DOI:

10.21776/ub.jpacr.2019.008.002.458 J. Pure App. Chem. Res., 2019, 8 (2), 140-146

X
12 June 2019

Synthesis of Eugenyl Cinnamate from Clove Oil (Syzygium

aromaticum) via Bromination-Dehydrobromination Methods
Anita Alni,1* Shinta Ellisya Fauzia ,1 Didin Mujahidin1

1
Division of Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Institut Teknologi Bandung,
Jalan Ganesa 10 Bandung, Jawa Barat, Indonesia 40132
*
Corresponding e-mail: [email protected]

Received 31 January 2019; Accepted 12 June 2019

ABSTRACT
Synthesis of bioactive materials based on Indonesian natural products as precursors are
potential to achieve a sustainable supply of modern medicines. Eugenyl cinnamate is a
crucial building block in many bioactive compounds such as hepatoprotective silibinin. This
research features simple synthesis of eugenyl cinnamate from eugenol, an essential oil
presents as major constituent of clove oil (Syzygium aromaticum). The transformations were
carried out via protection of hydroxyl group, bromination, and dehydrobromination reactions
of eugenol (1) consecutively. The products of the synthesis were purified by gravity column
chromatography and were characterized by FTIR and NMR spectroscopy. Benzylation of
eugenol was carried out under basic condition with high yield (94.3%). Characterization by
spectroscopic methods showed that eugenyl benzyl ether (2) was formed. Bromination of
eugenyl benzyl ether yielded three products, namely: dibromo (3a and 3b), and tri-bromo
eugenyl benzyl ether (3c). Compound 3a and 3b were epimers based on intensive NMR
analysis (1H, 13C and DEPT). These epimers were separable using simple gravitational
colomn chromatography. To improve the selectivity of the reaction, protecting group was
changed to acetyl to yield eugenyl acetyl ether (4). Bromination of (4) yielded the desired
dibromo product (5). The dehydrobromination reaction of compound 5 with cinnamic acid
yielded the eugenyl cinnamate (6) with yield of 23.2%.

Key word: Eugenol, bromination, eugenyl cinnamate, photocatalysis, epimers

INTRODUCTION
Synthesis of bioactive materials based on Indonesian natural products as precursors are
potential to be developed to achieve a sustainable supply of modern medicines. Synthesis of
bioactive molecules often requires varieties of building blocks and catalyst originated from
petroleum refining and cracking processes [1]. The absence of petroleum refining and fine
chemicals industry in Indonesia requires these precursors to be highly dependent on import,
and lengthy processing time is required until the chemicals arrive at laboratories. On the other
hand, Indonesian biodiversity could provide abundant sources of building blocks intact with
desired functional groups for the target molecules [2]. Bio-based fine chemicals could offer
larger variety of building blocks range from simple to complicated chiral structures as
compared to petroleum-based compounds [3].
Eugenol is major constituent of clove oil distilled from Syzygium aromaticum, a tree
plant originated from Maluku Island Indonesia. These region has produced cloved oil for
decades and exported as raw material. Distilled oil from the flowers of clove could contain up
to 88% of eugenol which could be further purified through fractional distillation [4].
The journal homepage www.jpacr.ub.ac.id
p-ISSN : 2302 – 4690 | e-ISSN : 2541 – 0733

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International which
permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
 J. Pure App. Chem. Res., 2019, 8 (2), 140-146 X
12 June 2019

Phenylpropene group in eugenol open feasibility to access numerous amounts of bioactive

compounds. The use of eugenol as building block is not entirely new, various targets have been
accomplished using eugenol as starting material [5]. In this research, eugenyl cinnamate was
synthesized from eugenol which could be further used as building block to synthesize
hepatoprotective silibinin [6]. Eugenyl cinnamate was also reported to have anti-schistosomal
activity by inducing cytoplasmic vacuoles and death in schistosomula of worm Schistosoma
mansoni [7]. Previous route to synthesize eugenyl cinnamate has also been reported by
Holzgrabe et al. via transformation of isolated bornyl caffeate [7].

