Leadership - Introduction Unit - 1: Change, Personal Responsibility & Integrity
Leadership - Introduction Unit - 1: Change, Personal Responsibility & Integrity
Leadership - Introduction Unit - 1: Change, Personal Responsibility & Integrity
UNIT -1
• Leadership is an influence relationship among leaders and followers who intend real changes and
outcomes that reflect their shared purposes.
• Leadership involves following key elements – INFLUENCE, FOLLOWERS, SHARED PURPOSE, INTENTION,
CHANGE, PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY & INTEGRITY.
➢ Influencing others to come together around a common vision
Multidirectional - operating in several directions.
Non-coercive - not using threats or force to achieve
In most organizations, superiors influence subordinates, but subordinates also influence
superiors.
➢ The people involved in the relationship want substantive changes—leadership involves creating
change, not maintaining the status quo.
➢ The changes sought are not dictated by leaders but reflect purposes that leaders and followers
share. Moreover, change is toward an outcome that both the leader and the followers want, a
desired future or shared purpose that motivates them toward this more preferable outcome.
➢ Leadership occurs among people; it is not something done to people. Since leadership involves
people, there must be followers.
➢ Intention means that people—leader and followers—are actively involved in the pursuit of
change. Each person takes personal responsibility to achieve the desired future.
• Reciprocal in nature
• Involves creating change
• Qualities required for effective leadership are also needed to be an effective follower
• Effective followers are:
– Self thinkers who do assignments with energy and enthusiasm
• Leaders are:
Committed to the common good rather than self-interest
Firm in their beliefs
NEW REALITY FOR LEADERS
1. From Stabilizer to Change Manager
• In the past, many leaders assumed that if they could just keep things running on a steady,
even keel, the organization would be successful.
• Yet today’s world is in constant motion, and nothing seems certain anymore.
• Today’s best leaders accept the inevitability of change and crisis and tap into them as
potential sources of energy and self-renewal. Adaptability is the main ideology in modern
world.
Management can be defined as the attainment of organizational goals in an effective and efficient
manner through planning, organizing, staffing, directing, and controlling organizational resources.
THEORIES OF LEADERSHIP
GREAT MAN THEORIES
• Leadership was conceptualized as a single Great Man who put everything together and influenced
others to follow along based on the strength of inherited traits, qualities, and abilities.
• [This is the granddaddy of leadership concepts. The earliest studies of leadership adopted the belief
that leaders (who were always thought of as male) were born with certain heroic leadership traits and
natural abilities of power and influence.]
TRAIT THEORIES
• Leaders had particular traits or characteristics that distinguished them from non-leaders and
contributed to success.
• [Beginning in the 1920s, researchers looked to see if leaders had particular traits or characteristics, such as
intelligence or energy, that distinguished them from non-leaders and contributed to success. It was thought
that if traits could be identified, leaders could be predicted, or perhaps even trained. Although research
failed to produce a list of traits that would always guarantee leadership success.]
BEHAVIOR THEORIES
• Leaders can analyse their situation and tailor their behaviour to improve leadership effectiveness
• Emphasized that leadership cannot be understood in a vacuum separate from various elements of the
group or organizational situation
INFLUENCE THEORIES
RELATIONAL THEORIES
• Focused on how leaders and followers interact and influence one another
• Transformational leadership and servant leadership are two important relational theories.
• Interpersonal relationships are seen as the most important facet of leadership effectiveness.
• Most organizations were small and were run by a single individual who many times hired workers
because they were friends or relatives, not necessarily because of their skills or qualifications.
• The size and simplicity of organizations and the stable nature of the environment made it easy for a
single person to understand the big picture, coordinate and control all activities, and keep things on
track.
• This is the era of Great Man leadership and the emphasis on personal traits of leaders. A leader was
conceptualized as a single hero who saw the big picture and how everything fit into a whole.
2. LEADERSHIP ERA 2
• Hierarchies of authority provide a sensible mechanism for supervision and control of workers, and
decisions once based on rules of thumb or tradition are replaced with precise procedures.
• Rise of the “rational manager” who directs and controls others using an impersonal approach.
