Drugs & Cosmetic Act - Judgement6
Drugs & Cosmetic Act - Judgement6
Drugs & Cosmetic Act - Judgement6
I
Bail Application No. 583 of 2021.
Date of Instt. : 07.05.2021
CNR No. CHCH010027582021.
Date of order : 20.05.2021.
UID No.HR 0142
Philip Jacob, Aged about 47 years, S/o late Thomas Jacob, R/o Auxilium Pala
Lalam, Kottayam, District Kottayam, State Kerala, India
......Applicant.
Versus.
State of U.T. Chandigarh.
.....Respondent.
II
K.P. Francis, aged 59 years s/o Sh. Tharian Payapilli Paulose, R/o House
No.723/A, Payya Koluvan, Mannanam Athirampuza, Kottayam, Kerala,
India,
Narender
Addional Sessions Judge
Chandigarh
......Applicant.
Versus.
State of U.T. Chandigarh.
.....Respondent.
III
Bail Application No. 592 of 2021.
Date of Instt. : 11.05.2021
CNR No. CHCH010027922021.
Date of order : 20.05.2021.
UID No.HR 0142
Susheel Kumar, Aged about 38 years, S/o Ram Saran, Through his Pairokar
brother Sh. Mridul Moudgil, Age about 31 years, both are R/o 9/7 FF, Kalka
Ji Extn., Nehru Enclave, Kalka Ji, South Delhi, India
......Applicant.
Versus.
State of U.T. Chandigarh.
.....Respondent.
IV
Narender
Addional Sessions Judge
Chandigarh
Bail Application No. 602 of 2021.
Date of Instt. : 13.05.2021
CNR No. CHCH010028232021.
Date of order : 20.05.2021.
UID No.HR 0142
Gaurav Chawla, Aged 41 years, s/o Sh. Desraj Chawla, R/o House No.349,
Mamta Enclave, Dhakoli, Zirakpur, District Mohali, Punjab.
......Applicant.
Versus.
State of U.T. Chandigarh.
.....Respondent.
Prabhat Tyagi, aged 48 years, S/o Sh. Chandra Raj Singh Tyagi, R/o House
No.G-2/189, Gulmohar Colony, Huzur, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh
......Applicant.
Versus.
State of U.T. Chandigarh.
.....Respondent.
Narender
Addional Sessions Judge
Chandigarh
Bail Application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
ORDER :
1. Vide this order, this court shall dispose off as many as five regular bail
applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C., arising out of the same FIR bearing No.56
dated 18.04.2021, U/Ss 420, 120-B IPC, Section 7 E.C. Act and Section 27 of Drugs
was received to the effect that as many as 4-5 persons who were staying in Hotel Taj,
Sector-17, Chandigarh had met some customers in connection with the sale of
medicine i.e. Remdesvir. These persons were not authorized for the said purpose as
they had no permit or license in this regard. Upon the said secret information, the
police team headed by ASI Surjit Singh reached at Hotel Taj and found some persons
sitting there and discussing. One person was holding a box mentioning Remdesvir
Health Biotech in his right hand. They were apprehended and disclosed their
identities. Further, after interrogation, a raid was conducted at M/s Health Biotech
Pvt. Ltd., Nalagarh Road, Baddi, Himachal Pradesh with concerned Drug Inspectors
and total 30 boxes containing 100 injections of Remdesvir in each box (total 3000
3. It was argued by the learned counsel appearing for the applicants that
Narender
Addional Sessions Judge
Chandigarh
they have been falsely implicated in this case for no fault on their part. It was also
argued that co-accused Paramjit Singh Arora who is the owner of M/s Health Biotech
Company from where the alleged 3000 injections of Remdesvir were recovered, has
since been granted interim bail by the court of Dr. Pankaj, the then learned ASJ,
Chandigarh. The applicants did not hatch any criminal conspiracy in order to cheat
any person of the society. Further, the applicants did not take undue profit by selling
Remdesvir injection in black at any point of time. Trial will take long time to
conclude and no useful purpose will be served by keeping the applicants in judicial
custody for any longer period. There is no other case pending against any of the
applicants.
recovery was effected from him nor he had given any order for Remdesvir to M/s
are attracted against him. Lastly, it was argued that the provisions of Drugs &
counsel by putting on record his written submissions (without court fee) that this
applicant was having drug license and was entitled to trade in pharmaceutical
has been falsely implicated in this case by showing him as the seller of Remdesvir
medicine. Further, the recovery of one injection of Remdesvir was recovered from co-
accused Abhishek P.V. The other alleged recovery of 3000 injections of the same drug
Narender
Addional Sessions Judge
Chandigarh
was made from M/s Health Biotech, Himachal Pradesh. The other entire written
submissions placed on record on part of applicant have been gone through by this
court. The learned counsel has also relied upon the case of “ Union of India Vs.
Ashok Kumar Sharma & Ors. 2020 (3) RCR (Criminal) 726 (SC) ”. This case
law has been perused by this court in the light of the facts and submissions put fourth
counsel appearing on his behalf that the said applicant has his pharmaceutical
company named after “Seatrack International Tradex Pvt. Ltd” and his dealing with
“M/s Rescuers Life Sciences Ltd”. was absolutely lawful. The applicant had also
The employees of “M/s Rescuers Life Sciences Ltd”. had proposed that a sister
concern of their company namely M/s Health Biotech Pvt. Ltd. was authorized
manufacturer of Remdesvir medicine and was looking for a prospective whole sale
dealer. The petitioner had no reason to disbelieve the same and went at its registered
office in Chandigarh for discussions who was further invited for further discussions at
Hotel Taj on 18.04.2021. The present FIR is based on a concocted story and the
applicant has been falsely implicated in the same who is an innocent person. No
recovery was effected from him and no offence is made out against the said applicant.
innocent person and has no connection with the alleged offence. He has been falsely
involved in this case by the police by projecting a false story. Nothing was recovered
from his custody. The alleged case property was further not recovered from him.
