The document summarizes an experiment to investigate period doubling bifurcation in a chaotic oscillator circuit. Key findings include:
1) As the amplitude of the input signal increased, the period of the output waveform was observed to double, indicating bifurcation.
2) The Feigenbaum number, relating the amplitude changes at which period doubling occurs, was calculated experimentally to be 3.001V on average, compared to the theoretical value of 4.669V.
3) Limitations in the experiment led to a high percentage uncertainty of 35.72%, indicating the need for repeated trials to improve accuracy.
The document summarizes an experiment to investigate period doubling bifurcation in a chaotic oscillator circuit. Key findings include:
1) As the amplitude of the input signal increased, the period of the output waveform was observed to double, indicating bifurcation.
2) The Feigenbaum number, relating the amplitude changes at which period doubling occurs, was calculated experimentally to be 3.001V on average, compared to the theoretical value of 4.669V.
3) Limitations in the experiment led to a high percentage uncertainty of 35.72%, indicating the need for repeated trials to improve accuracy.
The document summarizes an experiment to investigate period doubling bifurcation in a chaotic oscillator circuit. Key findings include:
1) As the amplitude of the input signal increased, the period of the output waveform was observed to double, indicating bifurcation.
2) The Feigenbaum number, relating the amplitude changes at which period doubling occurs, was calculated experimentally to be 3.001V on average, compared to the theoretical value of 4.669V.
3) Limitations in the experiment led to a high percentage uncertainty of 35.72%, indicating the need for repeated trials to improve accuracy.
The document summarizes an experiment to investigate period doubling bifurcation in a chaotic oscillator circuit. Key findings include:
1) As the amplitude of the input signal increased, the period of the output waveform was observed to double, indicating bifurcation.
2) The Feigenbaum number, relating the amplitude changes at which period doubling occurs, was calculated experimentally to be 3.001V on average, compared to the theoretical value of 4.669V.
3) Limitations in the experiment led to a high percentage uncertainty of 35.72%, indicating the need for repeated trials to improve accuracy.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4
A10 Lab Report
Nicholas Ng Zhi Cheng
32420277 [email protected] Dr. Syahrin Background/Theory The chaotic oscillator is a circuit where oscillation is produced and chaotic signal being generated. The chaotic behaviour of the oscillator occurs where the amplitude of the input signal at which period doubling happens. Period doubling is a condition that happens when two period of the same trajectory merging and produces double the period of the original orbit. To find the period where the output waveform doubles, we need to obtain input voltages where the output signal bifurcates. Bifurcation is a process when a point at something breaks into two parts. The diagram will show a waveform of period doubling where bifurcation is produced as the amplitude increases. The input voltages corresponding to the period doubling where wave bifurcates can be found by first choosing a frequency corresponding to the maximum output voltage through the resonant circuit. As amplitude increases, it is observed that period doubling is happening. The resonance in terms of chaotic oscillator is an event that occurs in which it responds to a weak signal during the chaotic activities. In general, fractal shows that a geometric object possesses a similar shape to itself on all scales. As it is zoom in or out of the geometrical shape, a pattern where all the shapes look exactly like its actual self can be noticed and this is known as ‘self-similarity’. As we investigate the chaotic oscillator, we can relate fractal as both possesses a complex and similar properties from the waveform. The Feigenbaum number is a constant value that has two mathematical constants in order to express ratios in bifurcation diagram. It is given by the formula: A 2− A 1 δ= A 3− A 2
where A represents the amplitude at which period doubles. This Feigenbaum
number also has an experimental value of 4.669. The Feigenbaum number is estimated as we identify the amplitude where period doubles such that from 1 to 2, 2 to 4 and 4 to 8. Experimental method The experiment is designed as to construct the chaotic oscillator based on the diagram given below. A breadboard is needed along with a diode, an inductor probes and BNC cable. The probes are connected to channel 1 and 2 on the oscilloscope and the sinewave generator. It is then connected to the inductor and diode.
