Spontenous Thoughts in Meditative Tradit
Spontenous Thoughts in Meditative Tradit
Spontenous Thoughts in Meditative Tradit
Spontaneous Thoughts in
Meditative Traditions
Halvor Eifring
The spontaneous flow of seemingly random thoughts is a basic feature of the human
psyche,1 and mind wandering has recently become a hot topic in neuroscience, because
it has been linked to areas in the brain that become more rather than less active when
the person is at rest.2 The nature and function of this stream of consciousness have
been vehemently debated. On the one hand, it has been argued that “a wandering mind
is an unhappy mind,” and that mind wandering is a source of unhealthy distraction
and negative rumination, which in turn may lead to depression and anxiety—in short
mental garbage that needs to be properly disposed of.3 On the other hand, it has also
been argued that since mind wandering takes up almost half of our waking time, it
would not have survived the evolutionary struggle if it had no positive function, and
it has been suggested that the wandering mind helps the person to process emotions
and past memories, prepare for future challenges, perceive present reality more fully,
improve self-understanding as well as empathy with others, and increase his or her
creative potential.4
Meditation has become a significant part of this debate. Some have attempted
to show that meditation reduces mind wandering,5 while others have argued the
opposite, that at least some forms of meditation actually increase the activities of the
wandering mind.6 These contrasting views largely reflect different opinions about
the positive and negative functions of mind wandering. In addition, they also partly
reflect attitudes that have a long history in the various contemplative traditions of
Europe and Asia.
The most immediate historical background of such debates lies in the rise of modern
psychology—in William James’s theoretical notion of the “stream of consciousness”
and Sigmund Freud’s technical uses of “free association,” as well as Jerome L. Singer’s
more recent but less well-known research into “daydreaming.” Long before the advent
of modern psychology, however, discussions concerning spontaneous thoughts
and mind wandering had been taking place for at least a couple of thousand years
in large parts of the Eurasian continent, in the contexts of prayer, meditation, and
contemplation.
While psychoanalysis looks upon free association as a key to the discovery of
inner conflicts and an important tool for the treatment of psychological ailments,
Spontaneous Thoughts in Meditative Traditions 201
Although citta-vṛtti “the fluctuations of the mind” is a wider and at the same time
more technical term than the English phrases “spontaneous thoughts” and “mind
wandering,” this sentence is usually understood to imply that Yoga will lead to a state
202 Meditation and Culture
The nine disturbances are explicitly said to constitute “distractions for the mind” (citta-
vikṣepāḥ), and the five secondary disturbances are said to “accompany the distractions”
(vikṣepa-saha-bhuvaḥ). The first and arguably greatest commentary on the Yoga Sūtra,
the fifth-century Vyāsa commentary, suggests that the fluctuations of the mind would
cease to exist if the nine disturbances were removed (Bryant 2009: 118), thus paving
the way for the (self-)realization of the puruṣa.
The five impediments are clearly also closely connected to the fluctuations of the
mind. However, not all fluctuations of the mind are seen as impediments, at least not
always. On the contrary, the five types of fluctuations are explicitly said to be either
associated with impediments or not (kliṣṭākliṣṭāḥ, sūtra I.5). Although the duality
between puruṣa and prakṛti is absolute, therefore, some aspects of prakṛti are seen
as more conducive to the realization of puruṣa than others, and this includes some
aspects of the fluctuations of the mind. (As we shall see, similar ideas exist in other
contemplative traditions.) Thus, the negative assessment of the fluctuations of the
mind is not all-pervasive.
The distinction between “outgoing” and “restraining” karmic imprints (saṁskāra)
made in sūtra III.9 possibly points in the same direction. The fluctuations of the mind
are at the same time seen as products of karmic imprints from the past and producers
of karmic imprints deciding the future, keeping us in the wheel of life. However, while
the stilling of the fluctuations of the mind leads to the disappearance of the outgoing
imprints, it also leads to the appearance of restraining imprints and thereby, according
to sūtra III.10, to the “undisturbed flow” (praśānta-vāhitā) of the mind. This “flow”
still belongs to prakṛti, and to the mind, but rather than the fluctuating sequence
of different and often disturbing elements, we get “an ongoing sequence of similar
saṁskāras, like a movie reel of identical stills,” and thus come closer to the core or
essence of prakṛti, “an eternal and constant self that is not metaphysically dependent
on or interdependent with anything else,” though functionally dependent on puruṣa.8
The distinction between the three qualities of existence (the guṇas, including the
largely detrimental rajas and tamas and the more benign sattva; the distinction is
not made explicit in the Yoga Sūtra but often referred to in the commentaries) is a
similar case; Yoga reduces the influence of rajas and tamas and manifests the potential
of sattva; are perhaps the non-detrimental states of mind sattvic? Whether this more
positive assessment of some aspects of prakṛti may be extended to what we would call
“spontaneous thoughts” or “mind wandering” is not clear.
If the goal of Yoga is to still the fluctuations of the mind, large parts of the Yoga
Sūtra may be read as a manual on how to attain this goal. At a general level, the stilling
of thoughts is achieved by “practice” (abhyāsa) and “dispassion” (vairāgyābhyām), as
stated in sūtra I.12 and further elaborated in the following aphorisms. While dispassion
is explained as “the controlled consciousness of one who is without craving for sense
objects” (viṣaya-vitṛṣṇasya vaśīkāra-saṁjñā), the primary commentator Vyāsa adds
that this implies an indifference to the sense objects (as a result of long-term practice),
not an active rejection of them and even less their disappearance.9 If the same way of
thinking is applied to spontaneous thoughts, the implication would be that while Yoga
may eventually lead to a state in which such thoughts are stilled, this is an effect of the
practice and is not due to the practitioner’s driving away or suppressing the thoughts.
204 Meditation and Culture
It even allows for a reading where the thoughts are still present, only in a quieter and
less disturbing form, as “restraining” rather than “outgoing” karmic imprints, and as
“sattvic” rather than “tamasic” or “rajasic” elements.
In the Yoga Sūtra, the most basic means of stilling the fluctuations of the mind
lies in various forms of attentional “one-pointedness” (ekāgrya or ekāgratā), mostly
through the successive stages of dhāraṇā “concentration,” dhyāna “meditation,” and
several levels of samādhi “absorption,” as in sūtra II.11:
However, the practical implications of this are not clear. Are concentration, meditation,
absorption, and other forms of “one-pointedness” to be understood as the effects of
a practice or as technical elements involved in that practice? In the Yoga Sūtra, this
distinction is often blurred. In sūtra I.20, for instance, samādhi is listed along with
other qualities more or less as a means to achieve a certain state, while in sūtra II.2 we
are told that samādhi is a state that Yoga may help us bring about. In sūtra I.32, eka-
tattvābhyāsaḥ “practice [of fixing the mind] on one object” is described as a method
to eliminate disturbances, while in sūtra II.41, ekāgrya “one-pointedness” is mentioned
in a list of effects of the purification of the mind. Although the emphasis on meditative
concentration is traditionally interpreted as an injunction to actively dispel spontaneous
thoughts when they arise, it may just as well be seen as focusing on the mentally
absorbing effects of yogic practice, not as technical elements of the practice itself.
Only in sūtra II.33 does the Yoga Sūtra express a concrete approach to counter
unwanted spontaneous thoughts:
attitudes of Islam and Sikhism, via the more ambiguously monotheistic perspective of
trinitarian Christianity, to the plethora of gods in much of devotional Hinduism, the
visualization and corporeal integration of gods in some forms of Daoist mysticism,
and the pseudo-theistic approaches of Pure Land Buddhism. The Yoga Sūtra differs
from most of these, including the bhakti-oriented Hindu schools though not perhaps
Daoist mysticism, in placing comparatively little focus on the emotional element of
devotion. The Sanskrit term for devotion, bhakti, is not even mentioned in the work,
in sharp contrast to many other Hindu schools, including the Bhagavad Gītā, as well
as Sikhism.
Whenever I say “the whole created world” I always mean not only the individual
creatures therein, but everything connected with them. There is no exception
whatever, whether you think of them as physical or spiritual beings, or of their
states or actions, or of their goodness or badness. (ch. 5)
As ofte as I sey “alle þe creatures þat ever ben maad,” as ofte I mene, not only þe self
creatures, bot also alle þe werkes & þe condicions of þe same creatures. I oute-take
not o creature, wheþer þei ben bodily creatures or goostly, ne ȝit any condicion or
werk of any creature, wheþer þei be good or iuel.
All thoughts, spontaneous or not, belong to the realm of “created things” and may
disturb the direct contemplation of “God himself ”:
Everything you think about, all the time you think about it, is “above” you, between
you and God. And you are that much farther from God if anything but God is in
your mind. (ch. 5)
alle þing þat þou þinkest apon is abouen þee for þe tyme, & bitwix þee & þi God.
& in so mochel þou arte þe ferþer fro God, þat ouȝt is in þi mynde bot only God.
206 Meditation and Culture
This must be seen as an argument against a widespread tendency within Late Medieval
Christian mysticism to approach God through intellectual approaches. The distinction
between created and uncreated and the relegation of thoughts to the realm of creation
have a long history within Christianity. As an early example, Evagrios Pontikos
(345–99) argues that even “dispassionate” thoughts keep us far from God, since they
are directed toward “created things,” while God is “beyond sense-perception and
beyond concept.”12
Both in Evagrios and in The Cloud of Unknowing, the thoughts discussed clearly
include what we would call spontaneous thoughts or mind wandering. While admitting
that such thoughts can be both angelic and demonic, or even plainly human, Evagrios
strongly tends to link thoughts to passion and to demonize them: “[The demon]
is always using our memory to stir up thoughts of various things and our flesh to
arouse the passions, in order to obstruct our way of ascent to God.”13 He classifies such
thoughts (logismoi) into lists of eight (gluttony, unchastity, avarice, anger, dejection,
listlessness, self-esteem, and pride), much like the lists of detrimental factors we saw
in the Yoga Sūtra. His list is further refined by the Church and ends up as the famous
idea of the Seven Deadly Sins.
Though arguing that thoughts keep the contemplative away from God, The Cloud
of Unknowing seems to have a much more accepting view of them than Evagrios.
Thoughts are “the expression of your normal mind,”14 and “[a]ll the while a soul lives
in this mortal body . . . he will always see and feel some of God’s creatures, or their
deeds, pressing in upon his mind between him and God.”15 Therefore, “a spontaneous
thought, springing to mind unsought and unwittingly, cannot be reckoned to be sin,”
whether it is “something you like, a thing that pleases you, or has pleased you in the
past,” or is “a grouse over something that grieves you, or has grieved you.”16
The author adds, almost as an afterthought, that spontaneous thoughts may be “the
result[s] of original sin” (þe pyne of þe original sinne), but since “you were cleansed
from the guilt of that when you were baptized” (of þe whiche sinne þou arte clensid in þi
baptyme), they cannot really be called sinful any more (ch. 10). Note the similarity with
the Yoga Sūtra’s view of spontaneous thoughts as resulting from past karmic imprints,
which is perhaps the closest Yogic equivalent to the Christian notion of sin. In both
cases, spontaneous thoughts are seen as residuals from the past.
