CIPP Evaluation Model

1ST PAGE
Good morning sir, good morning classmates. before I start my report I want to introduce
myself, I am Reynalyn S. Gozun, the last reporter in group 7.
2nd page
I am going to discuss the CIPP Model
3rd page
So what is CIPP Evaluation Model
The CIPP Evaluation Model was developed by Daniel L. Stufflebeam in 1966, and further
updated throughout the years, with the latest update in 2002. This considered as decision
oriented model that systematically collect information about the program to identify
strength and limitations in content and delivery to improve program effectiveness or plan
for the future of a program. This Evaluation Model is a comprehensive framework for
guiding evaluations of programmes, projects, personnel, products, institutions, and
systems. Users of this program are often focusing in management oriented evaluation as
this framework is combined with four stages of evaluation. The Focus is continuous
improvement by concentrating on 4 areas of program
4TH PAGE
CIPP stands for Context (which means the overall goals or mission), Input (is the plans
and resources), Process (is the activities and components), Product (is the outcomes
or ojectives), and these 4 main aspects comprise the CIPP Evaluation Model. (Although
this model has since then been expanded to CIPPOI where last two stand for OUTCOME
and IMPACT RESPECTIVELY)
5th page
The intention of this model is not to prove, but rather, to improve upon the programme
itself. The CIPP Evaluation Model may be applied to educational / training programmes, to
best determine the merit and worth of the training programme, as well as to determine
how to improve upon it.
The CIPP systematizes the way to evaluate the different dimensions and aspects of
curriculum development and the sum total of student experiences in the educative process.
Ang model na ito is nagrerequire ng mga stakeholders na maging involved doon sa
evaluation process. Sa approach na ito, the user is asked kung saan sa pamamagitan ng mga
series of questions in the context, inputs, process and product stages.
6th and 7th page:

And Some questions are listed :
(MGA QUESTIONS NA MARAMI 2 PAGE)
Itong mga GUIDE QUESTIONS NA ITO ay hindi sinasagot ng guro lang o ng isang indibidwal.
kundi, maraming paraan kung saan masasagot ang mga ito.
8th page
Ang ilan sa mga COMMON METHODS na maaring gamitin o maging paraan natin para
masagot yung mga guide questions ay ANG MGA SUMUSUNOD: like
1. discussion with class
2. informal conversation or observation
3. individual student interviews
4. evaluation forms
5. observation in class/session of teacher/trainer by colleagues
6. video-tape of own teaching (micro-teaching)

7. organizational document
8. participant contract
9. performance test
10. questionnaire
11. self-assessment
12. written test
9th PAGE
Ngayon pag usapan naman natin kung paano nga ba inaapply itong CIPP Evaluation Model?
10th page
Being an academic model, the CIPP Evaluation Model has at its heart, the company /
institution core values, which should be kept in mind throughout.
11th page
The CIPP Evaluation Model begins with Context Evaluation, which establishes the goals of
the programme. At this stage, the beneficiaries and their needs are also identified, along
with potential resources available on hand, and potential problems that will need to be
overcome. At this stage, the background of the programme will need to be evaluated, and
any social / economic / political / geographical / cultural factors within the immediate
environment are to be accounted for.
Ito yung tungkol sa environment kung saan gagamitin yung isang program.
12th page
At the next stage of the CIPP Evaluation Model, Input Evaluation encompasses the
programme plans / planning. Stakeholders will need to be engaged, and suitable strategies
of programme execution identified. Competing or conflicting strategies may also be
identified. A budget will need to be allocated and suitably portioned off. To ensure
sufficient coverage of the training programme, research may also have to be carried out.
13th page
With the Process Evaluation stage of the CIPP Evaluation Model, the actual actions are
evaluated. This can be cyclic, repeated throughout the develop / development stage, or
during the implementation / execution of the training programme. Controls to monitor the
progress will have to be in place, as well as a system for feedback from learners and
stakeholders, and vice versa.
14th page
Finally, the Product Evaluation stage of the CIPP Evaluation Model measures outcomes.
The impact or reach of the training programme, and its effectiveness in fulfilling the
objectives. Transportability seeks to determine if the training programme can be
transferred, adapted, or used in a different setting. Sustainability is another aspect to be
measured, accounting for how durable / long-lasting the benefits were. Adjustments to the
training programme may also need to be performed at this stage.
15th page
In conclusion, the 4 aspects of the CIPP Evaluation Model respectively ask: What needs to
be done (Context)? How should it be done (Input)? Is it being done (Process)? Did it
succeed (Product)? The CIPP Evaluation Model provides for both a big picture overview, as
well as the component overview, to better evaluate, account for, and improve upon training
programmes.
16th page
For formative and summative type, the context, input, and process is included in Formative
and the Product is in Summative
17th page
The CIPP model has the following strengths and limitations.
For its Strengths
 The model was not designed with any specific program or solution in mind; thus, it
can be easily applied to multiple evaluation situations.
 Its comprehensive approach to evaluation can be applied from program planning to
program outcomes and fulfilment of core values.
 The model is well established and has a long history of applicability.
And for the Limitations
 The model could be said to blur the line between evaluation and other investigative
processes such as needs assessment.
 It is not as widely known and applied in the performance improvement field as

other models.
18th page
And for the summary of keywords and phrases for our group.
 Assessment is the process of gathering and analyzing specific information as a part of

an evaluation.
 Competency evaluation is a means for teachers to determine the ability of their
students in other ways besides the standardized test.
 Course Evaluation is the process of evaluating the instruction of a given course.
 Educational Evaluation is the evaluation that is that is conducted specifically in an
educational setting.
 Immanent Evaluation opposed by Gilles Deleuze to value judgment.
 Performance Evaluation is a term from the field of language testing. It stands in contrast
to competence evaluation.
 Program Evaluation is essentially a set of philosophies and techniques to determine if a
set of philosophies and techniques to determine if a profram ‘works’.
(And this are my references)
REFERENCES:
http://ivanteh-runningman.blogspot.com/2015/03/cipp-evaluation-model.html
https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/performance-evaluation-
proven/9780787988838/ch008-sec008.html
19th page
Thank you for listening and God Bless Everyone!

CIPP Evaluation Model

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CIPP Evaluation Model

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

CIPP Evaluation Model

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

1ST PAGE

I am going to discuss the CIPP Model

So what is CIPP Evaluation Model

6th and 7th page:

kundi, maraming paraan kung saan masasagot ang mga ito.

masagot yung mga guide questions ay ANG MGA SUMUSUNOD: like

1. discussion with class

2. informal conversation or observation

3. individual student interviews

5. observation in class/session of teacher/trainer by colleagues

6. video-tape of own teaching (micro-teaching)

12. written test

The CIPP model has the following strengths and limitations.

For its Strengths

And for the Limitations

 It is not as widely known and applied in the performance improvement field as

 Assessment is the process of gathering and analyzing specific information as a part of

(And this are my references)

Thank you for listening and God Bless Everyone!

You might also like