• Employees aren’t expected to think for themselves; they are expected to do as they’re told, follow
rules and procedures, and accomplish specific tasks.
• The behaviour and contingency theories worked here because leaders could analyse their situation,
develop careful plans, and control what happened.
3. LEADERSHIP ERA 3
• The Japanese began to dominate world commerce with their ideas of team leadership and superb
quality.
• This is the era of the team leader and the change leader.
• Influence was important because of the need to change organizational structures and cultures.
• This era sees the emergence of knowledge work, an emphasis on horizontal collaboration, and a
shift to influence theories.
• Rather than conceiving of leadership as one person always being firmly “in charge,” leadership is
often shared among team leaders and members, shifting to the person with the most knowledge or
expertise
4. LEADERSHIP ERA 4
• Enter the digital, mobile, social-media age. It seems that everything is changing, and changing fast.
• Era 4 is the era of the agile leader who has made the leap to giving up control in the traditional
sense.
• Leaders emphasize relationships and networks, and they influence others through vision, meaning,
purpose, and values rather than management authority and control.
• They are constantly experimenting, learning, and changing, in both their personal and professional
lives, and they encourage the development and growth of others so that followers are expanding
their capabilities and contributing to innovation.
• Era 4 requires the full scope of leadership that goes far beyond rational management or even team
leadership.
New Ways of building business New ways of Investment
New ways of Growth New ways of Obsolescence
New Unicorns New breed of leaders
IMPLICATIONS
• The flow from Great Man leadership to rational management to team leadership to agile leadership
illustrates trends in the larger world. The implication is that leadership reflects the era or context of
the organization and society.
• Thus, Era 3 issues of diversity, team leadership, empowerment and horizontal relationships are
increasingly relevant.
• Many leaders are rapidly shifting into Era 4 leadership by focusing on change management and
facilitating a vision and values to encourage high performance, agility, and continuous adaptation in
a fast-shifting world.
• Agile leaders align themselves with new social technologies that can create networks of leaders
throughout the organization.
FATAL FLAWS THAT CAUSE DERAILMENT
1. PERFORMANCE PROBLEMS
• Failing to meet business objectives because of too much time promoting themselves and
playing politics, a failure to fulfil promises to superiors and stake holders. Integrity and
honesty issues.
2. PROBLEMS WITH RELATIONSHIPS
• Being insensitive, manipulative, critical, and not trustworthy in relationships with peers, direct
reports, customers, and others
3. DIFFICULTY CHANGING
• Not learning from feedback and mistakes to change old behaviours
• Defensive, unable to handle pressure, and unable to change management style to meet new
demands
4. DIFFICLTY BUILDING & LEADING TEAMS
• Poor management of direct reports
• Inability to get work done through others
• Not identifying and hiring the right people
5. TOO NARROW MANAGEMENT EXPERIENCE
• Inability to work effectively or collaborate outside their current function
• Failing to see big picture when moved into general management position over several
functions
LEARNING TO BE A LEADER
U2 - RESEARCH PERSPECTIVES ON INDIVIDUAL LEADERSHIP
THE TRAIT APPROACH
TRAITS: Distinguishing personal characteristics of a leader
Intelligence
Honesty
Self-confidence
Appearance
THE GREAT MAN APPROACH:
Sought to identify the traits leaders possessed that distinguished them from people
who were not leaders.
CHARACTERSTICS OF A LEADER
STRENGTHS
• Natura talent or ability that has been supported and reinforced with learned knowledge and
skills
• Acts as the central point of focus in life - Enables leadership to be based on:
Energy, Enthusiasm, Effectiveness
MATCHING STRENGTHS WITH ROLES
1. Operational role
• Vertically oriented leadership role
• Executive has direct control over people and resources and the position power to
accomplish results
• Leaders
Deliver results
Assertive
Analytical and knowledgeable
Riveted on changing knowledge to vision
2. Collaborative role
• Horizontal leadership role
• Leader worksbehind the scenes and uses personal power to influence others and get things
done
Proactive
Flexible
Manage ambiguity and uncertainty
3. Advisory role
• Provides advice, guidance, and support
• Responsible for developing broad organizational capabilities rather than accomplishing
specific business results
• Leaders
People skills
Ability to influence others
High levels of honesty and integrity
• The groups with autocratic leaders performed highly so long as the leader was present to
supervise them.
