Polymedia Based Instruction in Purposive Communication

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 14

Polymedia Based Instruction in Purposive

Communication
Ryan Jayson V. Delos Reyes
College of Teacher Education, Urdaneta City University, Philippines
[email protected]; [email protected]

Date received: September 2, 2020


Date received in revised form: September 30, 2020
Date accepted: November 20, 2020

Recommended citation:

Delos Reyes, R.J. (2020). Polymedia Based Instruction in Purposive


Communication. Puissant, 1, 98-113.

Abstract

This paper focused on the development and validation of Polymedia Based


Instruction (PBI) materials in Purposive Communication (PC) classes at Urdaneta City
University. Descriptive and developmental research designs were employed in this study.
The subjects include the PC Instructors and selected pre-service teachers taking the course.
This study identified five topics which were determined by the 8 PC instructors namely:
Effective Communication, Intercultural Communication, Guidelines to Avoid Plagiarism,
Power of Information and Communication Technology, and PowerPoint Presentation. PBI
materials were developed for each topic and were categorized into 3. These are direct
materials, interactive materials, and task-based materials. PBI materials were given a highly
acceptable remark from the pre-service teachers in the Purposive Communication course.
From the above findings, the following conclusions were drawn: Most of the identified
topics needing computer-aided instructions using PBI materials dealt with speaking and
writing skills; PBI materials developed covered spoken texts, mini-lecture, clips, related
examples, interactive voice prompts, and computer-aided instructions; and, PBI materials
are highly accepted in delivering the identified topics in the identified course. Moreover,
the following recommendations are forwarded: language teachers may use PBI materials
as teaching strategies in speaking and writing classes; administrators and language
teachers may optimize the PBI materials developed in teaching Purposive Communication
course; language teachers may incorporate PBI materials in teaching Purpose
Communication course; language teachers may design additional PBI materials to enhance
the speaking and writing skills of the learners, and future researchers may explore other
variables that can potentially signify to the PBI materials in teaching other related subjects.

Keywords – polymedia, polymedia based instruction, spoken texts, task-based materials,


purposive communication
INTRODUCTION

Researches' positive effect of good communication practices abounds (Francis, 2007).


It is a growing interest in the learning of the English language in developing countries due
to the position it has taken all over the world in many areas of social development (Pérez,
2016). A lot of concerns about speaking skills since it is the least practiced in contexts where
this language is taught as a foreign language (EFL). Chamot and O'Malley (1987) also said
that particular attention is paid to self-monitoring which has been linked to productive
language to effective ESL listeners on how will they comprehend an oral text. As
accounted by the Colombian Ministry of National Education Guide of 2006 in Schleicher
(2006, page number?), “a foreign language is the one which is not used among the
immediate or local environment and it can be principally learned inside a classroom where
students are generally exposed to the language during controlled class periods”.

Communication, technically, is learned in the classroom setting- a community of


students with different backgrounds and experiences as a result of several factors that
contribute to their development. Communication courses then serve the purpose of
teaching students to value the discipline of communication, understand communication
content, and practice communication skills effectively (Campbell, Strawser, & George,
2016). Communication skills are important for all academic, professional, and social
experiences and, consequently, play a major role in a student’s academic success (Simonds
et al., 2012). As Brown (2016) also stated, observations of students and their academic
performance and engagement indicate that there may be something to be gained from
understanding individual communication styles and communication in a group context.
Notably, the content of the basic communication course has changed dramatically over
time and progressed from public address to multimodal communication (Campbell et al.,
2016).

The proliferation of new communication technologies and the increased convergence


that has been observed in the last few years are radically transforming interpersonal
communication. This coincides with an increased demand for mediated communication
given the rise in global migration (Madianou, 2012). Further, humans have developed a
relationship with information technology in the communication system or as the medium
in the classroom setting (Lang, 2014). The technology in the classroom correlates positive
experiences and outcomes from the students through communicative behaviors within a
supportive and structured system. Technology is an aspect of development in the
classroom teaching for better comprehension of the learners. This profound
transformation in the usage of increasingly converged communication technologies has
implications for the ways interpersonal communication is enacted and experienced. This
scenario brought about the necessity of the use of Polymedia.

Polymedia is a kind of multimodal in the education area. This deals with the new trend
of learning in the four corners of the classroom. This combined the multimedia and
interpersonal communication that innovate the learning scheme of the learners because
their common learning style is exposure to technology. Polymedia is an emerging
environment of communicative opportunities that functions as an 'integrated structure'
within which each medium is defined in relational terms in the context of all other media.
Moreover, as studied by Madianou and Miller (2012), in conditions of polymedia, the
emphasis shifts from a focus on the qualities of each particular medium as a discrete
technology, to an understanding of new media as an environment of affordances.

This idea states the established learning environments that are responsive to the
learners’ diversity-interactive environments that are learning-focused and that efficiently
manage the learners’ behavior in physical and virtual spaces through the use of polymedia.
Students learn more if there is a practice of these modern adaptations of modalities. With
the incorporation of different media, the senses of the learners are used, which makes
them learn at a concrete level and learn more when the texts being taught to them are
presented in a manner that makes them more physically encouraging and appealing.

With this, the teachers' ability to apply developmentally appropriate and meaningful
pedagogy grounded on the content knowledge is also recognized. It takes into account
the teachers' aptitude in the teaching and learning process, as well as needed skills in the
use of communication strategies, teaching strategies, and technologies to promote high-
quality learning outcomes.

Along with the emergence of 21st-century skills, the modern classroom has also
enhanced its methods through the engagement of different learning modes which cater
to the different needs of millennial learners. Thus, this study is pursued to determine the
acceptability of the developed Polymedia Based Instruction (PBI) materials in teaching
Purposive Communication classes. This gives additional teaching-learning strategies for
21st-century learners.

LITERATURE REVIEW

Technology Integration in Education

Technology integration is the use of technology tools in general content areas in


education to allow students to apply computer and technology skills to learning and
problem-solving. It is defined as the use of technology to enhance and support the
educational environment. In education, the integration of technology is very important,
especially in the curriculum.

Curriculum integration with the use of technology involves the infusion of


technology as a tool to enhance the learning in a content area or multidisciplinary setting.
Effective integration of technology is achieved when students can select technology tools
to help them obtain information promptly, analyze and synthesize the information, and
present it professionally to an authentic audience. The technology should become an
integral part of how the classroom functions—as accessible as all other classroom tools;
though the focus in each lesson or unit is the curriculum outcome, not the technology.
The integration of technology in the educational system with a standard curriculum
cannot only give students a sense of power but also allows for more advanced learning
among broad topics. However, these technologies require infrastructure, continual
maintenance, and repair – one determining element, among many, in how these
technologies can be used for curricula purposes and whether or not they will be successful.
Examples of the infrastructure required to operate and support technology integration in
schools include at the basic level electricity, Internet service providers, routers, modems,
and personnel to maintain the network, beyond the initial cost of the hardware and
software (Kervin & Mantei, 2010).

Moreover, a standard education curriculum with the integration of technology can


provide tools for advanced learning among a broad range of topics in the classroom.
Integration of information and communication technology is often closely monitored and
evaluated due to the current climate of accountability, outcome-based education, and
standardization in the assessment. Presently, teachers are aware of the use of technology
in the learning process. Yet some of them viewed this as a challenge to the
learners and to them as well.

Thus, interactivity occurs when a learner actively adapts to information being


presented by a form of technology, which in turn adapts to the learner and the teachers.
This process is commonly known as feedback. A greater emphasis is now placed on the use
of animation and interaction between teachers and learners. Moreover, interactive
teaching is not only a principle but also a method and techniques in the learning process
using technology. This technology is now the means of learning in the teaching process.

Polymedia in Learning

Learning is an active process in which the learner uses sensory input and constructs
meaning out of it. The more traditional formulation of this idea involves the new
terminology that learning involves the learners in engaging with the world. Learning is not
the passive acceptance of knowledge but the organization of experiences that allows the
individual to "go beyond the information given" (Francis, 2007). This states that learning is
a continuous process where technology is used in classroom discussions.