Figure 1: Chaotic Oscillator circuit diagram
The sinewave generator is set with an output of around 180kHz with a peak-to- peak voltage of around 200mV. The frequency is then reduced bit by bit so that it is close to the resonance and obtain the value of amplitude as it increases based on the oscilloscope as period doubling occurs. The bifurcation based on the output waveform will then be recorded. The amplitude and waveform at which the period doubles from 1 to 2, 2 to 4 and 4 to 8 is obtained. The Feigenbaum number is also calculated. Results The maximum output peak to peak voltage obtained across the diode is 556mV while the corresponding frequency is 233.3kHz. When the amplitude, A1 of the input signal is increased to 1.258V, the first period doubling occurs. When the amplitude, A2 is increased to 1.635V, the second period doubling occurs. When the amplitude, A3 is increased to 1.760V, the third period doubling occurs. The Feigenbaum number is then calculated by using the formula: A 2− A 1 1.635 V −1.258 V δ= = =3.016 V A 3− A 2 1.760 V −1.635 V The experiment was repeated for 2 more times and the amplitude for each attempt was recorded. For the second attempt, A1= 1.262V, A2= 1.643V, A3= 1.765V. The Feigenbaum number for second attempt is calculated to be 3.123V. For the third attempt, A1= 1.260V, A2= 1.638V, A3= 1.770V. The Feigenbaum number for third attempt is calculated to be 2.864V. The average value of all 3 Feigenbaum number is calculated to be 3.001V. The theoretical value of the Feigenbaum number is 4.669V and percentage uncertainty is calculated by using the formula: theoretical value−experimental value 4.669−3.001 ×100 % = ×100 % = 35.72% theoretical value 4.669
Period of the actual output waveform:
Period of the output waveform doubling from 1 to 2
Period of the output waveform doubling from 2 to 4
Period of the output waveform doubling from 4 to 8
Discussions The frequency corresponding to the maximum output voltage is 233.3kHz while the maximum peak to peak output voltage is 556mV. The average experimental value of the Feigenbaum number obtained is 3.001V while the theoretical value is 4.669V. The percentage uncertainty calculated is 35.72%. As the percentage uncertainty exceeds 10%, it is proven that the results obtained is not constant and has a lower accuracy. There are several limitations to the experiment and there are also solutions to it. As the output waveform on the oscilloscope was obtained, a sine wave is shown instead of a square wave. In order to work out on the input voltages at which output signal bifurcates which is that the period doubling occurs on the output waveform, a square waveform is needed. This was solved by changing the probes use to connect the oscillator on channel 2 and the sinewave generator. Besides, there is also limitations in which that an accurate result for the peak-to- peak voltage for each bifurcation were unable to be obtained as value shown on the oscilloscope was not constant. The amplitude on each occurrence of period doubling from 1 to 2, 2 to 4, 4 to 8 was also not constant as its bifurcation is different in every attempt. Therefore, in order to obtain a higher accuracy result, 3 attempts of period doubling with different amplitude values were recorded. The Feigenbaum number for each attempt is calculated along with the average values to increase accuracy. However, it is proven to be inconsistent as the percentage uncertainty is still too large. References 1) Dr. Charles Tresser, Period Doubling: Local Period Doubling Bifurcations in a nutshell. Vol. 9, No. 6. New York: Scholarpedia, 2014. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Period_doubling 2) Weisstein, Eric W. , Feigenbaum constant. 1st Ed. Wolfram Mathworld, 1999. https://mathworld.wolfram.com/FeigenbaumConstant.html 3) Alun Vaughan, X3: Experimental design and practice. 2nd Ed. UK: Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, 2013. https://secure.ecs.soton.ac.uk/notes/ellabs/1/x3/x3.pdf 4) Vanderbilt University, Bifurcation diagram. 1st Ed. Nashville: Vanderbilt.edu, University of Vanderbilt, 1873. https://www.vanderbilt.edu/AnS/psychology/cogsci/chaos/workshop/BD. html