Ignited Minds Journals

Internationally Indexed, Peer Reviewed & Refereed Journals, Approved and Indexed by UGC

Journal of Advances and Scholarly Researches in Allied Education

(JASRAE)
- Multidisciplinary Academic Research

Indexing and Impact Factor :

UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION (UGC) : 49103 (2017)

IIFS : 1.6 (2014)

INDEX COPERNICUS : 49060 (2018)

IJINDEX : 3.46 (2018)

Read / Download More Articles

 Journal of Advances and Scholarly Researches in Allied Education
Vol. 16, Issue No. 4, March-2019, ISSN 2230-7540

A Research on Ring Theory and Its Basic

Applications: Fundamental Concept

Priyanka*

Assistant Professor of Mathematics, CRM JAT College, Hisar

Abstract – Ring theory is one of the parts of the abstract algebra that has been comprehensively utilized
in images. Be that as it may, ring theory has not been connected with picture segmentation. In this
paper, we propose another list of likeness among images utilizing __ rings and the entropy function. This
new file was connected as another ceasing standard to the Mean Shift Iterative Algorithm with the
objective to achieve a superior segmentation. An investigation on the execution of the algorithm with
this new halting standard is completed. Though ring theory and class theory at first pursued diverse
bearings it turned out during the 1970s – that the study of functor classifications additionally uncovers
new angles for module theory.

-----------------------------------X----------------------------------

INTRODUCTION commitments from different fields, chiefly number

theory, the ring idea was summed up and solidly
In mathematics, a ring is an algebraic structure settled during the 1920s by Emmy Noether and
comprising of a set together with two binary Wolfgang Krull. Present day ring theory—an
operations for the most part called addition and exceptionally dynamic numerical control—ponders
multiplication, where the set is an abelian bunch rings in their very own right. To investigate rings,
under addition (called the additive gathering of the mathematicians have concocted different ideas to
ring) and a monoid under multiplication to such an break rings into littler, better-reasonable pieces, for
extent that multiplication disseminates over addition. example, ideals, quotient rings and basic rings. In
As such the ring axioms necessitate that addition is addition to these abstract properties, ring theorists
commutative, addition and multiplication are additionally make different qualifications between
cooperative, multiplication circulates over addition, the theory of commutative rings and
every component in the set has an additive inverse, noncommutative rings—the previous having a
and there exists an additive personality. A standout place with algebraic number theory and algebraic
amongst the most well-known examples of a ring is geometry. An especially rich theory has been
the arrangement of whole numbers supplied with its created for a specific unique class of commutative
regular operations of addition and multiplication. rings, known as fields, which exists in the domain
Certain varieties of the definition of a ring are at of field theory. Similarly, the relating theory for
times utilized, and these are plot later in the article. noncommutative rings, that of noncommutative
division rings, comprises a functioning examination
The part of mathematics that reviews rings is known enthusiasm for noncommutative ring theorists.
as ring theory. Ring theorists study properties basic Since the disclosure of a strange association
to both well-known scientific structures, for example, between noncommutative ring theory and geometry
whole numbers and polynomials, and to the a lot less during the 1980s by Alain Connes,
outstanding numerical structures that additionally noncommutative geometry has turned into an
fulfill the axioms of ring theory. The universality of especially dynamic control in ring theory.
rings makes them a focal sorting out guideline of
contemporary mathematics. A ring will be characterized as an abstract structure
with a commutative addition, and a multiplication
Ring theory might be utilized to comprehend major which might be commutative. This qualification
physical laws, for example, those basic exceptional yields two very unique hypotheses: the theory of
relativity and symmetry marvels in sub-atomic individually commutative or non-commutative rings.
www.ignited.in

science. These notes are predominantly worried about

commutative rings.
The idea of a ring initially emerged from endeavors
to demonstrate Fermat's last theorem, beginning with Non-commutative rings have been an object of
Richard Dedekind during the 1880s. After methodical study just as of late, during the

Priyanka* 453
 A Research on Ring Theory and Its Basic Applications: Fundamental Concept

twentieth century. Commutative rings in actuality motivation in 1843, when he comprehended that the
have showed up however in a shrouded manner speculation was not to three measurements but
much previously, and the same number of rather to four measurements and that the cost to pay
speculations, everything returns to Fermat's Last was to surrender the commutativity of multiplication.
Theorem. The quaternion algebra, as Hamilton called it,
propelled non-commutative ring theory.
In 1847, the mathematician Lam'e declared an
answer of Fermat's Last Theorem, yet Liouville saw A ring is a set A with two binary operations fulfilling
that the proof relied upon a one of a kind the guidelines given underneath. Typically one binary
disintegration into primes, which he thought was task is signified '+' and called \addition," and the
probably not going to be valid. In spite of the fact that other is indicated by juxtaposition and is called
Cauchy bolstered Lam'e, Kummer was the person \multiplication." The standards expected of these
who at last distributed an example in 1844 to operations are:
demonstrate that the uniqueness of prime
deteriorations fizzled. After two years, he 1) An is an abelian bunch under the task +
reestablished the uniqueness by presenting what he (personality meant 0 and inverse of x
called "perfect complex numbers" (today, basically indicated −x);
"ideals") and utilized it to demonstrate Fermat's Last
Theorem for all n < 100 aside from n = 37, 59, 67 2) A will be a monoid under the activity of
and 74. multiplication (i.e., multiplication is
acquainted and there is a two-sided
It is Dedekind who separated the imperative personality normally signified 1);
properties of "perfect numbers", characterized a
"perfect" by its cutting edge properties: to be specific 3) the distributive laws
that of being a subgroup which is shut under
multiplication by any ring component. He further (x + y)z = xy + xz
presented prime ideals as a speculation of prime
numbers. Note that today regardless we utilize the x(y + z) = xy + xz
wording "Dedekind rings" to portray rings which have
specifically a decent conduct concerning factorization hold for all x, y, and z  A.
of prime ideals. In 1882, a vital paper by Dedekind
and Weber built up the theory of rings of Once in a while one doesn't necessitate that a ring
polynomials. have a multiplicative character. The word ring may
likewise be utilized for a framework fulfilling just
At this stage, the two rings of polynomials and rings conditions (1) and (3) (i.e., where the cooperative
of numbers (rings appearing with regards to Fermat's law for multiplication may come up short and for
Last Theorem, for example, what we consider now which there is no multiplicative personality.) Lie
the Gaussian whole numbers) were being examined. rings are examples of non-affiliated rings without
Be that as it may, it was independently, and nobody characters. Practically all fascinating acquainted
made association between these two subjects. rings do have personalities.
Dedekind likewise presented the expression "field"
(K¨orper) for a commutative ring in which each non- On the off chance that 1 = 0, at that point the ring
zero component has a multiplicative inverse yet comprises of one component 0; generally 1 ≠ 0. In
"ring" is because of Hilbert, who, inspired by studying numerous theorems, it is important to determine
invariant theory, contemplated ideals in polynomial that rings under thought are not trifling, for example
rings demonstrating his well known "Premise that 1 ≠ 0, however regularly that speculation won't
Theorem" in 1893. be expressed unequivocally.
It will take an additional 30 years and crafted by On the off chance that the multiplicative activity is
Emmy Noether and Krull to see the advancement of commutative, we call the ring commutative.
axioms for rings. Emmy Noether, around 1921, is the Commutative Algebra is the study of commutative
person who made the critical advance of bringing the rings and related structures. It is firmly identified
two speculations of rings of polynomials and rings of with algebraic number theory and algebraic
numbers under a solitary theory of abstract geometry.
commutative rings.
On the off chance that A will be a ring, a
Rather than commutative ring theory, which component x  A is known as a unit on the off
www.ignited.in

developed from number theory, non-commutative chance that it has a two-sided inverse y, for
ring theory created from a thought of Hamilton, who example xy = yx = 1. Plainly the inverse of a unit is
endeavored to sum up the mind boggling numbers additionally a unit, and it isn't difficult to see that the
as a two dimensional algebra over the reals to a result of two units is a unit. Along these lines, the
three dimensional algebra. Hamilton, who presented set U(A) of all units in A will be a gathering under
the possibility of a vector space, discovered multiplication. (U(A) is additionally usually indicated

