International Journal of Technical Innovation In Modern Engineering &

Science (IJTIMES),(UGC APPROVED)

Impact Factor: 5.22 (SJIF-2017),e-Issn:2455-2585
“Recent Trends in Structural Engineering" (RTSE-2018)
Volume 4, Special Issue 01, Sept.-2018

REVIEW ON SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF HIGH RISE BUILDING WITH IS-

16700-2017
Dhvani M. Kantharia1, Ass. Prof. Gunvant Solanki2, Ass. Prof. Dimple Desai 3
1
P.G. Student, Department of Civil Engineering, CGPIT, Uka Tarsadia University,
2
Ass. Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, CGPIT, Uka Tarsadia University,
3
Ass. Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, CGPIT, Uka Tarsadia University,

Abstract: Tall buildings are emerging constructions in Indian cities due to urbanization. In comparison to
low and mid-rise buildings the design criteria for tall buildings are different. National building code and
other Indian standard codes are not sufficient to adequately address various issues related to tall building.
Recently, BIS released the Code IS 16700: 2017 “Criteria for Structural Safety of Tall Concrete Buildings”
under CED-38 committee. In the design of tall building other parameters that need attention are; wind load
analysis using wind tunnel test, P-Δ effect, secondary effect like creep & shrinkage, and temperature. In
analysis for seismic loads few changes in comparison to IS 1893 part 1: 2016 are also reported. Modelling
of the tall building and changes in the design considerations are listed. Criteria for selection of foundations
are specified. The importance of non-structural elements is also specified and design guidelines based on
the sensitivity of the elements are provided. In this code has given response spectra for Equivalent Static
Method and Response Spectrum method separately for 6.0 s periods. Expressions are given for calculating
design acceleration coefficient (Sa/g), for Equivalent Static Method and Response Spectrum method
separately for Rocky/hard soils, medium soils and soft soils.

Keywords: Tall concrete buildings, IS 16700: 2017, IS 1893-2016, Code provisions, Design criteria, Non-
Structural Element, Building monitoring, Response spectrum.

I. INTRODUCTION
Shortage of land in cities to accommodate the huge population migrants due to rapid urbanization can be compensated by
vertical developments of cities with tall buildings. Tall buildings are the emerging construction practise in the developing
countries like India. The design criteria for the tall buildings are different in comparison to low and medium rise
buildings. In general, wind load is not the governing criteria in most of the low rise buildings, but for tall buildings wind
is the governing criteria in most of the cases, however, based on the geographical locations and other parameters. Main
objective of the present study is to expose the reader to the latest tall building design Code IS 16700 “Criteria for
Structural Safety of Tall Concrete Buildings” which is developed by BIS CED 38 committee and released in December
2017. India is prone to strong earthquake shaking, and hence earthquake resistant design is essential. The Engineers do
not attempt to make earthquake proof buildings that will not get damaged even during the rare but strong earthquake.
Such buildings will be too robust and also too expensive. Design of buildings wherein there is no damage during the
strong but rare earthquake is called earthquake proof design. The engineers do not attempt to make earthquake proof
buildings that will not get damaged even during the rare but strong earthquake. Such buildings will be too robust and also
too expensive. The aim of the earthquake resistant design is to have structures that will behave elastically and survive
without collapse under major earthquakes that might occur during the life of the structure. To avoid collapse during a
major earthquake, structural members must be ductile enough to absorb and dissipate energy by post elastic deformation.

II. LITERATURE REVIEW

Following few researches of previous works which are based on,

Gangisetty Venkata Krishna and Ratnesh Kumar(1) was carried The selection of structural system and plan dimension
are specified based on structural configuration and seismic zone. In the design of tall building other parameters that need
attention are; wind load analysis using wind tunnel test, P-Δ effect, secondary effect like creep & shrinkage, and
temperature. During past earthquakes it was observed that performance of the NSEs are poor. In order to achieve
operational or immediate occupancy seismic performance level it is important to appropriately design non-structural
elements otherwise even minor disruption such as lack of water or power supply can compromise the functionality of the
building. In the literature it is recommended that when NSEs significantly affects structural response of the building, they
shall be considered in design and modelling of the building. Acceleration sensitive, deformation sensitive and

Organized By: C. G. Patel Institute of Technology, Uka Tarsadia University, Tarsadi, Surat. 58
 International Journal of Technical Innovation In Modern Engineering & Science
Recent Trends in Structural Engineering (RTSE-2018)
Volume 4, Special Issue 01, Sept.-2018

acceleration-and-deformation sensitive. The proposed importance factor (Ip) values for acceleration sensitive NSEs are
on higher side as compared with available literature. For „flat slab + structural wall‟ and „framed tube‟ systems,
maximum height and slenderness ratio limits for various seismic zones are not provided.

Narayan Malviya, Sumit Pahwa(2) were presented concerned with the study of seismic analysis and design of high-rise
building. The structural analysis of high rise multi-storey storey reinforced concrete symmetrical and asymmetrical frame
building is done with SAP software The Response spectrum analysis (RSA) of regular RC building frames is compare
with Response spectrum analysis of regular building and carry out the ductility based design. as per IS 1893:2002 and IS
1893:2016. In the Maximum deflection is get low value to compare old code. Shear force value and bending moment get
low value to compare old code 1893-2002.