• However, group members were displeased with the close, autocratic style of leadership,
and feelings of hostility frequently arose.
• The performance of groups who were assigned democratic leaders was almost as good,
and these groups were characterized by positive feelings rather than hostility.
• In addition, under the democratic style of leadership, group members performed well even
when the leader was absent.
• The participative techniques and majority-rule decision making used by the democratic
leader trained and involved the group members so that they performed well with or without
the leader present.
LEADERSHIP CONTINUUM
•
Tannenbaum and Schmidt also suggested that the extent to which leaders should be boss-
cantered or subordinate-entered depended on organizational circumstances and that
leaders might adjust their behaviours to fit the circumstances.
• Leadership Continuum Theory is a contingency leadership theory developed by
Tannenbaum and Schmidt (1958).
• This theory is based on the idea that many classifications of leadership such as autocratic or
democratic are extremes and leadership practices in real life situations lye somewhere
between the two extremes.
• Tannenbaum and Schmidt (1958) propose the idea of leadership continuum and place
different variations of leadership practices along the continuum that move from autocratic
leadership style towards democratic.
• Specific leadership styles specified within the continuum include telling, selling, consulting,
and joining leadership styles.
• The Leadership Continuum Theory represents a just and valuable framework for analysing
leadership style.
• This is because the theory provides wider options for the classification of leadership style,
and thus has a high level of applicability in the real-life business management.
• Leadership Grid that builds on the work of the Ohio State and Michigan studies.
• Based on a week-long seminar, researchers rated leaders on a scale of one to nine
according to two criteria: the concern for people and the concern for production.
• The scores for these criteria are plotted on a grid with an axis corresponding to each
concern.
• Team management (9,9) is often considered the most effective style and is recommended
because organization members work together to accomplish tasks.
• Country club management (1,9) occurs when primary emphasis is given to people rather
than to work outputs.
• Authority-compliance management (9,1) occurs when efficiency in operations is the
dominant orientation.
• Middle-of-the-road management (5,5) reflects a moderate amount of concern for both
people and production.
• Impoverished management (1,1) means the absence of a leadership philosophy; leaders
exert little effort toward interpersonal relationships or work accomplishment.
Themes of Leader Behaviour Research
Individualized Leadership
Notion that a leader develops a unique relationship with each group member, determining:
• Leader's behaviour toward the member
• Member's response to the leader
Individualized leadership is based on the notion that a leader develops a unique relationship with each
subordinate or group member, which determines how the leader behaves toward the member and how the
member responds to the leader. In this view, leadership is a series of dyads, or a series of two-person
interactions. The dyadic view focuses on the concept of exchange, what each party gives to and receives
from the other.
C. Partnership Building
Leaders strive to develop a positive relationship with each subordinate
Contingency approaches - Seek to delineate the characteristics of situations and followers and
examine the leadership styles that can be used effectively
Focuses on the characteristics of followers as the important element of the situation &
consequently of determining effective leader behaviour
Subordinates vary in readiness level
• Relationship-oriented
Concerned with people
Establishes mutual trust and respect
Listens to employees’ needs
• Task-oriented
Primarily motivated by task accomplishment
• Measured with a least preferred co-worker (LPC) scale
Leadership style was measured with a questionnaire known as the least preferred co-
worker (LPC) scale.
The LPC scale has a set of 16 bipolar adjectives along an eight-point scale.
