A.M. No.

08-11-7-SC August 28, 2009

RE: REQUEST OF NATIONAL COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AID1 TO EXEMPT LEGAL AID CLIENTS
FROM PAYING FILING, DOCKET AND OTHER FEES.

RESOLUTION

CORONA, J.:

On September 23, 2008 the Misamis Oriental Chapter of the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP)
promulgated Resolution No. 24, series of 2008.2 The resolution requested the IBP’s National
Committee on Legal Aid3 (NCLA) to ask for the exemption from the payment of filing, docket and other
fees of clients of the legal aid offices in the various IBP chapters. Resolution No. 24, series of 2008
provided:

RESOLUTION NO. 24, SERIES OF 2008

RESOLUTION OF THE IBP–MISAMIS ORIENTAL CHAPTER FOR THE IBP NATIONAL LEGAL
AID OFFICE TO REQUEST THE COURTS AND OTHER QUASI-JUDICIAL BODIES, THE
PHILIPPINE MEDIATION CENTER AND PROSECUTOR’S OFFICES TO EXEMPT LEGAL AID
CLIENTS FROM PAYING FILING, DOCKET AND OTHER FEES INCIDENTAL TO THE FILING AND
LITIGATION OF ACTIONS, AS ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS OR ON APPEAL.

WHEREAS, Section 1, Article I of the Guidelines Governing the Establishment and Operation of Legal
Aid Offices in All Chapters of the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (otherwise known as ["]Guideline[s]
on Legal Aid["]) provides: Legal aid is not a matter of charity. It is a means for the correction of social
imbalances that may often lead to injustice, for which reason, it is a public responsibility of the Bar.
The spirit of public service should therefore unde[r]ly all legal aid offices. The same should be so
administered as to give maximum possible assistance to indigent and deserving members of the
community in all cases, matters and situations in which legal aid may be necessary to forestall
injustice.

WHEREAS, Section 2 of the same provides: In order to attain the objectives of legal aid, legal aid
office should be as close as possible to those who are in need thereof – the masses. Hence, every
chapter of the IBP must establish and operate an adequate legal aid office.

WHEREAS, the Legal Aid Office of the IBP–Misamis Oriental Chapter has long been operational,
providing free legal services to numerous indigent clients, through the chapter’s members who render
volunteer services in the spirit of public service;

WHEREAS, the courts, quasi-judicial bodies, the various mediation centers and prosecutor’s offices
are collecting fees, be they filing, docket, motion, mediation or other fees in cases, be they original
proceedings or on appeal;

WHEREAS, IBP Legal Aid clients are qualified under the same indigency and merit tests used by the
Public Attorney’s Office (PAO), and would have qualified for PAO assistance, but for reasons other
than indigency, are disqualified from availing of the services of the PAO, like the existence of a conflict
of interests or conflicting defenses, and other similar causes;

WHEREAS, PAO clients are automatically exempt from the payment of docket and other fees for
cases, be they original proceedings or on appeal, by virtue of the provisions of Section 16–D of R.A.
9406 (PAO Law), without the need for the filing of any petition or motion to declare them as pauper
litigants;

WHEREAS, there is no similar provision in any substantive law or procedural law giving IBP Legal Aid
clients the same benefits or privileges enjoyed by PAO clients with respect to the payment of docket
and other fees before the courts, quasi-judicial bodies and prosecutor’s offices;

WHEREAS, the collection of docket and other fees from the IBP Legal Aid clients poses an additional
strain to their next to non-existent finances;

WHEREAS, the quarterly allowance given by the National Legal Aid Office to the IBP Misamis Oriental
Chapter is insufficient to even cover the incidental expenses of volunteer legal aid lawyers, much less
answer for the payment of docket and other fees collected by the courts, quasi-judicial bodies and
prosecutor’s offices and mediation fees collected by the Philippine Mediation Center;