However normal and unsinful, such thoughts or impulses nevertheless need to be
“quickly put down” (smetyn sone doun):
If you allow houseroom to this thing that you naturally like or grouse about, and
make no attempt to rebuke it, ultimately it will take root in your inmost being, in
your will, and with the consent of your will. Then it is deadly sin. (ch. 10)
ȝif it so be þat þis likyng or gruching fastnyng in þi fleschly herte & þeires be
suffred so longe to abide vnreproued, þat þan at þe last it is fastnid to þe goostly
herte (þat is to sey þe wile) wiþ a ful consent: þan it is deedly synne.
The practical implication of this often sounds like brutal suppression, actually much
more obviously so than the attentiveness (prosochi), watchfulness (nipsis), and
guarding of one’s heart (phylaki kardias) advocated by Evagrios and other Desert
Fathers. The practitioner must “crush all knowledge and experience of all forms of
Spontaneous Thoughts in Meditative Traditions 207
created things,”17 “trample them down under foot,”18 and “suppress all this in the
cloud of forgetting,”19 “stamping out all remembrance of God’s creation.”20 “[A]s often
as they come up, push them down.”21 This is “very hard work indeed,”22 the aim of
which is to achieve “the single-minded intention of our spirit directed to God himself
alone.”23
In The Cloud of Unknowing, therefore, there is hardly any doubt that the practitioner
is asked to forcefully drive away all thoughts. Various techniques or stratagems are
devised to help him on the way. First of all, he may “take a short word . . . of one
syllable,” “[a] word like ‘god’ or ‘love’,” “or perhaps some other, so long as it is of one
syllable,” and use it to “hammer the cloud and the darkness above you” (the cloud of
unknowing separating him from God) and to “suppress all thought under the cloud
of forgetting.”24
If this does not help him get rid of the thoughts, two other “schemes” (sleiȝtes) are
proposed. The first suggests that you should “[d]o everything you can to act as if you
did not know that they [thoughts, impulses and memories] were so strongly pushing
in between you and God,”25 as if denying their presence.
The second scheme is perhaps more interesting, since it seems to imply giving
up the aim of dispelling spontaneous thoughts: “Cower down before them like some
cringing captive overcome in battle, and reckon that it is ridiculous to fight against
them any longer,” so that you “surrender yourself to God while you are in the hands of
your enemies.”26 The implication seems to be that sometimes, the fight against thoughts
may in the end be just as much an obstacle to the contemplation of God as the thoughts
themselves.
It is also interesting to note that the “hard work” involved in the fight against
spontaneous thoughts is gradually made easier, both because “one has got used to it
over a long period” and because “devotion has come,” after which “[y]ou even may
have little effort to make, or none,” because “sometimes God will do it all himself.”27
In addition to habituation, therefore, the increasing proximity to God will reduce the
effort required to drive away the thoughts. In the end, we are told, you should “not
overstrain yourself emotionally or beyond your strength,” and “[w]ork with eager
enjoyment rather than with brute force.”28
In contrast to the rather sparing theistic references in the Yoga Sūtra, the longing
love for God is the main theme in The Cloud of Unknowing. Even here, however, there
are also examples of depersonalized and nontheistic references to a transcendent
realm described in paradoxical language. In chapter 68, the practitioner is told that
he should be “nowhere” (noȝwhere) and be tied to “nothing” (nouȝt), but that it is only
his “outer self ” (vtter man) that is calling this “nothing,” while his inner “self calls” it
“All” (Al), and “when you are ‘nowhere’ physically, you are ‘everywhere’ spiritually”
(whi noȝwhere bodely is euerywhere goodly). To the neophyte, this realm appears
“completely dark and hidden” (ful blynde & ful derk), but it is actually “overwhelming
spiritual light that blinds the soul that is experiencing it” (a soule is . . . bleendid in
felyng of it for habundaunce of goostly liȝt).
Furthermore, the longing love for God is described as a “quiet, eager joy, at rest in
body and soul.”29 The author warns against “the violence of emotional reaction”30 and
against “behaving wildly like some animal.”31
208 Meditation and Culture
state of mind.38 With worries and sadness, joy and anger, there is no place for the Way.39
Agitation is harmful and also makes us lose the Way.40 We should not let external
things disrupt our senses, and not let our senses disrupt our minds.41 And while
thinking is part of life, it leads to knowledge, and excessive knowledge may be fatal, or
at least make you lose your vitality.42 Not being able to let go of your thoughts makes
you distressed inside and weak outside,43 though even thinking that reaches a dead
end may eventually, by help of external spiritual forces, reach a positive breakthrough:
Think about it, think about it, and think about it again. When thinking about it
provides no way through, ghosts and spirits will provide a way through, though
not due to the power of the ghosts and the spirits, but to the perfection of essence
and energy.
思之思之, 又重思之。 思之而不通, 鬼神將通之, 非鬼神之力也, 精氣之
極也。(Roth 1999: 83)
How, then, do these meditative techniques deal with the various spontaneous impulses
that are seen as detrimental to the attainment of the Way? Some passages propose
getting rid of (去) or stopping (止) them, or, in a metaphor, diligently cleaning out
the lodging place of the numinous (敬除其舍). In general, however, the text is more
interested in creating harmony (和) than in ridding the mind entirely of its spontaneous
impulses. The problem is not the impulses in themselves, which are as natural to man
as the four seasons are to heaven:
Spring and autumn, winter and summer are the seasons of the heavens, . . . Pleasure
and anger, accepting and rejecting are the devices of human beings.
春秋冬夏,天之時也……喜怒取予,人之謀也。(Roth 1999: 59)
The problem is their excessiveness (淫) and loss of measure (失度). The solution is to
regulate (節) them and limit them to the appropriate degree (節適之齊), not to pull
and push them (勿引勿推) or use force (力). Then the results will come spontaneously
(自來, 自至, 自歸), and the Way will of itself become stable (道將自定).
The regulation of spontaneous thoughts and impulses seems to be driven by a strong
concern with gain (得) and loss (失). Depending on one’s ability to harmonize the
mind properly, one can either gain the Way or lose it, and this is not only a matter of
gaining or losing the guiding thread (紀), the basic point (端), or the proper measure
(度), but is portrayed as a question of worldly success (成) or failure (敗), order (治)
or chaos (亂), and even life (生) or death (死). It is also what makes or breaks a ruler’s
ability to make the world listen (天下聽) and submit (天下服). Whatever one has
gained, therefore, must be diligently guarded against loss (敬守勿失). In spite of the
emphasis on the basic spontaneity of the Way, the diligent regulation of thoughts and
impulses seems to represent a clear restriction of their spontaneous flow.
As in the Yoga Sūtra, many formulations in Inward Training are ambiguous with
regard to method and effect. Terms like “collect the mind” (摶心), “hold on to the
one” (執一), and “guard the one and discard the myriad particularities” (守一棄萬苛)
may be read as injunctions to concentrate on one thing and suppress everything else,
and posterity has often read them this way. But they may also, and just as likely, be
210 Meditation and Culture
read as expressions of a unifying vision of the Way that includes but is not limited by
all particular detail, including thoughts and impulses. The open awareness implied by
terms such as “enlarge the mind” (大心) and “widen the energies” (寬氣) seems to
point in the latter direction. This vision is primarily an effect of meditative practice, and
it is unclear to what extent it has technical implications for the practice itself.
Ever since I encountered the Pure School, I have often seen people reciting the
name of the Buddha while either being obsessed with reaching awakening and
thus blocking their mind or detesting deluded thoughts and thus filling their mind
with worries. (p. 431c)
崑自學淨宗以來, 每見念佛之人, 或執著悟門, 意不開暢, 或惡嫌妄想,
心生憂愁。
Spontaneous Thoughts in Meditative Traditions 211
Gǔkūn insists that “even a multitude of digressive thoughts are no hindrance,”46 and
that “you do not need to dispel deluded thoughts.”47 He encourages the practitioner to
“stop detesting deluded thoughts as if they were thieves,”48 and to “give free rein to the
thousands and ten thousands of thoughts.”49 He even presents a poem of twelve stanzas
in which each stanza begins with the line “reciting the name in a messy way is full
of effects,”50 indicating that digressions are no hindrance, and another poem of eight
stanzas in which each stanza begins with the line “there is no need to be concerned
about deluded thoughts.”51 In the latter poem, he suggests a mindful approach to such
thoughts: “Just see what it [the thought] is.”52 While Gǔkūn is not the only Buddhist
who criticizes the goal-orientation implied in ridding the mind of thoughts, he goes
further than most in insisting that the presence of mind wandering is no obstacle to
spiritual progress.
Paradoxically, however, we also see in his text, as in almost all Buddhist texts on
the subject, a strong concern with the assumed negative effects of mind wandering,
as well as its connection with bad karma from previous lives. Gǔkūn complains that
“the multitude of digressive thoughts is really lamentable, and thousands of schemes
do not help to get rid of them,”53 and that “the mind is chaotic and in urgent need of
smoothing out.”54 He repeatedly uses the image of the wandering mind as an untamed
and seemingly untamable horse or monkey, bemoaning the fact that “the monkey of
the mind and the horse of consciousness are utterly hard to stop.”55 The notion of mind
wandering as a detrimental factor in the quest for spiritual progress is by no means
absent from Gǔkūn’s way of thinking.
This paradox in Gǔkūn’s ideas on mind wandering is made explicit in one of his
poems. The first two stanzas deal with the negative effects of deluded thoughts, insisting
that they are “the deep roots of calamity” (禍根深), which “often make practitioners fall
into the river of love” (常害行人落愛河) and “lose their good karma” (失正因). The
last two stanzas, however, hail deluded thoughts as an aspect of the “true mind” (真心),
full of “glorious merit” (奇勳). While this ambiguity is in line with the philosophical
nondualism typical of Mahāyāna Buddhism, Gǔkūn’s thinking is more practical. It is
the recitation of the buddha’s name, we are told in the same poem, that has the power
of “assimilating the deluded (thoughts) within the true (mind)” (攝妄歸真) (p. 433).
As in other traditions, therefore, the key lies in the efficacy of the meditation object.
