Analou R. Ruiz - Unit 4 Learning Activity
Analou R. Ruiz - Unit 4 Learning Activity
Analou R. Ruiz - Unit 4 Learning Activity
Learning Activities
Directions: Read and analyze the following statements and write your thoughts about it. Submit
your work in the pigeon boxes which are provided in your department/college, or to google class
on or before the date as reflected in your study schedule. See Rubrics in appendix. You may
also access the rubrics in the classwork section in the google classroom.
Case 1
Brava & Campos, a large regional CPA firm, was engaged by the Camia Tire Wholesale
Company to audit its financial statements for the year ended January 31. Brave & Campos had
a busy audit engagement schedule from December 31 through April1, and they decided to audit
Camia’s purchase voucher and related cash disbursement on the sample basis. They instructed
staff auditors to select a random sample of 300 purchase transactions and gave directions
about the important deviation, including missing receiving reports. Blanco, the assistant in
charge, completed the working papers, properly documenting the fact that 30 of the purchase in
the sample had been recorded and paid without the receiving reports (required by stated
internal control procedure) being included in the file of supporting documents. Campus, the
partner in direct charge of the audit, showed the findings to Antonio, Camia’s chief accountant.
Antonio appeared surprised but promised that the missing receiving reports would be inserted
into the files before the audit was over. Campos was satisfied, noted in the workpapers that the
problem was solved, and did not say anything to Brava about it.
Unfortunately, Brava & Campos did not discover the fact that Antonio was involved in a
fraudulent scheme in which he diverted shipments to a warehouse leased in his name and sent
the invoices to Camia for payment. He then sold the tires for his own profit. Internal auditor
discovered the scheme during a study of slow-moving inventory items. Camia’s inventory was
overstated by about P200,000- the amount Antonio has diverted.
Required:
a. Did Antonio’s activity amount to an error or an irregularity? Were any related party
transactions involved? Explain
The activity done by Antonio appears to be an irregularity and also a fraud. Antonio
knew that he had violated the appropriate procedure for that situation. His intentions
were clear, which is to perform a fraudulent scheme and benefit from it, alone.
Related party transactions involved in the case and the business are the following:
purchase transactions to which 30 of it were recorded and paid with no supporting
documents, the sale of tires and the use of property leased in his name, but paid by
Camia.
b. With regard to the 30 missing receiving report, does a material weakness in internal
control exist? If so, does Brava & Campos have any reporting responsibility? Explain
The 30 missing receiving report could pose a material weakness in internal control.
Though these are only supporting documents, but required by stated internal control
procedure means that they hold a certain significance. It could be considered as other
deficiency and not material, however a number of 30 is large. It could be a factor
announcing the occurrence of error or a fraud, especially the latter. Furthermore, Brava
& Campos would have to report the occurrence as it was relevant and doubtful.