MLA v. NMFS - Complaint 2021
MLA v. NMFS - Complaint 2021
MLA v. NMFS - Complaint 2021
Plaintiff,
v.
JANET COIT,
in her official capacity as
Assistant Administrator for Fisheries,
National Marine Fisheries Service
1315 East-West Highway
Silver Spring, MD 20910
Defendants.
I. INTRODUCTION
1. The Maine lobster fishery is essential to Maine’s culture, heritage, and economy.
For more than 175 years, the fishery has supported communities and generations of families in
Maine, while ensuring that this important natural resource is sustainably harvested for
generations to come. This conscientious stewardship has been undeniably successful—the Maine
lobster stock continues to thrive at healthy levels and the fishery remains one of the most
2. Despite being a model for sustainability success, the Maine lobster fishery itself is
now endangered as a result of a misguided federal decision that is directly at odds with both the
best available science and ecological knowledge gained from the experience of fishermen.
biological opinion (the “2021 BiOp”), pursuant to the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), that
evaluates the impacts of multiple fishery management plans (including for the Maine lobster
fishery) on the North Atlantic right whale. Through a “Conservation Framework,” the 2021
BiOp mandates that U.S. fixed gear fisheries (including the Maine lobster fishery) implement
more conservation measures to achieve an additional 98% reduction in the incidence of “serious
injury and mortality” interactions between this fishing gear and North Atlantic right whales over
4. NMFS’s mandate ignores the reality that the Maine lobster fishery already has an
extremely low incidence of interactions with right whales due, in part, to a suite of mitigation
measures that have been implemented for many years. Reducing its already low impact by
another 98% is not possible without driving most of Maine’s harvesters out of business
permanently.
5. Should NMFS’s draconian mandate be imposed, the Maine lobster fishery will
not exist as we know it today and the opportunity for future generations to continue this proud
heritage will be lost. Lives and livelihoods will be uprooted, and a cultural tradition that has
existed for more than 175 years will be gone. To make matters worse, these tragic losses will be
for naught. NMFS will have accomplished no meaningful benefit to the North Atlantic right
whale because, as reflected in its 2021 BiOp and discussed below, NMFS failed to forthrightly
address the most significant causes of harm to North Atlantic right whales or to apply the best
available science.
6. Even though it is now being unjustifiably targeted by NMFS, the Maine lobster
fishery has long embraced, and continues to embrace, a strong desire to conserve and coexist
with the North Atlantic right whale. Indeed, the fishery has implemented measures over the past
two decades to reduce the risk it posed to North Atlantic right whales, including drastic
reductions in vertical lines, gear modifications, and effort reductions. These actions have come at
no small cost to lobstermen and were implemented with extremely high compliance by
lobstermen. And they have undeniably been successful as there has not been a single known
North Atlantic right whale entanglement with Maine lobster gear in almost two decades.
Moreover, there has never been a known North Atlantic right whale serious injury or mortality
patterns shows that the Maine lobster fishery will continue to pose very little risk to North
Atlantic right whales. Numerous independent scientists have demonstrated that changes in the
oceanic environment have pushed the migration path of right whales out of the Western Gulf of
Maine and squarely into heavily used waters in Canada—where whales feed and are routinely
entangled in snow crab fishing gear and struck by vessels, and where conservation measures
have lagged far behind those implemented in the Maine lobster fishery. This new information
establishes that North Atlantic right whales seldom migrate to, and even more rarely aggregate or
8. The 2021 BiOp is divorced from this reality. It is premised on the single
erroneous assumption that all fishing rope presents equally deadly risk to North Atlantic right
whales and, therefore, all rope must be eliminated regardless of what the best available
information actually shows about the relative risks to right whales. When operating upon this
false premise, the Maine lobster fishery becomes an easy regulatory target for NMFS because it
is the largest U.S. fishery addressed by the 2021 BiOp and, as such, has the most rope in the
water.
9. Because the 2021 BiOp is based on the simplistic and false premise that more
lobster rope in the water equals more risk to whales—regardless of gear type, location,
and whale behavior and distribution—it exaggerates and arbitrarily inflates the risk posed by the
Maine lobster fishery. Even worse, NMFS erroneously attributes impacts to the Maine lobster
fishery that are, in fact, caused by other fisheries (such as the Canadian snow crab fishery) or by
non-fishing vessels that are well-known to strike and kill North Atlantic right whales. NMFS
relies on these demonstrably incorrect assumptions and attributions to justify its plan to squeeze
the fishery down to reach an artificially derived risk reduction factor of 98%.
10. Unfortunately, these punishing measures will provide no appreciable benefit for
the North Atlantic right whale while at the same time decimating the Maine lobster fishery.
Eliminating the Maine lobster fishery will not end right whale deaths in Canada or vessel strikes.
The 2021 BiOp truly accomplishes a “lose-lose” situation for whales and the lobster fishery. This
regrettable result is the quintessential example of unlawful agency decision-making that long ago
caused the Supreme Court to admonish federal agencies to adhere to the ESA’s “best available
officials zealously but unintelligently pursuing their environmental objectives.” Bennett v. Spear,
preservation of a sustainable lobster resource, and to the fishermen and communities that depend
on the Maine lobster fishery. MLA has proactively worked to develop, and consistently
supported, conservation measures for the North Atlantic right whale based on sound science.