NOW THEREFORE, on motion of the Board of Officers of the IBP–Misamis Oriental Chapter, be it
resolved as it is hereby resolved, to move the IBP National Legal Aid Office to make the necessary
requests or representations with the Supreme Court, the Philippine Mediation Center, the Department
of Justice and the National Prosecution Service and other quasi-judicial agencies to effect the grant
of a like exemption from the payment of filing, docket and other fees to the IBP Legal Aid clients as
that enjoyed by PAO clients, towards the end that IBP Legal Aid clients be automatically exempted
from the filing of the abovementioned fees;

RESOLVED FURTHER, that copies of this Resolution be furnished to Supreme Court Chief Justice
Honorable Reynato S. Puno, IBP National President Feliciano M. Bautista, the IBP Board of
Governors, Secretary of Justice Hon. Raul M. Gonzalez, the National Supervisor of the Philippine
Mediation Center, the National Labor Relations Commission, the Civil Service Commission and other
quasi-judicial bodies and their local offices;

RESOLVED FINALLY to move the IBP Board of Governors and National Officers to make the
necessary representations with the National Legislature and its members to effect the filing of a bill
before the House of Representatives and the Senate granting exemption to IBP Legal Aid clients from
the payment of docket, filing and or other fees in cases before the courts, quasi-judicial agencies and
prosecutor’s offices and the mediation centers.

Done this 23rd day of September 2008, Cagayan De Oro City.

Unanimously approved upon motion severally seconded.4

The Court noted Resolution No. 24, series of 2008 and required the IBP, through the NCLA, to
comment thereon.5

In a comment dated December 18, 2008,6 the IBP, through the NCLA, made the following comments:

(a) Under Section 16-D of RA7 9406, clients of the Public Attorneys’ Office (PAO) are exempt
from the payment of docket and other fees incidental to the institution of action in court and
other quasi-judicial bodies. On the other hand, clients of legal aid offices in the various IBP
chapters do not enjoy the same exemption. IBP’s indigent clients are advised to litigate as
pauper litigants under Section 21, Rule 3 of the Rules of Court;
 (b) They are further advised to submit documentary evidence to prove compliance with the
requirements under Section 21, Rule 3 of the Rules of Court, i.e., certifications from
the barangay and the Department of Social Welfare and Development. However, not only
does the process involve some expense which indigent clients could ill-afford, clients also lack
knowledge on how to go about the tedious process of obtaining these documents;

(c) Although the IBP is given an annual legal aid subsidy, the amount it receives from the
government is barely enough to cover various operating expenses;8

(d) While each IBP local chapter is given a quarterly allocation (from the legal aid
subsidy),9 said allocation covers neither the incidental expenses defrayed by legal aid lawyers
in handling legal aid cases nor the payment of docket and other fees collected by the courts,
quasi-judicial bodies and the prosecutor’s office, as well as mediation fees and

(e) Considering the aforementioned factors, a directive may be issued by the Supreme Court
granting IBP’s indigent clients an exemption from the payment of docket and other fees similar
to that given to PAO clients under Section 16-D of RA 9406. In this connection, the Supreme
Court previously issued a circular exempting IBP clients from the payment of transcript of
stenographic notes.10

At the outset, we laud the Misamis Oriental Chapter of the IBP for its effort to help improve the
administration of justice, particularly, the access to justice by the poor. Its Resolution No. 24, series of
2008 in fact echoes one of the noteworthy recommendations during the Forum on Increasing Access
to Justice spearheaded by the Court last year. In promulgating Resolution No. 24, the Misamis Oriental
Chapter of the IBP has effectively performed its duty to "participate in the development of the legal
system by initiating or supporting efforts in law reform and in the administration of justice." 11

We now move on to determine the merits of the request.

Access to Justice:
Making an Ideal a Reality

Access to justice by all, especially by the poor, is not simply an ideal in our society. Its existence is
essential in a democracy and in the rule of law. As such, it is guaranteed by no less than the
fundamental law:

Sec. 11. Free access to the courts and quasi-judicial bodies and adequate legal assistance shall
not be denied to any person by reason of poverty.12 (emphasis supplied)

The Court recognizes the right of access to justice as the most important pillar of legal empowerment
of the marginalized sectors of our society.13 Among others, it has exercised its power to "promulgate
rules concerning the protection and enforcement of constitutional rights"14 to open the doors of justice
to the underprivileged and to allow them to step inside the courts to be heard of their plaints. In
particular, indigent litigants are permitted under Section 21, Rule 315 and Section 19, Rule 14116 of the
Rules of Court to bring suits in forma pauperis.

