Technical Report No. Iv: Wing and Tail Geometry Selection: Name: Sky Trainers

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 75

TECHNICAL REPORT NO.

IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 01 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01
A. AIRFOIL SELECTION - ASYMMETRICAL AIRFOILS
GIVEN:
RN: 3891145.229
VCRUISE: 198 FT/S
CRUISING ALTITUDE: 11,000 FT
ASPECT RATIO: 7.6

AIRFOIL 1
NACA 23018

I. AIRFOIL COORDINATES IN PERCENT OF AIRFOIL CHORD

AIRFOIL STATION AND ORDINATE DATA

UPPER SURFACE LOWER SURFACE

1.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.9964 0.0009 0.0081 -0.0140

0.9856 0.0034 0.0222 -0.0253

0.9677 0.0075 0.0415 -0.0348

0.9430 0.0130 0.0655 -0.0430

0.9119 0.0198 0.0940 -0.0505

0.8748 0.0276 0.1276 -0.0575

0.8323 0.0362 0.1674 -0.0641

0.7850 0.0453 0.2140 -0.0695

0.7335 0.0547 0.2656 -0.0729

0.6786 0.0641 0.3207 -0.0742

0.6211 0.0732 0.3784 -0.0736

0.5619 0.0818 0.4379 -0.0712

0.5018 0.0895 0.4982 -0.0674

0.4416 0.0961 0.5586 -0.0623

0.3823 0.1011 0.6182 -0.0564

0.3247 0.1043 0.6760 -0.0498

0.2696 0.1054 0.7312 -0.0428

0.2179 0.1043 0.7831 -0.0357

0.1695 0.1008 0.8308 -0.0287

0.1238 0.0939 0.8737 -0.0220

0.0830 0.0830 0.9111 -0.0159

0.0491 0.0685 0.9424 -0.0105

0.0234 0.0515 0.9673 -0.0060

0.0068 0.0336 0.9854 -0.0027

-0.0008 0.0162 0.9963 -0.0007

0.0000 0.0000 1.0000 0.0000


TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 02 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

II. AIRFOIL DRAWING

NACA 23018

SCALE: 1:5
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 03 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

III. AIRFOIL DATA


A.) CL VS. CD PLOT (FROM THEORY OF WING SECTIONS BY ABBOTT)
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 04 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

B.) CL VS ALPHA & CM 0.25 VS ALPHA PLOTS (FROM THEORY OF WING SECTIONS
BY ABBOTT)
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 05 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

C.) CL VS. CD PLOT (FROM JAVAFOIL)

NACA 23018
C
l Re = 3891145, M = 0.1844268617, r = 2, AR = 7.6
1.5

1.0

0.5

C
0.0 d
0.000 0.040 0.080 0.120 0.160 0.200 0.240 0.280 0.320 0.360 0.400 0.440

-0.5

-1.0

-1.5
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 06 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

D.) CL VS ALPHA PLOT (FROM JAVAFOIL)

NACA 23018
AR = 7.6, RE = 3891145.229, M = 0.1844268617
Cl
1.5

1.0

0.5

a
0.0
-30.0 -20.0 -10.0 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0

-0.5

-1.0

-1.5
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 07 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

E.) CM 0.25 VS. ALPHA PLOT (FROM JAVAFOIL)

NACA 23018
AR = 7.6, RE = 3891145.229, M = 0.1844268617
C
0.2 m 0.25

0.1

a
0.0
-30.0 -20.0 -10.0 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0

-0.1

-0.2
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 8 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

AIRFOIL 2
NACA 23015
I. AIRFOIL COORDINATES IN PERCENT OF AIRFOIL CHORD

AIRFOIL STATION AND ORDINATE DATA


UPPER SURFACE LOWER SURFACE
1.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.9964 0.0005 0.0036 -0.0105
0.9855 0.0020 0.0145 -0.0203
0.9675 0.0045 0.0325 -0.0294
0.9427 0.0078 0.0573 -0.0376
0.9115 0.0119 0.0885 -0.0447
0.8743 0.0165 0.1257 -0.0505
0.8316 0.0216 0.1684 -0.0549
0.7840 0.0270 0.2160 -0.0579
0.7324 0.0325 0.2676 -0.0594
0.6773 0.0380 0.3227 -0.0595
0.6197 0.0432 0.3803 -0.0582
0.5603 0.0481 0.4397 -0.0558
0.5000 0.0523 0.5000 -0.0523
0.4397 0.0558 0.5603 -0.0481
0.3803 0.0582 0.6197 -0.0432
0.3227 0.0595 0.6773 -0.0380
0.2676 0.0594 0.7324 -0.0325
0.2160 0.0579 0.7840 -0.0270
0.1684 0.0549 0.8316 -0.0216
0.1257 0.0505 0.8743 -0.0165
0.0885 0.0447 0.9115 -0.0119
0.0573 0.0376 0.9427 -0.0078
0.0325 0.0294 0.9675 -0.0045
0.0145 0.0203 0.9855 -0.0020
0.0036 0.0105 0.9964 -0.0005
0.0000 0.0000 1.0000 0.0000
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 09 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

