STEP 2 2019 Report, Hints, Mark Scheme
STEP 2 2019 Report, Hints, Mark Scheme
STEP 2 2019 Report, Hints, Mark Scheme
Mathematics 2 [9470]
2019
Examiner’s Report
Mark Scheme
Sixth Term Examination Paper
Mathematics 2 [9470]
2019
Contents
Examiner’s Report 3
Hints and Solutions 17
Mark Scheme 30
The Pure questions were again the most popular of the paper, with only one of the questions
attempted by fewer than half of the candidates (of the remaining four questions, only question 9
was attempted by more than a quarter of the candidates). In many of the questions candidates were
often unable to make good use of the results shown in the earlier parts of the question in order to
solve the more complex later parts. Nevertheless, some good solutions were seen to all of the
questions. For many of the questions, solutions were seen in which the results were reached, but
without sufficient justification of some of the steps.
This was the question answered by the largest proportion of candidates and many good solutions
were seen. However, many candidates did not appreciate the importance of the phrase if and only if
in parts of this question. As a result a large number of attempts failed to achieve full marks as it was
not made clear that the reasoning presented also worked in the opposite direction.
Having shown the first result, many candidates were able to identify the appropriate choice of 𝑔 𝑥
when attempting part (i) and successfully showed that 2𝑎 𝑞 𝑟. Many were also able to find a
correct expression for the gradient, although some did not find this expression in terms of the
variables requested.
In part (ii) a pleasing number of candidates were able to recognise that the results from part (i)
would be relevant here as well. Again, some of the solutions to this part failed to recognise that the
question required the result to be shown in both directions.
This question was another popular question that was generally well answered, achieving the second‐
best average mark of all of the questions and was also the question for which the largest number of
solutions received full marks. Most candidates drew a convincing sketch to demonstrate that the
two integrals make a rectangle. Arguments from sketches showing the inverse function and
reflective symmetry were less successful and often candidates’ diagrams assumed 𝑥 to be a fixed
point of 𝑓 𝑡 .
By far the most common mistake in the first part was to notice the solution 𝑔 2 1 but not to
factorise and use the quadratic discriminant to show that no other solutions were possible. The
conceptually difficult part was to use 𝑔 𝑦 𝑦 𝑦, and many candidates stopped just before
this point.
In the final part, many candidates tried to apply the stem identity in its original form, without
noticing that ℎ 0 0. This was the most difficult part, and those who modified it correctly
generally did well. Candidates sometimes failed to check that ℎ′ 𝑡 0, but this was not necessary
for those who used ℎ 𝑡 𝑔 𝑡 2 .
While this was a popular question it was also the one where the average mark achieved by
candidates was the lowest. In this question many of the results to be reached were given in the
question. Students therefore need to recognise that it is necessary for solutions to be presented very
clearly, and it is for this reason that many solutions in the first parts did not achieve full marks. For
example, justifications of the generalised result for a set of 𝑛 real numbers expressed in the form of
an inductive proof were the most successful.
For most candidates the majority of marks were scored in the sections up to and including part (i)(b).
Many candidates were then unable to see how to work in the cases where |𝑥| 1 for part (i)(c). In
the final part, candidates were often unable to put the equation into the form that had been used in
the earlier parts of the questions and therefore did not manage to reduce the possible values of the
integer roots to a sufficiently small set.
This was a well‐answered question, but also one in which a fairly large number of solutions scored
very low marks. The majority of candidates were able to evaluate the first product using the identify
provided and most were then able to apply the same technique to simplify the first expression in
part (i). Many students then differentiated, but some then struggled to manage the notation
correctly to reach the second result requested in part (ii).
Part (iii) required some care to ensure that the sums and products were over the correct range, but
those who managed to adjust correctly for this were then able to reach the required results.
It was difficult to get full marks on this question, with most candidates struggling to correctly prove
‘if and only if’ statements in both directions.
Mostly, the two constant sequences were successfully found and then correctly rejected for
sequences of period 2, but few thought to check that the other two solutions to the quartic did not
also coincide with the constant sequences. Most candidates were able to use the discriminant to
produce bounds on 𝑝, but many could not justify the strictness of the inequality, which was best
done by considering the boundary cases separately.
The first request of the second part was answered well, with most using only the fact that it was a
positive quadratic and a minority delving into the details of 𝑓 𝑥 . Most candidates who reached this
part of the questions correctly used the result 𝑓 𝑥 𝑥 to show that 𝑓 𝑓 𝑥 𝑥 has no solutions,
but many overlooked the connection between the final part and part (i).
Of the Pure questions, this was the question that had the lowest average mark, mainly due to the
large number of attempts that did not manage to score any marks.
Many candidates seemed uncomfortable with this question which asked them to look at what
information can be gleaned about differential equations without directly solving them. Many
candidates decided that the only way to proceed was to solve the differential equation, and almost
invariably this led to long and convoluted methods. Candidates seemed to have very little idea that
the differential equation can be interpreted as the gradient of a curve at different points – it was
simply an object on which certain methods had to be applied. A surprisingly small number of
candidates realised that setting 0 could (and should) be done directly in the differential
equation to find the locus of stationary points.