The IBP, pursuant to its general objectives to "improve the administration of justice and enable the
Bar to discharge its public responsibility more effectively,"17 assists the Court in providing the poor
access to justice. In particular, it renders free legal aid under the supervision of the NCLA.
A New Rule, a New Tool
for Access to Justice

Under the IBP’s Guidelines Governing the Establishment and Operation of Legal Aid Offices in All
Chapters of the IBP (Guidelines on Legal Aid), the combined "means and merit tests" shall be used to
determine the eligibility of an applicant for legal aid:

ARTICLE VIII
TESTS

SEC. 19. Combined tests. – The Chapter Legal Aid Committee or the [NCLA], as the case may be,
shall pass upon the request for legal aid by the combined application of the means test and merit test,
and the consideration of other factors adverted to in the following sections.

SEC. 20. Means test. – The means test aims at determining whether the applicant has no visible
means of support or his income is otherwise insufficient to provide the financial resources necessary
to engage competent private counsel owing to the demands for subsistence of his family, considering
the number of his dependents and the conditions prevailing in the locality.

The means test shall not be applicable to applicants who fall under the Developmental Legal Aid
Program such as Overseas Filipino Workers, fishermen, farmers, women and children and other
disadvantaged groups.

SEC. 21. Merit test. – The merit test seeks to ascertain whether or not the applicant’s cause of action
or his defense is valid and chances of establishing the same appear reasonable.

SEC. 22. Other factors. – The effect of the Legal Aid Service or of the failure to render the same upon
the Rule of Law, the proper administration of justice, the public interest involved in given cases and
the practice of law in the locality shall likewise be considered.

SEC. 23. Private practice. – Care shall be taken that the Legal aid is not availed of to the detriment of
the private practice of law, or taken advantage of by anyone for personal ends.

SEC. 24. Denial. – Legal aid may be denied to an applicant already receiving adequate assistance
from any source other than the Integrated Bar.

The "means and merit tests" appear to be reasonable determinants of eligibility for coverage under
the legal aid program of the IBP. Nonetheless, they may be improved to ensure that any exemption
from the payment of legal fees that may be granted to clients of the NCLA and the legal aid offices of
the various IBP chapters will really further the right of access to justice by the poor. This will guarantee
that the exemption will neither be abused nor trivialized. Towards this end, the following shall be
observed by the NCLA and the legal aid offices in IBP chapters nationwide in accepting clients and
handling cases for the said clients:

A.M. No. 08-11-7-SC (IRR): Re: Rule on the Exemption From the Payment of Legal Fees of the
Clients of the National Committee on Legal Aid and of the Legal Aid Offices in the Local
Chapters of the Integrated Bar of the Philippines

Rule on the Exemption From the Payment of Legal Fees of the Clients of the National
Committee on Legal Aid (NCLA) and of the Legal Aid Offices in the Local Chapters of the
Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP)
 ARTICLE I
Purpose

Section 1. Purpose. – This Rule is issued for the purpose of enforcing the right of free access to courts
by the poor guaranteed under Section 11, Article III of the Constitution. It is intended to increase the
access to justice by the poor by exempting from the payment of legal fees incidental to instituting an
action in court, as an original proceeding or on appeal, qualified indigent clients of the NCLA and of
the legal aid offices in local IBP chapters nationwide.

