 miles), which is about 13% less than the published figure for tha actual
aircraft.
Overall, the discrepancies in the ferry range and climb performance are most likely due to the use of less than perfect engine
performance data. Better engine data would probably give a closer match to the actual aircraft performance. At present, the
engine and drag data currently used in the computer analysis program will give conservative performance results.
Finally, a table of data has been provided to define the predicted manoeuvre performance of the aircraft. This data is for a
range of velocities and altitudes, and is presented in Table 8. Estimates are given for maximum turnrate, specific excess
power, specific range and a few other parameters.
ALTITUDE = 0
<-------------- N = 1 ------------->
<-------------MAX POWER-------------> <-------CRUISE POWER------->
T RATE TR/FF P-SUB-S S RNG F FLOW THRUST
MACH CL-M N-MAX DEG/S DEG/LG FT/SEC NM/LB LB/HR LB/ENG CL-C
---- ---- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ------ -----
0.20 1.250 1.15 4.6 0.3 119.1 0.0347 3,813 6,460 1.091*
0.30 1.250 2.58 13.1 0.8 211.0 0.0980 2,025 3,809 0.485*
0.40 1.058 3.88 15.5 0.9 290.9 0.1402 1,887 3,562 0.273
0.50 0.845 4.84 15.6 0.9 371.8 0.1409 2,347 4,196 0.175
0.60 0.699 5.77 15.6 0.8 445.5 0.1261 3,148 5,334 0.121
0.70 0.591 6.64 15.5 0.8 509.8 0.1103 4,198 6,847 0.089
0.80 0.507 7.44 15.2 0.8 562.3 0.0969 5,461 8,681 0.068
0.90 0.423 7.84 14.3 0.7 557.4 0.0412 14,438 13,067 0.054
1.00 0.125 2.85 4.4 0.2 65.1 0.0088 75,413 30,555 0.044
1.10 0.173 4.80 7.1 0.2 212.9 0.0074 98,916 40,191 0.036
1.20 0.000 1.00 0.0 0.0 -417.4 0.0065 122,939 47,243 0.030*
www.temporal.com.au Page 26
ALTITUDE = 10000
<-------------- N = 1 ------------->
<-------------MAX POWER-------------> <-------CRUISE POWER------->
T RATE TR/FF P-SUB-S S RNG F FLOW THRUST
MACH CL-M N-MAX DEG/S DEG/LG FT/SEC NM/LB LB/HR LB/ENG CL-C
---- ---- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ------ -----
0.30 1.250 1.77 8.4 0.6 140.9 0.0686 2,792 4,640 0.704*
0.40 1.145 2.89 11.6 0.9 213.3 0.1231 2,074 3,587 0.396
0.50 0.917 3.62 11.9 0.8 280.4 0.1524 2,094 3,615 0.254
0.60 0.761 4.32 12.0 0.8 342.2 0.1545 2,478 4,177 0.176
0.70 0.655 5.06 12.1 0.8 408.6 0.1442 3,098 5,084 0.129
0.80 0.573 5.78 12.2 0.7 470.6 0.1311 3,896 6,260 0.099
0.90 0.485 6.20 11.6 0.7 483.6 0.0974 5,901 9,221 0.078
1.00 0.246 3.88 6.4 0.3 179.9 0.0132 48,299 21,235 0.063
1.10 0.000 1.00 0.0 0.0 -17.6 0.0099 70,729 27,862 0.052
ALTITUDE = 20000
<-------------- N = 1 ------------->
<-------------MAX POWER-------------> <-------CRUISE POWER------->
T RATE TR/FF P-SUB-S S RNG F FLOW THRUST
MACH CL-M N-MAX DEG/S DEG/LG FT/SEC NM/LB LB/HR LB/ENG CL-C
---- ---- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ------ -----
0.30 1.250 1.19 3.8 0.4 68.8 0.0344 5,355 6,269 1.053*
0.40 1.196 2.02 7.8 0.8 128.6 0.0944 2,604 4,181 0.592
0.50 0.964 2.55 8.3 0.8 183.0 0.1410 2,178 3,558 0.379
0.60 0.807 3.07 8.6 0.8 233.8 0.1680 2,195 3,586 0.263
0.70 0.703 3.63 8.9 0.8 291.3 0.1750 2,457 3,984 0.193
0.80 0.622 4.20 9.1 0.7 347.6 0.1700 2,891 4,634 0.148
0.90 0.538 4.60 8.9 0.7 374.4 0.1329 4,162 6,522 0.117
1.00 0.324 3.42 5.8 0.4 197.0 0.0200 30,761 14,524 0.095
1.10 0.208 2.66 4.0 0.3 118.4 0.0149 45,263 18,947 0.078
1.20 0.138 2.09 2.7 0.2 68.2 0.0135 54,696 22,176 0.066
1.30 0.113 2.02 2.4 0.1 61.6 0.0123 64,947 25,436 0.056
1.40 0.087 1.80 1.9 0.1 45.6 0.0115 74,957 28,863 0.048
1.50 0.031 1.00 0.0 0.0 -9.5 0.0107 86,319 33,033 0.042
www.temporal.com.au Page 27
ALTITUDE = 30000
<-------------- N = 1 ------------->
<-------------MAX POWER-------------> <-------CRUISE POWER------->
T RATE TR/FF P-SUB-S S RNG F FLOW THRUST
MACH CL-M N-MAX DEG/S DEG/LG FT/SEC NM/LB LB/HR LB/ENG CL-C
---- ---- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ------ -----
0.40 1.189 1.30 3.9 0.6 42.8 0.0261 9,040 5,599 0.915*
0.50 0.981 1.68 5.0 0.7 89.5 0.0945 3,118 4,155 0.585*
0.60 0.838 2.06 5.6 0.7 134.0 0.1547 2,285 3,607 0.406
0.70 0.732 2.45 5.9 0.7 177.2 0.1854 2,225 3,523 0.299
0.80 0.650 2.84 6.2 0.7 219.4 0.2001 2,356 3,723 0.229
0.90 0.573 3.17 6.2 0.6 249.3 0.1526 3,475 4,794 0.181
1.00 0.378 2.58 4.4 0.4 154.3 0.0284 20,786 9,912 0.146
1.10 0.283 2.34 3.6 0.3 128.7 0.0222 29,225 12,756 0.121
1.20 0.231 2.27 3.1 0.2 124.4 0.0203 34,858 14,824 0.102
1.30 0.203 2.34 3.0 0.2 133.9 0.0183 41,791 16,897 0.087
1.40 0.177 2.37 2.8 0.2 138.0 0.0170 48,562 19,088 0.075
1.50 0.146 2.24 2.5 0.1 119.0 0.0157 56,170 21,756 0.065
1.60 0.113 1.98 2.0 0.1 86.3 0.0148 63,664 24,624 0.057
1.70 0.077 1.52 1.3 0.1 38.5 0.0141 70,942 27,680 0.051
1.80 0.013 1.00 0.0 0.0 -26.5 0.0136 77,950 30,932 0.045
ALTITUDE = 40000
<-------------- N = 1 ------------->
<-------------MAX POWER-------------> <-------CRUISE POWER------->
T RATE TR/FF P-SUB-S S RNG F FLOW THRUST
MACH CL-M N-MAX DEG/S DEG/LG FT/SEC NM/LB LB/HR LB/ENG CL-C
---- ---- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ------ -----
0.50 0.950 1.01 0.6 0.2 2.1 0.0204 14,070 5,705 0.937*
0.60 0.813 1.25 2.4 0.5 36.1 0.0413 8,333 4,413 0.651*
0.70 0.712 1.49 3.0 0.6 67.2 0.0754 5,325 3,788 0.478
0.80 0.634 1.73 3.4 0.6 96.3 0.1198 3,829 3,541 0.366
0.90 0.553 1.91 3.4 0.6 113.7 0.1033 4,998 3,955 0.289
1.00 0.360 1.54 2.2 0.4 57.6 0.0362 15,865 7,048 0.234
1.10 0.292 1.51 2.0 0.3 56.9 0.0301 20,985 8,792 0.194
1.20 0.260 1.60 2.0 0.2 72.9 0.0287 23,974 10,046 0.163
1.30 0.241 1.74 2.1 0.2 93.9 0.0267 27,964 11,277 0.139
www.temporal.com.au Page 28
1.40 0.221 1.85 2.1 0.2 113.5 0.0251 32,024 12,599 0.119
1.50 0.198 1.91 2.1 0.2 121.5 0.0234 36,723 14,214 0.104
1.60 0.175 1.92 1.9 0.2 122.9 0.0221 41,540 15,965 0.091
1.70 0.153 1.89 1.8 0.1 117.4 0.0210 46,394 17,835 0.081
1.80 0.131 1.81 1.6 0.1 103.2 0.0201 51,284 19,835 0.072
1.90 0.108 1.67 1.3 0.1 79.9 0.0194 56,151 21,954 0.065
2.00 0.083 1.42 1.0 0.1 45.8 0.0188 60,981 24,199 0.059
2.10 0.053 1.00 0.0 0.0 -0.4 0.0180 66,943 26,565 0.053
ALTITUDE = 50000
<-------------- N = 1 ------------->
<-------------MAX POWER-------------> <-------CRUISE POWER------->
T RATE TR/FF P-SUB-S S RNG F FLOW THRUST
MACH CL-M N-MAX DEG/S DEG/LG FT/SEC NM/LB LB/HR LB/ENG CL-C
---- ---- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ------ -----
0.60 0.842 1.00 0.0 0.0 -36.9 0.0218 15,758 6,253 1.049*
0.70 0.737 1.00 0.0 0.0 -7.7 0.0323 12,430 4,933 0.771*
0.80 0.655 1.11 1.1 0.3 18.1 0.0436 10,518 4,174 0.590
0.90 0.570 1.22 1.5 0.4 34.2 0.0510 10,118 4,015 0.466
1.00 0.386 1.02 0.4 0.1 3.1 0.0395 14,518 5,761 0.378
1.10 0.285 1.00 0.0 0.0 -12.0 0.0369 17,110 6,790 0.312
www.temporal.com.au Page 29