Omental Rhabdo
Omental Rhabdo
Omental Rhabdo
Abstract
The greater omentum is an uncommon location for primary tumors. Metastatic tumors of the omentum are common.
In contrast, primary tumors of the omentum are very rare. Sporadic cases of primary rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) arising
in the abdomen have been reported, but these cases are limited almost exclusively to the pediatric population. We
report a well-documented case of primary intra-abdominal RMS in a 21-year-old man who presented with complaints
of abdominal pain and lump in left hypochondrium region. Imaging revealed it to be a large mass in the left
hypochondrium region displacing the bowel loops. Further investigations revealed omental RMS. The mass had
originated from the greater omentum and was excised. Our case is doing well and is presently receiving chemotherapy.
Keywords: Rhabdomyosarcoma; Greater omentum
© 2015 Pathak et al. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to
the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Pathak et al. Surgical Case Reports (2015) 1:73 Page 2 of 4
Fig. 1 Showing a large well defined mass of 9.8 × 7.4 cms along with displacement of the bowel loops
tumor with metastasis in regional lymph nodes and peri- period was uneventful. Postoperatively, upper gastro-
nodal extension. Lymph nodes were free of tumor, and intestinal endoscopy was done which was normal. He
there was only reactive hyperplasia. On cross section was discharged on the third postoperative day. Patient
examination, cut surface was homogenous grayish white underwent PET scan, which turned out to be negative
along with many areas of hemorrhage and necrosis. On for any primary disease or other secondary deposits. Pa-
microscopy, tumor cells have round to mildly pleo- tient is undergoing chemotherapy (4 cycles). Patient is
morphic nuclei, with coarse chromatin and indistinct presently on vincristine, dactinomycin, and ifosfamide
cell borders. Large areas of tumor necrosis are seen regimen (vincristine: 1.5 mg/m2 iv on day 1, dactinomy-
(Fig. 3). cin 0.75 mg/m2 iv on day 1 and 2, mesna prior to ifosfa-
Immunohistochemistry was planned in view of mul- mide 1gm/m2 on day 1 and 2, and then ifosfamide
tiple differential diagnoses in the histopathological re- 1.5gm/m2 iv on day 1 and 2). Patient is doing well and
port. Immunohistochemistry revealed strong staining for has completed all the cycles of chemotherapy. Blood in-
Vimentin, EMA, and desmin, thereby confirming the vestigations done routinely are all within normal limits.
diagnosis for RMS (Figs. 4 and 5). The postoperative Patient has been counseled to come for follow up every
Fig. 2 Intra operative finding of a large omental tumor in the left Fig. 3 H and E; 10 × 10 X shows malignant round cell tumor
hypochondrium region with areas of ulceration arranged in sheets admixed with areas of necrosis
Pathak et al. Surgical Case Reports (2015) 1:73 Page 3 of 4
Conclusions
The diagnosis of tumors in the omentum is very difficult
and requires confirmation by excision and histologic
evaluation. A primary tumor originating in the omentum
is rare but possible even as a malignant tumor. The
prognosis depends mainly on tumor biology yet the ma-
lignancy of the omentum might cause severe outcomes
because these masses can easily metastasize to mesen-
tery and peritoneum tissues.
Consent
Fig. 5 Immunohistochemistry 10 × 10 X shows tumor cells are
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient
negative for pancytokeratin
for publication of this Case report and any
Pathak et al. Surgical Case Reports (2015) 1:73 Page 4 of 4
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
MN helped in diagnosis and surgery. PP contributed to data collection, post
operative care, and creating the manuscript. PKS was the operating surgeon
and contributed to the review of the manuscript. NS was the Pathologist
incharge of the case and for provided the microphotographs. All authors
read and approved the final manuscript.
Authors’ information
PP is a junior resident and is currently doing his post graduation. MN is an
assistant professor in general surgery with experience of 5 years. PKS is a
professor and incharge of minimal invasive surgery with experience of more
than 20 years in the college institution and with many prestigious awards to
his name. NS is an associate professor in pathology.
Acknowledgements
This case report could not have been possible without the patient’s consent
and the efforts of the faculty of SRH University for their motivation and
guidance.
References
1. Ishida H, Ishida J. Primary tumours of the greater omentum. Eur Radiol.
1998;8:1598–601.
2. Leung R, Calder A. Embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma of the omentum: two
cases occurring in children. Pediatr Radiol. 2009;39:865–8.
3. Evans KJ, Miller Q, Kline AL. Solid omental tumors. New York: WebMD LLC;
2011. p. c1994–2013.
4. Sigauke E, Rakheja D, Maddox DL, Hladik CL, White CL, Timmons CF, et al.
Absence of expression of SMARCB1/INI1 in malignant rhabdoid tumors of
the central nervous system, kidneys and soft tissue: an
immunohistochemical study with implications for diagnosis. Mod Pathol.
2006;19:717–25.
5. Hilden JM, Meerbaum S, Burger P, Finlay J, Janss A, Scheithauer BW, et al.
Central nervous system atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor: results of therapy
in children enrolled in a registry. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:2877–84.
6. Arndt CAS, Stoner JA, et al. Vincristine, actinomycin, and cyclophosphamide
compared with vincristine, actinomycin, and cyclophosphamide alternating
with vincristine, topotecan, and cyclophosphamide for intermediate-risk
rhabdomyosarcoma: Children’s oncology group study D9803. J Clin Oncol.
2009;27(31):5182–8.
7. Donaldson SS, Anderson JR. Rhabdomyosarcoma: many similarities, a Few
philosphical differences. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(12):2586–7.