ARTICLE II
Definition of Terms

Section 1. Definition of important terms. – For purposes of this Rule and as used herein, the following
terms shall be understood to be how they are defined under this Section:

(a) "Developmental legal aid" means the rendition of legal services in public interest causes
involving overseas workers, fisherfolk, farmers, laborers, indigenous cultural communities,
women, children and other disadvantaged groups and marginalized sectors;

(b) "Disinterested person" refers to the punong barangay having jurisdiction over the place
where an applicant for legal aid or client of the NCLA or chapter legal aid office resides;

(c) "Falsity" refers to any material misrepresentation of fact or any fraudulent, deceitful, false,
wrong or misleading statement in the application or affidavits submitted to support it or the
affidavit of a disinterested person required to be submitted annually under this Rule which may
substantially affect the determination of the qualifications of the applicant or the client under
the means and merit tests;

(d) "Legal fees" refers to the legal fees imposed under Rule 141 of the Rules of Court as a
necessary incident of instituting an action in court either as an original proceeding or on appeal.
In particular, it includes filing or docket fees, appeal fees, fees for issuance of provisional
remedies, mediation fees, sheriff’s fees, stenographer’s fees (that is fees for transcript of
stenographic notes) and commissioner’s fees;

(e) "Means test" refers to the set of criteria used to determine whether the applicant is one who
has no money or property sufficient and available for food, shelter and basic necessities for
himself and his family;

(f) "Merit test" refers to the ascertainment of whether the applicant’s cause of action or his
defense is valid and whether the chances of establishing the same appear reasonable and

(g) "Representative" refers to the person authorized to file an application for legal aid in behalf
of the applicant when the said applicant is prevented by a compelling reason from personally
filing his application. As a rule, it refers to the immediate family members of the applicant.
However, it may include any of the applicant’s relatives or any person or concerned citizen of
sufficient discretion who has first-hand knowledge of the personal circumstances of the
applicant as well as of the facts of the applicant’s case.

ARTICLE III
Coverage
Section 1. Persons qualified for exemption from payment of legal fees. – Persons who shall enjoy the
benefit of exemption from the payment of legal fees incidental to instituting an action in court, as an
original proceeding or on appeal, granted under this Rule shall be limited only to clients of the NCLA
and the chapter legal aid offices.

The said clients shall refer to those indigents qualified to receive free legal aid service from the NCLA
and the chapter legal aid offices. Their qualifications shall be determined based on the tests provided
in this Rule.

Section 2. Persons not covered by the Rule. – The following shall be disqualified from the coverage
of this Rule. Nor may they be accepted as clients by the NCLA and the chapter legal aid offices.

(a) Juridical persons; except in cases covered by developmental legal aid or public interest
causes involving juridical entities which are non-stock, non-profit organizations, non-
governmental organizations and people’s organizations whose individual members will pass
the means test provided in this Rule;

(b) Persons who do not pass the means and merit tests;

(c) Parties already represented by a counsel de parte;

(d) Owners or lessors of residential lands or buildings with respect to the filing of collection or
unlawful detainer suits against their tenants and

(e) Persons who have been clients of the NCLA or chapter legal aid office previously in a case
where the NCLA or chapter legal aid office withdrew its representation because of a falsity in
the application or in any of the affidavits supporting the said application.

Section 3. Cases not covered by the Rule. – The NCLA and the chapter legal aid offices shall not
handle the following:

(a) Cases where conflicting interests will be represented by the NCLA and the chapter legal
aid offices and

(b) Prosecution of criminal cases in court.

ARTICLE IV
Tests of Indigency

Section 1. Tests for determining who may be clients of the NCLA and the legal aid offices in local IBP
chapters. – The NCLA or the chapter legal aid committee, as the case may be, shall pass upon
requests for legal aid by the combined application of the means and merit tests and the consideration
of other relevant factors provided for in the following sections.

Section 2. Means test; exception. – (a) This test shall be based on the following criteria: (i) the applicant
and that of his immediate family must have a gross monthly income that does not exceed an amount
double the monthly minimum wage of an employee in the place where the applicant resides and (ii)
he does not own real property with a fair market value as stated in the current tax declaration of more
than Three Hundred Thousand (₱300,000.00) Pesos.
In this connection, the applicant shall execute an affidavit of indigency (printed at the back of the
application form) stating that he and his immediate family do not earn a gross income abovementioned,
nor own any real property with the fair value aforementioned, supported by an affidavit of a
disinterested person attesting to the truth of the applicant’s affidavit. The latest income tax return
and/or current tax declaration, if any, shall be attached to the applicant’s affidavit.

(b) The means test shall not be applicable to applicants who fall under the developmental legal aid
program such as overseas workers, fisherfolk, farmers, laborers, indigenous cultural communities,
women, children and other disadvantaged groups.