II. AIRFOIL DRAWING

NACA 23015

SCALE 1:5
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 10 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

III. AIRFOIL DATA


A.) CL VS. CD PLOT (FROM THEORY OF WING SECTIONS BY ABBOTT)
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 11 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

B.) CL VS ALPHA & CM 0.25 VS ALPHA PLOTS (FROM THEORY OF WING SECTIONS
BY ABBOTT)
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 12 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

C.) CL VS. CD PLOT (FROM JAVAFOIL)

NACA 23015
C
1.5 l Re = 3891145, M = 0.1844268617, r = 2, AR = 7.6

1.0

0.5

C
0.0 d
0.000 0.080 0.160 0.240 0.320 0.400 0.480 0.560

-0.5

-1.0
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 13 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

D.) CL VS ALPHA PLOT (FROM JAVAFOIL)

NACA 23015
AR = 7.6, RE = 3891145.229, M = 0.1844268617

1.5 Cl

1.0

0.5

0.0 a
-30.0 -20.0 -10.0 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0

-0.5

-1.0
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 14 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

E.) CM 0.25 VS. ALPHA PLOT (FROM JAVAFOIL)

NACA 23015
AR = 7.6, RE = 3891145.229, M = 0.1844268617

0.2 C m 0.25

0.1

0.0 a
-30.0 -20.0 -10.0 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0

-0.1

-0.2
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 15 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

AIRFOIL 3
NACA 0010-34
I. AIRFOIL COORDINATES IN PERCENT OF AIRFOIL CHORD

AIRFOIL STATION AND ORDINATE DATA


UPPER SURFACE LOWER SURFACE
1.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.9964 0.0009 0.0081 -0.0140
0.9856 0.0034 0.0222 -0.0253
0.9677 0.0075 0.0415 -0.0348
0.9430 0.0130 0.0655 -0.0430
0.9119 0.0198 0.0940 -0.0505
0.8748 0.0276 0.1276 -0.0575
0.8323 0.0362 0.1674 -0.0641
0.7850 0.0453 0.2140 -0.0695
0.7335 0.0547 0.2656 -0.0729
0.6786 0.0641 0.3207 -0.0742
0.6211 0.0732 0.3784 -0.0736
0.5619 0.0818 0.4379 -0.0712
0.5018 0.0895 0.4982 -0.0674
0.4416 0.0961 0.5586 -0.0623
0.3823 0.1011 0.6182 -0.0564
0.3247 0.1043 0.6760 -0.0498
0.2696 0.1054 0.7312 -0.0428
0.2179 0.1043 0.7831 -0.0357
0.1695 0.1008 0.8308 -0.0287
0.1238 0.0939 0.8737 -0.0220
0.0830 0.0830 0.9111 -0.0159
0.0491 0.0685 0.9424 -0.0105
0.0234 0.0515 0.9673 -0.0060
0.0068 0.0336 0.9854 -0.0027
-0.0008 0.0162 0.9963 -0.0007
0.0000 0.0000 1.0000 0.0000
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 16 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

II. AIRFOIL DRAWING

NACA 2412

SCALE: 1:5
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 17 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

III. AIRFOIL DATA


A.) CL VS. CD PLOT (FROM THEORY OF WING SECTIONS BY ABBOTT)
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 18 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

B.) CL VS ALPHA & CM 0.25 VS ALPHA PLOTS (FROM THEORY OF WING SECTIONS
BY ABBOTT)
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 19 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

C.) CL VS. CD PLOT (FROM JAVAFOIL)

NACA 2412
C Re = 3891145, M = 0.1844268617, r = 2, AR = 7.6
1.5 l

1.0

0.5

C
0.0 d
0.000 0.080 0.160 0.240 0.320 0.400 0.480 0.560

-0.5

-1.0
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 20 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

D.) CL VS ALPHA PLOT (FROM JAVAFOIL)

NACA 2412
Re = 3891145, M = 0.1844268617, r = 2, AR = 7.6
Cl
1.5

1.0

0.5

a
0.0
-30.0 -20.0 -10.0 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0

-0.5

-1.0
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 21 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

E.) CM 0.25 VS. ALPHA PLOT (FROM JAVAFOIL)

NACA 2412
Re = 3891145, M = 0.1844268617, r = 2, AR = 7.6
C
m 0.25
0.2

0.1

a
0.0
-30.0 -20.0 -10.0 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0

-0.1

-0.2
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 22 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