This was also a question which required candidates to bring a lot of disparate information together
in the final sketches. A large number of candidates said things like the gradient was negative
between two lines, but their sketch showed something different. Some who said that there should
be stationary points on the line 𝑦 𝑥 1 and 𝑦 𝑥 3 drew their curve tangentially to these two
lines instead.
Overall this was a question which really benefitted candidates who took a moment to stop and think
about what was being suggested, rather than blindly applying methods.
This was the least popular of the Pure questions. Good solutions to this question often included clear
diagrams to enable the angles being discussed to be identified easily. Many of the candidates were
able to calculate the value of 𝒂 ∙ 𝒃 correctly, but often did not fully justify that the triangle 𝐴𝐵𝐶 was
equilateral.
For the second part, many candidates were again able to establish the relationship between scalar
products, but less success was seen in identifying the type of quadrilateral. In the final part there
were a large number of different approaches taken and many of these were completed successfully
by some of the candidates.
Many good solutions were seen to this question, but solutions often lacked clear enough justification
to be awarded full marks. However, there were also a surprising number of candidates who did not
manage to invert the 2x2 matrices successfully. Candidates who claimed that the function 𝑓 was the
determinant of the matrix were not able to score high marks as the solutions did not then
demonstrate that the results were true of any function satisfying the property given.
The first two parts of this question were largely done well. The third part was found more difficult,
𝑎 𝑏 1 0 𝑎 𝑏
with few candidates realising that . Those who did were then often
𝑘𝑎 𝑘𝑏 0 𝑘 𝑎 𝑏
able to provide a full solution, although often these were not fully justified. Several candidates
1 0 𝑎 𝑏 𝑎 𝑏
instead used to produce a solution which covered all cases apart
0 𝑘 𝑘 𝑎 𝑘 𝑏 𝑎 𝑏
𝑎 𝑏
from the one where 𝑘 0. In some cases, candidates did not appear to consider to be an
0 0
example of a matrix in which the second row was a multiple of the first.
In part (iv) many candidates made use of the fact that 𝑓 𝑃 0 without showing that this must be
the case.
This was the most popular of the Mechanics and Statistics questions, but also one of the questions
that attracted a large number of solutions that received no marks.
Students seemed relatively good at setting up the kinematics equations in this question and most
had the useful idea of differentiating. Somewhat fewer thought about using either completing the
square or the quadratic discriminant to decide where the derivative was positive. The logic of the
question was very poorly understood, with many students seeing the given inequality as the end
point rather than the starting point of the question.
In the second part of part (i) it was important that students demonstrated not just that a time
existed where the distance is decreasing, but that this time was in the acceptable domain of the
question.
Part (ii) was conceptually very similar to part (i) but most students found the increased algebraic
demand too much.
As with so many questions, the big stumbling block for students was drawing a good diagram from
the information, including all the relevant forces.
With “show that” questions it is beholden on candidates to explain their working. Equations which
just appear and lead to the correct answer are not sufficient. In mechanics, it would be very helpful
for students to say, for example, “Taking moments about point A for the rod” or “Resolving for the
string ‐rod system vertically” to give some sense of where an equation arises.
The flow of logic is a fundamental idea in mathematics, but it was clear in this question that it was
not familiar to the vast majority of students. The questions effectively asked “if <given condition>
show that <mechanical outcome>”. Most students reversed this to show that “if <mechanical
outcome> then <given condition>”. In this question, most arguments were reversible, but it still
demonstrated a fundamental misunderstanding of what was being asked.
The other issue which flummoxed students was dealing with inequalities. There are different rules of
algebra associated with inequalities and this is something which is frequently tested in STEP.
Candidates would benefit from thinking carefully about things like when can one inequality be
substituted into another, or when can an inequality be squared. The intuition from equalities was
too often applied without thinking.
Those who could obtain the result given for odd 𝑛 in part (ii) were generally able to find the
corresponding result for even 𝑛 too. A common error was to double count the number of pairs of
rods and not to double the number of pairs which made a triangle. Many candidates failed to
explain why the conditions of part (i) were relevant for forming triangles.
The most successful candidates in part (iii) counted the number of triples which make a triangle
using a sum, and divided by , while those who conditioned on the largest rod and used
conditional probability did less well. A common conceptual error was to assume that each integer
was equally likely to appear as the largest rod, and candidates making this assumption lost many
marks. Otherwise, algebraic errors were the most common. Candidates should remember that
when an answer is given in the question, they need to take care to fully justify their answers.
Almost all candidates who attempted this question were able to achieve full marks on the first part.
In the second part, the values of the interquartile range and 2𝜎 were generally found correctly, but
then many candidates did not realise that squaring would eliminate the square roots from the values
to be compared.
In the final part of the question some candidates failed to recognise that the 𝑘 1 term of the
expansion was the term in 𝑥 and gave the term in 𝑥 instead. A good number were successful in
finding the lower quartile and the median, but only a minority realised that 𝜇 1 . Those
that did were more successful in proving that 𝜇 than 𝜇 .
For the introductory part, first find an equation of the tangent to the curve at the point with 𝑥 𝑎.
