Geotechnical Engineering Chapter 2
Geotechnical Engineering Chapter 2
Geotechnical Engineering Chapter 2
(SOIL MECHANICS)
Chapter 2: Engineering Soil Classification
TOPIC OUTLINE
1. Grain size classification
2. USDA
3. M.I.T
4. USCS
5. AASHTO
6. ASTM
Intended Learning Outcomes
4
Basis for Classification
5
Purpose
Classifying soils into groups with similar behavior, in terms
of simple indices, can provide geotechnical engineers a
general guidance about engineering properties of the soils
through the accumulated experience.
Communicate
between
engineers
· Main soil types are; Clay, Silt, Sand, Gravels, Boulders etc.
· Above types seldom exist separately in nature
· Natural soil deposits comprise mixture of above types in varying
proportions
· Soil classification means to arrange soil in groups and label them
based on their properties and behaviour.
· Soil Classification Systems have been developed by different
organizations
7
Classification Systems
8
USDA classification system
9
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
(MIT) Soil Classification System
• The classification system devised by Massachusetts
Institute of Technology, the USA for dividing soil into
different classes.
• In this classification, the particles larger than 200 mm
will be considered as boulders and larger 200 is cobble.
The gravel range from (60 mm to 2 mm) and sand
between (2.0 mm to 0.06) and silt range from (0.06 mm
to 0.002 mm). smaller than this is clay.
• Also, each type of soil subdivided to coarse, medium
and fine).
Unified Soil Classification System
(USCS) - ASTM D 2487
Origin of USCS:
This system was first developed by Professor A. Casagrande
(1948) for the purpose of airfield construction during World
War II. Afterwards, it was modified by Professor Casagrande,
the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, and the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers to enable the system to be applicable to dams,
foundations, and other construction (Holtz and Kovacs, 1981).
Four major divisions:
(1) Coarse-grained
(2) Fine-grained
(3) Organic soils
(4) Peat
11
Definition of Grain Size
No specific
grain size-use
Atterberg limits
12
General Guidance
50 %
Coarse-grained soils: Fine-grained soils:
Gravel Sand Silt Clay
50% NO. 4 NO.200
4.75 mm 0.075 mm
Atterberg limit
13
Symbols
15
Procedures for Classification
Coarse-grained
material
Grain size
distribution
Fine-grained
material
LL, PI
Highly
LL= 33
PI= 12
PI= 0.73(LL-20), A-line
PI=0.73(33-20)=9.49
SC
(15% gravel)
Clayey sand with Highly
gravel
(Santamarina et al., 2001)
17
Organic Soils
18
Borderline Cases (Dual Symbols)
For the following three conditions, a dual symbol should be
used.
· Coarse-grained soils with 5% - 12% fines.
About 7 % fines can change the hydraulic conductivity of the coarse-
grained media by orders of magnitude.
The first symbol indicates whether the coarse fraction is well or poorly
graded. The second symbol describe the contained fines. For example: SP-
SM, poorly graded sand with silt.
· Fine-grainedsoils with limits within the shaded zone. (PI
between 4 and 7 and LL between about 12 and 25).
It is hard to distinguish between the silty and more claylike materials.
CL-ML: Silty clay, SC-SM: Silty, clayed sand.
· Soil contain similar fines and coarse-grained fractions.
possible dual symbols GM-ML
19
Borderline Cases (Summary)
20
Group Symbols for Gravelly Soil
Major Division Laboratory Classification Criteria Group Symbol Typical Names
1 2 3 4 5
- No.200 < 5%; Cu ≥ 4 and 1 ≤ Cc ≤ GW Well-graded gravels, gravel-
3 sand mixtures with little or no
fines.
- No.200 > 5%; and not meeting GP Poorly-graded gravels, gravel-
both criteria for GW. sand mixtures with little or no
fines.
Coarse soil- Gravel-- - No.200 > 12%; Atterberg’s limits GM
Silty gravels, gravel-sand-silt
-More than More than plot below “A” line and plasticity
mixtures.
half of soil half of index less than 4.
is retained coarse soil
- No.200 > 12%; Atterberg’s limits GC
on No.200 is retained Clayey gravels, gravel-sand-clay
plot above “A” line and plasticity
sieve. on No.4 mixtures.
index greater than 7.
sieve
- No.200 > 12%; Atterberg’s limits GC-GM
Clayey-silty gravels, Gravel-silt-
fall in hatched area marked CL-ML.
clay mixtures.
