No. ih SET BRA Bh Me te 2 tt 1 QARAGIANABA DH (State Joint Stock Company “Uzbekenergo”) QRATASYA BY UEK HA & BR i 4 ie Se BO Ht DFAFILLAR—b Call ft) 20044 1A RERH RX & tt Sh cR() 04-023(2/2)QRAEABYI ASL TERA TLE ES A Dra PILLAR —h AU) SARHANS a 18 16 17 18 The Comparison Study on Type of Shaft Arrangement of 370 MW Combined Cycle Power Plant Basic Technical Specification and Data for Preparation of Tender Documents of 370 MW Combined Cycle Power Plant The Study Result of Generator Cooling Method of 370 Combined Cycle Power Plant List of Tie-in Points for Utilities and Communications of 370 MW Combined Cycle Power Plant Selection of Optimum Cycle of Bottoming System Scope of Services and Works Comparison and Evaluation Method between Bids : Estimation of Liquidated Damage Rate for Performance Guarantee Test Results and Late Completion Questionnaire about Design Conditions of New Hot Water Supply System SR SSAS PRIS MILER SE Wy FADD AYh AHA L—FOLLIb FEA FEIAYH(C DM PDD) A-AG1Y ABFA URE1. BARHRNEJapan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) State Joint Stock Company “Uzbekenergo” The Comparison Study on Type of Shaft Arrangement of 370MW combined Cycle Power Plant Document No. TMP-0008 October, 2002 Tokyo Electric Power Services Co., Ltd.ee ee ere eee eet Table of Contents Operability.... Experience with Both Types of Shaft Arrangements Thermal Efficiency Operating Availability (Probability) Maintainability. Installation Area Requirement. Construction Cost Generation Cost ConclusionComparison Study on the Shaft Arrangement Here made is the comparison study on the type of the shaft arrangement of the combined cycle power plant comprised of the one (1) same model of gas turbine. Basically, there are two (2) types of shaft arrangements. One is called single-shaft arrangement where the gas turbine, a steam turbine and a generator are connected on the same shaft. The other is called multi-shaft arrangement where the gas turbine/generator shaft and the steam turbine/generator are separate, The following figures show the both types of shaft arrangements: Single-shaft combined cycle power plant J Main Stack fulti-shaft combined cycle power plant 0 Main Stack 0 Bypass Stack cr GEN st GEN As shown above, in case of the multi-shaft arrangement a generator and a bypass stack with a damper are additionally necessary. The comparison study is performed from the viewpoints of operability, thermal efficiency, operating availability, maintainability, installation area requirement and construction cost. 1. Operability In case of the shingle-shaft arrangement, the power plant could not be operated unless the components of the gas turbine, the heat recovery steam generator and the gerierator are all healthy. On the other hand, in case of the multi-shaft arrangement, even if any components of the heat recovery steam generator, the steam turbine, and the steam turbine generator areout of service due to any reasons, the gas turbine/generator could be operated as a simple cycle provided that the exhaust gas from the gas turbine is discharged into atmosphere through the bypass stack. Thus, the operability of multi-shaft combined cycle power plant is more flexible than the single-shaft combined cycle power plant. The combined cycle power plant could be operated only by adjustment of the fuel flow into the gas turbine, so that there is no difference with the operation between both types of power plants. Such things as stated above are reasons why the multi-shaft combined cycle power plants are commonly employed in the developing countries for continuous base load operation Moreover, in case of the multi-shaft combined cycle power plant, two-stage construction could be also expected. That is to say, there is an advantage that the gas turbine/generator will be put into service at the former stage because the completion period is shorter, and the bottoming cycle equipment will be constructed at the latter stage to meet the increment of the power demand. In case of the single-shaft combined cycle power plant, the auxiliary steam for cooling, sealing and hogging is required because the steam turbine has to be accelerated with start-up of the gas turbine. For the purpose, an auxiliary boiler will be needed unless the steam is available from external sources. While, such steam is not needed for start-up of the multi-shaft combined cycle power plant because the steam turbine will be started up after the necessary steam is available from the heat recovery steam generator. However, the start-up time to the full load of the multi-shaft combined cycle power plant will be longer because of sequential start-up of the gas turbine and the steam turbine. 2. Experience with Both Types of Shaft Arrangements ‘As shown in the attached Tables 1 and 2, there are much application experiences with both shaft types of combined cycle power plants. It is understood that both types of shaft arrangements are technically feasible without any difficulties. 