Examples of the bipolar adjectives used by Fiedler on the LPC scale follow: Open,
quarrelsome, efficient, self-assured, gloomy, guarded, harmonious, inefficient,
hesitant, cheerful
Situation
Leader Behaviour
a. Supportive leadership
• Shows concern for subordinates’ well-being and personal needs
• Leadership behaviour is open, friendly, and approachable, and the leader creates a team
climate and treats subordinates as equals
b. Directive leadership
• Tells subordinates exactly what they are supposed to do
• Leader behaviour includes planning, making schedules, setting performance goals and
behaviour standards, and stressing adherence to rules and regulations
c. Participative leadership
• Consults with subordinates about decisions
• Leader behaviour includes asking for opinions and suggestions, encouraging participation
in decision making, and meeting with subordinates in their workplaces
d. Achievement-oriented leadership
• Sets clear and challenging goals for subordinates
• Leader behaviour stresses high-quality performance and improvement over current
performance
Situational Contingencies
• Personal characteristics of group members
STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP means the ability to anticipate and envision the future, maintain
flexibility, think strategically, and work with others to initiate changes that will create a competitive
advantage for the organization in the future.
MISSION
1. DISCOVERY
• Many people are inspired by the opportunity to find or create something new.
• This type of purpose inspires people to see the adventure in their work and experience the
joy of a pioneering or entrepreneurial spirit.
• Discovery for its own sake can serve as a noble purpose.
It is the case for employees at Google, where people are energized by the psychic
rewards from working on intellectually stimulating & challenging technical problems.
Samsung Electronics reenergized the company by focusing employees on discovery
rather than imitation, transforming Samsung into a world-class innovator rather than a
manufacturer known for cheap, low-quality knockoffs.
Samsung invests heavily in research and development and even began threatening
Apple’s dominance in smartphones with the innovative features in its Galaxy phones.
The shift in purpose has led to amazing results at Samsung.
2. EXCELLENCE
• With this approach, rather than emphasizing discovery, leaders focus people on being the
best, both on an individual and an organizational level.
• Excellence is defined by the work itself rather than by customers.
• Indeed, organizations that pursue excellence would rather turn customers away than
compromise their quality.
• In companies with excellence as a guiding purpose, managers and employees are treated
as valuable resources and provided with support to perform at their peak.
• People are motivated by the opportunity to experience intrinsic rewards and personal
fulfilment.
Consider Apple, another company with excellence as a purpose. The company has
always built high-quality, cleverly designed computers, yet it holds less than 10 percent
of the personal computer market. Leaders would like to increase their share of the
market, but they aren’t willing to sacrifice their commitment to high quality and what they
consider superior technology
3. ALTRUISM
• Many non-profit organizations are based on a noble purpose of altruism because they
emphasize serving others, but businesses can use this approach as well.
• Even financial services companies, frequently perceived as being exploitative, can operate
based on a noble purpose of altruism.
• Any company that puts a high premium on customer service can be considered to fall in
this category as well.
• The basis of action for this type of purpose is to increase personal happiness.
• Most people feel good when they are doing something to help others or make their
communities or the world a better place.
For example, leaders at Dollar General stress the purpose of giving low-income people a
good deal, not just making sales and profits.
Team Bank’s mission and values clearly place it in the category of altruism as a guiding
purpose.
In addition to its business practices, the company provides financial literacy education to
high school students all across Germany and sponsors a lecture series on finance and
economics for a local university.
4. HEROISM
• The final category, heroism, means the company’s purpose is based on being strong,
aggressive, and effective.
• Companies with this basis of noble purpose often reflect almost an obsession with winning.
• People want to feel capable of being effective and producing results.
• Companies that remain successful over the long term have leaders who lead with a noble
purpose.
• A well-chosen noble purpose taps into the emotions and instincts of employees and
customers and can contribute to better morale, greater innovativeness, and higher
employee and organizational performance.
For examples, Bill Gates imbued Microsoft with a goal of putting the Windows operating
system into every personal computer.
At General Electric, former CEO Jack Welch wanted the company to strive to be number
one or number two in each industry in which it did business.
VISION
• A vision is an attractive, ideal future that is credible yet not readily attainable.
• It is an ambitious view of the future that everyone involved can believe in, one that can
realistically be achieved, yet one that offers a future that is better in important ways than
what now exists.
• Strong, inspiring visions have been associated with higher organizational performance and
greater employee motivation and satisfaction.