Priyanka*
454
 Journal of Advances and Scholarly Researches in Allied Education
Vol. 16, Issue No. 4, March-2019, ISSN 2230-7540

A*.) If each nonzero component of A will be a unit, at personality does not concur with the
that point An is known as a division ring (likewise a character of the overring.
skew field.) A commutative division ring is known as
a field.
A function where An and B are rings is
known as a homomorphism of rings in the event that
Examples:
it is a homomorphism of additive gatherings, it jam
1. Z is a commutative ring. items: for every one of the
lastly it protects the character:
2. The gathering turns into a
commutative ring where multiplication will be Examples: The canonical epimorphism is
multiplication mod n. comprises of a ring homomorphism. Be that as it may, the
all cosets where I is moderately consideration of in as
prime to n. recommended in example 3) above isn't a ring
homomorphism.
3. Give F a chance to be a field, e.g., F = R or
A subset an is known as a left perfect of An on the
C. Give a chance to denote the
off chance that it is an additive subgroup and in
arrangement of n by n matrices with
passages in F. Include matrices by including addition at whatever point and
comparing sections. Increase matrices by If we require rather that then a
the typical guideline for grid multiplication.
is known as a correct perfect. At last, is known
The outcome is a non-commutative ring.
as a two-sided perfect in the event that it is both a
= the gathering of left perfect and a correct perfect. Obviously, for a
invertible n by n matrices. commutative ring every one of these ideas are the
equivalent.
4. Give M a chance to be any abelian
gathering, and let End(M) indicate the BASIC NOTIONS
arrangement of endomorphisms of M into
itself. For, characterize A ring is characterized as a non-void set R with two
addition by and organizations with the properties:
characterize multiplication as creation of
functions. (Note: If M were not abelian we (I) is an abelian group (zero
could in any case characterize structure in component 0);
light of the fact that the organization of two
endomorphisms is an endomorphism. Be
that as it may, it would not really be valid that (ii) is a semigroup;
the entirety of two endomorphisms would be
an endomorphism. Check this for yourself.) (iii) for every one of the the distributivity
laws are substantial:
In the event that A will be a ring, a subset B of An is
known as a subring on the off chance that it is a
subgroup under addition, shut under multiplication,
and contains the character. (In the event that An or B The ring R is called commutative if is a
does not have a personality, the third necessity commutative semigroup, for example on the off
would be dropped.)
chance that for every one of the
in the event that the piece isn't really affiliated we
Examples:
will discuss a non-cooperative ring.

1) does not have any legitimate subrings. A component is a left unit if for
2) The arrangement of every single slanting every one of the Similarly a right unit is
characterized. A component which is both a left
grid is a subring of
and right unit is called a unit (likewise solidarity,
character) of R.
3) The arrangement of all n by n matrices
which are zero in the last line and the last
www.ignited.in

In the continuation R will dependably signify a ring.

segment is shut under addition and
In this area we won't by and large interest the
multiplication, and in truth it is a ring in its
own right (isomorphic to However, presence of a unit in R however accept
it's anything but a subring since its

Priyanka* 455
 A Research on Ring Theory and Its Basic Applications: Fundamental Concept

The image 0 will likewise mean the subset 1. (this is thus a group
homomorphism)
RINGS, IDEALS AND HOMOMORPHISMS
2.
Definition 1. A ring R is an abelian bunch with a
multiplication task which is affiliated, and 3.
fulfills the distributive laws
for a,b G R is called ring homomorphism.