We are told that “only the Amitābha phrase can restrain the mind,”56 that “uninterrupted
recitation is the cause, and undistracted mental absorption is the effect,”57 and that
even “lax recitation” (散稱) will make “the deluded thoughts lighter and lighter, and
the sinful defilements fewer and fewer.”58
From this point of view, the mistake of many practitioners lies not so much in
seeking mental absorption without digressive thoughts as in trying to do so by
controlling the mind, and in thinking that such mental absorption is a precondition
for proper practice rather than its result. Gǔkūn urges practitioners “not to seek mental
absorption intentionally but to let it come spontaneously.” “How can you reach mental
absorption by means of control? The mind cannot be controlled.”59 The solution lies in
reciting the name of the buddha without interruption.
Gǔkūn acknowledges that even proper practice does not always make the thoughts
go away, that “even with the silent recitation of Amitābha Buddha they still do not
212 Meditation and Culture
cease,”60 and that “while one recites the name of the Buddha, the mind keeps thinking
of other things, not stopping for a moment even after all kinds of suppression.”61 On
a practical level, he meets this challenge by using a rosary to count the number of
recitations (記數), with the additional effect of keeping the mind on the task without
interruptions. In terms of doctrine, Gǔkūn repeatedly refers to his own version of a
quote from the Lotus Sūtra, stating that “when the Buddha’s name is thrust into a
chaotic mind, the chaotic mind becomes a buddha.”62 In other words, such recitation
makes it possible to “enter the seed of buddhahood without cutting off the deluded
mind.”63 This is what makes Pure Land practices superior to other practices, especially
in our degenerated times:
In our times, with few great practitioners and much karmic affliction, how many
people are able to reach awakening and not give rise to deluded thoughts? (p. 432a)
當今之世,知識愈少,業障愈多,能開悟門,不起妄想,又能有幾人?
Gǔkūn thinks the ideal of emptying the mind of thoughts is unrealistic and therefore
destructive:
There are signs that he hopes this will eventually reduce or remove the wandering
mind if not earlier, then at least at the moment of death:
At the moment of death, when the buddha-name is recited, and the rosary buds
counted, all karmic afflictions disappear, pent-up impulses become smooth and
clear, and great merit is achieved. (p. 434c)
畢命為期,佛一出音,珠一記數,塵累每銷,滯情融朗,功愈勝矣。
Even for Gǔkūn, therefore, freedom from thoughts seems to remain an ideal. However,
in contrast to the suppression of thoughts in The Cloud of Unknowing and some Yoga
traditions and the harmonization of thoughts in Inward Training, Gǔkūn tells the
practitioner to let the thoughts pass freely, at most restraining them by counting the
buds on a rosary, and to be unconcerned with the results of one’s practice, with whether
or not the thoughts eventually go away.
Conclusion
In all the four cases we have studied, there exist dualities in which spontaneous
thoughts come out on the “wrong” side with regard to the meditative or contemplative
Spontaneous Thoughts in Meditative Traditions 213
project. The four cases differ from each other in what they are seeking, whether it be
a personal deity like the Christian or Yogic god, an impersonal force like the Daoist
Way, a higher self like the Yogic puruṣa, or rebirth in a paradisiacal realm like the
Buddhist Pure Land of the West. The four cases also differ from each other regarding
the nature and status of the dualities, from the strict dualism of the Christian tradition
and Yoga to the so-called monistic views of early Daoism and the nondualism of Pure
Land Buddhism. In all four cases, however, meditation is most often seen as a way of
eventually putting the stream of thoughts to rest, and the constant flow of digressive
thoughts is mostly viewed as an obstacle that must be overcome.
The practical approaches to spontaneous thoughts differ both between the four
cases and within each case. The tendency to fight or suppress the emergence of such
thoughts is found in all four traditions, most pronounced in the Christian case and
least so in the Pure Land thinking of Gǔkūn, though even in his case, the use of the
rosary points in the direction of subtle suppression. However, suppression is not the
only solution in any of the traditions. In the Christian case, the “scheme” of pretending
that the thoughts are not there might perhaps qualify as a weak case of psychological
denial, while the other “scheme,” whereby the meditator gives up the fight against the
thoughts, seems to involve a reluctant acceptance of the presence of mind wandering.
The Daoist approach is also semi-accepting of spontaneous thoughts and impulses,
but insists on their moderation and regulation. More clearly accepting of spontaneous
thoughts are the attempts at meeting them with various forms of mindful observation
and analysis (in Buddhism and Yoga), with an open awareness that transforms the
thoughts by including them in the field of awareness or simply without attempting
what is seen as the futile and counterproductive endeavor of suppressing them.
In all four traditions, there is a tendency to assume that the ideal state of mind
has no mind wandering, and that the acceptance of thoughts is a preliminary tactic
rather than the end point. There are, however, also voices insisting that the presence
or absence of thoughts is not decisive, and that true liberation involves nonattachment
both to thoughts and to the absence of thoughts. Note that Neo-Confucian meditation,
which has not been discussed in this chapter, is sometimes explicit in not seeking a
state without thoughts, reflecting its opposition to what it conceives as the Buddhist
and Daoist tendencies to turn their back on the world.64
The comparison between these four traditions raises the question of the sources of
the various cross-cultural similarities. The phenomenon of mind wandering is itself no
doubt universal and may be linked to neurological and psychological features that are
common to mankind. It is less easy, however, to pin down the sources of the skeptical
attitudes toward mind wandering, as well as to the dualities between a phenomenal
dimension to which mind wandering belongs and a non-phenomenal dimension
situated at the core of the meditative quest in widely different traditions. Cultural
constructivists may see these similarities as superficial and point to the significant
differences between theistic and nontheistic approaches, between monistic, non-
dualistic, and dualistic views, and between different explanations for the emergence of
mind wandering. Perennialists, on the other hand, may insist that it is the differences
that are superficial, that all contemplative traditions (in contrast to some modern
meditative approaches) ultimately attempt to get closer to a dimension beyond all
214 Meditation and Culture
phenomena, and that this accounts for the cross-cultural parallels in attitudes and
methodology. By combining an interest in similarities and differences, I have tried to
balance these two positions.
From a modern psychological point of view, some of the various approaches to
spontaneous thoughts in meditation may involve the suppression and possibly denial
of psychological impulses. However, the absence of or nonattachment to thoughts
aimed for by all four traditions may in no case be fully accounted for by psychological
terminology related to defense mechanisms like suppression and denial. Though
some of the contemplative methodologies involve much effort to start with, they
have in common an assumption that once you have been through a certain inner
transformation, no effort is necessary to keep thoughts (or the attachment to thoughts)
away. This kind of transformation seems to belong to a realm not readily describable
in standard psychological terms, perhaps relating to the non-phenomenal dimension
discussed by perennialists.
This is not to say, however, that there are not also points of convergence between
psychology and meditation. Both Freudian or later psychodynamic schools and many
meditative traditions see spontaneous thoughts and mind wandering as an expression
of residuals from a past that still exercises its limiting influence on us. In our case, all
the sources except perhaps Inward Training build at least partly on such a view. The
treatment of neurotic traits in psychodynamic therapy may also be seen as an untying
of knots that produce attachment. The use of free association to discover and release
such knots may have things in common with meditation techniques that allow the
passing of spontaneous thoughts rather than attempting to drive them away. In our
material, such techniques are most obviously present in many a Pure Land Buddhism.
The types of meditation that have been most popular in the West since the 1960s
generally have a more accepting attitude toward mind wandering than what has been
common in the various meditative traditions. This applies to Transcendental Meditation
and the many other mantra- or sound-based techniques that became hugely popular at
the beginning of this wave and which are still influential. It also applies to the breath-
and body-based techniques that are now most often associated with mindfulness
meditation, but also with Zen, Vipassana, and various other Buddhist-inspired labels.
As we have seen, this more accepting attitude has long roots in the traditions
themselves, where it has coexisted with more unequivocally negative and suppressive
attitudes for centuries or even millennia. Moreover, to judge by the Pure Land text,
the increasing acceptance of mind wandering was already well on its way even before
the twentieth-century modernized versions of meditation were developed and
disseminated. Further studies of the late premodern development of other practices
are necessary to determine whether or not this is a general tendency.
Some of the differences in attitude that exist within the traditions continue to make
their influence felt in modern discourses on meditation. In general, the mantra- and
sound-based techniques tend to be most unequivocally accepting of mind wandering.
While aiming to bring the practitioner to the “source of thought,” Transcendental
Meditation allows spontaneous thoughts and impulses during meditation.65 Most
other modern mantra- and sound-based techniques, including the biologically
oriented Relaxation Response66 and the Christian practice of Centering Prayer,67 are
Spontaneous Thoughts in Meditative Traditions 215
also practiced with a high degree of acceptance of mind wandering, though without
any explicit attempt at reaching the “source of thought.” In the psychologically oriented
practice of Acem Meditation, mind wandering is not only accepted, but is seen as a
resource helping the practitioner to release inner tension and set inner resources
in motion.68 In contrast, the modern Buddhist-inspired breath- and body-based
techniques tend to see the acceptance of mind wandering as a provisional means to
ultimately enable the practitioner to “let go” of the impulses, hence keeping up the
traditional aim of reducing the impact of distractive thoughts.
To some extent, the neuroscientific discourse on mind wandering reflects these
differences. The most skeptical views of mind wandering, related to its negative
impact on mood and concentration, are often associated with studies on Mindfulness
Meditation, sometimes in combination with cognitive psychology, and some of these
studies argue that meditation reduces mind wandering and the corresponding brain
activity. The more positive views of mind wandering, related to its beneficial impact
on relaxation, heart function, and the processing of memories and emotions, are most
often associated with sound-based forms of meditation, primarily Transcendental
Meditation and Acem Meditation.69
This chapter has primarily focused on the traditional approaches to spontaneous
thoughts in meditative practice. By doing so, however, I also hope to suggest that the
modern discourses on mind wandering and its corresponding brain networks partly
reflect issues with deep historical roots, and that these roots deserve much more
thorough research.
Notes 239
Chapter 13
1 This chapter has profited much from comments by Guttorm Gundersen and Gunnar
Sjøstedt.
2 Mason et al. (2007), Buckner, Andrews-Hanna, and Schacter (2008).
3 Killingsworth and Gilbert (2010).
4 Buckner, Andrews-Hanna, and Schacter (2008) and Andrews-Hanna (2012).
5 Brewer et al. (2011), Hofmann, Grossman, and Hinton (2011), and Holzel et al.
(2007).
6 Xu et al. (2014), Jang et al. (2011), and Travis et al. (2010).
7 See Bryant (2009). This part of the chapter has profited from discussions with Edwin
Bryant. Most of my references to the Yoga Sūtra, including its English translations,
are to Bryant’s work, though the exact wording of the translations has sometimes
been modified by me, in order to fit better with the present context.