EXTRA
➢
EXTRA
➢ What Vision Does
• Vision Links the Present to the Future
• Vision Energizes People and Focuses Attention
• Vision Gives Meaning to Work
• Vision Establishes a Standard of Excellence and Integrity
➢ Common Themes of Vision
• Vision Has Broad Appeal
• Vision Deals with Change
• Vision Reflects High Ideals
• Vision Defines the Destination and the Journey
➢ Leaders use the following steps to co-create a vision:
• Target a vision for a desired future
• Co-create the vision
• Identify strengths
• Write a first draft
• Solicit feedback and create the final vision statement
• Share the vision widely
• Strategy: General plan of action that describes resource allocation and other activities for:
Dealing with the environment
Helping the organization attain its goals
• Leaders have to be clear on the organization’s purpose and vision before they can adopt an
effective strategy.
• Strategy involves making decisions every day based on what the organization wants to do
and be.
A. Developing effective strategy
• Actively listen to people both inside and outside the organization.
• Examine trends and discontinuities in the environment and use them.
• Study past events and anticipate the future.
• Use hard analysis to help set a course for the future.
• They strive to develop industry foresight based on trends in technology, demographics,
government regulation, values, and lifestyles that will help them identify new competitive
advantages.
• Situation analysis, for example, includes a search for SWOT—strengths, weaknesses,
opportunities, and threats—that affect organizational performance.
• Leaders using situation analysis obtain external information from a variety of sources, such
as customers, government reports, suppliers, consultants, or association meetings.
• They gather information about internal strengths and weaknesses from sources such as
budgets, financial ratios, profit-and-loss statements, and employee surveys.
• Sometimes leaders have to shift their strategy several times before they get it right.
• In addition, strategy necessarily changes over time to fit shifting environmental conditions.
➢ EXTRA IN TB
B. Elements of strategy
• To improve the chances for success, leaders develop strategies that focus on three
qualities: core competence, developing synergy, and creating value for customers.
• An organization’s core competencies are something the organization does extremely well
in comparison to competitors.
• Leaders identify the organization’s unique strengths—what makes their organization
different from others in the industry.
• Synergy occurs when organizational parts interact to produce a joint effect that is greater
than the sum of the parts acting alone.
• As a result, the organization may attain a special advantage with respect to cost, market
power, technology, or employee skills.
• Focusing on core competencies and attaining synergy help companies create value for their
customers.
• Value can be defined as the combination of benefits received and costs paid by the
customer.
• Delivering value to the customer is at the heart of strategy.
• Strategy formulation integrates knowledge of the environment, vision, and mission with
the company’s core competence in such a way as to attain synergy and create value for
customers.
• When these elements are brought together, the company has an excellent chance to
succeed in a competitive environment.
• But to do so, leaders have to ensure that strategies are executed—that actual behavior
within the organization reflects the desired direction.
C. How to execute?
• Strategy execution means that leaders use specific mechanisms, techniques, or tools for
directing organizational resources to accomplish strategic goals.
• This is the basic architecture for how things get done in the organization.
• Strategy execution, sometimes called implementation, is the most important as well as the
most difficult part of strategic management, and leaders must carefully and consistently
manage the execution process to achieve results.
One survey found that only 57 percent of responding firms reported that managers successfully
implemented the new strategies they had devised over the past three years. Other research has estimated
that as much as 70 percent of all business strategies never get implemented, reflecting the complexity of
strategy execution
➢ EXTRA - The following techniques can help leaders effectively implement strategy:
1. Create ongoing communication.
Leaders must communicate about the strategy continuously so that people throughout
the organization can understand and internalize it.
2. Teach the ‘‘why.’’
Leaders explain why they decided to do what they are doing.
Followers are busy doing the everyday work of the organization and often don’t think
about the big picture.
Leaders have to persuade people of the business reasons for the new vision and
strategy.
3. Explain what this new thing means to each person.
People are often fearful of change, and that includes fear of a new strategic direction.
Leaders can anticipate people’s fears and questions -
what will be expected of me? will I lose my job?
will my job duties and responsibilities change? - and address them head on.
4. Tell what is not changing.
It is often a good idea to remind employees about company strengths, what is currently
working, and what will not change.
People have a hard time taking in new information when they feel that everything around
them is shifting.
Leaders give people a ‘‘place to stand’’ by telling them what is not changing.
➢ EXTRA - The following are five ways coaching can contribute at all levels of your organisation.
1. Helping staff adapt to change
2. Improving productivity and performance
3. Making staff feel valued
4. Assisting in the return to work
5. Dealing with challenges more confidently
COACHING – A POSITIVE APPROACH
• The Skill Will Matrix is a tool that compares willingness to perform a task to the degree of
skill employees have to perform the task well.
• This is plotted on a 2×2 quadrant.
• Each quadrant indicates how the manager should engage with or manage the employees
that fall in that specific quadrant.
Quadrant I: High Skill, High Will
Quadrant II: Low Skill, High Will
Quadrant III: Low Skill, Low Will
Quadrant IV: High Skill, Low Will
• ‘Skill’ is the competence employees possess to function in their role effectively.
• People acquire and develop skills through learning and practice.
• Skills can also be measured in terms of proficiency levels – beginner, intermediate,
advance, and expert.
• ‘Will’ signifies the degree of motivation employees have to perform a task or function in a
role.
• Several things can impact employees’ level of will – degree of skill, professional aspirations,
team and organizational culture, and personal life.
(If even more information - https://www.execvision.io/blog/skill-will-matrix/ )
STEPS IN COACHING
• Coaching employees and teams are the most critical role of a manager/supervisor in
business today.
• The success of the employees, team and organization depend on the coaching ability of the
manager/supervisor.
• There are various techniques, styles and approaches available for coaching
• We will look at two approaches
A. The GROW Model
B. The Coaching Discussion Approach
• For whatever approach you might use, coaching is usually done within the context of a
meeting/session between the coach and the employee.
• Such a meeting will provide both parties with the ideal forum to hold an objective
discussion.
• Mentoring is to support and encourage people to manage their own learning in order that
they may maximise their potential, develop their skills, improve their performance and
become the person they want to be.
• The purpose of mentoring is to tap into the existing knowledge, skills, and experience of
senior or high performing employees and transfer these skills to newer or less experienced
employees in order to advance their careers.
• There are three types of mentoring.
1. Traditional One-on-one Mentoring. A mentee and mentor are matched, either through a
program or on their own.
2. Distance Mentoring. A mentoring relationship in which the two parties (or group) are in
different locations.
3. Group Mentoring. A single mentor is matched with a cohort of mentees.
• ASTD reports that over 75% of executives surveyed indicated mentoring as one of the key
factors in their business successes
• Business Finance Magazine reports that 77% of the companies credited mentoring with
increasing employee retention and performance.
MENTORSHIP
• A mentor is an individual with expertise who can help develop the career of a mentee.
• The mentor guides, trains, advises, and promotes the career development of the mentee.
Two types of mentoring functions: Career & Psychosocial
MENTORING FUNCTIONS
1. CAREER FUNCTIONS: Help the mentee learn the ropes and prepare for career
advancement.
1. Coaching
2. Challenging assignments
3. Exposure and visibility
4. Protection
2. PSYCHOSOCIAL FUNCTIONS: Help the mentee develop a sense of competence & clarity
of identity.
1. Role-Modelling
2. Acceptance and confirmation
3. Counselling
4. Friendship
STAGES OF MENTORING
The 4 phrases introduced by Kathy Kram in her book ‘Mentoring at Work’ are ‘Initiation’,
‘Cultivation’, ‘Separation’ and ‘Redefinition’. Based on Kram’s interpretation, mentoring
relationship is not a procedural but it may move back and forth between the stages within the
mentoring framework. (Not all stages are beneficial to the mentor or to the mentee)
1. Initiation Stage
2. Cultivation Stage
3. Separation Stage
4. Redefinition Stage
1. INITIATION STAGE
• This is the stage where mentor and mentee can establish common ground where they get to
know one another.
• This is the stage to establish relationship and build trust with mentee.
• Informal meeting can be carried out to foster stronger bonding.
• At this stage, mentor can find out about the learning needs of mentee.
