09 - Chapter 2

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 38

CHAPTER 2

NARCO-ANALYSIS, POLYGRAPH AND


BRAIN-MAPPING: A GLIMPSE

The object of criminal law is in terms of order- survival, security, maintenance of


conditions which permit the society to progress, experience of higher values and finally
the good life which subsumes all the ideals of the world; in which a democratic society
moves.

Justice Hall

2.1 INTRODUCTION

Justice is the basis of law. Speaking particularly about criminal law, it contains a
set of rules for the maintenance of social order in society where change is constant1.
Whether one examines the legal socialization process, the judicial process or the
criminal justice process, the concerns about justice pervades in all these areas 2. In a
democratic country like India, the system of governance is based on the concept of
‘Rule of Law’ i.e. law is the supreme authority, all are equal before law and justice is to
be achieved through it3. In the words of Justice S.R. Bannurmath, “The ultimate aim of
criminal law is protection of right to personal liberty against invasions by others,
protection of weak against strong, law abiding against law-less, peaceful against
violent.” It would be correct to say that the human beings’ right to life and security has
to be respected and protected otherwise it would defeat the very core of Rule of Law
and would give rise to the ‘Law of Fishes’, the strong will swallow the weak.

Of all the branches of law governs every aspect of a man in a civilized society
still criminal law is one that specific branch that has contact with an individual in his
everyday routine. Yet the position of Indian criminal law is not satisfactory 4. The basis

1
Joel. B. Grossman and Richard. S. Wells, “Constitutional Law and Judicial Policy Making”, New
York: John Wiley and Sons, 1972, pp 14-16.
2
June Louin Tapp, edited by Bruce Dennis Sales, “Psychology in the Legal Process”, New York:
Spectrum Publications, 1977, p11.
3
C. K. Takwani, “Lectures on Administrative Law”, Lucknow: Eastern Book Company, 3rd edition,
2001, pp 16-21.
4
Peter Bret, “An Inquiry into Criminal Guilt”, Australia: The Law Book Co., 1963, p1.

30
of Indian criminal justice system is the investigation by the police. When an offence is
brought to the note of police, it is their responsibility to investigate into the matter to
find out who committed the crime, to ascertain the facts and circumstances, to collect
and present whole set of these to the court to find the accused guilty or not 5. It is the
duty of the police to apprehend the wrongdoer and present the case before the court of
justice to meet the ends of justice. But this seldom happens in present scenario. The
reason behind this is criminals have become classy, sophisticated, hi-fi and are simply
cutting-edge as they are adopting new and enhanced techniques for commission of
crimes. They hardly leave any sort of inkling or evidence at the crime site or otherwise
and on the contrary country’s police and investigation agencies are still stuck on the
longstanding tools, techniques for investigation of crimes. Police often use third-degree
torture to extract information. In many cases they try to suppress the truth and make out
fabricated cases for many reasons as political influences or corruption to name a few.
Consequently, custodial atrocities, custodial deaths are on an increase with leaps and
bounds and all this is nothing but a big blow on the ‘Rule of Law’. Also, where
criminals leave no evidence of their alleged crimes, they escape punishments in the
absence of direct proof sufficient enough to establish the guilt. Moreover, where victims
turn hostile there is no way left for the judiciary except to give accused benefit of doubt
and set him free which results in emboldenment of criminals and loss of faith in
criminal justice system of victim, victim’s family and society at large.

Getting released on bail is not a big deal these days and thereafter accused
persons get release due to above stated reasons. There are abundant cases where
accused walked away freely for the want of evidence and victim who suffered trauma
watched helplessly. It was aptly held by hon’ble Supreme Court in State of Punjab v.
Karnail Singh6, a judge does not preside over a criminal trial to see no innocent man is
punished, but also to see a guilty man does not escape. Both are public duties. But the
question arises what really a trial judge can do? He can only decide the matter based on
the material presented before him. If investigation methods applied are not satisfactory,
if witnesses turn hostile, if there is no evidence available, is the judge presiding over the
5
S.R. Bannurmath, “Narco-analysis, Brain- Mapping- Legal Implications with Reference to Right to
Silence”, unpublished report, Karnataka Section of International Commission of Jurists, 2007, p 2.
6
(2003) 11 SCC 271

31
trial left with any other option except to give accused benefit of doubt as law requires
proof and corroboration beyond reasonable doubt.

The problem of Indian society is that there are many to defend the rights of
accused but none to think about victim. Our criminal justice system is value based
conventional system of justice, but criminals today are wise so we need to modify the
whole system because in recent past, alarming increase in terrorist activities, communal
riots, gang wars and underworld activities have added fuel to the fire and tremendously
affected the behavior and work culture of the police7. The police handle these cases in
their own way and by their own methods. That is to say by resorting to third degree
methods, which a civil society governed by rule of law cannot permit. India has always
postulated that evil could not be eradicated by evil in any respect. Therefore, all this
must be within the legal frame-work8. It is here that we can seek the help of scientific
evidence for effective delivery of justice as it combines both science and the law. We
use a number of scientific techniques like DNA, asphyxia, epiphysis, etc which have
been discussed in the previous chapter. Here, in this chapter, the researcher has
narrowed down the study to the use and admissibility of three specific techniques
namely Narco-Analysis, Polygraph And Brain-Mapping. The cardinal principle in
applying scientific aids to investigation is the rule of fair play, unbiased approach and
openness of mind from collection, evaluation analysis and use of these scientific
evidences both by investigators and forensic experts9.

Forensic science plays a vital role in crime detection. According to Encarta


World Dictionary, meaning of the word forensic, is “crime- solving relating to the
application of science to decide questions arising from crime or litigation”. In present
scenario, forensic science can be said to be an important branch of jurisprudence. It is
potent and powerful weapon in the armory of administration of justice. The operation of
forensic is nothing but application of techniques and tools of basic science for various
analysis of evidence associated with crimes. The scientific examination by forensic
7
Jitendra Mishra, “Custodial Attrocities, Human Rights and Judiciary”, Journal of the Indian Law
Institute, vol.47, 2005, p 510.
8
N. K. Jain, “Custodial Crimes: An Affront to Human Dignity”, Human Rights Year Books, 2000, p
64.
9
R. P. Sharma, “Truth Detecting Techniques Vis-à-vis Physical Evidence”, Karnataka Law Journal,
vol. 4, 2007, p 33.

32
scientists adjoins a missing link and strengthens the weak chain of investigation 10. Now,
when criminals are shrewd enough that they hardly leave any evidence, we need to
bring into picture forensic science. In Som Prakash v. State of Delhi11, Supreme Court
recognized the requirement, the necessity of scientific investigation. Law Commission
also emphasized on the need of training of Police officers in using scientific methods of
investigation.12 Narco-Analysis, Polygraph and Brain-Mapping are revolutionary tools
of forensic science that can prove to be very fruitful in crime investigation.

2.2 NARCO-ANALYSIS: ORIGIN AND MODUS OPERANDI

Narco-analysis has become one of the most popular techniques of crime


detection in India. It is a kind of psychotherapy which is conducted on a person by
inducing by bringing that individual into semi-sleep with the help of scientific drugs.
Human beings have the tendency of speaking lies from the time immemorial. A person
is able to lie by using his mind’s eye. In this test, the subject’s self-consciousness is
allowed to sink down by making intrusion to his nervous system. In such a state an
attempt is made to extract information in form of clues about the crime as under the
influence of drugs it becomes extremely difficult for the subject to lie.

It is believed that if a person’s way of thinking can be restrained without any


affect on his memory. He can speak freely without any manipulations under the
influence of drugs Some drugs have been found to create this ‘twilight state” in some
persons13 and with the use of these drugs investigating agencies try to arrive at the truth.

Narco-analysis is a form of psychotherapy and an effective aid to scientific


interrogation. It is a process whereby a subject is put to sleep, or into a state of half
consciousness by means of dosage of scientific drugs and then interrogated while in a
reverie14. The term Narco-analysis is derived from a Greek word “narke” which means
anaesthesia and is used to describe a technique of diagnosing and giving the
psychotherapy with the help of psychotropic drugs as Central Nervous System

10
P. Venkatesh, “Police Diaries: Statements, Reports And Investigations”, Allahabad: Premier
Publishing Company, 2008, p 1096.
11
AIR 1974 SC 983
12
14th Law Commission Report.
13
Joshi, Nayan, “Medical Jurisprudence and Toxicology”, New Delhi:Kamal Publishers,2008.p267
14
Satyendra Kumar Kaul, 429

33
depressants and by virtue of this they produce a wide spectrum of effects 15. There are
two most common drugs used to bring into play the Narco-analysis and these are
Sodium amytal, which is also known as amobarbital or amylobarbition, and Sodium
Pentothal commonly known as thiopental or thiopentone, is used by psychiatrist on the
subject. Its effect is that it makes the subject relaxed and he/she becomes susceptible to
suggestions. The subject becomes communicative and can easily tell the truth. It is said
that after its use the subject loses inhibitions but does not lose his/her self-control and if
he/she does not want to disclose anything he/she may do so. This statement is not
correct. The person actually loses self-control.