AIRFOIL 4
NACA 2418

I. AIRFOIL COORDINATES IN PERCENT OF AIRFOIL CHORD

AIRFOIL STATION AND ORDINATE DATA


UPPER SURFACE LOWER SURFACE
1.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.9965 0.0010 0.0052 -0.0153
0.9858 0.0040 0.0175 -0.0289
0.9680 0.0089 0.0365 -0.0408
0.9435 0.0154 0.0621 -0.0508
0.9126 0.0233 0.0937 -0.0589
0.8756 0.0323 0.1309 -0.0650
0.8332 0.0420 0.1732 -0.0690
0.7858 0.0523 0.2200 -0.0710
0.7342 0.0626 0.2706 -0.0713
0.6791 0.0726 0.3244 -0.0700
0.6213 0.0821 0.3808 -0.0674
0.5616 0.0906 0.4394 -0.0637
0.5009 0.0979 0.4991 -0.0590
0.4401 0.1036 0.5590 -0.0535
0.3799 0.1073 0.6180 -0.0475
0.3210 0.1085 0.6755 -0.0412
0.2647 0.1069 0.7305 -0.0349
0.2120 0.1026 0.7822 -0.0287
0.1637 0.0956 0.8299 -0.0227
0.1205 0.0862 0.8729 -0.0173
0.0833 0.0747 0.9104 -0.0123
0.0525 0.0615 0.9419 -0.0081
0.0285 0.0470 0.9670 -0.0046
0.0116 0.0318 0.9852 -0.0021
0.0021 0.0160 0.9962 -0.0005
0.0000 0.0000 1.0000 0.0000
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 23 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

II. AIRFOIL DRAWING

NACA 2418
SCALE 1:5
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 24 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

III. AIRFOIL DATA


A.) CL VS. CD PLOT (FROM THEORY OF WING SECTIONS BY ABBOTT)
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 25 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

B.) CL VS ALPHA & CM 0.25 VS ALPHA PLOTS (FROM THEORY OF WING SECTIONS
BY ABBOTT)
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 26 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

C.) CL VS. CD PLOT (FROM JAVAFOIL)

NACA 2418
Re = 3891145, M = 0.1844268617, r = 2, AR = 7.6
1.5
C
l

1.0

0.5

0.0 Cd
0.000 0.080 0.160 0.240 0.320 0.400 0.480

-0.5

-1.0

-1.5
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 27 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

D.) CL VS ALPHA PLOT (FROM JAVAFOIL)

NACA 2418
Re = 3891145, M = 0.1844268617, r = 2, AR = 7.6

1.5
Cl

1.0

0.5

0.0 a
-30.0 -20.0 -10.0 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0

-0.5

-1.0

-1.5
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 28 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

E.) CM 0.25 VS. ALPHA PLOT (FROM JAVAFOIL)

NACA 2418
Re = 3891145, M = 0.1844268617, r = 2, AR = 7.6

0.2
Cm 0.25

0.1

0.0 a
-30.0 -20.0 -10.0 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0

-0.1

-0.2
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 29 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

AIRFOIL 5
NACA 2415
I. AIRFOIL COORDINATES IN PERCENT OF AIRFOIL CHORD

AIRFOIL STATION AND ORDINATE DATA


UPPER SURFACE LOWER SURFACE
1.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.9965 0.0009 0.0049 -0.0127
0.9857 0.0035 0.0170 -0.0238
0.9680 0.0077 0.0359 -0.0335
0.9434 0.0134 0.0613 -0.0415
0.9124 0.0203 0.0929 -0.0478
0.8754 0.0281 0.1301 -0.0524
0.8329 0.0366 0.1724 -0.0553
0.7855 0.0455 0.2193 -0.0566
0.7339 0.0545 0.2701 -0.0564
0.6788 0.0632 0.3241 -0.0551
0.6210 0.0713 0.3807 -0.0528
0.5614 0.0786 0.4394 -0.0498
0.5007 0.0848 0.4993 -0.0459
0.4400 0.0896 0.5592 -0.0415
0.3800 0.0927 0.6183 -0.0367
0.3213 0.0936 0.6758 -0.0317
0.2652 0.0921 0.7308 -0.0267
0.2126 0.0881 0.7825 -0.0219
0.1645 0.0819 0.8302 -0.0173
0.1214 0.0736 0.8731 -0.0131
0.0842 0.0635 0.9106 -0.0094
0.0533 0.0521 0.9420 -0.0061
0.0291 0.0397 0.9671 -0.0035
0.0121 0.0267 0.9852 -0.0016
0.0024 0.0134 0.9962 -0.0004
0.0000 0.0000 1.0000 0.0000
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 30 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

II. AIRFOIL DRAWING

NACA 2415

SCALE: 1:5
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 31 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

III. AIRFOIL DATA


A.) CL VS. CD PLOT (FROM THEORY OF WING SECTIONS BY ABBOTT)
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 32 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

B.) CL VS ALPHA & CM 0.25 VS ALPHA PLOTS (FROM THEORY OF WING SECTIONS
BY ABBOTT)
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 33 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

C.) CL VS. CD PLOT (FROM JAVAFOIL)

NACA 2415
Re = 3891145, M = 0.1844268617, r = 2, AR = 7.6
C
1.5 l

1.0

0.5

C
0.0 d
0.000 0.080 0.160 0.240 0.320 0.400 0.480

-0.5

-1.0
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 34 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

D.) CL VS ALPHA PLOT (FROM JAVAFOIL)