Technology contributes to global development and diversity in classrooms while


helping to develop the fundamental building blocks needed for students to achieve more
complex ideas. For technology to make an impact within the educational system, teachers
and students must have access to technology in a contextual manner that is culturally
relevant, responsive, and meaningful to their educational practice and that promotes
quality teaching and active student learning (Kervin & Mantei, 2010). Shazia (2000)
examines the teacher's role in classrooms with computers in his study. The teachers need
to teach the process of learning rather than its products. This requires the explicit teaching
of ways of organizing cooperative activities involving computers, whether in face-to-face
groups around a single machine and with activities using technology in the class. She also
added that the new technologies in collaborative contexts in teaching had identified to
teachers in finding ways to model activities with the learners.

The effects of mastering different tasks shed light on the use of interactive videos
on the job. Remember that the localization of information is an important objective of on-
the-job tasks in the learning process (Guthrie, 1988; Guthrie & Kirsch, 1987). This
information benefited the instructors because of the availability of topics in the multimodal
learning materials. However, efficient use of such features depends on the users' ability to
employ appropriate strategies using multimodal learning materials. In this respect, it was
shown that the localization of isolated information should be possible without further
instructional materials support, whereas training is necessary to prepare users for the
mastery of more complex task assignments. For this purpose, the students' prerequisites
that they bring to the learning environment, as well as the pedagogical objectives that the
instructor pursues.

Thompson (2013) added that interactivity was rarely defined directly; it is cited as a
concept that distinguished new technologies. He also introduced the advantages of
technology, namely: selectivity: the complexity of available choice, meaning the amount
and variety of user choices, the effort that any user of a media system must exert to access
information; and, responsiveness (conversationality): interactivity is a continuous variable
measuring how "actively responsive a medium is to users", information use monitoring,
that is, how well informed selection can be monitored across an entire population of users,
ease of adding information, meaning the degree to which users can add information for
access by a mass, undifferentiated audience, and interpersonal communication facilitation,
which comes in at least two forms: asynchronous (allowing users to respond to messages
at their convenience) and synchronous (allowing for concurrent participation). In this
study, these vouch for the effective use of technology in the communication classroom
especially in delivering topics by the teachers using Polymedia.
Consequently, teachers need to be trained to present their lessons in a wide variety
of ways and assess learners using different instructions according to their interests and
readiness in accordance to Gardner's (1993) Multiple Intelligences Theory where students'
potentials are further enhanced through multi-modal approaches. Included in the
multimodal approach is interactive teaching. This deemed the utilization of Polymedia in
such instructions in delivering the discussions.

Also, technology cannot stand without the teacher who will operate and provide
innovations for the effectiveness of the materials used in the delivery of language in the
classroom. The formulation of polymedia is anchored in the continuity of concepts in the
teaching and learning process of the teachers, learners, and technology.

METHODOLOGY

This study used descriptive and developmental research designs. The descriptive
research method describes situations. It is a fact-finding methodology with an adequate
interpretation of profiles, attitudes, opinions, views, and contrast characteristics of
communities, people, processes, and events. This pertains to the gathering of information
about certain conditions or situations for description and interpretation. Descriptive
research was utilized in the interpretation, analysis, classification, and tabulation of the
result of the developed PBI materials.

The developmental method, on the other hand, is suitable when developing,


designing, and evaluating instructional programs, products, and processes (Seels & Richey,
1994). Instructional development is defined by Heinech et al. (2002) as the process of
analyzing needs, determining what content must be mastered, establishing educational
goals, and designing materials to reach the objectives. These methods are suitable when
developing and validating a product such as a module, textbook, manual, or internet
program.

Developmental research designs are the systematic study of designing, developing,


and evaluating instructional programs, processes, and products that must meet the
criteria. In this research, there are four stages in the development of PBI materials (Figure
1), namely: planning, development, validation/evaluation, and outcome/final phase.

