Bilateral Endogenous Bacterial Panophthalmitis
Bilateral Endogenous Bacterial Panophthalmitis
Bilateral Endogenous Bacterial Panophthalmitis
Fig. 1. The right eye at presentation: significant conjunctival Fig. 2. The left eye at presentation: conjunctival hyperemia and
hyperemia and chemosis, infiltrated, melting cornea, and total chemosis, clear cornea, exudative pupillary membrane, iris
hypopyon hyperemia at the pupillary border, and seclusio pupillae
Fig. 3. Ultrasound sonography of the left eye: membranous Fig. 4. Computed tomography: inflammatory changes
opacities in the undetached vitreous with edema of the retina, in the preseptal and retrobulbar spaces and both eyeballs
the choroid, the sclera, and the optic nerve
signs of retrobulbar cellulitis, and shaded but not ratory tests and electrocardiography were normal.
enlarged contours of the optic nerves (Fig. 4). The diagnosis of endogenous bilateral panoph-
On the first day at our clinic (the ninth day of ill- thalmitis was made on the first day of arrival to the
ness), the findings from the CSF examination were clinic after the abovementioned tests, and a prompt
normal, and a complete blood count test showed treatment was started. Before the intravitreal injec-
leukocytosis (15.4×109/L) with polymorphonuclear tions of vancomycin, the specimens from the an-
leukocytes accounting for 70.9%. The C-reactive terior chamber, the vitreous, and the conjunctivas
protein level was 45.37 mg/L, which was substan- were cultured, which were negative to bacteria. The
tially decreased compared with that on the first day treatment is outlined in Table.
of the illness (238 mg/L). The results of other labo- Despite the treatment, vision in the right eye did
not recover, and pain in the eye intensified. After visual acuity (BCVA) of the left eye was 0.07, and
the 5-day treatment, intermittent left bundle branch the adduction was incomplete; there were slight
block was observed in the electrocardiogram, and signs of band keratopathy and no signs of inflam-
infectious vegetations of the aortic valve were sus- mation, and the retina was attached with a grayish
pected, which hastened the enucleation of the right change in the macula inferonasally from the fovea
eye. The histological examination of the enucleated (Fig. 5). BCVA was the same after the next 4 weeks,
eye revealed vast neutrophilic infiltration of all the but keratopathy was developing further, and the sili-
ocular structures, including the fibers of the ex- cone oil had to be removed. Two weeks after the re-
traocular muscles and a purulent exudate in all the moval of silicone oil, visual acuity decreased to light
intraocular spaces. perception due to hypotony and significant swelling
The left eye responded immediately to intravit- of the retina and the choroid, which were suggestive
real vancomycin. On the next day, pain in the eye, of developing phthisis bulbi. A 5-month follow-up
hyperemia, and chemosis of the conjunctiva de-
creased and hypopyon disappeared. Two days later,
vision acuity of hand movements was documented,
but adduction was still limited.
Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and lensectomy
were performed, when the left eye stopped improv-
ing, and the intraocular pressure normalized. The
vitreous was white, organized with no signs of ac-
tive disease, and undetached. After core vitrecto-
my, necrosis of the retina at 2- to 7-o’clock posi-
tion reaching the macula was found, and the fovea
looked altered. Retinectomy at 2- to 7-o’clock po-
sition sparing the macula was performed (the ne-
crotized retina did not bleed); the retina was fixed
by cryocoagulation. At the end of the operation, an
intravitreal injection of vancomycin and tamponade
with silicone oil (Oculentis 5000) were made. An
intraocular lens was not implanted.