But, as described above and in the allegations that follow, the 2021 BiOp is neither sound
science nor lawful. The 2021 BiOp’s failure to identify, present, and apply the best available
science to its assessment of the North Atlantic right whale unfairly and arbitrarily places useless
12. MLA brings this lawsuit because NMFS’s imposition of draconian measures on
the Maine lobster fishery will not halt the decline of the North Atlantic right whale while
simultaneously resulting in a devastating economic hardship on the more than 4,800 individually
owned and operated lobster fishing vessels and the tens of thousands of jobs they support, all of
which are essential to Maine’s economy and irreplaceable aspects of the State’s coastal and
maritime heritage.
13. Defendants’ approval of the 2021 BiOp is unlawful because NMFS did not rely
on the best available scientific information, made erroneous and arbitrary assumptions
unsupported and contradicted by data and evidence, relied on an outdated and flawed
methodology to model projections of the North Atlantic right whale population, and inexplicably
failed to account for either the positive impact of mitigation measures already or soon-to-be
employed by the Maine lobster fishery. NMFS also ignored or arbitrarily discounted evidence
submitted by MLA and others that would have enabled the agency to correct its mistakes.
14. The 2021 BiOp is already impacting the Maine lobster fishery. On September 17,
2021, NMFS issued a final rule amending the regulations implementing the Atlantic Large
Whale Take Reduction Plan (the “TRP Rule”), which included, inter alia, a fishing closure
(termed the “LMA 1 Seasonal Restricted Area”) applicable to participants in the Maine lobster
fishery. 86 Fed. Reg. 51,970 (Sept. 17, 2021). This closure applies to a large area of productive
fishing grounds where right whale sightings have not been documented. NMFS relied on the
2021 BiOp to comply with ESA Section 7 when it issued the TRP Rule.
15. MLA seeks an order from the Court declaring that NMFS’s 2021 BiOp and the
TRP Rule are arbitrary, capricious and in violation of the ESA, 16 U.S.C. §§ 1361–1389, and the
Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. §§ 701–706, and remanding the 2021 BiOp
16. The Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (federal
question arising under the laws of the United States) and under 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (actions against
17. Venue in this Court is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391 because this action is
brought against an agency of the United States and officers of the United States acting in their
official capacities and because Defendants maintain offices in the District of Columbia.
III. PARTIES
A. Plaintiff
18. Plaintiff MLA is a private, not-for-profit trade association representing more than
1,200 lobster harvesters who fish in the waters off the Maine coast. Founded in 1954, MLA is the
oldest and largest fishing industry association on the east coast. MLA and its members are
committed to the preservation of a sustainable lobster resource and the fishermen and
communities that depend on it. MLA has provided a credible voice for the Maine lobster industry
on marine resource management issues and is highly regarded by stakeholders in the health of
19. MLA brings this lawsuit on behalf of its members, who fish in waters subject to
20. MLA has been actively and diligently involved in efforts to protect the North
Atlantic right whale population. For decades, MLA has been working in earnest with NMFS, the
communities, and other stakeholders. MLA has been an industry leader in the development and
minimize risk to right whales when they are present in waters fished by Maine lobstermen.
21. MLA members fish in waters subject to NMFS’s 2021 BiOp issued under the
ESA as well as NMFS’s Atlantic Large Whale Take Reduction Plan (“TRP” or “Take Reduction
Plan”) issued under the Marine Mammal Protection Act (“MMPA”). MLA’s members engage in
fishing practices authorized under the TRP, including the TRP Rule, and the 2021 BiOp. MLA
members also fish in Maine’s coastal waters that are exempted from the TRP due to the
extremely low probability of North Atlantic right whale impacts in those areas (but where
22. MLA and its members have collaborated with scientists in developing and testing
fishing gear to reduce the risk of entanglement over many decades. Beginning in the 1990s,
MLA partnered with NMFS’s gear team to measure gear profiles, test “weak links” below the
buoy, and explore other gear modifications. MLA also worked with researchers in the 2000s to
establish methods and standards to deploy weak links, develop buoy line marking methods,
deploy remotely operated vehicles and sensors to measure groundline rope profiles, and test a
variety of vertical line modifications such as weak rope, stiff rope, glow rope and time tension
line cutters. Since 2010, MLA and its members have worked with scientists to publish a resource
describing lobster gear and configurations deployed in the New England lobster fishery, map
lobster fishing effort in Maine, develop a fishing gear/right whale risk model, document wear
issues associated with sinking groundlines and methods to improve wear of those lines, identify
options for best fishing practices, test colored vertical lines as a deterrent, measure the breaking
strength of existing vertical lines, develop and test methods to weaken rope, develop time tension
23. Over the past decade, the Maine lobster fishery has substantially reduced the risk
it once presented to North Atlantic right whales through implementation of risk reduction
measures. The best available data show that those measures have been effective at reducing
24. MLA’s members are on the front line of right whale protection efforts in the Gulf
of Maine because they are responsible for implementation of harvesting practices designed to
reduce potentially harmful interactions between right whales and lobster fishing gear. Maine’s
lobster harvesters have made multiple changes in the deployment of fishing gear that have
demonstrably reduced the risk of harm to right whales in the Gulf of Maine. As stewards of the
marine environment, Maine lobstermen’s compliance with these measures is very high.
