Processing of Aerospace Materials - I (ME772) : Fracture Toughness and High Cycle Fatigue Date: 11 January 2022
Processing of Aerospace Materials - I (ME772) : Fracture Toughness and High Cycle Fatigue Date: 11 January 2022
Processing of Aerospace Materials - I (ME772) : Fracture Toughness and High Cycle Fatigue Date: 11 January 2022
(ME772)
Fracture toughness and high cycle fatigue
Lecture 3
Date: 11 January 2022
Amol A. Gokhale, Course Instructor
General References:
1. A Mouritz, Aerospace Materials, Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2012 (5.6, 5.8 and
Sections 19.2.3, 19.2.4)
2. W D Callister and David Rethwisch, Materials Science and Engineering, An
Introduction, 2014 (6.6 to 6.9 for tensile and Chapter 8 for fracture toughness)
3. George E Dieter, Mechanical Metallurgy, McGraw Hill Co, 1988 (Chapter 11)
Brittle versus ductile fractures (tensile tests)
Stages in the cup-and-
cone fracture. (a)
Initial necking.
Moderate (b) Small cavity
High ductility ductility Brittle formation. (c)
Coalescence of
cavities to form
a crack. (d) Crack
propagation. (e) Final
shear fracture at a 45
angle relative to the
tensile direction.
Low magnification
• Local stresses near a crack (an atomically sharp notch) depend on the ‘nominal’
stress and the square root of the flaw length (Lecture 2). Stress intensity factor
( ) is defined in terms of the applied (nominal) stress and the crack length.
Yield Strength
• Presence of plastic zone reduces stress concentration at the crack tip. Material
becomes resistant to catastrophic fracture.
• In thick materials, region in the interior is constrained from deforming plastically, hence
has small plastic zone size (Plain strain condition)
• KIc = thickness independent - mode I fracture
Fracture toughness toughness (known as plane strain fracture
toughness or “valid fracture toughness”).
Blue: plastic deformation
Brown: elastic deformation • KIc is the conservative estimate of fracture
toughness and can be used for design
Minimum thickness B needed to obtain
valid KIc value B = 2.5( )
Kt = stress
concentration factor
5 mm 12 mm
Fatigue failures
The possibility of a fatigue failure is the main reason why aircraft components
have a finite life
Fatigue crack initiation
• High Cyclic Fatigue (HCF) is the most common form of fatigue. It refers to low stress
amplitudes at low fractions of yield strength (hence fully elastic) at which the cycles to failure
are high i.e. greater than 104 - 105. The cyclic stress tests are conducted on smooth specimens
and the results are plotted as stress amplitude vs. cycles to failure (S-N curves). The stress
amplitude at which the cycles to failure are very high (or infinite) is called the fatigue strength.
• Low Cycle Fatigue (LCF ) refers to stress amplitudes which exceed the yield strength thus
producing cyclic plastic strain. The cycles to failure are less than 104 - 105. These tests are cyclic
strain controlled conducted on smooth specimens. Plastic strain amplitude vs. cycles to failure
are plotted (Coffin Manson Plots).
• Corrosion fatigue is another common form of fatigue (combined effects of corrosion and cyclic
stress loading)
1 cycle
f = 1-20 Hz
Test specimen
Fully reversed cycle
Different shapes of
cyclic loads
HCF: S-N Curves
Fatigue tests are performed to determine the total number of load cycles to failure
For metals, tension – tension loading is most detrimental
For composites, tension – compression loading is the most detrimental
Typical cycles experienced (flight hours)
15 000–20 000h for modern jet engine materials
80 000 to 120 000 h for airframe materials
Endurance limits
are reported for
tests under fully Why is there endurance
reversed cycles limit for some materials?
Stress amplitude
CT
SENB
Compact tension (CT) test specimen Single-edge notch bend (SENB) test specimen
The method of calculation of fracture toughness Tensile stress is generated at the crack tip.
is covered in ASTM standard E399-T70 The applied load required to grow a crack from
the notch tip through the specimen is used to
calculate the fracture toughness. Tough
materials require a high load to cause complete
fracture of the specimen.
Calculation of fracture toughness (CT specimen)
1. Load versus notch displacement are
plotted.
2. Type I, II and III represent plastic, elastic-
plastic and complete elastic fracture.
These modes indicate how much plastic
deformation takes place ahead of the
crack.
Elastic- Elastic 3. Plastic deformation works against
Plastic
plastic catastrophic failure, since it absorbs
energy, giving high toughness.
1. Type I: Draw line OPS with 5% lower slope than initial slope of load displacement line. Calculate P5.
2. If the load at every point on the record that precedes P5 is lower than P5, then P5 is PQ
3. Type II and III: If there is a maximum load preceding P5 that exceeds it, then this maximum load is PQ
4. PQ is taken as the breaking load to calculate KQ (a tentative value of plane strain fracture toughness).
5. If sample thickness is more than , then it is considered a valid test. If not, there is too much
plastic deformation and KIc method cannot be used (since it is based on brittle fracture theory). We
need to choose a thicker sample in such a case.
6. In such cases, J integral method (not being covered in the course) is resorted to (JIc).
Limited
plasticity
material
Ideal plastic material
Brittle material