- No.200 is 5-12%; and meets the GW-GM Well-graded gravels with silt,
criteria for GW and GM. Gravel-sand-silt mixtures.
- No.200 is 5-12%; and meets the GW-GC Well-graded gravels with clay
criteria for GW and GC. binder, Gravel-sand silt clay
mixtures.
- No.200 is 5-12%; and meets the GP-GM Poorly-graded gravels with silt,
criteria for GP and GM. Gravel-silt mixtures
- No.200 is 5-12%; and meets the GP-GC Poorly-graded gravels with clay,
criteria for GP and GC. Gravel-clay mixtures.
- No.200, means passing No.200 sieve
21
Table: Group Symbols for Sandy Soil
Group
Major Division Criteria for Classification Typical Names
Symbol
1 2 3 4 5
Coarse soil-- Sand-- - No.200 < 5%; Cu ≥ 6,and 1 ≤ Well-graded sands, gravelly
SW
More than More than Cc ≤ 3 sands with little or no fines.
half of soil is half of
- No.200 < 5%; and not meeting Poorly-graded sands, gravelly
retained on coarse soil SP
both criteria for SW. sands with little or no fines.
No.200 sieve. passes
No.4 sieve. - No.200 > 12%; Atterberg’s
limits plot below “A” line in the
SM Silty sands, sand-silt mixtures.
plasticity chart or plasticity index
less than 4.
- No.200 > 12%; Atterberg’s
limits plot above “A” line in the Clayey sands, sand-clay
SC
plasticity chart or plasticity index mixtures.
greater than 7.
- No.200 > 12%; Atterberg’s
limits fall in hatched area Clayey-silty sand, sand-silt-clay
SC-SM
marked CL-ML on the plasticity mixtures.
chart.
- No.200 is 5-12%; and meets Well-graded sand with silt,
SW-SM
the criteria for SW and SM. sand-silt mixtures.
- No.200 is 5-12%; and meets Well-graded sand with clay,
SW-SC
the criteria for SW and SC. sand-silt-clay mixtures.
- No.200 is 5-12%; and meets Poorly-graded sand with silt,
SP-SM
the criteria for SP and SM. sand-silt mixtures.
- No.200 is 5-12%; and meets Poorly-graded sand with clay,
SP-SC
the criteria for SP and SC. sand-clay mixtures.
4PI7 and lies on or CL-ML + No. 200<30% + No. 200<15% Silty clay
above
A-line + No. 200 15- %sand %gravel Silty clay with sand
29%
%sand <%gravel Silty clay with gravel
Liquid Limit
< 50 INORGANIC + No. 20030% %sand% Gravel <15% Sandy Silty clay
gravel
Gravel 15% Sandy Silty clay with
gravel
%sand<% Sand <15% Gravelly Silty clay
gravel
Sand 15% Gravelly Silty clay with
sand
PI<4 ML + No. 200<30% + No. 200<15% Silt
or lies below
A-Line + No. 200 15- %sand %gravel Silt with sand
29%
%sand <%gravel Silt with gravel
27
Range of plasticity & material %-age for organic soil (ASTM-1986)
Nature of Range of
Group symbol Range of material %age Group names
soil plasticity
ORGANIC P1<4 or lies + No. 20030% + No. 200<30% + No. 200<15% Organic clay
SOIL above
A-line + No. 200 15-29% %sand %gravel Organic clay with sand
Value as Value as
Value as
Subbase Base When
Subgrade When Potential Compressibility and Drainage
Symbol When Not Not Subject
Not Subject to Frost Action Expansion Characteristics
Subject to to Frost
Frost Action
Frost Action Action
None to very
GW Excellent Excellent Good Almost none Excellent
slight
Good to None to very
GP Good Fair to good Almost none Excellent
excellent slight
Good to Slight to
D Good Fair to good Very slight Fair to poor
excellent medium
GM
Poor to not Slight to Poor to practically
U Good Fair Slight
suitable medium impervious
None to very
SW Good Fair to good Poor Almost none Excellent
slight
