Phyllodes Tumors of The Breast UpToDate
Phyllodes Tumors of The Breast UpToDate
Phyllodes Tumors of The Breast UpToDate
All topics are updated as new evidence becomes available and our peer review process is complete.
Literature review current through: Dec 2020. | This topic last updated: May 09, 2019.
INTRODUCTION
Phyllodes tumors are uncommon fibroepithelial breast tumors that are capable of a diverse
range of biologic behaviors. In their least aggressive form, phyllodes tumors behave like benign
fibroadenomas, although with a propensity to recur locally following excision without wide
margins. At the other end of the spectrum, other phyllodes tumors can metastasize distantly,
sometimes degenerating histologically into sarcomatous lesions that lack an epithelial
component [1,2].
The term "phyllodes," which means leaf-like, describes the typical papillary projections that are
seen on pathologic examination. Although they were originally called "cystosarcoma phyllodes"
by Johannes Müller in 1838 [2], phyllodes tumors only occasionally have cystic components and
are not true sarcomas by either cellular origin or biologic behavior. The terminology has since
evolved, with over 60 synonyms having been applied to this entity before the term "phyllodes
tumors" was adopted by the World Health Organization [3,4].
The clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of breast phyllodes tumors are
discussed in this topic. Other benign (eg, fibroadenoma) or malignant lesions of the breast are
discussed elsewhere. (See "Overview of benign breast disease" and "Clinical features, diagnosis,
and staging of newly diagnosed breast cancer" and "Overview of the treatment of newly
diagnosed, invasive, non-metastatic breast cancer".)
Phyllodes tumors account for less than 1 percent of all breast neoplasms [4,5]. Given their rarity,
epidemiologic data are scant. In a study from Los Angeles county over a 17 year period, the
average annual incidence rate of malignant phyllodes tumors was 2.1 per million women, and
the incidence was higher in Latina whites than in non-Latina whites, Asians, and African
Americans [6].
The vast majority of phyllodes tumors occur in women, with a median age of presentation of 42
to 45 years (range 10 to 82 years) [3,6-8]. Higher-grade tumors are more common in older
patients [9]. In men, phyllodes tumors usually occur in association with gynecomastia [3].
Phyllodes tumors have been associated with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, a rare autosomal dominant
condition that is characterized by the development of multiple tumors [10]. No other etiologic or
predisposing factors have been linked to phyllodes tumors. (See "Overview of hereditary breast
and ovarian cancer syndromes associated with genes other than BRCA1/2" and "Li-Fraumeni
syndrome".)
CLINICAL PRESENTATION
On examination, most patients have a smooth, multinodular, well-defined, firm mass that is
mobile and painless [2,7]. Tumor size is variable, ranging from 1 to 41 cm (average 4 to 7 cm)
[4,8]. Shiny, stretched, and attenuated skin may be seen overlying a large tumor [2]. Nipple
retraction, ulceration, chest wall fixation, and bilateral diseases are rare but have been
described for phyllodes tumors [2,11].
Phyllodes tumors may grow slowly or rapidly or exhibit a biphasic growth pattern. As they grow
larger, phyllodes tumors can form a visible mass that distorts the contour of the breast or even
cause pressure necrosis of the overlying skin.
DIAGNOSTIC EVALUATION
Phyllodes tumors should be suspected when a patient presents with a large (>3 cm), rapidly
growing breast mass that is usually palpable. Although imaging features of a phyllodes tumor
can be suggestive of fibroadenoma, the large size and history of rapid growth indicate
otherwise. Breast masses suspicious for a phyllodes tumor should undergo biopsy or surgical
excision and are usually diagnosed on pathology.
Malignant phyllodes tumors are seen as well-circumscribed tumors with irregular walls, high
signal intensity on T1-weighted images, and low signal intensity on T2-weighted images [16].
Cystic change may be seen as well. A rapid enhancement pattern is seen more commonly with
benign rather than malignant phyllodes tumors, which is the opposite of the pattern seen with
adenocarcinomas of the breast [16,17].
Biopsy — Breast lesions suspicious for phyllodes tumors should undergo core biopsy, which is
typically diagnostic. Compared with core biopsy, fine needle aspiration (FNA) is less accurate. If
Fine needle aspiration — In general, FNA has been associated with a high false negative
rate and low overall accuracy for the diagnosis of phyllodes tumors [18]. Some experts,
however, advocated paying special attention to three major cytological features (fibromyxoid
stromal fragments with spindle nuclei, fibroblastic pavements, and spindle cells of fibroblastic
nature) to improve the accuracy of FNA [19].