3. Thermal Efficiency The single-shaft combined cycle power plant is equipped with one (1) large size generator, while two (2) small size of generators are employed in the multi-shaft combined cycle power plant. Therefore, the thermal efficiency of the single-shaft combined cycle power plant is theoretically higher by the difference of the generator efficiencies between both plants However, the difference is negligibly small.4. Operating Availability (Probability) ‘The operating availabilities of both power plants are calculated on the assumption that the reliabilities of components are as shown below: Gas turbine: A =975% Heat recovery steam generator Steam turbine Gas turbine generator and transformer Steam turbine generator and transformer The impact on the operating availability due to the maintenance is not considered for not envisaged that there exists the significant difference between the operating availabilities of both power plants. this comparison because it i The followings are the theoretically calculated operating availabilities on an hour basis, of the single-shaft combined cycle power plant as OAHs and the multi-shaft combined cycle power plant as OAH. OAHs = Aix Ar AsXAx= 0.975 X 0.990 0.985 0.997 = 0.948 = 94.8 % OAHy = Ai A2XA3 X Ag As + Ai X Ag (1 - A2XA3 As) = 0.975 X 0,990 X 0,985 X 0.997 X 0.997 + 0.975 X 0.997(1 - 0.990 0.985 x 0.997) = 0.945 + 0.027 = 0.972 = 97.2% The figure of 94.5% out of the operating availability (97.2%) of the multi-shaft combined cycle power plant shows the operating availability where the power plant will be wholly operated. While, the figure of 2.7% is the operating availability (probability) where only the gas turbine/generator will be operated. As far as the operating availability on an hour basis is concemed, the multi-shaft combined cycle power plant is higher by 2.4%4(-97.2 - 94.8) than the single-shaft combined cycle power plant. Similarly, the operating availabilities on an energy basis of both types of plants are can be theoretically calculated as follows: Single-shaft combined cycle power plant: 94.8% Multi-shait combined cycle power plant: 96.3%Where, the ratio of the gas turbine power output is assumed to be two third (2/3) of the power plant. As the results, the operating availability on an energy basis of the multi-shaft combined cycle power plant is higher by 1.5% (-96.3 - 94.8) than the single-shaft combined cycle power plant. 5. Maintainability Compared with the single-shaft combined cycle power plant, the multi-shaft combined cycle power plant is equipped with additional components such as a bypass stack, a bypass stack silencer, an exhaust gas damper, a generator, a step-up transformer, a lubricating oil system and a control oil system. Therefore, it is easily envisaged that the maintenance of the multi-shaft combined cycle power plant needs more man-hour requirement and is costly. 6. Installation Area Requirement The requirement area for installation of one (1) unit of single-shaft combined cycle power plant is 69,000m? (60m by 115m) as shown in the attached Figure 1 “Typical Layout of Single-shaft Type”. While 86,250m* (75m by 115m) is required for one (1) unit of multi-shaft combined cycle power plant with 25% of requirement area increase as shown in the attached Figure 2 “Typical Layout of Multi-shaft Type”. However, one (1) unit of multi-shaft combined cycle power plant can be installed on the given site area without any difficulties. 7. Construction Cost The mutti-shaft combined cycle power plant is constituted of more components as mentioned in above clauses. Therefore, the construction cost will increase compared with the single-shaft combined cycle power plant. The attached Table 3 shows the tentative cost comparison between the multi-shaft type and single-shaft type. As shown in the table, the cost of the former is higher by some 4 % than the latter. The detailed cost comparison will be made through the Study. 8. Generation Cost The generation cost of the single-shaft combined cycle power plant is estimated at 2.13 US cents in Table 13-2 of Feasibility Stage Report. While that of the multi-shaft combined cycle power plant can be calculated as follows:(1) Fuel cost Fuel cost is increased by 2.4 % due to the improvement of the operating availability on @ @) @ an hour basis. Therefore, the fuel cost is calculated at 41.28 MMUS$ (~ 40.313 x 1.024). Operating and maintenance cost If the fixed maintenance cost is proportional to the construction cost and the variable maintenance cost is proportional to the operating availability, the operating and maintenance cost can be calculated as follows referring to 3) of Clause 13.1.3 of the Report. 