8 Bryant (2009: 317f. and 544 n. 33).
9 Bryant (2009: 52).
10 Bryant (2009: 256).
11 All translations from The Cloud of Unknowing are from Wolters (1978), while the
Middle English text is quoted from Hodgson (1958).
12 Palmer et al. (1979–99, vol. 1, pp. 62 and 58).
13 Palmer et al. (1979–99, vol. 1, p. 61).
14 a clere beholding of þi kindely witte; ch. 8.
15 þe whiles þat a soule is wonyng in þis deedly flesche, it schal euermore se & fele þis
combros cloude of vnknowyng bitwix him & God; ch. 28.
16 a nakyd sodein þouȝt of any of hem presing aȝens þi wile & þi wetyng, þof al it be no
sinne arettid vnto þee; . . . with sum maner of likyng ȝif it be a þing þat pleseþ þee or
haþ plesid þee bifore, or elles wiþ sum maner of gruching ȝif it be a þing þat þee þink
greueþ þee or haþ greued þee before; ch. 10.
17 breek doun alle wetyng & felyng of alle maner of creatures; ch. 43.
18 treed hem down vnder þi fete; ch. 31.
19 put it doune vnder þe cloude of forȝetyng; ch. 8.
20 tredyng doun of þe mynde of alle þe creatures þat euer God maad; ch. 26.
21 as ofte as þei rise, as ofte put þeim doun; ch. 31.
22 a ful grete trauayle; ch. 26.
23 nakid entente directe vnto God for him-self; ch. 24.
24 take þee bot a litil worde of o silable, . . . & soche a worde is þis worde god or þis worde
loue, . . . or anoþer as þe list: whiche þat þee likeþ best of o silable, . . . bete on þis
cloude & þis derknes abouen þee, . . . smite doun al maner þouȝt vnder þe cloude of
forȝeting; ch. 7.
25 Do þat in þee is to lat as þou wist not þat þei prees so fast apon þee, bitwix þee & þi
God; ch. 32.
26 koure þou doun under hem as a cheitif & a coward ouercomen in batayle, & þink þat
it is bot a foly to þee to stryue any lenger wiþ hem; & þerfore þou ȝeeldest þee to God in
þe handes of þin enmyes; ch. 32.
27 he haue of longe tyme vsid him þer-in; . . . þou haste douocion; . . . þou schalt haue
ouþer litil trauaile or none; . . . þan wil God worche som-tyme al by him-self; ch. 26.
28 streyne not þin hert in þi brest ouer-rudely, ne oute of mesure; . . . wirche more wiþ a
list þen wiþ any liþer strengþe; ch. 46.
29 listely wiþ a softe & a demure contenaunce, as wel in body as in soule; ch. 46.
30 boistouste of bodely felyng; ch. 47.
31 þis beestly ruednes; ch. 46.
32 Graham (1989: 100).
33 Roth (1999: 23–30).
34 Rickett (1998).
35 口之所不能言也,目之所不能視也,耳之所不能聽也; 序其成; 不見其形; 無所;
窮無所; 人不能固; 其往不復,其來不舍; 無根無莖,無葉無榮; 充形; 與我俱生;
不遠; 不離; Roth (1999: 52–57).
36 心以藏心; 心之中又有心焉; 心之心; Roth (1999: 73).
37 道乃可止; 道乃可得; Roth (1999: 55).
38 其所以失 之,必以憂樂喜怒欲利; Roth (1999: 51).
39 憂悲喜怒,道乃無處; Roth (1999: 95).
Adamek, Wendi Leigh (2007), The Mystique of Transmission: On an Early Chan History
and Its Contexts, New York: Columbia University Press.
Adler, Joseph (2004), “Varieties of Spiritual Experience: Shen in Neo-Confucian
Discourse,” in Tu Weiming and Mary Evelyn Tucker (eds), Confucian Spirituality,
vol. 2, 120–48, New York: Crossroad.
Anālayo (2003), Satipaṭṭhāna: The Direct Path to Realization, Birmingham: Windhorse
Publications.
Andersen, Poul (1980), The Method of Holding the Three Ones, London: Curzon Press.
Anderson, Benedict (1990), “The Idea of Power in Javanese Culture,” in Benedict
Anderson (ed.), Language and Power: Exploring Political Cultures in Indonesia, 1–69,
Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Andrews-Hanna, J. R. (2012), “The Brain’s Default Network and its Adaptive Role in
Internal Mentation,” Neuroscientist, 18: 251–70.
Ani Lochen (1975), Gangs shug ma ni lo chen rig ’dzin chos nyid bzang mo’i rnam par thar
pa rnam mkhyen bde ster. The autobiographical reminiscences of the famed religious
master and reembodiment of Klong chen pa Shug gseb rJe brun Rig ’dzin chos nyid
bzang mo [1865-1951]. Reproduced from a tracing of a print from the Central Tibetan
blocks by Sonam Topgay Kazi. The Ngagyur Nyingmay Sungrab Series, vol. 22,
Gangtok Sikkim (281 folios).
App, Urs (1995), “Mushinron—Tonkō shutsudo no ichi tekisuto”
無心論:敦煌出土の一テキスト, Zenbunka kenkyūjo kiyō, 21 (May): 1–69.
Arnold, Daniel Anderson (2005), Buddhists, Brahmins, and Belief: Epistemology in Indian
and Buddhist Philosophy, New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Arnold, Daniel Anderson (2012), Brains, Buddhas, and Believing: The Problem of
Intentionality in Classical Buddhist and Cognitive-scientific Philosophy of Mind, New
York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Arunachalam, M. (1983), The Śaivagamas, Mayuram: Gandhi Vidayalam.
Austin, James (1998), Zen and the Brain: Toward an Understanding of Meditation and
Consciousness, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Azuma Jūji 吾妻重二 (2004), Shushigaku no shin kenkyū 朱子學の新研究, Tokyo:
Sōbunsha.
Bagga, Raj Kumar (1984), The Ocean of Love: The Anurag Sagar of Kabir—Translated
and Edited Under the Direction of Sant Ajaib Singh Ji, Sanbornton, NH: Sant Bani
Ashram.
Baier, Karl (2009), Meditation und Moderne: Zur Genese eines Kernbereichs moderner
Spiritualität in der Wechselwirkung zwischen Westeuropa, Nordamerika und Asien,
Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.
Bauer, Wolfgang (1990), Das Antlitz Chinas: Die autobiographische Selbstdarstellung in der
chinesischen Literatur von ihren Anfängen bis heute, Munich: Carl Hanser Verlag.
Bäumer, Bettina (2004), Vijñāna Bhairava: Das göttliche Bewußtsein, Frankfurt: Verlag der
Weltreligionen.
Demiéville, Paul (1987), “The Mirror of Mind,” Gregory (1987: 13–40). (First published in
French in 1947 as “Le miroir spirituel,” in Sinologica 1 [2]: 112–37.)
Dharamvīr, Dr. (1999), Kabīr: Ḍā. Hajārī Prasād Dvivedī kā prakṣipt ciṃtan. Kabīr: naī
sadī meṃ: 1. Nayī Dillī: Vāṇī Prakāśan.
Dictionnaire de spiritualité, vol. X, Paris: Beauchesne, 1978.
Donner, Neal (1977), “The Mahāyānization of the Chinese Dhyāna Tradition,” Eastern
Buddhist n.s., 10 (2): 49–64.
Donner, Neal (1987), “Sudden and Gradual Intimately Conjoined: Chih’i’s T’ien-t’ai View,”
in Peter Gregory (ed.), Sudden and Gradual: Approaches to Enlightenment in Chinese
Thought, 201–26, Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.
Donner, Neal and Daniel B. Stevenson (1993), The Great Calming and Contemplation:
A Study and Annotated Translation of the First Chapter of Chih-i’s Mo-ho chih-kuan,
Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.
Dowman, Keith (1988), The Power-Places of Central Tibet: The Pilgrim’s Guide, New York,
NY: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Drewes, G. J. (1966), “The Struggle between Javanism and Islam as Illustrated by the Serat
Darmogandul,” Bijdragen tot di Taal-Lande en Volkenkunde, 122 (3): 309–65.
Dreyfus, Georges (1997), Recognizing Reality: Dharmakīrti’s Philosophy and Its Tibetan
Interpretations, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Dreyfus, Georges (2011), “Is Mindfulness Present-centred and Non-judgmental? A
Discussion of the Cognitive Dimensions of Mindfulness,” Contemporary Buddhism, 12
(1): 41–54.
Dube, Saurabh (1998), Untouchable Pasts: Religion, Identity, and Power among a Central
Indian Community, 1780-1950, SUNY Series in Hindu Studies, Albany, NY: State
University of New York Press.
Duhan, Lalchand (2007), Anurāg Sāgar, 4th edn, Delhi: Manoj Publications.
Dunne, John (2011), “Toward an Understanding of Non-dual Mindfulness,” Contemporary
Buddhism, 12 (1): 71–88.
Dwivedi, Hazariprasad (1963), Sahaj Sādhanā, 1st edn, Bhopāla: Madhya Pradeś Śāsan
Sāhitya Pariṣad.
Dwivedi, Hazariprasad (1971), Kabīr: Kabīr ke vyaktitva, sāhitya, aur dārśanik vicāroṃ kī
ālocnā, New Delhi: Rajkamal Prakashan.
Eberth, J. and P. Sedlmeier (2012), “The Effects of Mindfulness Meditation: A Meta-
analysis,” Mindfulness, 3: 174–98.
Edou, Jerome (1996), Machig Labdron and the Foundation of Chod, Ithaca, NY:
Snow Lion.
Eifring, Halvor (2010), “Characteristics of East Asian Meditation,” Acta Orientalia, 71:
127–59.
Eifring, Halvor (2013), “Meditation in Judaism, Christianity and Islam: Technical Aspects
of Devotional Practices,” in Halvor Eifring (ed.), Meditation in Judaism, Christianity
and Islam: Cultural Histories, 1–13, London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Eifring, Halvor (2016a), “What Is Meditation,” in Halvor Eifring (ed.), Asian Traditions of
Meditation, Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.
Eifring, Halvor (2016b), “Types of Meditation,” in Halvor Eifring (ed.), Asian Traditions of
Meditation, Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.
Eifring, Halvor and Are Holen (2014), “The Uses of Attention: Elements of Meditative
Practice,” in Halvor Eifring (ed.), Hindu, Buddhist and Daoist Meditation: Cultural
Histories, 1–26, Oslo: Hermes.
Eisenstadt, S. N. (2000), “Multiple Modernities,” Daedalus, 129 (1): 1–29.
