Behavior-Based Media Planning
Behavior-Based Media Planning
Behavior-Based Media Planning
Digital Marketing
Insights
others like them. It may be the demographic or psychographic makeup of the site, a synergy between
the site’s content and your product category, or even a new class of customers that have found a
unique utility for your product. Whatever that “something” is, BBMP tools highlight associations
between your target group and site populations. BBMP tools work because:
1) They identify the sites and placements that maximize the probability of reaching your current
customer base.
2) By finding sites and placements with high concentrations of your customers, they increase the
likelihood of finding other potential customers like them.
3) Rather than building a model of your customers, your customers are your model. No abstraction
step is necessary. This saves time and money.
A key advantage of BBMP tools is that they use the entire universe of online customers to base site
recommendations. BBMP tools also help advertisers find “diamonds in the rough”—smaller and less
obvious sites that never would have been considered for the buy. This is especially valuable
considering that the majority of third-party planning tools only report on the overall populations of the
largest sites.
Behavior-Based Media Planning tools can be used in innovative ways to help a variety of companies
with different marketing models and goals. An example is companies whose primary online focus is
branding (i.e., their customers spend significant amounts of time online, but primarily purchase offline).
Since many such companies don’t garner significant site activity to identify detailed behavior-based
target groups, they are using surveys and promotions to identify their customers online.
Unlike broadcast media such as television, where Figure 1: Finding target customers on other sites
advertisers reach all the viewers of a given program, a
typical online media buy only reaches a fraction of a site’s overall visitors. Therefore, to maximize the
probability of reaching target customers, advertisers should choose sites with the highest concentrations
(highest percentage of impressions) of those target customers (Site B in the above example).
The Site Finder test involved six leading online advertisers. Sites recommended by Site Finder were
compared against sites that were chosen by media planners using traditional planning techniques. In
each case, the sites recommended by Site Finder were not sites that typically would have been chosen
through demographic or psychographic planning. Each advertiser had identified a primary conversion
on their website (e.g., page views, registrations and sales) and Cost per Primary Action (CPA) goals to
evaluate the results of the campaign.
What We Learned
The test campaigns ran for approximately four weeks. Post-campaign ROI analysis revealed that
across advertisers, Cost per Primary Action (CPA) of Site Finder recommended sites was 37% lower
than the other test sites. Furthermore, three-quarters of the sites found with Site Finder out-performed
the average performance of all test sites. These successes led the advertisers involved in the test to
renew advertising on 89% of the Site Finder-recommended sites.