Compulsory English Viva
Compulsory English Viva
Compulsory English Viva
The poet orders his listener to behold a “solitary Highland lass” reaping and
singing by herself in a field. He says that anyone passing by should either stop
here, or “gently pass” so as not to disturb her. As she “cuts and binds the grain”
she “sings a melancholy strain,” and the valley overflows with the beautiful, sad
sound. The speaker says that the sound is more welcome than any chant of the
nightingale to weary travelers in the desert, and that the cuckoo-bird in spring
never sang with a voice so thrilling.
Impatient, the poet asks, “Will no one tell me what she sings?” He speculates that
her song might be about “old, unhappy, far-off things, / And battles long ago,” or
that it might be humbler, a simple song about “matter of today.” Whatever she
sings about, he says, he listened “motionless and still,” and as he traveled up the
hill, he carried her song with him in his heart long after he could no longer hear it
Form - Ballad
The four eight-line stanzas of this poem are written in a tight iambic tetrameter.
Each follows a rhyme scheme of ABABCCDD, though in the first and last stanzas
the “A” rhyme is off (field/self and sang/work).
That beautiful experiences give us life-long pleasure.
Ozymandias
Summary “Ozymandias”
Summary
The speaker recalls having met a traveler “from an antique land,” who told him a
story about the ruins of a statue in the desert of his native country. Two vast legs
of stone stand without a body, and near them a massive, crumbling stone head
lies “half sunk” in the sand. The traveler told the speaker that the frown and
“sneer of cold command” on the statue’s face indicate that the sculptor
understood well the emotions (or “passions”) of the statue’s subject. The memory
of those emotions survives “stamped” on the lifeless statue, even though both
the sculptor and his subject are both now dead. On the pedestal of the statue
appear the words, “My name is Ozymandias, king of kings: / Look on my works, ye
Mighty, and despair!” But around the decaying ruin of the statue, nothing
remains, only the “lone and level sands,” which stretch out around it.
Form
“Ozymandias” is a sonnet, a fourteen-line poem metered in iambic pentameter.
The rhyme scheme is somewhat unusual for a sonnet of this era; it does not fit a
conventional Petrarchan pattern, but instead interlinks the octave (a term for the
first eight lines of a sonnet) with the sestet (a term for the last six lines), by
gradually replacing old rhymes with new ones in the form ABABACDCEDEFEF.
Time is all powerful. Everything else is temporary.
Laugh and Be Merry
If anything Phatik’s mother lacks the responsibility that is required to raise Phatik.
She considers him to be wild though as mentioned he is just an average fourteen
year old boy who likes mischief as many fourteen year old boys do. Bishambar’s
wife isn’t much better when it comes to rearing Phatik and it is noticeable that
she never really embraces Phatik as being a member of the family. She may be his
aunt by marriage but that is the closet that Bishambar’s wife wants to get to
Phatik. Even though Phatik is on his best behaviour he is still not loved by
Bishambar’s wife. For her he is no more than a man child. Yet to be a man and no
longer a child. He is at an awkward stage in life. A stage that Bishambar’s wife
wants no involvement with. Bishambar on the other hand is supportive of Phatik.
Something that is noticeable by the fact that he not only promises him that he can
go home for the holidays but there is a sense that Bishambar will make a decent
man out of Phatik in Calcutta. He is giving him every opportunity.
Phatik’s school days are also a miserable occasion for him. If he is not being
beaten by the teachers he is being beaten by some of the other students. If
anything Phatik may feel isolated. When he lived in the village Phatik was the
leader of his gang. Now that he is in Calcutta things are very much different.
Rather than being a leader he has become a victim. A difficult role for any
fourteen year old to play particularly when they are not getting the support that
they need from the adults around them, Bishambar’s wife being an example. Even
Phatik’s cousins do not help Phatik when he is in school although they may be
afraid of being isolated themselves by the bullies in the school. The unity that
Phatik had in the village. He does not have in Calcutta. As mentioned Phatik is
isolated from others. How deeply affected Phatik feels and how much he misses
the village is noticeable by the fact that he attempts to walk home to the village
but instead manages to make himself sick.
The end of the story is also interesting as it becomes clear to the reader that
Phatik due to his illness is delusional. When he sees his mother he believes that
the holidays (October) have come. Yet those in the room know that Phatik is
gravely ill and is about to die. What was once a healthy boy in every sense of the
world has become a frail wreck in such a short period of time. Tagore possibly
suggesting that Phatik should never have been taken out of the village
environment he was used to. Some children will succeed in the city or with
schooling. Phatik was not that sort of character. He was a lover of nature but he
ended his life surrounded by the walls of Calcutta. Though no blame can be
placed on Bishambar for what has happened. He was simply trying to help Phatik.
The same cannot be said for the two characters in the story who are mothers.
Phatik’s mother due to her impatience and readiness to get rid of Phatik and
Bishambar’s wife for judging Phatik as being no more than an awkward young
boy. Who she really didn’t want to deal with. It is there where the blame for
Phatik’s premature death lays. Neither woman has shown Phatik the love he
deserved and needed.
Abandonment The story brings out how nothing, but abandonment is destined for
Phatik. First, his mother abandons him from his village. In the city, his aunt
despises his presence. His cousins abandon him by mocking and insulting him. His
teachers make no effort to understand him. Bishamber, who should ave assumed
a more responsible guardianship for Phatik remains a mute spectator all along,
while all the other characters desert Phatik to desolation and loneliness. When
Phatik makes peace with his younger brother Makhan, we can assume that
Makhan could become Phatik’s best confidant. However, it is already too late by
now because by then Bishamber has already planned to take Phatik to Calcutta.
There was this certain king who believed that he would not fail if he knew what
was the right time for every action, who were the right people to be with and
what was the most important thing to do. Until he proclaimed that he would give
a great reward to the person who can answer his three questions.
Character Analysis Phatik The protagonist of the story “The Homecoming” is
Phatik Chakravorty. The story traces the tumultuous journey of Phatik – from a
“ringleader” to the like of a “stray dog that has lost its master.” In the beginning
of the story, Phatik typifies a village boy laced with a carefree attitude. The author
embarks upon setting a vivid contrast between the ‘rural’ Phatik and an ‘urban’
Phatik. In the village, Phatik is involved in several acts of mischief. It is notable
that the story itself opens with Phatik carrying out a mischievous activity. Phatik’s
change in behaviour begins when he is about to leave for the city but ensures to
make peace with his brother Makhan, and so gives him his toys. This is a
significant change in Phatik, and it is insinuated as if Phatik must get all-ready to
embrace the changes on the anvil lest he should be swept away by those very
changes. It is said that change alone is constant. Unfortunately, Phatik, a “country
lout” and an “overladen ass” (as held by his aunt) fails to ‘chip in’ through the
jostling of city life. Phatik’s stay in Calcutta is marked by a string of attitudinal
coldness displayed by the people he comes across. His aunt despises his presence,
his cousins tease him, while his teachers flog him mercilessly. Phatik could have
found a saviour in his uncle; however, Bishamber, his uncle, does not assume a
proactive role in making the young boy feel ‘at home’ in his home. The author has
designed Bishamber’s character such that he remains a mute spectator when
Phatik is facing troubles. He had not even ‘briefed’ Phatik as to what all the young
boy could anticipate in a city. Phatik tries to escape but to no avail. He bears the
brunt of his aunt yet again, and an unabated chain of scolding and taunting takes
a toll on his health. It only ends up aggravating
6. his ill-health. In the end, when his mother storms into Bishamber’s, house
Phatik opens his shivering mouth only to answer the question (“Have the holidays
come yet?”) that he asks his uncle many a times in the story. The story ends up
with the answering refrain “Mother, the holidays have come. “ It’s left open to
the readers to surmise, as per their own understanding, as to what Phatik’s
answer entails. It may allude to some greater metaphysical debate, but then
literature is social science – open to differing opinions and interpretations.
Conclusion The story “The Homecoming” brings out the sad fate of Phatik
Chakravorty who fails to chip in through the city-life. The last line of the story –
“Mother, the holidays have come”- continues to haunt readers as to what exactly
happened with Phatik. Did he leave for the ‘holidays’ forever? (Did Phatik die?).
There is a strong possibility that Phatik entered the long sleep of eternity.
However, we are not told as to what happens next. It is left for the readers to
surmise as per their own understanding. And it is this ambiguity that makes this
story so interesting. One thing can be safely concluded that Phatik’s homecoming
is not the village home that he longed for, but some other home. It is left for you
and me to decipher the softer meanings of that some other home where we all
will enter, some day or the other.
Three Questions
The king asked the hermit once again then in every question, he answered:
1. Now is the time to do every action because now is the only time that we
have power.
3. The most important thing to do is to do good for the person you are with.
Three Questions – Summary
Three Questions is a value based intellectual story written by the renowned
Russian writer – Leo Tolstoy. The story is divided into two parts, both are inter-
related and of practical importance.
In order to fully analyze a biography or an autobiography, we need to:
Analyze the purpose of the text, whether it is written to inform, persuade, or
entertain.
Evaluate its effectiveness by examining its use of anecdotes, facts and examples.
Evaluate the author’s writing style, diction, and tone.