Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 156 views

    Historical Criticism Learning Activity RIPH

    Uploaded by

    Aimee Kaye Detablan
    This document summarizes and compares the historical sources of Monteclaro's Maragtas and Marco's contributions. It outlines the background of each source, the external and internal criticism techniques used to analyze them, and the findings and conclusions of the analyses. Monteclaro's Maragtas is considered a potential forgery or hoax due to similarities to Panay folktales. Meanwhile, Marco provided many historical documents but their authenticity is questioned by some historians due to mysteries in his life.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Historical Criticism Learning Activity RIPH

    Uploaded by

    Aimee Kaye Detablan
    156 views2 pages
    This document summarizes and compares the historical sources of Monteclaro's Maragtas and Marco's contributions. It outlines the background of each source, the external and internal criticism techniques used to analyze them, and the findings and conclusions of the analyses. Monteclaro's Maragtas is considered a potential forgery or hoax due to similarities to Panay folktales. Meanwhile, Marco provided many historical documents but their authenticity is questioned by some historians due to mysteries in his life.

    Original Title

    Historical Criticism learning Activity RIPH

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document summarizes and compares the historical sources of Monteclaro's Maragtas and Marco's contributions. It outlines the background of each source, the external and internal criticism techniques used to analyze them, and the findings and conclusions of the analyses. Monteclaro's Maragtas is considered a potential forgery or hoax due to similarities to Panay folktales. Meanwhile, Marco provided many historical documents but their authenticity is questioned by some historians due to mysteries in his life.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    156 views2 pages

    Historical Criticism Learning Activity RIPH

    Uploaded by

    Aimee Kaye Detablan
    This document summarizes and compares the historical sources of Monteclaro's Maragtas and Marco's contributions. It outlines the background of each source, the external and internal criticism techniques used to analyze them, and the findings and conclusions of the analyses. Monteclaro's Maragtas is considered a potential forgery or hoax due to similarities to Panay folktales. Meanwhile, Marco provided many historical documents but their authenticity is questioned by some historians due to mysteries in his life.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    You are on page 1of 2

    Historical Sources

    Historical Criticism
    Monteclaro’s Maragtas Contribution of Marco

    Monteclaro: Marco:
    Background of the person or
    persons where the material - Born in Miag-ao, Iloilo -Born in Marayo, Negros; now
    originated Pontevedra

    External criticism technique


    used -Provenance -Provenance

    -wrote Code of Rajah


    -copy taken from a bamboo Kalantiaw (1433)
    Findings tube
    -has many historical document
    -the paper was too brittle writings, but many historians
    including Scott, Schumacher,
    and Viana we’re more focused if
    the documents we’re fraudulent

    Internal criticism technique


    employed -verisimilitude -versimilitude

    -very similar with folktales


    Findings
    from Panay -life was full of mystery
    -many contributions, but also
    Conclusion -forgery, hoax? many suspicion on the
    authenticity of his works

    You might also like