EXPERIMENT
Compounds which are sensitive to moisture were handled accordingly and stored in
ambience brown bottles. Procedures that involve moisture sensitive compounds were carried
out under a positive pressure of nitrogen and in glassware that were flame-dried equipped with
sealed rubber septum. Teflon-coated magnetic stirring bars were used to stir the reaction
mixtures unless otherwise stated. All experiments were monitored by analytical thin layer
chromatography. Solvents were removed using rotary evaporator under ~50 mmHg of pressure
and heated in a water bath at 40 oC or above.

Chemicals and instrumentation

Eugenol was obtained from PT. Indesso Utama Kencana and used without further
purification. Benzyl chloride, Potassium carbonate, sodium sulphate, bromine, sodium
thiosulphate and cinnamic acid were obtained from Sigma and used without further
purification. Solvents such as dimethyl sulfoxide, acetonitrile, ethyl acetate, n-hexane,
chloroform and acetone were from Merck. Analytical thin layer chromatography was
performed using Merck 60 F254 pre-coated silica gel plates (0.25 mm thickness). Visualization
was conducted using UV light (254 nm). Flash column chromatography was performed using
Merck Silica Gel 60 (70-230 mesh) and freshly distilled solvents.
Proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR) and carbon nuclear magnetic resonance
(13C NMR) spectroscopy were measured on Agilent DD2 and JEOL ECA 500 MHz NMR
spectrometer. Chemical shifts were reported as δ with the reference to tetramethysilane (δ 0.00)
in units of parts per million (ppm). Deuterated solvent used in the measurement was
chloroform-d (CDCl3) which provided residual solvent signal as an internal standard (1H
NMR, δ 7.26, singlet; 13C NMR, δ 77.04, triplet). Multiplicities were stated as: s (singlet), d
(doublet), m (multiplets), br (broad), dd (doublet of doublets), and ddt (doublet of doublet of
triplets) accordingly. Coupling constants (J) were indicated in Hertz (Hz). The number of
protons (n) in the spectrum for a given resonance was denoted by nH. NMR spectrums are
provided as supplementary document.

Procedures
4-Allyl-1-(benzyloxy)-2-methoxybenzene (2)
Eugenol (3.29 g, 20 mmol, 1 equiv.) and 50 mL of acetonitrile were added into a three-
neck round bottom flask with attached condenser and rubber septum. 6.92 g (50 mmol, 2.5
equiv.) of K2CO3 was added and the reaction mixture was stirred for 10 minutes at room
temperature. Benzyl chloride (4.6 mL, 40 mmol, 2 equiv.) was added dropwise and the reaction
mixture was refluxed for 24 h. Upon completion, 50 mL of water was added, and the reaction
mixture was extracted by ethyl acetate (3 x 50 mL). To the combined organic layer was added
Na2SO4 and the mixture was filtered, and the filtrate was evaporated. The crude product was
141
The journal homepage www.jpacr.ub.ac.id
p-ISSN : 2302 – 4690 | e-ISSN : 2541 – 0733

 J. Pure App. Chem. Res., 2019, 8 (2), 140-146 X
12 June 2019

purified using column chromatography with ethyl acetate: n-hexane (5:95) as eluent (94.27%
yield, Rf 0.41, pale yellow oil).
13
C NMR (125 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 149.6, 146.5, 137.6, 137.4, 133.3, 128.5, 127.8,
127.3, 120.4, 115.7, 114.2, 112.4, 71.2, 56.0, 39.9. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 7.46
(dd, J = 8.3, 1.2 Hz, 2H), 7.37 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.31 (tt, J = 7.3, 2.2 Hz, 1H), 6.83 (d, J = 8.1
Hz, 1H), 6.76 (d, J = 1.9 Hz, 1H), 6.68 (dd, J = 8.1, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 5.97 (m, 1H), 5.15 (s, 2H),
5.12-5.06 (m, 2H), 3.89 (s, 3H), 3.34 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 2H).

4-Allyl-1-(acetyloxy)-2-methoxybenzene (4)
A 5.0 mL of acetyl chloride (2 equiv.) was added into a three-neck round bottom flask
and was heated to reflux. 5.4 g of Eugenol (1 equiv.) was added dropwise. The reaction was
monitored using thin layer chromatography for 1 hour. After completion, 10 mL saturated
sodium bicarbonate solution was added. The organic layer was extracted using ethyl acetate
and concentrated in vacuo. Eugenyl acetate 4 was subjected to subsequent reaction without
further purification.