1.8X 1,041+1.8 x 1.02440.091+1 = 4.81MMUSS Capital cost Since the capital cost is proportional to the construction cost, it is calculated at 41.28MMUSS (40.313 1.04). Energy sales Since the energy sales is proportional to the operating availability on an energy basis, itis calculated at 2,558MMKWh (2,520 1.015). Therefore, the generation cost of the multi-shaft arrangement power plant is estimated at 2.16 US cents/kWh (= (41.28+4.81441.28) x 100/2,558) 9. Conclusion Above study results are summarized as described below: @ @ @) Operability The operability of multi-shaft combined cycle power plant is more flexible than the single-shaft combined cycle power plant because the gas turbine/generator could be operated as a simple cycle even if any components of the heat recovery steam generator, the steam turbine, and the steam turbine generator are out of service due to any reasons. Moreover, in case of the multi-shaft combined cycle power plant, two-stage construction could be also expected. Experience ‘As shown in attached Tables 1 and 2, there is much experience with both types of combined cycle power plants. Therefore, both types. can be deemed technically proven. Thermal Efficiency The difference of the thermal efficiencies between both types of combined cycle power plants is negligibly small.4 6) © (o) (8) Operating Availability The hour and energy basis operating availabi calculated as below: ies of both power plants are as Single-shaft Multi-shaft ‘Hour basis operating availability Base (1.0) 1.024 Energy basis operating availability Base (1.0) 1.015 Maintainability The maintenance of the multi-shaft combined cycle power plant needs more ‘man-hour requitement and is costly. Installation Area Requirement The multi-shaft combined cycle power plant needs more installation area, but can be installed on the given area without any difficulties. Construction Cost It is estimated that the construction cost of the multi-shaft combined cycle power plant is higher by approximately 4% than that of the single-shaft one. The detailed cost estimation of both types of combined cycle power plants will be made through the Study, but it is foreseen that either of their costs will be settled in the specified budget cost. Generation Cost ‘The generation cost of the multi-shaft combined cycle power plant is estimated at 2.16 US cents/kWh compared with 2.13 US cents/kWh of the single-shaft combined cycle power plant described in the clause 13.2.4 of Feasibility Study Report. The generation cost difference is approximately 1.4%. As described above, there is no significant difference between the single-shaft and multi-shat combined cycle power plants. ‘We understand that the type of the shaft arrangement of the combined cycle power plant to be introduced in Tashkent Thermal Power Plant will be determined depending on the intent of Uzbekistan side.15m =~ SECTION 8-8 Figure 1 Typical Layout of Single-Shaft Combined Oycle Power Prant feat Eo ZT Elon a ae ‘We Oi TaN Tas oe SECTION A-A oat eee SINGLE SHAFT TYPE] TASHKENT POWER STATION GENERAL LAYOUTTis > 1 a ee ee eet i = “SECTION 6-8" | | Pe mas Lt | = CRANE i Tt : + 20 Ment = IE i ; | ss bara Tol Figure 2 Typical Layout of Mult-Shaft Combined Cycle Power Plant | GENERAL LAYOUTable 1 Single-shaft Combined. Cycle Power Plant (above 100MW) Experience. Model Plant Name Country Operation Year Unit Capacity _No. of Unit ABB KA26 Staythorpe UK 2003 400 4 KAz4 Monterrey. Mexico 2003 250 4 KA26 ‘San Roque Spain 2002 400 2 KA26 B sos Spain 2002 400 2 KA26 Bowin Thailand 2002 350 2 KA26 Chiba Japan 2002 400 1 KA26 ‘Swanbank Austraria 2002 380 1 KA26 Bang Bo Thailand 2002 350 1 KA26 Castejan Spain 2002 380 1 Kaza Termobahia 2002 185 1 KA24 Termorio Brazil 2002 185 1 KAz4 Hermosillo Mexico 2001 253 1 KAz4 Milford USA 2001 265 2 KAz4 Bellingham USA 2001 265 2 KA26 Enfield UK 1999 396 1 KAz4 Agawan usa 1999 ant 1 KATINZ Dighton uUsA 1999 168 1 KA26 Taranaki NZ 1998 360 1 KA26 RDK-4s, Germany 1998 360 1 KAI3E2 APIIGCC Italy 1998 275 i KAT INZ Bao Shan China 1997 150 1 KA13E2 Meishi II China 1996 237 1 KAI3E2 men 33 NZ 1995 160 1 KALIN West Winsor Canada 1995 120 1 KAISE2 Lage Weide 6 NZ 1994 248 1 KAI3D Deep Dubai 1993 135 1 KATIN Orland USA 1993 120 1 KAISE Roosecote UK 1991 224 1 KAN Hazleton USA 1989 135 1 KAISE MK 12 NZ 1989 225 1 KAT3E, Hemweg, NZ 1988 200 1 KA13D Korneuburg, Austria 1980 128 1 TOTAL 43 GE STAG 103FA Shinagawa Japan 2001-2003 380 3 STAG 103FA Chiba Japan i998 360 4 STAG 109FA Akzo NZ 1998 360 1Model Plant Name Country Operation Year Unit Capacity No. of Unit GE STAG 108FA ——_Baffolora Italy 1998 110 1 STAG 107FA ——Kawagoe Japan 1998 235 7 STAG 109FA Yokohama Japan 1997 350 8 STAG 107FA Hermiston USA 1996 213 2 STAG 107FA ——_Cogentrix USA 1996 248 1 STAG 109FA Gent Belgium 1996 350 2 STAG 109FA ——_Black Point China 1995 340 8 STAG 109FA —- EPON Netherland 1995 350 5 STAG 107F Connah's Quey UK 1995 350 4 STAG 107EA —_—Shin-Oita Japan 1992 138 5 STAG 107F Yanai Japan 1990 125 6 STAG 107E Yokkaichi Japan 1988 112 5 STAG 109E Futtsu Japan 1986 165 4 TOTAL 76 MHI MPCP1(M701F) Serervaya Azerbaijan 2002 438 1 MPCP1(M701F) — Harripur Bangladesh 2001 365 1 MPCPI(M701F) Tuas il Singapore 2001 360 2 MPCPI(M701F) PPN India 2001 348 1 MPCPI(M701F) — Saltend UK 2000 400 3 MPGPI(M701F) San Ishidro Chile 1998 370 1 MPCP1(M701F) Chiba vapan 1999 360 4 MPCPI(M701D) JR Kawasaki Japan 1999 190 1 MPGPI(MS01F) — Nanpu Taiwan 2003 251 1 MPCPI(M501F) Trans Alta Mexico 2002 282 1 MPGPI(M501D) — Hunamachi Japan 1999 149 1 MPCPI(M501F) — Shin-Ohita vapan 1997 218 2] MPCP1(MBO1F) — Kawagoe Japan 1997 243 7 MPCPI(M701D) STEAG. Netherland 1997 145 1 MPCP1(M501F) — Shin-Ohita Japan 1996 218 2 MPCPI(M501D) Fukuyama Japan 1996 145 1 MPGP1(M501D) Mizushima Japan 1995 145 2 MPCPI(M701D) Kawasaki Steel vapan 1988 145 1 TOTAL 33 Siemens GUD 18. V94.3A Campo de Gibraltar Spain 2003 385 2 GUD 1S. V943A Pulau Seray Singapore 2002 370 2 GUD 15. V843A San Lorenzo Philippines 2002 250 2] 10Model Plant Name Country Operation Year Unit Capacity No. of Unit Siemens GUD 1S. V94.3A Donaustadt Austria 2001 385 1 GUD 18. V64.3A San Pedro Domonican 2001 100 3 GUD 18. V64.3A Rzeszow Poland 2001 100 1 GUD 18. V943A Seabank 2 UK 2000 385 1 GUD 18. V643A Terni Italy 2000 100 1 GUD 1S. V943A Cottam UK 1999 380 1 GUD 1S. V84.3A Santa Rita Philippine 1999 260 4 GUD 1S. V943A —Otahuhu NZ 1998 260 1 GUD 1S. V84.3A St. Fransis USA 1998 260 2 GUD 1S. V94.3A — Quteiro Portugal 1996 260 3 GUD 18. V94.3 King's Lynn UK 1996 340 1 GUD 1S. V94.2 Buggenum Netherlands 1993 280 1 TOTAL 26 ulTable 2. 3,000rpm Multi~Shaft Combined Cycle Power Plant Experience (1/3) Model Plant Name Country Operation Year Configuration Unit Gapacity(MW) » No. of Unit Type of Fuel ABB KA26-1 RDK Karlsruhe DE 1997 font 360 1 NG/DO KA26-2 Rocksavage UK 1997 Zon 720 1 NG KA26-2 Dock Sud AR 2000 2ont 75 1 NGyDO KA26-2 Goryton UK 2001 2oni 778 1 NG/DO KA26-1 Senoko SG 2001 ont 400 1 NG/DO Total 5 GE ‘S209FA Keadby UK 1995 2ont 780 2 NG ‘S209FA Little Barford UK 1996 2ont 780 2 NG S209FA AES Medway Uk 1996 2ont 780 2 NG S209FA ‘South Bangkok I TH 1997 Zon 780 2 NG/DO S109FA Gent-Ringvaart BE 1998 font 390 1 NG S109FA Nueva Renoa cL 1998 lon} 390 1 N@/Do SIO9FA Saint-Ghislain BE 1999 1ont 390 1 NG ‘S209FA Dabhol Power IN 1999 2ont 780 2 NG/DO S209FA Rachaburi TH 2000 2ont 780 1 N@/DO ‘S209FA Tri Enerey TH 2000 2ont 780 2 N@yDO S209FA Sutton Bridge UK 2000 2ont 780 2 NG S209FA Rachaburi TH 2000 Zond 780 4 NG/DO S109FA Pulau Sakra 8G 2000 font 390 1 NG/DO ‘S109FA Esch-Sur-Alzette x 2001 ont 390 1 NG/DO ‘$209FA Dabhol Power IN 2001 ont 780 4 NG/DO ‘S209FA Castellon sP 2001 2ont 780 2 NG/DO Total “Table 2 3,000rpm Multi-Shaft Combined Cycle Power Plant Experience (2/3) Mode! Plant Name Country Operation Year Configuration Unit Gapacit(MW) No. of Unit Type of Fuel MHI MPCP2(M701F) EGAT Wang Noi | TH 1997, 2ont 650 2 NG/DO MPCP2(M701F) EGAT Wang Noi Il TH 1998. 2ont 720 1 NG/DO MPCPI(M701F) San Isidro cL 1998 ton 370 1 NG/DO MPCP2(M701F) TEAS Bursa Tk. 1999 2ont 700, 2 NG MPCP2(M701F) Costanera AR 1999 2ont 830 1 NG/DO MPCPS(M701F) Phu My.t N 2001 3ont 1,090 1 NG/DO MPCP2(M701F) AES Parana AR 2001 2ont 740 1 NG/DO MPCPI(M701F) AES Haripur BAN 2001 lon 360 1 NG MPCPI(M701F) PPN IN 2001 ton 360 1 NG/Naphtha MPCP2(M701F) Damhead UK 2001 2ont 790 1 NG MPCP2(M701F) Port Dickson ML 2004 2ont 730 1 NG/DO MPCP2(M701F) Cairo North EGY 2004 2ont 750 1 NG/DO Total 4 Siemens GDU 1.9434 —_Lujan’De Cuyo AR 1998 ont 380 1 NG/Do GDU 1.943 Nehuenco cH 1998 ont 380 1 NG/DO GDU 2.943A Didcot UK 1998 2ont 760 1 NG GUD 2.943A —Genelba AR 1999 -2ont 760 1 NG/DO GUD 3.943A Al Taweelah UAE 2000 Bont 1.185: 2 NG/DO GUD 3.943A Peterhead UK 2000 Bont 1,155: 1 NG GUD 2.943A Seabank UK 2000 2ont 10, 1 NG GUD 2.943A Salta AR 2000 2ont 770 1 NG/DO GUD 3.943A Al Taweelah UAE 2001 3ont 1,155 2 NG/DO GDU1.943A —Porto’Marghera iT 2001 tont 385 1 NG GDU 1.943A —_Verbrande Brug BE 2001 tont 385 1 NG GDUT.949A 0 - GR 2001 Jon 385 1 NG GUD 3.943A Jebel Alik UAE 2002 Bont 1155 2 NG/DOTable 2 3,000rpm Multi-Shaft Combined Cycle Power Plant Experience (3/3) Mode! Plant Name Country Operation Year Configuration Unit Capacity(MW) No. of Unit Type of Fuel GUD 1.943A La Casella IT 2002 tont 385 5 NG GUD 1.943A —Hunstown PWR Stat IR 2002 tont 385 1 NG GUD 2.94.3A —Teluk Gong ML 2002 Zon 710 1 N@/DO GUD 2.943A Phu My 3 VN 2003 2ont 710 1 NG/DO GUD 2.943A —Knapsack GR 2004 2ont 710 1 NG GUD 2.943A —Riinmond NL 2004 2ont 710 1 NG. Total 26Table 3 Gonsuruction Cost Comparison Name of Components Single-Shaft Combined Cycle Power Plant Multi-Shaft Combined Cycle Power Plant Foreign Portion | Looal Portion Total Foreign Portion | Local Portion Total Gas Turbine & Accessaries 41,625 3,963 45,588, Gonerator & Accessories~Gas Turbine buaas aan oe ‘Steam Turbine & Accessaries 28,776 2,986 31,762 Generator & Accessories-Steam Turbine 21,808 foe a, Electrical Systems-Gas Turbine/ Generator 1,250 234 1,484 4322 716 5,038 Electrical Systems-Steam Turbine Generator 5,945 1,189 7,134 3,389 678 4,067 [High Voltage Switchyard 2,273 682, 2.955 2.386 716 3.102, HRSG & Accessories 18,805 4.870 23,675 18,805, 4870 23.675 Condenser & Accessories 3,421 ANG 3,837 3421 416 3,837 Giroulating Water System 2,060 7,488. 3.548 2,060 7,488 3,548 Water Treatment System 836. 621 1,457 836, 621 4,457 Waste Water Treatment System 191 94 285 191 94 285 Closed Cooling Water System 527 210 731 527 210 731 Buildings 13,222 8,101 21,323, 13,222, 8101 21,323, Fire Protection Ststem 718 500 1278 718. 