NACA 2415
Re = 3891145, M = 0.1844268617, r = 2, AR = 7.6

1.5 Cl

1.0

0.5

a
0.0
-30.0 -20.0 -10.0 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0

-0.5

-1.0
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 35 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

E.) CM 0.25 VS. ALPHA PLOT (FROM JAVAFOIL)

NACA 2415
Re = 3891145, M = 0.1844268617, r = 2, AR = 7.6

C
0.2 m 0.25

0.1

a
0.0
-30.0 -20.0 -10.0 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0

-0.1

-0.2
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 36 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

IV. AIRFOIL COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS FOR ASYMMETRICAL AIRFOILS


STALLING Cl/Cd AT
AIRFOIL t/c ClMAX AOA CdMIN ClMAX

NACA 23018 0.1800 1.3460 17.0000 0.0082 8.5650

NACA 23015 0.1500 1.2050 14.0000 0.0081 11.1450

NACA 2412 0.1200 1.1130 12.0000 0.0095 14.0960

NACA 2418 0.1800 1.4150 16.0000 0.0087 10.3160

NACA 2415 0.1500 1.2630 14.0000 0.0088 12.0840

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS FOR ASYMMETRICAL AIRFOILS

Cl AT AOA AT
AIRFOIL CmAC (Cl/Cd)MAX (Cl/Cd)MAX (Cl/Cd)MAX x/c y/c

NACA 23018 -0.0050 0.3280 26.7150 2.0000 0.2360 0.0190

NACA 23015 -0.0050 0.3200 24.3770 2.0000 0.2310 0.0500

NACA 2412 -0.0330 0.4060 24.3010 2.0000 0.2390 0.0060

NACA 2418 -0.0330 0.5280 20.9280 3.0000 0.2390 0.0440

NACA 2415 -0.0330 0.6130 24.3970 4.0000 0.2410 0.0140


TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 37 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

V. AIRFOIL SELECTION AND JUSTIFICATION

THE DESIGNERS USED THE MATRIX ABOVE TO DETERMINE WHICH


AIRFOIL IS THE MOST APPROPRIATE FOR THE WING SECTION OF THE
AIRCRAFT. THE APPROACH CHOSEN BY THE DESIGNERS WAS TO RANK ALL OF
THE AIRFOILS BASED ON THE DIFFERENT PARAMETERS SHOWN ABOVE, AND
THEN THE AIRFOIL THAT RANKS THE HIGHEST OVERALL WAS CHOSEN. IN
CONCLUSION, THE NACA 23018 AIRFOIL WAS CHOSEN SINCE IT HAD THE MOST
DESIRABLE TRAITS AMONG ALL OF THE AIRFOILS. FIRST, IT WAS THE THICKEST
AIRFOIL, BUT ALSO HAD RELATIVELY LOWER DRAG THAN THE OTHERS. A
THICKER AIRFOIL IS FAVORED SINCE IT HAS SMOOTHER STALLING
CHARACTERISTICS; GRADUAL LOSS IN LIFT AND MINIMAL CHANGE IN
PITCHING MOMENT. ADDITIONALLY, THIS REDUCTION IN STALLING EFFECTS
PROMOTES SAFETY IN FLIGHT. FURTHERMORE, THE THICKER PROFILE ALLOWS
FOR MORE WING SPACE, WHICH GIVES MORE ROOM FOR STRUCTURAL
MEMBERS INSIDE THE WING. MORE WING SPACE ALSO ALLOWS OPTIMIZATION
OF THE WING FLIGHT CONTROLS AND ADDS MORE SPACE FOR FUEL. THE HIGH
THICKNESS RATIO ALSO MEANS THAT THE WING STRUCTURAL WEIGHT IS
REDUCED. NEXT, THE NACA 23018 AIRFOIL HAD THE HIGHEST STALLING ANGLE
OF ATTACK WHICH MEANS THAT THE AIRFOIL TAKES LONGER TO STALL. IT
ALSO HAS THE BEST L/DMAX WHICH DENOTES THAT THE AIRFOIL HAS THE BEST
PERFORMANCE FOR RANGE OPTIMIZATION. IN ORDER TO REACH THIS L/DMAX,
THE AIRCRAFT DOES NOT NEED TO FLY AT A HIGH ANGLE OF ATTACK, WHICH IS
BENEFICIAL FOR THE AIRCRAFT SINCE IT REQUIRES LESS FUEL CONSUMPTION.
FINALLY, ITS LOW PITCHING MOMENT COEFFICIENT ALSO SHOWS THAT THE
NACA 23018 HAS GOOD LONGITUDINAL STABILITY AND THUS, BETTER
PITCHING. ONE FACTOR THAT THE DESIGNERS NOTICED IS THAT THE DESIGN
LIFT COEFFICIENT IS LOWER COMPARED TO THE OTHER AIRFOILS. HOWEVER,
IT WAS ANALYZED THAT THE BENEFITS OF THE NACA 23018 AIRFOIL
OUTWEIGH THE MINOR DISADVANTAGES CONNECTED WITH IT, AND IT IS THE
MOST APPROPRIATE WING FOR THE TRAINER AIRCRAFT.
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 38 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

