IPTV

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
This article is about Internet Protocol Television. For public television broadcasting in Iowa,
see Iowa Public Television.
Internet Protocol television (IPTV) is a system through which Internet television services are
delivered using the architecture and networking methods of the Internet Protocol Suite over a
packet-switched network infrastructure, e.g., the Internet and broadband Internet access
networks, instead of being delivered through traditional radio frequency broadcast, satellite
signal, and cable television (CATV) formats.
IPTV services may be classified into three main groups:
• live television, with or without interactivity related to the current TV show;
• time-shifted programming: catch-up TV (replays a TV show that was broadcast hours or
days ago), start-over TV (replays the current TV show from its beginning);
• video on demand (VOD): browse a catalog of videos, not related to TV programming.
IPTV is distinguished from general Internet-based or web-based multimedia services by its on-
going standardization process (e.g., European Telecommunications Standards Institute) and
preferential deployment scenarios in subscriber-based telecommunications networks with high-
speed access channels into end-user premises via set-top boxes or other customer-premises
equipment.

Contents
[hide]
• 1 Definition
• 2 History
○ 2.1 Future
• 3 Markets
• 4 Discussion of IPTV
• 5 Architecture of IPTV
○ 5.1 Elements
○ 5.2 Architecture of a Video Server Network
○ 5.3 Home Networks for IPTV distribution
○ 5.4 IMS architecture for IPTV
• 6 Protocols
• 7 IPTV via satellite
• 8 Hybrid IPTV
• 9 Advantages
 ○ 9.1 The economics of IPTV
○ 9.2 Interactivity
○ 9.3 Video-on-demand
○ 9.4 IPTV-based converged services
• 10 Limitations
○ 10.1 Latency
• 11 Privacy implications
• 12 Vendors
• 13 Service bundling
• 14 IPTV Regulation
• 15 See also
• 16 References
• 17 External links

[edit] Definition
Historically, many different definitions of IPTV have appeared, including elementary streams
over IP networks, transport streams over IP networks and a number of proprietary systems.
The official definition approved by the International Telecommunication Union focus group on
IPTV (ITU-T FG IPTV) is as follows:
"IPTV is defined as multimedia services such as television/video/audio/text/graphics/data
delivered over IP based networks managed to provide the required level of quality of service and
experience, security, interactivity and reliability." [1]
Another official and more detailed definition of IPTV is the one given by Alliance for
Telecommunications Industry Solutions (ATIS) IPTV Exploratory Group on 2005:
"IPTV is defined as the secure and reliable delivery to subscribers of entertainment video and
related services. These services may include, for example, Live TV, Video On Demand (VOD)
and Interactive TV (iTV). These services are delivered across an access agnostic, packet
switched network that employs the IP protocol to transport the audio, video and control signals.
In contrast to video over the public Internet, with IPTV deployments, network security and
performance are tightly managed to ensure a superior entertainment experience, resulting in a
compelling business environment for content providers, advertisers and customers alike."[2]
One definition for consumer IPTV is for single or multiple program transport streams (MPTS)
which are sourced by the same network operator that owns or directly controls the "last mile" to
the consumer's premises[citation needed]. This control over delivery enables a guaranteed quality of
service (QoS), and also allows the service provider to offer an enhanced user experience such as
better program guide, interactive services etc.
In commercial environments IPTV is widely deployed for distribution of live TV, video playout
channels and Video on Demand (VOD) material across LAN or WAN IP network
infrastructures, with a controlled QoS.
[edit] History
In 1994, ABC's World News Now was the first television show to be broadcast over the Internet,
using the CU-SeeMe videoconferencing software.[3]
The term IPTV first appeared in 1995 with the founding of Precept Software by Judith Estrin and
Bill Carrico. Precept designed and built an Internet video product named IP/TV. IP/TV was an
MBONE compatible Windows and Unix-based application that moved single and multi-source
audio/video traffic, ranging from low to DVD quality, using both unicast and IP multicast Real-
time Transport Protocol (RTP) and Real time control protocol (RTCP). The software was written
primarily by Steve Casner, Karl Auerbach, and Cha Chee Kuan. Precept was acquired by Cisco
Systems in 1998.[4] Cisco retains the IP/TV trademark.
Internet radio company AudioNet started the first continuous live webcasts with content from
WFAA-TV in January, 1998 and KCTU-LP on January 10, 1998.[5]
Kingston Communications, a regional telecommunications operator in UK, launched KIT
(Kingston Interactive Television), an IPTV over DSL broadband interactive TV service in
September 1999 after conducting various TV and VoD trials. The operator added additional VoD
service in October 2001 with Yes TV, a VoD content provider. Kingston was one of the first
companies in the world to introduce IPTV and IP VoD over ADSL. [6] In 2006 the KIT service
was shuttered, subscribers having declined from a peak of 10,000 to 4,000[7]
In 1999, NBTel (now known as Bell Aliant) was the first to commercially deploy Internet
Protocol Television over digital subscriber line (DSL) in Canada[8][9] using the Alcatel 7350
DSLAM and middleware created by iMagic TV (owned by NBTel's parent company
Bruncor[10]). The service was marketed under the brand VibeVision in New Brunswick, and later
expanded into Nova Scotia in early 2000[11] after the formation of Aliant. iMagic TV was later
sold to Alcatel.[12]
In 2002, Sasktel was the second in Canada to commercially deploy Internet Protocol (IP) video
over digital subscriber line (DSL), using the Lucent Stinger(R) DSL platform.[13] In 2006, it was
the first North American company to offer HDTV channels over an IPTV service[14]
In 2003, Total Access Networks Inc launched its IPTV service, comprising 100 free IPTV
stations world wide. The service has been used in over 100 countries world wide, and has
channels in 26 languages.[citation needed]
In 2005, Bredbandsbolaget launched its IPTV service as the first service provider in Sweden. As
of January 2009, they are not the biggest supplier any longer; TeliaSonera who launched their
service later has now more customers.[15]
In 2006, AT&T launched its U-Verse IPTV service in the United States, comprising a national
head end and regional video-serving offices. AT&T offered over 300 channels in 11 cities with
more to be added in 2007 and beyond. In March 2009, AT&T announced that U-verse had
expanded to 100 or more High Definition channels in every U-Verse TV market.[16] While using
IP protocols, AT&T has built a private IP network exclusively for video transport.
