Journal of International Women's Studies

Volume 11 | Issue 4 Article 5

May-2010

Gender Analysis of Women in the Philippine

Agriculture and Their Occupational Issues
Jinky Leilanie Lu

Follow this and additional works at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws

Part of the Women's Studies Commons

Recommended Citation
Lu, Jinky Leilanie (2010). Gender Analysis of Women in the Philippine Agriculture and Their Occupational Issues. Journal of
International Women's Studies, 11(4), 73-82.
Available at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol11/iss4/5

This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts.
 This journal and its contents may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or
systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form
to anyone is expressly forbidden. ©2010 Journal of International Women’s Studies.

Gender Analysis of Women in the Philippine Agriculture and Their

Occupational Issues

By Jinky Leilanie Lu 1

Abstract
Feminist research shows how gender, in interaction with other socioeconomic
differentiation theories on class and ethnicity, influences agrarian transition, health
patterns, and economic development. In the highland community where this study was
conducted, women play a very important role in the production of vegetables and crops.
At the same time, there are hazards facing these women predisposing them to certain
occupational health issues. As such, this research study aimed to look into occupational
issues of women, as well as certain cultural, political, socio- economic perceptions and
attributes that affect women’s occupational issues. 251 women farmers from identified
communities using cluster sampling were included in this study for the survey
questionnaire.. The data collection tools were structured personal interview, key
informant interview, and secondary data gathering. 59% of the women said that farming
was family-based. 28.3% had children under 18 years old involved in farming. The most
commonly used pesticide was manzeb, a carbamate, for a duration of 20 years. 59.4%
reported that sickness was perceived to be due to occupational exposure to pesticides
during application in the field. In the FGDs cultural, political, and socio-economic
factors that affect their occupational and health issues were looked into. This study aimed
to target women in agriculture and their occupational issues to influence local and
national policies concerning them.

Keywords: gender analysis in agriculture, women farmers, feminization of agriculture,

pesticide exposure, socio-political factors in gender differentiation, Philippino women

Introduction
The study was conducted in Benguet which is located in northern Philippines, and
has the highest altitude for a landbased population. The area is considered as the “salad
bowl of the Philippines” because of its high commercial production of vegetables.
Farming in Benguet is family-based, and many women are engaged in farming (FPA,
2001). This study dealt with women farmers who have grown up in the area, and whose
farms were previously owned by their parents or grandparents.
Aside from socioeconomic and cultural factors in the agricultural sector that
disadvantage women compared to men, there are also physical factors that predispose the
former to greater health and safety risks. The reproductive function of women is affected
by farming activities and by chemicals used. Differences in size and stature, as well as
relative low oxygen uptake may also predispose women to certain injuries and illnesses
(McCoy, et.al., 2002).

1
Research Professor 1, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines Manila Manila,
Philippines, [email protected]

Journal of International Women’s Studies Vol. 11 #4 May 2010 73

Context of the study
This study was conducted in the context of having much gender bias in
occupational epidemiology in agriculture. Very few researches focus on women farmers
in the Philippines. Besides, even in terms of occupational and environmental health
exposures, the chronic disabling effects of agricultural work and pesticide exposure have
been given less attention compared to acute immediate effects. Thus, leaving women’s
occupational and environmental issues left unaddressed. If occupational and
environmental epidemiology is to have a meaningful impact on health of women farmers
in developing countries, it must be gender sensitive. In the area of investigation, women
actively participate in farming and agricultural work. In a study by Lu in 2007, women
were equally involved in agriculture as their male counterparts.
It is not only in Benguet, Philippines that we see the pattern of women’s
involvement in agriculture. In a study in Kampal City, Africa, women were reported to
more likely grow food crops on contaminated land, which makes them more vulnerable
to health risks associated with improper management of agriculture. In another study,
women take on more work during the entire agricultural work compared to the men
farmers (Nabulo, et.al., 2005).

The feminization of agriculture

Feminist research influences agrarian transition, health patterns, and economic
development (Preibisch, 2002). Farming is family-based which involves many members
of the household including women and children. The role of women in agriculture in this
study area was not merely complementary to that of men, or a provision of support
system. The work of women farmers are the same as their male counterpart ranging from
pesticide application, clearing the land, fertilizer application, to harvesting and trading.
Similarly, in the study of Ilcan in 1994, women in Turkey perform labor-intensive
operations of ploughing, hoeing, planting, weeding, and caring for and feeding animals as
well as harvesting of wheat and corn.
The significant contribution of women to farming has also been noted in the study
of McCoy, et.al. in 2002, wherein women do not only participate in the traditional roles,
they also work with their husbands in farming. In fact, they observed that more
daughters are entering the farming business as partners with other family members or as
independent operators. In the United States, statistics show the percentage of women
engaged in agriculture has increased, and women's participation in agriculture is
increasing faster than in other business segments. These farm operations predispose
women to health hazards that result in illness, injury or even death (Meeker, et.al., 2002).