1-(Benzyloxy)-4-(2,3-dibromopropyl)-2-methoxybenzene (3a-c)
Eugenyl benzyl ether (447 mg, 1.92 mmol, 1 equiv.) was added into round bottom flask
filled with 4 mL chloroform. The mixture was stirred at 0 oC (in an ice bath). After that, 0.15
mL (1.5 equiv.) of Br2 in chloroform was added dropwise until the color of solution remain
brownish yellow. The mixture was continued to stir for 1 hour followed by addition of 10 mL
of saturated sodium thiosulphate solution. The mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate (3x 10
mL). To the combined organic layer was added Na2SO4, and then was filtered. The filtrate was
concentrated in vacuo. The crude product was purified by column chromatography with n-
hexane: ethyl acetate: chloroform (93.5:1.5:5) as eluent. Three products were obtained and
characterized as follow:
3a, A pale yellow oil, Rf 0.31, 13C NMR (125 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 148.8, 148.1, 136.3,
129.2, 128.7, 128.1, 127.4, 117.9, 114.9, 114.2, 71.2, 56.2, 51.2, 42.9, 37.2. 1H NMR (500
MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 7.45 (dd, J = 10, 5 Hz, 2H), 7.40 (t, J = 10 Hz, 2H), 7.34 (tt, J = 5, 10
Hz, 1H), 7.08 (s, 1H), 6.88 (s, 1H), 5.11 (s, 2H), 4.5 (m, 1H), 3.89 (s, 3H), 3.86 (dd, J = 10, 5
Hz, 1H), 3.75 (dd, J = 10, 5 Hz, 1H), 3.62 (dd, J = 15, 5 Hz, 1H), 3.07 (dd, J = 15, 10 Hz, 1H).
3b, A pale yellow oil, Rf 0.38, 13C NMR (125 MHz Chloroform-d) δ 149.4, 147.4, 137.1,
129.7, 128.6, 127.8, 127.3, 121.7, 113.8, 113.2, 71.0, 56.0, 52.6, 41.5, 36.1. 1H NMR (500
MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 7.46 (dd, J = 10, 5 Hz, 2H), 7.38 (t, J = 5 Hz, 2H), 7.32 (tt, J = 10, 5
Hz, 1H), 6.86 (d, J = 10, 1H), 6.86 (d, J = 5, 1H), 6.78 (dd, J = 10, 5 Hz, 1H), 5.11 (s, 2H),
4.35 (m, 1H), 3.91 (s, 3H), 3.82 (dd, J = 10, 5 Hz, 1H), 3.62 (dd, J = 10, 9 Hz, 1H), 3.40 (dd, J
= 15, 5 Hz, 1H), 3.12 (dd, J = 15, 9 Hz, 1H).
3c, A pale yellow oil, Rf 0.47, 13C NMR (125 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 149.6, 147.9, 137.0,
132.5, 128.6, 127.9, 127.3, 119.5, 113.8, 111.4, 70.9, 56.1, 48.5, 35.7. 1H NMR (500 MHz,
Chloroform-d) δ 7.45 (d, J = 10 Hz, 2H), 7.38 (t, J = 10 Hz, 2H), 7.32 (t, J = 10Hz, 1H), 6.88
(d, J = 10 Hz, 1H), 6.78 (d, J = 5, 1H), 6.72 (dd, J = 10, 5 Hz, 1H), 5.16 (s, 2H), 3.91 (s, 3H),
3.77 (dd, J = 10, 5 Hz, 2H), 3.71 (dd, J = 10, 5 Hz, 2H), 3.31 (qi, J = 10 Hz, 1H).

