SAP EWM Case Study
SAP EWM Case Study
SAP EWM Case Study
May 7 – 9, 2019
Agenda
✓ About the speakers
✓ Applied Industrial Technologies overview
✓ Building the business case for SAP EWM
‒ Software evaluation, business benefits, ROI
✓ Avoid “lift and shift”— Focus on supply chain operating pillars
✓ Warehouse operational improvement assessment – key findings
✓ Deployment plan/agile approach
✓ Lessons learned
✓ Q&A
About the speakers:
Tracie Longpre
Vice President, Supply Chain
Applied Industrial Technologies
Supply Chain;
2 SAP Projects;
Procurement
2014
2007
MBA 1999
Retail
1992
Sales
Finance
Mobile: +1 215 630 4213 | [email protected] Mobile: +1 773 230 6349 | [email protected]
Philadelphia Chicago
Key outcomes/objectives
1. Hear how Applied® leveraged a combination of business, IT
and strategic factors to build a business case for SAP
Extended Warehouse Management (EWM)
2. Learn how Applied® avoided a “lift and shift” approach to
deploy a step change transformation across their supply
chain
3. Understand key lessons learned and how organizations can
optimize their operations
Applied Industrial Technologies overview
A leading value-added distributor of bearings, power transmission products, engineered
fluid power components and systems, specialty flow control solutions and other industrial
supplies serving customers in virtually every industry.
(MSS)
- Average DC Size
110,000 sq ft w/
35K SKUs and
$17m in inventory
Building the business case for SAP EWM
✓ Six distribution centers operating a 20+ year old
legacy WMS solution
‒ Highly customized and very expensive to
modify
✓ Current WMS lacks advanced functionality
‒ No Labor management, cross-docking, slotting
✓ One paper-based DC with current distribution
cost as a percent to sales is greater than 10%
‒ The goal is to lower distribution cost to less
than 2.5% cost of sales
The net result of these combined factors identified a business case with
significant annual savings
Building the business case – WMS software
evaluation
Core capability Wt Core capability Wt Technical Wt Vendor Wt
Years in business 0.5
SAP EWM selected
Tool sophistication/ease of use 2 Kitting standard 2 Seamless/touch-free
SAP integration
5
No significant cautions in Dunn based on:
Inbound receiving 2 Picking/Wave management 2 and Bradstreet Report or 0.5
Cross-docking 2 Ship manifest financial statement notes • Technical integration
Replenishment 2 5
integration
Quality inspection process 2
Packing/shipping 2
Consistent financial position
over last three years
0.5 • Cost
Put-away management 2
Returns processing 2 Reporting – dashboards, KPI
Infrastructure 5
Equity/Asset at least 30%; equity
0.5 • Functionality
5 /debt at least 50%
centric, many standard offerings
Slotting capabilities 4
Batch processing 4
Percentage of $ allocated to • Strength in company
0.5
Labor management standard 4 Ship manifest integration 4 Backorder processing 4 R&D for product
Cross ✓ Systemic capability does not exist ✓ Systemic movement of inbound freight to proper
docking ✓ Off-line manual process shipping lanes - DC to DC; DC to SCs
✓ Receiving efficiencies
Robust ✓ Basic Access database ✓ Standard network reporting, cockpits and exception
reporting ✓ Reporting with silo ownership reporting
✓ Empowered DC management
✓ Only one UOM (EA) is available today ✓ Expand limit of one UOM (EA) to various UOMs
Flexible UOMs ✓ Tribal knowledge used to determine ✓ Improve picking accuracy with UOM picking
pick UOM differentiation – 1 EA means 1 EA or 1 EA means 1 CS
Building the business case - Labor management
drives productivity and costs savings
Labor management program savings can be significant
Slotting ✓ Systemic capability does not exist ✓ Verify ideal placement/storage of parts in the DC
optimization ✓ Off-line manual process ✓ Drive efficiency in picking and receiving
Quality audit/ ✓ Limited lot control/formal quality ✓ Enable part inspections and part lot control functionality
lot control inspection functionality ✓ Support technical customer requirements or federal regulations
DC redesign ✓ Limited in ability to integrate with ✓ Expanded functional capabilities to enable operational maturity
support newer technology ✓ Integral machine control capabilities and ability to support
integration with new warehouse control systems and other
technology, such as native SAP connectivity through MFS
✓ No standard linkage to outside
Ship manifest ✓ Move to one uniform manifest system
manifest system