Narender
Addional Sessions Judge
Chandigarh
4.5 On part of applicant Prabhat Tyagi, it was argued by his learned counsel
about his false implication in the present FIR. Section 7 of Essential Commodity Act
is bailable offence. Further, it was argued that prosecution under Section 32 of the
Drugs & Cosmetics Act, 1940 under Chaper-IV can be instituted by Inspector or by
authorized to launch prosecution under Section 27 of the Act. Lastly, it was argued
that the applicant is in custody since the date of his arrest and no useful purpose
would be served by keeping him in judicial custody for any longer period. The
learned counsel has also placed his reliance upon the case of Union of India Vs.
Ashok Kumar Sharma & Ors. 2020 (3) RCR (Criminal) 726 (SC).
that mere long custody does not make the applicants entitled to be granted concession
of bail. There are serious allegations against the applicants as they had hatched a
period. In case, they are given concession of bail, they can abscond from the trial of
the case and will also hamper the on going process of investigation. It was further
argued that the applicants tried to cheat the general public by hatching criminal
conspiracy to deal in the sale of Remdesvir injections in black just to amash wealth.
knowing well that the Remdesvir injection was deeply required to the serious Covid-
19 Pandemic patients to save their valuable lives being an essential drug as part of
essential commodity. In this regard, the learned Addl. PP has placed his reliance upon
the judgment dated 30.04.2021 passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Suo Motu Writ
Petition (Civil) No.3 of 2021 . The same has been gone through by this court in the
Narender
Addional Sessions Judge
Chandigarh
light of the above referred submissions of the learned PP. The bail applications in
law that mere long custody does not make the accused entitled to be given concession
of bail. As per the contents of the FIR, a deal for the sale of Remdesvir injection
manufactured by M/s Health Biotech Pvt. Ltd. was going on at Hotel Taj when the
raid was conducted by the police in the light of a secret information received to it. It is
an admitted fact that M/s Health Biotech Pvt. Ltd. was not granted any license for
domestic supply of the said drug namely Remdesvir injection. It is further an admitted
fact that the authorities of M/s Health Biotech Pvt. Ltd. had only written to the
concerned government authorities to give them permission for the supply of the said
drug. Thus, from the contents of the FIR and the rival submissions of the learned
counsel for the parties, it has prima facie come before the court that M/s Health
Biotech Pvt. Ltd. had manufactured Remdesvir injection without the prior permission
market. Some of the applicants/accused who had traveled from the Southern States of
the country up to Chandigarh thus, did not verify properly this fact that the
manufacturer with whom they were dealing to purchase the said drug was not yet
same in the domestic market. This fact some where shows that the intention of the
applicants was not up to the mark. It is the fact which is further clear from the
prevailing scenario that the Remdesvir injection was severely and deeply required for
the Covid-19 Pandemic serious patients which they were not getting easily just to
Narender
Addional Sessions Judge
Chandigarh
save their precious and valuable life. In these circumstances, the case law relied on
the part of the applicants is not of any help for them in the given facts and
circumstances though this court has the utmost respect to the law laid down therein.
Accordingly, all the above titled five bail applications are dismissed finding no merit
therein.
7. However, it is made clear that a copy of this order be also placed in all
the connected bail applications referred above to avoid any confusion in future.
Further, it is made clear that the above observations shall have no bearing on the
merits of the case as the same have been given only for the purpose to decide the
Note: All the nine pages of this order have been checked and signed by me.
(Narender),
Addl. Sessions Judge,
Chandigarh 20.05.2021.
(UID No.HR 0142)
Sandeep
Stenographer-II
Narender
Addional Sessions Judge
Chandigarh
Philip Jacob Vs. State
Arguments heard.
Order pronounced.
present bail application, the present bail application as well as all other four
connected bail applications titled as K.P. Francis Vs. State bearing CNR
also kept in the consolidated bail applications to avoid any future confusion.
Pronounced: ( Narender )
20.05.2021 Additional Sessions Judge,
Chandigarh
UID No.HR0142
Narender
Addional Sessions Judge
Chandigarh
K.P. Francis Vs. State
Arguments heard.
Order pronounced.
copy of the main order be also kept in the present bail application to avoid
any future confusion. File be consigned to the record room after due
compliance.
Pronounced: ( Narender )
20.05.2021 Additional Sessions Judge,
Chandigarh
UID No.HR0142
Narender
Addional Sessions Judge
Chandigarh
Susheel Kumar Vs. State of U.T. Chandigarh.
Arguments heard.
Order pronounced.
copy of the main order be also kept in the present bail application to avoid
any future confusion. File be consigned to the record room after due
compliance.
Pronounced: ( Narender )
20.05.2021 Additional Sessions Judge,
Chandigarh
UID No.HR0142
Narender
Addional Sessions Judge
Chandigarh
Gaurav Chawla Vs. State
Arguments heard.
Order pronounced.
copy of the main order be also kept in the present bail application to avoid
any future confusion. File be consigned to the record room after due
compliance.
Pronounced: ( Narender )
20.05.2021 Additional Sessions Judge,
Chandigarh
UID No.HR0142
Narender
Addional Sessions Judge
Chandigarh
Prabhat Tyagi Vs. State
Arguments heard.
Order pronounced.
copy of the main order be also kept in the present bail application to avoid
any future confusion. File be consigned to the record room after due
compliance.
Pronounced: ( Narender )
20.05.2021 Additional Sessions Judge,
Chandigarh
UID No.HR0142
Narender
Addional Sessions Judge
Chandigarh