2.2.1 HISTORY OF NARCOANALYSIS

Narconalsysis is a test carried out on a patient or suspect when he/she, after


administering barbiturates, comes in a sleep like state, and his/her repressed feelings are
released. It is also called narcosynthesis. As the Webster’s Dictionary states the term
was coined is 20th century and is a combination of two words ‘Narco’ and ‘Analysis’. It
means psychoanalysis in a state which is similar to sleep and this state is achieved b y
use of drugs. These drugs are nicknamed ‘truth drugs’ or ‘truth serum’.

Narcoanalysis is combination of hypnosis and narcosis. The psychiatrist could


collect more details of menial contents in a short period of time. Narcoanalysis produces
sleep without large dosages of sedative drugs. According to Horsley through the use of
post hypnotic suggestions the revealed mental contents could be reintegrated around the
acute event for symptom relief.16

The word Narcoanalysis had its origin in the 20 th century. Horseley coined the
term Narco-analysis which means analysis of the knowledge of the individual in drug
induced condition. Narco-analysis for the first times gained the popularity in the year
1922, when Robert House, who was an obstetrician in Texas used the drug scopolamine

15
Caesar Roy, “Narco Analysis Test- Infringement of Individual Fundamental Rights and Its Value as
Evidence”, Criminal Law Journal, March 2009 p 69.
16
For further reading, refer following:
(1) www.legalserviceindia.com/articles/med000.htm.
(2) www.telegraphindia.com/1070124/asp/atlessure/story_7294907.asp.
(3) www.usiofindia.org/article_Oct_Dec05_7.htm.
(4) www.commerceindia.com/articles/2/2narcoanalysis.html.

34
on two prisoners whose guilt appeared clearly confirm 17. He arranged the interrogation
of two prisoners in the Dallas country jail, with the assistance of drug called
Scopolamine. Under the test both denied the crimes for which they had been detained
and upon trial they were found innocent. Subsequent to the successful experimentation
it was concluded by House that subject cannot lie in sleep like state under the effect of
Scopolamine. It is only after this experiment that the phrase ‘truth serum’ came into
limelight. The term ‘truth serum’ is a name given to hypnotic drugs that induce a person
to speak the truth. The success of this experiment gave Robert House recognition as the
‘Father of Truth Serum’.

A person when in narcotized state of mind reveals the truth and those thoughts
which he/she normally conceals. Thomas De Quirky had done 1804 experiments. With
these experiences he wrote that “opiurn like wine makes the heart expanded and the
person speaks out his/her concealed feelings”. Narcosis can be achieved by using drugs
like cocaine, ether, alcohol, scopolamine, barbiturates, hallucinogens, etc. In 1918, by
sheer chance sodium cyanide was used for narcosis.

In between 1903-1915, investigators used mild type of anesthesia commonly


used in obstetrical practices. For extracting the truth or obtaining confession from
suspects investigators used alcohol as a truth serum which depressed the central nervous
system (CNS) because they believed on time-honoured aphorism in vino veritas which
means “when there is wine there is truth”. The alcohol produces a remarkable candor or
freedom from inhibition and under the influence of this a person looses his/her tongue
and eliminates repressive influences.

About a century ago with the advent of anesthesia it was observed that after
administering drug the patients were prone to make extremely naive remarks about
personal matters which in their normal state would never have been revealed.

In the late 19th century ether, chloroform or hashish were used to induce
person(s) and to deepen the hypnotic effect. In early 20 th century, barbiturates were
administered for psychotherapeutic treatments. These experiments showed that most of
the patients showed uninhibited flow of speech and expressed repressed thoughts and

17
P. Sivananda Reddy, SP, Cyber Crimes, in online Journal of CID visited on October 5,2008

35
feelings. Intimate and private thoughts were revealed under its influence. In
narcoanalysis barbiturate induced state of excitation is created and patient recalls
forgotten and repressed conflicts, events and experiences. These details also help in
treatment of traumatic combat neurosis. In 1931, Italian psychoanalyst for the first time
used mixture of mescaline (a hallucinogenic drug that is extracted from the button
shaped nodules on the stem of the peyote cactus—Bloomsbury’s Concise English
Dictionary, 2nd Edition, p. 906) and Datura seeds for the purposes of psychoanalysis. It
should be remembered that LSD (Lysergic Acid Deithylamide, C 16H16N2O2) was
discovered in 1943 and it was then effectively used for hallucinogenic experiences and
later on this was used for psychotherapy. In 1953, it was observed that a single LSD
application on neurotic patients was effective in abreactive memory activation. It was
also found that by small dosages of hallucinogens useful images could be intensified
and deepened. In 1960, the term “psycholysis” was coined in “Fist European
Symposium for Psychotherapy under LSD-25”. Psycholysis includes psychoanalysis
with activation of unconscious memories, emotional impulses and conflicts with low
dosages of hallucinogens. These experiences were dreamlike but at the same time it was
a clear altered state of consciousness which could be processed.

The procedure adopted is that the patient is kept lying on a bed in a almost darn
and is attended by a trained nurse who talks with the patient and dosages of drug are
injected. The patient is reminded that he/she is under physician’s control and should
surrender to the vision and images which appear before him/her without any
reservation. His/Her remarks during these processes is either tape-recorded or written
and then handed over to patient so that he/she may prepare a retrospective record. After
that a drug free session of interview takes place. In this procedure drug affected
experience has a supporting role. These session continue for several months and even
up to an year. Psycholysis rogation Under Drug Influence is considered best for patients
who were reluctant to use any kind of therapy. In 1960s, psycholysis was used in 18
European centers and more than 7000 patients were treated within a period of 15 years.
In 1965, Alnaes and Grof suggested “a combination of psycholytic and psychedelic
methods” and gave its name as ‘psychedelytic’. It is the most modern concept.

36
W.J. Bleckwenn in 1930 first introduced the use of amytal for treatment of
producing narcosis for neuropsychiatric disorders. According to his definition ‘narcosis’
is a drug-induced state of deep sleep which has similar to general anesthesia but was not
so profound. The patients of Bleckwenn were exited for long periods and were
susceptible to physical exhaustion which might pose the threat of pneumonia or cardiac
arrest, hence it was necessary to produce narcosis in them. Other drugs and agents were
not that much effective as amytal which produced rest and sleep in the hyper phase of
frenzied depressive psychosis, in agitated depression with insomnia and in excited
schizophrenic catatonia. He found that intravenous amytal could produce regular natural
cogent period with unplanned verbal communication. The drug effect produced mild
stimulation, allaying of fear, relaxation of tension and release of inhibition.

In 1932, Erich Lindermann tested his hypothesis that “sleep could not be the
only healing factor in psychiatric patients18”. He gave such dosages of amytal to his
patients which were less than the dosages for producing the sleep. He found that a
desire to communicate, a willingness to speak about very personal problems, an
anticipation of future pleasant activities, and feelings of relief and freedom developed in
normal individuals. Catatonic and depressed patients become warm and friendly.
Previously hidden abnormal thoughts became evident. Inspite of these thoughts the
patients enjoyed a feeling of well-being. Amytal made psychiatrists to study thoughts
contents of stuporous patients which were earlier not possible. The drug proved to be a
boon in psychotherapy. The patients were able to discuss the reasons for their fear and
withdrawal from the outside world.

The main research work on amytal was done during World War II. The drug
was used to treat “war neurosis”. In World War II a large number of allied troops were
evacuated from Dunkrik (a port in North-East France) by sea (under constant enemy
fire) and they approached British Hospitals for their treatment. The stress from which
the persons were suffering was described by William Sargant and Eliot Slater by saying,

“It was an accumulation of strains, both physical and mental, of great intensity,
bodily danger, continuous physical exertion, loss of sleep, insufficiency and
18
Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033318278710200, visited on
December 26, 2011

37
irregularity of meals, intermittent but perpetually recurrent bombardment, and
the sight of comrades and civilian refugees being killed around them. The
necessity of continual withdrawal from the enemy and the impossibility of
striking back produced a sense of frustration and contributed to the disastrous
effect on mind.19”

For mild cases, Sargant and Slater found immediate treatment by rest, full diet
and sedation to be effective. More severe cases were treated by continuous narcosis and
the acute hysterical symptoms, which included amnesia, were treated by suggestions
under hypnosis produced directly or by the use of barbiturates.

American physicians Roy Grinker and John Spiegel gave a new term
“narcosynthesis” instead of “narcoanalysis” in 1942. Instead of adopting ‘war neurosis’
they found that acute symptoms were relieved when the repressed material of the
precipitating event was abreacted until the patient could bear the accompanying affect.
Concurrent psychotherapy, aimed at easing the super ego, strengthening the ego and
incorporating the acute trauma into whole personality, showed good results. They laid
the foundation of all subsequent uses of narcosynthesis in U.S.A.

After the World War II was over, the amalyl therapy was used in civilians In
1945, Adams used narcoanalysis in agitated and depressed patients. Freed used
narcosynthesis to shorten the length of psychotherapy. In 1949, Hoch used
narcosynthesis in patients with gastric ulcers, colitis and tachycardia. In 1947,
O’Halleran used pentothal in chronic alcoholism.