25. MLA and its members derive economic, professional, aesthetic, and cultural
benefits from the Maine lobster fishery. Defendants’ promulgation of the 2021 BiOp and TRP
Rule based on faulty science and assumptions in violation of the ESA and APA has caused and
continues to cause economic, aesthetic, cultural and procedural injury to MLA and its members’
interests in the Maine lobster fishery through the imposition of arbitrary risk reduction targets
and mandating superfluous current and future obligations to reduce North Atlantic right whale
fishing gear interactions. MLA and MLA’s members’ injuries will be redressed by the relief they
request, as that relief would undo the causes of those actual and threatened injuries. MLA and its
B. Defendants
26. Defendant Gina Raimondo is the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Commerce
and is sued in her official capacity. Secretary Raimondo directs all business of the Department of
Commerce and is the official ultimately responsible under federal law for ensuring that the
actions and decisions of the Department comply with all applicable laws and regulations.
27. Defendant Janet Coit is Deputy Administrator of the National Oceanic and
Coit has responsibility for implementing and fulfilling the agency’s duties under the ESA.
28. Defendant NMFS is an agency within the U.S. Department of Commerce and is
sometimes referred to as NOAA Fisheries. NMFS is the agency to which the Secretary of
Commerce has delegated authority to manage productive and sustainable fisheries and to
29. The ESA protects imperiled species by providing the implementing agencies with
it “is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range.” 16 U.S.C. §
1532(6). A species is “threatened” if it “is likely to become an endangered species within the
foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range.” Id. § 1532(20).
30. Additionally, Section 7(a)(2) of the ESA requires federal agencies to “insure that
any action authorized, funded, or carried out by such agency . . . is not likely to jeopardize the
continued existence of any” listed species or result in the “destruction or adverse modification”
of designated critical habitat. Id. § 1536(a)(2). NMFS does so by issuing a biological opinion. 50
C.F.R. § 402.14(g)(4).
31. To comply with Section 7(a)(2)’s substantive mandate, federal agencies must
consult with NMFS when their actions “may affect” a listed marine species. 16 U.S.C. §
1536(a)(2). The agencies must utilize the “best scientific and commercial data available” during
the consultation process. Id.; 50 C.F.R. § 402.14(f), (g)(8). If NMFS determines that the agency
action is likely to jeopardize the species, the opinion may specify reasonable and prudent
alternatives that will avoid jeopardy and allow the agency to proceed with the action. 16 U.S.C. §
1536(b)(3). The agencies may also “suggest modifications” to the action during the course of
consultation to “avoid the likelihood of adverse effects” to the listed species even when not
32. A biological opinion that concludes that the agency action is not likely to
jeopardize the continued existence of a listed species but will result in “take” incidental to the
agency action must include an incidental take statement. 16 U.S.C. § 1536(b)(4). Among other
requirements, an incidental take statement must specify any “reasonable and prudent measures”
that NMFS considers necessary or appropriate to minimize the impact of any incidental take as
well as “terms and conditions” to implement those measures. Id.; 50 C.F.R. § 402.14(i).
33. The MMPA, like the ESA, generally prohibits the “taking” of marine mammals.
16 U.S.C. § 1371(a). Commercial fishing operations, however, may incidentally take marine
mammals provided that they comply with the requirements of the MMPA. 16 U.S.C. § 1387.
34. The MMPA’s protective standards are qualitatively more stringent than the ESA’s
standards and more protective of marine mammals. One of the MMPA’s most precautionary
conservation metrics is the “potential biological removal level.” 16 U.S.C. § 1362(20). The
potential biological removal level is the “maximum number of animals, not including natural
mortalities, that may be removed from a marine mammal stock while allowing that stock to reach
or maintain its optimum sustainable population.” Id. “Optimum sustainable population,” in turn,
means “with respect to any population stock, the number of animals which will result in the
maximum productivity of the population or the species, keeping in mind the carrying capacity of
the habitat and the health of the ecosystem of which they form a constituent element.” Id. §
1362(9).
35. The MMPA imposes additional conservation measures for “strategic stocks.”
Strategic stocks include those marine mammals that are listed as threatened or endangered under
the ESA, as well as those stocks where the human-caused mortality exceeds the potential
biological removal level. Id. § 1362(19). The MMPA authorizes, and, in some cases, requires
NMFS to “develop and implement a take reduction plan designed to assist in the recovery or
prevent the depletion” of strategic stocks that interact with commercial fisheries. Id. § 1387(f)(1).
The take reduction plan is developed by the take reduction team, which is established by NMFS
36. The APA governs judicial review of federal agency actions. 5 U.S.C. §§ 701–706.
37. Under the APA, courts “shall . . . hold unlawful and set aside agency action,
not in accordance with law” or made “without observance of procedure required by law.” Id. §
38. Suits against the government for maladministration of the ESA are properly
brought under the APA. See Conservation Force v. Salazar, 753 F. Supp. 2d 29 (D.D.C. 2010).
subject to review under the APA. See Bennett, 520 U.S. at 178.
V. BACKGROUND
40. The Maine lobster fishery is one of the oldest continuously operated industries in
the United States. With the advent of canning, Maine established the first commercial lobster
fishery in the 1840s. In the intervening 180 years, the tradition of lobstering has been passed
down for generations and is a cornerstone of Maine’s culture, heritage, and economy.