An expression can then be found for the 𝑦‐coordinate of the point on the tangent where 𝑥 𝑝 and
this can easily be shown to be equal to 0 if and only if 𝑔 𝑎 0.
In part (i), the first result follows by identifying that 𝑔 𝑥 𝐴 𝑥 𝑞 𝑥 𝑟 allows the first result
to be applied. The gradient of the tangent can be found by differentiating 𝑓 𝑥 and then the fact
that 2𝑎 𝑞 𝑟 can be used to eliminate 𝑎 from this expression.
In part (ii) the tangent at the point where 𝑥 𝑐 is essentially another case of the tangent considered
in part (i), so the gradient of this tangent can be deduced easily. By equating the gradients of the two
tangents it can be deduced that 𝑞 𝑝 𝑟 𝑞 (although care needs to be taken to justify the choice
of square roots). The equation of the tangent at 𝑥 𝑞 can also be found and so any other points of
intersection between this tangent and the curve can be found. The result then follows easily.
From a sketch of the function, it can be seen that the first integral corresponds to an area below the
curve and the second integral corresponds to an area to the left of the curve. These two areas make
a rectangle, whose area is clearly expressed by the expression on the right of the equation.
To evaluate the integral, observe that 𝑔 𝑠 𝑠 𝑠 and apply the result shown at the start of the
question.
For the second part it must be noted that this function does not satisfy the conditions for the initial
result to be applied. However, it can be seen that ℎ 𝑡 𝑔 𝑡 2 .
The initial result can be shown by considering the four possible combinations of signs for 𝑥 and 𝑥 .
Induction can then be used to prove the more general result.
In part (i)(a) the initial result can then be applied to show that the value of 𝑓 𝑥 1 must be less
than or equal to a polynomial in |𝑥|. Furthermore, the coefficients must also be less than or equal to
𝐴 and so the value must be less than or equal to a sum that can be seen to be a geometric sequence.
For the final part, observe that division by 135 produces a polynomial that satisfies the conditions
specified and so the bounds on the value of 𝜔 reduces the cases to be considered to 𝜔 1 and
𝜔 2.
In the first part, if the expression to be evaluated is multiplied by sin , then three applications of
the given identity can be used. A similar process can then be used to simplify the first expression in
part (ii). For the sum, note that tan 𝑥 is the derivative of ln cos 𝑥 and so, the result can be
obtained by taking logs of the first result and then differentiating term by term.
In part (i) the values of 𝑎 for which the sequence is constant can be found by solving the equation
𝑎 𝑓 𝑎 . The sequence will have period 2 if the equation 𝑎 𝑓 𝑓 𝑎 has a solution that is
different from those for which the sequence is constant. Although the equation 𝑎 𝑓 𝑓 𝑎 is a
quartic, it is clear that the values of 𝑎 for which the sequence is constant will be solutions of this
equation as well. This means that two factors of the quartic are known and so the remaining factor
will be a quadratic. When considering the roots of this quadratic it must also be checked to confirm
that the roots are not repeats of the values that give a constant sequence.
In part (ii), note that there cannot be a solution to the equation 𝑓 𝑎 𝑎 and so it must be the case
that either 𝑓 𝑥 𝑥 for all 𝑥 or 𝑓 𝑥 𝑥 for all 𝑥 (since 𝑓 is a continuous function). It is clear that
𝑓 𝑥 𝑥 for large values of 𝑥.
Since it must be that case that 𝑓 𝑥 𝑥 for all 𝑥 if the sequence is not constant, it must also be the
case that 𝑓 𝑓 𝑥 𝑥 for all 𝑥.
Finally, it can be seen that, in the case where 𝑞 𝑝 the sequence is of the form in part (i) and so it
should be possible to deduce a case in which there is no value of 𝑎 for which the sequence has
period 2, but there is a value of 𝑎 for which the sequence is constant.
In the first part, substituting 𝑦 𝑚𝑥 𝑐 into the differential equation will allow the values of 𝑚 and
𝑐 to be deduced. Since stationary points must satisfy 0, substituting this into the differential
equation shows that stationary points must lie on the given line. It then follows that solution curves
with 𝑘 2 cannot have stationary points as they would have to cross the straight‐line solution that
has already been found.
Given that the relationship between 𝑥 and 𝑦 for any stationary point is known, it is possible to
differentiate the differential equation and evaluate for any stationary point.
Once the substitution provided has been applied, the new differential equation can be solved by
separating the variables and have equations that can be sketched easily.
In the second part, the same approach as part (i) can be used to find the possible sets of values for
𝑚 and 𝑐. The RHS of the differential equation can be considered a function of 𝑦 𝑥 and this allows
it to be factorised. Solving 0 then shows that 𝑥 and 𝑦 must satisfy one of two linear equations
and the sign of can be deduced for points between these two lines.
The graph can then be sketched, remembering that the curve cannot cross the two straight‐line
solutions.
In part (i), taking the scalar product of 𝒂 𝒃 𝒄 with each of the vectors in turn produces a set of
three equations from which it can be deduced that 𝒂 ∙ 𝒃 𝒃 ∙ 𝒄 𝒄 ∙ 𝒂 and that any pair of them
add up to 1. Alternatively, it can be observed that 𝒂 𝒃 ∙ 𝒂 𝒃 𝒄 ∙ 𝒄 .
