Environmental Accounting - An Important Part of An Information System in The Conditions When The Company Approach To The Environment Influences Its Prosperity
Environmental Accounting - An Important Part of An Information System in The Conditions When The Company Approach To The Environment Influences Its Prosperity
Environmental Accounting - An Important Part of An Information System in The Conditions When The Company Approach To The Environment Influences Its Prosperity
3–4 (12–13)
The company approach to the environment may be unambiguously regarded as a factor which, in the present conditions,
influences prosperity of the company. The aim of the paper is to define the system of environmental accounting as an important source
of information supporting decision-making processes in these conditions. Attention is paid to information needs of the individual users
of the system of environmental accounting, resulting in further structuring of the system. In the conclusion, factors which significantly
influence the system of environmental accounting are specified.
Key words: sustainable development, economic-environmental efficiency, environmental accounting, environmental
information
Introduction
From the long-time perspective, business where transformation processes are not accompanied by
processes of adding value, i.e. where these processes do not bring certain economic effect to the entrepreneur,
is not sustainable. Similarly, business without knowing and respecting needs of the customers is not
sustainable. Although business is, unambiguously, connected with economic factors, it is not possible to
prefer solely economic aspects in the business. Also other aspects must be taken into consideration within the
framework of strategic management, as well as in everyday activities and on all levels of management [1].
According to J. Veber, these aspects are as follows:
− qualitative aspects (relating both to the quality of the output of the business activity and
accompanying services itself, as well as to the quality of all company processes);
− time aspects (relating to meeting the set terms and seeking to reduce the time in practically all
business activities); as well as
− other aspects, which are usually regulated by laws and regulations, or are considered by the
company voluntarily (i.e. exceed the scope of the regulations), for example environmental
aspects, aspects of public health and safety etc.
The task of the company management is to aim at finding the factors that will result in success,
perfection, and prosperity of the company. In the present situation, protection of the environment represents a
highly relevant topic. This is true, especially, for the following reasons:
− Negative environmental impacts are connected with the activity of each entity - the company
activities, products and services cause changes of the environment.
− In connection with the company activities, natural resources are consumed, and waste flows are
released into the environment. At the same time, higher and higher accent is put on sustainable use
of resources, waste management, and enforcing the „polluter-must-pay“ principle, within the
framework of international activities, as well as within the framework of state environmental
policy.
− In the latest years, attention to the environmental behaviour of the company is paid by many
interested parties (not only by state institutions, but also by the public and business partners).
It means that adverse impacts of the company activities, products and services on the environment may
significantly endanger its existence, prosperity, and may even result in its liquidation. Attention paid to
technical, safety and environmental requirements is „rewarding“ for the company. Sound approach to the
environment may represent a significant competitive advantage (for example, Veber et al. [1]).
Integrated management is considered to be an important tool of the company on its way to prosperity
(for example, Veber et al. [1]). According to J. Veber, basic recommendations concerning prosperity of
companies may be seen in two main factors:
− It is necessary to ensure proper operating practice of the company, in order to ensure parity of its
operating basis with similar (comparative, competitive) entities. This should be done in all basic
fields (i.e., in economic parameters, quality, as well as time availability in relation to supplied
products or services).
VADYBA / MANAGEMENT. 2006 m. Nr. 3–4 (12–13) 23
− It is necessary to find out and utilise the factors which represent a competitive advantage for the
company.
In a number of companies, it is purposeful to address also environmental aspects in both these factors.
Within the framework of the first item, it is necessary to set the operating basis in the way that the
operation will be sufficiently economical, and, therefore, it will be possible to adapt to the price level of
comparable products, and, at the same time, to guarantee the requested quality, as well as comparable time
dimension concerning flexibility, response to requirements of the customers etc. This is a permanent process.
Companies concentrate its efforts on cost reduction, and on increase of performance of the company. In a
number of sectors, costs spent in connection with environmental protection or as a consequence of
damaging the environment count among significant elements of cost. A highly important method of cost
reduction and increase of efficiency of company processes is management of material and energy flows, as
well as waste flows of all physical states. Attention should be paid also to the utilization of materials and
energy. Operating changes often cause significant investments into new technologies. In connection with
investment projects, it is always sensible to consider impacts of the projects on the environment1.