Core needle biopsy — On core needle biopsy, additional features can help distinguish
phyllodes tumors from fibroadenomas. Such features include increased cellularity, mitosis,
stromal overgrowth, and fragmentation (stroma with epithelium at one or both ends of the
fragment). (See 'Histologic' below.)
Pathology
Benign tumors are characterized by increased stromal cellularity with mild-to-moderate cellular
atypia, circumscribed tumor margins and low mitotic rate (less than 4 mitoses per 10 high-
power fields), and lack of stromal overgrowth.
Borderline tumors have a greater degree of stromal cellularity and atypia, a mitotic rate of 4 to
9 mitoses per 10 high-power fields, microscopic infiltrative borders, and lack of stromal
overgrowth.
Malignant tumors are characterized by marked stromal cellularity and atypia, infiltrative
margins, high mitotic rate (more than 10 mitoses per 10 high-power fields), and the presence of
stromal overgrowth [4,7,26-28].
Of the four histologic features listed above, stromal overgrowth is most consistently associated
with aggressive (metastatic) behavior [1,29]. Most clinically malignant/metastatic phyllodes
tumors have had overgrowth of one or several sarcomatous elements. These elements include
liposarcoma, rhabdosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, and undifferentiated/unclassified sarcoma
[30,31].
Although the exact figures vary, more than 50 percent of phyllodes tumors are classified as
benign and 25 percent as malignant in most large studies [1,2,34,35].
Histologic grades of phyllodes tumors have clinical implications. Patients with benign tumors
generally have better local control and disease-free survival compared with those with
borderline or malignant tumors [36]. Benign and borderline phyllodes tumors rarely recur
following wide excision [37].
Clinical behaviors of phyllodes tumors can also be influenced by factors other than histologic
grades [1,8]. In a study of 605 cases of phyllodes tumors, stromal atypia, mitoses, overgrowth,
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/phyllodes-tumors-of-the-breast/print?search=phylloid phyllodes tumor of the breast&source=search_result&selectedTitle=1~9&… 5/22
05/01/2021 Phyllodes tumors of the breast - UpToDate
and surgical margin status (defined as complete, focally involved, and diffusely involved) were
shown to be independent predictors of recurrence, with surgical margin status being the most
important. A nomogram was developed by the use of a mathematical formula that could be
applied to an individual patient to guide clinical decision making [38].
Molecular — In phyllodes tumors, the status of tumor markers, such as p53, Ki-67,
epidermal growth factor receptors, c-kit, and platelet-derived growth factor, has failed to predict
outcomes [33]. The expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors is common in the
epithelial but not the stromal component of phyllodes tumors [11].
On the molecular level, genetic heterogeneity has been observed intratumorally, with increasing
numbers of aberrations coinciding with increased malignant potential [39]. Some believe that
phyllodes tumors arise from benign epithelial fibroadenomas due to their close histologic
resemblance and molecular similarities [2,3,40]. As an example, molecular analysis showed high
frequencies of MED12 (mediator complex subunit 12) mutations in both fibroadenomas and
phyllodes tumors [41]. In one study of 112 breast phyllodes tumors, MED12 mutations were
detected in 65, 66, and 43 percent of benign, borderline, and malignant phyllodes tumors,
respectively [42]. In another study using targeted next-generation sequencing, malignant
phyllodes tumors were shown to harbor additional mutations in key tumor suppressor genes
and oncogenes, such as TP53, RB1, NF1, and CAN [43]. Although controversial, some thought
that the acquisition of additional mutations explains the aggressive biological behaviors of
malignant phyllodes tumors.
TREATMENT
Phyllodes tumors should be completely excised; axillary lymph node dissection is not necessary.
Adjuvant radiation therapy may benefit borderline or malignant, but not benign, tumors.
Chemotherapy is reserved for highly selected patients with large, high-risk, or recurrent
malignant phyllodes tumors. Hormonal therapy is not used to treat phyllodes tumors. Given the
rarity of the disease, treatment principles are based mainly on retrospective series and case
reports.
Surgical resection
Breast surgery — A complete surgical excision is the standard of care for phyllodes tumors.
Phyllodes tumors should be completely excised because most [37,44-46], but not all [47],
studies have associated positive margins with unacceptably high local recurrence rates. In a
multivariate survival analysis that included 172 patients with phyllodes tumors, a positive
surgical margin was associated with an almost fourfold higher risk of a tumor-related event
such as local recurrence or distant disease (hazard ratio [HR] 3.9, 95% CI 1.1-14.3) [45].
