Research Compilation On Pigafetta's Account
Research Compilation On Pigafetta's Account
Research Compilation On Pigafetta's Account
sources; the identification of historical importance of the text; and the examination of the
author’s main argument and point of view. First among the documents, the Pigafetta’s account
on the first voyage around the world. A corrected version of the Battle of Mactan was also retold
in the account where- it was an attempt of the Filipinos to repulse a foreign invader.
It is the first recorded document concerning the language. Pigafetta was one of the 18 men
who made the complete trip, returning to Spain in 1522, under the command of Juan Sebastián
Elcano, out of the approximately 240 who set out three years earlier. These men completed the
first circumnavigation of the world.
Pigafetta was the diarist of the expedition of the Portuguese Ferdinand Magellan (who at that
time served the Spanish crown). ... Unfortunately for us, Pigafetta remains the sole reliable
source of that historic battle.
Pigafetta’s work is important not only as a source of information about the voyage itself,
but also includes an early Western description of the people and languages of the
Philippines. Of the approximately 240 men who set out with Magellan, Pigafetta was one of
only 18 who returned to Spain. Magellan himself was killed, on April 27, 1521, in a battle on
Mactan Island, the Philippines, which Pigafetta witnessed and recounts in this work.
Ø Pigafetta’s account is the longest and most comprehensive of the four known primary sources
Ø Pigafetta’s travelogue contributed immensely to the Philippine historiography, providing us a
glimpse of the political, economic and social conditions of the islands in the Visayan region
during the 16th century.
Ø With the help of Magellan’s slave/Interpreter, Enrique de Malacca, he got all the information,
including the account of Magellan’s death in the Battle of Mactan
Pigafetta’s eyewitness account is the “most detailed and only surviving account” of this critical
event in Philippine history,
“In history, there is still this passion for primary sources. If you really want to be a credible
historian, you should not be [content] with translations and secondary accounts,” said Escalante.
Bringing home the Pigafetta manuscripts is one way to promote the study of history, especially
that chapter in the Philippines’ shrouded in mystery.
That’s why written accounts by foreigners who visited the Philippines in that epoch are valuable,
and the Pigafetta manuscripts all the more so, for their level of detail and the historic events they
describe.
For instance, Pigafetta narrates that the first Easter Day Mass was celebrated in the Philippines in
a place called Limasawa. Despite a law in the 1960s declaring that this happened in Limasawa
Island, Southern Leyte, there remain adherents to the theory that the site was Butuan, in a
swampy area that had been called Mazaua.
Pigafetta also relates the planting of a cross in a mountain in Limasawa, and days later, in Cebu,
the bequeathal of a statue of the baby Jesus to Juana, wife of Bisaya ruler Raja Humabon.
In a simple response, Antonio Pigafetta’s account of the Philippines was the first detailed and
descriptive observation made of the people, their lives and languages along with the geographical
information he collected and wrote about on the voyage.
Some of the information that Pigafetta provided is used by many Filipino Quora contributors in
defining the history of the Philippines prior to the Spanish settlements.
It also puts to rest the myth of who actually killed Magellan and it wasn’t done by a 70 plus years
old man.