On the next day, the patient was transferred to
the Clinic of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Sur- Fig. 5. Fundus of the left eye after 13 weeks following pars pla-
gery for prosthesis of the aortic valve. na vitrectomy: remaining retina attached, green-grayish macula
After 13 weeks following PPV, best-corrected parafoveal and nearby chorioretinal scars from cryocoagulation
showed the same visual acuity, but eyeball shrinkage Our patient was severely ill from the onset of the
was observed. disease as it is in many septic patients. Meningitis
could have been just another pyogenic metastasis
Discussion as Streptococcus pneumoniae is capable of spread-
Endogenous bacterial endophthalmitis (EBE) is ing rapidly. Still we consider it as a primary focus
the result of bacterial multiplication within the eye due to the fact that bacterial meningitis is mainly
after bacteria cross the blood-ocular barrier dur- caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae (8), and no
ing bacteremia. Associated conditions are related other infectious focus was found except endocar-
to an immune-compromised state, such as chronic ditis 2 weeks after the onset of the disease. Theo-
diseases, especially diabetes mellitus, malignan- retically, the bacteria could have spread to the eyes
cies, therapy, long-term catheters, intravenous drug through the meningeal layer, but bacteremia and
abuse, or invasive surgery. Predisposing factors for hematogenous spread were proven by the presence
the condition were indicated in 40%–100% of EBE of endocarditis.
cases (3, 4, 6). The ocular presentation of EE in the present
The source and the most frequent causative case was typical and met all the criteria for pano-
agents of the infection vary greatly comparing the phthalmitis according to the classification proposed
Asian and Caucasian populations. In the latter, by Greenwald et al. (9). The prognosis of EBE of
gram-positive bacteria dominate (60.7% of EBE such a grade is very poor. For instance, all the bacte-
cases with Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus rial panophthalmitis cases observed by Greenwald et
pneumoniae being the most common); in the Asians, al. resulted in blindness and phthisis bulbi or were
gram-negative microorganisms dominate with Kleb- enucleated (9). Bilateral cases are more commonly
siella species in 77.4% of cases (4). Pyogenic me- caused by EE of fungal than bacterial origin, i.e.,
tastases besides endophthalmitis include arthritis, 33%–45% vs. 13%–25% (6, 9).
endocarditis, pneumonia, meningitis, infection of Delay in recognizing EBE occurs mainly for 2
the hepatobiliary (common for Klebsiella), renal, or reasons: a severe systemic state deterring early de-
urinary tracts, and skin infection, which all could be tection or diagnostic errors. The most frequently
a primary focus of bacteremia (3–5, 7). Microorgan- (37.5%) reported misdiagnosis was noninfectious
isms are cultured from intraocular fluids, blood, or uveitis as an acutely inflamed eye with hypopyon
relevant sites. A negative blood or vitreous culture mimics Behcet’s disease and involvement of mul-
does not exclude EBE as a positive blood culture is tiple joints suggests the diagnosis of Reiter’s syn-
observed in 33%–75% and a positive vitreous cul- drome (3, 5). The diagnosis is facilitated by septic
ture in 56% of EBE cases (3). appearance and panophthalmitis. Extreme eyelid
The period from systemic to ocular signs in EBE swelling, as in the case of our patient, may suggest
is short. The reported range is from a simultaneous cavernous sinus thrombosis or orbital cellulitis (3).
presentation to 35 days with the mean varying from Despite the rapid systemic improvement due to
4.4 to 6.7 days (3, 4, 7). The rapid manifestation of treatment with intravenous antibiotics, the condi-
ophthalmic symptoms from the onset of sepsis is as- tion of our patient was deteriorating, and the left
sociated with a poorer prognosis (4) and may serve eye improved only after the administration of in-
as a marker of a high virulence of the bacteria. In travitreal vancomycin. Such a case suggests that
our case, the virulence of the microorganisms was the therapeutic levels of systemic antibiotics were
also the foremost factor for concurrent severe bilat- not reached within the vitreous regardless of the
eral endophthalmitis and meningitis since the indi- damaged blood-ocular barrier. The administration
vidual without any possible predisposing condition of systemic antibiotics may be insufficient for the
was suddenly affected. treatment of EBE despite their good ocular pen-
According to the literature sources, 53.1%– etration (penicillin or cephalosporins). Data show
63.6% of EBE cases result in no light perception, an improvement in visual outcomes and a reduc-
phthisis bulbi, and evisceration or enucleation, and tion in evisceration/enucleation rates with intravit-
in 69%, the final visual acuity is worse than counting real antibiotics (3). The time from the onset to the
fingers (3, 4, 7). The suggested prognostic factors efficacious treatment (intravitreal vancomycin) in
for poorer outcomes are different and contradictory. our case was 9 days, which is consistent with the
The possible factors include a delay in diagnosis, reported mean of a 9.5-day delay in misdiagnosed
time to ocular symptoms, use of inappropriate an- EBE cases (3). We did not treat with intravitreal
tibiotics, infection with virulent organisms, namely steroids since they are associated with a worse vis-
gram-negative bacteria and group B Streptococcus ual outcome (10).