Positive margins often occur when phyllodes tumors are misdiagnosed as fibroadenomas and
either enucleated or locally excised without attention to margins [4,5,12,13,24,36,37,46,48-51]. A
positive margin requires re-excision.
The minimal acceptable margin beyond "clear," however, is controversial and also depends on
tumor grade [12,44,45,52]. While we aim for a 1 cm margin for phyllodes tumors, we will accept
a narrower but clear margin for benign, but not borderline or malignant, phyllodes tumors:
● Emerging evidence suggests that a positive surgical margin of benign phyllodes tumors
may not be related to local recurrence [53]. A 2019 meta-analysis of 54 observational
studies also found that a positive margin only correlated with a higher local recurrence risk
for malignant, but not for benign and borderline, phyllodes tumors [28]. Consequently, it
has become controversial whether a negative margin should be strictly obtained for a
benign phyllodes tumor [54,55]. Regardless of the ongoing debate, however, it appears safe
to accept a clear, but narrower than 1 cm, margin rather than mandating re-excision for
benign phyllodes tumors.
● Surgical margins of ≥1 cm have been associated with a lower local recurrence rate in
borderline and malignant phyllodes [1,4,49]. In a retrospective review of 48 women with
high-grade malignant phyllodes tumors, 10 patients were treated with local excision
(margins <1 cm), 14 with wide local excision (margins ≥1 cm), and 24 with mastectomy [46].
At a median follow-up of nine years, the local recurrence rate was higher after local excision
with narrow margins than after wide local excision (60 versus 28 percent). Local recurrence
and cancer-specific survival were related to tumor size and excision margins. The average
tumor size was 7.8 cm in this study.
As long as adequate margins can be achieved, breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy are
equally effective in treating malignant phyllodes tumors [1,4,12,56]. In a study of 821 women
with malignant phyllodes tumors from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)
database, mastectomy and wide local excision were performed in 52 and 48 percent,
respectively [12]. Compared with mastectomy, wide local excision was associated with
equivalent or improved cause-specific survival regardless of tumor size.
Mastectomy is generally not indicated for benign phyllodes unless negative margins cannot be
achieved and/or if the tumor is so large that breast-conserving surgery would result in
suboptimal cosmetic outcomes.
Despite best surgical efforts, phyllodes tumors are known to recur locally with rates that vary
with tumor grade. In earlier reports, benign, borderline, and malignant phyllodes tumors had
local recurrence rates of 8, 21, and 36 percent, respectively [37,49]. More contemporary series
reported lower rates of local recurrence [57]. As an example, a 2019 meta-analysis of 54
retrospective studies reported an overall local recurrence rate of 12 percent (95% CI 10-14), and
pooled local recurrence rates of 8, 13, and 18 percent for benign, borderline, and malignant
tumors, respectively [28]. Recurrent phyllodes tumors require surgical and/or radiation therapy
as discussed below. (See 'Local recurrence' below.)
● We do not suggest adjuvant RT for patients with benign phyllodes tumors that are widely
excised.
Adjuvant RT has been shown to reduce local recurrence of borderline or malignant phyllodes
tumors [26,27,35,36,49,58,59]. In a meta-analysis of eight observational studies, adjuvant RT
clearly reduced local recurrences of borderline or malignant phyllodes tumors after breast-
conserving surgery (HR 0.31, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.72) but had no effect on overall or disease-free
survival [60]. The effect of adjuvant RT on local recurrences after mastectomy was less
pronounced (HR 0.68, 95% CI -0.28 to 1.64).
In clinical practice, the utilization of adjuvant RT for phyllodes tumors appears to be modest. In
a retrospective review of the National Cancer Database that included 3120 patients with
malignant phyllodes tumors, only 14 percent received adjuvant RT [61]. Patients were more
likely to receive radiation therapy if they were diagnosed later in the study, were 50 to 59 years
old, had tumors >10 cm, or had lymph nodes removed. In adjusted models, adjuvant radiation
reduced local recurrence but did not impact survival after a median follow-up of 53 months.
There have been no randomized studies of adjuvant chemotherapy specifically for phyllodes
tumors. In a small observational study, 28 patients with malignant phyllodes tumors were
treated with either adjuvant doxorubicin plus dacarbazine or observation alone after surgical
resection based upon patient preference [62]. Although the five-year relapse-free survival was
not different between the two groups, the study was retrospective, nonrandomized, and
underpowered. It did not utilize ifosfamide in combination with doxorubicin (which is superior
to dacarbazine plus doxorubicin in other soft tissue sarcomas).