Women are at risk

Health problems due to pesticide exposure specifically in women is one of
today’s main inquiry in the agricultural sector. Women generally are more predisposed to
accumulating endocrine-disrupting chemicals and/or facing greater exposures related to
changes in body-fat levels and increased levels of hormonally sensitive tissues (Ribas-
Fito, 2006). Based on the study done by Rao, et.al. in 2007, pesticide exposure has been
linked with a wide range of chronic health effects, immediate and delayed. Pesticides
directly or indirectly affect the reproductive system of women manifesting in

Journal of International Women’s Studies Vol. 11 #4 May 2010 74

abnormalities in fertility (ability to produce offspring) , pregnancy outcome (abortion or
arrested childbirth), reproductive cycle normality (menstrual cycles) and hormone
production (Arbuckle, et.al., 1998).
Several studies have been documented on adverse effects of pesticides on women.
In a study, 28% of those who were highly exposed to pesticides had pregnancies
preceded by medical consultations because of fertility problems compared with only 8%
in individuals with low exposure (de Cock, et.al., 1995). Pesticide exposure, particularly
to DDT was associated with breast cancer (Woolf, et. al., 1993). There is also increased
risk in abortion as shown in the local study of Crisostomo in 2000. The latter study
showed that there was 4.06% spontaneous abortions among households engaged in
continuous pesticide application compared to 0.6% among integrated pest management
(IPM)users, and that birth defects was higher by 3.5% among pesticide users compared
to 0.91% among IPM users.
This research study aimed at determining the health issues of women in farming
as well as risks related to pesticide exposure. The result of this investigation can be used
as an essential tool for the formulation of an integrated program on safety and health of
women farmers in the agricultural sector. This investigation can also serve to increase the
awareness of women farmers on pesticide exposure throughout the country.

Methods
The study focused in Benguet, Philippines which is the largest vegetable
growing area for certain vegetables in the Philippines. More than 75% of the community
are engaged in commercial agriculture. This is why the area was chosen.
251 women farmers from the identified communities in Benguet were the sample
population for the survey questionnaire. They were selected using cluster sampling. The
clustering was based on the top four producers of vegetables in the province of Benguet.
Three focus group discussions were conducted consisting of 6-7 women farmers each.
The data collection tools included structured personal interview survey
questionnaire, and secondary data gathering. The questionnaire contained information on
demographics, pesticide practices and occupational risk factors. The FGDs looked into
cultural, political and socio-economic fators that affect women’s occupational and
environmental health issues.
This manuscript arises from an overall project that was given ethical clearance by
the National Institutes of Health, Univeristy of the Philippines Manila.

Results and Discussion

Survey Questionnaire
There was a total of 251 women farmers in this study. The farmers interviewed
were 15-78 years old, majority belonged to the 36-50 age group (49.4%). See Table 1.
76.3% of the respondents were married followed by widowed and single individuals at
16.3% and 4% respectively. Very few were separated or divorced.

Table 1. Distribution of age groups of women farmers

Age range Frequency Percentage
< 18 3 1.2
20-35 26 10.4

Journal of International Women’s Studies Vol. 11 #4 May 2010 75

36-50 124 49.4
51-65 71 28.3
>66 22 8.8

Married farmers being the bulk of this population may predispose their families to
pesticide exposure through take-home exposures such as toxins from the clothes and
shoes worn during pesticide activities or exhalation from the parent’s lungs (Cantor and
Young- Holt, 2002).
A majority of the farmers were able to finish or at least reach high school level
(31.9.%); about 34.3% reached grade school, 22.3% reached the collegiate level, 4.4%
underwent vocational studies while about 1.6% reached post graduate education. See Table 2.