The thought of "perfect number" was presented by

with character component 1. the mathematician Kum-mer, similar to some
exceptional "numbers" (well, these days we call them
There is a gathering structure with the addition task, gatherings) having the property of remarkable
however not really with the multiplication activity. In factorization, notwithstanding when considered over
this manner a component of a ring could conceivably more broad rings than (a touch of algebraic
be invertible as for the multiplication task. Here is the number theory would be great to make this
wording utilized. increasingly exact). Today just the name "perfect" is
left, and here is the thing that it gives in current
Definition 2. Let a,6 be in a ring R. On the off chance phrasing:
that and however at that
point we state that an and b are zero divisors. On the Definition 8. Give a chance to be a subset of a
off chance that , we say that ring R. At that point an additive subgroup of R
a will be a unit or that an is invertible. having the property that

While the addition activity is commutative, it might or

not be the situation with the multiplication task.
is known as a left perfect of R. On the off chance
Definition 3. Give R a chance to ring. In the event
that for any a, b in R, at that point R is said that rather we have
to be commutative.
we state that we have a correct perfect of R. On
Here are the definitions of two specific sorts of rings the off chance that a perfect happens to be both a
where the multipli-cation activity carries on well. privilege and a left perfect, at that point we
consider it a two-sided perfect of #, or essentially a
Definition 4. A basic space is a commutative ring with perfect of R.
no zero divisor. A division ring or skew field is a ring
in which each non-zero component a has an inverse Obviously, for any ring #, both R and are
ideals. We hence acquaint some wording with
exact whether we think about these two paltry
Give us a chance to give two additional definitions ideals.
and afterward we will talk about a few examples.
Definition 9. We state that a perfect of R is
Definition 5. The normal for a ring R, indicated by legitimate if We state that is it non-
char#, is the small¬est positive whole number with
the end goal that unimportant if and

On the off chance that is a ring

homomorphism, we characterize the part of in
the most normal way:

We can likewise extricate littler rings from a given

ring.
Since a ring homomorphism is specifically a
Definition 6. A subring of a ring R is a subset 5 of R
gathering homomorphism, we definitely realize that
that frames a ring under the operations of addition
www.ignited.in

and multiplication characterized in R. is injective if and just if It is simple

to watch that is a legitimate two-sided
Definition 7. Let R.S be two rings. A guide perfect:
fulfilling
• is an additive subgroup of R.

Priyanka*
456
 Journal of Advances and Scholarly Researches in Allied Education
Vol. 16, Issue No. 4, March-2019, ISSN 2230-7540

• Take and Then Note that we need the assumption that is a proper
ideal of R to claim that contains both an identity
and a zero element (if then has only one
and
element).
appearing and ar are in
Example. Consider the ring of matrices
• Then has to be proper (that is,
where denotes the integers modulo 2.
), since by definition.
and is such that mod 2. This is thus the
ring of 2 x 2 matrices with coefficients in
QUOTIENT RINGS

Let be a proper two-sided ideal of R. Since is

an additive subgroup of R by definition, it makes Let be the subset of matrices with coefficients
taking values 0 and only.
sense to speak of cosets of ,
Furthermore, a ring has a structure of abelian group
for addition, so satisfies the definition of a normal It is a two-sided ideal of Indeed, take a
subgroup. From group theory, we thus know that it matrix , a matrix , and
makes sense to speak of the quotient group compute UM and MU. An immediate computation
group which is actually abelian shows that all coefficients are of the form
(inherited from R being an abelian group for the with , that is all coefficients are in
addition).
. Clearly is an additive group.
We now endow with a multiplication operation We then have a quotient ring
as follows. Define

We have seen that Ker/ is a proper ideal

Let us make sure that this is well-defined, namely when / is a ring homomorphism.
that it does not depend on the choice of the
representative in each coset. Suppose that We now prove the converse.

