Cambridge IGCSE: Business Studies 0450/22
Cambridge IGCSE: Business Studies 0450/22
Cambridge IGCSE: Business Studies 0450/22
IMPORTANT NOTICE
Mark Schemes have been issued on the basis of one copy per Assistant examiner and two copies per Team
Leader.
STM version
03_0450_22_2021_1.8
© UCLES 2021
These general marking principles must be applied by all examiners when marking candidate
answers. They should be applied alongside the specific content of the mark scheme or generic level
descriptors for a question. Each question paper and mark scheme will also comply with these
marking principles.
GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 1:
• the specific content of the mark scheme or the generic level descriptors for the question
• the specific skills defined in the mark scheme or in the generic level descriptors for the
question
Marks awarded are always whole marks (not half marks, or other fractions).
GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 3:
• marks are awarded for correct/valid answers, as defined in the mark scheme. However,
credit is given for valid answers which go beyond the scope of the syllabus and mark
scheme, referring to your Team Leader as appropriate
• marks are awarded when candidates clearly demonstrate what they know and can do
• answers should only be judged on the quality of spelling, punctuation and grammar when
these features are specifically assessed by the question as indicated by the mark scheme.
The meaning, however, should be unambiguous.
GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 4:
Rules must be applied consistently e.g. in situations where candidates have not followed
instructions or in the application of generic level descriptors.
GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 5:
Marks should be awarded using the full range of marks defined in the mark scheme for the
question (however; the use of the full mark range may be limited according to the quality of the
candidate responses seen).
GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 6:
Marks awarded are based solely on the requirements as defined in the mark scheme. Marks should
not be awarded with grade thresholds or grade descriptors in mind.
Page 3 of 16
For example: There is unlimited liability (1) that means the owner’s
personal possessions are at risk of being taken to pay any debts of
the business. (1)
Well-justified conclusion.
Candidates discussing both orders in detail, in context
and with well-justified conclusion including why the
alternative order was rejected should be rewarded with
the top marks in the band.
9-12
5-8
1-4
0 No creditable response. 0
Well-justified recommendation.
Candidates discussing both types of marketing in detail,
in context and with well-justified recommendation
including why the alternative market was rejected should
be rewarded with the top marks in the band.
9-12
5-8
1-4
0 No creditable response. 0
Well-justified recommendation.
Candidates discussing all three applicants in detail, in
context and with well-justified recommendation including
why the alternative applicants are rejected should be
rewarded with the top marks in the band.
9-12
5-8
1-4
0 No creditable response. 0
Recommendation
• Vivaan should be chosen as he has the most experience
and this may help to increase output and improve efficiency
for ST. Aarav lacks experience even though he is well
qualified in management and Sai has not been an
Operations Manager only an Assistant so also lacks the
relevant experience when compared to Vivaan.
4(b) Consider how the following two changes might affect ST. 12
Which change is likely to have the most effect on ST’s
revenue? Justify your answer.
Well-justified conclusion.
Candidates discussing both changes in detail, in context
and with well-justified conclusion including why the
alternative change is rejected should be rewarded with the
top marks in the band.
9-12
5-8
1-4
0 No creditable response. 0