It can then be shown that the angle between any pair of these vectors is 120° and so a sketch shows
that the triangle must be equilateral.
In part (ii), a similar approach will lead to the given result. Alternatively, the result can be obtained
by observing that 𝒂𝟏 𝒂𝟐 ∙ 𝒂𝟏 𝒂𝟐 𝒂𝟑 𝒂𝟒 ∙ 𝒂𝟑 𝒂𝟒 . For part (a), note that it must
be the case that the angle between any pair of vectors is equal to the angle between the other two
vectors.
For part (b) use the vector 𝒂𝟏 𝒂𝟐 ) to find the length of one side of the tetrahedron. From the fact
that the tetrahedron is regular it can be deduced that 𝒂𝟏 ∙ 𝒂𝟐 𝒂𝟏 ∙ 𝒂𝟑 𝒂𝟏 ∙ 𝒂𝟒 . The side length
can then be calculated.
In part (i), the property of 𝑓 means that 𝑓 𝑴 𝑓 𝑴𝑰 𝑓 𝑴 𝑓 𝑰 . Note that justification of
𝑓 𝑰 1 requires that 𝑓 𝑴 0.
𝑎 𝑏
For part (iii), first show that 𝑓 0 by applying the result of part (ii) and then pre‐multiply
𝑎 𝑏
this matrix by 𝑲 to obtain one in which the second row is a multiple of the first.
In part (i), the position vector of the particle at time 𝑡 can be calculated. The distance 𝑂𝑃 is then the
modulus of this vector. It is easier to differentiate the square of the distance with respect to time
(which is sufficient as this will be increasing if and only if the distance is increasing). The resulting
√ √
expression can be shown to be positive if sin 𝛼 . Similarly, in the case where sin 𝛼 it is
possible to identify a value of 𝑡 for which the distance is certainly decreasing and show that this is
before the moment at which the particle lands.
In part (ii), the vector 𝑄𝑃 can again be calculated and then the distance 𝑃𝑄 found by taking the
modulus. As in part (i) it is simpler to deal with 𝑃𝑄 rather than 𝑃𝑄. In this case, care must be taken
with the inequality to check that both sides are positive before they are squared and used to justify
that the distance is increasing throughout the flight of 𝑃.
A diagram is very useful in this question. First, note that the triangle 𝐴𝐵𝐶 must be isosceles and then
take moments about 𝐴. In the case given in part (i) this then shows that 𝑇 𝑊 and so the string will
break.
In part (ii), resolve the forces vertically to find an expression for the reaction force and then this can
be used to find an expression for the maximum possible value for the frictional force. 𝑊 can then be
eliminated using the equation in part (i) found by taking moments about A. Rearranging then leads
to an expression that can be used to explain the required result.
For the third part, the values of 𝑘 for which breaking and slipping occur can be found from the
answers to part (i). These two values can be used to set up an inequality that must be satisfied in
order for slipping to occur before the string breaks.
In part (i), the numbers of ways of choosing the pairs can be found by checking the numbers of
possible values for 𝑛 for each choice of 𝑛 . A clear list of the possibilities for each case should then
make generalised formulae for the cases 𝑛 2𝑛 1 and 𝑛 2𝑛.
In part (ii), the possible combinations which lead to a triangle match those found in the first part of
𝑁 1
the question. There are possibilities for the shorter two rods if the length of the longest rod
2
is known, so combining this with the answers to part (i) the probability can be calculated for each of
the two cases to be considered.
In part (iii), the probability can be calculated by multiplying the probability in part (ii) for each
possible length of the longest rod by the probability that that length is the longest of the three rods.
Adding all of these together will result in the overall probability that the rods can form a triangle.
In part (ii), use integration to find the values of the quartiles and hence the interquartile range.
Square the two values to allow them to be compared with each other.
In part (iii), the binomial expansion should be easy to write down, but note that the 𝑘 1 term
is the term in 𝑥 , not 𝑥 . The lower quartile and median can be evaluated by integration of 𝑓 𝑥 .
To show the inequalities, note that 1 and that each term in the expansion is positive,
so the value must be greater than the sum of the first two terms. Similarly, the 𝑘 1 term of the
expansion can be shown to be greater than , so the result that may be assumed will lead to the
!
other inequality.