Proposition. Every proper ideal is the kernel of a

ring homomorphism.
so that and Now
Proof. Consider the canonical projection 7r that we
know from group theory. Namely

since ab.as and rb belongs to using that We already know that is group homomorphism,
and the definition of ideal. and that its kernel is . We are only left to prove
that is a ring homomorphism:
This tells us is also in the coset and
thus multiplication does not depend on the choice of
representatives. Note though that this is true only •
because we assumed a two-sided ideal , otherwise
we could not have concluded, since we had to
• which is indeed the
deduce that both as and rb are in .
identity element of
Definition 2.10. The set of cosets of the two-sided
ideal given by RING THEORY IN THE SEGMENTATION OF
DIGITAL IMAGES
www.ignited.in

Numerous systems and algorithms have been

proposed for digital picture segmentation.
is a ring with identity and zero element Customary segmentation, for example,
called a quotient ring. thresholding, histograms or other traditional
operations are inflexible strategies. Robotization of
these classical approximations is troublesome

Priyanka* 457
 A Research on Ring Theory and Its Basic Applications: Fundamental Concept

because of the unpredictability fit as a fiddle and component was utilized such a great amount
changeability inside every individual article in the to the hypothetical proofs just as down to
picture. earth viewpoints.

The mean move is a non-parametric technique that • Explanation of solid identical images by
has exhibited to be a very adaptable device for utilizing histograms.
highlight investigation. It can give dependable
answers for some PC vision assignments. Mean • Definition of identicalness classes.
move technique was proposed in 1975 by Fukunaga
and Hostetler. It was to a great extent overlooked • Quotient space. Definition and presence.
until Cheng's paper retook enthusiasm on it.
Segmentation by methods for the Mean Shift Method • Natural Entropy Distance (NED) definition.
does as an initial step a smoothing channel before
segmentation is performed. • Configuration of the algorithm MSHi with the
NED separate.
Entropy is a basic function in data theory and this
has had a unique uses for images information, e.g., DOMAINS
restoring images, recognizing shapes, fragmenting
images and numerous different applications. In any A ring An is known as a space on the off chance that
case, in the field of images the scope of properties of
it is commutative and for , xy=0 suggests
this function could be expanded if the images are
x = 0 or y = 0. (In the event that xy = 0 without x or
characterized in rings. The incorporation of the y = 0, at that point x and y are called zero divisors.)
ring theory to the spatial examination is
accomplished considering images as a grid in which Examples:
the components have a place with the cyclic ring .
From this perspective, the images present patterned 1. Any field is obviously an area.
properties related to dim dimension esteems.
2. Z is an area.
Ring Theory has been well-utilized in cryptography
and numerous others PC vision errands. The 3. The arrangement of every single complex
consideration of ring theory to the spatial
number of the structure a + bi with
examination of digital images, it is accomplished
is an area since it is a subring of the field
considering the picture like a grid in which the
C. This ring is known as the ring of
components have a place with limited cyclic ring Gaussian whole numbers and it is
The ring theory for the Mean Shift Iterative Algorithm
indicated
was utilized by characterizing images in a ring .A
great execution of this algorithm was accomplished.
4. Note that Mn(F) has heaps of zero divisors.
Consequently, the utilization of the ring theory could
(Obviously, it is additionally not
be a decent structure when one want to look at
commutative.) Any immediate result of
images, because of that the digital images present
rings will likewise have bunches of zero
recurrent properties related with the pixel esteems.
divisors: duplicate components non-zero in
This property will permit to increment or to lessen the
various segments.
distinction among pixels esteems, and will make
conceivable to discover the edges in the broke down
Unmistakably, any subring of a field is a space. On
images.
the other hand, any space can be imbedded as a
subring of a field as pursues. Give E a chance to
In this paper, another similitude record among
images is characterized, and some intriguing be the arrangement of sets (a, b) where
properties dependent on this list are proposed. We and Define a connection on E by (a, b)
think about additionally the flimsiness of the iterative (c, d) if and just if advertisement = bc. It isn't
mean move algorithm (MSHi) by utilizing this new hard to watch this is a proportionality connection.
ceasing basis. Moreover, we make an expansion, (For example, (a, b) (c.d) and (c, d) (e,f)
and we extend the hypothetical angles by studying advertisement = bc and cf = de adf = bcf
inside and out the repeating properties of rings
connected to images. For this reason, a few issues = bde d.(af — be) = 0 af = be (a, b)
are called attention to beneath: (e, f). Note the contention utilizes both the way
that An is commutative and that it is an area.) Let Q
www.ignited.in