In 2010, CenturyLink - after acquiring Embarq (2009) and Qwest (2010), entered five U.S.
markets with an IPTV service called Prism.[17] This was after successful test marketing in
Florida.
[edit] Future
In the past, this technology has been restricted by low broadband penetration and by the
relatively high cost of installing wiring capable of transporting IPTV content reliably in the
customer's home. In the coming years, however, residential IPTV is expected to grow at a brisk
pace as broadband was available to more than 200 million households worldwide in the year
2005, projected to grow to 400 million by the year 2010.[18] Many of the world's major
telecommunications providers are exploring IPTV as a new revenue opportunity from their
existing markets and as a defensive measure against encroachment from more conventional
Cable Television services.
Also, there are a growing number of IPTV installations within schools, universities, corporations
and local institutions.[19]
In December 2009, the FCC began looking into using set-top boxes to make TVs with cable or
similar services into broadband video players. FCC Media Bureau Chief Bill Lake had said
earlier that TV and the Internet would soon be the same, but only 75 percent of homes had
computers, while 99 percent had TV. A Nielsen survey said 99 percent of video viewing was
done on TV.[20]
[edit] Markets

Map of IPTV countries of the world.

Countries where IPTV is available in at least some parts of the country
The number of global IPTV subscribers is expected to grow from 28 million in 2009 to 83
million in 2013. Europe and Asia are the leading territories in terms of the over-all number of
subscribers. But in terms of service revenues, Europe and North America generate a larger share
of global revenue, due to very low average revenue per user (ARPU) in China and India, the
fastest growing (and ultimately, the biggest markets) in Asia. The global IPTV market revenues
are forecasted to grow from US$12 billion in 2009 to US$38 billion in 2013.[21]
While all major western countries and most developed economies have IPTV deployments, the
world's leading markets for IPTV for now are Germany (by Deutsche Telekom) France (led by
Free, then Orange, then Neuf Cegetel; total of over 4 million subscriptions), South Korea (1.8
million subscriptions), United States (by AT&T), Hong Kong, Japan, Italy, Spain, Belgium,
Luxembourg, Austria, China, Singapore, Taiwan, Switzerland and Portugal (with meo, Optimus
Clix and Vodafone Casa).
Services have also launched in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Canada, Croatia, Lithuania, Republic of
Moldova, Macedonia, Montenegro, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovenia,[22] the Netherlands,[23]
Greece, Denmark, Finland, Estonia, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary,[24][25] Norway, Sweden,
Iceland and Turkey. The United Kingdom launched IPTV early and after a slow initial growth, in
February 2009 BT announced that it had reached 398,000 subscribers to its BT Vision service.[26]
Claro has launched their own IPTV service called "Claro TV". This service is available in
several countries in which they operate, such as Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala,
Honduras, Nicaragua. IPTV is just beginning to grow in Central and Eastern Europe and Latin
America, and now it is growing in South Asian countries such as Sri Lanka, Pakistan and
especially India.[27] but significant plans exist in countries such as Russia. Kazakhstan
introduced[28] its own IPTV services by the national provider Kazakhtelecom JSC[29] and content
integrator Alacast under the "iD TV" brand in two major cities Astana and Almaty in 2009 and is
about to go nationwide starting 2010. Australian ISP iiNet launched Australia's first IPTV with
fetchtv.[30]
The first IPTV service to launch on the Chinese mainland sells under the "BesTV" brand and is
currently available in the cities of Shanghai and Harbin.[31] In India IPTV was launched by Airtel
and the government service provider MTNL and BSNL and is available in most of the major
cities of the country . In Pakistan IPTV was launched by PTCL, brand name Smart TV which is
available in most of the major cities of Pakistan.
In Malaysia, various companies have attempted to launch IPTV services since 2005. Failed
PayTV provider MiTV attempted to use a IPTV-over-UHF service but the service failed to take
off. Hypp.TV was supposed to use an IPTV-based system, but is not true IPTV as it does not
provide a set top box and requires users to view channels using a computer. True IPTV providers
available in the country at the moment are Fine TV and DETV. Telekom Malaysia launched
IPTV services through their fiber to the home product UniFi in select areas since Q2 2010.
In Turkey, TTNET launched IPTV services under the name IPtivibu in 2010 and is currently
available in pilot areas in the cities of Istanbul, İzmir and Ankara. As of 2011 IPTV service is
launched as a large scale commercial service and widely available across the country under the
trademark "Tivibu EV"[32][33] Superonline plans to provide IPTV under a different name
"WebTV" in 2011. Türk Telekom had started building the fiber optic substructure for IPTV in
late 2007.
[edit] Discussion of IPTV
A telecommunications company IPTV service is usually delivered over a investment heavy
walled garden network, which is carefully engineered to ensure bandwidth efficient delivery of
vast amounts of multicast video traffic. The higher network quality also enables easy delivery of
high quality SD or HD TV content to subscribers’ homes. This makes IPTV by default the
preferred delivery platform for premium content. However, the investment for a
telecommunications company to build an end-to-end telecommunications company IPTV service
can be substantial.[original research?]
Broadcast IPTV has two major architecture forms: free and fee based. As of June 2006, there are
over 1,300 free IPTV sources available.[34] This sector is growing rapidly and major television
broadcasters worldwide are transmitting their broadcast signal over the Internet. These free IPTV
sources require only an Internet connection and an Internet enabled device such as a personal
computer, HDTV connected to a computer or even a 3G cell/mobile phone to watch the IPTV
content. Various Web portals offer access to these free IPTV sources. Some cite the ad-
sponsored availability of TV series such as Lost as indicators that IPTV will become more
prevalent.