Tangent passes through 𝑎, 𝑎 𝑝 𝑔 𝑎
Equation of tangent is
𝑦 𝑔 𝑎 𝑎 𝑝 𝑔’ 𝑎 𝑥 𝑎 𝑎 𝑝 𝑔 𝑎 M1
(or equivalent equation) A1
Gradient of tangent is
𝑔 𝑎 𝑎 𝑝 𝑔’ 𝑎
𝐴 𝑎 𝑞 𝑎 𝑟 M1
𝐴 𝑟 𝑞 A1
(4 marks)
(ii) By symmetry, the gradient of the second tangent is
𝐴 𝑝 𝑞 (can be implied) B1
Parallel iff
M1
𝑝 𝑞 𝑞 𝑟
⇔ 𝑞 𝑝 𝑟 𝑞 A1
since 𝑝 𝑞 𝑟. E1
Tangent at 𝑥 𝑞,
𝑦 𝐴 𝑞 𝑝 𝑞 𝑟 𝑥 𝑞 , M1
Meets curve again when
𝑞 𝑝 𝑞 𝑟 𝑥 𝑞 𝑥 𝑝 𝑥 𝑟 𝑥 𝑞
⇔ 𝑞 𝑝 𝑞 𝑟 𝑥 𝑝 𝑥 𝑟 since 𝑥 𝑞 M1
(cancellation must be justified for M1, can be awarded if used
correctly on 𝑥 𝑞 𝑥 𝑝 𝑟 𝑞 later)
⇔ 𝑥 𝑞 𝑥 𝑝 𝑟 𝑞 0 M1
⇔𝑥 𝑝 𝑟 𝑞 or 𝑥 𝑞 A1
Therefore there is only one point of intersection between the tangent
and the curve if and only if 𝑝 𝑟 𝑞 𝑞, which is if and only if the E1
tangents are parallel. E1 (AG)
One E mark for each direction. (10 marks)
J
© UCLES 31 STEP MATHEMATICS 2 2019
STEP II 2019 Mark Scheme
2 Sketch with areas
𝑓 𝑡 𝑑𝑡 , 𝑓 𝑦 𝑑𝑦 and rectangle G1 G1
correctly identified. (One mark any one)
(2 marks)
(i) 𝑔 0 𝑔 0 1 0 factorised M1
𝑔 0 real so 𝑔 0 0 (must be justified) A1 (AG)
1 3𝑔 𝑡 1 𝑔′ 𝑡 M1
3𝑔 𝑡 1 0 so 𝑔 𝑡 0 A1 (AG)
𝑔 2 𝑔 2 2 0
𝑔 2 1 𝑔 2 𝑔 2 2 0 M1
Δ 7 0 so 𝑔 2 1 or g(2)>0 justified A1
𝑔 𝑠 𝑠 𝑠 B1
𝑔 𝑡 𝑑𝑡 2𝑔 2 𝑔 𝑠 𝑑𝑠 M1
A1
(9 marks)
(ii) ℎ 𝑡 𝑔 𝑡 2 M1
so ℎ 0 𝑔 2 1 and ℎ 𝑡 0 A1
ℎ 8 2 ℎ 8 2ℎ 8 5 0 M1
ℎ 8 2 correctly justified A1
ℎ 𝑠 𝑠 𝑠 2 B1
ℎ 𝑡 𝑑𝑡 ℎ 𝑠 𝑑𝑠 16 (or similar correct equation) M1 A1
ℎ 𝑡 𝑑𝑡 16 𝑠 𝑠 2 𝑑𝑠
16 2𝑠 (integration)
M1
12
A1
(9 marks)
|𝑥 ⋯ 𝑥 𝑥 | |𝑥 ⋯ 𝑥 | |𝑥 |
⋯ E1
|𝑥 | ⋯ |𝑥 | |𝑥 | by induction
(2 marks)
(i) (a) |𝑓 𝑥 1| |𝑎 𝑥 ⋯ 𝑎 𝑥 𝑥 |
|𝑎 𝑥| ⋯ |𝑎 𝑥 | |𝑥 | M1
|𝑎 ||𝑥| ⋯ |𝑎 ||𝑥| |𝑥| M1
𝐴 |𝑥| ⋯ |𝑥| |𝑥| M1
𝐴 |𝑥| ⋯ |𝑥| |𝑥| (justified) M1
| | | |
𝐴 M1
| |
| |
𝐴 (justified) A1 (AG)
| |
(6 marks)
(b) 1 | | M1
using 𝑓 𝜔 0
| |
1 𝐴 1 |𝜔| (with sign of 1 |𝜔| justified) A1 (AG)
𝐴 1 1 |𝑤| B1 (AG)
(3 marks)
(c) If |𝜔| 1,
0 𝜔 𝑓 M1
1 𝑎 𝜔 ⋯ 𝑎 𝜔 𝜔
Inequalities continue to hold since |𝑎 | 𝐴 E1
(3 marks)
(ii) 𝑓 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 1 B1
Use 𝐴 1. M1
M1
Integer roots with |𝜔| 2 could only be 1 or 2
𝑓 2 0 because numerator is odd (or any valid justification) E1
𝑓 1 0 A1
𝑓 1 0
𝑥 1 is the only integer root. A1
(6 marks)
© UCLES 33 STEP MATHEMATICS 2 2019
STEP II 2019 Mark Scheme
4 (i) sin cos cos cos B1
M1
sin cos cos
sin
sin (use of sin 𝜋 𝑥 sin 𝑥 ) M1
(4 marks)
(ii) 𝑥 𝑥 B1
sin cos
2 2
1 𝑥 𝑥 M1
sin cos
2 2 2
E1
⋯ (convincing use of induction or repeated application)
(induction end point correct)