500 4.278 | Fuel Gas Pre-treatment & Compressor Stn. 7,080. 2.994 10,074 7,080 2,994 10,074 [Bypass Stack & Diverter Damper of 0 oy 2,069 650. 2719 Station & Instrument Air System 510 119 629 510 119. 629 Plant Contor and Monitoring System 2196 296 2482 2196 296. 2,482 Continuous Emission Monitoring System 503 319) 822 503 319) 822 ‘Sub-Total 129,988, 29,082 159,070 135,815. 29,976, 165,791 Training of Client's Staff at Factory 153 0 153 153 0 153 ‘Supervisory by Engineers for One (1) Year 878 0 878, B18. 0 878 “Transportation to Site 10,399 oO 10,399 10,865, oO 40,865 ‘Spare Parts 12,999. of 12,999 13.582, 0 13,582 ‘Sub-Total 154,417 29,082 183,499 161,293, 29.976, 191,269 Price Escalation(3.5%) 5.513 1,038. 6,551 5,758 1,070 6,828 ‘Sub-Total 159,930. 30,120, 190.050. 167,051 31,046 198,097, Physical Gontingency(8%) 12,794 2410 15,204 13,364 2.484 15,848. Gonsulting Service including P/S(H) & P/C(SH) 4700 700, 5,400. 4,700 700. 5.400 a Grand Total 177.424 | 33,230 210,654, 785.115 34,230 219,345, Unit: 1,000 US$ (132.66UPY/US$)State Joint Stock Company “Uzbekenergo” Tashkent Thermal Power Plant Modernization Project Basic Technical Specifications and Data for Preparation of Tender Documents of 370MW Combined Cycle Power Plant Documents No. TMP-0006 R1 November 27, 2002 Japan International Cooperation Agency Tokyo Electric Power Services Co., Ltd.Foreword This is to inquire basic technical specifications and .data--necessary for preparation of Tender Documents for international competitive bidding for Engineering, Procurement and Construction of nominal capacity 370MW Combined Cycle Power Plant. The Plant will be installed in the premise of Tashkent Thermal Power Plant. Some basic technical specifications and data are already given by the Study ‘Team based on the information which was given at the Feasibility Study Stage, the relevant JICA /JBIC reports and TEPSCO's experience. They will be discussed and finalized with Uzbekenergo during the First On-site Study, The remaining specifications and data will be provided with Uzbekenergo by the beginning stage of the Second On-site Study where the preparation works of the Tender Documents will start. We would like to solicit for your cooperative support for decision of such basic technical specifications as described in the attached sheets and for our acquisition of the data enquired in the sheets.eee Pee bert Table of Contents Tender Requirements Design Conditions and/or Basic Technical Specifications Guarantee Requirements Technical Information and/or Data to be provided by UzbekenergoBasic Technical Specifications and Data to be provided and/or clarified by Uzbekenergo — Diseription Specifications and Data 1. Tender Requirements (1) Conditions for requirements a, Ambient temperature 16 °C . Barometric pressure 96_kPa ©. Alutitude 500 m 4. Relative humidity 52% ¢. Cooling water temperature 12°C £. Type of fuel Supply pressure of natural gas at terminal point h, Supply-temperature of natural gas at terminal 1. Type of gas turbine J. Type of shaft configuration of combined oycle plant (2) Requirements a. Net plant power output b. Net plant heat rate at full load on a basis of LHV of natural gas 2. Design Conditions and/or Basic Technical Specifications (1) Ambient conditions a. Temperature range b. Design temperature . Relative humidity 4. Cooling water temperature range ¢, Design cooling water temperature Bukhara gas (March to Oct.) Shurtan gas (Nov. to Feb.) Norinal 7.84 bar (g) ‘Mimimum 6.0 bar(a) 4’ ‘Single-shaft simple open cycle heavy duty industrial type gas turbine with a firing temperature of 1,350°Cclass Multi-shaft configuration with one(1) ges turbine 350MW ~.380 MW Max. KvkWh 215.6 to +41.1°C sc 2 to 3% B_to 16 12%Discription Specifications and Data (@) Service life on 180 3977 Part 3 25 years (3) Anticipated operation load range —50_ to 100 % load (4) Anticipated averaged load factor 21.2.% per annum (5) Minimum controllable load 30% (6) Anticipated annual operating hours. Total 8000_ hours a. Atfull load 7980_hours b. At_$0_% load hours ©. At_30_% load 20_-hours (7) Anticipated No. of start-up times per annum 4, Cold start after stop for more than 36 hours —2_times +b, Warm start after stop for less than 36 hours times . Hot start after stop more than 8 hours —1 times d. Very hot start after stop for less than Thour ——times (8) ‘Lime required tor start-up to tull load after pushing start-up button a. Cold start At longest _4 “hours , Warm start At longest _3_hours . Hot start At longest _2_ hours d. Very hot start % At longest _1_hours (9) Plant layout (10) Equipment layout a, Gas and steam turbine generators b. Arrangement of gas and steam turbine generators ¢. Control and electrical equipment 4, Natural gas pre-treatment/compressor station Consideration of future extension of same size combined eycle power plant Installed inside the building with a ventilation system, a lifting crane and Jaydown space Parallel arrangement Installed in the rooms integrated into the building Installed