Section 3. Merit test. – A case shall be considered meritorious if an assessment of the law and
evidence at hand discloses that the legal service will be in aid of justice or in the furtherance thereof,
taking into consideration the interests of the party and those of society. A case fails this test if, after
consideration of the law and evidence presented by the applicant, it appears that it is intended merely
to harass or injure the opposite party or to work oppression or wrong.

Section 4. Other relevant factors that may be considered. – The effect of legal aid or of the failure to
render the same upon the rule of law, the proper administration of justice, the public interest involved
in a given case and the practice of law in the locality shall likewise be considered.

ARTICLE V
Acceptance and Handling of Cases

Section 1. Procedure in accepting cases. – The following procedure shall be observed in the
acceptance of cases for purposes of this Rule:

(a) Filing of application – An application shall be made personally by the applicant, unless
there is a compelling reason which prevents him from doing so, in which case his
representative may apply for him. It shall adhere substantially to the form made for that
purpose. It shall be prepared and signed by the applicant or, in proper cases, his duly
authorized representative in at least three copies.

Applications for legal aid shall be filed with the NCLA or with the chapter legal aid committee.

The NCLA shall, as much as possible, concentrate on cases of paramount importance or

Requests received by the IBP National Office shall be referred by the NCLA to the proper
chapter legal aid committee of the locality where the cases have to be filed or are pending.
The chapter president and the chairman of the chapter’s legal aid committee shall be advised
of such referral.

(b) Interview – The applicant shall be interviewed by a member of the chapter legal aid
committee or any chapter member authorized by the chapter legal aid committee to determine
the applicant’s qualifications based on the means and merit tests and other relevant factors.
He shall also be required to submit copies of his latest income tax returns and/or current tax
declaration, if available, and execute an affidavit of indigency printed at the back of the
application form with the supporting affidavit of a disinterested person attesting to the truth of
the applicant’s affidavit.
lawph!l
After the interview, the applicant shall be informed that he can follow up the action on his
application after five (5) working days.

(c) Action on the application – The chapter legal aid committee shall pass upon every request
for legal aid and submit its recommendation to the chapter board of officers within three (3)
working days after the interview of the applicant. The basis of the recommendation shall be
stated.

The chapter board of officers shall review and act on the recommendation of the chapter legal
aid committee within two (2) working days from receipt thereof; Provided, however, that in
urgent matters requiring prompt or immediate action, the chapter’s executive director of legal
aid or whoever performs his functions may provisionally act on the application, subject to
review by the chapter legal aid committee and, thereafter, by the chapter board of officers.

The action of the chapter board of officers on the application shall be final.

(d) Cases which may be provisionally accepted. – In the following cases, the NCLA or the
chapter legal aid office, through the chapter’s executive director of legal aid or whoever
performs his functions may accept cases provisionally pending verification of the applicant’s
indigency and an evaluation of the merit of his case.

(i) Where a warrant for the arrest of the applicant has been issued;

(ii) Where a pleading has to be filed immediately to avoid adverse effects to the applicant;

(iii) Where an appeal has to be urgently perfected or a petition for certiorari, prohibition or
mandamus filed has to be filed immediately; and

(iv) Other similar urgent cases.

(e) Assignment of control number – Upon approval of the chapter board of officers of a person’s
application and the applicant is found to be qualified for legal assistance, the case shall be
assigned a control number. The numbering shall be consecutive starting from January to
December of every year. The control number shall also indicate the region and the chapter
handling the case.

Example:

Region18 Chapter Year Month Number

GM - Manila - 2009 - 03 - 099

(f) Issuance of a certification – After an application is approved and a control number duly
assigned, the chapter board of officers shall issue a certification that the person (that is, the
successful applicant) is a client of the NCLA or of the chapter legal aid office. The certification
shall bear the control number of the case and shall state the name of the client and the nature
of the judicial action subject of the legal aid of the NCLA or the legal aid office of a local IBP
chapter.

The certification shall be issued to the successful applicant free of charge.