Within the framework of the second item, it is necessary to find out and utilise the factors which
represent a competitive advantage for the company. Therefore, strategic management activities must exist in
the company, pro-innovation climate must be set, and principle of continual improvement must be an integral
part of the company management. In view of growing importance of the environmental protection, also the
company approach to the environment may become a source of a competitive advantage in the latest years. It
means that issues of the environmental protection are becoming an integral part of the company strategy and
management on the tactical and operational levels - companies implement so-called environmental
management systems. Many companies invest considerable means into research and development activities
whose priority aim is environmental protection (for example, development of environmentally sound
processes and products).
On the basis of the information stated above, the company approach to the environment may be
unambiguously regarded as a factor which, in the present conditions, influences prosperity of the
company. The aim of the paper is to define the system of environmental accounting as an important source of
information supporting decision-making processes in these conditions. Attention is paid to information needs
of the individual users of the system of environmental accounting, resulting in further structuring of the
system. In the conclusion, factors which significantly influence the system of environmental accounting are
specified. The paper is based on available sources of scientific literature, and analyses the individual
approaches to the system.
1
In the Czech Republic, Act No. 244/1992 Coll. on environmental impact assessment (in the wording of subsequent legal regulations) regulates
assessment of impacts of projected buildings (or, optionally, their changes and changes in their use), activities, technologies, development policies and
programmes, and products on the environment, and defines state administration bodies competent to assess these impacts.
On January 1, 2003, Act No. 76/2002 Coll. on integrated pollution prevention and control, on integrated pollution register, and on change of certain
acts, entered into force in the Czech Republic. Within the framework of this Act, there is defined scope of facilities in the case of which their operators
must obtain an integrated permit for their operation. These are facilities from the sectors of energy production, metallurgy, use of mineral resources,
chemical productions, waste treatment, pig and chicken factory farms, food industry and other industries.
2
Since 1995, the name of this organisation is World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD).
24 VADYBA / MANAGEMENT. 2006 m. Nr. 3–4 (12–13)
sector, or the whole industry; the inputs represent the sum of environmental pressures generated by the
company, sector, or the whole industry [5].
From the above-mentioned approaches, it is obvious that eco-efficiency evaluates relations between
outputs of a given process and its inputs. A higher eco-efficiency (of a process, product or company) may be
achieved either by increasing outputs (effects) from the inputs (resources) allocated to realisation, or by
obtaining the requested outputs (effects) with a minimum consumption of inputs (resources). Considering the
fact that the aim of economic behaviour is to manage „scarcity“ (problems), so that the process proceeded in
the best possible way, it is necessary to fill information needs of the management so that its efforts could
concentrate on achieving the required results.
If the company aims at significant improvement of eco-efficiency (i.e., at implementation of measures
for environmental protection), then it will be possible to achieve considerable benefits both in the field of
economic performance of the company, and in the field of improving its environmental performance. Slower
improvement of eco-efficiency may bring either improvement of economic situation of the company at the
expense of worsening its environmental performance, or improvement of its environmental performance
achieved at the expense of worsening economic performance.
Company strategy concentrating on significant improvement of eco-efficiency is designated as a win-
win strategy - it means considerable improvement both of economic situation of the company, and of its
environmental performance [6]. At present, the process of integration of environmental aspects into business
approaches is still in progress, and new strategies are developed which can contribute to improvement of eco-
efficiency [7].
The conception of eco-efficiency does not involve the third pillar of sustainable development - the
social field. However, it must be said that concentration on eco-efficiency does not mean refusal of
principles of sustainable development. Improvements in the field of eco-efficiency may significantly
help in implementation of the conception of sustainable development in the business practice. At
present, the efforts, especially of international organisations, concentrate on development of
approaches to measurement of social performance in a quantitative way [8; 9] and on interconnection
of the social field with the conception of eco-efficiency. This will interconnect all three pillars of
sustainable development.
of the environmental information. The information system must be able to provide information to
the relevant responsible staff members (managers) in the form enabling them to make decision. The
management must:
− have quick access to necessary information (without time delay);
− have possibility to examine company data in integrated form, as well as in detailed form - it
means on different levels of aggregation (the top management is usually interested in data
concerning the company as a whole, the management on lower levels usually works with
detailed data);
− have possibility to analyse the established data;
− easily detect trends of planned or managed processes; and
− have possibility to continuously communicate and discuss the established facts.
The most important aim of the information system is to optimise the company performance.