A. AIRFOIL SELECTION - SYMMETRICAL AIRFOILS


GIVEN:
RN: 3891145.229
VCRUISE: 198 FT/S
CRUISING ALTITUDE: 11,000 FT
ASPECT RATIO: 3.0

AIRFOIL 1
NACA 0006

I. AIRFOIL COORDINATES IN PERCENT OF AIRFOIL CHORD

AIRFOIL STATION AND ORDINATE DATA

UPPER SURFACE LOWER SURFACE


1.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.9964 0.0003 0.0036 -0.0052
0.9855 0.0010 0.0145 -0.0102
0.9675 0.0023 0.0325 -0.0147
0.9427 0.0039 0.0573 -0.0188
0.9115 0.0059 0.0885 -0.0223
0.8743 0.0083 0.1257 -0.0252
0.8316 0.0108 0.1684 -0.0275
0.7840 0.0135 0.2160 -0.0290
0.7324 0.0162 0.2676 -0.0297
0.6773 0.0190 0.3227 -0.0297
0.6197 0.0216 0.3803 -0.0291
0.5603 0.0240 0.4397 -0.0279
0.5000 0.0262 0.5000 -0.0262
0.4397 0.0279 0.5603 -0.0240
0.3803 0.0291 0.6197 -0.0216
0.3227 0.0297 0.6773 -0.0190
0.2676 0.0297 0.7324 -0.0162
0.2160 0.0290 0.7840 -0.0135
0.1684 0.0275 0.8316 -0.0108
0.1257 0.0252 0.8743 -0.0083
0.0885 0.0223 0.9115 -0.0059
0.0573 0.0188 0.9427 -0.0039
0.0325 0.0147 0.9675 -0.0023
0.0145 0.0102 0.9855 -0.0010
0.0036 0.0052 0.9964 -0.0003
0.0000 0.0000 1.0000 0.0000
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 39 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

II. AIRFOIL DRAWING

NACA 0006

SCALE 1:5
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 40 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

III. AIRFOIL DATA


A.) CL VS. CD PLOT (FROM THEORY OF WING SECTIONS BY ABBOTT)
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 41 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

B.) CL VS ALPHA & CM 0.25 VS ALPHA PLOTS (FROM THEORY OF WING SECTIONS
BY ABBOTT)
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 42 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

C.) CL VS. CD PLOT (FROM JAVAFOIL)

NACA 0006

C Re = 3891145, M = 0.1844268617, r = 2, AR = 3
1.0 l

0.5

C
0.0 d
0.000 0.080 0.160 0.240 0.320 0.400 0.480

-0.5
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 43 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

D.) CL VS ALPHA PLOT (FROM JAVAFOIL)

NACA 0006
AR = 3.0, RE = 3891145.229, M = 0.1844268617

1.0 Cl

0.5

a
0.0
-30.0 -20.0 -10.0 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0

-0.5
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 44 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

E.) CM 0.25 VS. ALPHA PLOT (FROM JAVAFOIL)

NACA 0006
AR = 3.0, RE = 3891145.229, M = 0.1844268617
C
0.2 m 0.25

0.1

a
0.0
-30.0 -20.0 -10.0 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0

-0.1

-0.2
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 45 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

AIRFOIL 2
NACA 0012
I. AIRFOIL COORDINATES IN PERCENT OF AIRFOIL CHORD

AIRFOIL STATION AND ORDINATE DATA


UPPER SURFACE LOWER SURFACE
1.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.9964 0.0007 0.0074 -0.0115
0.9856 0.0029 0.0210 -0.0204
0.9677 0.0064 0.0400 -0.0276
0.9430 0.0111 0.0641 -0.0337
0.9119 0.0168 0.0931 -0.0394
0.8747 0.0235 0.1273 -0.0449
0.8322 0.0308 0.1675 -0.0503
0.7848 0.0385 0.2144 -0.0550
0.7333 0.0465 0.2660 -0.0580
0.6784 0.0546 0.3210 -0.0593
0.6209 0.0624 0.3787 -0.0590
0.5616 0.0698 0.4382 -0.0573
0.5015 0.0765 0.4985 -0.0543
0.4413 0.0821 0.5589 -0.0503
0.3820 0.0865 0.6184 -0.0456
0.3244 0.0894 0.6762 -0.0403
0.2693 0.0905 0.7314 -0.0347
0.2176 0.0898 0.7833 -0.0289
0.1693 0.0870 0.8309 -0.0233
0.1242 0.0813 0.8738 -0.0179
0.0839 0.0719 0.9111 -0.0129
0.0504 0.0592 0.9425 -0.0085
0.0249 0.0443 0.9673 -0.0049
0.0081 0.0287 0.9854 -0.0022
-0.0001 0.0137 0.9963 -0.0006
0.0000 0.0000 1.0000 0.0000
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 46 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

II. AIRFOIL DRAWING

NACA 0012

SCALE 1:5
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 47 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