• During this stage, peer observation can also be carried out.
• It takes about 6 to 12 months for mentoring relationship to establish.
2. CULTIVATION STAGE
• At this stage, there are frequent interaction opportunities leading to possible mutual
development.
• Relationship is further forged.
• It is the longest period in the mentoring stages that can last from 2 to 5 years.
• During this stage, mentor and mentee can collaborate to carry out projects that can result in
professional development.
• There can also be many challenges as the relationship is being tested through actual work.
3. SEPERATION STAGE
• At this stage, mentee is given autonomy and there will be less frequent meeting with the
mentor.
• During this stage, it will be good to share self-management strategies with mentee.
• Goals and objectives that are not achieved can create disappointment and frustration for
mentee when he/she has more autonomy and need to handle things independently.
• Have an open-door concept where mentee can meet mentor on a need basis to provide a
good listening ear as well as guidance to lead them back on track.
4. REDEFINITION STAGE
• The final stage of mentoring relationship is characterized by a natural redefining of the union
that results from the separation phase.
• The main change is that the hierarchy of the mentor & mentee relationship is no longer at
play, with the two parties becoming equal peers.
• There can be discomfort in the beginning leading to transformation into gratitude of the past
learning journey.
• The fact is that some of these mentees may even have fast promotion opportunities where
they become one of the middle managements very quickly due to their high potential.
ADVANTAGES OF MENTORING
Advantages for the MENTEE:
• Career advancement
• Salary
• Organizational/professional identification
Advantages for the MENTOR:
• Career enhancement
• “Passing the torch to a new generation”
• Learning from mentee – new technologies, new developments, important features of
next generation
DISADVANTAGES OF MENTORING
Disadvantages for the MENTEE:
1. TRANSACTIONAL LEADERS
• This style is most often used by the managers. It focuses on the basic management process
of controlling, organizing, and short-term planning.
• The famous examples of leaders who use transactional technique include McCarthy & De
Gaulle.
• Transactional leadership involves motivating and directing followers primarily through
appealing to their own self-interest.
• The power of transactional leaders comes from their formal authority and responsibility in
the organization.
• The main goal of the follower is to obey the instructions of the leader.
• The style can also be mentioned as a ‘telling style’.
2. TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERS
• Transformational leadership is one of the many kinds of leadership that is usually on display
in the real world.
• It results in a complete rejuvenation of the company and a transformation of its place in the
corporate world
• A vision and the ability to translate it into actionable results and actualize it in practice
MODEL OF TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADER
INSPIRATIONAL MOTIVATION
INTELLECTUAL STIMULATION
IDEALIZED INFLUENCE
• They believe in the philosophy that a leader can influence followers only when he practices
what he preaches.
• The leaders act as role models that followers seek to emulate. Such leaders always win the
trust and respect of their followers through their action.
• They typically place their followers needs over their own, sacrifice their personal gains for
them, ad demonstrate high standards of ethical conduct.
• The use of power by such leaders is aimed at influencing them to strive for the common
goals of the organization.
INDIVIDUALIZED CONSIDERATION
• Leaders act as mentors to their followers and reward them for creativity and innovation.
• The followers are treated differently according to their talents and knowledge.
• They are empowered to make decisions and are always provided with the needed support
to implement their decisions.
Examples of transformational leaders
Works within the organizational culture Work to change the organizational culture by
implementing new ideas
Transactional leaders make employees achieve Transformational leaders motivate and empower
organizational objectives through rewards and employees to achieve company’s objectives by
punishment appealing to higher ideals and moral values
Motivates followers by appealing to their own self- Motivates followers by encouraging them to
interest transcend their own interests for those of the
group or unit
3. LEVEL 5 LEADERS
• Level 5 leaders are modest, shy and fearless and possess the capability to transform an
organization from good to great without portraying themselves as wizards with magic
wands.
• They prefer talking about the company and the contribution of other people but rarely about
their role or achievements
• The Level 5 leadership clearly re-establishes the facts about a simple living and high
thinking with an emphasis on personal humility taught by the older generations.
• The financial breakthroughs achieved by level 5 leaders prove that these characteristics can
achieve tangible results as well.
4. SERVANT LEADERS
• Servant leadership is a philosophy and set of practices that enriches the lives of individuals,
builds better organizations and ultimately creates a more just and caring world.
• While servant leadership is a timeless concept, the phrase “servant leadership” was coined
by Robert K. Greenleaf in The Servant as Leader, an essay that he first published in 1970
• It begins with the natural feeling that one wants to serve, to serve first.
• Then conscious choice brings one to aspire to lead.
• That person is sharply different from one who is leader first, perhaps because of the need to
assuage an unusual power drive or to acquire material possessions.
• The leader-first and the servant-first are two extreme types. Between them there are
shadings and blends that are part of the infinite variety of human nature.
• A servant-leader focuses primarily on the growth and well-being of people and the
communities to which they belong.
• While traditional leadership generally involves the accumulation and exercise of power by
one at the “top of the pyramid,” servant leadership is different.
• The servant-leader shares power, puts the needs of others first and helps people develop
and perform as highly as possible.
IMPORTANCE OF CULTURE
INTERNAL INTEGRATION
EXTERNAL ADAPTATION
• Determines how the organization meets goals and deals with outsiders
• Helps the organization respond rapidly to customer needs or the moves of a competitor
• Encourages employee commitment to the core purpose of the organization
• Determines what the organization needs to meet external challenges
• Embodies the values and assumptions needed by the organization to succeed
CULTURE STRENGTH
• Degree of agreement among employees about the importance of specific values and ways
of doing things
Widespread consensus results in a strong and cohesive culture
Extensive agreement results in a weak culture
• At times strong culture can encourage the wrong values and cause harm
BSNL, Air India, etc.,
TYPES OF CULTURES
CULTURAL LEADERSHIP
• Primary way in which leaders influence norms and values to build a high-performance
culture
• Cultural leader
Actively uses signals and symbols to influence corporate culture.
Articulates a vision for the organizational culture that employees can believe in
Ensures daily activities reinforce the cultural vision
LEADERSHIP
CEREMONIES
• Planned activities that make up a special event and are generally conducted for the benefit
of an audience
• Reinforce specific values
• Create a bond among employees
• Celebrate employees who symbolize important achievements accompanied by presentation
of awards
STORIES
• Narratives based on true events that are repeated frequently and shared among employees
• Used to illustrate the company’s primary values
• May not be supported by facts, but are consistent with the values and beliefs of the
organization
ORGANIZATIONAL VALUES
• Enduring beliefs that have worth, merit, and importance for the organization
• Key values should embody what the organization needs to be effective
• Concerns
Changes in the nature of work
Globalization
Increasing diversity in the workforce
Shifts in the larger society
1. Adaptability Culture
• Characterized by values that support the organization’s ability to interpret and translate
signals from the environment into new behavior responses
Employees make decisions and act freely to meet needs
Responsiveness to customers is highly valued
Leaders create change by encouraging creativity, experimentation, and risk taking
• Examples: Google, Facebook, amazon, flipkart.
2. Achievement Culture
• Characterized by a clear vision of the organization’s goals and leaders’ focus on the
achievement of specific targets
• Results-oriented culture that values:
Competitiveness
Aggressiveness
Personal initiative
Willingness to work long and hard
• Examples – HUL,
3. Involvement Culture
• Has an internal focus on the involvement & participation of employees
• Places value on meeting the needs of organization members
• These cultures are also known as “People first culture”
• Leaders:
Emphasize cooperation, consideration, and fairness
Avoid status differences
• Examples: Twitter, Southwest Airlines
4. Consistency Culture
• Has an internal focus and consistency orientation for a stable environment
• Supports a methodical, rational, orderly way of doing business
Following the rules and being thrifty are valued
• Examples: BSNL, BHEL, TATA
• Ethics:
Code of moral principles and values governing the behavior of a person or group
With respect to what is right and wrong
• Part of the formal policies and informal cultures
• Leaders can create and sustain a climate that emphasizes ethical behavior for all
employees.
VALUE-BASED LEADERSHIP