Table 2. Distribution of women farmers according to educational attainment

Frequency Percentage
Grade School 86 34.3
High School 80 31.9
College 56 22.3
Vocational 11 4.4
Post-graduate 4 1.6
Did not attend school 3 1.2

When asked about the members of the household working with pesticides and
assisting in the farm, 59% said that other family members were involved. The mode of
adults working with pesticides was 3 (41.8%). 71, or 28.3% said that children under 18
years old were involved in pesticide and farming. This can pose as a siginificant problem
in regard to health of the household. McCauley et al. (2003) found significant association
between pesticide residues and the number of family members working with high
exposure pesticide activities.
Only 187 respondents chose to disclose their sexual activity and about 60.43%
had been sexually active for the past five years. 0.5% of the women had their menarche
before the age of ten. The mean age of first menstruation was 13 years old ( + 1.955).
19.3% had theirs at the age of 11-13 years old, 19% at the age of 14 to 16 years old and
3.5% experienced it at a latter age (more than 16 years old). 15.8% had normal duration
of menses while 2.3 % had prolonged duration of menses. One hundred and twenty six
women or 31.5% had regular menstruation with majority having 28 day menstrual cycle
(16.5%). 21% of the women said they had increased menstrual flow while seventy five
(18.8%) reported having dysmenorrheal or menstrual pains.
Data showed that 11.2 % of the mothers had aborted pregnancies. This may be
linked to pesticide exposure. A study has shown the positive correlation of heavy or
chronic pesticide exposure with spontaneous abortion (Bretveld, et.al., 2008).
The most commonly used pesticides in terms of duration in years was manzeb, a
carbamate, for a duration of 20 years. This was followed by chix, a pyrethroid, for 19
years, and then by tamaron, an organophosphate, for a duration of 18 years.
Organophosphorus terminates the action of acetylcholine neurotransmitter that leads to
delayed and irreversible neuromuscular effects usually seen in extremities (Vermeire,
2003; Keifer et. al., 2007). In the common parlance, this can lead to paralysis.

Journal of International Women’s Studies Vol. 11 #4 May 2010 76

 In terms of amount used, chix topped the list at 11 liters per application, followed
by maznzate, a carbamate, at 10 Liters. The rest of the information is shown in Table 3.

Table 3. Distribution of Type of pesticide by brand name used among women

farmers in Benguet (N=251)
Duration Amount used
Brand
Active ingredient Chemical grouping Mean Standard Mean Standard
name
deviation deviation
Sumicidine Fenvalerate Pyrethroid 15.5 11.6 7.5 7.0
Sabedong Cypermethrin Pyrethroid 13.6 12.8 8.3 7.2
Magnum Cypermethrin Pyrethroid 13.2 12.5 5.9 7.1
Flash Cypermethrin Pyrethroid 10.1 7.7 5.7 6.5
Karate Lambdacyhalothrin Pyrethroid 16.0 12.5 7.5 14.1
Bida Lambdacyhalothrin Pyrethroid 11.8 9.2 4.8 5.9
Chix Betacypermethrin Pyrethroid 19.0 14.9 11.0 8.7
Tamaron Methamidophos Organophosphate 18.0 11.3 3.9 7.0
Selecron Profenofos Organophosphate 13.1 10.4 5.4 6.2
Siga Chlorpyrifos Organophosphate 11.1 9.0 8.1 7.1
Round up Chlorpyrifos Organophosphate 7.8 7.9 7.6 7.1
Manzate Mancozeb Carbamate 12.1 9.7 10.2 15.8
Manzeb Mancozeb Carbamate 20.0 10.0 1.0 .01
Cartap Cartap Carbamate 11.4 10.0 7.0 7.2
Dithane Mancozeb Carbamate 17.3 11.3 6.0 11.6
Lannate Methomyl Carbamate 15.1 11.5 7.3 17.7
Padan Cartap HCl Carbamate 9.3 8.9 3.5 5.1

18.7% of the women farmers said that they received instructions from government
and business establishments on safety precautions in agriculture and pesticide
application. However, 81.3% still did not receive safety instructions.
In terms of use of personal protective equipments, majority said that they wore
them (71%). However, when itemized, 63.3% did not wear coveralls, 68.5% did not wear
gas masks, but majority wore cloth wrapped around their face as protection from
inhalation of pesticide vapours. 70.5% did not use eye goggles, while only 5% did not
wear boots. The most frequently used personal protective equipment consisted of boots
and gloves. This is consistent with a study where gloves were the most commonly used
personal protective equipment because the hands were the most exposed areas (Hines et
al., 2007).

Occupational Health Issues of the Women Farmers

Most of the women farmers reported getting sick once (47.4%), or twice (41.4%)
during the past year due to work. Only 21% of them received medical attention. 59.4%
reported that sickness was due to occupational exposure to pesticides during application
in the field.
170 respondents or 67.7 % experienced muscle pain after pesticide exposure,
while 59.8 % and 58.2% complained of weakness and easy fatigability, respectively.

