Rational Choice Theory
Rational Choice Theory
Rational Choice Theory
KEY TAKEAWAYS
The invisible hand itself is a metaphor for the unseen forces that influence a free
market economy. First and foremost, the invisible hand theory assumes self-
interest. Both this theory and further developments in the rational choice theory
refute any negative misconceptions associated with self-interest. Instead, these
concepts suggest that rational actors acting with their own self-interest in mind
can actually create benefits for the economy at large.
Similarly, the economist Richard Thaler pointed out further limitations of the
assumption that humans operate as rational actors. Thaler's idea of mental
accounting shows how people place greater value on some dollars than others,
even though all dollars have the same value. They might drive to another store to
save $10 on a $20 purchase but they would not drive to another store to save
$10 on a $1,000 purchase.
Like all theories, one of the benefits of rational choice theory is that can be
helpful in explaining individual and collective behaviors. All theories attempt to
give meaning to the things we observe in the world. Rational choice theory can
explain why people, groups, and society as a whole make certain choices, based
on specific costs and rewards.
Rational choice theory also helps to explain behavior that seems irrational.
Because a central premise of rational choice theory is that all behavior is rational,
any action can be scrutinized for its underlying rational motivations.
All theories attempt to give meaning to the things we observe in the world.
In reality, people are often moved by external factors that are not rational,
such as emotions.
Individuals do not have perfect access to the information they would need
to make the most rational decision every time.
Rational behavior may not involve receiving the most monetary or material
benefit; the benefit of a particular choice could be purely emotional or non-
monetary. For example, while it is likely more financially beneficial for an
executive to stay on at a company rather than take time off to care for their new
newborn child, it is still considered rational behavior for them to take time off if
they feel that the benefits of the time spent with their child outweigh the utility
from the paycheck they receive.