Assesment Module5
Assesment Module5
Assesment Module5
Filibusterismo.
DIFFERENCES
NOLI ME TANGERE
1. Romantic novel
2. Book of heart
3. Book of feeling
4. It has freshness, color,humor and intelligence.
5. Contains 64 chapters
6.Noli Metangere, Latin title meaning "touch me not" refers to the letter of John
20:17 in King James version of the Bible as Mary Magdalene tried to touch the
newly risen Jesus, He said "Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my
Father".
6. Dedicated to our motherland.
7. Noli showed a sofspoken, patient, compassionate and idealistic Crisostomo
Ibarra .
8. Noli is written in the idea that would expose the ills of Philippine society after
Harriet Beecher Stowe's Uncle Tom's Cabin. In general Noli is more on the
reformist side of Rizal.
SIMILARITIES
NOLI ME TANGERE
AND
EL FILIBUSTERISMO
Noli Me Tangere and El filibusterismo are the two marked novels of our
national hero, written by Dr. Jose Rizal which are similar and different in
some ways.
Both talk about how Spaniards abused the Filipinos, the abuse of the
church of their power and the discrimination on Filipinos.
Both Noli and El Fili shows strong anti-Clerical and even anti-Catholic
color. They convey one story because the latter is published in sequel or
continuation.
Both talk about how Spaniards abused the Filipinos, the abuse of the
church of their power and the discrimination on Filipinos.
Both Noli and El Fili shows strong anti-Clerical and even anti-Catholic
color.
DIFFERENCES
EL FILIBUSTERISMO
1. Political novel
2. Work of the head
3. Book of thought
4. It has hatred, bitterness, pain, violence, and sorrow.
Contains 38 chapters
5. El filibusterismo is Spanish title which is known in english as The Reign of Greed.
6. Dedicated to GOMBURZA.
7. More on action and motion, the latter is thoughtful, discursive and dialectal.
8. El Fili featured a different Ibarra who portrayed the angry and vengeful side of
him and disguised himself as the wealthy jeweller named Simoun.
9. El fili is on revolutionist.
At the same time, Rizal showed in these works how some Filipinos were
complicit in the colonial enterprise: from middle-class professionals who
remained silent in the face of wrongdoings to ostensibly religious churchgoers
who perpetuated repressive social structures.The "Noli" and "Fili" were not eye-
openers in the sense that Filipinos during Rizal's time did not have to read about
colonial abuses in a novel that was barely in circulation (colonial authorities
banned the book, and only a small number were smuggled into the country)
and written in a language that limited its accessibility to the educated elite —
such abuses were everywhere.
Regarding the present system of governing the Philippines through corrupt and
self- seeking officials dominated by the friars and being submissive to their
interests in one fashion or another that can only be lead to disaster for Spain.
Everyone agrees on the fact that El Filibusterismo is far more dark and
brutal that Noli Me Tangere. With many events of murder, sexual abuse and
suicide, El Filibusterismo is a massive turning point not only for the plot but also for
the characters. Crisostomo Ibarra really did grow as a character in this book. He
is obliviously not the idealistic and open man he was once before. He became
vengeful, angry and in somewhat way, cunning and in my opinion, this
transformation of his is very much human and real. In terms of moral lesson, El
Filibusterismo is what I'd choose over Noli Me Tangere. El Filibusterismo showed us
how anger and vengeance can take over a person's being.
El FIlibusterismo also shares the theme that violence is not the answer with Noli
Me Tangere.