nearby the building:Discription Specifications and Data e, New switchyard £. Cooling water intake (11) Plant operation a. Type of operation 'b, Function of existing control room ©. Type of shift (12) Operation on oil fuel (13) Speed and load control a. Automatic frequency control ‘b, Constant load control ©. Droop (governor free) operation 4d. Load limit control 4. Overspeed trip device (14) Gas turbine control a. Surge limit control b. Temperature control . Acceleration speed control 4. Inlet guide vane control (15) Frequency variation under which load operation is allowed (16) Full toed shedding capability without trip (17) Operating pressure control (18) Airbome emissions on dry:condition (75 - 100% load of gas turbine over all ambient conditions) a. NOx Tnsialled adjacent to existing one Installed at the end of artificial intake pond CRT (touch-screen type) operation in the laying operating conditions with minimum operating parameters | 3 shifts by 4 regular and 1 training No yes yes yes yes Equipped with both mechanical and electrical type devices yes yes yes yes Sliding pressure above 60% load Constant pressure below 60% load <2Sppmv(dry)Discription Specifications and Data b, SOx b.co ©. Particulate (19) Noise emissions on steady state conditions 4. On power station boundary limit(without background noise) b, Ata distance of 1m from equipment or enclosure (20) Cooling water temperature increase across the condenser (21) Waste effuent water (22) Black-out start capability (23) Type of starting device of gas turbine (24) Type of steam turbine exhaust direction (25) Gas turbine compressor cleaning device (26) Type of heat recovery steam generator (27) Connection of auxiliary steam line with existing medium pressure steam line(header) Steam condition: (28) Type of cooling method of generator (29) Type of bottoming cycle (30) Type of 220KV switchyard Opearting voltage Maximum design voltage BIL withstand voltage Low frequency withstand voltage Required minimum clearances: Metal- Metal: Phase- Phase Phase-Ground Bus design clearances Phase spacing (centerline to centerline) Depends on sulphur contents in natural gas yes yes <15ppmv(ary) yes < 5mg/Nm (dry) to be discussed with TEP —AB(A) -8B(A) not more than 5°C World bank guide line or Uzbekistan regulation. , whichever is severer. no The following both types are available: a. A synchronous generator/motor with a thyristor frequency converter b. A squirrel cage motor with a torque converter Depends on choice of manufacturers yes Both types of exhaust gas vertical flow type and lateral flow type are available. yes 1.0 MPa (gauge) x 270°C To be discussed. To be discussed, Open air type 20KVv eee eee KV ——mm mm 4- ————— Discription Specifications and Data Main bus mam Branch bus mm Phase height above ground: Main bus mn Branch bus mn (31) Bypass exhaust stack for simple cycle operation (82) Exhaust stack height above the ground level (33) Shaft strength of gas and steam turbines (G4) Spare pats (35) Trainning period of 10 staff at EPC contractor's works (36) ‘Ihree(3) resident engineers (mechanical, electrical and control) of EPC contractor during defect liability period (37) Inspection intervals of gas turbine on an EOH basis ‘2, Combustion inspection b. Turbine inspection ‘c. Major inspection (38) Ambient air and cooring water temperatures to define the maximum capability of combined cycle power plant (39) Make-up water treatment equipment (40) Waste water treatment equipment (41) Continouos airborne emi ion monitoring system (42) Cooling water discharge channel 3. Guarantee Requirements (1) Guarantee Conditions a. Ambient temperature b. Barometric pressure c. Altitude yes __m (to be determined based on KIA results) Shall be designed to withstand the transient torque due to short circuit or out-of-phase synchronization, whichever is preater. For five (5) years operation Four (4) weeks yes ‘Min..8,000 hours Min, 16,000 hours ‘Min, 32,000 honrs Ambient air temperature _3°C Cooling water temperature 3 °C ‘New ercommenweofexisting ene New ercommen-ue-ofexisting one ves ‘New-or partial reuse of existing concrete culvert for a cooling tower Ae 96_ kPa 500_mDiscription Specifications and Data 4, Relative humidity 52% ©. Cooling water temperature _12°0 £. Type of fuel Bukhara gas and Shurtan ges g. Supply pressure of natural gas 1.84 bar h, Supply temperature of natural gas 4% i: Blowdown and make-up 0% J. Power factor, voltage sind frequency at generator terminals Equal to specified values k.Gas turbine inlet temperature at full load (2) Guaranteed Items a. Power output 8) Gas turbine gross power output ) Plant net power output . Heat rate 4) Plant net heat rate at full load b) Plant net heat rate at 75% load ©) Plant net heat rate at 50_% load ©. Aitborne emissions(75 - 100 % load) on dry conditions, a) NOx ‘b) SOx, co ©) Particulate 4. Noise emissions 4) Noise level on the station boundary limit on full load steady state conditions b) Noise level at a distance of 1m from equipment on full load steady state conditions