𝑥 sin 2𝑥
cos 𝑥 A1
2 2 sin
2
𝑥 𝑥
log 𝑐𝑜𝑠 log sin 2𝑥 log 𝑠𝑖𝑛 log 2 M1 (diff)
2 2
M1
1 𝑥 1 𝑥 (division)
tan 2 cot 2𝑥 cot
2 2 2 2
(justified with differentiation) A1 (AG)
(7 marks)
(iii) B1 – switch to product starting at 0
M1 – set up as limiting case of product to n
M1 – apply small angle for sin
A1 – correct answer
𝑥 sin 2𝑥
cos 𝑥 M1
2 2 sin cos 𝑥
2
2 sin 𝑥 M1
𝑥
2 sin
2
sin 𝑥
~ 𝑥 M1
2
2
sin 𝑥 A1 (AG)
𝑥
© UCLES 34 STEP MATHEMATICS 2 2019
STEP II 2019 Mark Scheme
1 𝜋
tan
2 2
M1
1 𝜋/4
tan
2 2
1 𝜋/4 𝜋 M1
lim cot 2 cot
→ 2 2 2
M1
1
lim
→ 𝜋/4
2 tan
2
M1
1
lim
→ 𝜋/4
2
2
A1
4
𝜋 (9 marks)
© UCLES 35 STEP MATHEMATICS 2 2019
STEP II 2019 Mark Scheme
5 (i) Constant iff 𝑎 𝑓 𝑎 M1
⇔𝑎 𝑝 𝑎 𝑝 𝑎
⇔0 𝑎 𝑝 𝑎 1 M1
⇔ 𝑎 𝑝 or 𝑎 1. A1
Period 2
⇔ 𝑎 𝑓 𝑓 𝑎 M1
⇔0 𝑎 𝑝 1 2𝑎𝑝 𝑝𝑎 𝑎 (factorisation) M1
⇔0 𝑎 𝑝 𝑎 1 𝑎 1 𝑝 𝑎 1 A1
(12 marks)
(ii) No value of 𝑎 for which the sequence is constant
⇔𝑓 𝑎 𝑎 has no solution E1 ()
⇔𝑓 𝑥 𝑥 or 𝑓 𝑥 𝑥 for all 𝑥 E1 ()
But 𝑓 𝑥 𝑥 for large 𝑥.
So cannot have 𝑓 𝑥 𝑥 for all 𝑥. E1
If no value of a for which sequence constant,
then 𝑓 𝑥 𝑥 for all 𝑥 E1
So 𝑓 𝑓 𝑥 𝑓 𝑥 𝑥 for all 𝑥 E1
And hence no solution to 𝑓 𝑓 𝑎 𝑎. E1
© UCLES 36 STEP MATHEMATICS 2 2019
STEP II 2019 Mark Scheme
6 (i) If 𝑦 𝑚𝑥 𝑐,
Then the differential equation becomes
𝑚 𝑚𝑥 𝑐 𝑥 1 M1
𝑚 1, 𝑐 2
𝑦 𝑥 2 A1
𝑦 𝑦 𝑥 cannot cross the line 𝑦 𝑥 2.
So if 𝑦 0 2, it cannot reach the line 𝑦 𝑥 1 and hence has E1
no stationary points.
At a stationary point,
E1
1 𝑦 𝑥 2 1 0 so minimum
𝑌 2 M1
log 𝑌 2 𝑥 𝑐 M1
𝑌 2 𝐴𝑒
𝑦 𝑥 2 𝐴𝑒 A1
𝑦 0 0 ⇒ 𝐴 2 M1
𝑦 0 3⇒𝐴 1 (attempt at both)
So 𝑦 𝑥 2 2𝑒
So 𝑦 𝑥 2 𝑒 (both)
Curves tending to asymptote to the left G1
Curve above line through origin tending to ∞ G1
Curve below line tending to ∞ G1
(12 marks)
(ii) If 𝑦 𝑚𝑥 𝑐,
Then the differential equation becomes
𝑚 𝑚𝑥 𝑐 4 𝑚𝑥 𝑐 𝑥 4𝑥 2𝑥 𝑚𝑥 𝑐 3
0 𝑚 2𝑥 1 𝑥 2𝑚𝑐 4𝑚 4 2𝑐 𝑐 4𝑐 3 𝑚
From 𝑥 : 𝑚 1
From 𝑥: 2𝑚𝑐 4𝑚 4 2𝑐 2𝑐 4 4 2𝑐 0
© UCLES 37 STEP MATHEMATICS 2 2019
STEP II 2019 Mark Scheme
From 1: 𝑐 4𝑐 2 0 ⇒ 𝑐 2 √2
Any of these equations M1
Correct values of 𝑚 and 𝑐 A1
Solutions: 𝑦 𝑥 2 √2
Between these lines the gradient is negative. (Correctly justified) A1
G1
Curve does not intersect other solutions
G1
Curve has stationary points on correct lines
(8 marks)
© UCLES 38 STEP MATHEMATICS 2 2019
STEP II 2019 Mark Scheme
7 (i) 𝒂⋅ 𝒂 𝒃 𝒄 0 M1
𝒂⋅𝒃 𝒂⋅𝒄 1 and cyclic permutations M1
𝒂⋅𝒃 legitimately obtained A1
cos 𝜃 where 𝜃 is the angle between 𝒂 and 𝒃 M1
𝜃 120° A1