III. AIRFOIL DATA


A.) CL VS. CD PLOT (FROM THEORY OF WING SECTIONS BY ABBOTT)
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 48 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

B.) CL VS ALPHA & CM 0.25 VS ALPHA PLOTS (FROM THEORY OF WING SECTIONS
BY ABBOTT)
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 49 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

C.) CL VS. CD PLOT (FROM JAVAFOIL)

NACA 0012
Re = 3891145, M = 0.1844268617, r = 2, AR = 3
1.0 C l

0.5

C
0.0 d
0.000 0.080 0.160 0.240 0.320 0.400 0.480 0.560

-0.5

-1.0
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 50 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

D.) CL VS ALPHA PLOT (FROM JAVAFOIL)

NACA 0012
AR = 3, RE = 3891145.229, M = 0.1844268617
1.0 Cl

0.5

0.0 a
-30.0 -20.0 -10.0 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0

-0.5

-1.0
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 51 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

E.) CM 0.25 VS. ALPHA PLOT (FROM JAVAFOIL)

NACA 0012
AR = 3, RE = 3891145.229, M = 0.1844268617

0.2 Cm 0.25

0.1

0.0 a
-30.0 -20.0 -10.0 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0

-0.1

-0.2
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 52 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

AIRFOIL 3
NACA 0010-34
I. AIRFOIL COORDINATES IN PERCENT OF AIRFOIL CHORD

AIRFOIL STATION AND ORDINATE DATA


UPPER SURFACE LOWER SURFACE
1.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.9964 0.0003 0.0036 -0.0052
0.9855 0.0010 0.0145 -0.0102
0.9675 0.0023 0.0325 -0.0147
0.9427 0.0039 0.0573 -0.0188
0.9115 0.0059 0.0885 -0.0223
0.8743 0.0083 0.1257 -0.0252
0.8316 0.0108 0.1684 -0.0275
0.7840 0.0135 0.2160 -0.0290
0.7324 0.0162 0.2676 -0.0297
0.6773 0.0190 0.3227 -0.0297
0.6197 0.0216 0.3803 -0.0291
0.5603 0.0240 0.4397 -0.0279
0.5000 0.0262 0.5000 -0.0262
0.4397 0.0279 0.5603 -0.0240
0.3803 0.0291 0.6197 -0.0216
0.3227 0.0297 0.6773 -0.0190
0.2676 0.0297 0.7324 -0.0162
0.2160 0.0290 0.7840 -0.0135
0.1684 0.0275 0.8316 -0.0108
0.1257 0.0252 0.8743 -0.0083
0.0885 0.0223 0.9115 -0.0059
0.0573 0.0188 0.9427 -0.0039
0.0325 0.0147 0.9675 -0.0023
0.0145 0.0102 0.9855 -0.0010
0.0036 0.0052 0.9964 -0.0003
0.0000 0.0000 1.0000 0.0000
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 53 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

II. AIRFOIL DRAWING

NACA 0010-34

SCALE: 1:5
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 54 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

III. AIRFOIL DATA


A.) CL VS. CD PLOT (FROM THEORY OF WING SECTIONS BY ABBOTT)
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 55 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

B.) CL VS ALPHA & CM 0.25 VS ALPHA PLOTS (FROM THEORY OF WING SECTIONS
BY ABBOTT)
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 56 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

C.) CL VS. CD PLOT (FROM JAVAFOIL)

NACA 0010-34
C Re = 3891145, M = 0.1844268617, r = 2, AR = 3
1.0 l

0.5

C
0.0 d
0.000 0.040 0.080 0.120 0.160 0.200 0.240 0.280 0.320 0.360 0.400 0.440

-0.5
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 57 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

D.) CL VS ALPHA PLOT (FROM JAVAFOIL)

NACA 0010-34
Re = 3891145, M = 0.1844268617, r = 2, AR = 3
1.0 Cl

0.5

a
0.0
-30.0 -20.0 -10.0 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0

-0.5
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 58 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

E.) CM 0.25 VS. ALPHA PLOT (FROM JAVAFOIL)

NACA 0010-34
Re = 3891145, M = 0.1844268617, r = 2, AR = 3
C
m 0.25
0.2

0.1

a
0.0
-30.0 -20.0 -10.0 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0

-0.1

-0.2
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 59 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