Equal to specified value yes 3 &é a yesDiscription Specifications and Data ¢. Two (2) weeks reliability run 4. Technical information and/or data to be provided by Uzbekenergo (1) Meteorological data at site area or in the premise of Tashkent ‘Thermal Power Plant (2) Water conditions for raw water for make-up and cooling water (3) Fuel specification (4) Voltage rating for the new power plant (5) Environment protection regulations (6) Data for financial and economical analysis (7) Drawings to show the shapes of site area with dimensions and the site boundaries (8) Drawings to show the terminal points of natural gas (9) Single line diagram of existing 220kV switchyard (10) Drawings to show the steel structure frameworks of 220kV switchyard ” (11) Drawings to show the cross section of attificial cooling water intake pond around the condidate cooling water intake point for new (12), List of services to be provided free of charge by Uzbekenergo including electric load, fuel, make-up water, potable water during commissioning. (13) List of items to be monitored at the inlet to the exhaust gas stack yes Ttem 1 in the attached sheets to be filled Item 2 in the attached sheets to be filled Item 3 in the attached sheets to be filled ‘Item 4 in the attached sheets to be filled Item 5 in the attached sheets to be Hilled ‘Item 6 in the attached sheets to be filled To be provided by Uzbekenergo ‘To be provided by Uzbekenergo To be provided by Uzbekenergo To be provided by Uzbekenergo To be provided by Uzbekenergo To be provided by Uzbekenergo To be provided by UzhekenergoAttached Sheet Discription Data and/or Information to_be provided by Uzbekenergo 1. Meteorological Data i, Monthly ambient temperature (°C) Min, ‘Mean Max. January February March April May June July August September October November December _~8.5 47 205 ii, Monthly Relative Humidity (%) Min, Mean Max. January 16 73 7 February 22 66 Mareh u 55 = April u 53 May 12 40 June 10 30 July 9 34 August | 10 39 September 12 39 ; October 12 62 November 17 68 a December 18 69 iil, Rainfall Annual averaged 423__mm/year Hourly maximum Rainy season From_Oct_to__May Averaged total rainfall in the rainy season _18,3_mm g iv. Stiowfall ‘Maximum 130_mm 1Attached Sheets Diseription Data and/or Information to be provided by Uzbekenergo Snowfall days _15_ v. Wind data ‘Maximum speed 4-5 m/s with the recurrence of 2.7%, The usual wind speed is Im/s with the recurrence of 73.8% Averaged speed Prevailing direction. The following winds are prevail ENE, E, ESE-35.7%; ‘West winds: W, WNW, NW—25.1 % From, season From, season From____to__in_season vi. Isokeraunic level IKL_ 2. Water Conditions (1) Raw water for make-up water Source of water CO River water Gi Sea water CO Industrial water Tap water Canal freshwater ii, Supply conditions Available flow rate Max.__230 _m'/h Temperature Min, So Mean_19.5 °C Max. °c Pressure 0 __Bar(g) Location of terminal At the end of intake canal iii, Analysis data Fill in Table 1 “Analysis Data of Raw Water”) (2) Cooling Water i. Type of cooling water 5 Once-through type C_Re-circulation use type O Nouse type fi, Source of water © River water 1 Sea waterAttached Sheets Discription ‘Data and/or Information to be provided by Uzbekenergo C1 Industrial water DD Well water Canal freshwater iii, Supply conditions Available flow rate Max._44,000__m’/h Temperature Min_3 °C Mean_9.5 °C Max. 16°C Pressure 0 __Barfg) Location of terminal Intake intake iL Discharge At the end of existing concrete culvert __ iv. Restriction on usage of the water source ) Réstriction Yes Maximum temperature rise 5% ‘Maximum discharge temperature. Should not raise more than 5°C. °c v. Level of river water at the relevant canal Elevation of datum level $01.00_m Normal water level 497.10_m High water level 498.00 _m ‘Low water level 496.75 _m vi. Analysis data of cooling water Fill in Table 2 “Analysis Data of Cooling Water”) 3. Fuel (1) Shurtan Gas i, Type of gas Sour natural gas «Sweetened natural gas 1 Liquified natural gas) Blast furnace gas 1 Coke oven gas O others ii, Supply source ‘Name of supply authority _Uztranspaz iii, Supply conditions at the terminal point Distance from the new power plant to the terminal point 8Attached Sheet Discription Data and/or Information to be provided by Uzbekenergo : m Maximum available supply flow rate for the new power plant except for winter season 75,000N mid ‘Temperature Max, 26 °C Min, 2 °C Pressure Max. _0.98 MPa Nor, _0.78Mpa Min. 0.60 Mpa Max. step change _0.2_ MPa Max. ramp change __0.7_kPa/sec. Solids ‘Total mg/N mé Size range 210, % zu __% Ble % 150MVA) |JAPAN. [Tokyo Electric Power Co, Yokosuka 160) 144) 1992! |JAPAN. [T plant 286) 272| 1996] JAPAN Koa OiLOsaka 1166| +60] 1997] }JAPAN |Endesa Sar iro.Chile 162! 138 1997} Australia |AES. Mt Stuart 172! 155} 1998} [JAPAN |Nakayama Electric Power Co.Funamachi 166] 150) 1998] [JAPAN |Akemi,Power Co. 163} 147) 1999] Nakayama Electric Power Go,Nay +66] 150 1999 [MEXICO ICEF, Mexico STG. 178] 160) 1999} MEXICO |CEF, Mexico STG 160) 144} 1999} ; |GONOcO ant 146] 2000| JJAPAN Nippon Steel Co.Muroran 161 145) 2000) DOMINICA _[AES,DOMINICA GTG 219) 197] 2000] [ALABAMA [ALABAMA 212| 191 2000} MEXICO |TUXPAN GTG 189) 170! 