Based on experience and limited data, we recommend adjuvant chemotherapy only to a small
minority of patients with high-risk (>10 cm) or recurrent malignant phyllodes tumors who have
excellent functional status and minimal comorbidities, and only after a thorough discussion
about the risks, benefits, and controversial nature of such treatment. When systemic
chemotherapy is indicated, malignant phyllodes tumors should be treated according to
protocols designed for soft tissue sarcoma, rather than breast cancers. (See "Systemic
treatment of metastatic soft tissue sarcoma".)
For patients with metastatic disease, systemic treatments used are the same as those used for
soft tissue sarcoma but often have limited or short-lived benefit. Given the paucity of efficacious
agents in the metastatic setting, patients should be referred for investigational treatments on
clinical trials.
POST-TREATMENT SURVEILLANCE
Given the small number of patients with malignant phyllodes tumors of the breast, there are no
evidence-based recommendations for surveillance after therapy [66,67]. The following follow-up
guidelines are adapted from those for soft tissue sarcoma (see "Overview of multimodality
treatment for primary soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities and chest wall", section on
'Posttreatment cancer surveillance'):
● Since most recurrences occur in the first two years after treatment [49], we perform a
history and physical examination every six months for the first two years, then annually.
(See 'Local recurrence' below.)
● Patients who have not had mastectomy should resume surveillance with mammography
annually. If suspicious lesions are found on mammography or breast examination, further
imaging and/or biopsy may be required. (See 'Imaging' above.)
● Patients with large (≥5 cm) or malignant phyllodes tumors are at higher risk of developing
metastatic disease. For such patients, surveillance may be performed more frequently and
with chest radiograph or chest computed tomography (CT) as recommended by the
National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) on soft tissue sarcomas [68]. (See
'Metastatic disease' below.)
Local recurrence — When phyllodes tumors recur, they typically recur locally within two years
of the initial excision [4,11]. Some series have found that the time to local recurrence was
shorter for malignant than for benign or borderline tumors [4,33,37].
Although recurrences typically have the same grade as the original tumors, there have been
several case reports of benign tumors transforming into malignant ones upon recurrence
[1,8,35,69]. In one series of 293 phyllodes tumors, for example, six benign tumors recurred
locally as malignant tumors [8]. A systematic review of 54 retrospective studies reported some
26 percent (range 13 to 38) of benign and 21 percent (8 to 33 percent) of borderline tumors that
recurred underwent upgrade [28].
Recurrent phyllodes tumors are treated with surgery and/or radiation, with the goal of avoiding
re-recurrence and the need for additional surgical intervention. Resectable recurrent disease is
treated with either re-excision with wide margins or mastectomy, followed by radiation therapy
(RT). Unresectable recurrences are treated with palliative radiation alone [13]. (See 'Surgical
resection' above and 'Radiation therapy' above.)
Phyllodes tumors metastasize most often to the lungs. Tumors that metastasize are typically
large (≥5 cm) or have malignant histologic features (see 'Histologic' above):
● In a series of 101 patients, eight developed distant metastases, seven of whom had
malignant tumors and one benign [1]. All tumors had stromal overgrowth, and six were ≥5
cm in size.
● In another retrospective review of 293 phyllodes tumors treated between 1954 and 2005,
five patients developed distant disease. All tumors that metastasized had one or more
malignant histologic features such as infiltrative borders, marked stromal overgrowth,
marked stromal cellularity, high mitotic count, and necrosis and were ≥7 cm in size [8].
As with other soft tissue sarcomas, pulmonary metastases of phyllodes tumors should be
resected when technically feasible. (See "Surgical treatment and other localized therapy for
metastatic soft tissue sarcoma".)
For patients with metastatic disease, chemotherapy may be administered based upon
treatment guidelines for soft tissue sarcomas [4,71]. The choices of chemotherapeutic agents
for this purpose are discussed elsewhere. (See "Systemic treatment of metastatic soft tissue
sarcoma".)
SURVIVAL
The majority of patients with benign and borderline phyllodes tumors are cured by surgery. The
survival rate for malignant phyllodes tumors is approximately 60 to 80 percent at five years
[1,12,48].
● The impact of histology on survival was explored in the SArcoma and PHYllode
Retrospective (SAPHYR) Study, a retrospective study of 70 patients with primary breast
sarcomas and phyllodes tumors treated from 1966 to 2004 [48]. The overall three-year
survival rate for combined benign and borderline tumors was 100 percent. The overall
three-year survival rate for malignant phyllodes tumors was 54 percent, similar to that of
nonangiosarcoma primary breast sarcomas (60 percent).