AIRFOIL 4
NACA 0009

I. AIRFOIL COORDINATES IN PERCENT OF AIRFOIL CHORD

AIRFOIL STATION AND ORDINATE DATA


UPPER SURFACE LOWER SURFACE
1.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.9964 0.0004 0.0036 -0.0079
0.9855 0.0015 0.0145 -0.0152
0.9675 0.0034 0.0325 -0.0220
0.9427 0.0059 0.0573 -0.0282
0.9115 0.0089 0.0885 -0.0335
0.8743 0.0124 0.1257 -0.0379
0.8316 0.0162 0.1684 -0.0412
0.7840 0.0202 0.2160 -0.0434
0.7324 0.0244 0.2676 -0.0446
0.6773 0.0285 0.3227 -0.0446
0.6197 0.0324 0.3803 -0.0437
0.5603 0.0360 0.4397 -0.0418
0.5000 0.0392 0.5000 -0.0392
0.4397 0.0418 0.5603 -0.0360
0.3803 0.0437 0.6197 -0.0324
0.3227 0.0446 0.6773 -0.0285
0.2676 0.0446 0.7324 -0.0244
0.2160 0.0434 0.7840 -0.0202
0.1684 0.0412 0.8316 -0.0162
0.1257 0.0379 0.8743 -0.0124
0.0885 0.0335 0.9115 -0.0089
0.0573 0.0282 0.9427 -0.0059
0.0325 0.0220 0.9675 -0.0034
0.0145 0.0152 0.9855 -0.0015
0.0036 0.0079 0.9964 -0.0004
0.0000 0.0000 1.0000 0.0000
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 60 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

II. AIRFOIL DRAWING

NACA 0009
SCALE 1:5
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 61 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

III. AIRFOIL DATA


A.) CL VS. CD PLOT (FROM THEORY OF WING SECTIONS BY ABBOTT)
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 62 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

B.) CL VS ALPHA & CM 0.25 VS ALPHA PLOTS (FROM THEORY OF WING SECTIONS
BY ABBOTT)
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 63 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

C.) CL VS. CD PLOT (FROM JAVAFOIL)

NACA 0009
Re = 3891145, M = 0.1844268617, r = 2, AR = 3
1.0
C
l

0.5

0.0 Cd
0.000 0.080 0.160 0.240 0.320 0.400 0.480

-0.5

-1.0
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 64 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

D.) CL VS ALPHA PLOT (FROM JAVAFOIL)

NACA 0009
Re = 3891145, M = 0.1844268617, r = 2, AR = 3
1.0
Cl

0.5

0.0 a
-30.0 -20.0 -10.0 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0

-0.5

-1.0
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 65 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

E.) CM 0.25 VS. ALPHA PLOT (FROM JAVAFOIL)

NACA 0009
Re = 3891145, M = 0.1844268617, r = 2, AR = 3
0.2
Cm 0.25

0.1

a
0.0
-30.0 -20.0 -10.0 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0

-0.1

-0.2
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 66 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

AIRFOIL 5
NACA 0010-35
I. AIRFOIL COORDINATES IN PERCENT OF AIRFOIL CHORD

AIRFOIL STATION AND ORDINATE DATA


UPPER SURFACE LOWER SURFACE
1.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.9964 0.0008 0.0036 -0.0048
0.9855 0.0033 0.0145 -0.0098
0.9675 0.0072 0.0325 -0.0149
0.9427 0.0123 0.0573 -0.0201
0.9115 0.0181 0.0885 -0.0252
0.8743 0.0242 0.1257 -0.0302
0.8316 0.0303 0.1684 -0.0349
0.7840 0.0359 0.2160 -0.0391
0.7324 0.0408 0.2676 -0.0427
0.6773 0.0446 0.3227 -0.0457
0.6197 0.0474 0.3803 -0.0478
0.5603 0.0490 0.4397 -0.0491
0.5000 0.0495 0.5000 -0.0495
0.4397 0.0491 0.5603 -0.0490
0.3803 0.0478 0.6197 -0.0474
0.3227 0.0457 0.6773 -0.0446
0.2676 0.0427 0.7324 -0.0408
0.2160 0.0391 0.7840 -0.0359
0.1684 0.0349 0.8316 -0.0303
0.1257 0.0302 0.8743 -0.0242
0.0885 0.0252 0.9115 -0.0181
0.0573 0.0201 0.9427 -0.0123
0.0325 0.0149 0.9675 -0.0072
0.0145 0.0098 0.9855 -0.0033
0.0036 0.0048 0.9964 -0.0008
0.0000 0.0000 1.0000 0.0000
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 67 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

II. AIRFOIL DRAWING

NACA 0010-35

SCALE: 1:5
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 68 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

III. AIRFOIL DATA


A.) CL VS. CD PLOT (FROM THEORY OF WING SECTIONS BY ABBOTT)
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 69 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

B.) CL VS ALPHA & CM 0.25 VS ALPHA PLOTS (FROM THEORY OF WING SECTIONS
BY ABBOTT)
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 70 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

C.) CL VS. CD PLOT (FROM JAVAFOIL)

NACA 0010-35
Re = 3891145, M = 0.1844268617, r = 2, AR = 3

C
1.0 l

0.5

C
0.0 d
0.000 0.040 0.080 0.120 0.160 0.200 0.240 0.280 0.320 0.360 0.400

-0.5
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 71 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

D.) CL VS ALPHA PLOT (FROM JAVAFOIL)

NACA 0010-35
Re = 3891145, M = 0.1844268617, r = 2, AR = 3

Cl
1.0

0.5

a
0.0
-30.0 -20.0 -10.0 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0

-0.5
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 72 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