Because IPTV uses standard networking protocols, it promises lower costs for operators and
lower prices for users. Using set-top-boxes with broadband Internet connections, video can be
streamed to households more efficiently than current coaxial cable. Home networks currently use
technology from the Multimedia over Coax Alliance, HomePlug Powerline Alliance or Home
Phoneline Networking Alliance to deliver IPTV content to any set-top-box in a home, without
having to install new Ethernet wires and without relying on wireless technologies like 802.11,
which are not optimized for reliable delivery of video streams. ISPs are upgrading their networks
to bring higher speeds and to allow multiple High Definition TV channels.
IPTV uses a two-way digital broadcast signal sent through a switched telephone or cable network
by way of a broadband connection and a set-top-box programmed with software (much like a
cable or satellite TV box) that can handle viewer requests to access to many available media
sources.
Local IPTV, as used by businesses for audio visual AV distribution on their company networks
is typically based on a mixture of:
1. Conventional TV reception equipment and IPTV encoders
2. IPTV Gateways that take broadcast MPEG channels and IP wrap them to create multicast
streams.
[edit] Architecture of IPTV
[edit] Elements
• TV Head-end: where live TV channels are encoded, encrypted and delivered in the form
of IP multicast streams.
• VOD platform: where on-demand video assets are stored and served when a user makes a
request in the form of IP unicast stream.
• Interactive portal: allows the user to
navigate within the different IPTV IEEE Home networking Recommendations
services, such as the VOD catalog. Recommendations
• delivery network: the packet switched HomePlug AV
network that carries IP packets HomePlug AV2
(unicast and multicast). HomePlug Green PHY
• home gateway: the piece of Recommendations GHz
equipment at the user's home that Wi-Fi 802.11a 5 GHz
terminates the access link from the Wi-Fi 802.11b 2.4 GHz
delivery network. Wi-Fi 802.11g 2.4 GHz
• user's set-top box: the piece of Wi-Fi 802.11n 2.4GHz and/or 5GHz
equipment at the user's home that ITU-T Home networking Recommendations
decodes and decrypt TV and VOD Common Name Recommendations
content and displays it on the TV HomePNA 2.0 G.9951, G.9952, G.9953
screen.
HomePNA 3.0 G.9954 (02/05)
[edit] Architecture of a Video Server HomePNA 3.1 G.9954 (01/07)
Network G.hn/HomeGrid G.9960, G.9961
G.cx G.9972
G.hnta G.9970
Depending on the network architecture of the service provider, there are two main types of video
server architectures that can be considered for IPTV deployment, centralized, and distributed.
The centralized architecture model is a relatively simple and easy to manage solution. For
example, as all contents are stored in centralized servers, it does not require a comprehensive
content distribution system. Centralized architecture is generally good for a network that
provides relatively small VOD service deployment, has adequate core and edge bandwidth and
has an efficient content delivery network (CDN).
Distributed architecture is just as scalable as the centralized model, however it has bandwidth
usage advantages and inherent system management features that are essential for managing a
larger server network. Operators who plan to deploy a relatively large system should therefore
consider implementing a Distributed Architecture model right from the start. Distributed
architecture requires intelligent and sophisticated content distribution technologies to augment
effective delivery of multimedia contents over service provider's network.[35]
[edit] Home Networks for IPTV distribution
In many cases, the Residential Gateway that provides connectivity with the Broadband Access
network is not located in close proximity to the IPTV Set-Top Box. This scenario becomes very
common as service providers start to offer service packages with multiple Set-Top Boxes per
subscriber.
Traditional home networking technologies such as Ethernet and 802.11 do not provide a good
solution to provide connectivity between the Gateway and each Set-Top-Box. Most homes today
are not wired with Ethernet cable in every room, and installing new Ethernet cables is expensive
for service providers and undesirable for consumers. Wireless technologies like 802.11 are
optimized for data transmission, but they usually don't provide the Quality of Service required by
IPTV applications.
Networking technologies that take advantage of existing home wiring (such as power lines,[36][37]
phone lines or coaxial cables[38][39]) have become a popular solution for this problem, although
fragmentation in the wired home networking market has limited somewhat the growth in this
market.[40][41]
On December 2008, ITU-T adopted Recommendation G.hn (also known as G.9960), which is a
next generation home networking standard that specifies a common PHY/MAC that can operate
over any home wiring (power lines, phone lines or coaxial cables).[42]
[edit] IMS architecture for IPTV
There is a growing standardization effort on the use of the 3GPP IP Multimedia Subsystem
(IMS) as an architecture for supporting IPTV services in carriers networks. Both ITU-T and
ETSI are working on so-called "IMS-based IPTV" standards (see e.g. ETSI TS 182 027[43]). The
benefits of this approach are obvious. Carriers will be able to offer both voice and IPTV services
over the same core infrastructure and the implementation of services combining conventional TV
services with telephony features (e.g. caller ID on the TV screen) will become straigthforward.[44]
The MultiService Forum recently conducted interoperability of IMS-based IPTV solutions
during its GMI event in 2008.[45]
[edit] Protocols
IPTV covers both live TV (multicasting) as well as stored video (Video-on-Demand, or VoD).
The playback of IPTV requires either a personal computer or a set-top-box connected to a TV.
Video content is typically compressed using either a MPEG-2 or a MPEG-4 codec and then sent
in an MPEG transport stream delivered via IP Multicast in case of live TV or via IP Unicast in
case of video on demand. IP multicast is a method in which information can be sent to multiple
computers at the same time. H.264 (MPEG-4) codec is increasingly used to replace the older
MPEG-2 codec.
In standards-based IPTV systems, the primary underlying protocols used are:
• Live IPTV uses IGMP version 2 or IGMP version 3 for IPv4 for connecting to a
multicast stream (TV channel) and for changing from one multicast stream to another
(TV channel change). IGMP operates within LAN's or VLAN's so other protocols, such
as Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM), are used to route IPTV multicast streams from
one LAN segment to another.