Poor to not None to very
SP Fair to good Fair Almost none Excellent
suitable slight
29
Group symbols & their characteristics related to Roads & Airfields
Fair to Slight to
D Fair to good Poor Very slight Fair to poor
good high
SM
Slight to Poor to practically
U Fair Poor to fair Not suitable Slight to medium
high impervious
Slight to Poor to practically
SC Poor to fair Poor Not suitable Slight to medium
high impervious
Medium to
ML Poor to fair Not suitable Not suitable Slight to medium Fair to poor
very high
Medium to Practically
CL Poor to fair Not suitable Not suitable Medium
high impervious
Medium to
OL Poor Not suitable Not suitable Medium to high Poor
high
Medium to
MH Poor Not suitable Not suitable High Fair to poor
very high
Practically
CH Poor to fair Not suitable Not suitable Medium High
impervious
Poor to very Practically
OH Not suitable Not suitable Medium High
poor impervious
Pt Not suitable Not suitable Not suitable Slight Very high Fair to poor
30
DESCRIPTION OF USC-GROUPS
COARSE GRAINED SOIL
1. GW and SW groups:
• Well-graded gravelly and sandy soils with little or no fines (≤ 5%).
• Fines must not change the strength & free-draining characteristics
• In areas prone to frost action, they should not contain 3% of grains smaller than
0.02 mm.
2. GP and SP groups:
• Poorly graded gravels and sands with little or no fines.
• Poorly or Gap-graded materials are non-uniform mixtures of very
coarse material and very fine sands with intermediate sizes lacking.
3. GM and SM groups:
• Silty gravel & silty sand with fines (12%) of low or no plasticity.
• These lie below the “A” line on the plasticity chart.
• Both well and poorly-graded materials are included in these groups.
GMd and SMu groups:
Suffices “d” and “u” mean desirable and undesirable base materials
• This subdivision applies to roads and airfields only
• Subdivision is based on the liquid limit and plasticity index
• Suffix “d” is used when LL is 25 or less and the PI is 5 or less;
• Suffix “u” is used otherwise.
31
4. GC and SC groups:
• Gravelly or sandy soils with fines ( 12 %) that are more clay-like.
• The fines range in plasticity from low to high.
• The LL and PI of these groups plot above “A” line on plasticity chart.
• Both, well and poorly-graded soils are included in these groups.
1. ML and MH groups:
• Sandy silts, clayey silts, or inorganic silts with relatively low plasticity.
• Loess-type soils, rock flours, micaceous and diatomaceous soils are also included.
• Some types of kaolinite and illite clays also fall under these groups.
• Suffices L & M means low and high
• Micaceous and diatomaceous soils generally fall within the MH group but may extend
into the ML group when their LL is less than 50.
2. CL and CH groups:
• The CL and CH groups include clays with low and high liquid limits
• They are primarily inorganic clays.
• The medium and high plasticity clays are classified as CH and include fat clays, gumbo
clays, bentonite, and some volcanic clays.
• The low plasticity clays are classified as CL and usually include lean clays, sandy clays,
or silty clays.
32
3. OL and OH groups:
• These groups are characterized by the presence of organic matter.
• Organic silts and clays are included in these two groups, and they have a
plasticity range corresponding to the ML, and MH groups.
