Disciplinary Literacy Paper
Disciplinary Literacy Paper
Disciplinary Literacy Paper
Disciplinary Literacy
Samantha Alvarado
Disciplinary Literacy
improved on, and constantly observed. The levels of how this needs to occur depends on the
student, the teacher, the staff, the community in which they are in, the demographics, and other
things that affect them. One thing that needs to be emphasized is the fact that adolescent literacy
occurs both inside and outside of the classroom. Inside the classroom can be as simple as
instruction that applies to the aspect of literacy, and outside of the classroom can be a variety of
different activities such There are multiple methods to how this occurs as well where
through traditional means (e.g., bringing the outside in to your classroom—people, places,
things) or through the addition of augmented reality, virtual reality, or both” (2019, 2). Through
consistent and constant collaboration processes in different types of ways, adolescent literacy can
thrive and receive more growth that is needed for everyone as they progress in life.
directly to my content and to what else I decide to teach. English is the first subject that someone
would usually associate the aspect of literacy with. Literacy is crucial in meeting or excelling the
standards that are set in stone for the English subject that are taught. Being as English involves
reading and writing, the literacy process can be achieved and completed through various
assignments, projects, and other areas of work so that the students are able to feel as if they are
where they needed to be. If a student does not feel they belong where they are, it can become
difficult for them to achieve their goals as well as develop a better sense of adolescent literacy. In
an article by the International Literacy Association, they explain that “teachers cultivate these
modeling of high expectations; and requiring that all students be respected and valued, and that
they contribute to these principles” (2019, 2). With these expectations and standards set into
stone and emphasized as a vital component, students can stick by them and follow it to have a
One of the issues that could be involved in acquiring adolescent literacy is the
relationship between the instructor and the student. When high schoolers are at a certain age and
have a certain mindset, they can often go into school thinking that the teachers have the entire
authority over what they learn and how they’re supposed to learn it. In an article titled, “On
Students’ Rights to Their Own Texts: A Model of Teacher Response,” authors Brannon and
Knoblauch go on to explain that “The teacher-reader assumes…that the student writers have not
yet earned the authority that ordinarily compels readers to listen seriously to what writers have to
say…Student writers, then, are put into the awkward position of having to accommodate, not
only the personal intentions that guide their choice-making, but also the teacher-reader’s
expectations about how the assignment should be completed” (1982, 158). Although this text has
been written almost forty years ago, it still applies to the relationships between the students who
are writing and the teachers who are assigning the requirements for what should be written. This
applies to adolescent literacy as writing is a crucial component to become more literate citizens
of society as well as students spending the most time on their writing skills when in school. If the
relationship to the student and the teacher cannot be established in a positive way, the writer will
not make an improvement or any real progress in their journey of writing and in their
advancement of overall literacy. Part of their solution is to “replace our professional but still
idiosyncratic model of how writing ought to appear, and put in their place a less authoritarian
concern for how student texts make us respond as readers and whether those responses are
Disciplinary Literacy 4
congruent with the writers’ intentions or not” (1984, 161). I feel this can be extremely beneficial
in the progression of adolescent literacy because not only will the relationship between the
student and teacher improve, but it will also give students the opportunity to put more creativity
into what they want to write as well as how they perceive what the understanding of literacy is.
Another issue with adolescent literacy is the culturally responsive and linguistic aspect of
it. Some students are English language learners, which can sometimes not be taken into
consideration. Part of being an effective educator in that area is have lessons and activities that
can apply to the student and help them make connections along the way. Flint, Dollar & Stewart
support this in their article by saying “because a defining feature of newcomers is their language
distinction from the mainstream population, teachers must also consider a teaching style that is
linguistically responsive” (2019, 510). They offer a solution referenced from other scholars
called “translanguaging”, a process in which “multilingual people drawing from all of their
languages to make meaning and accomplish specific purposes, an act in which most bilinguals
regularly engage (García et al., 2017)” (2019, 510). This can easily involve things such as using
culturally related/responsive texts for students to read, having students complete activities
pertaining to their own culture, and facilitating opportunities where students can learn the content
that they can make a personal association with. Using this process allows students to build
relationships between the languages they learn or are currently learning with the content they are
being taught. When more connections are made, better comprehension of the given material is
reached, and a high level of adolescent literacy is achieved throughout their education.
The last issue with adolescent literacy that will be discussed in this paper is the fact that
technology is constantly advancing, especially during these times. When the COVID-19
pandemic had come into effect and forced many of us to attend virtual classes, we had no choice
Disciplinary Literacy 5
but to adapt to these changes and accept that this would be the norm for a while. Now that time
has progressed and we’re still currently in the pandemic, technology has been emphasized more
than ever, and at this point, it is expected of us to have the digital literacy skills required to
achieve adolescent literacy as well due to the amount of technology used in various activities,
projects, assignments, homework, and more. In her article, which was mainly directed towards
English language learners, Black suggests that “Using new technologies for collaborative inquiry
and content-creation activities also provide options for ELLs to use language and other modes of
representation for authentic communication with peers, teachers, and other experts that they may
encounter in their research and explorations…thus extending learning outside the classroom
walls…[it] can support ELL youth in developing identities as powerful learners, language users,
and as producers of their own social, cultural and ideological materials” (2009, 696). Utilizing
technology is already underway in many classes, and I feel it’ll continue on that way. We will no
longer be in a classroom environment where technology isn’t used, so providing those skills
earlier for students so they have a better understanding of how to use it in their advancement will
be beneficial in the long run. For English Language Learners, I think that part of the solution
should be to provide technology for them at all access points, especially for those who do not
have that advantage at home. If they don’t have these necessary skills available for them, then it
will be an overall difficult process to reach digital literacy and adolescent literacy.
Disciplinary Literacy 6
References
org.ezproxy1.lib.asu.edu/10.1598/JAAL.52.8.4
Brannon, L., & Knoblauch, C. (1982). On Students' Rights to Their Own Texts: A Model of
doi:10.2307/357623
Flint, P., Dollar, T., & Stewart, M. A. (2019). Hurdling Over Language Barriers: Building
org.ezproxy1.lib.asu.edu/10.1002/jaal.927