• VOD uses UDP or RTP protocols for channel streams and control is done using the
control protocol RTSP (Real Time Streaming Protocol).
• NPVR (network personal video recorder), like VOD, uses UDP or RTP for IPTV
streams, and the RTSP control protocol for end-user control communications.
[edit] IPTV via satellite
Although IPTV and conventional satellite TV distribution have been seen as complementary
technologies, they are likely to be increasingly used together in hybrid IPTV networks that
deliver the highest levels of performance and reliability. IPTV is largely neutral to the
transmission medium, and IP traffic is already routinely carried by satellite for Internet backbone
trunking and corporate VSAT networks.[46] The use of satellite to carry IP is fundamental to
overcoming the greatest shortcoming of IPTV over terrestrial cables – the speed/bandwidth of
the connection.
The copper twisted pair cabling that forms the last mile of the telephone/broadband network in
many countries is not able to provide a sizeable proportion of the population with an IPTV
service that matches even existing terrestrial or satellite digital TV distribution. For a competitive
multi-channel TV service, a connection speed of 20Mbit/s is likely to be required, but
unavailable to most potential customers.[47] The increasing popularity of high definition TV (with
twice the data rate of SD video) increases connection speed requirements, or limits IPTV service
quality and connection eligibility even further.
However, satellites are capable of delivering in excess of 100Gbit/s via multi-spot beam
technologies, making satellite a clear emerging technology for implementing IPTV networks.
Satellite distribution can be included in an IPTV network architecture in several ways. Simplest
to implement is an IPTV-DTH architecture, in which hybrid DVB/broadband set-top boxes in
subscriber homes integrate satellite and IP reception to give near-infinite bandwidth with return
channel capabilities. In such a system, many live TV channels may be multicast via satellite (IP-
encapsulated or as conventional DVB digital TV) with stored video-on-demand transmission via
the broadband connection. Arqiva’s Satellite Media Solutions Division suggests “IPTV works
best in a hybrid format. For example, you would use broadband to receive some content and
satellite to receive other, such as live channels”.[48]
[edit] Hybrid IPTV
Hybrid IPTV refers to the combination of traditional broadcast TV services and video delivered
over either managed IP networks or the public Internet. It is an increasing trend in both the
consumer and pay TV [operator] markets[49][50] .[51]
Hybrid IPTV has grown in popularity in recent years as a result of two major drivers. Since the
emergence of online video aggregation sites, like YouTube and Vimeo in the mid-2000s,
traditional pay-TV operators have come under increasing pressure to provide their subscribers
with a means of viewing Internet-based video [both professional and user-generated] on their
TVs. At the same time, specialist IP-based operators [often telecommunications providers] have
looked for ways to offer analogue and digital terrestrial services to their operations, without
adding either additional cost or complexity to their transmission operations. Bandwidth is a
valuable asset for operators, so many have looked for alternative ways to deliver these new
services without investing in additional network infrastructures.
These trends led to the development of Hybrid IPTV Set-Top Boxes that included both a
traditional broadcast tuner and an Internet connection – usually an Ethernet port. The first
commercially available Hybrid IPTV Set-Top Box was developed by Advanced Digital
Broadcast, a developer of digital television hardware and software, in 2005. The platform was
developed for Spanish pay TV operator, Telefonica,[52] and used as part of its Imagenio service,
launched to subscribers at the end of 2005.
A hybrid set-top allows content from a range of sources, including terrestrial broadcast, satellite,
and cable to be brought together with video delivered over the Internet via an Ethernet
connection on the device. This enables television viewers to access a greater variety of content
on their TV sets, without the need for a separate box for each service.
Hybrid IPTV Set-Top Boxes also enable consumers to access a range of advanced interactive
services, such as VOD and catch-up TV, as well as Internet applications, including video
telephony, surveillance, gaming, shopping, e-government accessed via a television set.
From a pay-TV operator’s perspective, a Hybrid IPTV Set-Top Box gives them greater long term
flexibility by enabling them to deploy new services and applications as and when consumers
require, most often without the need to upgrade equipment or for an engineer to visit and
reconfigure or swap out the device. This minimizes the cost of launching new services, increases
speed to market and limits disruption for consumers.[53]
The Hybrid Broadcast Broadband TV (HbbTV) consortium of industry companies is currently
promoting and establishing an open European standard for hybrid set-top boxes for the reception
of broadcast and broadband digital TV and multimedia applications with a single user interface.
[54]

An alternative approach is the IPTV version of the Headend in the Sky cable TV solution. Here,
mutilple TV channels are distributed via satellite to the ISP or IPTV provider’s point of presence
(POP) for IP-encapsulated distribution to individual subscribers as required by each subscriber.
This can provide a huge selection of channels to subscribers without overburdening Internet
trunking to the POP, and enables an IPTV service to be offered to small or remote operators
outside the reach of terrestrial high speed broadband connection. An example is a network
combining fibre and satellite distribution via an SES New Skies satellite of 95 channels to Latin
America and the Caribbean, operated by IPTV Americas.[55]
While the future development of IPTV probably lies with a number of coexisting architectures
and implementations, it’s clear that broadcasting of high bandwidth applications such as IPTV is
accomplished more efficiently and cost-effectively using satellite[56] and it’s predicted that the
majority of global IPTV growth will be fuelled by hybrid networks.[57]
[edit] Advantages
The IP-based platform offers significant advantages, including the ability to integrate television
with other IP-based services like high speed Internet access and VoIP.
A switched IP network also allows for the delivery of significantly more content and
functionality. In a typical TV or satellite network, using broadcast video technology, all the
content constantly flows downstream to each customer, and the customer switches the content at
the set-top box. The customer can select from as many choices as the telecomms, cable or
satellite company can stuff into the “pipe” flowing into the home. A switched IP network works
differently. Content remains in the network, and only the content the customer selects is sent into
the customer’s home. That frees up bandwidth, and the customer’s choice is less restricted by the
size of the “pipe” into the home. This also implies that the customer's privacy could be
compromised to a greater extent than is possible with traditional TV or satellite networks. It may
also provide a means to hack into, or at least disrupt (see Denial of Service) the private network.
[edit] The economics of IPTV
The cable industry's expenditures of approximately $1 Billion per year are based on network
updates to accommodate higher data speeds. Most operators use 2-3 channels to support
maximum data speeds of 50 Mb/s to 100 Mb/s. However, because video streams require a high
bit rate for much longer periods of time, the expenditures to support high amounts of video
traffic will be much greater. This phenomenon is called persistency. Data persistency is routinely
5% while video persistency can easily reach 50%. As video traffic continues to grow, this means
that significantly more CMTS downstream channels will be required to carry this video content.
Based on today's market, it is likely that industry expenditures for CMTS expansion could
exceed $2 Billion a year, virtually all of this expenditure being driven by video traffic. Adoption
of IPTV for carrying the majority of this traffic could save the industry approximately 75% of
this capital expenditure.[58]
[edit] Interactivity
An IP-based platform also allows significant opportunities to make the TV viewing experience
more interactive and personalized. The supplier may, for example, include an interactive
program guide that allows viewers to search for content by title or actor’s name, or a picture-in-
picture functionality that allows them to “channel surf” without leaving the program they’re
watching. Viewers may be able to look up a player’s stats while watching a sports game, or
control the camera angle. They also may be able to access photos or music from their PC on their
television, use a wireless phone to schedule a recording of their favorite show, or even adjust
parental controls so their child can watch a documentary for a school report, while they’re away
from home.
Note that this is all possible, to some degree, with existing digital terrestrial, satellite and cable
networks in tandem with modern set top boxes.[citation needed] In order that there can take place an
interaction between the receiver and the transmitter a feedback channel is needed. Due to this,
terrestrial, satellite, and cable networks for television do not allow interactivity. However,
interactivity with those networks can be possible by combining TV networks with data networks
such as the Internet or a mobile communication network.
[edit] Video-on-demand
IPTV technology is bringing Video-on-demand (VoD) to television[59] which permits a customer
to browse an online program or film catalog, to watch trailers and to then select a selected
recording. The playout of the selected item starts nearly instantaneously on the customer's TV or
PC.
Technically, when the customer selects the movie, a point-to-point unicast connection is set up
between the customer's decoder (Set Top Box or PC) and the delivering streaming server. The
signalling for the trick play functionality (pause, slow-motion, wind/rewind etc.) is assured by
RTSP (Real Time Streaming Protocol).
The most common codecs used for VoD are MPEG-2, MPEG-4 and VC-1.
In an attempt to avoid content piracy, the VoD content is usually encrypted. Whilst encryption of
satellite and cable TV broadcasts is an old practice, with IPTV technology it can effectively be
thought of as a form of Digital Rights Management. A film that is chosen, for example, may be
playable for 24 hours following payment, after which time it becomes unavailable.
[edit] IPTV-based converged services
Another advantage of an IP-based network is the opportunity for integration and convergence.
This opportunity is amplified when using IMS-based solutions.[60] Converged services implies
interaction of existing services in a seamless manner to create new value added services. One
good example is On-Screen Caller ID, getting Caller ID on your TV and the ability to handle it
(send it to voice mail, etc.). IP-based services will help to enable efforts to provide consumers
anytime-anywhere access to content over their televisions, PCs and cell phones, and to integrate
services and content to tie them together. Within businesses and institutions, IPTV eliminates the
need to run a parallel infrastructure to deliver live and stored video services.
[edit] Limitations
IPTV is sensitive to packet loss and delays if the streamed data is unreliable. IPTV has strict
minimum speed requirements in order to facilitate the right number of frames per second to
deliver moving pictures. This means that the limited connection speed/bandwidth available for a
large IPTV customer base can reduce the service quality delivered.
Although a few countries have very high speed broadband-enabled populations, such as South
Korea with 6 million homes benefiting from a minimum connection speed of 100Mbit/s, in other
countries (such as the UK) legacy networks struggle to provide 3-5 Mbit/s[61] and so
simultaneous provision to the home of TV channels, VOIP and Internet access may not be
viable. The last mile delivery for IPTV usually has a bandwidth restriction that only allows a
small number of simultaneous TV channel streams – typically from one to three – to be
delivered.[62]
Streaming IPTV across wireless links within the home has proved troublesome; not due to
bandwidth limitations as many assume, but due to issues with multipath and reflections of the RF
signal carrying the IP data packets. An IPTV stream is sensitive to packets arriving at the right
time and in the right order. Improvements in wireless technology are now starting to provide
equipment to solve the problem.[63]
Due to the limitations of wireless, most IPTV service providers today use wired home
networking technologies instead of wireless technologies like 802.11. Service Providers such as
AT&T (which makes extensive use of wireline home networking as part of its U-Verse IPTV
service) have expressed support for the work done in this direction by ITU-T, which has adopted
Recommendation G.hn (also known as G.9960), which is a next generation home networking
standard that specifies a common PHY/MAC that can operate over any home wiring (power
lines, phone lines or coaxial cables).[64][65]
[edit] Latency
The latency inherent in the use of satellite Internet is often held up as reason why satellites
cannot be successfully used for IPTV, but in practice latency is not an important factor for IPTV.
An IPTV service does not require real-time transmission, as is the case with telephony or
videoconferencing services.
It is the latency of response to requests to change channel, display an EPG, etc. that most affects
customers’ perceived quality of service, and these problems affect satellite IPTV no more than
terrestrial IPTV. Indeed, command latency problems, faced by terrestrial IPTV networks with
insufficient bandwidth as their customer base grows, may be solved by the high capacity of
satellite distribution.
Satellite distribution does suffer from latency – the time for the signal to travel up from the hub
to the satellite and back down to the user is around 0.25 seconds, and cannot be reduced.
However, the effects of this delay are mitigated in real-life systems using data compression,
TCP-acceleration, and HTTP pre-fetching.[66]
Satellite latency can be detrimental to especially time-sensitive applications such as on-line
gaming (although it only seriously affects the likes of first-person shooters while many MMOGs
can operate well over satellite Internet[67]), but IPTV is typically a simplex operation (one-way
transmission) and latency is not a critical factor for video transmission.
Existing video transmission systems of both analogue and digital formats already introduce
known quantifiable delays. Indeed, existing DVB TV channels that simulcast by both terrestrial
and satellite transmissions, experience the same 0.25s delay difference between the two services
with no detrimental effect, and it goes unnoticed by viewers.
[edit] Privacy implications
Due to limitations in bandwidth, an IPTV channel is delivered to the user one at a time, as
opposed to the traditional multiplexed delivery. Changing a channel requires requesting the
head-end server to provide a different broadcast stream, much like VOD (For VOD the stream is
delivered using Unicast, for the normal TV signal Multicast is used). This could enable the
service provider to accurately track each and every programme watched and the duration of
watching for each viewer, broadcasters and advertisers could then understand their audience and
programming better with accurate data and targeted advertising.[68]
[edit] Vendors
A small number of companies supply most current IPTV systems. Some, such as Imagenio, were
formed by telecoms operators themselves, to minimise external costs, a tactic also used by
PCCW of Hong Kong. Some major telecoms vendors are also active in this space, notably
Alcatel-Lucent (sometimes working with Imagenio), Ericsson (notably since acquiring Tandberg
Television), NEC, Nokia Siemens Networks, Thomson, Huawei, and ZTE, as are some IT
houses, led by Microsoft. California-based UTStarcom, Inc., Tennessee-based Worley
Consulting, Tokyo-based The New Media Group, Malaysian-based Select-TV and Oslo/Norway-
based SnapTV also offer end-to-end networking infrastructure for IPTV-based services, and
Hong Kong-based BNS Ltd. provides turnkey open platform IPTV technology solutions. Global
sales of IPTV systems exceeded 2 billion USD in 2007.
Many of these IPTV solution vendors participated in the biennial Global MSF Interoperability
2008 (GMI) event which was coordinated by the MultiService Forum (MSF) at five sites
worldwide from 20- to 31-October 2008. Test equipment vendors including Absilion,
Codenomicon, Empirix, Ixia, Mu Dynamics and Spirent joined solution vendors such as the
companies listed above in one of the largest IPTV proving grounds ever deployed.
[edit] Service bundling
For residential users, IPTV is often provided in conjunction with Video on Demand and may be
bundled with Internet services such as Internet access and Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP)
telecommunications services. Commercial bundling of IPTV, VoIP and Internet access is
sometimes referred to in marketing as triple play service. When these three are offered with
cellular service, the combined service may be referred to as quadruple play.
[edit] IPTV Regulation
Historically, broadcast television has been regulated differently than telecommunications. As
IPTV allows TV and VoD to be transmitted over IP networks new regulatory issues arise.[69]
Professor Eli M. Noam highlights in his report "TV or Not TV: Three Screens, One Regulation?"
some of the key challenges with sector specific regulation that is becoming obsolete due to
convergence in this field.[70]
[edit] See also
• Comparison of streaming media systems
• Comparison of video services
• Content delivery network
• Grid casting
• Internet television
• List of music streaming services
• List of streaming media systems
• Multicast
• P2PTV
• Protection of Broadcasts and Broadcasting Organizations Treaty
• Software as a service
• Streaming media
• Webcast
• Web television
[edit] References
1. ^ ITU-T Newslog, 2006
2. ^ [1]
3. ^ What is IP television?
4. ^ Cisco - Summary of Acquisitions
5. ^ Hart, Timothy (February 15, 1998). "KCTU-TV earns a place in television, Internet history".
http://wichita.bizjournals.com/wichita/stories/1998/02/16/focus1.html.
6. ^ History of IPTV
7. ^ [2]
8. ^ NBTel Unveils Interactive TV
9. ^ NBTel leading the way in North America with Aliant's new interactive information and entertainment
television service - VibeVision
10. ^ Bruncor launches iMagic TV
11. ^ Aliant Telecom Launches New Television Technology in Halifax
12. ^ "Alcatel Acquires iMagic TV". Communications Today. 2003.
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0BMD/is_26_9/ai_97423693/.
13. ^ "Lucent Technologies Introduces First Commercial IP Video Over DSL Solution, Business Net".
Business Wire. April 10, 2002.
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_2002_April_10/ai_84632001. Retrieved 2008-02-04.
14. ^ "Internet HDTV unveiled, Regina Leader-Post".
http://www.canada.com/reginaleaderpost/news/business_agriculture/story.html?id=ebc83348-ad20-4c37-
817d-308a6df69cce. Retrieved 2006-11-15.
15. ^ (Sami)"Bredbandsbolaget is mobilizing for IP TV"
16. ^ AT&T U-verse TV Lineup Expands to 100 or More High Definition Channels in Every U-Verse TV
Market
17. ^ http://www.telecompetitor.com/centurylink-quietly-launches-prism-iptv-product/
18. ^ Gartner - 2007 Press releases
19. ^ Internet TV: Communicating in the 21st Century
20. ^ Eggerton, John (2009-12-14). "Broadcasters Squeezed by Convergence Push". Broadcasting & Cable.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/439909-Broadcasters_Squeezed_by_Convergence_Push.php?
rssid=20068&q=digital+tv. Retrieved 2009-12-17.
