Notes
Notes
Notes
INTRODUCTION
Situation 1: Person X dies leaving behind self-acquired property. X is a Hindu and belongs
to the Mitakshara school. He leaves behind his mother, father, wife and son.
Solution: Irrespective of age, X’s son, wife and mother will get an equal share in X’s self-
acquired property. However, X’s father does not get the preferential right. The Hindu
Succession Act gives preference to females – although the mother and father share the same
degree of relationship with X, only the mother gets the preferential right.
Situation 2: X leaves behind ancestral property. X has a wife, three sons and a daughter.
Solution: X, in this situation, is merely a holder of the property. In such cases, various factors
must be taken into account in order to decide property devolution (Mitakshara/Dayabhaaga,
number of coparceners).
Due to lack of legal knowledge, families often enter into mutual agreements to divide
property. Then, a party who may be legally entitled to such property may approach the Court
in order to receive their share. This is called Reopening of Distribution of Property.
HINDU MINORITY AND GUARDIANSHIP ACT
- The mechanism of providing guardianship is one of the main purposes of the Act. In
addition, it not only clarifies some aspects of the Hindu Succession Act, but also issues
pertaining to the traditional legal schools.
- Guardianship can be divided as:
1. Guardianship for the purpose of child [education, marriage, etc.] – Personal Affairs
2. Guardianship for the purpose of property [when gift is given to a minor, for instance]
– Affairs relating to property
- Even the natural father does not have absolute right over the property of his minor child at
all times. In a Joint Hindu Family, for instance, the Karta acts as a competent person for
managing the property of a minor. The Karta may not be the natural father of the person.
- In this sense, a minor child may have dual guardianship (different guardians for different
properties).