Elias, Jamal J. (2013), “Sufi Dhikr Between Meditation and Prayer,” in Halvor Eifring (ed.),
Meditation in Judaism, Christianity and Islam: Cultural Histories, 189–200, London:
Bloomsbury Academic.
Ellingsen, Ø. and A. Holen (2008), “Meditation: A Scientific Perspective,” in S. Davanger,
H. Eifring and A. G. Hersoug (eds), Fighting Stress, 11–35, Oslo: Acem Publishing.
Engelhardt, Ute (1996), “Zur Bedeutung der Atmung im Qigong,” Chinesische Medizin, 1
(1996): 17–23.
Engström, M., J. Pihlsgård, P. Lundberg, and B. Söderfeldt (2010), “Functional Magnetic
Resonance Imaging of Hippocampal Activation during Silent Mantra Meditation,”
Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 16: 1253–8.
Epstein, Gerald (1989), Healing Visualizations: Creating Health through Imagery,
New York, NY: Bantam.
Epstein, Shari Ruei-hua (2006), “Boundaries of the Dào: Hanshan Deqing’s (1546-1623)
Buddhist Commentary on the Zhuangzi,” PhD dissertation, Stanford University.
Epton, Nina (1974 [1956]), Magic and Mystics of Java, London: Octagon.
Eskildsen, Stephen (2014), “Red Snakes and Angry Queen Mothers: Hallucinations and
Epiphanies in Medieval Daoist Meditation,” in Halvor Eifring (ed.), Hindu, Buddhist
and Daoist Meditation: Cultural Histories, 149–83, Oslo: Hermes.
Exx. = Mullan (1914).
Fabre, Pierre-Antoine (1992), Ignace de Loyola: Le lieu de l’image, Paris: Vrin/EHESS.
Faure, Bernard (1986), “The Concept of One-Practice-Samadhi in Early Ch’an,” in Peter
Gregory (ed.), Traditions of Meditation in Chinese Buddhism, 99–128, Honolulu, HI:
University of Hawai’i Press.
Faure, Bernard (1991), The Rhetoric of Immediacy: A Cultural Critique of Chan/Zen
Buddhism, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Feer, M. Léon (1898), Saṃyutta-nikāya, vol. 5, London: Pali Text Society.
Ferrer, Jorge N. and Jacob H. Sherman, eds (2008), The Participatory Turn: Spirituality,
Mysticism, Religious Studies, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Feuerstein, Georg (2006), Holy Madness: Spirituality, Crazy-Wise Teachers, and
Enlightenment, revised and expanded edition, Prescott, AZ: Hohm Press.
Florida, Nancy (1995), Writing the Past, Inscribing the Future: History as Prophecy in
Colonial Java, Durham: Duke University Press.
Foulk, T. Griffith (1993), “Myth, Ritual, and Monastic Practice in Sung Ch’an Buddhism,”
in Patricia Buckley Ebrey and Peter N. Gregory (eds), Religion and Society in T’ang and
Sung China, 147–208, Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.
Foulks, Beverley (2008), “Duplicitous Thieves: Ouyi Zhixu’s Criticism of Jesuit
Missionaries in Late Imperial China,” Chung-Hwa Buddhist Journal, 21: 55–75.
Freedberg, David (1989), The Power of Images: Studies in the History and Theory of
Response, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Frohlich, Mary (2013), “Teresa of Avila’s Evolving Practices of ‘Representing’ Christ in
Prayer,” in Halvor Eifring (ed.), Meditation in Judaism, Christianity and Islam: Cultural
Histories, 137–51, London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Fuller C. J. (2001), “Orality, Literature, and Memorization: Priestly Education in
Contemporary South India,” Modern Asia Studies, 35 (1): 1–31.
Ganss, George, trans. & comm. (1992), The Spiritual Exercises of Saint Ignatius, St. Louis,
MO: Institute of Jesuit Sources.
Gāo Língfēn 高齡芬 (2010), “Hānshān dàshī ‘Lǎozǐ jiě’ zhī dàolùn yánjiū”
憨山大師《老子解》之道論研究, Xīngdà Zhōngwén Xuébào 興大中文學報, 27:
191–205.
Gardner, Daniel K., trans. (1990), Learning to Be a Sage: Selections from the Conversations
of Master Chu, Arranged Topically, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Geertz, Clifford (1968), Islam Observed: Religious Development in Morocco and Indonesia,
Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Geertz, Clifford (1976), The Religion of Java, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago
Press.
Gethin, Rupert (1992), The Buddhist Path to Awakening: A Study of the Bodhi-Pakkhiyā
Dhammā, Brill’s Indological Library, 7, Leiden: E. J. Brill.
Gethin, Rupert (2011), “On Some Definitions of Mindfulness,” Contemporary Buddhism,
12 (1): 263–79.
Gilsenan, Michael (1982), Recognizing Islam: An Anthropologist’s Introduction, London:
Croom Helm.
Gold, Daniel (1987), The Lord as Guru: Hindi Sants in North Indian Tradition, New York,
NY: Oxford University Press.
Gold, Daniel (2002), “Kabīr’s Secrets for Householders: Truths and Rumours among
Rajasthani Nāths,” in Monika Horstmann (ed.), Images of Kabīr, 143–56, New Delhi:
Manohar.
Gómez, Luis O. (1987), “Purifying Gold: The Metaphor of Effort and Intuition in Buddhist
Thought and Practice,” in Peter Gregory (ed.), Sudden and Gradual: Approaches to
Enlightenment in Chinese Thought, 67–165, Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.
Goodrich, L. Carrington (1942), “The Revolving Book-Case in China,” Harvard Journal of
Asiatic Studies, 7 (2): 130–61.
Goodrich, L. Carrington, ed. (1976), Dictionary of Ming Biography 1368-1644, vol. 2,
New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Goyal, M., S. Singh, E. M. S. Sibinga, N. F. Gould, A. Rowland-Seymour, R. Sharma,
Z. Berger, D. Sleicher, D. D. Maron, H. M. Shihab, P. D. Ranasinghe, S. Linns, S. Saha,
E. B. Bass, and J. A. Haythornthwaite (2014), “Meditation Programs for Psychological
Stress and Well-being: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis,” JAMA Internal
Medicine, 175: 357–68.
Graham, A. C. (1981), Chuang-tzu: The Seven Inner Chapters and Other Writings from the
Book of Chuang-tzu, London: Allan & Unwin.
Graham, A. C. (1989), Disputers of the Tao: Philosophical Argument in Ancient China,
LaSalle, IL: Open Court.
Greene, Eric (2008), “Another Look at Early Chan: Daoxuan, Bodhidharma, and the Three
Levels Movement,” T’oung Pao, 94: 49–114.
Greene, Eric (2012), “Meditation, Repentance, and Visionary Experience in Early
Medieval Chinese Buddhism,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Gregory, Peter (1991), Tsung-mi and the Sinification of Buddhism, Princeton, NJ: Princeton
University Press.
Griffiths, Paul John (1986), On Being Mindless: Buddhist Meditation and the Mind-Body
Problem, La Salle, IL: Open Court.
Griffiths, Paul John (1990), “Pure Consciousness and Indian Buddhism,” in Robert K. C.
Forman (ed.), The Problem of Pure Consciousness: Mysticism and Philosophy, 71–97,
New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Gǔ Qīngměi 古清美 (2004), “Cóng Jìnsīlù kàn Běi Sòng jǐ ge zhòngyào gàiniàn yǔ Yì
guà de guānxi,” 從《近思路》看北宋幾個重要概念與易卦的關係 in Gǔ Qīngměi,
Huìān lùnxuéjí 慧庵論學集, 1–40, Taipei: Dà’ān chūbǎnshè.
Guo, Qinghua (1999), “The Architecture of Joinery: The Form and Construction of
Rotating Sutra-Case Cabinets,” Architectural History, 42: 96–109.
Gusfield, Joseph R. (1967), “Tradition and Modernity: Misplaced Polarities in the Study of
Social Change,” American Journal of Sociology, 72 (4): 351–62.
Gyatso, Janet (1985), “The Development of the Gcod Tradition,” in Barbara N. Aziz and
Matthew Kapstein (eds), Soundings in Tibetan Civilization, 320–42, Delhi: Manohar.
Gyatso, Janet, ed. (1992), In the Mirror of Memory: Reflections on Mindfulness and
Remembrance in Indian and Tibetan Buddhism, SUNY Series in Buddhist Studies,
Albany, IL: State University of New York Press.
Harper, Donald (1998), Early Chinese Medical Manuscripts: The Mawangdui Medical
Manuscripts, London: Wellcome Asian Medical Monographs.
Harun Hadiwijono (1967), Man in the Present Javanese Mysticism, Baarn: Bosch and
Keuning.
Hasenkamp, W., C. D. Wilson-Mendenhall, E. Duncan, and L. W. Barsalou (2012), “Mind
Wandering and Attention during Focused Meditation: A Fine-Grained Temporal
Analysis of Fluctuating Cognitive States,” Neuroimage, 59: 750–60.
Hattori Masaaki (1968), Dignāga, On Perception, Being the Pratyakṣapariccheda of
Dignāga’s Pramāṇasamuccaya from the Sanskrit Fragments and the Tibetan Versions,
Harvard Oriental Series no. 47, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Havnevik, Hanna (1999), “The Life of Jetsun Lochen Rinpoche (1865-1951) as Told in Her
Autobiography,” PhD dissertation, University of Oslo.
Havnevik, Hanna (2015), “Female Temple Founders, Ritualists, and Clairvoyants in
Post-Socialist Mongolian Buddhism,” paper presented at the symposium “Women as
Visionaries, Healers and Poisoners: Autonomous Female Religious Specialists in Tibet,
the Himalayas and Inner Asia,” Humboldt University, Berlin, May 2013.
Havnevik, Hanna, Ragchaa Byambaa, and Agata Bareja-Starzyńska (2007), “Practices
of the Buddhist Red Tradition in Contemporary Mongolia,” in Uradyn E. Bulag
and Hildegard G. M. Diemberger (eds), The Mongolia-Tibet Interface: Opening New
Research Terrains in Inner Asia, 223–39, Leiden: Brill.
Headley, Stephen (2004), Durga’s Mosque: Cosmology, Conversion and Community in
Central Javanese Islam, Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Hefner, Robert (2000), Civil Islam: Muslims and Democratization in Indonesia, Princeton,
NJ: Princeton University Press.
Heller, Natasha (2014), Illusory Abiding: The Cultural Construction of the Chan Monk
Zhongfeng Mingben, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center.
Hendrischke, Barbara (2006), The Scripture on Great Peace: The Taiping jing and the
Beginnings of Daoism, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Hirst, Jacqueline (1996), “Strategies of Interpretation: Samkara’s Commentary on
‘Brhadaranyakopanisad’,” Journal of the American Oriental Society, 116: 58–75.