41. The Maine lobster fishery has long prided itself on being a sustainable industry.
The fishery adopted rules in the late 1800s to protect the resource and prevent overfishing by
restricting the fishery to trap gear, banning the catch of and protecting egg-bearing female
lobsters, and restricting the size of lobsters that may be retained. Through these and other
conservation measures, the lobster fishery remains vibrant today and is one of the country’s most
valuable commercial fisheries. In 2020 alone, over $405 million worth of lobster was caught off
the coast of Maine. For rural coastal communities in Maine, the lobster fishery is the economic
42. The Maine lobster fishery supports tens of thousands of jobs and hundreds of
ancillary businesses. Maine’s lobster fleet directly supports more than 10,000 jobs—including
3,670 captains, up to 5,750 crew, and 1,095 students. Maine’s wholesale lobster distribution
supply chain is estimated to contribute an additional $967 million and 5,500 jobs.
43. In the early 1890s, commercial whalers hunted North Atlantic right whales to the
brink of extinction. As a result, the North Atlantic right whale has been listed as endangered
under the ESA or its predecessor act since 1970. The Maine lobster industry recognizes the need
for conservation of the North Atlantic right whale, and Maine lobstermen have taken proactive
steps to ensure that the lobster fishery and North Atlantic right whales can coexist.
44. Since the inception of the Atlantic Large Whale Take Reduction Team (“Take
Reduction Team”) in the mid-1990s, MLA has been a leader in federal and state efforts to
preserve and protect the health of the North Atlantic right whale population when the animals
transit the waters off the Maine coast. MLA has been a key player in the development and
45. MLA’s members are on the front lines of right whale protection efforts in the Gulf
of Maine because they are responsible for implementing harvesting practices designed to reduce
potentially harmful interactions between right whales and lobster fishing gear. Maine’s lobster
harvesters have made many changes in the deployment of harvesting gear, including removing
all floating line from the surface, incorporating “weak links” into buoy lines, deploying sinking
groundlines in non-exempt waters, and significantly reducing the amount of vertical lines in the
water column by adding more traps per end-line. These measures have combined to
demonstrably reduce the risk of harm to right whales from the lobster fishery in the Gulf of
Maine. Maine lobstermen also mark their buoys and end-lines to aid in identifying the origin of
fishing gear if it were to entangle a whale despite these mitigation efforts. The State of Maine
implemented new lobster gear marking regulations in 2020 that expand and enhance gear
marking requirements beyond what has been required under the TRP.
46. There has never been a known North Atlantic right whale serious injury or
lawsuit challenging the biological opinion issued by NMFS in 2014 (the “2014 BiOp”) regarding
effects of the American Lobster Fishery on the North Atlantic right whale. Those groups alleged
that the 2014 BiOp violated the ESA, the MMPA, and the APA.
48. Shortly after the lawsuit challenging the 2014 BiOp was filed, MLA intervened in
49. On April 9, 2020, the District Court for the District of Columbia issued a decision
invalidating NMFS’s 2014 BiOp. Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. Ross, No. CV 18-112 (JEB),
2020 WL 1809465 (D.D.C. Apr. 9, 2020). Although the Court vacated a portion of the 2014
BiOp pertaining to the North Atlantic right whale, the Court stayed its order for nine months
until May 31, 2021, thereby allowing the lobster fishery to continue operating and providing
NMFS additional time to complete work on a new biological opinion and a new MMPA rule.
Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. Ross, 480 F. Supp. 3d 236 (D.D.C. Aug. 19, 2020).
50. NMFS initiated the Section 7 consultation leading to the draft biological opinion
(“Draft BiOp”) against the backdrop of an unusual mortality event declared in mid-2017—which
of improvement in the prospects for recovery of the North Atlantic right whale. The right whale
population had nearly doubled under the guidance of the Take Reduction Team and the
associated TRP implemented by NMFS pursuant to Section 118(f) of the MMPA, reflecting two
develop and implement innovative fishing practices and gear strategies to reduce interactions
51. On October 1, 2019, MLA requested that NMFS grant MLA “applicant status,”
pursuant to ESA Section 7, for the consultation that led to the issuance of the 2021 BiOp. On
October 24, 2019, NMFS denied MLA’s request for applicant status.
52. NMFS released the Draft BiOp on January 15, 2021. MLA, along with 11 other
lobster fishing associations and stakeholders representing active participants in the American
Lobster Fishery as well as the individuals and organizations that rely upon the fishery, submitted
detailed comments, identifying significant concerns associated with the data and analyses
presented in the Draft BiOp. MLA’s comments also made recommendations for additional data
and analyses to be considered and undertaken by NMFS to ensure that the decision complies
53. On May 27, 2021, NMFS released the final 2021 BiOp. The deficiencies and
concerns identified by MLA and other commenters on the draft 2021 BiOp were not addressed
by NMFS in the final 2021 BiOp. These deficiencies include, but are not limited to, the
following.