Amytal in combination with sub-shock insulin was also used for treatment of
anorexia nervosa. After 1950, with the development of tranquilizers use of amytal was
reduced. During the American involvement in the Korean and Vietnam Wars soldiers
suffering from “shell shock” were treated at bases near the combat zones by
tranquilizers. Psychotic soldiers could be given 1000 mg of chlorpromazine at the
battle site allowing them to be safely transported to rear bases. Now-a-days besides
amytal hypnotics, narcotics and benzodiazepines are also used for the purpose.

19
Ibid.

38
The dosage of drug varies depending on the suspect’s sex, age, health and
physical and mental condition. Normally, 3 grams of any truth serum is dissolved in
3000 ml of distilled water and then it is injected to the subject intravenously. By this
subject’s imagination is neutralized and he is not in a position to manipulate things but
can only answer specific simple questions.

It is established that 20% of the total individuals subjected for Narco-analysis


are found to be innocent. Therefore, this technique not only helps to identify the real
perpetrators of crime, motive and modus operandi, conspiracies, disfigurement and
displacement of evidentiary items etc. but also to identify the innocents within a short
period of time .

2.2.2 PROCEDURE FOR THE NARCO ANALYSIS TEST

2.2.2.1 Drugs used for the tests are commonly known as Truth Serum. Generally, the
drug called “Barbiturates” or “Sodium Pentothal” is used for conducting narco-
analysis test. It is also known by the name of “Penthol Sodium” or’ Thiopental”
or “Thiopentone”.

2.2.2.2 Important things involved in the tests are:

(i) Video recording

(ii) Tape recorder

(iii) Disposable syringe

(iv) Distilled water

(v) Prescribed truth drug

Every test is video graphed. How the subject was given dosage, what questions
were put to him, what was his response, each and every minute detail is recorded while
conducting the test. Along with the video the whole procedure is also recorded on an
audio tape. Disposable syringe and distilled water is used for the purpose of conducting
the test. The drug which is to be used while conducting test is to be mixed with distilled
water.

39
2.2.2.3 Dosage of Truth Serum

(i) The dose depends upon the suspect’s sex, age, health and physical and mental
condition.

(ii) In normal condition 3gm of Truth drugs of barbiturate class like sodium
pentothal, sodium Amytal etc. is required for the test.

(iii) 3gm of the drug is dissolved in 3000ml of distilled water. When the mixture
(solution) becomes ready it is administered intravenously along with 10% of
dextrose on interval of 3 hours to the suspect accused.

2.2.2.4 Presence of Authorities

At the time of performing test, presence of following person is necessary:

(i) Physician

(ii) Neurologist

(iii) Cardiologist

(iv) Anesthetist

(v) Lawyer

2.2.2.5 Precautions and Guidelines

The following precautions should be taken for fruitful result of test:

(i) The test should be conducted in a well-lit room which is otherwise quiet.

(ii) Prior consent of the subject has to be obtained and the person subjected to the
test should be given an option if he or she wishes to avail the test.

(iii) Consent should be recorded and it should be done before a judicial magistrate.

(iv) The physical and emotional implication along with the legal implications of the
test should be explained to the subject by the lawyer accessing him or her or by
the police that he or she submits himself or herself to the test voluntarily.

40
(v) The person subjected to the test should be made clear during the hearing that his
or her statements so made shall not be a “confessional statement” to the
magistrate but a statement to the police.

(vi) The entire process should be videotaped.

(vii) The drug should be diluted at 8.66% and should be injected showing at intervals
throughout the interview.

(viii) The drug should be administrated so that a state between sleep and wakefulness
is maintained.

(ix) Caffeine should be used to prevent the subject from going into deep sleep.

(x) The interview should not exceed one hour of time;

(xi) The actual recording of test shall be done in the pressure of a lawyer.

(xii) Manner of information received must be completely narrated in full medical and
factual terms and must be recorded;

(xiii) In India the test should be conducted as per norms of the NHRC of India.

(xiv) Narco analysis cannot be conducted without the consent of the subjected and
order of the court.

2.2.2.6 Guidelines for Interrogating the Suspect during Narco Analysis Test

1. The suspect is not given food 5-6 hours before preceding the test and alcohol
containing food and medicine should also be avoided.

2. The suspect must always be attended by the physician/psychiatrist from the time
of injection until the initial narcosis worn off.

3. Careful observation is necessary if properly administered drugs dosages caused


no alarming physiological effect on pulse rate as well as respiratory rate.

4. Larger dosages are too dangerous it may lead to-

(i) Sedative stage

(ii) Unconsciousness with exaggerated reflex (hyperactive stage)

41
(iii) Unconsciousness without reflex even to painful stimuli, and

(iv) Even death

Therefore, Narco analysis test should be performed with great care and caution
and in the supervision of experts. The maximum dose must not exceed 1gm. over a long
period of time. The normal dose is half of above mentioned quantity.

5. If the suspect goes to deep sleep then by the use of anti-narcotics stimulants the
suspect awakes in a minute but feels drowsy and wants to sleep.

6. Emergency resuscitation equipments should remain available because in certain


cases incident of laryngospasm do occur.

7. The quantity of drug depends upon the suspect’s sex, age, health and physical
and mental condition.

8. The interviewee should be aware of the purpose of the drug and should be told
that it is not a truth serum and it would not expose his or her thoughts secrets
and whether he or she states will be confidential and if possible a family
member of suspect should remain present during the test.

9. After intravenous injection of the truth serum the suspect should be involved in
conversation on unconcerned topics.

10. When the suspect’s speech began to slur ask him or her to count the number
backward from 100. When number begins to skip and intervals between the two
speeches become long, questions may be asked.

11. Questions about known items and matters should be asked.

12. Ask the suspect to review some pleasant memories. So that negative materials
may be balanced and meer experiences stored in suspect’s memory can be
revealed.

13. After the procedure ends the suspect should remain on bed rest for about 5
hours.

14. The main objects of the investigation under intravenous administration of truth
drug are to standardize the method of administration; to study the alternations of

42
blood pressure, pulse respiration etc. before and after the administration; to
estimate time required; to reach the various stages of hypno-norcosis; to
estimate duration of deep sleep following narcosis; and to investigate drugs
which would extend the period for Psychiatric investigation.

2.2.3 PROCEDURE TO PERFORM NARCO-ANALYSIS TEST

Narco analysis test is carried out by an expert GABA (A neurotransmitter


inhibitor) is a chemical that occurs naturally in his body. Truth drug binds GABA
forming a complex at the B site which exerts pressure over the permeability of chloride
ions into neutral membrane. Leading to the stage of disinhibition truth drugs cut to
increase the action of GABA in the brain, thereby decreasing nerve activity nerve
activity hi the brain which results in sleepiness.

3 grams of drug is dissolved in 3000ml of distilled water and this mixture along
with 10% of dextrose is injected intravenously to antecubital vein in the body of the
subject over a period of 3 hours with the help of an experienced anesthetist. It is
injected in normal conditions 0.5 to 1 ml per minute till the subject becomes sedative.
The drug depresses central nervous system (CNS) and makes the heart boat slower and
blood pressure also lowers down. When the person’s speech becomes slurred and he or
she behaves in a co-operative manner and also becomes more talkative it may pressure
that he or she is under full control of the patient. The examiner satisfies himself by
testing the subject’s eye-muscles with his fingers. Needle is left in the vein of the
subject as different person need different dosages of the drug and also for continued
narcotic state further administration of drug is necessary. Care is taken that only so
much drug is administered which may keep the subject in semi-awake state and he does
not go in deep sleep rate.In this hypnotic state the questions are asked and answers are
audio and video-recorded.

Use of drug removes the conscious block under which hidden information is
stored. When the block is removed the person becomes comfortable, conversant and
facts free to reveal hidden information without any inhibition. The drug acts as a
catalyst for catharsis. The following effects occur under the influence of truth drugs :

43
(1) After administration of truth drug suspect’s body becomes relaxed, his or her
features slacken and full of excitement and few become silly and giggly.

(2} The drug blocks the impulses that usually pass through certain nerves and most
subjects fall asleep which emerges later in disoriented semi-wakefulness.

(3) Under the influence of truth drugs the suspect, may be he or she, becomes
incapable of telling a lie, and he or she will necessarily share any information
that is asked of them.

2.2.4 USES OF NARCO ANALYSIS TEST

Narco analysis may be used in following purposes—

(1) For Medical purposes—Narco analysis has been used in mental health cases for
diagnosing habiliment. In medical field Narco analysis is used—

(1) for restoring speech to mute persons

(2) in case of amnesia, for reviving memory, and

(3) for expression of suppressed or repressed thought or conflict

(2) In criminal investigation.—Narco analysis is now being used in forensic field also.
According to Dr. S.L. Vaya, Deputy Director of DFS, Gandhi Nagar, Gujarat, “In India,
Narco analysis is a useful and non-invasive asset for investigation and for prevention of
crimes and if used in a scientific way can be very useful for interrogation of Suspect”.

In criminal justice system it is used for investigation purposes. Narco analysis


test should be used only in the cases where large interest of society is involved. Narco
analysis is usually used in cases of terrorism, crimes that are well organised, serial
killings, in cases where no evidence is available etc.

There are two categories of -suspects who undergo Narco analysis test:

1. Where suspect willingly volunteers and co-operates with the interrogator.

2. Where suspect is forced to change the test under court orders.

The advantage of Narco analysis is that this technique is helpful in saving the
innocents from prosecution and eliminating the use of third degree method. In addition,

44
it has been used as a time saving device in criminal cases with the help of Narco
analysis by a trained and skilled psychiatrist.

2.2.5 CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF NARCO ANALYSIS

Narco analysis has been criticized on number of grounds. They are following :

1. This test is not 100% accurate. Sriram Lakshman20 quoted that Dr. B.M. Mohan,
Director of FSL, Bangalore claims that he has data to prove his contention that
Narco analysis has 96 to 97 percent total screens rate. Sriram Lakshman is of
view that Narco analysis should be discredited.

2. Dr. P. Chandra Sekharan, the highly regarded former director of the Forensic
Sciences Department of Tamil Nadu, has characterized the practice as an
unscientific, third degree method of investigation.

3. In Narco analysis by false tricks certain subjects made totally false statements. If
the subject has been a drug addict or alcoholic his or her tolerance level will be
high and he or she may false state of semi-consciousness and can tell lies.

4. It is very difficult to suggest a exact dosage of drug for a particularindividual as


it will vary from person to person depending upon the mental attitude and
physical structure of the subject. It is said that if a wrong dose is administered to
the subject, it may cost his life.

2.3 POLYGRAPH: ORIGIN AND MODUS OPERANDI

Polygraph is another important scientific tool of investigation. Polygraph is


popularly known as lie detector and sometimes referred to as psycho- physiological
detection. It is an instrument which measures and records physiological actions of
human body as for instance blood-pressure of the subject, his pulse rate, respiratory
system, skin conductivity while the subject is asked questions relating to the crime and
he answers them. The polygraph tests measures all the natural changes caused by
autonomic nervous system during questioning. The autonomic nervous system changes
are beyond reasonable control of an individual and hence autonomic nervous system
response changes transpires when the subject tries to tell a lie.
20
Sriram Lakshman, “We need to talk about narco analysis”, the Hindu op-Ed May, 02 2007.

45
Polygraph is a device that records simultaneously tracing of several different
pulsations, as arterial and venous pulse waves, and the apex beat of heart 21. According
to Science and Technology encyclopedia, “Lie Detector” is a device intended to detect
an involuntary physiological response that all persons exhibit when lying but never
when telling the truth.

According to Encyclopedia Britannica, “Lie Detector” is an instrument for


recording physiological phenomena (including blood pressure, pulse rate and
respiration) of a human subject as he or she answers questions asked by an operator.

The polygraph is an instrument that records certain physiological changes in a


person’s body going through the questions in an effort to get hold of the truth or
deception.22 A definition of polygraph has not been found in any Indian Legislation. A
definition of “polygraph” was given in the United States Employee Polygraph
Protection Act of 1988. In this Act, “Polygraph means an instrument that :

“(A) Records continuously visually, permanently and simultaneously as minimum


instrumentation standards; and

(B) Is used, or the results of which are used for the purpose of rendering diagnostic
opinion regarding the honesty or dishonesty of an individual”.23

According to Science and Technology Encyclopedia, “lie-detector” is a device


intended to detect on involuntary physiological response that all persons exhibit when
lying but never when telling the truth.

The principle behind the polygraph technique is that the suspect fears detection
of lie and creates in the subject an emotion of fear which consequently results
physiological changes which are captured by various instruments. Polygraph test is
basically based on the theory that generally a person telling a lie becomes nervous and
shaky. Due to this position physiological changes occur in the person’s body24.

21
Taber’s Medical Dictionary 17th edition, p.1553
22
Bhargava Mitra, “The Lie Detector, its validity as scientific evidence and its legal status in U.S. and
India”, Cr. L.J. (2005) journal p. 185.
23
B.R. Sharma, “Forensic science in criminal investigation and Trials”, 3 rd Edition, Universal Law
Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, 1990, p. 17.
24
Satyendra Kumar Kaul, 578.

46
In polygraph test subject is asked a series of question. These questions are
controlled questions. Some questions are asked generally even though the answers to
them are already known. For instance name and address of the subject. While answering
these questions no change transpires. After this, relevant questions are asked and if the
subject tries to lie physiological changes takes place. Physiological changes may crop
up in shape of increased or decreased blood pressure, change in pulse rate or heartbeats,
sweating, dryness of mouth, etc. These changes are afar from the reasonable and
practical control of subject thus whenever subject tries to lie polygraph machine
apprehends the lie.

In India, since 1974 more than 3000 polygraph tests have been conducted.
Lawyers in general were not aware of this test. It was a tele-serial ‘Sach ka Samna’ that
brought polygraph test in glare of public. Indian Courts never objected to polygraph test
until recently in May 2010 when Supreme Court in case of Smt. Selvi & Ors. V. State of
Karnataka objected to these scientific investigation tools. Before this judgment, some
lower Courts and High Courts have passed orders in favour of scientific tools.

Thus, polygraph test is a technique where normal bodily changes of subject are recorded
and observed while subject is answering the question. These changes occur only if the
subject tries to hide the truth.

2.3.1 UNDERLYING THEORY OF POLYGRAPH

The polygraph works on the principle that change in a person’s perception or


consciously held feelings produces a reaction in the form of physiological changes, e.g.
in the pulse rate, blood pressure, respiration rate and the electrical resistance of the skin
known as G.S.R. when a person is truthful, the body functions within, its normal
patterns with no significant or consistent changes. 25 When a person is not truthful, the
fear of detection and entrapment induces a person to lie, and this causes mental
excitation and an attempt to conceal the excitation, adrenal glands are stimulated to
secrete adrenalin which on entering the blood stream steps up the blood pressure and
rate of pulse and respiration of the individual. All these recordings are collectively

25
Ekta Gupta, “Lie Detector Test –A Global Perspective” Cr. L.J. Aug. (2006) p. 179.

47
known as polygraph, which is evaluated to fine art during the lie detection test. It was
held by the court in Ramchandra Reddy and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra26,

“In this test the polygraph is taken which gives this reaction and an expert would
then explain these reactions in the court which would be his .reading of the
polygraph from which would flow his conclusion which are to be admitted or not
admitted by a Judge on appreciation of the statement and the objections raised
theret”

2.3.2 PROCEDURE TO PERFORM POLYGRAPH

Polygraph test is a series of psychological tests. In this test changes in blood


pressure, pulse rate, respiration, muscle movement, skin conductivity are recorded. An
expert and skilled examining will make assessment of following procedures—

1. as averment of examiner’s emotional state;

2. medical fitness of the examination

3. to identify overly responsive behaviour specialized tests be conducted;

4. to assess responsive capabilities of examination control question be


asked

5. to do factual analysis of case information and

6. to do pre-test interview and detailed preview of questions.

In polygraph there aspects of human physiology are tested, viz -

1. Pneumograph tracing,

2. Electrodumal activity tracing, and

3. Cardiovascular tracing

The first relates to respiration, the second to skin conductance or skin resistence
and the third with blood volume and pulse rate. If a person tries to conceal
physiological changes like increase or decrease in blood volume, increase or decrease in

26
Cr. W.P (c) No. 1924 of 2003

48
heart rate and changes in respiration, perspiration takes place. If the person is truthful,
the organs exhibiting such physiological changes function in normal pattern.

2.3.3 Polygraph Test Stages

Generally polygraph test is conducted in three stages

(i) The pre-test interview

(ii) The chart collection or examination proper or

(iii) The post-test-interview

2.3.3.1 Pre-test Interview

The first stage starts when the examiner introduces himself to the subject and
tells “the subject about the procedure and legal aspects of the test and the consent of the
test is taken and the subject is also told about his legal rights. One subject is made to
believe that the examiner is an expert in the Field and deception will be obvious to the
examiner. The examiner also questions about subject’s medical problems. All these are
written in a form which the subject signs. He is told that no question would be asked
about his political affiliation, religious or social beliefs or sexual activities etc. unless it
is basically related to the matter for which the test is being carried out. Then the
examiner tells about the polygraph technique to the subject and the queries are made
from the subject in detail about the incident for which the test is conducted. Questions
are asked to know “behavioral symptoms” which indicates symptoms of deception.

The pneumograph, the sphygmomanometers and electrode are placed on the


subject during or at the conclusion of pre-test interview and after the interview
concluded the –Sphygmomanometer is inflated and recording of responses begin and
box-line is recorded.

2.3.3.2 Chart collection or examination proper

The second stage is the actual performance of test, i.e., examination proper.
Different gadgets are attached to the body of the subject for measuring the changes in
physiological conditions. A rubber tube is festered around the chest for measuring the
respiratory changes, in the upper arm an inflated cut is wrapped for measuring the

49
change in the blood pressure and pulse rate, and for recording the electrodumal
responses electrodes are attached to the finger tips. The subject is given a comfortable
chair to sit in and the test is conducted in a vacant and calm room with only the
examiner. Questions prepared in advance are put to the subject and he has to reply them
in ‘yes’ or ‘no’. Some questions are irrelevant and some are relevant-One of the
questions is stores provoking question. The measurement of blood pressure,
perspiration, pulse and rate of breathing is recorded during whole of the question
answer series. The examiner then compares responses of stress provoked question with
other question and interprets the court to know whether lie has been spoken. The
instrument records changes by means of a needle on the graph paper.

At the conclusion of pre-test interview and after the interview is conducted the
Sphygmomanometer is inflated on the subject. Then first question is asked. There is a
gap of 10 to 15 seconds between each question so that responses to last question may be
eliminated and physiological response comes closer to baseline. Time (if beginning of
examination, question asked and when examination ends, it is all recorded by examiner
in the chart then subject is asked about his reactions to the questions. It helps in refining
the question. Question is revised and reformed and if necessary classified. The
“stimulation test” is considered out. Stimulation test is designated to convince the
subject about the accuracy of polygraph examination.

The “stimulation” or “stim” test is a number or card test. Our types of questions
are asked to the subject, they are relevant, control, irrelevant and concealed information
or guilty knowledge questions. Main questions are repeated three or four times and to
avoid discomfort to subject pressure cult are inflated only for 10 to .1.2 minutes.

2.3.3.3 Post-test interviews

In the third stage the result of the test is discussed with the subject in order to
analyze about deception of attempted unresponsive to any question.

50
2.3.4 RESULT AFTER POLYGRAPH TESTING

The result of the test is obtained on a chart known as polygram. The following
changes are noted carefully, suppression in respiration and increase of blood pressure
after the reply, decrease in blood pressure, behavior breathing, slowing of pulse rate and
the course of blood pressure.

Polygraph does not directly detect whether the person is speaking truth or is
deceiving but the examiner carefully analyzes the pattern of arousal responses and on
that basis veracity of the individual is inferred. This inference or assessment is called
‘diagnosis’ of truthfulness or deception. In India, since 1974 at Central Forensic Science
Laboratory, New Delhi more than 3000 polygraph tests have been conducted.

2.3.5 CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF POLYGRAPH

(1) The test does not tell as to whether the subject is lying or not. Results only show
about the physiological changes which have to be interpreted by the expert.

(2) In asking the question no science is involved and it wholly depends upon
trickery and on the expertise of the examiner.

(3) A person who can control his emotions to a great extent can still tell a lie, e.g., if
a person has control on himself by practice of yoga or otherwise, this test is
bound to fail.

(4) Nervousness may be exhibited by many innocent and truthful persons under the
conditions of police interrogations. This nervousness may arise due to various
reasons, e.g., fear of being involved in the crime, or the fear that his or her
previous conduct may be shown to the police what is not related to the present
crime. It may also be due to the fact of not properly understanding the procedure
of polygraph, besides there may be fear of wrong interpretation of chart by the
examiner and even the interrogator and examiner may be biased. If the examiner
holds the subject guilty, he may interpret the chart with that bent of mind and
vice versa he may be lenient in interpreting, chart of a person whom he
considers innocent.

51
2.4 BRAIN- MAPPING: ORIGIN AND MODUS OPERANDI

Brain Mapping is one more valuable scientific tool for investigation of crimes.
Brain Mapping is also known as Late Positive Complex or P3 or P300. It is a
component of averaged brain potentials. In this test no questions are asked from the
accused. He is made to sit in evoked potential recording machine and is shown objects
relating to crime scene or is made to hear sounds pertaining to crime site. The sensors
from his head pick the event related potentials in the form of Brain Mapping only if the
person has been at the site of crime. The accuracy of Brain Mapping is almost 100%.

Brain Mapping is a response of the brain to a stimulus which is shown to the


subject. In 1965, scientists were working on the research of Event Related Potentials
and it was discovered by Sutton and his colleagues. It is very robust Event Related
Potential. As soon as it recognizes the stimuli it sends the reaction within 300
milliseconds of seeing the stimuli. If the person is attentive to the stimuli its response
would be the fastest. If more time is taken for making decision the more time is spent
for the responses of P300. Its latency shows the amount taken by it in arriving at a
decision27.

When the brain recognizes a person or a sound, it produces a precise electric


wave which is called P30028. In this test sensors are attached to the head of the subject
and the subject is seated before a computerized monitor. The sensors catch the electrical
activity in the brain and record P300 wave, which is produced only if the subject has
some correlation with the pictures shown to him and the sounds which he is made to
hear.

Brain fingerprinting device was invented by a U.S. scientist Dr. Lawrence A.


Farewell in early 1970’s. He is former faculty of Oxford University. He is the Chief
Scientist and President of the Human Brain Research Laboratory founded by him in
1991. According to him, centre of every activity is brain and it not only plans activities
but orders for its extension. The “Truth Detector” is based on the functions of brain.
Every event is stored in the brain and when the same or similar event is shown to person

27
Satyendra Kumar Kaul,249
28
Bimaldeep Singh, “Scientific Techniques of Obtaining Evidence”, Law Journal of Guru Nanak Dev
University, Vol. XVII p 92.

52
the brain responses and response is recorded through computer. Through Brain
fingerprinting it can only be known that the person was present or not at the place of
occurrence. Only proof of his presence, inferences cannot draw that he has committed
the alleged offence. The person may be present on the place of occurrence for some
legitimate reason, e.g., for saving the victim. He may reach at that place as a .stranger.
The information relating to crime may come into his mind by receiving information
through reading of newspaper or watching of T.V. According to Mr. A.A. Samdani, Ex
Judge and Mr. Sharique Rizvi, Associate Prof. Indian Institute of Information and
Technology, “information present” does not always mean that suspect is guilty. It is
possible that the subject has been a witness to the crime or he or she has already read
details in newspaper or seen in media which has been imprinted in his or her mind.

Processing of known information like elements relating to the crime deposited in


the brains is exposed by identifiable pattern in the Electroencephalogram outline.
“Technically explaining, Brain Mapping involves confrontation with a stimulus of
special significance with electric signal known as P300 emitted from individual’s brain,
beginning approximately 300 million milliseconds after the confrontation. Since it is
based on EEG signals and graphs, the system does not require the subject speak at all
and he in way continues to exercise his right to keep silent. The suspect wears a special
hair band with electronic censor that measure the EEG from several locations on the
scalp.” The subject views on the computerized screen or even directly anything
consisting of words phrases, picture etc29.

Brain has been the centre of attraction of neuro-scientists for decades. The brain
is centrally involved in every human action and records everything that human beings
do, including criminal acts.30 Due to this reason the brain has been the key point in
inventing all equipments of lie detection be it polygraph or lie detection test, p-300 or
Brain fingerprinting and Narco analysis. In these tests Brain fingerprinting is the latest
scientific technique for measuring neural responses exhibited after an object is shown to

29
Deswal, Rajbir. “Supreme Court Ban on Narco test”, The Tribune , 9 May 2010.
30
A.K. Gupta, S. Back & U.B. Roychowdhury, “Probing in the depth of criminal mind”, J. Indian
Acid, Forensic Med, 3013 –http://www.indianjournals.com visited on 18-02-09.

53
the subject or on external stimulus is printed to the subject. It is a branch of neuro-
science and deals with the study of neuroanatomy. 31

Brain fingerprinting is used to determine whether a certain information is


present in the brain of a person or not. In other words, brain fingerprinting is a scientific
test by which guilty knowledge stored in one’s brain can be determined. Brain
fingerprinting measures neural responses to images from crime scene. In short, the brain
fingerprinting is the method of matching the fingerprinting information in the brain with
that of actual crime scene.

2.4.1 PROCEDURE TO PERFORM BRAIN- MAPPING

When any information is given to an individual, which corresponds to prior


knowledge or information in his brain about the activity or event it will emit responses
in the shape of p-300 waves. It has also been possible to observe stimulus response up
to 800 mili seconds. P-300 is an electrically positive component and has a peak literacy
of about 300 to 800 mili seconds at the midline partial area of the head. Dr. Farewell
has been able to test not only the p-300 but also a negative electrical component which
is found at midline frontal area and has an asset latency of 800 to 1200 mili seconds
through MERMER. The familiarity reaction of brain towards the activity or events is
the midline partial area of the head. The familiarity reaction of brain towards the
activity or events is recorded in MERMER (Memory and Encoding Related
Multifaceted Electroenceptalographic response) apparatus. For measuring EEG (Electro
Encephalograph) from several place of scalp a special head band equipped with
electronic sensors, is attached to the scalp and the test is presented with a series of
relevant and irrelevant words, pictures, signs, Bounds etc. and responses of the two
different types of stimuli is measurable to know whether the relevant material is known
to the brain or not. If the brain is confronted with the stimuli, which is already in its
store it will emit p-300 at the rate of 300 mili seconds. Since, those responses are
recorded EEG signals no question has to be answered by the test. The apparatus works
not on emotions but on Cognitive Brain responses. This is a major difference between a
polygraph and brain fingerprinting.

31
Supra 20.

54
2.4.2 ADVANCEMENT OF TECHNIQUE IN INDIA

Dr. Farewell patented his technique of brain mapping in U.S.A. in 70s which
was projected to be as a major breakthrough in Forensic Science as it involves and
formulates probes, i.e., Keywords, or phrases or pictures collected and related to the
crime arc mixed with irrelevant words and pictures and is flashed on screen and the
subject is called to press button on the correct option. But the difficulty arises when the
suspect presses wrong button or does not press any button at all. To meet this error Dr.
Mukundan of Brainex (Brain Experience) Company at Bangalore has designed a special
software called “Brain Electrical Activation Fingerprinting”. It is said to be modi lied
version of Dr. Farewell’s techniques. In this technique the entire crime scene is created
and is shown that the suspect and his or her reactions are recorded. There is another
change sometimes information is gathered from frontal lake of brain and sometimes
from posterior to be sometimes vice versa. However, this technique cannot be used on
mentally ill or heavily alcoholic suspect and may not be helpful in cases of habitual
criminals. But according to Dr. Mukundan. “it is so specific that one can even find out
how much money was paid to a contract killer or what called him up the day before the
killing”.32

2.4.3 WORKING OF BRAIN- MAPPING

Human brain works like a Black Box kept in an aeroplane for recording every
thing happening with the plane. There is an instinctive ability in the brain to identify
person, places, objects etc. and is kept reserved in memory. This technique is used to
determine whether certain information is or is not present in the brain of a person. Few
electrodes are strapped on the scalp of a person and his or her involuntary responses are
recorded through electroencephalogram.33

When any information given to subject corresponds to the information already


stored in brain it sends electronic signals and is recorded in KEG (Electro
Encephalograph). If a person knows an event and it is shown to him the p-300 electrical
brain wave responds to that fact. The MERMER is a mere longer and more complex

32
http://www.the=week.com/24Feb29/caseenterents-articles2.html. visited on June 17,2012.
33
Supra 25 at 295.

55
device than p-300. P-300 shows only a peak electrical response while MERMER shows
both peak and valley. The MERMER not only responds to p-300 electrical waves but
also additional data occurring more than 200 mili seconds after the stimulus.

The brain fingerprinting detects the presence of crime. If a person is not present
at that he has committed the crime or present at the place of commission of crime. The
act of crime is imprinted in the brain of the subject. This test only ensures that the
subject is present at the place of occurrence. However, it does not ensure that the person
concerned has committed that crime. He may be present at that place for any other
purpose.

Brain finger printing is a boon for investigating agencies. In a planned commission


of crime the physical evidences may vanish or made to vanish and sometimes it happens
that no clue of the criminal acts is found. The investigating agencies have to grope in
dark in order to catch a suspect. In such a case, the brain finger printing has prevented
to be a boon in that regard. In commission of crime the brain of the preparer is always
with him while planning, exciting and committing the crime. By this technique it is
measured as to whether there is crime related information stored in the brain of the
suspect or not.

2.4.4 CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF BRAIN MAPPING

1. This test has its own limitations. The test is conducted by a human being and it
is possible that they fail to fully and truthfully analyze the brain wave.

2. An innocent person who has not committed the crime but has only witnesses of
wound also react to the stimuli. Similarly, a person may be aware of the crime
due to details published in media and the brain may store it. In that case also
there chance is that the innocent can also be found guilty. Therefore, this tests
utility is only to imprint the subject’s brain, which makes it clear that the subject
is innocent.

3. This technique is also criticized on the ground that it is violation of brain


privacy. By this a person loses his right to keep his thought to himself.

56
4. This is also not useful in case of a person who loses his memory, e.g., old people
easily lose memory and therefore can brain mapping on an old man accurately
work? Similarly, a person suffering from deficiency in memory can exit normal
p-300 brain waves?

5. The six-member committee headed by National Institute of Mental Health and


Neuro Sciences (NIMHANS) Director Dr. Nagraj34 -concluded that Brain
Mapping is unscientific and should not be used as an tool of investigation and
an evidence adduced through brain mapping should be made inadmissible in
Courts. He also said there is requirement of a methodical, systematic and
meticulous examination of the procedure as it lacks ascertained principles..

2.5 CASE LAWS IN WHICH NARCO-ANALYSIS, POLYGRAPH AND


BRAIN-MAPPING HAS BEEN CONDUCTED

These tests have been conducted in so many cases as for instance, on Godhra
incident accused persons; on Abdul Karim Telgi, prime accused in stamp paper scam; in
Arun Bhatt kidnapping case of Gujarat; on Nithari serial killers of Nithari, Noida (U.P.);
on Selvi Murugesan, a sitting MLA of Tamil Nadu; on Abdul Rehman, Bechu Rehman
and Ijju Sheik; on Mumbai Police inspector Daya Nayak, on Naxalite Mallika; on Abu
Salem a suspect of Bombay blast case; on Actress Preeti Jain, Naresh Pardesi, suspects
of Malegoan blasts; on R. Venkateshwara Rao, prime accused of Krushi Bank scam;
and on Nadeem Kashmiri in a fraud case.These tests were not used in India in the past,
but lately these tests have been applied to so many persons.

2.5.1 Polygraph test conducted in a child swapping case.—In a sensational case of a


child swapping in Hyderabad (AP), the five stagers Government Maternity Hospital
subjected to polygraph tests. The story of case was that a young mother had alleged that
her boy child delivered at the Nayapur Hospital on April 16 had been swapped. She had
been given a girl child which she refused to accept. A DNA test revealed that the girl

34
Raghava M., “Panel: Stop using brain mapping as an investigative tool and evidence”, The Hindu.
Saturday, September 6, 2008.

57
child given to Latha was indeed not hers. The police started investigation into the case.
Following which it was decided that the suspect would be subject to polygraph test. 35

2.5.2 Polygraph test conducted in a rape case.—In Bangalore, Karnataka, one


Pratibha Srikant, a woman employee of BPO was raped and murdered. The charge was
framed on a driver hired by the company. The driver was subjected to polygraph test,
brain mapping test, and narcoanalysis test.36

2.5.3 Polygraph test conducted in Shivani Bhatnagar murder case.—The Indian


Express Journalist Shivani Bhatnagar was murdered at her East Delhi apartment on 23rd
January, 1999. In this case murder charge was framed on a Haryana Cadre I.G. Police
Mr. R.K. Sharma and. five other accused persons. The polygraph tests were conducted
on Shivani’s husband, her sister, brothers and brother-in-law.37

2.5.4 Polygraph test conducted on Nithari’s serial killing accused.— In Nithari,


Noida (U.P.), a businessman Mohinder Singh Pandher and his domestic help Surinder
Koli were accused of murdering 30 missing children. At the time of writing this book,
the CB1 is investigating into the case. In scientific tests suspected killer admitted serial
killing of missing children. In this case the investigating agencies used polygraph, brain
mapping and narcoanalysis tests on both of them and also on a female servant who
allegedly lured children who were killed by both duo. 38

2.5.5 Polygraph test conducted on Mumbai serial killer.—One Ravindra Kantrolle, a


suspect of serial killing of seven people in South Mumbai in Marine Drive and Azad
Maidan Police Station, was subjected to scientific tests like polygraph, narcoanalysis
and higher version of brain mapping tests [i.e., Brain Electrical Oscillation Signature
(BEOS)]. During these tests he confessed his involvement in the crimes. BEOS (brain
mapping) and polygraph tests were conducted at Maharashtra Forensic Science
Laboratory, and narconalysis tests were conducted at Bangalore Forensic Science
Laboratory on 14th February, 2007.39

35
Retrieved from http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com. visited on September 19,2012.
36
Retrieved from http://infotech.indiatimes.com visited on September 21, 2012.
37
Retrieved from http://newswatch.in visited on September 19,2012.
38
Retrieved from www.indlaw.com; www.dnaindia.com. visited on October 8, 2012.
39
Retrieved from www.outlookindia.com. visited on July 9,2013.

58
2.5.6 Polygraph test conducted in a murder case.—A young man was found dead in
a causeway near Kaimbwala village in July 2006. After investigation police came to
know that he was working as a waiter in a hotel. Police arrested five persons in this case
and subjected all of them to polygraph tests, After the tests three of them were detected
‘positive’ which indicated that they were lying during the test. 40

2.5.7 Polygraph test conducted on a film actress Preeti Jain.—In Mumbai, police
arrested Preeti Jain, a film actress, and her associate Arun Gulab Gavali, a mafia don-
turned-politician in a case suspected to kill a film maker Madhur Bhandarkar. In this
case police wanted the polygraph, brain mapping and narcoanalysis tests of accused
including Gavali. The lower Court ordered for these tests. And the Bombay High Court
refused to interfere in lower Court’s order. Then a S.L.P. was filed in Supreme Court
against the order.41

2.5.8 Polygraph test conducted in an abduction case.—In Imphal, a twelve-year-old


girl Lungnila Elizabeth was abducted by unidentified man. After eight days her
decomposed body was found inside a gunny bag at an isolated place. Police arrested
two persons who had admitted their involvement in the crime. Following the public
outcry this case was transferred to C.B.I. The C.B.I, requested the Court to conduct
brain mapping, narcoanalysis and polygraph tests which is under consideration of the
Court.42

2.5.9 Polygraph test conducted on a suspected terrorist.—In Andhra Pradesh,


Gulbarga police arrested Shami Ahmed Shah, a suspected terrorist of an banned outfit
Lashkar-e-Taiyba, He was subjected to polygraph and brain mapping tests. According
to police officers the suspect was questioned about his association with Lasker-e-Taiyba
and its network and activities. After the tests vital and incriminating information
obtained from the suspect.43

2.5.10 Polygraph test conducted in a poetess murder case.—In Lucknow, Uttar


Pradesh, a Former Minister Amarrnani Tripathi was arrested on 21st September, 2003

40
Retrieved from cities.expressindia.com. visited on August 8, 2013.
41
Retrieved from www.indlawnews.com visited on June 15, 2011.
42
Retrieved from www.e-pao.net. visited on November 30, 2011.
43
Retrieved from www.hindu.com.visited on April 30, 2011

59
on the charges of conspiracy of a murder of a poetess Madhumita Shukla. He was
subjected to polygraph tests after he had given his consent to undergo the test at CFSL
of CBI headquarter.44

2.5.11 Polygraph test conducted in an armed attack case.—In Ahmedabad, Gujarat, in


connection with the armed attack at Dantali ashram of Swami Sacchidanand on July 17,
2006 the police subjected to polygraph tests two more office-bearers of the Swadhay
Pariwar at FSL, Surat.45

2.5.12 Polygraph test conducted in arms theft case.—In Muzaffarpur, Bihar, the
disappearance of four AK-47 rifles and an Insas rifle had created an outcry in police
department. In this case the sentries who were guarding the Bihar Military Police
Armoury at Muzzafarpur were subjected to polygraph tests.46

2.5.13 Ijju Sheikh’s case—face-to-face probe.—In the Mumbai Serial Blasts case in
1993 RDX was used which was smuggled from Gujarat coast to Mumbai. On 28th
April, 2006 one Ijju Sheikh, an aide of Dawood Ibrahim, an Underworld Don, was
arrested from Mumbai. Ijju Sheikh had smuggled RDX from Gujarat to Mumbai. He
had given certain information to the police and the police would make him face-to-face
with another Dawood aide Umar Miyan Bukhari who was deported to Mumbai from
Dubai in December, 2005 and who was subjected to narcoanalysis and brain
fingerprinting tests at Gandhinagar, Ahmedabad.47

2.5.14 2006 Mumbai Serial Blasts —Identification of clues in terrorist mind.— In the
case of serial blasts in sub-urban trains of Mumbai on 11th July, 2006 (i.e., 11/7 serial
blasts) the Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) of Mumbai Police had sought permission from
the Court for conducting lie detection, brain mapping and narcoanalysis tests on the
arrested suspects, viz., Kamal Ahmad Ansari, Mumtaz Maqbool Chaudhary, Faizal
Sheikh, Mujammil Sheikh, Dr. Tanveer Ansari, Sohail Sheikh, Jameer Sheikh, Kalid
Aziz Sheikh and Etesham Siddiqui. It is believed that the suspected persons have link
with Laskhar-e-Toiba, a banned outfit. The tests would be conducted at Bangalore and

44
Retrieved from us.rediff.com., visited on December 15, 2012
45
Retrieved from in.news.yahoo.com., visited on October 6, 2012.
46
Retrieved from www.rediff.com, visited on October 12, 2012.
47
Retrieved from www.outlookindia/pti_news.asp?id=296155, visited on April 29, 2011

60
it was proposed that the tests would be conducted first on Kamal Ansari, the prime
suspect. In the incident about 200 persons were killed and over 600 persons were
injured.48

2.5.15 Terrorist attack at Indian Institute of Science (IISc), Bangalore— Disclosure


of facts by terrorist.—On December 28, 2005 a terrorist attack was made at Indian
Institute of Science (IISc), Bangalore. The arrested suspect Abdul Rehman alias Raiz-
ur-Rehman was subjected to nacroanalysis and brain mapping tests and he had admitted
that he met the Laskar-e-Toiba top brass including Abdul Rehman Makki, Abdul Aziz,
Abu Hamza etc. while he was in Saudi Arabia. He also admitted that he had worked for
Hizbul Mujahideen. He also admitted his visit to Dhaka in 2003, earlier for which he
had denied. He also disclosed that Naveed and Naushad had conducted the terrorist
attack. Naveed is supposed to be Ghulam Yezdani like Rahman who native of Nalgonda,
Andhra Pradesh and who operates from Saudi Arabia and Bangladesh for Harkat-ul-
Jehadi-Islami.49

2.5.16 Bechu Rehaman’s case—Seeking for test.—Narcoanalysis, brain mapping and


polygraphic tests on Bechu Rehaman, an accused of Sabarimala Thantri Kandararu
Mohanararu assault case was refused by Ernakulam Court on the ground that accused
was not physically fit to undergo the test. He was remanded to judicial custody after 9
days’ police custody. The case is related to the assault by Bechu Rehaman by means of
manhandling, forcible photography with a woman and threatening of Sabarimala of
Lord Ayyappa temple.50

2.5.17 Abdul Rehman’s case—Identification of terrorist.—A Gulbarga resident Shami


Ahmed Saha alias Abdul Rehman, aged about 31 years was arrested by Gulbarga police
and he was subjected to polygraph and brain mapping tests at Forensic Science
Laboratory, Bangalore on 31 March, 2006. He is alleged to be an activist of Laskhar-e-

48
Retrieved from www.dnaindia.com/report.asp?NewsID=1049812, visited on September 1, 2011.
49
Retrieved from (1) www.hvk.org/articles/0106/96.html; www.kashmirlive.com/full_story.php?
content_id=85918, visited on July 12,2012.
50
Retrieved from www.newkerala.com/news4.php?action=fullnews&id=34784, visited on July
18,2012

61
Toiba, a banned outfit. He was subjected to these tests to get information about the
activities, movements and plans of this terrorist outfit.51

2.5.18 Goa Gutka Baron, J.M. Joshi’s case—Clues about smuggling.—Goa Gutka
Baron J.M. Joshi was subjected to polygraphic test by CB1 in March 2006 to ascertain
his role in smuggling of gutka machine to Pakistan and his links with Dawood Ibrahim,
an Underworld Don. Brain mapping was also to be conducted at Central Forensic
Science Laboratory (CFSL), Gujarat.52

2.5.19 Abu Salem’s case—Fruitful investigation.—Narcoanalysis test conducted on


gangster Abu Salem at Government Bowring and Lady Curzon Hospital, Bangalore had
given a new line and direction to the investigating agencies. The information sought by
Mumbai Police has been obtained by conducting polygraph, brain mapping and
narcoanalysis test on Abu Salem. The narco test was conducted on Salem which lasted
for four hours in a closely guarded operation threatre. The whole process was video-
graphed by a Forensic Science Lab Official. After the test Abu Salem was transported
to Mumbai.53

2.5.20 Naxalite Mallika’s test—Investigation of further Naxal activities.—


Narcoanalysis test was conducted on a Naxalite Mallika who was arrested in November
2005 because even after intense and sustained interrogation Mallika did not reveal
anything about Naxalite’s activities.54

2.5.21 Mumbai Police encounter specialist Inspector Daya Nayak’s case—To elicit
information.—-Daya Nayak the dismissed cop of Mumbai police would be subjected to
polygraph, brain mapping and narcoanalysis tests at Bangalore’s Forensic Science
Laboratory according to officials of Anti-Corruption Bureau. The tests would be
conducted in order to elicit the information from Daya Kayak.

51
Retrieved from www.deccanherald.com/deccanherald/Apr62006/city197221200645.asp, visited on
June 11,2012
52
Retrieved from www.sentinelassam.com/sentinel_en/archives/mar1005/national.htm., visited on
August 21,2012.
53
Retrieved from www.indianexpress.com/full-story.php?content_id=85008; in.news.yahoo.com/
051230/48/61siz.html, visited on October 13, 2012.
54
Retrieved from www.deccanherald.com/deccanherald/Apr62006/city197221200645.asp. visited on
October 19, 2012.

62
2.5.22 Abdul Karim Ladsab Telgi’s case—Confession of crime.—In our country a
multi-crore stamp paper scam was committed by Abdul Karim Telgi. About 300 brain
mapping tests and also lie detection tests were conducted on him which showed that
Telgi was guilty of the crime. In the brain mapping test Telgi was made to sit in the
chair and was asked to close his eyes and then a headband equipped with 32 electrodes
was attached to his scalp. The target words were presented to him and his changed brain
activation pattern was recorded on EEG.

2.5.23 Narcoanaiysis Test on Abdul Karim Telgi.—The prime accused in multicrore


stamp paper scam Abdul Karim Telgi was subjected to Narcoanaiysis test on 3rd
March, 2004. A legal debate ensued over the test and the manner and procedure of the
test. During the test Telgi revealed some names but his lawyer contested the results. The
reliability of the test is to be heard by the Mumbai High Court where the hearing is to
start from 24th February, 2007. Telgi was earlier subjected to lie detector test and P-
300/brain mapping test. His lawyer was of the view that narcoanalysis should not be
done as it may pose threat to life but Dr. S. Malini of FSL, Bangalore said that the drug
used in She test is completely safe. In this case of multicrore stamp paper scam Antim
Totla and his brother-in-law Prakash Takhete were also subjected to polygraph tests on
29th December, 2003. The aforesaid persons were closed to the prime accused Abdul
Karim Telgi, The tests were performed at Ahmadabad and they derived the charges. It
was further proposed to conduct P-300 brain fingerprinting and narcoanaiysis on them.
The tests were conducted after seizure of certain documents from the residence of
Totla.55

2.5.24 Narcoanalysis test on Abdul Rehman for the identification of terrorist


activities,—A Gulbarga resident Shami Ahamad Saha alias Abdul Rehman (31) was
arrested on 31-3-2006 and was subjected to polygraph, narcoanalysis and brain mapping
tests at Forensic Science Laboratory at Bangalore. He is alleged to be a member of
Laskhar-e-Toiyaba, a banned outfit.

2.5.25 Narcoanalysis test in Bechu Rehman’s case,—Narcoanalysis, brain mapping


and polygraphic test on accused Bechu Rahman was refused by Ernakulam Court on the

55
Retrieved from us.rediff.com/news/2003/dec/29/stamp 1.htm, visited on January 1, 2013.

63
ground that accused was not physically fit to undergo the test. He was remanded to
judicial custody after 9 days’ police custody.

2.5.26 Narcoanalysis test on Mumbai Police Inspector Day a Nat/afc to elicit


information.—Daya Nayak, the dismissed cop of Mumbai Police would be subjected to
brain mapping and narcoanalysis tests at Bangalore Forensic Science Laboratory
according to officials of Anti-corruption Bureau. The tests would be conducted in order
to elicit the information from Daya Nayak.

2.5.27 Narcoanalysis test on Naxalite Mallika for extracting information bout naxal
activities.—Narcoanalysis test was conducted on a Naxahte allika in November 2005
because even after intense and sustained interrogation she did not reveal anything about
Naxal activities.

2.5.28 Narcoanalysis test on suspects who attacked the Indian Institute of Science,
Bangalore—Disclosure of facts by terrorist,—On December 28, 2005 a terrorist attack
was made on the Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore. The arrested suspect Adbul
Rehman alias Raiz-ur-Rehman was subjected to narcoanalysis and brain mapping tests
and he had admitted that he met the Lashkar-e-Toiyaba top brass including Abdul
Rehman Makki, Abdul Aziz, Abu Hamza, etc. while he was in Saudi Arabia. He also
admitted that he had worked for Hizbul Mujahideen, an terrorist outfit. He also admitted
his visit to Dhaka in 2003, earlier for which he had denied. He also disclosed that
Naveed and Naushad had conducted the terrorist attack. Naveed is supposed to be
Ghulam Yezdan and Rehman is native of Nalgonda in Andhra Pradesh who operates
from Saudi Arabia and Bangladesh for Harkat-ul-jehadi-Islami.56

2.5.29 Narcoanalysis test on suspects of Mumbai blast case for the identification of
clues in terrorist mind.—In the case of blasts in sub-urban trains of Mumbai on 11th
July, 2006 the Anti-terrorist Squad of Mumbai Police had sought permission from the
Court for conducting lie detector, brain mapping and narcoanalysis tests on the arrested
suspects, viz., Kamal Ahmad Ansari, Mumtaz Maqbool Chaudhary, Faizal Sheikh,
Mujammil Sheikh, Dr. Tanveer Ansari, Sohail Sheikh, Jaiveer Shaikh, Khalid Aziz

56
Retrieved from www.hvk.org/articles/0106/96.html; www.kashmirlive.com/full_story.php?
Content_id85918, visited on October 12, 2011.

64
Sheikh and Etesham Sidiqui. It is believed that the suspected persons have link with
Laskhar-e-Toiyaba, a banned outfit. The tests would be conducted at Bangalore and it
was proposed that the tests would be conducted first on Kamal Ansari, the prime
suspect. In the incident 200 persons were killed and over 600 persons were injured.
Ahmad Sheikh and Tanveer Ansai were subjected to brain mapping test on 4
September, 2006 at FSL, Bangalore and were likely to be subjected to narcoanalysis test
in Victoria Hospital, Mumbai.

2.5.30 Narcoanalysis test on Ijju Sheikh for face-to-face probe.—In the Bombay blast
case in 1993 RDX was used which was smuggled from Gujarat coast to Mumbai. On
23th April, 2006 one Ijju Sheikh, an aide of Dawood Ibrahim, an underworld Don, was
arrested, Ijju Sheikh had smuggled RDX from Gujarat coast to Mumbai He had given
certain information to the police and the police would make him face-to-face with
another Dawood man Umarmiyan Buknari who was deported to Mumbai from Dubai in
December 2006 and who was subjected to narcoanalysis and brain fingerprinting test.57

2.5.31 Narcoanalysis test on actress Preeti Jain and Naresh Pardesi.—Preeti Jain, an
actress, alleged that the film-maker Madhur Bhandarkar promised film roles in
exchange of sex but refused to fulfil his promises- It was alleged by Bhandarkar that
Preeti Jain hired an assassin of Arun Gavali’s gang to kill him and in turn Madhur
Bhandarkar paid Rs. 50,000 to Arun Gavali to file complaint against Ms. Jain. The hit
man was Naresh Pardesi and he was put to narcoanalysis test and revealed that Rs.
50,000 was paid by Bhandarkar to Gavali to file complaint against Ms. Jain.

2.5.32 Madur Bhandarkar matter.—According to police version, actress Pretti Jain


gave Rs. 2.5 lakhs to Naresh Pardesi, a former associate of gangster Arun Gavali. The
police claims to have a sure-shot case. The contract killer ‘was also identified according
to police and his name is Sami, a person resident of U.P.-Bihar border. Preeti Jain was
put to He-detector test and brain mapping test while Pardeshi was put to a narcoanalysis
test. Pardesi had hatched the plans as revealed under the influence of sodium pentothal,
a drug injected while conducting narcoanalysis. Pardeshi told that Preeti hired him for
eliminating Bhandarkar, who wanted to kill Preeti after false accusation of rape by her.

57
Retrieved from www.outlookindia/pti_news.asp?id=296155, visited on September 11, 2013.

65
The aforesaid confession was recorded in presence of an anesthetist, a general physician
and a clinical psychologist.58

2.5.33 Narcoanalysis test on suspects of Malegoan bomb blast.—In the case of


Malegaon blast the Mumbai Police had arrested Nuorulhodha Samsudoha and wanted a
narcoanalysis test on him. The trial Court refused to give permission for narcoanalysis
whereas the Sessions Court had allowed the police application for conduct of
narcoanalysis test. Samsudoha moved Mumbai High Court for stay on the order of
Sessions Court but the Hon’ble Judge refused to grant stay. 59

2.5.34 Narcoanalysis test on accused of Krushi Bank scam.—In the case of Krushi
Bank scam in Hyderabad K. Venkateshwara Rao was the prime accused. Rao reportedly
refused to undergo narcoanalysis test stating that it may pose a risk to his life. After his
refusal he was again lodged in jail. Mr. G. Ashok Reddy, counsel for Rao, argued that
the test may result in risk to life of Rao. The counsel said that before conducting tests on
his client the requisite medical consent and the consent of his relatives should also be
taken. Rao refused to give his assent. Rao was perhaps under the fear that if he reveals
the names of the persons as revealed by Telgi, prime accused in multicrore stamp paper
scam, there will be a danger to his life.

2.5.35 Narcoanalysis test on Nadeem Kashmiri to elicit information. –A Bangalore


City Court had granted permission for narcoanalysis test on Nadeem Kashmiri, a HSBC
employee, who has been charge-sheeted for BPO fraud. The Forensic Science
Laboratory was granted permission to conduct the test. Earlier He detector and brain
mapping tests had showed that Kashmiri was lying. The fraud involved scam of
2,33,000 pounds.60

2.5.36 Narcoanalysis, Brain mapping and Lie detector tests of Nithari’s Serial Killers
in U.P.—In a serial killings case of Nithari (U.P.) Police arrested two persons,
Moninder Singh Pandher and Surendra Koli, for murdering 30 children and women who
were sexually abused after and/or before murders. Police had recovered a sow and many

58
Retrieved from www.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1231628.cms and www.expressindia.
com/ fullstory.php? Newsid=54664, visited on June 13, 2011.
59
Retrieved from www.kaumudi.com/news/102506/india.stm, visited April 11, 2012.
60
Retrieved from www.newskerala.com, visited on March 8, 2012.

66
things which the two used to cut up the parts of the bodies and disposed of their bodies
separately, never at one go or at one place in the sewer behind the house of the accused.
A copy of Kinsey Report on sexual behaviour has also been found from the accused’s
house. Both of the accused were subjected to narcoanalysis, brain mapping and
polygraph tests. In brain mapping names of some Ministers of State of U.P. and doctors
cropped up. Test was conducted at DPS, Gandhinagar (Gujarat). Audio and video props
were designed to focus mainly on two subjects among a host of others—nature of their
sexual perversion and whether this was the only reason behind serial killings and rapes.
After the brain mapping both were subjected to narcoanalysis test. In the test sodium
pentothal was administered as a truth serum. Both the accused had been cooperative
before questioning. The narcoanalysis test showed Surendra to be a cannibal psychopath
driven by sexual impotency.

2.6 CONCLUSION

These tests can be successfully used to fight custodial deaths. The investigating
agencies have carried out these tests in a number of high profile cases. Rapidly and
swiftly these scientific tools of investigation can become an alternate of third degree
physical torture in police custody. As was rightly held by the Supreme Court in D. K.
Basu v. State of West Bengal61 , that there is need for developing scientific methods of
investigation and interrogation of accused as custodial deaths and torture is nothing but
a blow at rule of law.

61
AIR 1997, SC 610

67

You might also like