Development of an information system fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements is connected with
costs. In order that the environmental information be relevant for the company, the costs spent on
development (or, optionally, adaptations) of the information system must be lower than benefits which the
company obtains from use of this information. It seems suitable to incorporate monitoring of environmental
information into the existing company information system [10; 11; 12]. In the company practice, it is
necessary to make use of the principle of system interconnection during development of information systems,
and to develop comprehensive company information systems which should:
− support intentions, aims, and priorities of the company as a whole;
− provide complete and relevant information on the company, its development, but also on the
surroundings of the company;
− support all significant company processes, both internal (purchasing, production, sale, financial
management, environmental management etc.), and external (links to suppliers, customers, banks,
state bodies etc.);
− have a simple and transparent architecture;
− be integrated from the point of view of data, function, software, hardware, as well as from the
methodical point of view.
It means that the mission of the company information system should be development of a consistent
system, because only such system is a significant precondition for formulation and implementation of
effective strategic intentions. It is necessary to mention still another feature of the company information
system: openness of the system. This is the ability:
− to express reflection of both external and internal environment in the information;
− to receive and store information from external environment;
− to adapt itself to the surrounding environment by using the collected information;
− to reproduce its organism as a system, and, through that, to enable survival of the system in
changing conditions.
If a sound approach to the environment and improvements of economic performance belong
among the aims of the company, then it is obvious that the management, as well as other interested
parties, must have at their disposal information concerning the environmental aspects and impacts of
the company activities, products and services on the environment, as well as their economic
consequences. The above-mentioned information is provided by a system of environmental accounting.
The environmental accounting does not concentrate solely on the field of eco-efficiency. Efficiency is only
one of the aims sought for by the management. It is not possible to neglect another of the aims - effectiveness.
The effectiveness belongs among important criterions of a reasonable course of the business process.
3
The same division of environmental information is used by R. Burritt, T. Hahn and S. Schaltegger [20].
VADYBA / MANAGEMENT. 2006 m. Nr. 3–4 (12–13) 27
environmental impacts caused by the company. Therefore, a subsystem has been detached from the
accounting system of the company, which provides information on economic consequences of influence of
the company on the environment. In view of the fact that also information on environmental aspects and
impacts of the company activities, products and services on the environment must be available for assessment
of the environmental performance of the company, a need has developed to produce an information
subsystem identifying, collecting, recording, analysing and reporting environmental information,
designated as environmental accounting.
Various interested parties are interested in environmental information. In the case of certain users, main
attention is paid to economic consequences of influence of the company on the environment; other users are
interested primarily in environmental aspects and impacts. Environmental aspects of the company may
significantly influence economic results of the company (not only concerning costs, but also concerning
revenues) and its financial position. Attention to economic consequences of the company approach to the
environment is paid not only by the company management, but also by other interested parties. Investors and
creditors are primarily interested, on the one hand, in impacts of environmental behaviour of the company on
its financial health, and, on the other hand, in environmental risks and extent of liabilities arising from these
risks. Naturally, also owners are interested in environmental behaviour of the company. Their attention is paid
to economic consequences of environmental behaviour of the company and their impacts on return on
investment. Other interested parties, for example, customers, suppliers, competing companies, state bodies,
the public, mass media, movements and initiatives concerned with environmental protection etc., also pay
attention to the company approach to the environment. Some interested parties (for example, the public,
movements and initiatives concerned with environmental protection) are primarily interested in impacts of the
company activities, products and services on the environment. Therefore, it is obvious that needs in the field
of environmental information are very diverse. The task of environmental accounting is to fill information
needs of all important interested parties.
There is obvious from the previous text that environmental accounting must be designed so that it
provides information enabling to assess environmental behaviour of the company and its economic
consequences - therefore, parts of the system are both information in monetary units (financial information)
and information in physical units (non-financial information). Furthermore, it is necessary to ensure that
different information needs of various interested parties are filled. It means that also the conception of
environmental accounting is based on the basic recognition influencing development of accounting systems in
the 20th century: method of reflecting the business process should be differentiated according to the
users of the accounting information and according to decision-making tasks for support of which the
accounting information is used. Consequently, the conventional accounting system of the company is
divided into three basic subsystems [21]:
− management accounting - its main aim is to reflect the business process from the point of view of
information needs of the management, namely of all staff members on various levels of the
company management - the provided information serves to support management of the business
process;
− financial accounting - its main aim is to fill information needs of external users (primarily, owners,
creditors, business partners, employees, entities participating in financial and capital market),
which, although stay out of the assessed entity, are connected with it and its development by both
future benefits and future risks;
− tax accounting - the aim of this accounting subsystem is to reflect the same business process with
the purpose to correctly determine the income basis, as well as other tax lien and liabilities of the
company.