54. In the 2021 BiOp, for the purpose of apportioning “risk” levels, NMFS
determined that all fishing gear entanglements with North Atlantic right whales of “unknown”
origin should be equally allocated (50:50) between the U.S. and Canada. This determination is
one of the most significant unsupported assumptions in the 2021 BiOp because the vast majority
of all right whale serious injury and mortality entanglements attributed to the American Lobster
Fishery are either cases with no fishing gear at all or involve fishing gear of unknown origin,
most of which does not have the characteristics of Maine lobster gear. Moreover, in recent years,
most right whale serious injury and mortality entanglements involving fishing gear of known
origin involve Canadian fishing gear. NMFS’s apportionment of risk levels is arbitrary and
contrary to the best available scientific and commercial information for these and the following
reasons as well as other reasons brought to NMFS’s attention in comments on the draft 2021
BiOp.
55. The best available data show an increasing trend in known right whale
mortality, with Canadian fishing gear. At the same time, known entanglements in U.S. fisheries,
particularly the Maine lobster fishery, have decreased, with none being observed in the Maine
lobster fishery in over 17 years. The 2021 BiOp erroneously discounts the value of known
entanglement trends despite NMFS’s own data showing that many of all known whale
entanglements have been confirmed to a specific country of origin from 2016 to 2019. The 2021
BiOp’s treatment of the data for known fishery interactions is arbitrary and unsupported.
56. NMFS incorrectly relied on a general assumption that right whales spend more
time in U.S. waters than in Canadian waters and that right whales would be equally at risk of
entanglement in either country. There are no data to support this assumption. In so doing, NMFS
arbitrarily discounted or ignored the fact that the best available science demonstrates that North
Atlantic right whales have shifted their migratory routes away from Maine lobster fishing
grounds and into Canadian fishing grounds that right whales reach without transiting the Maine
lobster fishery. NMFS also arbitrarily failed to consider the risk to right whales during
occupancy of fishing grounds and, instead, considered assumed risk to the animals in all waters
(regardless of whether fishing occurs in those waters). For example, right whale residency time
in more southern locations in the U.S. is not indicative of the entanglement risk of the Maine
lobster fishery, which is located well to the north of U.S. coastal areas where North Atlantic right
57. Canada had few, if any, risk reduction measures in place prior to 2017, whereas
U.S. fisheries implemented measures dating back to 1999, including conservation enhancements
in 2009 and 2014 that significantly reduced the amount of rope in the Gulf of Maine. And
although the 2021 BiOp acknowledges that the rapidly expanding Canadian snow crab fishery
uses heavier and more lethal gear, it fails to attribute a higher risk to this gear. The 2021 BiOp
fails to properly account for these relevant factors. Moreover, recent analyses indicate that
Canadian mitigation measures have been less effective than U.S. measures that were first
implemented in 2009. Thus, NMFS overestimated the risk posed by the Maine lobster fishery
58. The 2021 BiOp also fails to address the difference in observation effort between
Canadian and U.S. waters. Survey effort in U.S. waters has historically been significantly greater
than in Canadian waters. As a result, entanglement events in Canadian waters were likely under-
sampled prior to 2017, the year when survey effort in Canada was increased with the assistance
of NMFS.
59. Formal peer reviewers of modeling conducted in support of the 2021 BiOp and
federal scientists have acknowledged the lack of scientific basis for NMFS’s arbitrary 50:50
allocation of unknown-origin entanglements between Canada and the U.S., emphasizing that the
established shift in right whale migratory routes into previously unregulated areas has resulted in
an increase in entanglements, including serious injury and mortality, in Canadian trap/pot gear.
Experts and scientists have concluded that the largest current entanglement threat to North
Atlantic right whales is posed by Canadian snow crab fishing gear. Indeed, the Atlantic Scientific
Review Group recently recommended that NMFS reassess its 50:50 apportionment of right
whale mortality between the U.S. and Canada. The 2021 BiOp directly conflicts with these
60. The 2021 BiOp erroneously and arbitrarily places undue emphasis on the quantity
of vertical lines in the water when assigning risk to fisheries, and arbitrarily discounts (a) trends
within and among gear types associated with right whale entanglements, (b) right whale
geographic and temporal occurrence, (c) right whale behavior, (d) the location and timing of
different fisheries and gears fished, and (e) relative threats from different gear types based on
61. The result of NMFS’s arbitrary and unsupported determination to apportion right
whale entanglements with fishing gear of unknown origin equally between the U.S. and Canada
is that the 2021 BiOp assigns risk (and therefore impact) to the Maine lobster fishery that, in fact,
derives from Canadian fisheries. The 2021 BiOp is therefore premised on an assumption that the
Maine lobster fishery causes more impact to the North Atlantic right whale than is otherwise
62. NMFS arbitrarily allocated the U.S. portion of all North Atlantic right whale
entanglements of unknown origin to the American Lobster Fishery, contrary to the best available
information, which indisputably shows that right whales are entangled with U.S. fishing gear
63. The 2021 BiOp arbitrarily ignores data showing that, after accounting for
confirmed gear types suggest that right whales are nearly twice as likely to be entangled in
fishing gear other than lobster gear. The 2021 BiOp arbitrarily ignores or discounts data showing
that, in addition to entanglement risk, the potential of a severe entanglement is greater for non-
lobster gear. It also arbitrarily ignores data in entanglement cases where the fishery that is the
source of the entanglement cannot be determined but the Maine lobster fishery can be ruled out
as the source.
64. The 2021 BiOp arbitrarily fails to address the potential for a right whale to shed
lobster versus non-lobster gear, which is highly relevant considering that scarring data indicate
that whales break free of fishing gear on their own in the majority of incidents, and two-thirds of
all entanglement events are minor and do not result in serious injury to the individual whale.
NMFS’s data on documented entanglements also show that nearly half of all whale entanglement
65. The 2021 BiOp erroneously and arbitrarily places undue emphasis on the quantity
of gear in the water when assigning risk among U.S. fisheries and arbitrarily fails to analyze
differences between lobster and non-lobster fisheries with respect to the potential to cause
mortality and serious injury due to the nature of the gear or to whale behavioral patterns.
66. The result of NMFS’s arbitrary and unsupported determination to allocate all risk
indisputable evidence to the contrary—is that the 2021 BiOp assigns risk (and therefore impact)
to the Maine lobster fishery that, in fact, derives from other fisheries. The 2021 BiOp is therefore
premised on an assumption that the Maine lobster fishery causes more impact to the North
Atlantic right whale than is otherwise demonstrated by the best available scientific and
commercial information.
67. The 2021 BiOp relies on a Conservation Framework that is fundamentally flawed.
The Conservation Framework includes four phases over 10 years and expects and requires the
Maine lobster fishery to ultimately achieve a 98% reduction in North Atlantic right whale
mortality and serious injury at the end of phase four. The Conservation Framework (a) inflates
the amount of take attributable to the Maine lobster fishery with overly conservative or erroneous
assumptions, (b) fails to fully account for and incorporate the benefits from risk reduction
measures from early phases of the Conservation Framework, and (c) requires the Maine lobster
0.136 average annual mortalities or serious injuries. This figure is arbitrary and unsupported by
science or the law. NMFS provides no explanation supporting this metric or showing how it was
calculated. NMFS’s requirement that the mortality and serious injury rate “needs to be reduced”
to 0.136 to achieve a “no jeopardy” determination has no precedent in the law, science, or
practice, and arbitrarily demands a result that exceeds the requirements of both the ESA and the
MMPA.
69. Even if it were possible to reduce the jeopardy inquiry to a single metric, there is
no rational basis for NMFS to conclude that a mortality and serious injury rate of approximately
one-eighth of the established “potential biological removal” rate established under the MMPA is
70. Regulating the Maine lobster fishery down to an annual mortality and serious
injury rate of 0.136 from the over-inflated impact rates attributed to the fishery under the 2021
BiOp would mean the economic decimation, if not elimination, of the fishery. Moreover,
NMFS’s imposition of this metric is inconsistent with and undermines the MMPA’s long-term
take reduction planning goal, which expressly requires that take reduction plans consider impacts
on fishery economics. The establishment of an imposed metric that exceeds requirements to meet
MMPA goals and likely renders a fishery economically non-viable far exceeds NMFS’s
obligations and authority, and is arbitrary, ultra vires, and otherwise contrary to law. The 2021
4. NMFS failed to account for known causes of North Atlantic right whale
mortality and arbitrarily assigned all cryptic mortality to anthropogenic
causes.
among North Atlantic right whales. This assumption ignores published scientific literature that
documents two natural sources of right whale mortality—predation by a growing white shark
population on right whale calves and recent unfavorable oceanographic conditions resulting from
climate change.
underestimating the reproductive capacity of the North Atlantic right whale species and ability of
73. The effect of NMFS’s arbitrary decision to ignore natural sources of mortality is
anthropogenic sources. This, in turn, caused NMFS to erroneously overestimate the impact of the
74. NMFS arbitrarily assumed that North Atlantic right whales are at risk of
entanglement from lobster gear at any time when they are in U.S. waters, even when they are
documented in large numbers in U.S. waters distant from the Maine lobster fishery and even in
Maine waters where survey effort revealed rare presence of whales. This also caused NMFS to
erroneously overestimate the impact of the Maine lobster fishery on the North Atlantic right
whale.
75. NMFS failed to properly account for the mitigation measures that the American
Lobster Fishery, including the Maine lobster fishery, has implemented over more than two
decades.
reduced risk of right whale entanglement in U.S. lobster fishing gear. Regulations developed and
imposed at the state and federal level, including those implemented under the TRP, have
significantly reduced both the amount of lobster fishing gear in the water and the risk of a severe
77. The regulated waters of the American Lobster Fishery converted to “sinking
groundline” under the TRP in 2009. This requirement precludes the use of rope that floats
between lobster traps, which eliminates the potential for whale entanglement in floating lines
near the ocean bottom. This requirement removed over 27,000 miles of rope from New England
waters.
78. The American Lobster Fishery also implemented a “vertical line reduction” under
the TRP in 2014, which established minimum traps per buoy line based on geographic area and
distance from shore, resulting in the removal of approximately 2,740 miles of rope from New
England waters.