● Similarly, in a retrospective study of 101 patients treated between 1944 and 1998, the five-
year overall survival rate for patients with benign/borderline and malignant tumors was 91
Links to society and government-sponsored guidelines from selected countries and regions
around the world are provided separately. (See "Society guideline links: Evaluation of breast
problems".)
● Phyllodes tumors are uncommon fibroepithelial breast tumors that are capable of a diverse
range of biologic behaviors. Most phyllodes tumors present as smooth, multinodular,
painless breast lumps. While they can be confused for fibroadenomas, phyllodes tumors
typically have larger sizes and grow rapidly. Twenty percent of phyllodes tumors present as
abnormal findings on screening mammography. (See 'Introduction' above and 'Clinical
presentation' above.)
● Breast masses suspicious for phyllodes tumors should undergo core biopsy; fine needle
aspiration is less accurate. If the core biopsy results are indeterminate or if there is clinical-
pathologic discordance, an excisional biopsy should be performed. (See 'Biopsy' above.)
● For phyllodes tumors of the breast, we recommend wide excision with a margin of at least 1
cm, rather than excision with narrower margins or enucleation alone (Grade 1B). Positive
margins require re-excision. We will accept a narrower but clear margin for benign, but not
borderline or malignant, tumors. As long as adequate margins can be achieved, phyllodes
tumors can often be treated with breast-conserving surgery (partial mastectomy).
Mastectomy is only required if adequate margins cannot be achieved with breast-
conserving surgery.
● We recommend not performing axillary dissection for phyllodes tumors (Grade 1C). Axillary
lymph node involvement is rare, even with malignant tumors. (See 'Surgical resection'
above.)
● For benign phyllodes tumors that are completely excised, we recommend not performing
adjuvant radiotherapy (Grade 1C). For borderline or malignant phyllodes tumors, we
suggest performing adjuvant radiotherapy, even after a complete excision (Grade 2C).
Radiation therapy substantially reduces the local recurrence rates of these tumors. (See
'Radiation therapy' above.)
● We suggest that adjuvant chemotherapy be reserved for highly selected patients with large,
high-risk, or recurrent malignant phyllodes tumors (Grade 2C). Chemotherapeutic agents
should be chosen based upon treatment guidelines for soft tissue sarcomas, rather than
breast cancer. (See 'Chemotherapy' above.)
● We recommend not using hormonal therapy for phyllodes tumors (Grade 1C). (See
'Treatment' above.)
● We perform a history and physical examination every six months for two years after the
initial treatment of phyllodes tumors, then annually. Patients at higher risk for developing
metastatic diseases (≥5 cm or malignant tumors) may require more frequent surveillance
with chest radiograph or chest computed tomography (CT) per guidelines for soft tissue
sarcoma. (See 'Post-treatment surveillance' above.)
● Locally recurrent phyllodes tumors that are resectable should undergo wide re-excision
followed by adjuvant radiotherapy. Unresectable recurrences are palliated with radiation
therapy. Resectable pulmonary metastasis should be resected; unresectable metastatic
phyllodes tumors are palliated with chemotherapy according to soft tissue sarcoma
protocols. (See 'Recurrent and metastatic diseases' above.)
● The majority of patients with benign and borderline phyllodes tumors are cured by surgery.
The survival rate for malignant phyllodes tumors is approximately 60 to 80 percent at five
years. (See 'Survival' above.)
REFERENCES
1. Chaney AW, Pollack A, McNeese MD, et al. Primary treatment of cystosarcoma phyllodes of
the breast. Cancer 2000; 89:1502.
2. Calhoun K, Allison KH, Kim JN, et al.. Phyllodes tumors. In: Diseases of the breast, Harris J, L
ippman ME, Morrow M, Osborne KC (Eds), Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2014.
3. Tavassoli FA, Devilee P. and genetics of tumours of the breast and female genital organs. I
n: World Health Organization Classification of Tumours, IARC Press, Lyons 2003. p.99.
4. Reinfuss M, Mituś J, Duda K, et al. The treatment and prognosis of patients with phyllodes
tumor of the breast: an analysis of 170 cases. Cancer 1996; 77:910.
5. Geisler DP, Boyle MJ, Malnar KF, et al. Phyllodes tumors of the breast: a review of 32 cases.
Am Surg 2000; 66:360.
8. Barrio AV, Clark BD, Goldberg JI, et al. Clinicopathologic features and long-term outcomes
of 293 phyllodes tumors of the breast. Ann Surg Oncol 2007; 14:2961.
9. Karim RZ, Gerega SK, Yang YH, et al. Phyllodes tumours of the breast: a clinicopathological
analysis of 65 cases from a single institution. Breast 2009; 18:165.
10. Birch JM, Alston RD, McNally RJ, et al. Relative frequency and morphology of cancers in
carriers of germline TP53 mutations. Oncogene 2001; 20:4621.
11. Telli ML, Horst KC, Guardino AE, et al. Phyllodes tumors of the breast: natural history,
diagnosis, and treatment. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2007; 5:324.
12. Macdonald OK, Lee CM, Tward JD, et al. Malignant phyllodes tumor of the female breast:
association of primary therapy with cause-specific survival from the Surveillance,
Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. Cancer 2006; 107:2127.
13. Mangi AA, Smith BL, Gadd MA, et al. Surgical management of phyllodes tumors. Arch Surg
1999; 134:487.
14. Wurdinger S, Herzog AB, Fischer DR, et al. Differentiation of phyllodes breast tumors from
fibroadenomas on MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 185:1317.
15. Tan H, Zhang S, Liu H, et al. Imaging findings in phyllodes tumors of the breast. Eur J
Radiol 2012; 81:e62.
16. Yabuuchi H, Soeda H, Matsuo Y, et al. Phyllodes tumor of the breast: correlation between
MR findings and histologic grade. Radiology 2006; 241:702.
17. Farria DM, Gorczyca DP, Barsky SH, et al. Benign phyllodes tumor of the breast: MR
imaging features. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 167:187.
18. Jacklin RK, Ridgway PF, Ziprin P, et al. Optimising preoperative diagnosis in phyllodes
tumour of the breast. J Clin Pathol 2006; 59:454.
19. El Hag IA, Aodah A, Kollur SM, et al. Cytological clues in the distinction between phyllodes
tumor and fibroadenoma. Cancer Cytopathol 2010; 118:33.
20. Dillon MF, Quinn CM, McDermott EW, et al. Needle core biopsy in the diagnosis of
phyllodes neoplasm. Surgery 2006; 140:779.
21. Lee AH. Recent developments in the histological diagnosis of spindle cell carcinoma,
fibromatosis and phyllodes tumour of the breast. Histopathology 2008; 52:45.
22. Lee AH, Hodi Z, Ellis IO, Elston CW. Histological features useful in the distinction of
phyllodes tumour and fibroadenoma on needle core biopsy of the breast. Histopathology
2007; 51:336.
23. Tan BY, Acs G, Apple SK, et al. Phyllodes tumours of the breast: a consensus review.
Histopathology 2016; 68:5.
24. de Roos WK, Kaye P, Dent DM. Factors leading to local recurrence or death after surgical
resection of phyllodes tumours of the breast. Br J Surg 1999; 86:396.
25. Lakhani SR, Ellis IO, Schnitt SJ, et al. WHO Classification of Tumours of the Breast, 4th ed, W
orld Health Organization, 2012.
26. Hawkins RE, Schofield JB, Fisher C, et al. The clinical and histologic criteria that predict
metastases from cystosarcoma phyllodes. Cancer 1992; 69:141.
27. Fajdić J, Gotovac N, Hrgović Z, et al. Phyllodes tumors of the breast diagnostic and
therapeutic dilemmas. Onkologie 2007; 30:113.
28. Lu Y, Chen Y, Zhu L, et al. Local Recurrence of Benign, Borderline, and Malignant Phyllodes
Tumors of the Breast: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2019;
26:1263.
30. Powell CM, Rosen PP. Adipose differentiation in cystosarcoma phyllodes. A study of 14
cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1994; 18:720.
31. Guerrero MA, Ballard BR, Grau AM. Malignant phyllodes tumor of the breast: review of the
literature and case report of stromal overgrowth. Surg Oncol 2003; 12:27.
32. Fletcher CDM, Chibon F, Mertens F. Undifferentiated/unclassified sarcomas. In: WHO classif
iction of tumours of soft tissue and bone, 4th, Fletcher CDM, Bridge JA, Hogendoorn PCW,
Mertens F (Eds), IARC, Lyon 2013. p.236.
33. Carter BA, Page DL. Phyllodes tumor of the breast: local recurrence versus metastatic
capacity. Hum Pathol 2004; 35:1051.
