Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 63 views

    Sagrada Orden de Predicadores Del Santisimo Rosario de Filipinas V National Coconut Corporation G.R. No. L-3756, June 30, 1952

    Uploaded by

    Jaya Gwen
    This document summarizes a case between Sagrada Orden De Predicadores Del Santisimo Rosario De Filipinas and National Coconut Corporation (NaCoCo) regarding land ownership. Sagrada claims it originally owned the land but it was obtained by a Japanese corporation through duress and then transferred to various entities. NaCoCo now occupies the land. The key issue is whether NaCoCo is liable to pay rent to Sagrada. The Supreme Court ruled that NaCoCo did not have privity or express agreement with Sagrada, so it is not liable to pay rent as it took possession in good faith from the Alien Property Custodian. Any rent NaCoCo collected from leasing the land

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Sagrada Orden de Predicadores Del Santisimo Rosario de Filipinas V National Coconut Corporation G.R. No. L-3756, June 30, 1952

    Uploaded by

    Jaya Gwen
    63 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a case between Sagrada Orden De Predicadores Del Santisimo Rosario De Filipinas and National Coconut Corporation (NaCoCo) regarding land ownership. Sagrada claims it originally owned the land but it was obtained by a Japanese corporation through duress and then transferred to various entities. NaCoCo now occupies the land. The key issue is whether NaCoCo is liable to pay rent to Sagrada. The Supreme Court ruled that NaCoCo did not have privity or express agreement with Sagrada, so it is not liable to pay rent as it took possession in good faith from the Alien Property Custodian. Any rent NaCoCo collected from leasing the land

    Original Title

    Sagrada v Nacoco

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document summarizes a case between Sagrada Orden De Predicadores Del Santisimo Rosario De Filipinas and National Coconut Corporation (NaCoCo) regarding land ownership. Sagrada claims it originally owned the land but it was obtained by a Japanese corporation through duress and then transferred to various entities. NaCoCo now occupies the land. The key issue is whether NaCoCo is liable to pay rent to Sagrada. The Supreme Court ruled that NaCoCo did not have privity or express agreement with Sagrada, so it is not liable to pay rent as it took possession in good faith from the Alien Property Custodian. Any rent NaCoCo collected from leasing the land

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    63 views2 pages

    Sagrada Orden de Predicadores Del Santisimo Rosario de Filipinas V National Coconut Corporation G.R. No. L-3756, June 30, 1952

    Uploaded by

    Jaya Gwen
    This document summarizes a case between Sagrada Orden De Predicadores Del Santisimo Rosario De Filipinas and National Coconut Corporation (NaCoCo) regarding land ownership. Sagrada claims it originally owned the land but it was obtained by a Japanese corporation through duress and then transferred to various entities. NaCoCo now occupies the land. The key issue is whether NaCoCo is liable to pay rent to Sagrada. The Supreme Court ruled that NaCoCo did not have privity or express agreement with Sagrada, so it is not liable to pay rent as it took possession in good faith from the Alien Property Custodian. Any rent NaCoCo collected from leasing the land

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    SAGRADA ORDEN DE PREDICADORES DEL SANTISIMO ROSARIO DE FILIPINAS V

    NATIONAL COCONUT CORPORATION


    G.R. No. L-3756, June 30, 1952
    Parties:

    Sagrada Orden De Predicadores Del Santisimo Rosario De Filipinas – plaintiff-appellee


    National Coconut Corporation – defendant-appellant
    Background:

    Sagrada > Japanese Corp (Taiwan Tekkosho) > US Costodian (Alien Property Custodian of
    the USA) > Copra Export Management Company > NaCoCo
    Claims of complainant Claims of accused

     The land was obtained through duress 


     Annul the sale of property to Taiwan
    Tekkosho and recover its possession
     Right to recover rentals from NaCoCo for
    use and occupation of the premises from
    when it began to occupy until
    promulgation of judgement.
     Defendant used the premises for
    commercial perposes

    Relevant issues:

    Is NaCoCo liable to pay rentals from when it occupy the premises?


    Lower court:

    Supreme Court:

    No, there was no privity between the Alien Property Custodian and the enemy’s owner, the
    former’s title being based, by legal provision, on the right to seize enemy property. The
    occupant’s obligation to pay rentals, like any other obligation, must arise from law, contract,
    quasi-contract, crime, or negligence. If occupant took possession of the property with the
    permission of the Alien Property Custodian, without any express or implied agreement
    between them that rentals would be paid for the use and occupation of the enemy property,
    non may be recovered by the pre-owner. As to the rentals, collected by said occupant from
    its leese, the same should accrue to it, as possessor in good faith.
    Reasoning:

    Doctrine:

    You might also like