Hŏ Chun, ed. (1998), Wŏnbo Tongŭi pogam, Seoul: Namsandang.
Hŏ Chun, ed. (2013), Tongui Bogam: Treasured Mirror of Eastern Medicine, Seoul:
Ministry of Health and Welfare.
Hŏ Kyun (1972), Hŏ Kyun Chŏnjip, Seoul: Sŏnggyunkwan University Taedong Munhwa
Yŏn’guso.
Hodgson, Phyllis, ed. (1958), The Cloud of Unknowing and The Book of Privy Counselling,
London: Oxford University Press.
Hofmann, S. G., P. Grossman, and D. E. Hinton (2011), “Loving-kindness and
Compassion Meditation: Potential for Psychological Interventions,” Clinical Psychology
Review, 31: 1126–32.
Holen, Are (2007), Inner Strength: The Free Mental Attitude in Acem Meditation, 2nd edn,
Oslo: Acem Publishing.
LeVine, Sarah, and David N. Gellner (2005), Rebuilding Buddhism: The Theravada
Movement in Twentieth-century Nepal, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lǐ Guāngdì 李光地 (1983), “Jì Zhōuzǐ tōngshu zúzhāng 記周子通書卒章,” in Lǐ Guāngdì
(ed.), Róngcūn jí 榕村集, Jǐng’yìn wényuāngé sìkù quánshū 景印文淵閣四部叢刊,
Taipei: Táiwān Shāngwù yìnshūguǎn.
Lí Jìngdé 黎靖德, ed. (2007), Zhūzǐ yǔlèi 朱子語類, Beijing: Zhōnghuá shūjú.
Lǐ Líng 李零 (1993), Zhōngguó fāngshù kǎo 中國方術考, Beijing: Rénmín chūbǎnshè.
Lǐ Tóng 李侗 (1936), Lǐ Yánpíng jí 李延平集, Cóngshū jíchéng chūbiān 叢書集成初編,
Shanghai: Shànghǎi shāngwù yìnshūguǎn.
Lǐ Yuándù 李元度 (1965), “Hé Wén’ān Gōng shìlüè 何文安公事略,” in Lǐ Yuándù (ed.),
Guócháo xiānzhèng shìlüè 國朝先正事略, vol. 3, sec. 24, 21a, Taipei: Táiwān Zhōnghuá
shūjú.
Lǐ Zhì 李贄 (1974), Xù Fénshū 續焚書, Beijing: Zhōnghuá shūjú.
Lín Wénbīn 林文彬 (2001), “Shì Déqīng ‘Guān Lǎo Zhuāng yǐngxiǎnglùn’” 釋德清《觀老
莊影響論》, Wénshǐ xuébào 文史學報, 31: 15–33.
Linrothe, Rob, ed. (2006), Holy Madness: Portraits of Tantric Siddhas, New York, NY:
Rubin Museum of Art.
Lo, Yuet Keung (2008), “Change Beyond Syncretism: Ouyi Zhixu’s Buddhist
Hermeneutics of the Yijing,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 35 (2): 273–95.
Lu, K’uan Yü (Charles Luk) (1971), Practical Buddhism, London: Rider & Company.
Lutz, A., H. A. Slagter, J. D. Dunne, and R. J. Davidson (2008), “Attention Regulation and
Monitoring in Meditation,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12: 163–9.
Lutz, Catherine (1988), Unnatural Emotions: Everyday Sentiments on a Micronesian Atoll
& Their Challenge to Western Theory, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Mahātmāoṃ kī Bānī (1933), Bhurkura, Gazipur: Baba Rambaran Das Saheb.
Mahony, William K. (1987), “Karman: Hindu and Jain Concepts,” in Mircea Eliade (ed.),
Encyclopedia of Religion, vol. 8, 261–6, New York, NY: Macmillan.
Malūkdās and Baladeva Vaṃśi (2002), Santa Malūka Granthāvalī, Delhi: Parameśvarī
Prakāśan.
Manji Shinsan Dainihon Zokuzōkyō 卍新纂大日本續藏經, Tokyo: Kokusho kankōkai,
1975–89.
Manna, A., A. Raffone, M. G. Perrucci, D. Nardo, A. Ferretti, A. Tartaro, A. Londai,
C. Del Gratta, M. O. Belardinelli, and G. L. Romani (2010), “Neural Correlates of Focused
Attention and Cognitive Monitoring in Meditation,” Brain Research Bulletin, 82: 46–56.
Manocha, R., D. Black, J. Sarris, and C. Stough (2011), “A Randomized, Controlled Trial
of Meditation for Work Stress, Anxiety and Depressed Mood in Full-Time Workers,”
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 960583: 1–8.
Martin, Dan (2005), “The Woman Illusion? Research into the Lives of Spiritually
Accomplished Women Leaders of the 11th and 12th Centuries,” in Janet Gyatso and
Hanna Havnevik (eds), Women in Tibet, 49–83, London: Hurst.
Mason, M. F., M. I. Norton, J. D. Van Horn, D. M. Wegner, S. T. Grafton and C. N. Macrae
(2007), “Wandering Minds: The Default Network and Stimulus-Independent Thought,”
Science, 315: 393–5.
Massignon, Louis (1982), The Passion of al-Hallaj: Mystic and Martyr of Islam, vol. I,
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Matilal, Bimal Krishna (1986), Perception: An Essay on Classical Indian Theories of
Knowledge, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
McGuire, Beverley Foulks (2014), Living Karma: The Religious Practices of Ouyi Zhixu,
New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Orofino, Giacomella (2000), “The Great Wisdom Mother and the gCod Tradition,” in
David G. White (ed.), Tantra in Practice, 396–417, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University
Press.
Ospina, Maria B., K. Bond, M. Karkhaneh, L. Tjosvold, B. Vandermeer, Y. Liang, L. Bialy,
N. Hooton, N. Buscemi, D. M. Dryden, and T. P. Klassen (2007), Meditation Practice
for Health: State of the Research, AHRQ Publication No. 07-E010, Rockville MD:
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. http://www.ahrq.gov.
Ottaviani, C., D. Shapiro, and A. Couyoumdjian (2013), “Flexibility as the Key for
Somatic Health: From Mind Wandering to Perseverative Cognition,” Biological
Psychology, 94: 38–43.
Pak, Pyŏngsu (1996), “Chosŏn sidae togyo chŏng.ki.shinnon ŭi chŏn’gae yangsang,” in
Han’guk togyo sasang yŏn’guhoe (ed.), Togyo ŭi Han’gukchŏk pyŏnyong, 341–67, Seoul:
Asea Munhwasa.
Palmer, G. E. H., Philip Sherrard, and Kallistos Ware, ed. and trans. (1979–99), Philokalia:
The Complete Text Compiled by St Nikodimos of the Holy Mountain and St Makarios of
Corinth, vol. 4, London: Faber and Faber.
Palṭū Sāhib (1974), Palṭū Sāhib kī Bānī, vol. 3, Sant Bānī Pustakmālā, Allahabad: Belvedere
Press.
Park, J., R. H. Lyles, and S. Bauer-Wu (2014), “Mindfulness Meditation Lowers Muscle
Sympathetic Nerve Activity and Blood Pressure in African-American Males with
Chronic Kidney Disease,” American Journal of Regulatory Integrative and Comparative
Physiology, 307: R93–101.
Pemberton, John (1994), On the Subject of “Java,” Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Pennington, M. Basil (2001), Centering Prayer: Renewing an Ancient Christian Prayer
Form, 2nd edn, New York, NY: Doubleday.
Perry, Mark (2000), On Awakening and Remembering: To Know Is to Be, Louisville, KY:
Fons Vitae.
Pregadio, Fabrizio, ed. (2008), The Encyclopedia of Taoism, London: Routledge.
Pregadio, Fabrizio (2014), “Cinnabar fields,” http://www.goldenelixir.com/jindan/dantian.
html and “An Introduction to Taoist Alchemy,” http://www.goldenelixir.com/jindan/
jindan_intro.html (accessed April 30, 2014).
Prentiss, Karen Pechilis (1996), “A Tamil Lineage for Śaiva Siddhānta philosophy,” History
of Religions, 35 (3): 231–57.
Raharjo Suwandi (2000), A Quest for Justice: The Millenary Aspirations of a Contemporary
Javanese Wali, Leiden: KITLV Press.
Ratey, John J. (2002), A User’s Guide to the Brain: Perception, Attention, and the Four
Theaters of the Brain, New York, NY: Vintage Books.
Renard, John (1996), Seven Doors to Islam: Spirituality and the Religious Life of Muslims,
Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Ricard, Matthieu (1994), The Life of Shabkar: The Autobiography of a Tibetan Yogin,
Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Rickett, W. Allyn (1998), Kuan Tzu: A Repository of Early Chinese Thought, vol. 2,
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Robinet, Isabelle (1979), Méditation Taoïste, Paris: Albin Michel.
Robinet, Isabelle (1989), “Visualization and Ecstatic Flight in Shangqing Taoism,” in Livia
Kohn (ed.), Taoist Meditation and Longevity Techniques, 157–90, Ann Arbor, MI:
University of Michigan Press.
Robinet, Isabelle (1993), Taoist Meditation: The Mao-shan Tradition of Great Purity, trans.
Julian Pas and Norman Girardot, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Rønning, Monika (2005), “The Path of Machig Labdron: gCod, Its History, Philosophy and
Contemporary Practice in Central Tibet,” MA thesis, University of Oslo.
Rorty, Richard (1979), Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Princeton, NJ: Princeton
University Press.
Rosaldo, Michelle (1980), Knowledge and Passion: Ilongot Notions of Self & Social Life,
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rosenberg, Larry (1999), Breath by Breath: The Liberating Practice of Insight Meditation,
Boston, MA: Shambhala.
Roth, Harold D. (1991), “Psychology and Self-cultivation in Early Taoist Thought,”
Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, 51 (2): 599–650.
Roth, Harold D. (1997), “Evidence for Stages of Meditation in Early Taoism,” Bulletin of
the School of Oriental and African Studies, 60: 295–314.
Roth, Harold D. (1999), Original Tao: Inward Training (Nei-yeh) and the Foundations of
Taoist Mysticism, New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Roth, Harold D. (2000), “Bimodal Mystical Experience in the ‘Qiwulun’ Chapter of
Zhuangzi,” Journal of Chinese Religions, 28: 31–50.
Roth, Harold D. (2016), “Meditation in the Classical Daoist Tradition,” in Halvor Eifring
(ed.), Asian Traditions of Meditation, Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.
Rotsaert, Mark, S. J., trans. (1994), Ignatius van Loyola Geestelijke Oefeningen, Averbode:
Averbode Publisher.