pneumoniae, diffuse infection/panophthalmitis, hy- The role in saving the vision function and the
popyon, and opaque media (3,4, 7). timing of PPV in EBE are not as clear as it is in
cases of postoperative endophthalmitis after the proceeded with vitrectomy only when no improve-
Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study. Some reviews ment was observed in the left eye.
show an unrelated visual outcome to the use of PPV
(4, 5); others suggest that eyes after PPV are more Conclusions
likely to retain useful vision and less likely to be Though initially functional vision in the better
eviscerated/enucleated (3). The general rationale eye was restored, phthisis bulbi began to develop af-
for a procedure is obtaining vitreous samples, clear- ter the removal of the silicone oil, proving many fac-
ing the vitreous, and reducing the amount of infec- tors of a bad prognosis in EBE: a delay in diagnosis,
tive organisms, toxins, or inflammatory substances an infection with a virulent organism, simultaneous
in order to prevent retinal necrosis. Nevertheless, systemic and ocular symptoms, panophthalmitis,
an inflammatory response and exotoxins may irre- opaque media at presentation, and hypopyon. Better
versibly damage photoreceptors within 24 hours of outcomes of EBE could be expected if bacteremic,
inoculation (3); so, in case of a virulent organism, especially unconscious, patients were examined rou-
only early PPV could hinder necrosis. There was no tinely by an ophthalmologist and, in case of EBE,
reason for prompt PPV in our case since the patient prompt intravitreal antibiotics were administered.
was admitted to the Clinic of Eye Diseases after 9
days; the bacteria were cultured from the CSF, and Statement of Conflict of Interest
above all, intravitreal vancomycin was effective. We The authors state no conflict of interest.
References
1. Nagaki Y, Hayasaka S, Kadoci C, Matsumoto M, Yanagi- 6. Schiedler V, Scott IU, Flynn HW, Davis JL, Benz MS, Mill-
sawa S, Watanabe K, et al. Bacterial endophthalmitis af- er D. Culture-proven endogenous endophthalmitis: clinical
ter small-incision cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg features and visual acuity outcomes. Am J Ophthalmol
2003;29:20-6. 2004;137:725-31.
2. Chee SP, Jap A. Endogenous endophthalmitis. Curr Opin 7. Ang M, Jap A, Chee SP. Prognostic factors and outcomes in
Ophthalmol 2001;12:464-70. endogenous Klebsiella pneumoniae endophthalmitis. Am J
3. Jackson TL, Eykyn SJ, Graham EM, Stanford RM. Endoge- Ophthalmol 2011;151:338-44.
nous bacterial endophthalmitis: a 17-year prospective series 8. Koedel U, Scheld WM, Pfister HW. Pathogenesis and
and review of 267 reported cases. Surv Ophthalmol 2003; pathophysiology of pneumococcal meningitis. Lancet Infect
48:403-23. Dis 2002;2:721-36.
4. Wong JS, Chan TK, Lee HM, Chee SP. Endogenous bacte- 9. Greenwald MJ, Wohl LG, Sell CH. Metastatic bacterial en-
rial endophthalmitis: an east Asian experience and a reap- dophthalmitis: a contemporary reappraisal. Surv Ophthal-
praisal of a severe ocular affliction. Ophthalmology 2000; mol 1986;31:81-101.
107:1483-91. 10. Shah GK, Stein JD, Sharma S, Sivalingam A, Benson WE,
5. Lee SH, Chee SP. Group B streptococcus endogenous en- Regillo CD, et al. Visual outcomes following the use of in-
dophthalmitis: case reports and review of the literature. travitreal steroids in the treatment of postoperative endoph-
Ophthalmology 2002;109:1879-86. thalmitis. Ophthalmology 2000;107:486-9.