Our Lady of The Pillar College - Cauayan
Our Lady of The Pillar College - Cauayan
Our Lady of The Pillar College - Cauayan
True-False
1. Absorption costing incomes are always higher than variable costing incomes.
2. Income under standard variable costing is not influenced by the total amount of
fixed manufacturing costs.
4. A major difference between standard costing and normal costing is that one uses
actual hours to apply overhead and the other uses standard hours.
5. Proponents of variable costing for external reporting argue that while fixed
production costs benefit production as a whole, they do not benefit any
particular unit of product.
10. According to GAAP, absorption costing must be used for external financial
reporting.
A. Aero Co. operated at normal capacity of 50,000 units in the year 2006. The company sold 80% of
these units at a price of P 130.00 per unit. Manufacturing cost incurred during the year is as follows:
B. Baron Co. makes study tables. The table sells for P 1,200 each. Data for last year’s operations follow:
Units:
Beginning inventory 20
Production 500
Ending inventory 50
Fixed cost:
Factory overhead P 85,000
Selling and administrative 50,000
Required:
(1) Prepare comparative income statements under both the absorption and variable
costing methods using the following format:
Baron Company
Comparative Income Statements
Absorption vs. Variable Costing
For the Period______________
Absorption Variable
Sales P _________ P _________
Cost of goods sold / variable cost:
Cost of goods sold P _________ P _________
Variable selling and administrative _________ _________
Total P _________ P _________
Gross profit / contribution margin P _________ P _________
Operating expenses / fixed cost:
Fixed factory overhead P _________ P _________
Variable selling and administrative _________ _________
Fixed selling and administrative _________ _________
Total P _________ P _________
Profit P _________ P _________
The company’s selling and administrative expenses consist of P 30,000 per year in fixed expenses
and P 6.00 per unit sold in variable expenses. The company’s unit product cost is computed
as follows:
Direct materials P 20
Direct labor 8
Variable manufacturing overhead 4
Fixed manufacturing overhead
(P 25,000 divide by normal capacity of 2,500 units) 10
Unit product cost P 42
==
Required:
(1) Redo the company’s income statement in the contribution format using variable
costing.
(2) Reconcile any difference between the net income figure on your variable costing
income statement and the net income figure on the absorption costing income
statement above.
D. PusongBato Company sells a single product for P25. It had no beginning inventories. Operating data follow.
e. Ending inventory.
f. Volume variance.
g. Income.
E. DingAngBato Company sells a single product for P25. It had no beginning inventories. Operating data follow.
3. Rock-Rock Company sells a single product for P25. It had no beginning inventories. Operating data follow.
There were no variable cost variances for the year. Fixed costs incurred were equal to the budgeted amount.
There were no beginning inventories and no selling or administrative expenses.
a. Compute the absorption costing income if fixed costs per unit are determined using normal capacity.
b. Compute the absorption costing income if fixed costs per unit are determined using practical capacity.
c. Compute the absorption costing income if fixed costs per unit are determined using budgeted production.