Journal of International Women’s Studies Vol. 11 #4 May 2010 77

38.6% reported having fever, and 28.7% experienced loss of appetite. Adverse health
symptoms associated with risk factors in this study were also confimed in other studies
manifesting in fever and muscle pain (Meggs, 2004), weakness and easy fatigability,
and loss of appetite (Boiko, et.al., 2005).
Complaints of blurring of vision (43.8%) eye pain (42.3%), tearing of the eyes
(40%), eye itchiness (39%) and eye redness (36%) were the most commonly reported
symptoms of the eye. As for respiratory symptoms, the women farmers often complained
of coughing (55%), difficulty of breathing (20%), breathlessness (23.3%) and having
pulmonary secretions (18.5%). In an experimental study done to guinea pigs,
chlorpyrifos, an organophosphate, was found to cause airway hyperreactivity due to
inhibition of acetylcholinesterase (Allison, et.al., 2004). In another study, farm workers
with pesticide exposure usually complained of wheezing and breathlessness that could be
indicative of chronic pulmonary diseases (Yelemtsehay and Tadesse, 2002).
The use of pesticides in the agricultural sector is widespread. Pesticide exposure,
most of which are unintentional, unknowing, and unwilling is widely recognized in rural
areas because of difficulty of tracking migrant, temporal, and poor farm work
populations, and in developing countries due to excessive and inappropriate applications,
and inadequate conditions such as lack of protective equipment (Ribas-Fito, 2006).
Although pesticide exposure can occur anywhere, farm workers in medically underserved
communities are at risk, and women farmers are at greater risk due to their lack of access
to health resources (Quackenbush, et.al., 2006).

Results of FGD with Women Farmers

The table below shows the result of the FGD. It reveals certain cultural, political,
and socio- economic perceptions and attributes that affect women’s occupational health
issues.

Table 4. Cultural, political, social and economic perceptions and attributes that
affect women’s occupational issues
Factors Specific responses of Women Farmers
Cultural factors Women farmers in particular, and farmers in general are not
susceptible to illness. They believe that they are resistant to
illnesses.
The women believed that pesticides are not really toxic. Farmers
are not aware that no matter how much more pesticide is used, it
does not make it more potent. A threshold level is attained with a
particular dosage.
The women farmers are not aware that chronic illnesses can
develop over a long period of time, and may not be detectable
immediately after exposure to a hazard, and may also not be
attributable to work exposures because of its long standing effect.
The women farmers believe that occupational injuries and
illnesses occur because of fate, not because of the presence of
unsafe conditions and unsafe practices.
The women farmers believe that makeshift personal protective
equipment (PPE) are as good as the required standard PPEs. The

Journal of International Women’s Studies Vol. 11 #4 May 2010 78

 makeshift PPEs of the farmers included handkerchiefs, t-shirts
wrapped around their faces, and bonnets.
The women farmers do not see the importance of wearing
personal protective equipment. Besides, PPEs are reported to be
costly.
The women farmers said that there is lack of recognition by the
formal health care system of traditional and indigenous health
knowledge and practices.
Political factors Absence of surveillance of health and injuries among women
farmers.
Absence of occupational epidemiology among women.
Absence of programs specifically aimed at women farmers’
health.
Farmers organization are dominated by men, and that most
women remain at home or in the farm.
Women have limited access to health insurance.
Insufficient appreciation by political actors of factors that affect
women’s decision to access health care such as timing of services,
lack of time, lack of transportation fees, and unavailability of
women due to their household chores.
Socio-Economic Health is a cost.
factors
Health is secondary to commercial farming.
Health of vegetable crops given more importance than women’s
health.
Women reported of difficult access to hospitals and clinics
because of work, distance from place of work, and economic cost
of leaving the farm.
Impact of globalization on prices of fertilizers, pesticides, and
competition is affecting the women farmers. As such,there is no
extra resource allocated for health expenditures.
Women farmers wait longer to seek medical care.