Development Final Phase


Planning Validation

Figure 1. Stages in the development of PBI materials

In the planning stage, the researcher asked the instructors to determine the topics
needing Polymedia Based Instruction (PBI) materials in the Purposive Communication
course through a questionnaire. The development stage follows. The researcher gathered
information in the development of PBI and edited the materials based on the need of the
learners in the course. A collaboration of ideas among the instructors was done during the
development. Then, the validation stage follows. Language experts evaluated the validity
and appropriateness of the PBI materials; comments and suggestions were examined and
incorporated. These were all inputs to its final revisions.

This study utilized researcher-developed questionnaires as its main data-gathering


instruments. These underwent content validation from five (5) language experts in the
university before actual administration. PBI Identification Checklist and PBI Level of
Acceptability Test were the instruments used by the researcher.

PBI Identification Checklist. This is a questionnaire checklist utilized in identifying the


topics in the course Purposive Communication (PC) for the development of PBI materials.
The topics were based on the CHED Memorandum Order (CMO) 20, s. 2013. There were five
(5) topics of Purposive Communication ranked highest by the respondents in the
development of PBI materials.
Table 1. Interpretation of Level of Acceptability
RATING LEVEL OF ACCEPTABILITY DESCRIPTION
4 Highly Acceptable PBI provides very acceptable materials to reinforce language
teaching and students' learning. Specifically, the content is sufficient
to achieve the learning competencies. The lessons are presented.
The content is well-delivered and appropriate for the course. It
provides varied exercises. The presentation is coherent with
excellent animation and transition of slides which aids in the
understanding of students. The audio is clear.
3 Acceptable PBI provides very acceptable materials to reinforce language
teaching and students' learning. Specifically, the content is sufficient
to achieve the learning competencies. The lessons are presented.
The content is well-delivered and appropriate for the course. Some
exercises lack variation. The presentation is coherent with excellent
animation and transition of slides which aids in the understanding of
students. The audio is clear.
2 Moderately Acceptable PBI provides very acceptable materials to reinforce language
teaching and students' learning. Specifically, the content failed to
cover about 2 or 3 learning competencies. The lessons are presented.
The content is well-delivered and appropriate for the course. Some
exercises lack variation. Animation and transition have some
glitches. The audio is clear.

1 Not Acceptable Content is limited to the development of a few learning


competencies. The presentation lacks coherence. Several glitches
are observed in the audio and visual presentation.

PBI Level of Acceptability. This study used a questionnaire checklist instrument in


getting the level of acceptability of the developed PBI materials. It consisted of two parts
namely: content and presentation. Content deals with the connection of ideas to the topic,
clear view and understanding to the learners, mechanics, and contextualization of the
discussions in a school setting; while the presentation is on the organization of ideas,
aesthetics, mechanics, and creativity, and audiovisual presentation. The interpretation of
the level of acceptability of the PBI materials in Purposive Communication classes is
indicated in Table 1.

RESULTS
This study is designed to develop, assess, and validate Polymedia Based Instruction
(PBI) materials in Purposive Communication (PC) and to test their acceptability. This
section presents the findings and interpretation of the study.

Topics in Purposive Communication


for PBI Materials

Table 2 presents the top 5 ranked that needs PBI materials in Purposive
Communication. Effective Communication was ranked 2nd to be needing of PBI materials
by the PC instructors. Among other factors, difficulty in expressing ideas especially during
recitation, presentation, and reporting activities was observed to be a common problem
among the PC students. Instructors believed that one of the reasons for this is a lack of
confidence. Respondent F observed that learners opt to stay quiet as they are rather afraid
to be criticized when an error is committed. The language uses wisely, Respondent E
shared that criminology students can hardly express themselves in English; whereas
engineering, architecture, and computer students perceive this to be less relevant in their
course.

Table 2 Topics in purposive communication for PBI materials


TOPICS RANK
Effective Communication 2
Intercultural Communication 2
Power of Information and Communication Technology 4.5
Powerpoint Presentation 4.5
Guidelines to Avoid Plagiarism 2

Given the above concerns and with the instructors' interest in providing innovation
in getting the students to engage in effective communication, PBI materials were
perceived to fit the teaching of this topic. Generally, the materials integrated images and
voice prompt associated with the experiences and interests of the learners to facilitate a
better understanding of the topic and increased participation. These are also considered a
word choice/ terminology that caters to the group's level of understanding believing that
interactions may arise while regulating fear of sharing ideas. The ideas in the materials were
presented and explained comprehensively to encourage the learners to participate in the
discussions.