(E)-3-(4-Acetoxy-3-methoxyphenyl)allyl cinnamate (6)

Dibromo eugenyl acetate (78.4 mg, 0.21 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) was added into a round
bottom flask followed by the addition of 2.0 mL of DMSO, 35.2 mg of cinnamic acid (0.23
mmol, 1.1 equiv.) and 59.9 mg K2CO3 (0.4 mmol, 2.0 equiv.). The reaction mixture was stirred
142
The journal homepage www.jpacr.ub.ac.id
p-ISSN : 2302 – 4690 | e-ISSN : 2541 – 0733

 J. Pure App. Chem. Res., 2019, 8 (2), 140-146 X
12 June 2019

at room temperature for 24 hours. The crude product was purified by column chromatography
using n-hexane: ethyl acetate (9:1) as eluent. The product 6 (17.5 mg, pale yellow oil 23.19%,
Rf 0.41) was characterized by spectroscopic methods.
13
C NMR (125 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 169.1, 166.7, 151.1, 145.2, 139.6, 135.3, 134.3,
133.6, 130.4, 128.9, 128.1, 123.6, 122.9, 119.4, 117.8, 110.2, 65.0, 55.9, 20.7. 1H NMR (500
MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 7.75 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 7.58 – 7.52 (m, 2H), 7.43 – 7.37 (m, 3H),
7.04 – 6.98 (m, 3H), 6.69 (d, J = 15.9 Hz, 1H), 6.50 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 6.33 (m, 1H), 4.88
(dd, J = 6.4, 1.2 Hz, 2H), 3.86 (s, 3H), 2.33 (s, 3H).

RESULT AND DISCUSSION

Synthesis of eugenyl cinnamate included the transformation of an allyl group in eugenol
[7]. However, other than an active allyl group, eugenol also contained an active phenol group
that can affect the electrophilic substitution of the bromide into the aromatic ring. Hence,
protection of the phenol group was required before the bromination reaction to prevent the
formation of aryl bromide [8]. Schematic representation of the multistep synthesis is shown in
Figure 1.

Figure 1. Synthesis of eugenyl cinnamate from eugenol. Conditions: (i) BnCl (2 equiv.),
K2CO3 (2.5 equiv), CH3CN, reflux 24 hours; (ii) Br2 (1.5 equiv), CHCl3, 0o C, 1 hour; (iii)
AcCl (2 equiv.); (iv) Br2 (1 equiv.), AcOH; (v) Cinnamic acid (1.1 equiv), K2CO3 (2 equiv.),
DMSO, rt, 24 hour.

Benzylation was carried out by reacting eugenol with benzyl chloride with K2CO3 as base
in acetonitrile [9]. Potassium carbonate deprotonated the acidic hydrogen of phenolic group of
eugenol. The phenolate anion was stabilized by the resonance of the aromatic system. The
product of this reaction, eugenyl benzyl ether (2) was obtained in high yield (94.27%).
The 13C NMR spectrum showed 15 signals where two signals at chemical shift of 127.3
and 128.5 ppm had double intensity which corresponded to two carbons each. This support the
structure of product 2 that consist of 17 carbon atoms. Signal at the chemical shifts of 55.6 and
71.2 ppm corresponded to carbon in methyl and metylene ether respectively. Methylene ether
143
The journal homepage www.jpacr.ub.ac.id
p-ISSN : 2302 – 4690 | e-ISSN : 2541 – 0733

 J. Pure App. Chem. Res., 2019, 8 (2), 140-146 X
12 June 2019

appeared downfield as compared to the methyl ether due to the bond with aromatic ring and
caused deshielding effect. Benzylic carbon appears at δ 127.3, 127.8, and 128.5 ppm. These
signals showed symmetry in which two carbons that were at ortho position to methylene were
equivalent, so as two carbons at meta position.
The 1H NMR spectrum showed that there were 18 hydrogen atoms based on the
integration of the signals. Signal at δ 5.15 ppm (s, 2H) corresponded to methylene bonded to
aromatic group. Signal at δ 6.60-7.60 ppm corresponded to aromatic proton which consisted of
two aromatic rings. Signals at chemical shift of 6.83, 6.76, and 6.68 ppm were aromatics proton
from eugenol which appear upfield as compared to signals of benzyl protecting group which
appear at chemical shift of 7.46, 7.37, and 7.31 ppm. This data confirmed the structure of
compound 2.
Bromination towards compound 2 was carried out by dropwise addition of Br2 solution
in chloroform. Upon addition, the mixture changed color into brown, which quickly
disappeared that indicated that addition to double bond has occurred. The addition of Br2
solution was stopped when permanent yellowish brown color was observed. At the end of the
reaction, saturated sodium sulphate solution was added to reduce the unreacted Br2 in solution.
Bromination towards compound 2 produced three compounds which were separated using
column chromatography namely product 3a, 3b and 3c with the yield of 18.56%, 15.47%, and
14.30% respectively. The remaining starting material was also recovered.
The 13C NMR spectrum of 3c showed 15 carbons. Two signals at δ 127.4 and 128.7 ppm
corresponded to two carbons each which suggested there were 17 carbon atoms. Signals at
chemical shift of 35-60 ppm which indicated carbon bonded to halogen (-C-Br) in place of
terminal alkene signals. This suggested that alkene group in benzyl ether 2 has undergone
addition reaction to form a dibromo compound. The 1H NMR spectrum of 3c indicated 17
hydrogen atoms. Two signals appeared as singlet at δ 7.08 (s, 1H) and 6.88 ppm (s, 1H). These
signals corresponded to aromatic proton hence indicated bromination has occurred at the
aromatic region. Singlet multiplicity suggested that proton at δ 7.08 ppm does not have
neighbor at ortho or meta position, hence electrophilic substitution had occurred at the position
meta to the benzyloxy or ortho towards the allyl group. The methoxy substituents on benzyl
ether 2 were electron donor that activated the aromatic ring (ortho-para directing). The allyl
group was deactivating; hence substitution was directed towards meta position. In addition,
steric hindrance of the methoxy group directed the substitution reaction to occur at para
position to the methoxy group.
The 13C NMR spectrum of 3a showed 15 signals. Two signals at δ 127.3 and 128.6 ppm
corresponded to two carbons each, hence suggested that compound 3a consist of 17 carbon
atoms. Terminal alkene signals were absent, replaced by signals at δ 35-60 ppm which
corresponded to C-Br, and confirmed that addition had occurred. The 1H NMR spectrum of 3a
showed signals corresponded to 18 hydrogens. Signals at aromatics region were observed at δ
6.86, 6.86, and 6.78 ppm which suggested there was no substitution at the aromatic ring. As
compared to spectrum of its precursor 2, the disappearance of terminal alkene signals at δ 5.97
ppm (m, 1H) and 5.12-5.06 ppm (m, 2H) replaced by methyne and methylene signals at δ 4.35
and 3.9-3.00 ppm supported the 13C NMR that bromination has occurred to produce compound
3a.
The 13C NMR spectrum of compound 3b showed 14 signals in which two of them
corresponded to two signals each. This suggested that compound 3b consisted of 16 carbon
atoms. As compared to its precursor (compound 2) the terminal alkene signals were absent,
replaced by signals at δ 35-60 ppm which corresponded to C-Br which suggested that
144
The journal homepage www.jpacr.ub.ac.id
p-ISSN : 2302 – 4690 | e-ISSN : 2541 – 0733

 J. Pure App. Chem. Res., 2019, 8 (2), 140-146 X
12 June 2019

bromination had occurred to form a dibromo product. Signals at the aromatics region suggested
that there was no aromatic substitution. The DEPT NMR experiment showed that signal at δ
35.8 ppm had twice as much intensity corresponded to two methylene groups. This suggested
there were 17 carbon atoms in compound 3b instead of 16 as suggested by 13C NMR spectrum.
Further analysis of the 13C NMR and 1H NMR spectra suggested that compound 3a and
3b had similar structure; however, these compounds were separated by column
chromatography and showed different chemical shifts for the propyl group in the NMR
spectrum. Conformation analysis of compounds 3a suggested that the methyne group was
between Br and H hence appear at downfield position as compared to compound 3b (Figure
2). Based on this data, compound 3a and 3b are epimers. The formation of epimers from
bromination had been reported previously [10].

