Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 70 views

    Group Name: - Year/Section: - Date: - Evaluator: - Title of Research: - Grade

    Uploaded by

    Tin Aguilera
    This document provides a rubric for evaluating research manuscripts at Emilio Aguinaldo College-Cavite. The rubric assesses manuscripts across several categories, including the introduction, literature review, methodology, analysis of data, and summary of findings. For each category, the rubric provides between 5-7 qualitative indicators to evaluate elements like the significance of the topic, use of sources, research question/purpose, framework, and summary. Scores range from 1-5, with higher scores signifying exemplary evidence that the indicator has been thoroughly met. The rubric aims to provide a standardized means of evaluating the content, structure, and format of student research manuscripts.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Group Name: - Year/Section: - Date: - Evaluator: - Title of Research: - Grade

    Uploaded by

    Tin Aguilera
    70 views3 pages
    This document provides a rubric for evaluating research manuscripts at Emilio Aguinaldo College-Cavite. The rubric assesses manuscripts across several categories, including the introduction, literature review, methodology, analysis of data, and summary of findings. For each category, the rubric provides between 5-7 qualitative indicators to evaluate elements like the significance of the topic, use of sources, research question/purpose, framework, and summary. Scores range from 1-5, with higher scores signifying exemplary evidence that the indicator has been thoroughly met. The rubric aims to provide a standardized means of evaluating the content, structure, and format of student research manuscripts.

    Original Description:

    Research-manuscript-rubric

    Original Title

    Research-manuscript-rubric

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document provides a rubric for evaluating research manuscripts at Emilio Aguinaldo College-Cavite. The rubric assesses manuscripts across several categories, including the introduction, literature review, methodology, analysis of data, and summary of findings. For each category, the rubric provides between 5-7 qualitative indicators to evaluate elements like the significance of the topic, use of sources, research question/purpose, framework, and summary. Scores range from 1-5, with higher scores signifying exemplary evidence that the indicator has been thoroughly met. The rubric aims to provide a standardized means of evaluating the content, structure, and format of student research manuscripts.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    70 views3 pages

    Group Name: - Year/Section: - Date: - Evaluator: - Title of Research: - Grade

    Uploaded by

    Tin Aguilera
    This document provides a rubric for evaluating research manuscripts at Emilio Aguinaldo College-Cavite. The rubric assesses manuscripts across several categories, including the introduction, literature review, methodology, analysis of data, and summary of findings. For each category, the rubric provides between 5-7 qualitative indicators to evaluate elements like the significance of the topic, use of sources, research question/purpose, framework, and summary. Scores range from 1-5, with higher scores signifying exemplary evidence that the indicator has been thoroughly met. The rubric aims to provide a standardized means of evaluating the content, structure, and format of student research manuscripts.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 3

    EMILIO AGUINALDO COLLEGE-CAVITE

    RESEARCH DEPARTMENT

    RESEARCH MANUSCRIPT RUBRIC

    S.Y. 2018-2019

    Group Name: ______________________Year/Section: ___________________Date: ________


    Evaluator: _________________________Title of Research: _____________________________
    Grade: _____________
    Scoring Guide:

    1= no evidence of indicator being met.

    2= some evidence of indicator being met, but needs improvement

    3= acceptable evidence of indicator being met for course purposes.

    4= consistent evidence of indicator being met.

    5= exemplary evidence of indicator being met, meritorious researcher skills. the content, structure, and format
    of the product.

    QUALIFIERS: 1 2 3 4 5
    1. Significance of the topic
    2. Uses sufficient and
    appropriate primary
    resources to develop
    background or context for
    research question
    3. Culminates with a clearly
    INTRODUCTION OF THE STUDY stated purpose/ research
    question

    4. Research gap is clearly stated


    with supporting statements
    5. Scope and delimitations are
    clear and logical.
    6. Chapter summary is complete
    and is detailed.

    1. Literature review includes at


    least 10 resources from books
    and 4 from other sources, e.g.
    Scholarly articles.
    2. Uses sufficient and
    REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE appropriate primary
    resources to describe/explain
    theoretical assumptions that
    contextualize the research
    question.
    3. Includes current literature
    highly relevant to the topic.
    4. Establishes an advanced
    theoretical framework.
    5. Establishes an advanced
    conceptual framework.
    6. Chapter summary is complete
    and is detailed.

    1. Clearly describes the


    selection methods,
    parameters, subjects and
    setting, or context of the
    METHODOLOGY study based on accepted
    research practice.
    2. Clearly describes data
    gathering methodology based
    on accepted research
    practice.
    3. Clearly describes data analysis
    methodologies based on
    accepted research practice
    4. Is appropriate for publication
    or presentation with little or
    no revision.
    5. Chapter summary is complete
    and is detailed.

    1. Accurately stated based on


    the data.
    2. Shows critical analysis of
    ANALYSIS OF DATA research related to topic and
    compared to current study.
    3. Statistical data is well
    presented through tables
    and graphs.(QN )
    4. Statistical treatment is
    effective and valid. (QN)
    5. The instrument used is
    valid.
    6. The instrument used is
    reliable
    7. Chapter summary is complete
    and detailed.

    1. Thoughtful, detailed and


    comprehensive discussion is
    presented .
    2. Key findings are specifically
    related to previous research.
    Implications are well
    presented
    3. Shows creative thinking and
    thoughtful insight
    SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, 4. Project is well organized,
    CONCLUSIONS AND needing only very little
    RECOMMENDATIONS clarification, if any
    5. The entire project is
    presented in format
    appropriate for intended
    scholarly venue.
    6. Presentation of the material
    is highly appropriate and
    professional
    7. Paper is free of major
    spelling, grammatical and
    punctuation errors
    8. All citations and references
    are presented in proper
    format and do not need
    revision.

    You might also like