Sharing the same rank is the topic of Intercultural Communication. Culture is a


factor in the development of communication in the school. This topic provides an
understanding of individual differences, practices, and values from the international to
local points of view. Instructors know that their students graduated from different high
schools. Inevitably, the way the students communicate may be different from the other
students. As observed, the learners are not aware of the nuances of communication among
different groups such as Ilocanos, Pangasinenses, Kampampangan, and the like. The
communication practices of the learners were carried from the culture they are exposed
to. So, the PC teachers believed that aiding the teaching of intercultural communication
with PBI materials, given the features earlier presented, may raise awareness among
learners to understand and adjust to various communication differences. This, in any way,
addresses the concern on code-switching in classes as a means of expressing ideas on a
certain topic. Thus, teachers must design opportunities where students are encouraged to
use the target language and train to use English as their medium of communication in
language classes.

Finally, Guidelines to Avoid Plagiarism completes the topics similarly at ranked 2 by


the respondents. Given the written outputs of the students as reports and other
requirements, the respondents observed that a great percentage of the contents were
rather copied, pasted, and printed from the free access articles on the internet whose
authors were not even cited nor acknowledged. Respondent A said plagiarism remains a
common problem despite that the topic is part of the high school curriculum. In the PC
subject, this topic is part of the syllabus so understanding additional information as the
guidelines in proper citations of the students also sets significant importance. Respondent
D suggested that providing the learners’ lengthy paragraphs to paraphrase or to
summarize based on their understanding may help them understand the statements
better. Interestingly, PBI materials in guidelines to avoid plagiarism provide instructions on
how to cite and acknowledge sources correctly in line with acceptable formats. Hence, the
need for PBI materials to provide easier and more understandable discussions about
guidelines to avoid plagiarism for the students' output is meaningful.

Power of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) was ranked at 4.5.


Having attended many seminars and pieces of training related to technology as teaching
tools, PC instructors believed that the use of ICT facilitates the making of instructional
materials, making examinations, and creating activities. In this way, they will have time to
study their lessons and provide their students with enough learning in the class. Also, ICT
will help the students to understand the lessons better. Instructors integrate movie clips
and presentations to deliver their discussions because students are visual learners.
Students can comprehend the topics easily. Respondent A explained that the function of
the technology is to deliver the lesson effectively which is aligned to the prime purpose of
the institution to provide accessible materials in delivering a lesson for the students.

Nowadays, students are more responsive to using technology. Research, reports,


requirements, and movie clips are accessible through ICT. Most of them also have access
to different social media accounts where information is shared easily. Instructors use
online platforms for teaching-learning such as google classroom, messenger, Google
Scholar, YouTube, and others. Instructors believed that ICT can catch attention and
participation in the discussion. So, the integration of technology as PBI materials in
discussion adds essence and meaning to the topics for the students.

PowerPoint Presentation also ranked at 4.5. PC instructors believed that


PowerPoint enriches the students' experiences in developing their skills because most of
the effective approaches nowadays are integrated with technology. Respondent B shared
that PowerPoint presentation is still functional in his classes; he integrates images and
videos too for more comprehensible discussions in class. As supported by Respondent A,
this attracts interaction among the students for a more fruitful discussion. Moreover,
Respondent D stated that such a platform is one of the easiest and accessible computer
applications in making instructional materials.

PBI materials for PowerPoint presentation follow guides in using this tool. The
respondents proved that PowerPoint presentation as topic needs of PBI materials. These
make learning how to make presentations with animations easy, added with images and
objects to attract the attention of the learners. It is also observed that the respondents are
into technology because presentations make it easy for them to prepare discussions. As
their practice, these should not contain heavy texts and animations. Thus, the profound
transformation in the usage of increasingly converged communication technologies has
implications for the ways interpersonal communication is enacted and experienced. This
scenario brought about the necessity of the use of polymedia based instruction (PBI)
materials in teaching.