79. In 2015, the TRP regulations established a more than 3,000-square mile
“Massachusetts Restricted Area,” spanning Cape Cod Bay, Massachusetts Bay, and outer Cape
Cod, which has been closed to lobster gear from February 1 to April 30 annually to reduce
80. Additionally, a suite of universal gear requirements and modifications has been in
place for more than 20 years to reduce entanglement risk to right whales. These requirements
prohibit the use of floating line at the surface, require gear to be hauled at least every 30 days,
and require the incorporation of weak links in the top of the buoy line and any attachments along
the buoy line. Federally regulated fixed-gear fishermen are required to mark vertical lines to aid
in identifying the source of gear involved in an entanglement. In 2020, Maine implemented new
81. The American Lobster Fishery has reduced fishing effort across all jurisdictions
since the inception of the TRP. For example, Area 3 under the TRP has implemented mandatory
annual trap allocation limits of 5% per year, Massachusetts has a long-standing moratorium on
lobster licenses, and Maine established a limited-entry program, all of which has resulted in a
82. The best available scientific and commercial data demonstrate that
implementation of protective and mitigative measures by U.S. lobster fishermen has significantly
reduced impacts and risk to North Atlantic right whales from lobster gear. Although the 2021
BiOp acknowledges that “risk reduction measures implemented in U.S. fisheries over the past
two decades have reduced impacts to [North Atlantic right whales] from U.S. fisheries,” NMFS
arbitrarily failed to account for the benefits of such measures in the environmental baseline.
7. The 2021 BiOp does not properly account for the benefits of weak links in
fishing lines.
83. NMFS failed to account for the full benefits associated with the use of “weak
links” or “weak points” in fishing lines to be required under the TRP Rule. In addition to
allowing a whale to break free of the gear, this mitigation measure will reduce the severity of any
entanglements that occur, decreasing the risk of right whale serious injury and mortality,
reducing stress on the animal, and enhancing the future health of the population. Published
scientific literature, ignored by NMFS’s analysis, finds that the use of weak links and points in
fishing ropes can substantially reduce impacts to North Atlantic right whales.
84. The American Lobster Fishery, including the Maine lobster fishery, implements
weak links below the buoy and will include weak points in vertical rope under the TRP Rule.
The 2021 BiOp arbitrarily discounts and fails to properly account for the benefits of doing so.
8. The 2021 BiOp relies upon flawed and inaccurate population modeling.
85. The 2021 BiOp relies on an outdated modeling methodology that cannot reliably
86. The Linden (2021) study relied on by NMFS in making population projections
has numerous flaws that seriously undermine the 2021 BiOp’s reliance on this model.
87. The Linden (2021) model is overly sensitive to new data, improperly
parameterizes calving rates, improperly assumes an equal sex ratio, improperly assumes constant
and unfavorable environmental conditions will persist for 50 years, and improperly finds that
adult survival has the greatest potential effect on growth rate. As another example, Linden (2021)
entirely fails to incorporate or otherwise properly address improvements to the right whale
population by reducing mortalities to non-serious injuries. The consequence of these and many
other errors brought to NMFS’s attention is that the model relied upon by NMFS underestimates
North Atlantic right whale stock size under all three scenarios evaluated and overestimates the
88. NMFS’s erroneous reliance on the flawed Linden (2021) model is exacerbated by
the lack of quantitative assessment of model performance, and the “retrospective validation” of
89. NMFS admittedly relies on worst-case scenario assumptions by using, inter alia:
a limited and non-representative time period of 2010–2019, which includes a spatial shift in the
right whale forage base and the time when the species was struggling to adapt to this change; the
all-time low reproductive rate (while arbitrarily excluding the all-time high calving rate by just
one year); and a period of unusually high vessel strikes and a spike in entanglement in Canadian
snow crab gear. NMFS then presumes those conditions will continue to be representative into the
future.
90. Furthermore, NMFS arbitrarily selected data from the 2010–2019 time period and
assumed that unfavorable trends in oceanographic conditions would continue but did not take a
similar approach with trends in observed data on the sources of entanglements. These latter
more entanglements are due to Canadian fisheries and, in the U.S., that more entanglements
result from non-lobster gear. NMFS’s selective and inconsistent use of this data is arbitrary.
the 2021 BiOp relies on modeling techniques that do not accurately capture the risk within and
among gear types and rigging methods or changes in risk due to changes in North Atlantic right
whale behavior. This flawed modeling also caused NMFS to arbitrarily allocate assumed risk and
impacts to the Maine lobster fishery contrary to the best available information.
FIRST CLAIM: The 2021 BiOp Arbitrarily, Capriciously, and Unlawfully Overestimates
Impact and Risk from the American Lobster Fishery
92. Plaintiff incorporates by reference each of the allegations set forth above in
93. Section 7 of the ESA requires NMFS to issue a biological opinion that evaluates
the effects of an action based on an objective assessment of the “reasonably certain” effects of
that action on threatened or endangered species and related critical habitat. 16 U.S.C. §
occur”). A biological opinion must also properly account for the environmental baseline, which
“includes the past and present impacts of all Federal, State, or private actions and other human
activities in the action area, the anticipated impacts of all proposed Federal projects in the action
area that have already undergone formal or early section 7 consultation, and the impact of State
or private actions which are contemporaneous with the consultation in process.” 50 C.F.R. §
94. In evaluating the effects of the action, NMFS must use the “best scientific and
commercial data” when developing a biological opinion. 16 U.S.C. § 1536(a)(2). The “obvious
purpose” of this requirement “is to ensure that the ESA not be implemented haphazardly, on the
basis of speculation or surmise,” particularly when doing so would cause “needless economic
95. As set forth above and in MLA’s comments on the Draft BiOp, NMFS, when
assessing and determining the effects of the American Lobster Fishery on the North Atlantic
right whale, failed to use the best available scientific or commercial information. NMFS further
inflated the alleged negative effects of the American Lobster Fishery, including the Maine
experts. These errors include, but are not limited to, the 2021 BiOp’s (1) allocation of
unknown fishing gear to the lobster fishery, (3) reliance on the flawed Conservation Framework,
(4) failure to account for natural mortality, (5) erroneous assumptions about the risk of
entanglement when whales are not present in the lobster fishery, (6) failure to account for
mitigation measures, (7) failure to account for the benefit of weak links, (8) reliance on
inaccurate and outdated population modeling, (9) reliance on worst-case scenarios, and (10) use
of inaccurate modeling techniques. These errors resulted in arbitrary calculations of assumed risk
96. NMFS’s failure to rely on, or properly apply, the best available commercial and
scientific information, along with the repeated and compounding effects of NMFS’s erroneous
and unsupported assumptions, caused NMFS to substantially overestimate the alleged negative
effects of the American Lobster Fishery on the North Atlantic right whale and to mischaracterize
the environmental baseline. This violates NMFS’s obligation to evaluate the environmental
baseline and the reasonably certain effects of the American Lobster Fishery, in violation of the
not in accordance with law, in violation of the APA. 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A), (C), (D).