34. Mituś JW, Blecharz P, Reinfuss M, et al. Changes in the clinical characteristics, treatment
options, and therapy outcomes in patients with phyllodes tumor of the breast during 55
years of experience. Med Sci Monit 2013; 19:1183.
35. Parker SJ, Harries SA. Phyllodes tumours. Postgrad Med J 2001; 77:428.
36. Belkacémi Y, Bousquet G, Marsiglia H, et al. Phyllodes tumor of the breast. Int J Radiat
Oncol Biol Phys 2008; 70:492.
37. Barth RJ Jr. Histologic features predict local recurrence after breast conserving therapy of
phyllodes tumors. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1999; 57:291.
38. Tan PH, Thike AA, Tan WJ, et al. Predicting clinical behaviour of breast phyllodes tumours: a
nomogram based on histological criteria and surgical margins. J Clin Pathol 2012; 65:69.
39. Karim RZ, O'Toole SA, Scolyer RA, et al. Recent insights into the molecular pathogenesis of
mammary phyllodes tumours. J Clin Pathol 2013; 66:496.
40. Kuijper A, Buerger H, Simon R, et al. Analysis of the progression of fibroepithelial tumours
of the breast by PCR-based clonality assay. J Pathol 2002; 197:575.
41. Tan J, Ong CK, Lim WK, et al. Genomic landscapes of breast fibroepithelial tumors. Nat
Genet 2015; 47:1341.
42. Ng CC, Tan J, Ong CK, et al. MED12 is frequently mutated in breast phyllodes tumours: a
study of 112 cases. J Clin Pathol 2015; 68:685.
43. Cani AK, Hovelson DH, McDaniel AS, et al. Next-Gen Sequencing Exposes Frequent MED12
Mutations and Actionable Therapeutic Targets in Phyllodes Tumors. Mol Cancer Res 2015;
13:613.
44. Jang JH, Choi MY, Lee SK, et al. Clinicopathologic risk factors for the local recurrence of
phyllodes tumors of the breast. Ann Surg Oncol 2012; 19:2612.
45. Spitaleri G, Toesca A, Botteri E, et al. Breast phyllodes tumor: a review of literature and a
single center retrospective series analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2013; 88:427.
46. Kapiris I, Nasiri N, A'Hern R, et al. Outcome and predictive factors of local recurrence and
distant metastases following primary surgical treatment of high-grade malignant
phyllodes tumours of the breast. Eur J Surg Oncol 2001; 27:723.
47. Yom CK, Han W, Kim SW, et al. Reappraisal of conventional risk stratification for local
recurrence based on clinical outcomes in 285 resected phyllodes tumors of the breast. Ann
Surg Oncol 2015; 22:2912.
48. Confavreux C, Lurkin A, Mitton N, et al. Sarcomas and malignant phyllodes tumours of the
breast--a retrospective study. Eur J Cancer 2006; 42:2715.
49. Barth RJ Jr, Wells WA, Mitchell SE, Cole BF. A prospective, multi-institutional study of
adjuvant radiotherapy after resection of malignant phyllodes tumors. Ann Surg Oncol
2009; 16:2288.
50. Chen WH, Cheng SP, Tzen CY, et al. Surgical treatment of phyllodes tumors of the breast:
retrospective review of 172 cases. J Surg Oncol 2005; 91:185.
51. Bhargav PR, Mishra A, Agarwal G, et al. Phyllodes tumour of the breast: clinicopathological
analysis of recurrent vs. non-recurrent cases. Asian J Surg 2009; 32:224.
52. Moutte A, Chopin N, Faure C, et al. Surgical Management of Benign and Borderline
Phyllodes Tumors of the Breast. Breast J 2016; 22:547.
53. Ouyang Q, Li S, Tan C, et al. Benign Phyllodes Tumor of the Breast Diagnosed After
Ultrasound-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy: Surgical Excision or Wait-and-Watch? Ann
Surg Oncol 2016; 23:1129.
54. Moo TA, Alabdulkareem H, Tam A, et al. Association Between Recurrence and Re-Excision
for Close and Positive Margins Versus Observation in Patients with Benign Phyllodes
Tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 2017; 24:3088.
55. Cowan ML, Argani P, Cimino-Mathews A. Benign and low-grade fibroepithelial neoplasms
of the breast have low recurrence rate after positive surgical margins. Mod Pathol 2016;
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/phyllodes-tumors-of-the-breast/print?search=phylloid phyllodes tumor of the breast&source=search_result&selectedTitle=1~9… 17/22
05/01/2021 Phyllodes tumors of the breast - UpToDate
29:259.