There seems to be a lack of knowledge among women farmers on the adverse

effects of pesticide esposures and the need for personal protective equipments. But where
personal failures set in due to lack of resources, then political actors should intervene in
the provision of a responsible and accessible health care. The women reported that their
access to health insurance is limited, and that there is insufficient appreciation by
political actors of factors that affect their decision to access health care such as timing of
services, lack of time, lack of transportation fees, and unavailability of women due to
their household chores..
The women framers also said that political actors and technical personnel engaged
in agricultural programs are not cognizant of their cultural mileu and practices of
managing their health. The women said that they are the last to seek medical care because
of their home and farmwork.They seek self health remedies and use of herbs when they

Journal of International Women’s Studies Vol. 11 #4 May 2010 79

fall ill. The women farmers also stressed economic profit taking precendence over health
issues.
The liberalization of the agricultural market in the Philippines was perceived by
the women farmers in this study to have a negative impact on their productivity and profit.
They said that they could not compete with the influx of cheap agricultural crops from
China with the rising cost of agricultural inputs such as pesticides and fertilizers.This is a
concern that the local and national governments should look into.

Discussion
Gender analysis and balanced development
Agricultural health is often understood as men’s issues since agricultural work is
regarded as masculine. In developing counties, however, such as in the Philippines,
women are equally and actively engaged in agriculture. There are even studies that show
women’s engagement in agricultural work as more intense than that of the male. UNICEF
identified that women make up the majority of the population working in agriculture in
most developing countries, but they are marginalized with respect to economic and social
empowerment (2009). Based on the 2000 UN report, women are twice as likely as men
to be involved in agriculture-related activity. Labor participation of women workers in
the agricultural labor force vary, but globally, women have a principal role in
agribusiness, food processing, and consumer-related activity, marketing and value added
food processing. Despite this vital role of women in agriculture, their occupational health
issues are rarely discussed and covered by researchers and policy makers.
Espousing women’s agricultural and occupational issues enables us to understand that
women are also exposed to hazards in agriculture, not only men farmers. By having this
gender analysis of women’s agricultural and occupational issues, we can have hard data
and real statistics on women’s health issues in the agricultural sector. Analysis of the
situations of women can also provide an understanding of their dilemma, and thus
provide basis for change in legislation, cultural practices, policies, and programs that will
benefit them.

Pesticides and Women Farmers

Due to the need for enhance crop protection and productivity, many women
farmers utilize fertilizers and pesticides. Due to their intrinsic toxicity, in most countries a
specific and complex legislation prescribes a thorough risk assessment process for
pesticides prior to their entrance to the market. This is often referred to as pre-risk
assessment. Then there is also the post risk assessment to assess the risk of pesticides to
exposed populations. Women in the study community are at risk since majority of them
are farmers, and their homes are also interspersed within farming communities. Gender
analysis in agriculture calls for a sustainable development model that also takes into
consideration the occupational risks in agriculture. Maroni, et.al., in 2006 said that the
experience of many countries has shown that prevention of health risk caused by
pesticides is technically feasible and economically rewarding for framers and the whole
community due to the reduction of health cost.
Gender differences and inequalities lead to inequity in the health care system
since women and men have different occupational roles. Even in agricultural activities,
women take much of the burden for agricultural productivity. As a result of the unique

Journal of International Women’s Studies Vol. 11 #4 May 2010 80

 role and work that women do in agriculture, there are specific occupational injuries and
illnesses that they are confronted with. Coupled with lesser access to health resources and
their propensity to wait longer to seek medical care make them vulnerable to health
problems.

Conclusion
This manuscript has investigated certain factors affecting the occupational issues
of women farmers in Benguet. Current knowledge on the adverse effects of pesticides
especially on the health of women is largely insufficient.
It is mportant that pesticide regulatory agencies restrict the use of toxic pesticides,
and curb overuse of these chemicals. Women and agriculture are a good match, but
women and pesticides do not go together perfectly.
Gender analysis is seen as essential for solving agricultural and environmental
problems. The role of women in agriculture needs to be recognized, and institutional
support must be given including health and health care reforms for women farmers.
This study conducted in the Philippines shows the inherent work issues of women due to
their major role in farming and pesticide application. .
Gender analysis in agriculture and its many aspects is essential for policy
formulation and programme planning to ensure efforts are taken into consideration for
women farmers as well as for equity in resource allocation and a balanced development
that benefits not only men but also women farmers.