PBI Materials Developed in Purposive Communication

PBI materials developed in Purposive Communication are presented in 3 categories.


These are direct materials, interactive materials, and task-based materials. It is to note that
the most effective teachers vary their styles depending on the nature of the subject matter,
the phase of the course, and other factors.

Direct PBI materials were developed containing images with spoken texts, mini-
lectures, related examples, and computer-aided instructions. These deliver mini-lectures
that bring the learners into a better understanding. The use of examples through
computer-aided instructions may capture the interest of the learners to participate. These
also use images, moving objects, and spoken texts in sending information to the learners.
Direct approaches and principles are seen in the topics of effective communication,
intercultural communication, power of ICT, and plagiarism. As to language use, these
expose the learners directly to the target language. Practically useful communication
instances are also provided. Interactive materials developed similarly contain images with
spoken texts, mini-lectures, related examples, and computer-aided instructions with the
inclusion of clips and interactive voice prompts. These materials were considered because
pictures and video clips attract and catch the attention of the learners to listen and
communicate following the examples and questions addressed to them. Also, computer-
aided instructions capture the interest of the learners to listen and speak. Task-based
materials present in PBI materials include related examples or activities, interactive voice
prompts, and computer-aided instructions. These materials were categorized here
because the examples and activities are addressed through spoken texts' directions. Task-
based materials are seen in effective communication focused on listening skills, review, and
activity in intercultural communication, tutorial in PowerPoint, and articles in plagiarism.
This focused on accomplishing activities and delivering explanations through computer-
aided instructions.

Acceptability of PBI Materials

The results of acceptability of PBI materials along with content (Table 3) and
presentation (Table 4) -- organization, mechanics, and audiovisual presentation were
determined.

Table 3. Level of acceptability of PBI materials along with content


CONTENT WM DE
1. The content of each lesson is directly relevant to the
4.0 HA
objectives of the course.
2. The content of the lesson is simple and easy to understand. 4.0 HA
3. The topics are fully discussed. 3.5 HA
4. The topics manifest clear ideas and understanding of the
4.0 HA
topics.
5. The topics are supported by examples related to the
3.7 HA
discussions.
6. Each topic provides practice tasks that are suited to the level
3.6 HA
of the learners.
7. Each topic is given equal emphasis in the lesson. 3.9 HA
8. The words and/or sentence structure are well-delivered and
4.0 HA
appropriate for the course.
9. The content is relevant to the knowledge of the learners. 4.0 HA
10. The words used are simple for better understanding. 3.9 HA
11. The topics are appropriate to the students’ level of
3.9 HA
understanding and at varying challenge levels.
12. It provides effective motivation in understanding the
4.0 HA
concepts relevant to the objective.
13. The objectives in each lesson manifested the intended
3.7 HA
purpose to be measured.
14. The topics are sufficient to cover the whole period. 3.7 HA
15. The topics are enough to enhance the cognitive and skills of
3.9 HA
the students.
AVERAGE WEIGHTED MEAN 3.87 HA
Legend: 3.25-4.00 = Highly Acceptable (HA); 2.50-3.24 = Acceptable (A); 1.75-2.49 =
Moderately Acceptable (MA); 1.0-1.74 = Not Acceptable (NA)

Content. Along with the highest indicators, the respondents considered the PBI
materials as relevant, clear, and concise about the objectives of the 5 topics. PBI materials
delivered the topics appropriately and effectively. This also adds motivation to get the
learners' attention. However, the respondents are aware of the objectives of each topic
because these were manifested in the result of PBI materials which is highly acceptable.
Moreover, the integration of PBI materials in teaching the topics was also remarkable to
the respondents because these were presented during their scheduled class hours. In
support, Respondent 7 said that the most useful aspect of the PBI materials is that students
become more attentive. This encouraged them to participate because they see the
discussions. Another, Respondent 14 said the developed PBI materials promote a better
understanding of the lessons and great learning.