• Revision of the mean move theory. indicate the arrangement of proportionality classes
of this connection. Indicate the identicalness class
• Important components of the ring of (a, b) by a/b. Characterize operations on Q by

are given: nonpartisan,

unitary, and inverse. Specifically, the inverse

Priyanka*
458
 Journal of Advances and Scholarly Researches in Allied Education
Vol. 16, Issue No. 4, March-2019, ISSN 2230-7540

what's more, At last, if the graph drives, I. e. at that

point h is unmistakably a similar homomorphism as
characterized previously. Henceforth, the
isomorphism h is one of a kind given that the above
graph drives.
A few dull however routine contentions demonstrate
that these operations are all around characterized We consider such a field P (all the more effectively,
(i.e., the outcomes depend just on the equality the monomorphism j) a quotient field or field of
classes of the operands), and that with these divisions of An, and it is one of a kind up to special
operations is a ring. The 0 component is 0/1 (= 0/d isomorphism in the sense portrayed previously. As
for any in A), and the personality is 1/1 (= d/d referenced before, we can in certainty expect j is a
for each nonzero .) Every nonzero component real consideration.
of is a unit; actually (a/b)(b/a) = 1/1 for any
nonzero an and b in A. Thus, is a field. One can sum up the above development by
considering just combines (a, s) where s is
Characterize by It is confined to any proper subset of A. For example,
the field of portions of Z is the field of sound
anything but difficult to see that is a ring
numbers. In any case, we should seriously mull
homomorphism. It is in actuality a monomorphism.
over the subring of of all portions with
For, Hence, Im denominators generally prime to some fixed whole
is a ring isomorphic to A. Besides, every nonzero number. These structure a ring called a
component a/b can be composed confinement. The idea of limitation is critical in
algebra, and we will come back to it later.
as a quotient in of
components in Im i.
CONCLUSION
The above development inserts a ring isomorphic to
An out of a field—which isn't actually what was Ring theory is commonly seen as a subject in Pure
guaranteed. Be that as it may, it is anything but Mathematics. This implies it is a subject of natural
difficult to utilize this development to imbed An itself magnificence. In any case, the possibility of a ring
is fundamental to the point that it is additionally
in a field. Specifically, let be the association of An
crucial in numerous utilizations of Mathematics.
and the supplement of in . Define operations Without a doubt it is fundamental to the point that a
on in the conspicuous way. That is, when an lot of other essential apparatuses of Applied
operand or the consequence of a task in happens Mathematics are worked from it. For example, the
to be in , simply utilize the relating component of vital idea of linearity, and straight algebra, which is
A rather, will at that point be a field isomorphic to a down to earth need in Physics, Chemistry,
and it will contain A. Biology, Finance, Economics, Engineering, etc, is
based on the thought of a vector space, which is a
It is more to the point, notwithstanding, to consider unique sort of ring module. Ring theory seems to
when all is said in done ring monomorphisms have been among the most loved subjects of the
absolute most compelling Scientists of the
where P is a field with the end goal that
twentieth century, for example, Emmy Noether; and
each component of P can be composed for Alfred Goldie. In any case, maybe more essential
in A. We have showed the presence of one than any of these focuses is that ring theory is a
such monomorphism. On the off chance that center piece of the subject of Algebra, which
and are two such then it is frames the language inside which present day
anything but difficult to see that Science can be put on its firmest conceivable
balance.
characterized by is very much
characterized and a ring isomorphism. Also, it makes
the graph beneath drive REFERENCES