Rudnyickyj, Daromir (2010), Spiritual Economies: Islam, Globalization, and the Afterlife of
Development, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Samuels, Mike and Nancy Samuels (1975), Seeing with the Mind’s Eye: The History,
Technique, and Uses of Visualization, New York, NY: Random House.
Sanderson, Alexis (2009), “The Śaiva Age: The Rise and Dominance of Śaivism during the
Early Medieval Period,” in Shingo Einoo (ed.), Genesis and Development of Tantrism,
Tokyo: Institute of Oriental Culture, University of Tokyo.
Sant Mansingh (1976), Divya-rahasya-prakāś: adhyātm parak nibaṃdhoṃ kā saṃgrah,
Gwalior: Divine Charitable Society, Adhyatm Niketan.
Sartono Kartodirdjo (1973), Protest Movements in Rural Java, Singapore: Oxford
University Press.
Saso, Michael (2000), Zen is for Everyone: The Xiao Zhiguan Text by Zhiyi, Carmel, CA:
New Life Center.
Schafer, Edward H. (1980), Mao-shan in T’ang Times, Boulder CO: Society for the Study of
Chinese Religions Monograph 1.
Schipper, Kristofer and Franciscus Verellen, eds (2004), The Taoist Canon: A Historical
Companion to the Daozang, vol. 3, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Schlütter, Morten (2008), How Zen Became Zen: The Dispute over Enlightenment and the
Formation of Chan Buddhism in Song-Dynasty China, Honolulu, HI: University of
Hawai’i Press.
Schlütter, Morten (2013), “‘Who is Reciting the Name of the Buddha?’ as Gongan in
Chinese Chan Buddhism,” Frontiers of History in China, 8 (3): 366–88.
Schlütter, Morten, (2016), “Kànhuà (Keyword) Meditation in Chinese Zen,” in Halvor
Eifring (ed.), Asian Traditions of Meditation, Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i
Press.
Schopen, Gregory (2005), “A Note on the ‘Technology of Prayer’ and a Reference to a
‘Revolving Bookcase’ in an Eleventh-Century Indian Inscription,” in Gregory Schopen
(ed.), Figments and Fragments of Mahāyāna Buddhism in India: More Collected Papers,
345–49, Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.
Sears, Laurie (1996), Shadows of Empire: Colonial Discourse and Javanese Tales, Durham,
NC: Duke University Press.
Sedlmeier, P., J. Eberth, M. Schwarz, D. Zimmermann, F. Haarig, S. Jaeger, S. Kunze
(2012), “The Psychological Effects of Meditation: A Meta-analysis,” Psychology Bulletin,
138: 1139–71.
Segal, Alan F. (1977), Two Powers in Heaven: Early Rabbinic Reports about Christianity and
Gnosticism, Leiden: Brill.
Segal, Z. V., J. M. G. Williams, and J. D. Teasdale (2012), Mindfulness-Based Cognitive
Thearpy for Depression, 2nd edn, New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Shapiro, Deane N. and Roger N. Walsh (1984), Meditation: Classic and Contemporary
Perspectives, New York, NY: Aldine.
Sharf, Robert H. (1995), “Buddhist Modernism and the Rhetoric of Meditative
Experience,” Numen, 42 (3): 228–3.
Sharf, Robert H. (1998), “Experience,” in Mark C. Taylor (ed.), Critical Terms for Religious
Studies, 94–116, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Sharf, Robert H. (2002a), Coming to Terms with Chinese Buddhism: A Reading of the
Treasure Store Treatise, Kuroda Institute Studies in East Asian Buddhism, no. 14,
Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.
Sharf, Robert H. (2002b), “On Pure Land Buddhism and Ch’an/Pure Land Syncretism in
Medieval China,” T’oung Pao, 86: 282–331.
Sharf, Robert H. (2007), “How to Think with Chan Gong’an,” in Charlotte Furth, Judith
Zeitlin, and Hsiung Ping-chen (eds), Thinking with Cases: Specialized Knowledge in
Chinese Cultural History, 205–43, Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.
Sharf, Robert H. (2014), “Is Nirvāṇa the Same as Insentience? Chinese Struggles with an
Indian Buddhist Ideal,” in John Kieschnick and Meir Shahar (eds), India in the Chinese
Imagination: Myth, Religion, and Thought, 141–70, Philadelphia, PN: University of
Pennsylvania Press.
Sheng Yen 聖嚴法師 (2009a), Míng mò Zhōngguó fójiào zhī yánjiū 明末中國佛教之研究,
trans. Shì Huìjìng 釋會靖, Taipei: Fǎgǔ wénhuà.
Sheng Yen 聖嚴法師 (2009b), Míng mò fójiào yánjiū 明末佛教研究, 3rd edn, Taipei: Fǎgǔ
wénhuà.
Shì Yìnqiān 釋印謙 (1999), “Chán zōng ‘niàn fó zhě shì shéi’ gōng’àn qǐyuán kǎo”
禪宗”念佛者是誰”起源考, Yuánguāng fóxué xuébào 圓光佛學學報, 4: 108–38.
Shǐ Zhēntáo 史甄陶 (2012), “Dōngyà rújiā jìngzuò yánjiū zhī gàikuàng” 東亞儒家靜
坐研究之概況, in Yang, Mabuchi and Eifring (eds), Dōngyà de jìngzuò chuántǒng
東亞的靜坐傳統, 27–61, Taipei: National Taiwan University Press.
Shih, Heng-ching (1987), “Yung-ming’s Syncretism of Pure Land and Ch’an,” The Journal
of the International Association of Buddhist Studies, 10 (1): 117–34.
Shih, Heng-ching (1992), The Syncretism of Ch’an and Pure Land Buddhism, New York,
NY: Peter Lang.
Shin, Junhyoung Michael (2009), “The Reception of Evangelicae Historiae Imagines in
Late Ming China: Visualising Holy Topography in Jesuit Spirituality and Pure Land
Buddhism,” Sixteenth Century Journal, XL/2: 303–33.
Shinohara Hisao 篠原壽雄 and Tanaka Ryōshō 田中良昭, eds (1980), Tonkō butten to zen
敦煌佛典と禪, Kōza Tonkō 講座敦煌 8, Tokyo: Daitō shuppansha.
Shulman, David and Guy S. Stroumsa, eds (2002), Self and Self-transformation in the
History of Religions, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shulman, Eviatar (2010), “Mindful Wisdom: The Sati-paṭṭhāna-sutta on Mindfulness,
Memory, and Liberation,” History of Religions, 49 (4): 393–420.
Shyam Lal [Guru Data Dayala] (1923), Retransformation of Self, Lashkar, Gwalior: G. S.
Niwas.
Simuh (1995), Sufisme Jawa: Transformasi Tasawuf Islam ke Mistik Jawa, Yogyakarta: Bentang.
Smith, Jeffrey Chipps (2002), Sensuous Worship: Jesuits and the Art of the Early Catholic
Reformation in Germany, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Snellgrove, David (1987), Indo-Tibetan Buddhism: Indian Buddhists and Their Tibetan
Successors, London: Serindia Publications.
Soni, R. L. (1980), The Only Way to Deliverance, Boulder, CO: Prajna Press.
Sood, A. and D. T. Jones (2013), “On Mind Wandering, Attention, Brain Networks, and
Meditation,” Explore, 9: 136–41.
Soothill, William E. and Lewis Hudous (1937), A Dictionary of Chinese Buddhist Terms,
London: Kegan Paul.
Sorensen, Michelle J. (2010), “The Body Extraordinary: Embodied Praxis, Vajrayoginī,
and Buddhist Gcod,” in Saadet Arslan and Peter Schwieger (eds), Tibetan Studies: An
Anthology [PIATS 2006. Tibetan Studies: Proceedings of the Eleventh Seminar of the
International Association for Tibetan Studies, Königswinter 2006], 439–57, IITBS:
International Institute for Tibetan Studies.
Standaert, Nicolas (1999), “The Bible in Early Seventeenth-Century China,” in I. Eber, S.
K. Wan, and K. Walf (eds), Bible in Modern China: The Literary and Intellectual Impact,
31–54, Nettetal: Steyler Verlag.
Standaert, Nicolas (2007a), An Illustrated Life of Christ Presented to the Chinese Emperor:
The History of Jincheng shuxiang (1640), Monumenta Serica Monograph Series LIX,
Sankt Augustin and Nettetal: Steyler Verlag.
Standaert, Nicolas (2007b), “The Composition of Place: Creating Space for an Encounter,”
The Way, 46 (1): 7–20.
Standaert, Nicolas 鐘鳴旦 and Ad Dudink 杜鼎克, eds (2002), Yēsūhuì Luómǎ
dǎng’ànguǎn Míng-Qīng tiānzhǔjiào wénxiàn 耶穌會羅馬檔案館明清天主教文獻
(Chinese Christian Texts from the Roman Archives of the Society of Jesus), vol. 12, Taipei:
Ricci Institute.
Standaert, Nicolas 鐘鳴旦, Ad Dudink 杜鼎克, and Nathalie Monnet 蒙曦,
eds (2009), Fǎguó guójiā túshūguǎn Míng-Qīng Tiānzhǔjiào wénxiàn
法國國家圖書館明清天主教文獻, Taipei: Ricci Institute.
Stange, Paul (1980), The Sumarah Movement in Javanese Mysticism, PhD thesis, University
of Wisconsin-Madison.
Stange, Paul (1984), “The Logic of Rasa in Java,” Indonesia, 38: 113–34.
Stange, Paul (1986), “‘Legitimate’ Mysticism in Indonesia,” Review of Indonesian and
Malaysian Affairs, 20 (2): 76–117.
Stange, Paul (1991), “Deconstruction as Disempowerment: New Orientalisms of Java,”
Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, 23 (3): 51–71.
Stange, Paul (1998), Politik Perhatian: Rasa dalam Kebudayaan Jawa, Yogyakarta: LKiS.
Stange, Paul (2009), Kejawen Modern: Hakikat dalam Penghayatan Sumarah, Yogyakarta:
LKiS/Lembaga Kajian Islam dan Sosial.
Struve, Lynn (2012), “Deqing’s Dreams: Signs in a Reinterpretation of His Autobiography,”
Journal of Chinese Religions, 40: 1–44.
Subramanium, Sri Anna (2003), Srirudram, Mylapore, Chennai: Ramakrishna Mission
Press.
Suresh, K. (2002), Srirudra Ghanam, Mandaveli, Chennai: Latha.
Suzuki Daisetsu Teitarō 鈴木大拙貞太郎 (1968-1971), Suzuki Daisetsu zenshū
鈴木大拙全集, 32 vols, Tokyo: Iwanami shoten.