Table 4. Level of acceptability of PBI materials along with a presentation


ORGANIZATION (AWM=3.80) WM DE
1. The presentation manifests cohesiveness and unity. 4.0 HA
2. The content is organized to help in the
development of key concepts. 3.7 HA

3. The topics are properly arranged and logically sequenced. 3.9 HA


4. The varied exercises are sufficient enough to realize the objectives
3.6 HA
and reinforce the students to learn more.
5. The topic headings are clear and well presented. 3.8 HA
MECHANICS (AWM=3.90) WM DE
1. The language used is simple and easy to understand in
terms of vocabulary and technical terminologies. 3.9 HA

2. Language structure used avoids misinterpretations. 4.0 HA


3. The language used is suitable for the ability of the
students. 4.0 HA

4. Learning new meanings within their understanding. 4.0 HA


5. The directions give clear information about the topic. 4.0 HA
AUDIO VISUAL PRESENTATION (AWM=3.90) WM DE
1. It uses effective audio-visual aids. 4.0 HA
2. It attracts the attention of the learners to learn better. 4.0 HA
3. It is of a reasonable length. 3.8 HA
4. It appeared emerging, attractive, and catchy to learners. 4.0 HA
5. It encourages participation and interaction among the learners. 3.7 HA
Overall Average Weighted Mean 3.91 HA
Legend: 3.25-4.00 = Highly Acceptable (HA); 2.50-3.24 = Acceptable (A); 1.75-2.49 =
Moderately Acceptable (MA); 1.0-1.74 = Not Acceptable (NA)

Finally, Respondent 32 stated that PBI materials present real-life situations as


examples through visual animations, and Respondent 36 supported that showing pictures
related to the topics while listening is a very useful aspect of PBI materials. These
statements proved that the content of PBI materials in 5 topics were acceptable and
effective in the learning of the students. Also, this promotes communication opportunities
among learners. Communication is very important in the language course, especially that
the respondents are pre-service teachers. As part of their training, the learners must be
versatile in using languages; especially they are the best instructional materials in
transferring the learning in class someday. The use of familiar terms in PBI materials may
help them improve their communication skills.

Presentation. In this study, cohesiveness is about the ideas that are fit together in
portraying clear understanding while unity expresses a single concept of the topic. This
means that the presentation has a coherence of ideas that helps to provide the vital
concepts in PBI materials. These are arranged in a comprehensive manner where the
learners are provided with a sort of activities to reinforce their understanding to learn
better. Also, this means that the information shown in PBI materials were transferred
attractively and comprehensively to the learners. This material is a reinforcement to the
teachers in teaching the topics. PBI materials only run for 4 to 8 minutes. So, the teachers
are asked to pause or interrupt the PBI materials if they need to explain or add information
about the topics. It can be gleaned in the 5 PBI materials the cohesiveness and unity of
concepts. However, this is shown that exposure to the internet, social media platform, and
movies influenced students' learning scheme. Students now possess gadgets to easily
access information on the internet. Integrating social media and movie clips in their
gadgets provides a better source of learning. Thus, PBI materials include these in the
discussions of the 5 topics.
DISCUSSION
This present study delved into the acceptability of the PBI materials in the Purposive
Communication course. This underwent a smooth yet rigid process to determine the result.
Initially, five topics were determined by the 8 PC instructors. These are Effective
Communication, Intercultural Communication, Guidelines to Avoid Plagiarism, Power of
Information and Communication Technology, and PowerPoint Presentation. The topics
were ranked highest because these need reinforcements of new teaching strategies to the
learning scheme of the PC students. The collaboration of ideas among the instructors and
the need of the learners started the development of Polymedia Based Instruction.
Subsequently, PBI materials developed from each topic was conceptualized. This was
presented in 3 categories namely: direct materials, interactive materials, and task-based
materials. These PBI materials developed supported the teachers in delivering the
discussions to the learners. This improved the learning process of the students because the
students are attracted to the materials developed integrated with PBI. This also improved
the learners' schemes in better understanding the topics. Finally, PBI materials were given
a highly acceptable remark from the pre-service teachers in the Purposive Communication
course. There are two areas of PBI materials namely: content and presentation. These
areas met the requirements needed in PBI materials which are also given highly acceptable
remarks. This proved that these PBI materials are considered new platforms of teaching
and a remarkable learning scheme of the pre-service teachers in Purposive Communication
class.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS


Based on the findings, the following conclusions were drawn: Most of the identified
topics needing computer-aided instructions using PBI materials dealt with speaking and
writing skills; PBI materials developed covered spoken texts, mini-lecture, clips, related
examples, interactive voice prompts, and computer-aided instructions; and, PBI materials
are highly accepted in delivering the identified topics in the identified course. The following
recommendations are forwarded: language teachers may use PBI materials as teaching
strategies in speaking and writing classes; administrators and language teachers may
optimize the PBI materials developed in teaching Purposive Communication course;
language teachers may incorporate PBI materials in teaching Purpose Communication
course; language teachers may design additional PBI materials to enhance the speaking
and writing skills of the learners, and future researchers may explore other variables that
can potentially signify to the PBI materials in teaching other related subjects.

IMPLICATIONS

As this research has shown, PBI materials serve as an innovation of a new trend of
teaching among the PC instructors. Also, this is an additional avenue of learning for learners
who are technology-oriented. Indeed, learners nowadays are living with technology. This
means that everything can be found through ICT. Although this may be true, students can
learn independently using technology. Thus, PBI materials are also designed to be used by
the students and learn exclusively.
REFERENCES
Brown, R. (2016). Communication in a diverse classroom: An annotated bibliographic review
(unpublished manuscript). City University of Seattle, Canada.
Campbell, H., Strawser, M. & George S. (2016). Communication education and international
audiences: Reflections on instructional challenges and pedagogical strategy. Journal
of International Student,6(2), 633-635.
Chamot, A. U., & O’Malley J.M. (1987). The cognitive academic language learning approach:
a bridge to the mainstream. TESOL Quarterly, 21(2), 227-249. doi:
https://doi.org/10.2307/3586733
Francis, T. A. (2007). A comparison of the self-reported levels of oral communication
apprehension of first-generation college students at two- and four-year institutions
(unpublished manuscript). University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas.
Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences classroom, 4th Edition. ASDC: Virginia, USA.
Guthrie, J. (1998). Locating information in documents: Examination of a cognitive model.
Reading Research Quarterly, 23(2), 178–199. doi:10.2307/747801.
Guthrie, J., & Kirsch I.S. (1987). Distinctions between reading comprehension and locating
information in text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(3), 220–227.
doi:10.1037/0022-0663.79.3.220.
Heinech, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J., & Smaldino S. (2002). Instructional media and
technologies for learning, 7th Edition. Merrill/Prentice Hall:University of California,
USA.
Lang, A. (2014). Dynamic human-centered communication systems theory. Information
Society, 30(1), 60-70. doi:10.1080/01972243.2013.856364
Kervin, L., & Mantei J. (2010). Supporting educators with the inclusion of technology within
literacy classrooms: A framework for "action". Journal of Technology Integration in
the Classroom, 2(3), 43–54.
Madianou, M. (2012). News as a looking glass: shame and the symbolic power of mediation.
International Journal of Cultural Studies, 15(1), 3–16.
Madianou, M., & Miller D. (2012). Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in
interpersonal communication. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16(2), 169-187
Pérez, N. C. (2016). Effects of tasks on spoken interaction and motivation in English
language learners. Gist Education and Learning Research Journal, 13, 34-55.
Schleicher, A. (2006). Education for Colombia: Colombian ministry of national education. In
Reviews of National Policies for Education. OECD publishing. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1787/19900198
Seels, B., & Richey R. (1994). Defining a field: A case study of the development of the 1994
definition of instructional technology. Educational Media technology, 210, 2-17.
Simonds, C. J., Buckrop J., Remond M., & Quianthay D. (2012). Revised resolution on the role
of communication in general education. Retrieved from http://www.natcom.org.
Thompson, P. (2013). The digital natives as learners: Technology use patterns and
approaches to learning. Computers & Education, 65, 12-33.

You might also like