References

1. Allison D Fryer, Pamela J Lein, Angela S Howard, Bethany L (2004) Mechanisms of

organophosphate insecticide-induced airway hyperreactivity American Journal of
Physiology : Lung cellular and molecular physiology. Bethesda 30(5):5.
2. Arbucle T, Sever L. (1998)Pesticide Exposures and Fetal Death: A Review of the
Epidemiologic Literature. Critical Reviews in Toxicology 28(3), 229-70.
3. Boiko P, Keifer M, Furman J, Weyrauch K, Hanks C. (2005) Cholinesterase
Monitoring for Agricultural Pesticide Handlers: Guidelines for Health Care Providers in
Washington State.
4. Bretveld R, Hooiveld M, Zielhuis G, Pellegrino A, van Rooij I, Roeleveld N. (2008)
Reproductive disorders among male and female greenhouse workers. Reproductive
Toxicology 25:107-114.
5. Cantor A, Young-Holt B. (2002) Pregnancy related symptoms among farm workers
in rural Honduras. International Journal of Occupational and Environment Health. 1:41-
46.
6. Crisostomo L, Molina V. (2002) Pregnancy outcomes among farming households of
Nueva Ecija with conventional pesticide use versus integrated pest management.
International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health. 8:232-242.
7. de Cock J, Westveer K, Heederik D, te Velde E, van Kooij R. (1995) Time to
Pregnancy and Occupational Exxposure to Pesticides in Fruit Growers in The
Netherlands. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 52(6), 693-699.
8. Fertilizer and Pesticide Authority List of Pesticides, 2001

Journal of International Women’s Studies Vol. 11 #4 May 2010 81

9. Handal AJ, Lozoff B, Breilh J, Harlow SD. (2007) Neurobehavioral development in
children with potential exposure to pesticides. Epidemiology.18(3):312-320.
10. Ilcan SM. (2002) Peasant struggles and social change: Migration, households and
gender in a rural Turkish society. Health hazards and preventive measures of farm
women. Emerging issues. pubmed.com
11. Keifer MC, Firestone J. (2007) Neurotoxicity of pesticides. J Agromedicine.
12(1):17-25.
12. Lu, JD. (2007) Gender Differentiation among farmers in the Agricultural Sector in
Benguet, Philippines. Journal of International women Studies. 9(1): 176-199.
13. Maroni M, Fanetti AC, Metruccio F (2006). Risk assessment and management of
occupational exposure to pesticides in agriculture. La Medicina del lavoro. 97(2):430-
437.
14. McCauley LA, Michaels S, Rothlein J, Muniz J, Lasarev M, Ebbert C. (2003)
Pesticide exposure and self reported home hygiene: practices in agricultural families.
American Association of Occupational Health Nurses Journal 51:113-119.
15. McCoy CA, Carruth AK, Reed DB. (2002) Women in agriculture: risks for
occupational injury within the context of gendered role. J Agric Saf Health. 2002(1):37-
50.
16. Meeker BJ, Carruth A, Holland CB. (2002) Health hazards and preventive measures
of farm women. Emerging issues. AAOHN J. 50(7):307-14.
17. Meggs WJ. Permanent paralysis at sites of dermal exposure to chlorpyrifos. J Toxicol
Clin Toxicol: 2004;42 (7): 991-992.
18. Nabulo G, Nasinyama G, Smith D, Cole D (2005). Gender Analysis of Urban
Agriculture in Kampala, Uganda In: UA Magazine No. 12 - Gender and Urban
Agriculture
19. Preibisch KL (1994) Defending food security in a free-market economy: The
gendered dimensions of restructuring in rural Mexico. 34 pubmed.com
20. Quackenbush R, Hackley B, Dixon J. (2006) Screening for pesticide exposure: a case
study. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health 51(1): 3-11.
21. Ribas-Fito N. (2006) Silent Invaders: Pesticides, Livelihoods and Women's Health.
International Journal of Epidemiology 35(2): 504-505.
22. Rao P, Arcury,TA., Quandt, SA., & Doran, A (2004) North Carolina Growers' and
Extension Agents' Perceptions of Latino Farmworker Pesticide Exposure. Human
Organization 63:151-162.
23. UNICEF (2009). Gender analysis and balanced development In:
http://www.rwandagateway.org/gateway_new/spip.
24. Vermeire T, McPhail R, Waters M. (2003) Integrated human and ecological risk
assessment: A case study of organophosphorous pesticides in the environment. Human
and Ecological Risk Assessment 9(1): 343-358.
25. Yalemtsehay M, Tadesse A.(2002) Effects of pesticide applications on respiratory
health of Ethiopian farm workers. International Journal of Occupational and
Environmental Health..8:35-41.
26. Woolf M. (1993) Blood Levels of Organochlorine Residues and Risk of Breast
Cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institut. 85: 648-652.
27. www.fpa.org.ph

Journal of International Women’s Studies Vol. 11 #4 May 2010 82