In the case of the financial and tax accounting, the users press on unification of terms and processes
so that the information submitted in individual cases are comparable. To the contrary, the management
accounting is characterised by the fact that practically no regulation from outside of the company exists. This
accounting subsystem is not uniformly defined even concerning its aim, contents or structure, and even a
unified term is not used for this subsystem [21]. Therefore, the above-mentioned requirements are a criterion
for further structuring of environmental accounting.
28 VADYBA / MANAGEMENT. 2006 m. Nr. 3–4 (12–13)
FINANCIAL NON-FINANCIAL
INFORMATION INFORMATION
(in monetary units) (in physical units)
OTHER
INFORMATION for internal users for internal users
ENVIRONMENTAL
INFORMATION for internal users for internal users
Environmental accounting
When taking into consideration various types of users and their information needs, the system of
environmental accounting can be divided into the following parts:
a) Environmental accounting in monetary units, which is formed by the following subsystems:
− Environmental management accounting (in monetary units) - it concentrates on financial
information for internal users. It represents the main information tool and the basis for the
most part of management decisions. It should provide, for example, responses to the
following questions: What are the costs spent for protection of the environment (so-called
environmental costs), and how should they be identified and monitored? How should the
environmentally induced costs be treated, i.e., whether they should be allocated to the
products, or managed as overhead costs? etc.
− Environmental financial accounting (in monetary units) - it is destined for filling needs of,
primarily, external users in the field of financial information. Object of its attention are
environmentally induced impacts on the financial position of the company and its economic
results.
VADYBA / MANAGEMENT. 2006 m. Nr. 3–4 (12–13) 29
Conclusions
The development of the systems of environmental accounting was influenced by many factors (see, for
example [13; 16; 26]. As the most important factors, especially the following ones can be considered:
1. Philosophy and tools used within the framework of environmental accounting may significantly
help in the development of the society, designated as sustainable development. The system enables
to assess approach to the environment, and the environmental performance, and facilitates
(mediates) communication in the field of the environmental protection between managers and other
interested parties.
2. Conceptual division of accounting for internal and external users is based on the fact that the need
of information, the level of its details, as well as the level of its confidentiality, are different for
various interested parties (i.e., for various users of the system). It can be proved that concentration
of the system on information needs of the management (i.e., internal users) may bring significant
effects concerning decision-making processes in the company. If the company information system
is designed, primarily, according to information needs of external interested parties, then this can
result in deformations in collection and use of information for decision-making [27; 28].
3. The company management uses various information to support its decision-making processes.
Certain managers rely especially on financial information, others prefer non-financial information.
A number of managers work, within the framework of their decision-making, with both financial
and non-financial information. The need of information relates very closely to the level of
management. For example, the environmental management on the level of the company must fulfil,
especially, the following aims:
- identify possibilities of improvements of the environmental performance of the company;
- set priorities of the individual environmental activities and measures;
30 VADYBA / MANAGEMENT. 2006 m. Nr. 3–4 (12–13)
REFERENCES
1. Veber J et al. (2000) Management – basics, prosperity, globalization Prague, Management Press (available only in Czech)
2. Schaltegger S und Sturm A (1990) Ökologische Rationalität: Ansatzpunkte zur Ausgestaltung von ökologieorientierten
Managementinstrumenten Die Unternehmung 4, 273-290
3. BCSD (Business Council for Sustainable Development) (1993) Getting Eco-Efficient: How Can Business Contribute to
Sustainable Development? in Proceedings of The First Antwerp Eco-Efficiency Workshop Antwerp, Organized in Association
with the Industry and Environment Office of the United Nations Environment Programme and the Commission of the European
Communities, Directorate-General XI
4. Schmidheiny S (1992) Changing Course: A Global Business Perspective on Development and the Environment Cambridge, MIT
Press, with the Business Council for Sustainable Development
5. OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) (1998) Eco-efficiency Paris, OECD
6. Walley N and Whitehead B (1994) It´s not Easy Being Green Harvard Business Review May/June 1994, 46-52
7. Reinhardt F L (1999) Bringing the Environment Down to Earth Harvard Business Review July/August 1999, 149-157
8. GRI (Global Reporting Initiative) (2004) Sustainability Reporting Guidelines 2002 [online] [cited 15 November 2004] Available
from internet URL http://www.globalreporting.org
9. McPhail K and Davy A (1998) Integrating Social Concerns into Private Sector Decision making: A Review of Corporate
Practices in the Mining, Oil and Gas Sectors Washington, World Bank
10. Gray R (1993) Accounting for the Environment New York, Markus Weiner Publishing
11. Hřebíček J (1999) Information Society and Privilege on Environmental Information in Matyska L (ed.) Proceedings from
Conference RUFIS 99 Brno, 45-52 (available only in Czech)
12. Hřebíček J (2003) Globale Umwelt-informationssysteme in Internationalen Masstab in Internationales Umweltmanagement,
Band II: Umweltmanagementinstrumente und – systeme Wiesbaden, Gabler Verlag, 53-75
13. EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (1995) An Introduction to Environmental Accounting As A Business
Management Tool: Key Concepts And Terms (EPA 742-R-95-001) Washington, United States Environmental Protection
Agency, Office of Pollution Prevention And Toxics (MC 7409)
14. Schaltegger S and Stinson C (1994) Issues and Research Opportunities in Environmental Accounting (discussion paper 9124)
Basel, Wirtschafts-wissenschaftliches Zentrum WWZ
15. Gray R et al. (1996) Accounting and Accountability: Changes and Challenges in Corporate Social and Environmental Reporting
London, Prentice Hall Europe
16. Schaltegger S and Burritt R (2000) Contemporary Environmental Accounting Sheffield, Greenleaf Publishing
17. ISO 14001 (1996) Environmental Management Systems – Specification with Guidance for Use, International Standard
Organization
18. Environmental Dictionary (1998) Prague, Planet and Fountain (available only in Czech)
19. Horngren C et al. (2000) Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis Englewood Cliffs, Prentice – Hall
20. EMAN – EU (2004) Burritt R, Hahn T and Schaltegger S (2001) Current Developments in Environmental Management
Accounting – Towards a Comprehensive Framework for Environmental Management Accounting [online] [cited 20 June 2004]
Available from internet URL http://www.eman-eu.net
21. Král B et al. (2002) Management Accounting Prague, Management Press (available only in Czech)
22. Bennett M and James P (1998) The Green Bottom Line in Bennett M and James P (eds.) The Green Bottom Line. Environmental
Accounting for Management: Current Practice and Future Trends Sheffield, Greenleaf Publishing 30-60
23. ECOMAC (1996) EIM Small Business Research and Consultancy Synreport: Eco-Management Accounting as a Tool of
Environmental Management (The ECOMAC Project) [online] [cited 20 June 2002] Available from internet URL
<http://www.eim.nl/uk/nl/ecomac.html>
24. IFAC (International Federation of Accountants) (1998) Environmental Management in Organizations. The Role of Management
Accounting New York, Financial and Management Committee, International Federation of Accountants, Study 6, March 1998
25. Schaltegger S, Hahn T and Burritt R (2001) Environmental Management Accounting – Overview and Main Approaches in
Seifert E and Kreeb M (eds.) Environmental Management Accounting and the Role of Information Systems Sheffield, Greenleaf
Publishing
26. Schaltegger S et al. (1996) Corporate Environmental Accounting Chichester, Wiley and Sons
27. Kaplan R (1984) The Evolution of Management Accounting The Accounting Review LIX, 3, 390-418
28. Bennett M and James P (1999) Key Themes in Environmental, Social and Sustainability Performance Evaluation and Reporting
in Bennett M and James P (eds.) Sustainable Measures. Evaluation and Reporting of Environmental and Social Performance
Sheffield, Greenleaf 29-74
29. Schaltegger S und Sturm A (1992) Ökologieorientierte Entscheidungen in Unternehmen. Ökologisches Rechnungswesen Statt
Ökobilanzierung. Notwendigkeit, Kriterien, Konzepte Bern, Haupt
30. Schaltegger S and Sturm A (1998) Eco-Efficiency by Eco-Controlling Zürich, Vdf.
31. Horngren C and Foster G (1987) Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis (6th ed.) Englewood Cliffs, Prentice – Hall