Aereon Aereon III Dynairships
Aereon Aereon III Dynairships
Aereon Aereon III Dynairships
1. Introduction
Aereon Corporation designed and built the Aereon III hybrid airship.
They also developed and patented designs for a family of semi-
buoyant and heavier-than-air lifting body aircraft collectively known as
Dynairships. The small Aereon 7 and Aereon 26 heavier-than-air
aircraft were sub-scale aerodynamic demonstrators for the lifting
body design planned for much larger Dynairships. We’ll take a look
at Aereon III and several Dynairships in this article.
The official Aereon Corporation website went offline in 2016, but has
been archived at the following link: http://aereoncorp.com
1
Aereon III plan & elevation views.
Source, both diagrams: Patent US3180590A
2
Aereon III under construction showing its geodesic rigid frame.
John R. Fitzpatrick, the project’s Chief Engineer is shown in the
two-person cockpit in the central fuselage.
Source, both photos: Popular Science, November 1962
3
Popular Science (Nov. 1962) reported that, like Solomon Andrews'
triple-hull Aereon I, Aereon III was designed for variable buoyancy
propulsion without using its propulsion engine. It was expected to be
capable of generating forward speed and porpoising through the air
by alternately adjusting buoyancy and pitch between positive
buoyancy / positive pitch and negative buoyancy / negative pitch.
The Aereon III’s mooring mast was the telescoping front landing gear,
which can be seen in the following figures. The long strut extends
into the center hull, where loads are distributed to airship structures.
Aereon III was constructed between 1959 and 1965 at the Mercer
County Airport near Trenton, NJ. While preparing for its first flight,
Aereon III was badly damaged during taxi tests in 1966 when it was
caught by a sudden gust of wind during a sharp turn. The fragile,
lightweight Aereon III was flipped over onto its back and then flipped
again onto its undercarriage. The damaged airship never flew.
Initial repair efforts were redirected toward reconstruction into a new,
larger, metal-clad, partially delta-shaped configuration known as the
Aereon IIIB, which measured 100 ft (30.4 m) in length with a span of
4
75 ft (22.8 m). This work was discontinued as Aereon focused on its
more advanced and more capable Dynairship designs. Aereon III
finally was dismantled sometime in 1967.
5
Aereon III at Mercer County Airport, Trenton, NJ, 1964.
Note the 21-foot (6.4-meter) diameter, two-bladed helicopter rotor
used as a propeller. Persons in the photo are C.A. Beck, J.R.
Fitzpatrick, and M. Drew, Jr. (L to R),
Source: “The Dynairship,” by William McElwee Miller, Jr.
6
3. The Dynairship freighter patent (1967 to 1969)
• The hull (2) is a low aspect ratio blended delta wing with vertical
stabilizers that form endplates (10 & 12) on the wings.
• The craft is semi-buoyant; the large delta wing contains inflated
helium lifting gas cells.
• The cargo compartment (94) and cargo rails (96) are sealed
from the helium volume and are suspended within the hull by a
web of steel support cables that distribute the concentrated
load of the cargo compartment over the large area of the upper
shell of the fuselage.
• Cargo is carried in containers suspended from the cargo rails.
• Propulsion system (28) is mounted along the wing trailing edge.
• A Dynairship can taxi like a fixed-wing airplane.
7
Dynairship overhead plan view. Source: Patent 3,486,719
8
Dynairship cross-section views; transverse (top) and profile (bottom).
Source: Patent 3,486,719
Because of its relatively light weight for its size, care had to be taken
to ensure that a Dynairship was not upset by the wind. Examples of
unique operating provisions described in the patent are:
9
which permit takeoff and landing with the aircraft centerline
aligned to the wind and not the runway.
• The aircraft may become too light for safe ground operation in
windy conditions. The ship needed to be kept partly ballasted
by fuel or cargo, or both, particularly when winds were severe.
• A Dynairship could fly when pressurized by air instead of
helium, although cargo-carrying capacity would be reduced.
10
The Aereon 340 was trimmed to be aerostatically slightly heavier-
than-air prior to takeoff. This would have enabled the Aereon 340 to
taxi, takeoff and land from an airport like a conventional airplane.
11
Aereon Dynairship (likely a 340) on the cover of a
Soviet magazine, Technology Youth, August 1975.
Source: Naval Airship Association, Noon Balloon, Spring 2013
12
5. The Aereon sub-scale Dynairship remote controlled flying
models (1968 to mid-1970s)
The proof-of-concept aircraft for the Dynairship was the piloted sub-
scale Aereon 26, which lacked lifting gas and operated as a heavier-
than-air craft throughout its test program to further validate the
aerodynamics of the Dynairship. The basic design of the Aereon 26
is described in US Patent 3,684,217 A, “Aircraft,” which was filed on
30 September 1970 and granted 15 August 1972. The patent
abstract describes the aircraft as follows:
13
Aereon 26 general configuration. Source: US Patent 3,684,217A
14
The Aereon 26’s structure was composed of welded aluminum tubes
(some salvaged from the wrecked Aereon III), covered with aircraft
cloth and aluminum sheet. After completion, the aircraft was
transported by road to the National Aviation Facilities Experimental
Center (NAFEC) near Atlantic City for flight testing.
15
The Aereon 26 made its first flight, piloted by John Olcott, at NAFEC
on 7 September 1970, but proved to be underpowered and was
unable to climb out of ground effect. After a series of modification
and brief test flights of new propellers and vortex generators added to
the aerobody, testing resumed at NAFEC on 1 March 1971. The
aircraft was able to fly and maneuver successfully on several flights
before the limited operating life of its used engine expired, ending the
test program.
John McPhee recounted the story of the test program by in his book
“The Deltoid Pumpkin Seed” (ISBN 0-374-51635-9).
16
Aereon 26 in flight.
Source: Paper “The Dynairship”, William McElwee Miller, Jr.
17
Aereon 26 stored in a hanger for 40 years.
William McElwee Miller, Jr. (r) in June 2011. Source: Hal Brown via
https://searey.us/splash/?Photos&p=SZP1D0000
18
Aereon 26 being moved to the Air Victory Museum at the
South Jersey Airport in Lumberton, NJ
19
Aereon 26 on display at the Air Victory Museum at the
South Jersey Airport in Lumberton, NJ
20
7. Further evolution of the large Dynairship
The Aereon 340 was just the first of the large Dynairship design
concepts. The design continued to evolve into the 1990s.
21
• A "medium-size cargo aircraft" smaller than the Aereon 340
o Length: 200 feet (61 m)
o Gross weight: 270 tons (245 metric tons)
o Cargo capacity: 90 tons (81.6 metric tons)
o Cruise speed: 150 mph (241 kph)
o Range: 1,000 miles (1,609 km)
• A "small patrol aircraft"
o Length: 50 feet (15 m)
o Gross weight: 4,000 pounds (1,800 kg)
o Crew: three persons
o Cruise speed: 50 mph (80 kph)
o Endurance: eight hour missions
22
Artist’s concept of large Navy Dynairships patrolling
in the Arctic. Source: Aereon Corporation
23
Jetflap installations on representative Dynairship lifting body
fuselage shapes. Source: Patent US 4,149,688A
24
8. Heavier-than-air Dynairships
Versions of the Dynairship that, like the Aereon 26, lacked lifting gas
and operated as heavier-than-air aircraft at all times, were proposed
by Aereon Corporation. Following are two Aereon patents for heavier-
than-air large Dynairships configured as radar surveillance platforms.
None were built.
25
Patent US 5,034,751, “Airborne surveillance platform,”
26
9. Dynairship II – the final designs by Aereon
The firm ceased operation in the mid 2000s, primarily due to the lack
of external funding.
27
• John McPhee, “The Deltoid Pumpkinseed,” Farrar, Straus and
Giroux, New York, ISBN-13: 978-0374137816, 9 July 1963
(also available in Kindle)
• “Aereon Dynairship Aircraft Projects (USA),” TopWar, 2
October 2019: https://en.topwar.ru/163086-proekty-letatelnyh-
apparatov-aereon-dynairship-ssha.html
• Other Aereon patents:
• Patent US5931411A, “Hovering aircraft,” filed 16 December
1997, granted 3 August 1999:
https://patents.google.com/patent/US5931411A/en?oq=5931
411
• Patent US6179248B1, “Aircraft,” filed 4 November 1999,
granted 30 January 2001:
https://patents.google.com/patent/US6179248B1/en?oq=617
9248
• Patent US2010/0252674A1, “Reducing runway requirement
for aircraft,” filed 16 January 2007, granted 16 August 2011:
https://patents.google.com/patent/US20100252674A1/en?oq
=20100252674
• Patent US7997528B2, “Reducing runway requirement for
aircraft,” filed 16 January 2007, granted 16 August 2011:
https://patents.google.com/patent/US7997528B2/en?oq=US
7997528B2
28