Similarly, the angle between 𝒂 and 𝒃 is 120°. M1
Justification of equilateral triangle by sketch or otherwise M1
ABC is equilateral A1
(8 marks)
(ii) 𝒂𝟏 ⋅ 𝒂 𝟐 𝒂𝟏 ⋅ 𝒂 𝟑 𝒂𝟏 ⋅ 𝒂 𝟒 1 and cyclic permutations M1
Linear combination of these equations M1
𝒂𝟏 ⋅ 𝒂𝟐 𝒂𝟑 ⋅ 𝒂𝟒 (legitimately obtained) A1 (AG)
(3 marks)
(a) Angles ∠𝐴 𝑂𝐴 ∠𝐴 𝑂𝐴 M1
By symmetry, ∠𝐴 𝑂𝐴 ∠𝐴 𝑂𝐴
The 𝒂𝒊 are distinct and unit length so no angles are zero (accept M1
justification by sketch)
𝐴 𝐴 𝐴 𝐴 is a rectangle A1
(3 marks)
(b) 𝐴 𝐴 𝒂𝟏 𝒂𝟐
𝒂𝟏 𝒂𝟏 2𝒂𝟏 ⋅ 𝒂𝟐 M1
2 2𝒂𝟏 ⋅ 𝒂𝟐 M1
By symmetry, 𝒂𝟏 ⋅ 𝒂𝟐 𝒂𝟏 ⋅ 𝒂𝟑 𝒂𝟏 ⋅ 𝒂 𝟒 M1
𝟏
So 𝒂𝟏 ⋅ 𝒂𝟐 A1
𝟑
M1
So 𝐴 𝐴
√
𝐴 𝐴 A1
√
(6 marks)
© UCLES 39 STEP MATHEMATICS 2 2019
STEP II 2019 Mark Scheme
8 (i) 𝑓 𝑴 𝑓 𝑴𝑰 𝑓 𝑴 𝑓 𝑰 M1
⇒𝑓 𝑰 1 since 𝑓 𝑴 0 A1 (AG)
(2 marks)
(ii) 𝑓 𝐽 𝑓 𝐽 M1
𝑓 𝐼 1 M1
⇒𝑓 𝐽 1 since 𝑓 𝐽 1 A1
𝑐 𝑑 0 1 𝑎 𝑏 M1
𝑓 𝑓
𝑎 𝑏 1 0 𝑐 𝑑
𝑎 𝑏
𝑓 legitimately obtained A1 (AG)
𝑐 𝑑
𝑑 𝑐 𝑐 𝑑 0 1
𝑓 𝑓 M1
𝑏 𝑎 𝑎 𝑏 1 0
𝑐 𝑑 A1 (AG)
𝑓 legitimately obtained
𝑎 𝑏
(7 marks)
(iii) Using first equality in previous part (or otherwise correctly justified)
𝑎 𝑏 𝑎 𝑏 M1
𝑓 𝑓
𝑎 𝑏 𝑎 𝑏
𝑎 𝑏
𝑓 0 M1
𝑎 𝑏
𝑎 𝑏 𝑎 𝑏
𝑓 𝑓 𝑲 M1
𝑘𝑎 𝑘𝑏 𝑎 𝑏
0 A1 (AG)
(4 marks)
(iv) 1 𝑘 B1
𝑲 𝑷𝑲
0 1
𝑓 𝑲 𝑓 𝑲 𝐹 𝑰 1⇒𝑓 𝑲 𝑓 𝑲 M1
𝑓 𝑲 𝑷𝑲 𝑓 𝑲 𝑓 𝑷𝑲 (must use two stages) M1
𝑓 𝑲 𝑓 𝑷 𝑓 𝑲
𝑓 𝑷 A1 (AG)?
2 1 B1
𝑷
1 0
𝑓 𝑷 𝑓 𝑷 ⇒𝑓 𝑷 0 or 1 M1
𝟏 A1
𝑷 exists so 𝑓 𝑷 𝑓 𝑷 1⇒𝑓 𝑷 0
(7 marks)
√ M1
If sin 𝛼 , then 2𝑢 𝑢 sin 𝛼 0
and distance is always increasing. A1 (AG)
√
If sin 𝛼 , then distance is decreasing at 𝑡 sin 𝛼 M1
Landing occurs at 𝑡 sin 𝛼, which is later E1
(Or imagine falls through ground. Distance increasing while
underground, so any decrease must be above ground)
(11 marks)
(ii) 𝑢𝑡 cos 𝛼 𝑣𝑡
𝒓 𝑢𝑡 sin 𝛼 𝑔𝑡
B1
𝑢 sin 𝛼
(9 marks)
© UCLES 41 STEP MATHEMATICS 2 2019
STEP II 2019 Mark Scheme
10 (i) Correct diagram B2
Moments about A:
𝑊𝑎 cos 𝜃 1 2𝑘 2𝑎𝑇 sin 2𝜃 M1
If 2𝑘 1 4 sin 𝜃 then
2𝑇 sin 2𝜃 𝑊 cos 𝜃 4 sin 𝜃 2𝑊 sin 2𝜃 M1
Since sin 2𝜃 0, A1
𝑇 𝑊 and so the string will break. A1 (AG)
(6 marks)
(ii) Resolving forces vertically:
𝑅 𝑘 1 𝑊 𝑇 sin 𝜃 M1
Resolving horizontally, ring will slip if:
𝑇 cos 𝜃 𝜇 𝑘 1 𝑊 𝑇 sin 𝜃 (= max value for friction) M1
Moments about A:
𝑊 2𝑘 1 4𝑇 sin 𝜃
𝜇 𝑘 1 𝑊 𝑇 sin 𝜃 𝜇 1 𝑇 sin 𝜃 M1
(6 marks)
(iii) Attempt to solve breaking inequality for 𝑘 M1
Breaks at 𝑘 A1
Attempt to solve slipping inequality for 𝑘
B1
Slips at 𝑘
If ring slips before it breaks:
(for A1, do not allow >) M1 A1
Confirming that inequality is being multiplied by a positive quantity.
