Writng 1
Writng 1
Writng 1
human has also grown up, lead to the expansion of number of old individuals. And this
phenomena could have both positive and negative ways.
On the one hand, elders are building blocks of future generation. Nowadays, young children
whose parents are too busy and cannot manage to look after their kids, can be nurtured with
love by their grandparents, creating a family environment rather than kid gardens. In addition
to this, there are many old professionals with abundant experience helping youngsters
improve their knowledge and social skills. For instance, perennial teachers in some high
schools not only teach students casual lessons, but also enrich their souls through real
understandings and humanitarian lessons.
On the other hand, despite above benefits, there are some drawbacks that senior citizens can
bring. Firstly, ageing population could put the governments and whole community under
financial pressure. The more people retire, the heavier pension burden the state has to carry.
Old people also require more attention and extra care, with an investigation for nursing
homes in demand. Secondly, ageing increasing elders are contributing to exacerbate
overpopulation worldwide, which leads to overloaded facilities as housing provision and
more serious issues like environmental pollution, lack of victuals and so on.
In conclusion, looking at both sides of the situation, it is felt that although the growth in the
number of older people is a positive sign, there is not without its drawbacks. We can’t aspire
for a society wherein older people outnumber younger people because the future of a nation,
after all, is in its youth.
The diagram illustrates how the cutting instruments used during the Stone Age evolved
between 1.4 million and 0.8 million years ago.
Overall, it is clear that Tool B is sharper and more regularly shaped (đều) than the earlier
Tool A. Over a period of 0.6 million years, the cutting tool also increased in size and
effectiveness.
The front view shows that the edges of Tool A are rough (thô), revealing its earlier stage of
development. Whereas Tool A is comparatively primitive (nguyên thủy), therefore, the
smooth edges of Tool B are clearly more effective as a cutting instrument.
One of the main differences between the tools is shown in the side view diagram. While Tool
A is irregular, in contrast Tool B has a regular, flattened shape. The sharp edge of Tool B is
designed for cutting objects cleanly and easily. Finally, the back view shows most clearly that
Tool A is not only rougher, but is also smaller than Tool B
The diagram demonstrate the evolvement of cutting instruments during the Stone Age
between 1.4 million to 0.8 years ago.
In general, it can be seen from the picture that Tool B has sharper edge and more regular
shape than Tool A, indicating the improvement in size and effectiveness of cutting tool after
0.6 million year.
The front view of Tool A shows that it is rougher, in comparison to determined shape of Tool
B. While the edges of Tool B is also smoother to cut effectively, Tool A is comparatively
primitive.
The pictures illustrate the evolution of the horse over a 40 million-year period.
Overall, four stages are shown, beginning with Eohippus and ending with the development of
the modern horse.
40 million years ago, the first horse, Eohippus, was comparatively small with a short tail. Its
defining characteristic, however, was the structure of its foot, which had 4 digits. Each of the
digits was relatively small. 10 million years later, it had evolved into the larger Mesohippus,
with a longer tail and a foot structure of 3 digits.
Then, in the next stage of development, Merychippus evolved 15 million years ago. It was a
similar size to Mesohippus, and also had 3 digits on its feet, but now the digits on the feet
were larger, divided segments, and the middle digit was very prominent.
Finally, the modern horse evolved. It is bigger than its predecessors, with a large mane and its
foot structure is a single, very large digit.