56. Onkendi EO, Jimenez RE, Spears GM, et al. Surgical treatment of borderline and malignant
phyllodes tumors: the effect of the extent of resection and tumor characteristics on patient
outcome. Ann Surg Oncol 2014; 21:3304.
57. Borhani-Khomani K, Talman ML, Kroman N, Tvedskov TF. Risk of Local Recurrence of
Benign and Borderline Phyllodes Tumors: A Danish Population-Based Retrospective Study.
Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 23:1543.
59. Pezner RD, Schultheiss TE, Paz IB. Malignant phyllodes tumor of the breast: local control
rates with surgery alone. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008; 71:710.
60. Zeng S, Zhang X, Yang D, et al. Effects of adjuvant radiotherapy on borderline and
malignant phyllodes tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Mol Clin Oncol 2015;
3:663.
61. Gnerlich JL, Williams RT, Yao K, et al. Utilization of radiotherapy for malignant phyllodes
tumors: analysis of the National Cancer Data Base, 1998-2009. Ann Surg Oncol 2014;
21:1222.
63. Burton GV, Hart LL, Leight GS Jr, et al. Cystosarcoma phyllodes. Effective therapy with
cisplatin and etoposide chemotherapy. Cancer 1989; 63:2088.
64. Sapino A, Bosco M, Cassoni P, et al. Estrogen receptor-beta is expressed in stromal cells of
fibroadenoma and phyllodes tumors of the breast. Mod Pathol 2006; 19:599.
65. Tse GM, Lee CS, Kung FY, et al. Hormonal receptors expression in epithelial cells of
mammary phyllodes tumors correlates with pathologic grade of the tumor: a multicenter
study of 143 cases. Am J Clin Pathol 2002; 118:522.
66. Patel SR, Zagars GK, Pisters PW. The follow-up of adult soft-tissue sarcomas. Semin Oncol
2003; 30:413.
67. Grabowski J, Salzstein SL, Sadler GR, Blair SL. Malignant phyllodes tumors: a review of 752
cases. Am Surg 2007; 73:967.
68. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). NCCN Clinical practice guidelines in onc
ology (NCCN Guidelines). Soft Tissue Sarcoma. Version 2.2016. Available at: www.nccn.org
(Accessed on February 22, 2016).
69. Allen R, Nixon D, York M, Coleman J. Successful chemotherapy for cystosarcoma phyllodes
in a young woman. Arch Intern Med 1985; 145:1127.
70. Kessinger A, Foley JF, Lemon HM, Miller DM. Metastatic cystosarcoma phyllodes: a case
report and review of the literature. J Surg Oncol 1972; 4:131.
71. Hawkins RE, Schofield JB, Wiltshaw E, et al. Ifosfamide is an active drug for chemotherapy
of metastatic cystosarcoma phyllodes. Cancer 1992; 69:2271.
GRAPHICS
Contributor Disclosures
Ana M Grau, MD, FACS Nothing to disclose A Bapsi Chakravarthy, MD, FASTRO Nothing to
disclose Rashmi Chugh, MD Nothing to disclose Lori J Pierce, MD Nothing to disclose Daniel F Hayes,
MD Patent Holder: Immunicon Corporation [Inventor]; University of Michigan [Inventor]; University of
Michigan [Inventor]. Grant/Research/Clinical Trial Support: Menarini Silicon Biosystems, LLC [Breast
cancer]; Pfizer [Breast cancer]; AstraZeneca [Breast cancer]; Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc [Breast
cancer]. Consultant/Advisory Boards: Cepheid [Breast cancer]; Freenome, Inc [Breast cancer]; Artiman
Ventures [Breast cancer]; CVS Caremark [Breast cancer expert panel]; Agendia, Inc [Breast cancer]; Lexent
Bio [Biomarkers]; EPIC Sciences, Inc [Liquid biopsies]; Salutogenic Innovations, LLC [Biomarkers]. Other
Financial Interest: Royalties from licensing of patent above to Menarini Silicon Biosystems [Breast cancer];
University of Michigan [Inventor]. Anees B Chagpar, MD, MSc, MA, MPH, MBA, FACS,
FRCS(C) Consultant/Advisory Boards: Protean BioDiagnostics [Breast cancer]. Wenliang Chen, MD,
PhD Nothing to disclose
Contributor disclosures are reviewed for conflicts of interest by the editorial group. When found, these are
addressed by vetting through a multi-level review process, and through requirements for references to be
provided to support the content. Appropriately referenced content is required of all authors and must
conform to UpToDate standards of evidence.