Yang Rur-bin 楊儒賓 (2012), “Zhǔjìng yǔ zhǔjìng 主敬與主靜,” in Yang, Mabuchi and
Eifring (eds), Dōngyà de jìngzuò chuántǒng 東亞的靜坐傳統, 129–59, Taipei: National
Taiwan University Press.
Yang Rur-bin 楊儒賓 (ms), Lǐxué jìng-zuò lùn xuǎnbiān 理學靜坐論選編.
Yang Rur-bin 楊儒賓, Masaya Mabuchi 馬淵昌也, and Halvor Eifring 艾皓德 (2012),
Dōngyà de jìngzuò chuántǒng 東亞的靜坐傳統, Taipei: National Taiwan University
Press.
Yao, Zhihua (2005), The Buddhist Theory of Self-Cognition, London: Routledge.
Yi Ch’ŏlwan, trans. (1993), Hwarin simbang, Seoul: Iljungsa.
Yi Chongǔn (1988), “Sokyǒksŏ kwan’gye yŏksa charyo kŏmt’o,” in Chosŏn togyo sasang
yŏn’guhoe (ed.), Togyo wa Han’guk munhwa, 87–190, Seoul: Asea munhwasa.
Yi Kyugyŏng (1959), Oju yŏnmun changjŏn san’go, Seoul: Tongguk munhwasa.
Yi Nŭnghwa (1977), Chosŏn Togyosa, trans. Yi Chongŭn, Seoul: Posŏng munhwasa.
Yi Sugwang (1975), Chibong yusŏl, trans. Nam Mansŏng, Seoul: Ŭryu Munhwasa.
Yi, Chinsu (1988), “Chosŏn yangsaeng sasang ŭi sŏngnip-e kwanhan koch’al (I),” in
Han’guk Togyo sasang yŏn’guhoe (ed.), Togyo wa Han’guk munhwa, 190–258, Seoul:
Asea munhwasa.
Yi, Chinsu (1992), “T’oegye chŏ’lhak ŭi yangsaeng sasang-e kwanhan yŏn’gu,” Han’guk
Togyo ŭi hyŏndaejk chomyŏng, 81–142, Seoul: Asea munhwasa.
Yi, Chinsu (1999), Han’guk ngsaeng sasang yŏn’gu, Seoul: Hanyang University Press.
Yi, Chinsu (2003), “Yonghogyŏl-e Kwanhayŏ,” Togyo munhwa yŏn’gu, 19: 97–142.
Yogi, Maharishi Mahesh (1963), The Science of Being and Art of Living, New Delhi: Allied
Publishers.
Yogiraj Nanak, Swami (2003), Dehypnotic Meditation, Delhi: Pustak Mahal.
Yü, Chün-fang (1979), “Ta-hui Tsung-kao and Kung-an Chan,” Journal of Chinese
Philosophy, 6: 211–35.
Yü, Chün-fang (1981), The Renewal of Buddhism in China: Chu-hung and the Late Ming
Synthesis, New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Yuán Liǎofán 袁了凡 (2013), Jìngzuò yàojué 靜坐要訣, ed. Yán Wèibīng 嚴蔚冰, Taipei:
Dàzhǎn.
Zacchetti, Stefano (2003), “The Rediscovery of Three Early Buddhist Scriptures on
Meditation: A Preliminary Analysis of the Fo shuo shi’er men jing, the Fo shuo jie shi’er
men jing Translated by Ān Shìgāo and Their Commentary Preserved in the Newly
Found Kongō-ji Manuscript,” Annual Report of The International Research Institute for
Advanced Buddhology at Soka University for the Academic Year 2002, (6): 251–99.
Zacchetti, Stefano (2008), “A ‘New’ Early Chinese Buddhist Commentary: The Nature
of the Da anban shouyi jing 大安般守意經 (T 602) Reconsidered,” Journal of the
International Association of Buddhist Studies, 31 (1–2): 421–84.
Zēng Guófān 曾國藩 (1995), “Jiāshū: Zhì zhūdì 家書 · 致諸弟,” in Zēng Guófān (ed.),
Zēng Wénzhèng Gōng jí 曾文正公集, Shanghai: Shànghǎi gǔjí chūbǎnshè.
Zeuschner, Robert Bruce (1983), “ The Concept of Li Nien (‘Being Free from
Thinking’) in the Northern Line of Ch’an Buddhism,” in Whalen Lai and Lewis R.
Lancaster (eds), Early Ch’an in China and Tibet, 131–48, Berkeley, CA: University
of California Press.
Zhāng Yǒng 張勇 (2000), Fù dàshì yánjiū 傅大士研究, Chengdu: Bāshǔ shūshè.
Zhāng Zǎi 張載 (1978), Zhāng Zǎi jí 張載集, Beijing: Zhōnghuá shūjú.
Zhào Shùnsūn 趙順孫 (1972), Sì shū zuǎn shū—Zhōng yōng zuǎn shū 四書纂疏 ·
中庸纂疏, Taipei: Xīnxīng shūjú.
Zhū Xī 朱熹 (2000), Zhūzǐ wén jí 朱子文集, Taipei: Défù wénjiāo jījīnhuì.
Ziporyn, Brook (2004), “Mohe zhiguan,” in Robert Buswell (ed.), The Encyclopedia of
Buddhism, 548–9, New York, NY: Macmillan.
Zoetmulder, P. J. (1995 [1935]), Pantheism and Monism in Javanese Suluk Literature:
Islamic and Indian Mysticism in an Indonesian Setting, Leiden: KITLV Press.
Zürcher, Erik (1980), “Buddhist Influence on Early Taoism,” T’oung Pao, 66: 84–147.
Zürcher, Erik, trans. (2007), Kouduo richao: Li Jiubiao’s Diary of Oral Admonitions, A
Late Ming Christian Journal, Monumenta Serica Monograph Series LXI, 2 vols, Sankt
Augustin and Nettetal: Steyler Verlag.
Zvelebil, K. (1993), The Poets of the Powers: Magic, Freedom, and Renewal, Lower Lake,
CA: Integral Publishing.
Malik Sahib, see Kushwant, Thakur mind wandering 37, 41–7, 50, 114,
Mansingh 200–3, 206, 211, 213–15, see also
Mallery, Karel van 26 spontaneous mental activity/thoughts
mantra 44–5, 47–9, 51, 62, 102, 111–4, Míngběn, see Zhōngfēng Míngběn
116–7, 119–21, 123–4, 126, 139–41, Mingun Jetavana Sayādaw 63
149, 154, 186–7, 195, 204, 214 mòcún 33–4
Matos, Bento de 30 modes of attention 37, 41, 43, 45, 47–50
meditation, see also biomedical perspective modernity, meditation and, 5–6, 36–50
of meditation; Chán; Chöd; insight monism 7, 103, 144, 148–56, 187–8, 191,
meditation; yoga 193, 208, 213
biomedical classification 47 mòxiǎng 30, 33–4
chanting as 25, 64, 120, 186–99 mòzhào, see silent illumination
clinical effects 49–50 muscular relaxation 39
concentrative 25, 34, 44, 47, 49, 105 Muslim, see Islam
(see also śamatha, focused attention) Muthukumaraswamy, M. D. 4–5, 8, 186
dimensions for describing 48–9
focused attention 36, 38, 41, Nadal, Jerome 26–9, 33
45–8, 50–1 (see also concentrative Annotations and Meditations on the
meditation) Gospels 26, 28
guided 41, 152, 156 Namakam 194–5, 198
Jesuit practices 5–7, 9, 26–35 Namgung Tu 168–9
mindfulness 7, 12, 22, 25, 37–9, 41–2, Nanak, Yogiraj, see Chand, Nanak
45–7, 49, 51, 53, 55–75, 171, 204, Nath, Gorakh 132
214–15 Nath yogis 7, 132, 136–7
in modern contexts 5–6, 36–50 Neo-Confucianism 6–7, 32, 53, 76–101
modes of attention 37, 41, 43, Niranjan 136, 141–2
45, 47–50 nirguṇa bhakti 132, 138
monism and dualism 7, 149–56, nirodhasamāpatti 66
187–8, 191, 193 nirvikalpa samādhi 139
as a national practice in Java 158–9 non-conceptual awareness 66, 224n. 33
negative valuation of 56 nondirective meditation 28, 37, 41, 43–51
Neo-Confucian practices 6, 53, 76–101 nondualism 43, 85, 103, 106, 153,
nondirective 28, 37, 41, 43–51 211, 213
pragmatic classification 49 no-self 4, 20–1, 23
recorded instructions 41 Nyanaponika Thera 63–4, 66
self-administered 40–1
spontaneous mental activity 41–2 oblivion, see sitting in oblivion,
(see also mind wandering) Zuòwàng lùn
Meykaṇṭatēvar 188 observing self 11
Milindapañha 65 open monitoring 41, 45–8, 50–1, see also
mindfulness 7, 12, 22, 25, 37–9, 41–2, inner observation, insight meditation,
45–7, 49, 51, 53, 55–75, 171, 204, Vipassana
214–15, see also sati/smṛti Ǒuyì Zhìxù 102, 116
mindfulness-based cognitive therapy
(MBCT) 38–9, 41, 47, 49 Paltu Sahib of Ayodhya 143
mindfulness-based stress reduction pañcākṣara mantra 186
(MBSR) 38–9, 41, 47, 49 pamong 150, 152–3
mindlessness 7, 55–75 Passeri, Bernardino 26
Path of Purification 63, 65
attitude toward spontaneous Zen 38, 47, 49, 55–6, 60, 74–5, 81, 166,
thoughts in 202 169, 210, 214, see also Chán, Sǒn,
duality between puruṣa and Thiền
prakṛti 202 Zēng Guófān 230n. 64
karmic imprints 203 Zhìyǐ, see Tiāntāi Zhìyǐ
means of stilling the fluctuations of Zhōngfēng Míngběn 102, 111, 117–18,
the mind 204 121, 125–6
qualities of existence 203 Zhōngguó jīběn gǔjí kù 33
samādhi state 204 Zhōu Dūnyí 77, 85–6, 93
terms and conditions for Yogic Zhōuyì cāntóngqì, see Cāntóng qì
realization 202–3 Zǐbó Zhēnkě 102
theistic approaches to Zhū Quán 168
meditation 204–5 Zhū Xī 32, 34, 76–7, 79–84, 87, 91, 93,
Yuán Liǎofán 102, 117, 126 96–101, 166
Yùfēng Gǔkūn 210–13 Discussion on Observing the Mind 81
Yúnqī Zhūhóng 102, 115–16 Zōngmì, see Guīfēng Zōngmì
Yúnjí qīqiān 17 Zuòwàng lùn 16–18, see also sitting in
oblivion