interface ✓ Avoid current state implementation costs with standard linkages
✓ Estimated $500K customization cost
to interface ✓ Eliminate dual maintenance and support
Building the business case – SAP EWM benefits
Benefit Current situation SAP EWM
✓ Systemic capability does not exist ✓ Pick directly into right-sized shipping cartons
Cartonization ✓ Eliminate double handling
✓ Systemic capability does not exist ✓ Build part kits from open stock (standard or customer specified)
Kitting
✓ Reduce costs for enhancements and upgrades by eliminating reliance on third parties
Upgrade costs ✓ Lower upgrade cost by leveraging internal system support
✓ Long-term vendor viability and support. Current WMS solution is no longer offered
Vendor viability in the market
Building the business case – SAP EWM benefits
vs. paper-based manual environment
Basic WMS functionality delivered Key benefits
Fontana, CA
Minimal external consulting
support for post pilot rollouts
Portland, OR
• Business case validation identified
Strongsville, OH significant annual savings post rollout
Strongsville, OH = currently
• ROI less than three years paper-based
Atlanta, GA • Phased rollout vs. big-bang approach 50% of ROI case
to reduce risk
Ft Worth, TX • Applied® would support site rollouts
after pilot deployment
Florence, KY
SAP EWM project charter
✓ The pilot phase deployment plan and approach assumes an enterprise-
wide EWM solution template design for all seven in-scope sites, with
input and feedback from stakeholders across Applied® supply chain
✓ Deploy a stable, fully tested EWM solution for the pilot site, with fully
trained users (including IT staff) and minimal business disruption
✓ Leverage leading practices and standard EWM functionality to
achieve results with minimal solution customizations and
enhancements
✓ Leverage lessons learned from the pilot site rollout for additional site
rollouts with minimal additional support
SAP EWM consulting partner evaluation
EY Other
✓ EY had acquired the leading SAP EWM partners in North America and EMEA
Company stability ✓ EY has established track record in SAP EWM deployments
✓ Stable leadership team and strong financial foundation
✓ EY has been involved with EWM since solution inception in 2005
✓ Supported hundreds of EWM deployments globally
Experience ✓ Global breadth and depth of EWM practice
✓ SAP EWM integration with SAP S/4
✓ Labor scheduling and ✓ Floor level activities ✓ Facility layout ✓ Functionality to enable
planning future processes
✓ Work planning and release ✓ Material handling
✓ Labor visibility equipment ✓ Administration
✓ Accountability ✓ Supporting activities
requirements and support
(i.e., inventory control) ✓ Adjacencies and flow
✓ HR and safety policies
EWM Alignment
An SAP EWM implementation should be viewed through the lens of
best practices to achieve better results.
WOIP key findings and recommendations
Start smart,
scale fast,
adapt and
improve…
quicker
validation leads
to reduced risk
Pilot site deployment plan – 10-month timeline
Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul
WOIP – 5 wks
Test – 8 wks
Kickoff
Training
3 wks
Carlisle
Deploy
go-live
Support
Scope
✓ EWM to ECC ✓ Inbound labeling ✓ Wave ✓ Transportation units ✓ Block/unblock ✓ Standard
integration management ✓ Internal transfers/ replenishment
✓ Put-away ✓ Interleaving
✓ Master data strategies ✓ Picking/picking scrapping ✓ Batch management
strategies ✓ Process-oriented ✓ RF processing
✓ Standard inbound ✓ Inventory counting
✓ Returns storage
processing ✓ Packing/ ✓ Physical inventory/
✓ Labor management
✓ Receiving ✓ Cross-docking repacking ✓ Exception processing cycle count
✓ Serial number ✓ Slotting and
✓ Overages/shorts/ ✓ Standard ✓ Staging/loading ✓ Inventory management rearrangement
damages outbound management
processing ✓ Shipping processing ✓ Trans-ships/ Speed- ✓ Queue and resource
✓ Unloading/staging pack management
✓ Delivery creation ✓ Outbound labeling ✓ Bin to bin ✓ Batch management
Dedicate key resources and combine with strong
program governance
Project steering committee Monthly meetings
✓ Executive sponsor – VP supply chain - Go/no-go decisions
✓ President & CEO - Resolution on critical risks and issues
✓ Chief financial officer - Resolve escalated project and business decisions
✓ VP Information technology - Scope change approval
✓ VP Operational excellence - Ratify critical process changes
✓ Program director - Budgetary review
✓ EY Engagement partner