Republic Vs Batuigas (For Recit)

Whether or not petitioner has validly complied the citizenship requirement
as required by law to become a naturalized citizen of the Philippines.
Republic v Batuigas (Digest)
RULING:
Republic of the Philippines vs. Azucena Saavedra Batu(i)gas (DIGEST)
Yes.
GR No. 183110
Under existing laws, an alien may acquire Philippine citizenship through
either judicial naturalization under CA 473 or administrative naturalization
7 October 2013
under Republic Act No. 9139 (the “Administrative Naturalization Law of
2000”). A third option, called derivative naturalization, which is available to
alien women married to Filipino husbands is found under Section 15 of CA
TOPIC:
473, which provides that:
Effect of Naturalization on the Wife, Naturalization, Citizenship
“Any woman who is now or may hereafter be married to a citizen of the

FACTS:
Philippines and who might herself be lawfully naturalized shall be deemed
a citizen of the Philippines.”
This Petition for Review assails the Decision of the CA, which affirmed the
Decision of the RTC that granted the Petition for Naturalization of
Under this provision, foreign women who are married to Philippine citizens
respondent Azucena Saavedra Batuigas (Azucena).
may be deemed ipso facto Philippine citizens and it is neither necessary
for them to prove that they possess other qualifications for naturalization
at the time of their marriage nor do they have to submit themselves to
On December 2, 2002, Azucena filed a Petition for Naturalization before judicial naturalization.
the RTC of Zamboanga del Sur. She stated that she intends in good faith
to become a citizen of the Philippines and to renounce absolutely and
forever all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state or
Records, however, show that in February 1980, Azucena applied before
sovereignty, and particularly to China; and that she will reside
the then Commission on Immigration and Deportation (CID) for the
continuously in the Philippines from the time of the filing of her Petition up
cancellation of her Alien Certificate of Registration by reason of her
to the time of her naturalization.
marriage to a Filipino citizen. The CID granted her application. However,
the Ministry of Justice set aside the ruling of the CID as it found no
sufficient evidence that Azucena’s husband is a Filipino citizen, as only
After all the jurisdictional requirements had been complied with, the Office their marriage certificate was presented to establish his citizenship. As the
of the Solicitor General filed its Motion to Dismiss on the ground that records before this Court show, Santiago’s Filipino citizenship has been
Azucena failed to allege that she is engaged in a lawful occupation or in adequately proven. Under judicial proceeding, Santiago submitted his
some known lucrative trade. The OSG maintained that Azucena is not birth certificate indicating therein that he and his parents are Filipinos. He
allowed under the Retail Trade to engage directly or indirectly in the retail also submitted voter’s registration, land titles, and business
trade. The OSG likewise disputed Azucena’s claim that she owns real registrations/licenses, all of which are public records.
property because aliens are precluded from owning lands in the country.
Finding the grounds relied upon by the OSG to be evidentiary in nature,
the RTC denied said Motion.
Moreover, the Court acknowledged that the main objective of extending
the citizenship privilege to an alien wife is to maintain a unity of allegiance
among family members, thus:
Born in Malangas, Zamboanga del Sur on September 28, 1941 to Chinese
parents, Azucena has never departed the Philippines since birth. Azucena
can speak English, Tagalog, Visayan, and Chavacano. Her primary,
It is, therefore, not congruent with our cherished traditions of family unity
secondary, and tertiary education were taken in Philippine schools. After
and identity that a husband should be a citizen and the wife an alien, and
earning a degree in education, she then practiced her teaching profession
that the national treatment of one should be different from that of the
in several different schools in Mindanao.
other.
In 1968, at the age of 26, Azucena married Santiago Batuigas (Santiago),

Azucena has clearly proven, under strict judicial scrutiny, that she is
a natural-born Filipino citizen. They have five children, all of whom studied
qualified for the grant of that privilege, and this Court will not stand in the
in Philippine public and private schools and are all professionals.
way of making her a part of a truly Filipino family.
After her stint as a teacher, Azucena and her husband, as conjugal

WHEREFORE, the Petition is DENIED. The Decision of the Court of
partners, engaged in the retail business of and later on in
which affirmed the Decision of the Regional Trial Court, that granted the
milling/distributing rice, corn, and copra. As proof of their income, Azucena
Petition for Naturalization, is hereby AFFIRMED. Subject to compliance
submitted their joint annual tax returns and balance sheets from 2000-
with the period and the requirements under Republic Act No. 530 which
2002 and from 2004-2005. During their marital union, the Batuigas
supplements the Revised Naturalization Law, let a Certificate of
spouses bought parcels of land in Barrio Lombog, Margosatubig.
Naturalization be issued to AZUCENA SAAVEDRA BATUIGAS after
taking an oath of allegiance to the Republic of the Philippines. Thereafter,
her Alien Certificate of Registration should be cancelled.
ISSUE:

Republic Vs Batuigas (For Recit)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Republic Vs Batuigas (For Recit)

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Republic Vs Batuigas (For Recit)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Whether or not petitioner has validly complied the citizenship requirement

as required by law to become a naturalized citizen of the Philippines.

“Any woman who is now or may hereafter be married to a citizen of the

In 1968, at the age of 26, Azucena married Santiago Batuigas (Santiago),

After her stint as a teacher, Azucena and her husband, as conjugal

You might also like