21. ^ IPTV Global Forecast (2008-2013) International Television Expert Group
22. ^ BHtelecom.ca
23. ^ KPN.com
24. ^ T-Home.hu
25. ^ InviTV.hu
26. ^ BT Vision passes 398k subs in 4Q08
27. ^ "Salad days," Chris Dziadul, Broadband TV News, May 2, 2008
28. ^ Delivering IPTV System to Kazakhtelecom Article from the IPTV industrial portal
29. ^ iD TV services for broadband subscribers in Kazakhstan Kazakhtelecom JSC - iD TV service for Home
users
30. ^ iiNet's Age of Terabyte PDF from iiNet press release 18.8.2010
31. ^ "BabyFirst launches on BesTV in China," Indiantelevision.com Team, May 2, 2008.
32. ^ "Turkey's iptv, Tivibu Ev is on air" ntvmsnbc.com, Feb 23, 2011.
33. ^ "Tivibu Ev's Official Homepage" tivibu.com/ev, Mar 13, 2011.
34. ^ IPTV - Another Viewing Choice!
35. ^ Distributed Architecture vsCentralized Architecture for IP VoD, Annual Review of Communications,
Vol. 58
36. ^ HomePlug Alliance keeps plugging away
37. ^ IPTV distribution using DS2 powerline networks
38. ^ "20 Million MoCA Nodes Have Been Shipped". Reuters. February 17, 2009.
http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS171465+17-Feb-2009+GNW20090217.
39. ^ LightReading: Why AT&T Likes HomePNA
40. ^ Could MoCA/HomePlug win in-home networking wars?
41. ^ HomeGrid Forum Blog - Why do we need a unified standard at all?
42. ^ New global standard for fully networked home, ITU-T Press Release
43. ^ ETSI TS 182 027
44. ^ IMS-based IPTV services - architecture and implementation
45. ^ MSforum.org
46. ^ Berlocher, Greg and Freyer, Dan. "IP And Satellite: Communications Worlds Merging" Via Satellite
January 2009 p24-28
47. ^ Taga, Karim. "Hybrid delivery of content for IPTV" InterComms Issue 11 August 2008 p13-14
48. ^ Holmes, Mark. "Broadcast 2.0: The Changing Scene In Europe" Via Satellite September 2008 p20-25
49. ^ http://www.broadbandtvnews.com/2009/10/14/uk-and-france-lead-with-hybrid-iptv-set-tops/
50. ^ http://www.mrgco.com/press_releases.html#hstb09
51. ^ http://jviptv.wordpress.com/2009/06/25/hybrid-iptv-stb/
52. ^ http://www.digitaltvnews.net/items/060911adb_spain.htm
53. ^ http://www.v-net.tv/Webcast.aspx?id=5
54. ^ HbbTV Consortium (August 27, 2009). "New European initiative merges television with the power of the
Internet". Press release. http://www.hbbtv.org/news/HBBTV_PR_Final.pdf.
55. ^ IPTV Americas (January 13, 2009). "IPTV Americas Launches First IPTV Satellite Distribution Platform
for Latin America and The Caribbean via SES NEW SKIES’ NSS-806". Press release. http://www.iptv-
americas.tv/releaseDB.php?leng=&notID=47.
56. ^ International Datacasting Corporation "Why IP Over Satellite?". Accessed January 18, 2009. Company
factsheet
57. ^ "Future Looks Bright For IPTV" Satellite Today'.' Retrieved January 18, 2009.
58. ^ The Economics of IPTV
59. ^ Broadband Users Control What They Watch and When
60. ^ Session and Media SIgnalling for IPTV via IMS
61. ^ Bulkley, Kate. "IPTV’s Eastern Promise" Digital TV Europe October 2008 p48
62. ^ Brown, Peter J. "Super Headends And High Expectations" Via Satellite April 2006 p18-30
63. ^ Market Wire "ZyXEL Announces Industry's First ADSL2/2+ 802.11n Gateway and New IPTV Product
Offerings" June 2008
64. ^ HomePNA and HomeGrid Sign Liaison Agreement, Groups Work to Promote New ITU G.hn Global
Wired Home Networking Standard
 65. ^ AT&T Participating in G.hn Standard Development
66. ^ Newtec Productions NV "TP200 Sat3Play Broadband Terminal" (Version R2/01.2008). Satellite Internet
Modem factsheet
67. ^ Tom’s Hardware "How much latency is too much for Online Gaming?". Accessed January 23, 2009.
Internet Forum
68. ^ IPTV privacy risks
69. ^ Ericson report on need for regulationPDF (217 KB)
70. ^ TV or Not TV
• Securing Converged IP Networks, Tyson Macaulay, Auerbach 2006 (ISBN 0-8493-7580-
0)
• "Does Video Delivered Over A Telephone Network Require A Cable Franchise?" AEI-
Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies
[edit] External links
• ITU IPTV Focus Group
• Ars Technica: An Introduction to IPTV
• IPTV over IMS
• Internet-connected TVs finally arrive
[show]v · d · eCable, satellite and other specialty television providers

C Asianet Cable Vision · Adams Cable · Adelphia · Airtel Digital Tv · Armstrong Telephone
a Company · Atlantic Broadband · Austar · Bright House Networks · Buckeye CableSystem ·
b Cablelink · CableOne · Cable TV Hong Kong · Cable TV Wakasa Obama (Japan) ·
l Cablevision (U.S.) · Cablevision (Canada) · Canal Digital · Champion Broadband ·
e Charter · Cogeco · Columbus Communications · Comcast · Com Hem · Cox · DartyBox ·
Digicable · EastLink · EMBARQ · ER-Telecom (Russia) · Fastweb (Italy) · First Media ·
t Foxtel · GCI · Global Destiny · Globosat · GUdTV (Guam) · Hathway · Hot · IndosatM2 ·
e Insight · Kabel Deutschland · Knology · Kujtesa · MASTV · MC Cable · MCV Broadband ·
l Mediacom · MetroCast Cablevision · Midcontinent Communications · Millennium Digital
