Cambridge Assessment International Education: First Language English Igcse 9-1 0990/22 May/June 2019
Cambridge Assessment International Education: First Language English Igcse 9-1 0990/22 May/June 2019
Cambridge Assessment International Education: First Language English Igcse 9-1 0990/22 May/June 2019
Published
This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of the
examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not indicate the
details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began, which would have
considered the acceptability of alternative answers.
Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner Report for
Teachers.
Cambridge International will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes.
Cambridge International is publishing the mark schemes for the May/June 2019 series for most
Cambridge IGCSE™, Cambridge International A and AS Level and Cambridge Pre-U components, and
some Cambridge O Level components.
These general marking principles must be applied by all examiners when marking candidate answers.
They should be applied alongside the specific content of the mark scheme or generic level descriptors
for a question. Each question paper and mark scheme will also comply with these marking principles.
• the specific content of the mark scheme or the generic level descriptors for the question
• the specific skills defined in the mark scheme or in the generic level descriptors for the question
• the standard of response required by a candidate as exemplified by the standardisation scripts.
Marks awarded are always whole marks (not half marks, or other fractions).
• marks are awarded for correct/valid answers, as defined in the mark scheme. However, credit
is given for valid answers which go beyond the scope of the syllabus and mark scheme,
referring to your Team Leader as appropriate
• marks are awarded when candidates clearly demonstrate what they know and can do
• marks are not deducted for errors
• marks are not deducted for omissions
• answers should only be judged on the quality of spelling, punctuation and grammar when these
features are specifically assessed by the question as indicated by the mark scheme. The
meaning, however, should be unambiguous.
Rules must be applied consistently e.g. in situations where candidates have not followed
instructions or in the application of generic level descriptors.
Marks should be awarded using the full range of marks defined in the mark scheme for the question
(however; the use of the full mark range may be limited according to the quality of the candidate
responses seen).
Marks awarded are based solely on the requirements as defined in the mark scheme. Marks should
not be awarded with grade thresholds or grade descriptors in mind.
Imagine you are the zookeeper. Later that day you write in your
journal reflecting on your feelings about life now and how things
have changed.
Base your journal on what you have read in Passage A, but be careful
to use your own words. Address each of the three bullet points.
Use the Marking Criteria for Question 1 (Table A, Reading and Table B
Writing)
1 Notes on task
Candidates should identify key ideas from the passage (see below) and
develop them relevantly, supporting what they write with details from the
passage and judging the appropriate register for the genre, which is a talk to
a group of new trainee guides. Look for a clear and balanced response
which covers the three areas of the question, is well sequenced, and is in
the candidate’s own words.
Annotate A1 for references to what the zookeeper does each day, why he
does it and how that makes him feel.
Annotate A2 for references to what the zookeeper has noticed about the
boy and his father and his feelings about each of them.
Annotate A3 for references to how things have changed for the zookeeper
and the world around him since he first started working at the zoo and
suggest what he thinks the future may hold for him.
A1: What the zookeeper does each day, why he does it, and how that
makes him feel.
1 A2: What the zookeeper has noticed about the boy and his father and
his feelings about each of them.
A3: How things have changed for the zookeeper and the world around
him since he first started working at the zoo and suggest what he
thinks the future may hold for him.
Band 3 4–6 • There is some evidence of general understanding of the main ideas,
although the response may be thin or in places lack focus on the
passage or the question.
• Some brief, straightforward reference to the passage is made.
• There may be some reliance on lifting from the text.
• One of the bullets may not be addressed.
• The voice might be inappropriate.
Band 2 1–3 • The response is either very general, with little reference to the passage,
or a reproduction of sections of the original.
• Content is either insubstantial or unselective.
• There is little realisation of the need to modify material from the
passage.
Notes on task
The notes are a guide to what good responses might say about the
selections, along with possible overviews which may be offered for each
paragraph. Alternative acceptable explanations should be credited.
Candidates can make any sensible comment, but only credit those that are
relevant to the correct meanings of the words in the context.
Mark holistically for the overall quality of the response, not for the number of
words chosen for discussion, bearing in mind that there should be a range of
choices to demonstrate an understanding of how language works for the
higher bands, and that this should include the ability to explain images.
The general effect is of the physical signs of extreme aging and the biological
maturity/deterioration of the zookeeper – a curiosity for the boy as if
observing another species.
Band 6 9–10 • Wide ranging discussion of judiciously selected language with some
high quality comments that add meaning and associations to
words/phrases in both parts of the question, and demonstrate the
writer's reasons for using them.
• Tackles imagery with some precision and imagination.
• There is clear evidence that the candidate understands how language
works.
Band 5 7–8 • Explanations are given of carefully selected words and phrases.
• Explanations of meanings within the context of the passage are secure
and effects are identified in both parts of the question.
• Images are recognised as such and the response goes some way to
explaining them.
• There is some evidence that the candidate understands how language
works.
Band 4 5–6 • A satisfactory attempt is made to select appropriate words and phrases.
• The response mostly gives meanings of words and any attempt to
suggest and explain effects is basic or very general.
• One half of the question may be better answered than the other.
Band 3 3–4 • The response provides a mixture of appropriate choices and words that
communicate less well.
• The response may correctly identify linguistic devices but not explain
why they are used.
• Explanations may be few, general, slight or only partially effective.
• They may repeat the language of the original or do not refer to specific
words.
Use the Marking Criteria for Question 3 (Table A, Reading and Table B
Writing)
Notes on task
Candidates should select relevant ideas from the passage (see below) to
include in a prose response to the summary task. Look for evidence that
ideas relevant to the focus of the task have been understood and
communicated clearly and concisely in the candidate’s own words.
3 What were the challenges for Benjamin Mee in buying, saving and 20
running the zoo, according to Passage B?
You must use continuous writing (not note form) and use your own
words as far as possible.
Notes
• Overview demonstrates a candidate’s ability to summarise carefully selected key points in relation
to the focus of the question rather than to paraphrase the passage. Candidates should give a
focused response, drawing ideas from the passage provided; they should demonstrate clear
understanding of both explicit and implicit meanings.
Table B, Writing:
Band 3 4–5 • A relevant response that is expressed clearly, fluently and mostly with
concision.
• The response is well organised.
• The response is in the candidate’s own words (where appropriate),
using a range of well-chosen vocabulary which clarifies meaning.
• Spelling, punctuation and grammar are almost always accurate.
Band 2 2–3 • A relevant response that is generally expressed clearly, with some
evidence of concision.
• There may be some lapses in organisation.
• The response is mainly expressed in the candidate’s own words (where
appropriate), but there may be reliance on the words of the passage.
• There may be errors in spelling, punctuation and grammar but they do
not impede communication.
Notes
Mark holistically for writing using the mark grid above, using a ‘best fit’ approach.