E1
3𝜇 tan 𝜃 1 4 sin 𝜃 1
M1 A1
𝜇 (AG)
(8 marks)
© UCLES 42 STEP MATHEMATICS 2 2019
STEP II 2019 Mark Scheme
11 (i) In both cases, award the M mark if all possible values of 𝑛 for at
least 3 values of 𝑛 are identified.
𝒏𝟑 𝟗 M1
𝑛 1; 𝑛 has no options
𝑛 2; 𝑛 8
𝑛 3; 𝑛 8, 7
𝑛 4; 𝑛 8, 7, 6
𝑛 5; 𝑛 8, 7, 6
𝑛 6; 𝑛 8, 7
𝑛 7; 𝑛 8
𝑛 8; 𝑛 has no options
Total 1 2 3 2 12
𝒏𝟑 𝟏𝟎 M1
𝑛 1; 𝑛 has no options
𝑛 2; 𝑛 9
𝑛 3; 𝑛 9, 8
𝑛 4; 𝑛 9, 8, 7
𝑛 5; 𝑛 9, 8, 7, 6
𝑛 6; 𝑛 9, 8, 7
𝑛 7; 𝑛 9, 8
𝑛 8; 𝑛 9
𝑛 0; 𝑛 has no options
𝒏𝟑 𝟐𝒏 M1
Total ways 1 ⋯ 𝑛 1 2 𝑛 1 (method mark may
be implicit) A1
𝑛 1
(7 marks)
(ii) Total number of pairs is
𝑁 1 𝑁 2 M1
Justification for using first part of question B1
𝑵 𝟐𝒏 𝟏
Prob A1 (AG)
𝑵 𝟐𝒏
Prob A1
(4 marks)
© UCLES 43 STEP MATHEMATICS 2 2019
STEP II 2019 Mark Scheme
(iii) 𝑛 1 𝑛 1
Prob ℙ largest rod is 2𝑛 1
2𝑛 1 2𝑛 1
M1 A1 (ft)
ℙ largest rod is 2𝑛
𝑛 1
2𝑛 1
6 M1 A1
2𝑀 1 2𝑀 2𝑀 1
1 𝑛 1
⋅ 2𝑛 2𝑛 1 2𝑛 1 2𝑛 2
2 2𝑛 1
(Use of formula for binomial coefficients with factorials cancelled)
3 M1
𝑛 1 2𝑛 1
𝑀 2𝑀 1 2𝑀 1
M1
Use of ∑ 𝑘 𝐾 𝐾 1 2𝐾 1 to simplify above
3 1 1 M1
𝑀 𝑀 1 2𝑀 1 3 𝑀 𝑀 1
𝑀 2𝑀 1 2𝑀 1 3 2
𝑀
1
4𝑀 3𝑀 1
2 2𝑀 1 2𝑀 1
4𝑀 1 𝑀 1
2 2𝑀 1 2𝑀 1
M1 A1
(9 marks)
© UCLES 44 STEP MATHEMATICS 2 2019
STEP II 2019 Mark Scheme
12 (i) 𝜇 𝑛𝑥 𝑑𝑥 M1 A1
𝔼 𝑋 𝑛𝑥 𝑑𝑥 M1
M1 A1
𝜎 (AG)
(5 marks)
(ii) √
LQ , UQ M1
√
IQR A1
√
2𝜎 B1
Squaring IQR and 2𝜎 M1
Comparing √3 with a rational number… M1
…by squaring both sides M1
Argument correct A1
(7 marks)
(iii) 𝑛 𝑛 1
1 𝑥 1 𝑛𝑥 𝑥 ⋯ A1
2
𝑛 𝑛 1 ⋯ 𝑛 𝑘 1
𝑥 ⋯ A1
𝑘!
/ /
LQ and Median B1
1 1 𝑛 2 M1
/
So 𝜇 A1
1 1 1 𝑛 1 𝑛 1
1 1 𝑛 ⋯ ⋯ M1
𝜇 𝑛 𝑛 2! 𝑛 𝑘! 𝑛
1 1 1
1 ⋯ ⋯ M1
1! 2! 𝑘!
4
/
So 𝜇 A1
(8 marks)
Cambridge Assessment
Admissions Testing
The Triangle Building
Shaftesbury Road
Cambridge
CB2 8EA
United Kingdom