Executive Summary: Facebook Ipo

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

FACEBOOK IPO

Executive summary
This report is aimed to provide consulting and assistance to CXT in evaluating Facebook’s IPO and
accordingly deciding to invest in it or not.

A social networking platform, Facebook was started in 2004 by Mark Zuckerberg, initially attracting
college students. Facebook’s growth was rapid in its initial years and soon it dominated the market.
Facebook’s IPO decision in 2011 was a no-brainer with its exponential growth over the years. But it is
important to consider the fact that Facebook didn’t pay dividends and that there might be a chance of
paying too much for its stock. Hence a careful evaluation of Facebook’s returns is needed.

Here, a discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis and market multiples approach can help make the right
estimate of the value of Facebook. Not just quantitative, but also a qualitative analysis of the
Facebook’s IPO – its purpose, future goals, the potential of the sector, competition landscape at the
time etc. should be carried out before making the decision.

Important Considerations and Analysis


Facebook has ensured strong user engagement on its platform by introducing features such as posting
messages publicly, sharing comments, uploading photos etc. The core value offered here for users was
not just the engagement bit but also the user experience of having to use a simple and intuitive
interface. This high level of user engagement ensured that Facebook could not only entice advertisers
on its platform but also provide them a clear direction on how to deliver advertisements based on
user’s preferences. So, to make money, Facebook mainly leverages advertising revenues. The
balance of its revenues comes through its payments business - mostly the sale of virtual goods via
Zynga. The following table shows its revenues 3 years prior to IPO:

2009 2010 2011


Advertising Revenues (% total revenue) 98% 95% 85%
Payment business revenues (in million dollars) $13 million $106 million $557 million

Facebook has quickly gained a competitive edge over its competitors owing to its robust business
model and a large and satisfied user base. From 1 million monthly users in 2004, Facebook
established its foothold in the industry and reached a remarkable 845 million monthly user base by
2011. Leveraging technology, Facebook has access to great bit of user data which not only drives its
revenues but also helps to make relevant update/changes to its platform to meet growing user needs.
Another way Facebook has gained competitive advantage was through acquisitions (gained on new
tech, talented resource pools).
Facebook IPO’s stated purpose was to globally connect all internet users (~ 2 billion users). It also
factored in the rise of online social networking around the world as well as increasing competition
that came along with it. The decision was affirmed even more so because going for an IPO will enable
Facebook to use public equity markets and motivate and enable its current shareholders to
participate. Funds were important for Facebook and the proceeds, as already decided, would be used
for working capital and other general corporate purposes.
At this time (2011) though, the US economy has still been feeling the effects of a fragile, global
economic environment. The IPO market was no exception. Though the S&P 500 index has grown
21% in May 2012 from November 2011 but then it fell by 5% in the first half of May. This
uncertainty and volatility in the market dynamics had led to sharp 70% decrease in global IPO
activity (from quarter 1 value of $46.6 billion in 2011 to $14.3 billion in 2012).

Also, the recent IPOs at this time (LinkedIn, Groupon, Zynga) hadn’t performed as per
expectations with their total returns falling by the end of 1 st month after launch. The launch was
welcomed for Groupon and LinkedIn on the first few days but eventually declined by the end of
month. For Zynga, the IPO’s performance was dissatisfactory (with negative returns from 1 st day).
The performance of these three IPOs is also depicted in Exhibit 1 towards the end of this report.
Appendix
Exhibit 1 : Recent Technology IPOs (2011)

You might also like