2000) IMEXICO_ |TUXPAN STG 210) 189! 2000} |JAPAN. |Osaka Gas Co.LTD,Torishima 167, 150! 2001 [Altamira STG. 210] 189| 20011 [Altamira GTG. 190] 171 2001! Rio Gen Power Plant GTG 204] 173| 20011 JUSA_ |AES/Kentucky GREYSTONE GTG. 219] 197] 2001 |Mirant CoWyandotte C/C GTG 232! 197] 2001Operating Experience of Air Cooled Generator Rated Power Rotating Speed Name of Country Name of Project Rated Capacity Output riick Start-up Year | Operating Hours (aii) FTENASKA C/C GTG 213i 192 2002 PG&E G/C STG. 173] 147, 2002) [TAIWAN |Chang-Bin/Fong-Der_ C/C GTG 183} 160) 2002! JJAPAN, Cosmo Oil Co.,LTD, Yokkaichi 248) 223) 2003] Koa Oil Maribu 166} 149) 2004) | {Operating ‘Experience of Air Cooled Generator Name of Country Nome of Project daaaerr nad ome Rotavng Speed | Start-up Year | Operating Hours byte rom) [TSB (>100MvA) |PAKISTAN |COSTAL, SABA 170) 136) 1998} [JAPAN Nippon Steel Co. KAMAISI#1 166] 149) 1999} CANADA NOVA CHEMICAL JOFFRE 187 133 1999 [SAUDI ARABIA, ISWCC,AL KHOBARS #6 150) 120} 1995} ISAUDI-ARABIA_|SWCC.AL KHOBARS #7 150) 120} 1995} ISAUDI- ARABIA _|SWCC.AL KHOBARS #8 150] 120| 1996} ISAUDI ARABIA_|SWCC.AL KHOBAR3 #9 150} 120) 1996] JAPAN. [Tokyo Electric Power Co,O1##1 142] 128) 1993} MALAYSIA NEBPAKA#1 124 105 1986| MALAYSIA NEBPAKA#2 12a| 105| 1987 MALAYSIA |NEBPAKA#3 24 105| 1987 JUSA. |FLUOR DANIEL,SALT CITY 107 1 1992!Operating Experience of Air Cooled Generator : - ; Power ; Name of Gountry Name of Project Porpavanti oun tit aoe Start-up Year | Operating Hours HTC (>200MVA) [Japan fToa-sTa 217 3009 2002 _| Korea ianwhan4 202 3609 2001 Korea. |Hanwha-3. 202! 3600) 1999} ma 4Operatirig Experience of Air Cooled Generator Name of Country Name of Project Pont Tossa ll Rotating Speed | start-up Year | Operating Hours a (rpm) [ust ( >100MvA) Indonesia JAmoseas indonesia Ino.Darajat I 101 3000] 1997] Indonesia IMandara Nusantara Ltd Wayang Winduitt 130] 3000] 1997| [Taiwan [Formosa Chemical and Fiber Corp. SK-14. 174) 3600} 1998} [Japan [Taiheiyou Cement ltoigawa 166] 3000} 1998} [Japan |UBE Power Center 240) 3600} 1998} India Venkatesh Coke & Power Ltd. 138 3000] 1999] Bangladesh [AES Haripur Private Ltd. 165) 3000] 1999} [Taiwan Formosa Chemical and Fiber Corp. LT72 203] 3600] 1999) [Taiwan [Chinese Petroleum Corp. #23 125) 3600] 1999} [Taiwan [Chinese Petroleum Corp. #24 125; 3600] 1999} Bangladesh [AES Meghnaghat Ltd. 238| 3000] 2000| Taiwan Formosa Chemical and Fiber Corp. G-8. 130] 3600 2000| [Malaysia [TNB Gelugor Power Station 130) 3000) 2000} Mexico |ENRON Vitro Alcali CCPP_ 127) 3600] 2000) Canada ICALPINE Calgary Energy Center Project 158 3600 2001 Brazil [Termonorte energia Ltda 138 3600 2001Operating Experience of Air Cooled Generator Name of Country Name of Project Rea ar etreel Rotating Saved | start-up Year | Operating Hours MW ro [ALS ( >100MVA) i Var Taranto 1291 103 1904] Zahrani 185| 148] 1995 [Poryeng_ 200 120] 1995/98] asiikos 173 138| 1997 Hai Fu = 208 171 1997] Ruwais T 210 168 1998| Burgin Kentucky 208| ” 1998 Kerman 200] 160] 1999 Jebel Ali 153| 122 1999 a Hassi Berkine 145| 7 1999 Pelican Point 210 168 1999 Hay Road 8 206) 185| 2000] Birr test center 300] 240 1904 arisruhe 300] 240] 1995 Rocksavage 300| 255) 1995| Boling 235| 200] 19097] [Agawam 280| 238] 1997] La Spezia 290 261 1997] Monterrey 20| 252] 1998 Ford/Rouge 280 238] 1998] sland Cogen 280 238 1908] CL [Midlothian 200] 238 1998|Operating Experience of Air Cooled Generator eee eee eee eee ee eee enters eter Rie Cee eer ae Name of Country Name of Project ane Output Rotarng Seed | start-up Year | Operating Hours eee SS ee OO arene ere | ICoryton 300| 255 1998] Puerto Rico 300] 255) 1999) [Stock generators 220] 233] 1998/99Operating Experience of Air Cooled Generator Name of Country Name of Project Rate “Gur Rotating Speed | start-up Year | Operating Hours SIE ( >250MVAY lee [United Kingdom [Didcot B 51 2915) 233 3000} 1996) [uniteaKingdom [Didoot B 52 2915 233, 3000| “986 United Kingdom _|Didcot B 61 291.5] 233 3000) -| United Kirigdom [Didcot B 62 291.5) 233 3000) a [argentina [Costanera 251] 219 3000] 1995] [Argentina [Generba STG 261 222 3000] + chile ~~ |Nehuenco GT 273] 232 3000 EI |Austria KW Theiss 2000 260} 221 3000) 1999} |Argentinia [CTCG Salta STG 2 270] 230 3000] + Malaysia Panglima GTG 11 303] 233 3000] -| Malaysia Panglima GTG 12 303] 233 3000) | Ireland |Huntstown GTG 288) 230 3000! 2002] \Viet Nam_ Phu My3-STG 10. 292! 263 3000) cs [italy Priolo Gargallo-Lot 8 { 288] 259 3000) | italy Priolo Gargallo-Lot 10 288) 259 3000} + Italy {Termini Lmerese-Lot 9 288 259) 3009] - Italy Termini Lmerese-Lot 11 288) 259 3000) iu italy ENEL Repowering 2a8| 259 3000] - United Arab Emirates |Shuweihat STG 10. 299| 254 | 3000) =| [United ArabEmirates |Shuweihat STG 20 299) 254 3000) i |United Arab.Emirates |Shuweihat GTG 11 262! 223 3000! i United Arab Emirates |Shuweihat GTG 12 262! 223, 3000) is: