Recycling of Condensation Plastics: GPEC 2004 Paper Abstract #52
Recycling of Condensation Plastics: GPEC 2004 Paper Abstract #52
Recycling of Condensation Plastics: GPEC 2004 Paper Abstract #52
Multiple examples in which recycled feedstock has been enhanced with Cesa-
extend products during a simple extrusion step to meet demanding engineering
applications requirements will be given in the areas of polyesters, polyamides
and other thermoplastics.
Vahe Karayan PhD, Clariant Additive Masterbatches, Marco Villalobos PhD, Johnson Polymers
INTRODUCTION:
The current yearly consumption of recycled PET in the United States is about
700 million pounds. In recent years, increased attention has been focused on
improved methods of recycling the articles made from these polymers, with an
eye toward resource conservation and environmental protection.
CURRENT TECHNOLOGY:
A need exists for chain extenders that may be used in any suitable process while
avoiding the processing limitations described above. Such chain extenders
provide substantial economic advantage in processing, reprocessing and
recycling of polycondensates over existing chain extenders and the methods for
their use.
One type of chain extender that has been effective in overcoming the problems
encountered are those based on epoxy-functional styrene acrylic copolymers
produced from monomers of at least one epoxy-functional acrylic monomer and
at least one non-functional styrenic and/or acrylate monomer. Clariant Additive
Masterbatches and Johnson Polymers Company have introduced a
multifunctional oligomeric chain extender masterbatch, CESA®-extend, to reduce
the degradation of PET due to process heat and moisture.
This product is particularly well suited for use with reprocessed or recycled
plastics. It is characterized by its ability to revert the post-processing molecular
weight decrease in different polycondensates from the minimum value reached
without chain extension, back to the initial molecular weight values or even larger
than the original molecular weight values. This is achieved without the incidence
of gel and without adverse effects on mechanical, thermal, or rheological
properties at a target polycondensate molecular weight.
OBJECTIVE:
EQUIPMENT:
A 27 mm Leistritz twin screw extruder with an 8” sheet die fitting and down
stream pick up rolls were used for the experiments.
The pick up rolls were aligned to the same height as the extruder die lip, and the
distance between the two was kept constant at 6.25 inches apart. This distance
was determined by extruding a 100% virgin PET and the process was stabilized
without tearing the sheet or approaching the die lip so close that the sag was
eliminated.
The distance between the die lip and the floor was measured as 41.25 inches,
the RPM of the extruder and the speed of the pick up rolls were kept constant at
90 RPM and 4.3 ft/min respectively. The melt temperatures were also kept
constant at 453°F, torque and discharge pressures were recorded and reported
for each experiment (table 1).
EXPERIMENTS:
Once these reference conditions were set, a series of extrusions were run with
the addition of two different CESA-extend masterbatches, one was a
masterbatch in a PET carrier (CESA-extend 9930), and the other was a styrenic
carrier masterbatch (CESA-extend 1598). After each run was stabilized the
distance between the floor and the lowest sag point in the film between the die lip
and the pick up rolls was measured and recorded (table 2). Each test sample
was dried at 200°F for six hours and the moisture contents were measured to be
below 100 ppm.
Table 1:
Table 2:
The results in tables 1 and 2 show that the addition of either of the CESA-
extend masterbatches slightly reduces torque, and increases die pressure ,
resulting in improved and eventual elimination of the sag observed when no
A D D IT IO N o f C E S A -e x te n d v s D IE S A G
1 .8
1 .6
1 .4
1 .2
DIE SAG in inches
9930
0 .8 1598
0 .6
0 .4
0 .2
0
0 0 .2 5 0 .5 1 2
% C E S A -e x te n d
Figure 1:
CESA-extend has been added to the PET (Photo 1 & 2). The CESA-extend
with the styrenic masterbatch is slightly more effective compared to the PET
carrier based masterbatch, at 0.25% of either carrier masterbatch shows no
effect in the case of the PET carrier masterbatch, compared to 14.29% less sag
with the styrenic carrier masterbatch (fig. 1 & 2).
The virtual elimination of the severe die lip sag demonstrates the positive effect
of CESA-extend on the melt strength and dramatic improvement in processing
capability of PET sheet.
Figure 2:
100
2 100
57.14
1
42.86
% CESA-extend
28.57
0.5 1598
14.29
9930
14.29
0.25
0
0
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
% SAG REDUCTIO N
Photo 1:
Photo 2: