Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 17 views

    Hello 112

    Uploaded by

    Hello123
    Two tenants filed petitions to change their status from tenants to leasehold tenants of a landowner under Section 14 of the Agricultural Tenancy Act. The landowner challenged the validity of this section in their answer. The Court of Agrarian Relations ultimately rejected the constitutional challenge and declared the relationship to be one of leasehold tenancy effective from the 1961-1962 agricultural year.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Hello 112

    Uploaded by

    Hello123
    17 views1 page
    Two tenants filed petitions to change their status from tenants to leasehold tenants of a landowner under Section 14 of the Agricultural Tenancy Act. The landowner challenged the validity of this section in their answer. The Court of Agrarian Relations ultimately rejected the constitutional challenge and declared the relationship to be one of leasehold tenancy effective from the 1961-1962 agricultural year.

    Original Title

    hello112

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Two tenants filed petitions to change their status from tenants to leasehold tenants of a landowner under Section 14 of the Agricultural Tenancy Act. The landowner challenged the validity of this section in their answer. The Court of Agrarian Relations ultimately rejected the constitutional challenge and declared the relationship to be one of leasehold tenancy effective from the 1961-1962 agricultural year.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    17 views1 page

    Hello 112

    Uploaded by

    Hello123
    Two tenants filed petitions to change their status from tenants to leasehold tenants of a landowner under Section 14 of the Agricultural Tenancy Act. The landowner challenged the validity of this section in their answer. The Court of Agrarian Relations ultimately rejected the constitutional challenge and declared the relationship to be one of leasehold tenancy effective from the 1961-1962 agricultural year.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    Two petitions were filed by now-respondents Victorino de los Santos and Tomas de los Santos

    before respondent Court of Agrarian Relations on April 28, 1961, manifesting their desire, as tenants
    of herein petitioner-landowner, Ernesto del Rosario, to take advantage of Section 14 and to adopt
    the leasehold system provided, thus changing their previous status as tenants. In the answer
    submitted on May 5, 1961, the validity of the above legal provision was challenged. It was not until
    October 26, 1962, that a decision was rendered by the Court of Agrarian Relations, rejecting the
    claim of unconstitutionality of the above section as without merit and declaring the relationship
    between respondent tenants and petitioner-landowner to be one of leasehold tenancy effective as of
    the agricultural year 1961-1962 in a joint decision on the two petitions filed before it. From the
    aforesaid joint decision, this petition for review was filed. As in the case of the proceedings before
    the Court of Agrarian Relations, a single opinion suffices to dispose of the matter and to reaffirm
    once again the constitutionality of Section 14 of the Agricultural Tenancy Act.

    You might also like