1. Birkhoff, G. and Mac Lane, S. (1996). A

Survey of Modern Algebra, 5th ed. New
York: Macmillian

2. Bronshtein, I. N. and Semendyayev, K. A.

(2004). Handbook of Mathematics, 4th ed.
www.ignited.in

New York: Springer-Verlag, 2004. ISBN 3-

540-43491-7

3. D. Comaniciu, P. Meer (1974). ―Mean Shift:

A Robust Approach toward Feature Space

Priyanka* 459
 A Research on Ring Theory and Its Basic Applications: Fundamental Concept

Analysis‖, IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis 15. Wisbauer,R. (2002). Local-global results for
and Machine Intelligence Ph. D. Thesis, New modules over algebras and Azumaya rings,
York University, 24 (5). J.Algebra 135, pp. 440–455.

4. D. Dominguez and R. Rodriguez (2011). 16. Wisbauer, R. (2004). On modules with the
―Convergence of the Mean Shift using the Kulikov property and pure semisimple
Infinity Norm in Image Segmentation‖, modules and rings, J.Pure Appl.Algebra 70,
International Journal of Pattern Recognition pp. 315-320.
Research, 1, pp. 3-4.
17. Wisbauer,R. (2001). Semisimple and pure
5. D. I. Comaniciu (2000). ―Nonparametric semisimple functor rings, Comm.Algebra 18,
Robust Method for Computer Vision‖, Ph. D. pp. 2343-2354.
Thesis, Rutgers, The State University of New
Jersey. 18. Wright, M.H. (2005). Certain uniform
modules over serial rings are uniserial,
6. Faith, Carl (1999). Rings and things and a Comm.Algebra 17, pp. 441-469.
fine array of twentieth century associative
algebra. Mathematical Surveys and
Monographs, 65. American Mathematical
Society, Providence, RI, 1999. xxxiv+422 pp. Corresponding Author
ISBN 0-8218-0993-8
Priyanka*
7. Huynh, D.V., Wisbauer, R. (2000). A
characterization of locally artinian modules, Assistant Professor of Mathematics, CRM JAT
J.Algebra 132, pp. 287-293. College, Hisar

8. K. Fukunaga and L. D. Hostetler (1975). [email protected]

―The Estimation of the Gradient of a Density
Function‖, IEEE Trans. on Information
Theory, IT-21(1) pp. 32-40.

9. Lang, Serge (2002). Algebra, Graduate

Texts in Mathematics, 211 (Revised third
ed.), New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-
0-387-95385-4, MR1878556

10. Lang, Serge (2005). Undergraduate Algebra

(3rd ed.), Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag,
ISBN 978-0-387-22025-3.

11. Pinter-Lucke, James (2007). "Commutativity

conditions for rings: 1950–2005",
Expositiones Mathematicae 25 (2): pp. 165–
174, doi:10.1016/j.exmath.2006.07.001,
ISSN 0723-0869

12. R. Rodriguez, E. Torres, and J. H. Sossa

(2011). ―Image Segmentation based on an
Iterative Computation of the Mean Shift
Filtering for different values of window sizes‖,
International Journal of Imaging and
Robotics, 6, pp. 1-19.

13. S. Luthar and I. B. S. Passi (2004). Algebra,

Vol. 1-4, Narosa, 1997-2004.

14. T. Grenier, C. Revol-Muller, F. Davignon,

www.ignited.in

and G. Gimenez (2006). ―Hybrid Approach

for Multiparametric Mean Shift Filtering‖,
IEEE Image Processing, International
Conference, Atlanta, GA, 17(8) pp. 8-11.

Priyanka*
460