Feffines: Tortn
Feffines: Tortn
Feffines: Tortn
2. Hinors:
manner and to
Minority is no defence in the law of tolts. A minor is liable in the silme
fraud etc'
the samefa extent as an adult in torts e.g. nuisance, ascault, trespass,
intention or
But in those cases where some special mental element (e.g. malice,
knowledge) is essential e.g. deceit, defamation, extreme
youth or in sufftcient
of understanding
maturity is a good defence, However, if there is sufficient maturity
in the minor he will be liable.But contracts entered into by a minor are void and
unenforceable.
Rule (1): One can't convelt a breach of contract into a toft to sue a minor.
Fact: A minor hired a horse. He injured it by overriding. An action for toft was filed.
Held: It was in essence not a tort but a breach of contract so minor is not liable.
3. Corporfltions:
A corporation can't be sued unless
(l) the act done was within the scope of the agent and officials employed by it e.g.
master liable for seruant.
1
2, The act done was within the purpose of the incorporation e.g. deciet, defamation
and malicious prosecutions.
So a corporation is liable for torts committed by its agents or officials unless the
plaintiff proves the following:
4. Trade Unions: /)
A trade union cannot be sued untess it/issued in its registered name.
1. Convicls.' ln England can't sue for wrongs against propefi. But in Bangladesh
and India Convicts can sue for torts or wrongs done to person or property.
3. Husband und wife: In England a wife coutd not sue her husband for a toft. Nor
could a husband sue his wife as in the eye of law they were treated as one person.
They could not sue each other or be sued separately. This law has been reformed by
the Law Reform (husband & wife) Act of 1962 by which a husband and wife Gan sue
each other. In Bangladesh an action in toft by husband or wife against each other
and separate action is maintainable.
Case: Walker v. Great Northern Railway (782O)
Fact: A pregnant woman was injured in a railway accident, as a result to which the
child was born deformed.
J".-
4 Held: As there was no duty of care to an unborn person the child could not maintain
an action for damages. The defendant is not liable.
4. Corporation:
Corporations are aftificial person, ft an't sue for wrong of person but a corporation
can sue for wrongs affecting ptoperty or business,
5. A child in the mothers womb: An infant can sue by his guardian for
any tort done to him but not when he was in the mothers womb.