In case no chapter member has signified an intention to handle the case voluntarily, the chapter legal
aid committee shall refer the matter to the chapter board of officers together with the names of at least
three members who, in the chapter legal aid committee’s discretion, may competently render legal aid
on the matter. The chapter board of officers shall appoint one chapter member from among the list of
names submitted by the chapter legal aid committee. The chapter member chosen may not refuse the
appointment except on the ground of conflict of interest or other equally compelling grounds as
provided in the Code of Professional Responsibility,19 in which case the chapter board of officers shall
appoint his replacement from among the remaining names in the list previously submitted by the
chapter legal aid committee.

The chapter legal aid committee and the chapter board of officers shall take the necessary measures
to ensure that cases are well-distributed to chapter members.

Section 3. Policies and guidelines in the acceptance and handling of cases. – The following policies
and guidelines shall be observed in the acceptance and handling of cases:

(a) First come, first served – Where both the complainant/plaintiff/petitioner and defendant/
respondent apply for legal aid and both are qualified, the first to seek assistance shall be given
preference.

(b) Avoidance of conflict of interest – Where acceptance of a case will give rise to a conflict of
interest on the part of the chapter legal aid office, the applicant shall be duly informed and
advised to seek the services of a private counsel or another legal aid organization.

Where handling of the case will give rise to a conflict of interest on the part of the chapter
member assigned to the case, the client shall be duly informed and advised about it. The
handling lawyer shall also inform the chapter legal aid committee so that another chapter
member may be assigned to handle the case. For purposes of choosing the substitute handling
lawyer, the rule in the immediately preceding section shall be observed.

(c) Legal aid is purely gratuitous and honorary – No member of the chapter or member of the
staff of the NCLA or chapter legal aid office shall directly or indirectly demand or request from
an applicant or client any compensation, gift or present for legal aid services being applied for
or rendered.

(d) Same standard of conduct and equal treatment – A chapter member who is tasked to
handle a case accepted by the NCLA or by the chapter legal aid office shall observe the same
standard of conduct governing his relations with paying clients. He shall treat the client of the
NCLA or of the chapter legal aid office and the said client’s case in a manner that is equal and
similar to his treatment of a paying client and his case.

(e) Falsity in the application or in the affidavits – Any falsity in the application or in the affidavit
of indigency or in the affidavit of a disinterested person shall be sufficient cause for the NCLA
or chapter legal aid office to withdraw or terminate the legal aid. For this purpose, the chapter
board of officers shall authorize the handling lawyer to file the proper manifestation of
withdrawal of appearance of the chapter legal aid office in the case with a motion for the
dismissal of the complaint or action of the erring client. The court, after hearing, shall approve
 the withdrawal of appearance and grant the motion, without prejudice to whatever criminal
liability may have been incurred.

Violation of this policy shall disqualify the erring client from availing of the benefits of this Rule
in the future.

(f) Statement in the initiatory pleading – To avail of the benefits of the Rule, the initiatory
pleading shall state as an essential preliminary allegation that (i) the party initiating the action
is a client of the NCLA or of the chapter legal aid office and therefore entitled to exemption
from the payment of legal fees under this Rule and (ii) a certified true copy of the certification
issued pursuant to Section 1(e), of this Article is attached or annexed to the pleading.

Failure to make the statement shall be a ground for the dismissal of the action without prejudice
to its refiling.

The same rule shall apply in case the client, through the NCLA or chapter legal aid office, files
an appeal.

(g) Attachment of certification in initiatory pleading – A certified true copy of the certification
issued pursuant to Section 1(e), of this Article shall be attached as an annex to the initiatory
pleading.

Failure to attach a certified true copy of the said certification shall be a ground for the dismissal
of the action without prejudice to its refiling.

The same rule shall apply in case the client, through the NCLA or chapter legal aid office, files
an appeal.

(h) Signing of pleadings – All complaints, petitions, answers, replies, memoranda and other
important pleadings or motions to be filed in courts shall be signed by the handling lawyer and
co-signed by the chairperson or a member of the chapter legal aid committee, or in urgent
cases, by the executive director of legal aid or whoever performs his functions.

Ordinary motions such as motions for extension of time to file a pleading or for postponement
of hearing and manifestations may be signed by the handling lawyer alone.

(i) Motions for extension of time or for postponement – The filing of motions for extension of
time to file a pleading or for postponement of hearing shall be avoided as much as possible as
they cause delay to the case and prolong the proceedings.

(j) Transfer of cases – Transfer of cases from one handling lawyer to another shall be affected
only upon approval of the chapter legal aid committee.

Section 4. Decision to appeal. – (a) All appeals must be made on the request of the client himself. For
this purpose, the client shall be made to fill up a request to appeal.

(b) Only meritorious cases shall be appealed. If the handling lawyer, in consultation with the chapter
legal aid committee, finds that there is no merit to the appeal, the client should be immediately informed
thereof in writing and the record of the case turned over to him, under proper receipt. If the client insists
on appealing the case, the lawyer handling the case should perfect the appeal before turning over the
records of the case to him.
Section 5. Protection of private practice. – Utmost care shall be taken to ensure that legal aid is neither
availed of to the detriment of the private practice of law nor taken advantage of by anyone for purely
personal ends.

ARTICLE VI
Withdrawal of Legal Aid and Termination of Exemption

Section 1. Withdrawal of legal aid. – The NCLA or the chapter legal aid committee may, in justifiable
instances as provided in the next Section, direct the handling lawyer to withdraw representation of a
client’s cause upon approval of the IBP Board of Governors (in the case of the NCLA) or of the chapter
board of officers (in the case of the chapter legal aid committee) and through a proper motion filed in
Court.

Section 2. Grounds for withdrawal of legal aid. – Withdrawal may be warranted in the following
situations:

(a) In a case that has been provisionally accepted, where it is subsequently ascertained that
the client is not qualified for legal aid;

(b) Where the client’s income or resources improve and he no longer qualifies for continued
assistance based on the means test. For this purpose, on or before January 15 every year,
the client shall submit an affidavit of a disinterested person stating that the client and his
immediate family do not earn a gross income mentioned in Section 2, Article V, nor own any
real property with the fair market value mentioned in the same Section;

(c) When it is shown or found that the client committed a falsity in the application or in the
affidavits submitted to support the application;

(d) When the client subsequently engages a de parte counsel or is provided with a de
oficio counsel;

(e) When, despite proper advice from the handling lawyer, the client cannot be refrained from
doing things which the lawyer himself ought not do under the ethics of the legal profession,
particularly with reference to their conduct towards courts, judicial officers, witnesses and
litigants, or the client insists on having control of the trial, theory of the case, or strategy in
procedure which would tend to result in incalculable harm to the interests of the client;

(f) When, despite notice from the handling lawyer, the client does not cooperate or coordinate
with the handling lawyer to the prejudice of the proper and effective rendition of legal aid such
as when the client fails to provide documents necessary to support his case or unreasonably
fails to attend hearings when his presence thereat is required; and

(g) When it becomes apparent that the representation of the client’s cause will result in a
representation of conflicting interests, as where the adverse party had previously engaged the
services of the NCLA or of the chapter legal aid office and the subject matter of the litigation
is directly related to the services previously rendered to the adverse party.

Section 3. Effect of withdrawal. – The court, after hearing, shall allow the NCLA or the chapter legal
aid office to withdraw if it is satisfied that the ground for such withdrawal exists.
Except when the withdrawal is based on paragraphs (b), (d) and (g) of the immediately preceding
Section, the court shall also order the dismissal of the case. Such dismissal is without prejudice to
whatever criminal liability may have been incurred if the withdrawal is based on paragraph (c) of the
immediately preceding Section.

ARTICLE VII
Miscellaneous Provisions

Section 1. Lien on favorable judgment. – The amount of the docket and other lawful fees which the
client was exempted from paying shall be a lien on any judgment rendered in the case favorable to
the indigent, unless the court otherwise provides.

In case, attorney’s fees have been awarded to the client, the same shall belong to the NCLA or to the
chapter legal aid office that rendered the legal aid, as the case may be. It shall form part of a special
fund which shall be exclusively used to support the legal aid program of the NCLA or the chapter legal
aid office. In this connection, the chapter board of officers shall report the receipt of attorney’s fees
pursuant to this Section to the NCLA within ten (10) days from receipt thereof. The NCLA shall, in turn,
include the data on attorney’s fees received by IBP chapters pursuant to this Section in its liquidation
report for the annual subsidy for legal aid.1awp hi1

Section 2. Duty of NCLA to prepare forms. – The NCLA shall prepare the standard forms to be used
in connection with this Rule. In particular, the NCLA shall prepare the following standard forms: the
application form, the affidavit of indigency, the supporting affidavit of a disinterested person, the
affidavit of a disinterested person required to be submitted annually under Section 2(b), Article VI, the
certification issued by the NCLA or the chapter board of officers under Section 1(f), Article V and the
request to appeal.

The said forms, except the certification, shall be in Filipino. Within sixty (60) days from receipt of the
forms from the NCLA, the chapter legal aid offices shall make translations of the said forms in the
dominant dialect used in their respective localities.

Section 3. Effect of Rule on right to bring suits in forma pauperis. – Nothing in this Rule shall be
considered to preclude those persons not covered either by this Rule or by the exemption from the
payment of legal fees granted to clients of the Public Attorney’s Office under Section 16-D of RA 9406
to litigate in forma pauperis under Section 21, Rule 3 and Section 19 Rule 141 of the Rules of Court.

Section 4. Compliance with Rule on Mandatory Legal Aid Service. – Legal aid service rendered by a
lawyer under this Rule either as a handling lawyer or as an interviewer of applicants under Section
1(b), Article IV hereof shall be credited for purposes of compliance with the Rule on Mandatory Legal
Aid Service.

The chairperson of the chapter legal aid office shall issue the certificate similar to that issued by the
Clerk of Court in Section 5(b) of the Rule on Mandatory Legal Aid Service.

ARTICLE VIII
Effectivity

Section 1. Effectivity. – This Rule shall become effective after fifteen days following its publication in a
newspaper of general circulation.
The above rule, in conjunction with Section 21, Rule 3 and Section 19, Rule 141 of the Rules of Court,
the Rule on Mandatory Legal Aid Service and the Rule of Procedure for Small Claims Cases, shall
form a solid base of rules upon which the right of access to courts by the poor shall be implemented.
With these rules, we equip the poor with the tools to effectively, efficiently and easily enforce their
rights in the judicial system.

A Final Word

Equity will not suffer a wrong to be without a remedy. Ubi jus ibi remedium. Where there is a right,
there must be a remedy. The remedy must not only be effective and efficient, but also readily
accessible. For a remedy that is inaccessible is no remedy at all.

The Constitution guarantees the rights of the poor to free access to the courts and to adequate legal
assistance. The legal aid service rendered by the NCLA and legal aid offices of IBP chapters
nationwide addresses only the right to adequate legal assistance. Recipients of the service of the
NCLA and legal aid offices of IBP chapters may enjoy free access to courts by exempting them from
the payment of fees assessed in connection with the filing of a complaint or action in court. With these
twin initiatives, the guarantee of Section 11, Article III of Constitution is advanced and access to justice
is increased by bridging a significant gap and removing a major roadblock.

WHEREFORE, the Misamis Oriental Chapter of the Integrated Bar of the Philippines is
hereby COMMENDED for helping increase the access to justice by the poor. The request of the
Misamis Oriental Chapter for the exemption from the payment of filing, docket and other fees of the
clients of the legal aid offices of the various IBP chapters is GRANTED. The Rule on the Exemption
From the Payment of Legal Fees of the Clients of the National Committee on Legal Aid (NCLA) and
of the Legal Aid Offices in the Local Chapters of the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) (which
shall be assigned the docket number A.M. No. 08-11-7-SC [IRR] provided in this resolution is
hereby APPROVED. In this connection, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to cause the publication of
the said rule in a newspaper of general circulation within five days from the promulgation of this
resolution.

The Office of the Court Administrator is hereby directed to promptly issue a circular to inform all courts
in the Philippines of the import of this resolution.

SO ORDERED.