Prakash Channappagoudar1, Vineetha Palankar, R. Shanthi Vengadeshwari, Rakesh Hiremath(3), presented one
such computation where a building in Pune is taken into consideration for analysis with respect to wind loads for
different number of floors. Analysis is done for both codes of IS 875(Part 3):1987 and IS 875(Part 3):2015 for different
parameters affecting the stability of building. This paper also includes important points of IS 16700:2017 which takes
both the previous codes of Wind and Earthquake into consideration and specifies a new code of conduct for design of tall
buildings ranging from 50 – 250 meters. Comparison of Lateral Forces for Dynamic Analysis for Wind code of 1987 and
2015 for 27floors and 39floors shows that the lateral forces in the along direction has reduced in code IS:875(Part 3)2015
when compared to earlier code ,the columns under consideration, steel requirement in IS:875(Part 3)2015 is higher
compared to IS:875(Part 3)1987. steel requirement in IS:875(Part 3)2015 is higher compared to IS:875(Part 3)1987.
Time period increases as there is increase in height of the structure for 27 floors and 39 floors. Acceleration has to be
limited to certain value such as the human is perceptible to that certain limit at that height of the building. Earlier codes
had no clear definition and limit regarding this peak acceleration whereas IS:16700 2017 code “Criteria for Tall
Buildings” limits the value of this peak acceleration to 0.15m/s2 for residential buildings. Hence here on the buildings
that are to be constructed, should have peak acceleration limited to 0.15m/s2. Base Reaction study in the code
IS:875(Part 3)1987 should be less than that of code IS:875(Part 3)2015.

Prof. Kavita K. Ghogare, Dr. Abhinandan R. Gupta, Prof. Aparna R. Nikumbh (4) done for behaviour of non-
structural elements during an earthquake. Non structural elements of a building are not a part of the main load resisting
system. Therefore, these are neglected from the structural design point of view. Many damages occurs in non structural
elements. By definition, non structural earthquake damage is damage to components that are not structural. For example,
a partition, which is non load bearing is non structural, while load bearing wall is structural. Use dynamic analysis
method as per the conditions.Mostly single-degree-offreedom SDOF System is used. Maximum damages are due to the
highest seismic force.

Khuzaim J. Sheikh, Krutarth S. Patel, Bijal Chaudhari(5) present on the response of the various structural system
used in the buildings and its comparison. Four different structural systems were investigated, which includes Structural
Wall + Moment Resisting Frame, Structural Wall System, Core Structural Wall system and Outrigger Structural System
(Belt Truss System). 39 storey building having typical height 3.65m was considered. Moreover, Response Spectrum
analysis and Static wind analysis were also performed and comparison of different structural parameters such as Base
Shear, Storey Drift, and Storey Displacement were accomplished. The Response of tall building under wind and
earthquake loading is studied as per IS codes of practice. Seismic analysis with response spectrum method and wind load
analysis are used for analysis of G+39 storey RCC building as per IS 1893(Part 1): 2016, IS 875 (Part 3): 2015, and IS
16700: 2017 codes respectively. The building with slenderness ratio of 8.55 for G+39 storey was studied, which is within
limits of slenderness give in IS 16700: 2017.The building with aspect ratio 2.46, which is less than 5 limits specified by
IS16700: 2017.Different structural systems like moment resisting frame + structural wall system, Structural wall system,
Core structural wall system and outrigger structural system are studied.

III. CONCLUSIONS

All the above review concluded that the maximum drift limit equations for deformation sensitive NSEs are not provided.
Response spectrum results show that acceleration against time is higher in case of revised code.Bending moment and
shear force obtained with old code is higher than revise code. the combined effect of lateral forces acting along and
across the wind direction is higher, hence giving a higher requirement of steel. Lesser lateral forces less will be the
displacement, increasing the stiffness of the structure. Various methods of analysis are there. IS Code provisions for non
structural elements are most important. Effects of non structural elements – on natural period of structural system,
unsymmetrical arrangement of non structural walls, position of column and many more. Outrigger system shows very
less displacement and drift in. it can be used if there is larger irregularity, which creates larger displacement and drift. It
is also been moving further higher, structural core system will also shows larger displacement and drift, where outrigger
will be seen as performing better.

Organized By: C. G. Patel Institute of Technology, Uka Tarsadia University, Tarsadi, Surat. 59
 International Journal of Technical Innovation In Modern Engineering & Science
Recent Trends in Structural Engineering (RTSE-2018)
Volume 4, Special Issue 01, Sept.-2018

IV. REFERENCES

[1] Gangisetty Venkata Krishna and Ratnesh Kumar, “ISSUES IN DESIGN OF TALL CONCRETE BUILDINGS IN
INDIA WITH REFERENCE TO IS 16700: 2017 CODE” VNIT Nagpur
[2] Narayan Malviya, Sumit Pahwa, “SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF HIGH RISE BUILDING WITH IS CODE 1893-2002
and IS CODE 1893-2016” M. Tech Scholar, CE Department, AIT, Ujjain, India
[3] Prakash Channappagoudar, Vineetha Palankar, R. Shanthi Vengadeshwari, Rakesh Hiremath, “PARAMETRIC
COMPARISON STUDY ON THE PERFORMANCE OF BUILDING UNDER LATERAL LOADS AS PER IS
875(PART3):1987 AND REVISED CODE OF IS 875(PART 3):2015” Bangalore.
[4] Prof. Kavita K. Ghogare, Dr. Abhinandan R. Gupta, Prof. Aparna R. Nikumbh, “Behaviour of Non-Structural
Elements During An Earthquake” Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering and Technology, Akola.
[5] Khuzaim J. Sheikh, Krutarth S. Patel, Bijal Chaudhari, “A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LATERAL LOAD
RESISTING SYSTEMS IN TALL STRUCTURES” Civil Engineering Department, Chhotubhai Gopalbhai Patel
Institute of Technology.

Organized By: C. G. Patel Institute of Technology, Uka Tarsadia University, Tarsadi, Surat. 60