No 3 Tao Is Each
No 3 Tao Is Each
No 3 Tao Is Each
Tab 3 Competitiveness
Tab 4 Innovation
Tab 9 Housing
Summary
The macroeconomic challenges facing the economy as a result of the high
fiscal deficit, rapidly increased level of debt, fall in output and entry into
IMF\EU programme are well-known. Major challenges in the immediate
period ahead include:
Priority Issues
The IMF\EU Programme and Budget 2010 are based on the following:
These issues are the responsibility of the Department of Finance, but the
Economic policy Division provides briefing\speaking material as
required, including on (i) significant statistical or economic
releases\reports and (ii) weekly summary of economic news.
2. Jobs / Enterprise
Summary
Given the challenge of reducing unemployment from its current level of
13.5%, the priority is a coherent approach across Government
Departments to creating and protecting jobs and supporting enterprise by
ensuring that:
Priority Issues
A range of job creation and enterprise strategies which require
implementation across Departments\Agencies:
Summary
While Ireland has regained competitiveness in the past two years,
significant further improvements are required to support export-led
growth.
Priority Issues
The Irish economy experienced substantial losses in price and labour cost
competitiveness during the past decade due to rising prices and
production costs relative to our trading partners, an appreciation of the
effective exchange rate and weaker productivity growth.
The price level has fallen relative to our EU competitors: during 2009 and
2010 HICP inflation was -3.3% in Ireland, 5% below the euro zone
average and over 6% below the average for the EU as a whole.
Summary
Despite our ambitions in this area, and recent progess, Ireland remains an
‘innovation-follower’ ranked 9th out of 27 on the EU’s Innovation
Socrecard.
Priority Issues
Investment under the Strategy for Science, Technology and Innovation
(2006) has delivered significant results:
● Total Expenditure on Research and Development has risen from
€972 million in 1998 to €2.68 billion in 2009
● Business Expenditure on R&D (BERD) rose to €1.7 billion in 2009
(from €900m in 2001)
● Higher Education R&D investment has almost quadrupled in
current terms over 10 years and is now at the EU and OECD
average levels
● In 2008 EI assisted 794 companies to perform R&D.
● EI commercialisation activity in 2009 facilitated:
- the creation of 35 spin out companies (up from 5 in 2005)
- 421 invention disclosures (up from 135 in 2005)
- 144 priority patent applications
- 95 licenses/options/assignments
● 49% of IDA investments in 2009 were in RD&I with approx.
€500m of investment. Currently there are about 170 IDA supported
companies with a significant R&D mandate with a combined spend
of approx €1.7 billion.
The Innovation Taskforce recommended how to increase the impact of this
investment based on the concept of making Ireland a ‘Global Innovation
Hub’. Recommendations which should be focus of efforts in short-term
include:
So far NPRF have made 3 commercial investments under the Fund with
leading international venture capital companies:
● DFJ Esprit has opened an international office in Dublin with a
Dublin-based partner.
● DFJ (parent company) - which is based in Silicon Valley – has
agreed to work with the IDA to help bring fast-growing venture
backed companies to Ireland
● Polaris Venture Partners has chosen Dublin as the location for its
first Dogpatch Labs business accelerator facility outside the United
States. This is a coup for Ireland and should help bring people
from across Europe to start their companies in Dublin.
Context
The latest Live Register figures for February 2011 show a standardised
unemployment rate of 13.5%,. The Department of Social Protection
expect that if recent trends continue the Live Register could be lower on
average in 2011 than it was in 2010.
The long-term unemployment rate was 6.5% compared with 3.2% in the
third quarter of 2009 (140,400 people; QNHS figures). As of Q3 2010,
long-term unemployment accounted for almost 47.0% of total
unemployment compared with 25.5% a year earlier. Long-term
unemployment constitutes a larger proportion of total unemployment
among males than females (52.5% compared with 35.6%)
Key issues
2. Departmental Restructuring
Implementation of the Government decision in 2010 restructuring
responsibility for labour market issues continues. Additional
functions transferred to the Department of Social Protection are as
follows:
● The Community Services programme and Rural Social Scheme
previously managed by the Department of Community, Equality
and Gaeltacht Affairs transferred on 1 September 2010
● The staff of the Community Welfare Service have now been
seconded from 1 January 2011 to the Department from the HSE.
It is intended to complete the transfer by end September 2011.
● From 1 January 2011 policy and funding responsibility for FÁS
functions in relation to Employment and Community Services
transferred to the Department. A Framework Agreement is in
place to govern the provision of services by FÁS on behalf of
the Department from 1st January 2011 until such time as
operational responsibility is transferred to the Department.
● The next phase in the transfer of FÁS functions is to transfer the
relevant staff and facilities from FÁS in order to allow the
Department to take direct operational control of employment
and community services. An inter-departmental Programme
Board chaired by the Secretary General of the Department has
been established for the purpose of implementing this transfer.
Implementation
Summary
Ireland is required to submit a National Reform Programme (NRP) under
the Europe 2020 Strategy to the European Commission in April as part of
the new ‘European Semester’. (An initial draft was submitted in
December).
Priority Issues
Before submitting the National Reform Programme in April, Ireland will
need to finalise targets for 2020 in the following areas:
Background
The June 2010 the European Council adopted Europe 2020 as the new
strategy for jobs and for sustainable and inclusive growth –replacing the
Lisbon Strategy. The overall framework covers a number of elements:
● outline of macro-economic scenarios and bottlenecks;
● five EU headline targets in the areas of employment, R&D,
climate change, education and poverty;
● the setting by Member States of national targets in pursuit of
those EU-wide targets;
● at EU level, seven flagship initiatives in key areas which will
contribute to the overall effort by the Member States;
● the preparation of a National Reform Programme by each
Member State, outlining the policies and measures to be taken
in pursuit of the objectives of the strategy, including the
headline targets
Over the last two years, Ireland’s international reputation has been
significantly damaged as a result of the fiscal and banking crisis. The
quantity of sustained, negative international media commentary covering
such a broad global geographic spread is in many ways unprecedented.
Feedback from our missions abroad, overseas offices of agencies and the
internationally trading business community indicates that there could be
further damage to FDI, export markets and tourism if this negative
coverage continues unchallenged.
While there will be some costs associated with implementing this strategy
it should be noted that industry and Government experts suggest that the
cost of doing nothing to challenge Ireland’s current negative image is
likely to be a significant multiple of this and could include a loss of FDI
opportunities, damage to the credibility of our indigenous companies and
continued decline in our tourism industry.
The detailed Report will be available for consideration by Government
shortly.
8. Climate Change
Summary
Ireland faces challenging EU targets for reducing Greenhouse Gas
emissions and increasing renewable energy output by 2020. Even more
ambitious reductions will be required in the longer term, posing a
particular problem for the agriculture sector.
Context
For the purposes of the Kyoto Protocol, Ireland is committed under EU
law to limit the growth in national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to
13% above 1990 levels in the five-year commitment period of 2008-
2012.
Latest projections suggest that Ireland will meet its Kyoto target on the
basis set out in the National Climate Change Strategy 2007-2012,
reflecting both the impact of policy initiatives implemented and in more
recent times the impact of the economic crisis.
EU Obligations (2013-2020)
Beyond the Kyoto Protocol commitment period (2008-2012), Ireland has
a number of distinct and legally-binding obligations under the EU
Climate and Energy package agreed in December 2008. These relate to
(i) the Emissions Trading Scheme (ii) Effort-sharing by member states in
relation to GHG emissions not covered by the Emissions Trading
Scheme; (iii) Renewable Energy.
This target must be achieved on foot of domestic actions and the use of
the flexibilities provided for in the decision. The relative size of our
transport and agriculture sectors (approx. 69% of total non-ETS
emissions) means that our binding emission reduction target of 20% by
2020 is very challenging.
The latest draft emissions projections show that Ireland will not reach its
2020 non-ETS emissions reduction targets without an appropriate mix of
additional policy measures and/or use of carbon credits. While the
headline target relates to 2020, it is important to note that Ireland will
have an individual target in each year from 2013 to 2020, i.e. emission
reductions must follow a strict trajectory.
Priority Issues
This will require development and assessment of policy options (in the
areas of transport, agriculture, waste, commercial, low carbon-intensity
industry and residential) for meeting our 2020 target, to allow for
decisions based on the cost\benefits of each option, including the option
of using international carbon credits.
Scientific evidence suggests that there is only limited scope for increasing
carbon efficiency given the extensive, grass-based nature of Irish
agriculture. There is a strong case that reductions in Irish agricultural
output would be replaced by increased production in South America and
elsewhere with higher levels of carbon-intensity.
Summary
Challenges arising from the collapse of the housing market include:
● current level of mortgage arrears and economic\social impacts
● responding to the problem of so-called ‘Ghost Estates’
● stimulating activity in the construction sector
Priority Issues
Housing completions have collapsed a high of over 93,000 in 2006 to
estimated 14,600 in 2010. The ESRI is forecasting a further fall to
10,000 in 2011 and the same again in 2012.
Latest data from the Financial Regulator shows that in Q4 2010 nearly
80,000 mortgages were either 90 days in arrears or have been
restrucrured.
The Expert Group on Mortgage Arrears issued its final report last
November. Its main recommendations included:
- a Deferred Interest Scheme for borrowers who can pay at least 66% of
the interest. This would give borrowers up to 5 years to get back on their
feet. Lenders representing more than half of the market agreed to take
part in a scheme along the lines of the Group proposal;
The Group did not recommend debt forgiveness, nor a State funded
Mortgage to rent scheme.
Summary
The Central Statistics Office (CSO) is a statutory independent
organisation under the Department of the Taoiseach. Day-to-day political
responsibility (primarily PQs) is normally delegated to the Chief Whip
and Minister of State.
The main challenge facing the CSO is delviering and improving its
services, including the 2011 Census, given resource constraints.
Priority Issues
The most significant issue facing the CSO at the moment is preparations
for the Census of Population which will take place on Sunday, 10 April,
2011. Launch of the Census is planned for 10 March and will involve an
extensive promotional campaign to encourage returns. A separate
briefing note on the Census is provided at Appendix XX.
Background
The CSO performs its functions in accordance with the Statistics Act
1993 which provides that the Director General has sole responsibility for
and be independent in the exercise of the functions of deciding:
a. the statistical methodology and professional statistical
standards used by the Office;
b. the content of statistical releases and publications issued by
the office; and
c. the timing and methods of dissemination of statistics
compiled by the Office.
The Minister is also responsible under Section 19 of the Act for reaching
agreement with the National Statistics Board (NSB) on guiding the
strategic direction of the CSO.