98. Plaintiff incorporates by reference each of the allegations set forth above in
99. The 2021 BiOp compounds the errors in overestimating the effects of the
American Lobster Fishery, including the Maine lobster fishery, on the North Atlantic right whale
and contrary to scientific evidence or analysis. As set forth above, the Conservation Framework
requires the American Lobster Fishery to achieve a 98% reduction in serious injury and mortality
events, reducing the annual level to 0.136 events per year. This annual level of 0.136 serious
injury and mortality events has no scientific basis, is a fraction of the existing “potential
biological removal” level under the MMPA, and far exceeds anything needed to avoid
jeopardizing the continued existence of the North Atlantic right whale or to avoid adversely
100. NMFS’s imposition of the Conservation Framework’s risk reduction targets in the
2021 BiOp and its stated intent to impose fishing closures and restrictions to achieve those
targets are not based on the best available scientific and commercial information under the ESA
and are arbitrary, capricious, and an abuse of discretion under the APA.
101. The Conservation Framework’s risk reduction targets also violate the ESA
because they exceed NMFS’s authority under the ESA, and are ultra vires. NMFS has the
authority to impose “reasonable and prudent measures” under the ESA that are “necessary or
appropriate to minimize” the “impact” of the taking caused by the action under review. 16
U.S.C. § 1536(b)(4)(C)(ii). The Conservation Framework’s 98% risk reduction goal—taking the
impact of the fishery well below the MMPA’s conservative potential biological removal level—
is intended to offset the impact of foreign fisheries and vessel strikes, not the impact of the
American Lobster Fishery. Furthermore, the Conservation Framework’s risk reduction targets
are neither reasonable nor prudent as those goals do not appear achievable without closing or
severely restricting the fishery in a manner that would be economically disastrous to the
American Lobster Fishery. In addition, reasonable and prudent measures are limited to minor
changes, and the draconian reductions required by the Conservation Framework far exceed that
limitation. For these reasons too, the targets in the Conservation Framework violate the ESA and
the APA.
102. The Conservation Framework used by NMFS and the associated risk reduction
targets NMFS is imposing upon the American Lobster Fishery in its 2021 BiOp are arbitrary,
capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law in violation of the
THIRD CLAIM: NMFS Arbitrarily, Capriciously, and Unlawfully denied MLA ESA
Section 7 Applicant Status
103. Plaintiff incorporates by reference each of the allegations set forth above in
104. Under ESA Section 7, the term “applicant” “refers to any person, as defined in
section 3(13) of the [ESA], who requires formal approval or authorization from a Federal agency
numerous rights pursuant to ESA Section 7 and federal regulations and guidance implementing
ESA Section 7.
105. MLA qualified as an applicant, pursuant to ESA Section 7, for the consultation
106. NMFS’s denial of MLA’s request for applicant status, including its refusal to
allow MLA to participate in the consultation as an applicant, violates ESA Section 7 and is
arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law, in violation
FOURTH CLAIM: NMFS Arbitrarily, Capriciously, and Unlawfully Relied on the 2021
BiOp When It Issued the TRP Rule
107. Plaintiff incorporates by reference each of the allegations set forth above in
108. When issuing the TRP Rule, NMFS relied upon the 2021 BiOp to meet its
109. Because the 2021 BiOp is arbitrary and unlawful for all of the reasons set forth in
this Complaint, NMFS’s reliance on the 2021 BiOp for its issuance of the TRP Rule violates
ESA Section 7 and is arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance
A. Declare that the Defendants, in issuing the 2021 BiOp, including the Conservation
Framework, and the TRP Rule, violated the ESA and APA by substantially overestimating the
effects of the American Lobster Fishery, including the Maine lobster fishery, on the North
Atlantic right whale and by imposing unnecessary and inappropriate conservation targets and
B. Remand, without vacatur, the 2021 BiOp, including the Conservation Framework,
and the TRP Rule, to NMFS to comply with the ESA and APA;
C. Award Plaintiff the costs of this action, including reasonable attorneys’ fees
D. Grant such other relief as this Court deems just and proper.
112430487.6 0074237-00001