33
Table: Engineering use chart
IMPORTANT PROPERTIES
34
Table: Engineering use chart
CLAYEY SANDS, SC IMPERVIOUS GOOD TO FAIR LOW GOOD
POORLY GRADED
SAND-CLAY MIXTURES
INORGANIC SILTS AND ML SEMIPERVIOU FAIR MEDIUM FAIR
VERY FINE SANDS, S TO
ROCK FLOUR, SILTY OR IMPERVIOUS
CLAYEY FINE SANDS
WITH SLIGHT
PLASTICITY
INORGANIC CLAYS OF CL IMPERVIOUS FAIR MEDIUM GOOD TO FAIR
LOW TO MEDIUM CLAYS,
SANDY CLAYS SILTY
CLAYS, LEAN CLAYS
35
Table: Engineering use chart
GROUP
SYMBOL ROLLED EARTH DAMS CANAL SECTIONS FOUNDATIONS ROADWAYS
S
HOMOGENEOUS CORE SHELL EROSION COMPACTED SEEPAGE SEEPAGE FROST FROST HEAVE SURFACING
EMBANKMENT RESISTANCE EARTH LINING IMPORTANT NOT HEAVE NOT POSSIBLE
IMPORTANT POSSIBLE
GW -- -- 1 1 -- -- 1 1 1 3
GP -- -- 2 2 -- -- 3 3 3 --
GM 2 4 -- 4 4 1 4 4 9 5
GC 1 1 -- 3 1 2 6 5 5 1
SW -- -- 3 6 -- -- 2 2 2 4
IF
GRAVELLY
SP -- -- 4 7 -- -- 5 6 4 --
IF IF
GRAVELLY GRAVELLY
36
Table: Engineering use chart
SM 4 5 -- 8 5 3 7 8 10 6
IF EROSION
GRAVELLY CRITICAL
SC 3 2 -- 5 2 4 8 7 6 2
ML 6 6 -- -- 6 6 9 10 11 --
EROSION
CRITICAL
CL 5 3 -- 9 3 5 10 9 7 7
OL 8 8 -- -- 7 7 11 11 12 --
EROSION
CRITICAL
MH 9 9 -- -- -- 8 12 12 13 --
CH 7 7 -- 10 8 9 13 13 8 --
VOLUME
CHANGE
CRITICAL
OH 10 10 -- -- -- 10 14 14 14 --
PT -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
37
American Association of State
Highway and Transportation Officials
system (AASHTO)
Origin of AASHTO: (For road construction)
This system was originally developed by Hogentogler and
Terzaghi in 1929 as the Public Roads Classification System.
Afterwards, there are several revisions. The present AASHTO
(1978) system is primarily based on the version in 1945. (Holtz
and Kovacs, 1981)
38
Definition of Grain Size
No specific
grain size-use
Atterberg
limits
Boulders Gravel Sand Silt-Clay
Coarse Fine
75 mm No.4 No.200
4.75 mm 0.075
No.40 mm
0.425 mm
39
General Guidance
· 8 major groups: A1~ A7 (with several subgroups) and organic soils A8
· The required tests are sieve analysis and Atterberg limits.
· The group index, an empirical formula, is used to further evaluate soils
within a group (subgroups).
A1 ~ A3 A4 ~ A7
40
Group Index
The first term is determined by the LL
41
Classification
Das, 1998
42
Classification (Cont.)
Note:
The first group from the left to fit the test data is the Das, 1998
44
Example Problem
Sieve no. Opening % Passing LL = 23
4 4.75 100 PL = 19
10 2.00 90
20 0.850 64
40 0.425 38
80 0.180 18
200 0.075 13
By USCS
D10 =.4 CU=1.75/.4=4.375
D30 =1 CC=12/(1.75)(.4)=1.429
D60=1.75
R200=100-F200=100-3=97
R4 =100-94=6
R4/R200=0.062 SP=Poorly graded sand
2.)
Percent passing Sieve no.
90 10 PL=37
76 40
34 200 PI=12
By AASHTO
Ans.A-2-6(0)
GI=(F200-15)[0.2+0.005(LL-40)]+0.01(F200 -
15)(PI-10)
=0.01(34-15)(12-10)
=0.38 or 0
By USCS
R200=100-F200=100-34=66
R4=100-F4=0
F200<50=SANDS;SC-on A line
3.)Given; LL=23
Sieve no. Opening %passing PL=19
4 4.75 100 PI=LL-PL=4
10 2.00 90
20 .850 64
40 .425 38
D10=.0275
80 .180 18 D30=0.3
200 .075 13 D60=0.75
a.) CU=D60/D10=.75/.0275=27.27
CC=(D30)2/(D60)(D10)=(0.3)2/(0.75)(0.02575)=4.364
b.) AASHTO
GI=(F200-35) [0.2+0.005(LL-40)]+0.01(F200 -15)(PI-10)
= -2.41
A-1-b(0)
c.) USCS
R200=100-13=87
R4=100-F4=100-100=0
F200 <50=SANDS;SM-SC=Silty clayey sand
Thank you!!!
51