e Media · Neighbourhood Cable · Net Brasil · Ono · Optus · Persona · Qwest Choice TV ·
v RCS&RDS · RCN · Rogers · Satview Broadband Ltd · Service Electric · SkyCable · Shaw ·
i Smallworld · StarHub TV · Suddenlink · TDC · Tele2 · Tele Columbus (Germany) · Telenet
s (Belgium) · TelkomVision · TelstraClear InHomeTV · Time Warner · TransACT ·
i TrueVisions · Teledünya · TV Cabo · TVTEL · UCS · UPC Ireland · UPC Netherlands ·
o UPC Romania · Uralsvyazinform (Russia) · Vidéotron · Virgin Media · WOW! ·
n WightCable · Ziggo ·

S AB Sat · Airtel Digital Tv · AlphaStar · Arab Digital Distribution · ART · Astro · Astro
a Nusantara · Austar · Bell TV · BIG TV · Boom TV · CanalDigitaal · Canal Digital ·
t CanalSat · CanalSat Calédonie · CanalSat Caraïbes · CanalSat Horizon · CanalSat
e Reunion · CaspioNet · Cignal · CS Link · Cyfra+ · D-smart · DD Direct Plus · DialogTV ·
l Digi TV · Digit-Alb · Digital+ · Digiturk · DirecTV · Dish Network · Dish TV · DishHD ·
l Dolce · Dream · DStv · Euro1080 · Focus Sat · Foxtel · Freesat · Freesat from Sky ·
i Freeview (NZ) · GlobeCast World TV · Globosat · Glorystar · G-Sat · HiTV · Home2US ·
t
e

t Indovision · Kristal-Astro · Magio Sat · Max TV · MBC (Middle East) · N (Poland) ·

e NOVA Cyprus · NOVA Greece · NTV Plus · OTAU TV · Sky Deutschland · Orbit
l Showtime Network · PrimeStar · SelecTV · Shaw Direct · Sky · SKY Italia · Sky Latin
e America · Skylink · SkyLife · SKY PerfecTV! · SKY TV (NZ) · STAR Select · STAR TV ·
v Sun Direct DTH · Tata Sky · Tivù Sat · TPS · Telekom Srbija · TelkomVision ·
i TrueVisions · TV Cabo · TV Vlaanderen Digitaal · TVTEL · UBI World TV · USSB ·
s Viasat · Viasat Ukraine · Voom · WOWOW · Yes
i
o
n

Alice Home TV (Italy) · Beeline (Russia) · Belgacom · BSNL · Bell Aliant TV · Blink
Entertainment · BT Vision · Canal Digital · Clix · Crnogorski Telekom · DartyBox ·
Deutsche Telekom (T-Home) · Elioni DTV (Estonia) · Fastweb (Italy) · Fetch TV · Fine
I TV · Free · Freewire TV · hanaTV (Korea) · Hypp.TV · iD TV · Imagenio · iNES ·
P Infostrada TV (Italy) · KPN · La Télé des P&T (Luxembourg) · Maroc Telecom TV
T (Morocco) · mio TV · MTNL · Neuf · now TV · Orange · Portugal Telecom (Meo) · PTCL
V Smart TV (Pakistan) · Sky Angel · ShqipTV · T-com Hrvatska · T-Home Macedonia ·
TalkTalk TV · Tele2 · Telefónica · Telekom Srbija · Telekomunikacja Polska ·
TeliaSonera · Telus TV · Tiscali TV (Italy) · TPG IPTV · TrueIPTV (Thailand) ·
TVCatchup · U-verse · UniFi · VDC · Viasat · DETV

T
e
r
r
e
s
t
r
i Boxer (Sweden) · Cablevision (Lebanon) · Doordarshan · Freeview (Australia) · Freeview
a (NZ) · Freeview (UK) · Kazteleradio · KPN (Netherlands) · La 7 Cartapiù (Italy) · Mediaset
l Premium (Italy) · MiTV · Multi-Choice TV (Barbados) · Pakistan Television Corporation ·
PlusTV (Finland) · RiksTV (Norway) · Saorview (Ireland) · Sky Picnic · Télévision
t Numérique Terrestre (France) · Top Up TV · Televisão Digital Terrestre (Portugal) ·
e Televisió Digital Terrestre (Andorra)
l
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
 F
i
b
e
r
- TVTEL · Verizon FiOS · AT&T · meo fibra
O
p
t
i
c
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPTV"
Categories: Digital television | Film and video technology | Internet broadcasting | Internet
television | Video on demand services
Hidden categories: All articles with unsourced statements | Articles with unsourced statements
from April 2008 | Articles with unsourced statements from June 2009 | All articles that may
contain original research | Articles that may contain original research from July 2009 | Articles
with unsourced statements from January 2009
Personal tools
• Log in / create account
Namespaces
• Article
• Discussion
Variants
Views
• Read
• Edit
• View history
Actions
Search
Top of Form
Special:Search

Search

Bottom of Form
Navigation
• Main page
• Contents
• Featured content
• Current events
• Random article
 • Donate to Wikipedia
Interaction
• Help
• About Wikipedia
• Community portal
• Recent changes
• Contact Wikipedia
Toolbox
• What links here
• Related changes
• Upload file
• Special pages
• Permanent link
• Cite this page
Print/export
• Create a book
• Download as PDF
• Printable version
Languages
• Afrikaans
• ‫العربية‬
• Català
• Česky
• Dansk
• Deutsch
• Eesti
• Español
• Esperanto
• Euskara
• ‫فارسی‬
• Français
• Galego
• 한국어
• िहनदी
• Bahasa Indonesia
• Italiano
• ‫עברית‬
• ქართული
• Қазақша
• Latviešu
• Lietuvių
• Magyar
• Македонски
• മലയാളം
• Bahasa Melayu
• Nederlands
• 日本語
• Norsk (bokmål)
• Polski
• Português
• Română
• Русский
• Shqip
• Српски / Srpski
• Suomi
• Svenska
• ไทย
• Українська
• Tiếng Việt
• 中文
• This page was last modified on 17 March 2011 at 10:26.
• Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License;
additional terms may apply. See Terms of Use for details.
Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit
organization.
• Contact us