E.) CM 0.25 VS. ALPHA PLOT (FROM JAVAFOIL)

NACA 0010-35
Re = 3891145, M = 0.1844268617, r = 2, AR = 3

C
0.2 m 0.25

0.1

a
0.0
-30.0 -20.0 -10.0 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0

-0.1

-0.2
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 73 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

IV. AIRFOIL COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS FOR SYMMETRICAL AIRFOILS


STALLING
AIRFOIL t/c ClMAX AOA ClMIN Cl/Cd AT ClMAX

NACA 0006 0.0600 0.3770 7.0000 0.0100 13.3370

NACA 0012 0.1200 0.6200 12.0000 0.0105 9.4060

NACA
0010-34 0.1000 0.3840 7.0000 0.0103 13.9500

NACA 0009 0.0900 0.5220 10.0000 0.0102 11.0110

NACA
0010-35 0.1000 0.3500 6.0000 0.0079 15.0840

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS FOR SYMMETRICAL AIRFOILS

Cl AT AOA AT
AIRFOIL CmAC (Cl/Cd)MAX (Cl/Cd)MAX (Cl/Cd)MAX x/c y/c

NACA 0006 0.0000 0.2990 14.2900 5.0000 0.2500 0.0000

NACA 0012 0.0000 0.2610 15.2040 4.0000 0.2500 0.0000

NACA
0010-34 0.0000 0.3110 14.9360 5.0000 0.2450 -0.0800

NACA 0009 0.0000 0.3700 14.5540 6.0000 0.2500 0.0000

NACA
0010-35 0.0000 0.2520 16.4240 4.0000 0.2050 0.0300
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 74 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

V. AIRFOIL SELECTION AND JUSTIFICATION

SIMILAR TO THE SELECTION OF THE WING AIRFOIL, THE DESIGNERS


USED THE MATRIX ABOVE TO DETERMINE WHICH AIRFOIL IS THE MOST
APPROPRIATE FOR THE HORIZONTAL TAIL SECTION OF THE AIRCRAFT. AGAIN,
THE APPROACH CHOSEN BY THE DESIGNERS WAS TO RANK ALL OF THE
AIRFOILS BASED ON THE DIFFERENT PARAMETERS SHOWN ABOVE, AND THEN
THE AIRFOIL THAT RANKS THE HIGHEST OVERALL WAS CHOSEN. IN
CONCLUSION, THE NACA 0009 AIRFOIL WAS CHOSEN SINCE ITS
CHARACTERISTICS WERE THE MOST APPROPRIATE TO USE FOR THE TAIL
SECTION. FIRST, IT HAS A LOW THICKNESS RATIO WHICH IS RECOMMENDED
FOR THE TAIL SECTION SINCE HAVING A LOW THICKNESS RATIO DELAYS
STALLING EFFECTS AND AT THE SAME TIME, ALSO INCREASE CLMAX BY
ALLOWING THE FORMATION OF VORTICES JUST BEHIND THE LEADING EDGE. IT
ALSO HAS A HIGH STALLING ANGLE OF ATTACK, WHICH MAKES THE AIRCRAFT
LESS PRONE TO STALLING. AS A RESULT OF THE LOWER THICKNESS RATIO, THE
DRAG IS ALSO RELATIVELY LOW. THE MATRIX MIGHT SHOW THAT THE CDMIN IS
RANKED LOWER, BUT ITS DIFFERENCE IN VALUE WITH THE OTHER AIRFOILS
ARE VERY SMALL. THE NACA 0009 ALSO HAS A HIGH DESIGN LIFT COEFFICIENT.
AS AN ADDITIONAL EFFECT OF A LOWER THICKNESS RATIO, THE STRUCTURAL
WEIGHT IS ALSO HIGHER. SINCE THE DRAG PRODUCED BY THE HORIZONTAL
TAIL IS SIGNIFICANTLY LOWER THAN THAT OF THE WING, THIS FACTOR MAY
BE DISREGARDED. IN FACT, THE ADDED STRUCTURAL WEIGHT ALSO MEANS
THAT THERE IS ADDED STRENGTH FOR THE HORIZONTAL TAIL.
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. IV: WING
NAME: SKY TRAINERS
AND TAIL GEOMETRY SELECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 06, 2021 PAGE NO.: 75 OF 75
INSTRUCTOR: ENGR. EDWARD BAUTISTA
RATING: ISSUE NO.: 01

B. GEOMETRY SELECTION

I. WING

ASPECT RATIO (AR): 7.6

TAPER RATIO: 0.45

AIRFOIL SELECTION, ROOT: NACA 23018

TIP: NACA 23018

II. VERTICAL TAIL

ASPECT RATIO (AR): 2.0

TAPER RATIO: 0.45

AIRFOIL SELECTION, ROOT: NACA 0009

TIP: NACA 0009

III. HORIZONTAL TAIL

ASPECT RATIO (AR): 3.0

TAPER RATIO: 0.45

AIRFOIL SELECTION, ROOT: NACA 0009

TIP: NACA 0009

You might also like