Figure 2. Newman projection of compound 3a and 3b

Due to the formations of side products and low conversion of starting materials,
alternative protecting group was used. Eugenol was protected with acetyl group based on
reported procedure to yield acetyl ether 4 [9]. Compound 4 was subjected to bromination
without further purification to yield compound 5 with 64 % yield. Finally, compound 5 was
subjected to reaction with cinnamic acid to form the target product (eugenyl cinnamate 6).
K2CO3 was used as base to deprotonate the acid and further react with the dibromo compound
to produce compound 6 with 23.19% yield. The reaction was carried out in DMSO to better
solvate the cinnamate anion and react with the dibromo compound 5.
The 13C NMR spectrum of compound 6 showed 19 signals, in which signals at δ 128.1
and 128.9 ppm corresponded to two carbons each, suggesting there were 21 carbons in
compound 6. Signals at δ 166.7 and 169.1 ppm corresponded to two carbonyl esters. Signals at
δ 117.8, 122.9, 133.6, and 145.2 ppm suggested two alkene groups were present. The 1H NMR
spectrum showed 20 hydrogen atoms. Signals at δ 7.75, 6.69, 6.50 and 6.33 ppm indicated
proton bonded to alkene group. Structure of compound 6 was confirmed based on 1H NMR
and 13C NMR analysis.
Eugenyl cinnamate 6 could be utilized as building block in many bioactive compounds,
hence the route to synthesize it from abundantly available natural products could provide
cheaper access to medicine.

CONCLUSION
Synthesis of eugenyl cinnamate 6 was accomplished via bromination-
dehydrobromination methods. The syntheses were carried out in three steps with good yield
(23.2 %). Bromination towards benzyl eugenyl ether 2 produced three products including
brominated aromatic ring 3c, and two epimeric dibromo compounds 3a and 3b that were
separable using gravitational column chromatographic method. Bromination towards acetyl
eugenyl ether 4 yielded single product (compound 5) hence this route was pursued.

145
The journal homepage www.jpacr.ub.ac.id
p-ISSN : 2302 – 4690 | e-ISSN : 2541 – 0733

 J. Pure App. Chem. Res., 2019, 8 (2), 140-146 X
12 June 2019

Dehydrobromination was carried out in the presence of base using cinnamic acid as substituent
and yielded the desired eugenyl cinnamate ester 6.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work was funded by a grant from the Directorate General of Higher Education,
Indonesia (DIKTI) PDUPT 2019 (Contract number: 1169m/I1.C01/PL/2019. The laboratory
instruments were purchased with the aid of ITB research program P3MI 2018.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Authors declare no conflict of interests.

REFERENCES
[1]. Blaser, H.-U., Malan, C., Pugin, B., Spindler, F., Steiner, H., Studer, M. Adv. Synth.
Catal. 2003, 345(1-2), 103-151.
[2]. Hakim, E. H., Achmad, S. A., Juliawaty, L. D., Makmur, L., Syah, Y. M., Aimi, N.,
Kitajima, M., Takayama, H., Ghisalberti, E. L. J. Nat. Med. 2006, 60(3), 161-184.
[3]. Torres, A. I., Tsapatsis, M., Daoutidis, P. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2012, 42, 130-137.
[4]. Cortés-Rojas, D. F., de Souza, C. R. F., Oliveira, W. P. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2014,
4(2), 90-96.
[5]. Kaufman, T. S. J. Braz. Chem. Soc., 2015, 26(6), 1055-1085.
[6]. Schümann, J., Prockl, J., Kiemer, A. K., Vollmar, A. M., Bang, R., Tiegs, G. J. Hepatol.
2003, 39(3), 333-340.
[7]. Glaser, J., Schurigt, U., Suzuki, B. M., Caffrey, C. R., Holzgrabe, U. Molecules 2015,
20(6), 10873-10883.
[8]. Briot, A., Baehr, C., Brouillard, R., Wagner, A., Mioskowski, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003,
44(5), 965-967.
[9]. Fuhrmann, E., Talbiersky, J. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2005, 9(2), 206-211.
[10]. Lim, C., Baek, D. J., Kim, D., Youn, S. W., Kim, S. Org. Lett. 2009, 11(12), 2583-2586.

146
The journal homepage www.jpacr.ub.ac.id
p-ISSN : 2302 – 4690 | e-ISSN : 2541 – 0733